http://digilib.its.ac.

id

SUMMARY ANALISIS RISIKO DALAM SISTEM KERJASAMA BUILD OPERATE TRANSFER PADA PEMBANGUNAN TERMINAL TERPADU MERAK KOTA CILEGON
RISK ANALYSIS OF THE BOT PARTNERSHIP SYSTEM IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CILEGON-MERAK MULTIPURPOSE Created by Wardani, Retno D.K. Subject Subject Alt Keyword : : Manajemen keuangan : Risk Assessment , Risk Management : BOT ; analisis risiko ; alokasi risiko ; mitigasi risiko

Description :
Salah satu program yang akan diwujudkan oleh Pemerintah Kota Cilegon dalam memenuhi kebutuhan infrastruktur publik adalah membangun terminal terpadu Merak dengan konsep BOT (Build Operate Tranfer). Lingkup pekerjaan yang akan dikerjasamakan meliputi pembangunan terminal dan pasar grosir yang terletak dalam satu area. Adalah hal yang penting untuk mengelola berbagai bentuk risiko yang berkaitan dengan proyek BOT, karena dapat menjadi kunci kesuksesan kerjasama ini. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi risiko-risiko penting yang akan terjadi dalam sistem kerjasama BOT pada pembangunan terminal terpadu Merak, mendapatkan gambaran tentang strategi mitigasi risiko yang harus dilakukan oleh pihak-pihak yang terkait dan untuk mengetahui alokasi risiko yang dapat diterima berdasarkan persepsi Swasta dan Pemerintah Kota Cilegon. Alokasi risiko pada proyek BOT berdasarkan pada prinsip bahwa risiko harus dialokasikan pada pihak yang paling mampu untuk menanganinya. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah perhitungan criticality index, Probability Impact Grid (PIG) dan analisis deskriptif berdasarkan data primer melalui kuesioner yang disebarkan kepada para pegawai senior dari kalangan pemerintahan maupun swasta, serta data skunder. Berdasarkan hasil analisis yang dilakukan, terdapat tujuh risiko yang paling penting pada pembangunan terminal terpadu Merak yaitu : (1) risiko market/ pasar yaitu adanya perbedaan pendapatan riil dengan estimasi pendapatan, (2) ) risiko organisasi dan koordinasi proyek yang kurang baik, (3) risiko pembengkakan biaya konstruksi karena adanya perubahan desain, (4) risiko inflasi pada fase konstruksi, (5) risiko desain defisiensi sehingga mengakibatkan perubahan desain dan RAB, (6) risiko kerusakan pada fasilitas infrastruktur, dan (7) risiko kurang adanya pengalaman pada pola kerjasama BOT. Skenario pada alokasi risiko adalah risiko (1), (4), (6) dan (7) ditanggung oleh swasta, dan risiko (2), (3) dan (5) ditanggung oleh pemerintah. Sedangkan mitigasi risiko dari ketujuh risiko kritis tersebut meliputi (1) mitigasi risiko yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah, yaitu proteksi investasi sejenis, pelayanan satu atap, seleksi partner yang ketat, memberikan poin penilaian tanbahan kepada swasta dalam pelelangan, menanggung beban bunga bank, penambahan equity sharing dengan perhitungan ulang dalam pembagian keuntungan, membiayai desain ulang yang dilakukan oleh swasta, pengawasan ketat pada saat pembangunan; (2) mitigasi risiko yang dilakukan oleh swasta, yaitu mengganti strategi pemasaran, lebih profesional dalam menyiapkan proposal kerjasama, mencari sumber pembiayaan lain, desain ulang, pemeliharaan fasilitas secara layak, merekrut tenaga profesional; (3) mitigasi risiko yang dilakukan oleh keduanya, yaitu evaluasi teknis, addendum, menyebutkan persyaratan penanganan dalam kontrak, menguatkan komitmen kedua belah pihak, Change of Contract Order (CCO), dan studi banding.

Description Alt:
One of the programs which will be developed by the Local Government of Cilegon in providing public infrastructure is building a terminal in Merak under a BOT (Build Operate Transfer) scheme. Under the system, the project scope will be

Page 1

the development of Merak terminal and a trade centre located in one integrated area. It is important to manage the multifaceted risk associated with BOT partnership system, because it can be the key success in the BOT project. The main objectives of this research are to attempt to identify the most critical risks that will be occurring in the development of Merak BOT terminal project, to obtain risk allocation / sharing preference scenario strategies agreed upon by the private sector as well as by the local government and finally to gain risk mitigation which will be provided by the parties involved. The risk sharing in the BOT project is based on the principle that the risk should be allocated to the party considered as having the best capability to manage it. The analysis methods used in this research were Criticality Index, Probability Impact Grid (PIG) and Descriptive Analysis based on primary and secondary data. Risk variables were derived from deep study of literature and then grouped into four categories i.e., financial risk, political risk, technical risk and force majeure risk. The risk variables were further formulated in the form of questionnaire. The questioners were circulated among local senior officers/experts of both parties who have experience in a BOT scheme project. From the analysis result, seven types of risk have been identified as very critical in the BOT partnership system in the development of Cilegon-Merak multipurpose terminal. They are (1) market risk, (2) lack of project organization and coordination risk, (3) construction cost overrun risk due to subsequent modifications to the design, and (4) inflation risk in the construction phase, (5) design deficiency risk which caused changes in design and cost estimate, (6) infrastructure damage (condition of facility) risk, and (7) lack of project experience risk. The identified risk allocation scenarios are : risks (1),(4),(6) and (7) are allocated to private party and risks (2),(3) and (5) are allocated to public party. Data on risk mitigation have been obtained from an interview, resulting in the following mitigations : (1) mitigation risk by public party: protect the private party from similar investment, make one stop service, make a competitive partner selection, give an extra point to private party under the legal tender of the project, responsible for the loan rate, add an equity sharing and recalculate the profit sharing, pay the redesign which is done by private party, supervise the building construction; (2) mitigation risk by private party: change the marketing strategy, make a professional feasibility study, seek another financier, redesign, make a proper facility maintenance, recruit the professionals worker; (3) mitigation risk by both party : make a technical evaluation, make an addendum, state the mitigation risk in the contract, strengthen the commitment, make a change of contract order, and last, make a study tour/learn from other similar projects experience.

Contributor Date Create Type Format Language Identifier Collection Call Number Source COverage Right

: Prof. Dr. Ir. Nadjadji Anwar, MSc. <br> Tri Joko Wahyu Adi, ST., MT. : 08/12/2009 : Text : pdf. : Indonesian : ITS-Master-3100006027478 : 3100006027478 : RTS 658.155 War a : Master Theses of Civil Engineering, RTS 658.155 War a, 2006 : ITS Community only : Copyright @2006 by ITS Library. This publication is protected by copyright and permission should be obtained from the ITS Library prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrievel system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. For information regarding permission(s), write to ITS Library

Full file - Member Only

If You want to view FullText...Please Register as MEMBER

Page 2

Contact Person :
Mr. Edy Suprayitno (edy_supra@its.ac.id) Mrs. Ansi M. Putri(ansi@its.ac.id) Mr. Agus Setiawan (setiawan04@its.ac.id) Mrs. Dewi Eka Agustina (dee@its.ac.id)

Thank You,

Nur Hasan ITS Digilib Supervisor

Page 3