Dosen:
Dr. Ir. Etty Riani, MS
Oleh :
Antarif Kusuma Brata
P052150341
1. PENDAHULUAN
1.1. Latar Belakang
Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun (B3) merupakan bahan yang karena sifat atau
konsentrasi, jumlahnya, baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung, dapat
mencemari atau merusak lingkungan hidup, kesehatan, kelangsungan hidup manusia
serta mahluk hidup lain. Menurut data dari Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
tahun 1997, yang menyusun top-20 B3 antara lain: Arsenic, Lead, Mercury, Vinyl
chloride, Benzene, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), Kadmium, Benzo(a)pyrene,
Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Chloroform, Aroclor
1254,
DDT,
Aroclor
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene,
1260,
Dieldrin,
Trichloroethylene,
Chromium
Hexachlorobutadiene,
(hexa
Chlordane.
valent),
Beberapa
diantaranya merupakan logam berat, antara lain Arsenic (As), Lead (Pb), Mercury
(Hg), Kadmium (Cd) dan Chromium (Cr) (Sudarmaji, 2006). Logam-logam berat
tersebut dalam konsentrasi tinggi akan berbahaya bagi kesehatan manusia bila
ditemukan di dalam lingkungan, baik di dalam air, tanah maupun udara.
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) adalah suatu substansi kimia organik sintetis
yang dikenal sebagai hydrocarbon chlorinated. PCBs bersifat persisten jika dilepaskan
ke lingkungan karena ketahanannya terhadap proses metabolisme yang dapat
memecahkan mereka ke bentuk komposisi kimia yang lebih sederhana. Solubilitasnya
yang rendah di air menyebabkan PCBs terkamulasi dalam jaringan lemak manusia dan
hewan. PCBs dikenal menyebabkan efek kronik pada organ reproduksi, kekacauan
pencernaan, dan luka pada hewan laboratorium/percobaan. Sebagai tambahan EPA
mencurigai PCBs sebagai karsinogen pada manusia. Ditemukan dalam beberapa
penelitian bahwa senyawa PCBs memiliki sifat aktif memicu pembentukan dan
perkembangan sel kanker.
Makalah ini akan membahas lebih lanjut mengenai senyawa PCBs itu sendiri,
mulai dari pengertian, karakteristik, dan juga bagaimana mekanisme PCBs di dalam
tubuh sebagai zat bersifat karsinogenik sehingga menyebabkan kanker.
serta
profil
senyawa
PCBs
dan
sifat
mekanisme
sifat
karsinogenesisnya.
1.4.Metoda
Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah studi literatur serta telaah dari
berbagai sumber literatur yang digunakan
2. PEMBAHASAN
2.1.
yang dapat mempengaruhi setiap bagian dari tubuh. Istilah lain yang digunakan adalah
tumor ganas dan neoplasma. Salah satu fitur mendefinisikan kanker adalah pertumbuhan
sel-sel baru secara abnormal yang tumbuh melampaui batas normal, dan yang kemudian
dapat menyerang bagian sebelah tubuh dan menyebar ke organ lain. Proses ini disebut
metastasis. Metastasis merupakan penyebab utama kematian akibat kanker (WHO 2009).
Menurut National Cancer Institute (2009), kanker adalah suatu istilah untuk penyakit di
mana sel-sel membelah secara abnormal tanpa kontrol dan dapat menyerang jaringan di
sekitarnya. Kanker adalah istilah umum yang dipakai untuk menunjukkan neoplasma
ganas, dan ada banyak tumor atau neoplasma lain yang tidak bersifat kanker (Price et al.,
2006). Neoplasma secara harfiah berarti pertumbuhan baru. Suatu neoplasma, sesuai
definisi Wills, adalah massa abnormal jaringan yang pertumbuhannya berlebihan dan
tidak terkoordinasikan dengan pertumbuhan jaringan normal serta terus demikian
walaupun rangsangan yang memicu perubahan tersebut telah berhenti (Kumar et al.,
2007).
Pada umumnya, kanker timbul karena paparan terhadap suatu karsinogen secara
berkali-kali dan aditif pada dosis tertentu, tetapi pada keadaan tertentu dapat juga timbul
dari dosis tunggal karsinogen. Penyebab kanker dapat satu karsinogen yang sama
misalnya asap rokok (kanker paru), dapat dua karsinogen yang berlainan misalnya asap
rokok dan debu asbes (kanker paru), asap rokok dan radiasi sinar X (kanker paru), asap
rokok dan alkohol (kanker orofarings, larings dan esofagus), gen kanker dan karsinogen
lingkungan.
Beberapa macam kanker terjadi dari satu faktor yang dominan misalnya sinar
ultraviolet yang menimbulkan kanker kulit dan kelainan kromosom yang menimbulkan
retinoblastoma. Karsinogenesis yang diinduksi karsinogen kimia atau fisik maupun
biologik memerlukan waktu yang disebut periode laten yaitu waktu dari pertama kali
kebanyakan kanker seringkali 20 tahun atau lebih. Efek karsinogen yang lemah dapat
tidak terlihat, sebab periode latennya melampaui masa hidup seseorang. Karsinogenesis
dapat dibagi dalam tiga fase utama yaitu fase inisiasi, promosi dan progresi (Kartawiguna
2001).
a. Fase inisiasi
Fase ini berlangsung cepat. Karsinogen kimia misalnya golongan alkylating dapat
langsung menyerang tempat dalam molekul yang banyak elektronnya, disebut karsinogen
nukleofilik. Karsinogen golongan lain misalnya golongan polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon sebelum menyerang dikonversikan (diaktifkan) dulu secara metabolik
(kimiawi) menjadi bentuk defisit elektron yang disebut karsinogen elektrofilik reaktif.
Tempat yang diserang adalah asam nukleat (DNA/ RNA) atau protein dalam sel terutama
di atom nitrogen, oksigen dan sulfur. Air dan glutation juga diserang, dalam beberapa
kasus reaksi ini di-katalisasi oleh enzim seperti glutathione-S-transferase. Ikatan
karsinogen dengan DNA menghasilkan lesi di materi genetik. RNA yang berikatan dengan
karsinogen bermodifikasi menjadi DNA yang dimutasi. Karsinogen kimia yang berikatan
dengan DNA disebut genotoksik dan yang tidak berikatan dengan DNA disebut epigenetik.
Karsinogen genotoksik dapat juga mempunyai efek epigenetik. Kokarsinogen dan
promotor termasuk dalam karsinogen epigenetik yang menyebabkan kerusakan jaringan
kronis, perubahan sistem imun tubuh, perubahan hormon atau berikatan dengan protein
yang represif terhadap gen tertentu. Jadi karsinogen epigenetik dapat mengubah kondisi
lingkungan sehingga fungsi sebuah gen berubah, bukan strukturnya. Waktu yang
dibutuhkan dari pertama kali sel diserang karsinogen sampai terbentuk lesi di materi
genetik adalah beberapa menit. Sel berusaha mengoreksi lesi ini dengan detoksifikasi
kemudian diekskresi atau dapat terjadi kematian sel atau terjadi reparasi DNA yang rusak
tersebut oleh enzim sel menjadi sel normal kembali. Karsinogen kimia dapat
didetoksifikasi/ dinon-aktifkan kemudian diekskresi atau dapat langsung diekskresi.
Tetapi dari proses pengnon-aktifan ini dapat terbentuk metabolit yang karsinogenik.
Sebelum terjadi reparasi DNA dapat terjadi replikasi DNA yaitu satu siklus proliferasi sel
yang menyebabkan lesi DNA tersebut menjadi permanen disebut fiksasi lesi. Waktu yang
dibutuhkan dari pertama kali sel diserang karsinogen sampai terjadi fiksasi lesi (terbentuk
sel terinisiasi) adalah beberapa hari (1-2 hari). Replikasi DNA terjadi karena terdapatnya
sel nekrotik sebagai akibat karsinogen. Replikasi ini dapat diinduksi oleh lain bahan kimia
toksik, bakteri (misalnya colitis ulcerativa menjadi kanker kolon, bronkitis kronis menjadi
kanker paru pada perokok), virus, parasit (schistosomiasis di Afrika menjadi kanker
kandung kemih), defisiensi diet tertentu, hormon dan prosedur percobaan seperti
hepatektomi parsial. Pada jaringan yang mengalami peradangan atau sedang berproliferasi
(misalnya luka yang menyembuh) atau jaringan yang berproliferasi terus menerus
(misalnya sumsum tulang, epitel saluran pencernaan) tanpa terangsang dari luarpun dapat
terjadi replikasi DNA. Pada peradangan belum diketahui apakah terjadi akibat peradangan
membantu pertumbuhan sel atau melemahnya daya tahan tubuh. Sel terinisiasi dapat
mengalami kematian, bila tidak, maka sel dapat masuk ke fase promosi. Pada akhir fase
inisiasi belum terlihat perubahan histologis dan biokimiawi hanya terlihat nekrosis sel
dengan meningkatnya proliferasi sel.
b. Fase promosi
Sel terinisiasi dapat tetap tenang bila tidak dihidupkan oleh zat yang disebut
promotor. Promotor sendiri tidak dapat menginduksi perubahan kearah neoplasma
sebelum bekerja pada sel terinisiasi, hal ini telah dibuktikan pada percobaan binatang. Bila
promotor ditambahkan pada sel terinisiasi dalam kultur jaringan, sel ini akan
berproliferasi. Jadi promotor adalah zat proliferatif. Promosi adalah proses yang
menyebabkan sel terinisiasi berkembang menjadi sel preneoplasma oleh stimulus zat lain
(promotor). Pada percobaan binatang dibuktikan terdapat karsinogen kimia yang bekerja
sendiri sebagai inisiator dan promotor disebut karsinogen komplit. Dari penyelidikan pada
kultur jaringan diketahui fase ini berlangsung bertahun-tahun (10 tahun atau lebih) dan
reversibel sebelum terbentuknya sel tumor yang otonom.
c. Fase progresi
Fase ini berlangsung berbulan-bulan. Pada awal fase ini, sel preneoplasma dalam
stadium metaplasia berkembang progresif menjadi stadium displasia sebelum menjadi
neoplasma. Terjadi ekspansi populasi selsel ini secara spontan dan ireversibel. Sel-sel
menjadi kurang responsif terhadap sistem imunitas tubuh dan regulasi sel. Pada esofagus
epitel berlapis gepeng berubah atau metaplasia menjadi epitel selapis torak yang kemudian
berkembang menjadi jaringan dalam keadaan displasia yang kemudian berkembang
menjadi neoplasma. Pada kolon, polip adalah bentuk metaplasia. Pada tingkat metaplasia
dan permulaan displasia (ringan sampai sedang) masih bisa terjadi regresi atau remisi yang
spontan ke tingkat lebih awal yang frekwensinya semakin menurun dengan bertambahnya
progresivitas lesi tersebut. Belum banyak diketahui perubahan yang terjadi dan faktorfaktor yang mempengaruhinya. Batas yang pasti perubahan lesi preneoplasma menjadi
neoplasma sulit ditentukan. Pada akhir fase ini gambaran histologis dan klinis
menunjukkan keganasan. Penyelidikan terakhir memperlihatkan terjadi aglutinasi pada
permukaan sel kanker sehingga sel kanker tumbuh terus meskipun terjadi kontak antar sel.
Permukaan sel kanker mempunyai lebih sedikit neksus (daerah kontak antar sel). Ini
menunjukkan kurangnya metabolisme dan pertukaran ion-ion antar sel yang juga
menyebabkan sel kanker bertambah otonom. Hal ini lebih nyata pada keadaan displasia
yang progresif ke arah neoplasma. Semua perubahan struktur, metabolik dan kelakuan sel
ini terjadi karena mutasi yang mengenai inti, mitokondria dan membran endoplasma sel.
Kebanyakan sel kanker mensekresi enzim fibrinolitik yang melarutkan jaringan ikat di
sekitarnya dan faktor angiogenesis yang menginduksi pembentukan kapilar darah baru di
antara pembuluh darah yang berdekatan dengan sel kanker untuk nutrisinya. Pada
permukaan sel kanker terbentuk antigen yang menimbulkan respons imun selular dan
humoral untuk melawan sel kanker. Antigen permukaan ini sering ditemukan di jaringan
fetus, mempunyai hubungan dengan derajat diferensiasi sel dan kekhasannya dipakai
sebagai tambahan pada diagnostik kanker.
2.2. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) adalah suatu substansi kimia organik sintetis
yang dikenal sebagai hydrocarbon chlorinated. PCBs bersifat persisten jika dilepaskan ke
lingkungan karena ketahanannya terhadap proses metabolisme yang dapat memecahkan
mereka ke bentuk komposisi kimia yang lebih sederhana. Solubilitasnya yang rendah di
air menyebabkan PCBs terkamulasi dalam jaringan lemak manusia dan hewan. PCBs
dikenal menyebabkan efek kronik pada organ reproduksi, kekacauan pencernaan, dan luka
Tabel 1. IUPAC number dan posisi atom cl dalam segala jenis PCBs
2.3.
(IARC) sebagai senyawa potensial penyebab kanker (IARC 1987). Di dalam studi yang
dilakukan IARC terdapat dua belas kasus yang menunjukan hubungan antara PCBs
dengan kanker. Salah satu contoh yang menunjukan adanya signifikansi nyata antara
PCBs dan kanker terdapat pada kasus kanker testikel di departemen keamanan U.S. yang
penelitiannya dilakukan oleh McGlynn et al. (2009). Terdapat beberapa kemungkinan
mekanisme PCB sebagai karsinogen menyebabkan kanker pada tubuh manusia,,
diantaranya:
Aktivasi metabolik dari PCBs menjadi senyawa reaktif mutagen penyebab
perubahan karyotipe (Robertson & Ludewig 2011)
Telah lama diketahui bahwa senyawa biphenyl dan biphenyl
terhalogenasi merupakan Hidroxylated in vivo dan in vitro. Reaksi hidroksilasi
ini umumnya terkatalisis oleh isoform cytochrome P-450. Eksperimen yang
pernah dilakukan menunjukan bahwa metabolisme dari PCB3 menghasilkan
adisi nukleotida in vitro dengan kecenderungan formasi purin dibanding
pyrimidin. Kebanyakan adisi ini berasal dari arene oxide intermediate. Hasil ini
menunjukan bahwa terdapat pengaruh PCB terhadap perubahan DNA melalui
proses metabolik aktivasi pembentukan senyawa intermediate yang bersifat
mutagen.
Secara garis besar gambaran proses mengenai mekanisme senyawa PCBs
dan senyawa kimia lain menjadi penanggung jawab terjadinya pembentukan sel
dapat dilihat pada Gambar 3.
Senyawa PCBs sebagai senyawa karsinogen yang memiliki peran dalam pembentukan
kanker di dalam tubuh berperan dalam proses inisisasi dan promosi. Dengan dua
mekanisme utama di atas, adanya akumulasi PCBs dalam tubuh memperbesar
kemungkinan terjadinya mutasi DNA yang mengakibatkan kelainan dalam pembentukan
dan perkembangan sel, sehingga terbentuk jaringan abnormal yang berikutnya menjadi
kanker. Semakin besar jumlah akumulasi senyawa PCBs di dalam tubuh, semakin besar
juga kemungkinan terjadinya proses pembentukan sel mutasi penyebab kanker.
3. PENUTUP
Senyawa PCBs merupakan senyawa yang banyak digunakan dalam berbagai
kegiatan aktivitas manusia, mengingat sifatnya yang relatif sangat stabil, paling banyak
ditemukan dalam penggunaan sebagai pendingin trafo dan alat mesin lainnya. Namun, di
lain sisi senyawa ini juga memiliki ancaman tersendiri, karena sifatnya yang stabil
tersebut, senyawa ini tidak mudah hilang, sehingga keberadaannya terakumulasi di semua
bidang lingkungan. Di tubuh manusia sendiri juga terjadi akumulasi senyawa PCBs. jalur
masuk paling banyak senyawa PCBs masuk ke dalam tubuh manusia adalah melalui
akumulasi di bahan makanan. Selain itu jalur masuk PCBs ke dalam tubuh manusia dapat
berasal dari air dan udara. PCBs dalam beberapa penelitian terbukti memiliki sifat
karsinogen. Terdapat 2 mekanisme utama PCBs dalam karsinogenesis pembentukan
kanker, yaitu melalui aktivasi menjadi senyawa intermediates dan juga pembentukan
radikal bebas seperti ROS dan hydroxyl. PCBs dalam pembentukan sel kanker memiliki
peran dalam tahap inisiasi dan promosi sel kanker dalam tubuh.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Hu D, KC Hornbuckle. 2010. Inadvertent Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Comercial Paint
Pigments. Environmental Science Technology Journal. (44)
IARC. 1987. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARC monograph
volume 1 42. IARC Mongr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum.
Kartawiguna E. 2001. Faktor-faktor yang Berperan pada Karsinogenesis. J Kedokter
Trisakti (20) : 16 26
Kira MH dan T Finkel. 2014. Cellular Mechanisms and Physioogical Consequences of
Redox-Dependent Signaling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. (15): 411421.
McGlynn KA, Quraishi SM, Graubard BI, Weber JP, Rubertone MV, Erickson RL.
Polychlorinated biphenyls and risk of testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer Res
2009; 69: 1901- 1909.
Robertson LW dan G Ludewig. 2011. Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) carcinogenicity
with special emphasis on airborne PCBs. National Institute of Health
Publication (Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft). (71): 25-32
Roedziwig M, A Kaczmarczyk, E Niemiryez. 2004. Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the
Sediment of the Odra River and Its Tributaries. Journal of Environtmental
Studies.13 (2): 203 208.
Zhao HX, AD Adamcakova, D Hu, KC Hornbuckle, CL Just, LW Robertson, PS Thorne,
HJ Lehmler. Development of synthetic PCB mixture resembling the average
polychlorinated biphenyl profile in Chicago air. Eviron Int.
of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
Abstract
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Studies of environmental and toxic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are ideally performed
with PCB mixtures reflecting the composition of environmental PCB profiles to mimic actual effects
and to account for complex interactions among individual PCB congeners. Unfortunately, only a few
laboratory studies employing synthetic PCB mixtures have been reported, in part because of the
challenges associated with the preparation of complex PCB mixtures containing many individual
PCB congeners. The objective of this study was to develop a PCB mixture that resembles the average
PCB profile recorded from 1996 to 2002 at a satellite station of the Integrated Atmospheric
Deposition Network located at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) in Chicago, Illinois, using
commercial PCB mixtures. Initial simulations, using published Aroclor profiles, showed that a
mixture containing 65% Aroclor 1242 and 35% Aroclor 1254 was a good approximation of the target
profile. A synthetic Chicago air mixture (CAM) was prepared by mixing the respective Aroclor's in
this ratio, followed by GC/MS/MS analysis. Comparison of the PCB profile of the synthetic mixture
with the target profile suggests that the synthetic PCB mixture is a good approximation of the average
IIT Chicago air profiles (similarity coefficient cos = 0.82; average relative percent difference =
84%). The synthetic CAM was also a reasonable approximation of the average of 184 PCB profiles
analyzed in 2007 at 37 sites throughout Chicago as part of the University of Iowa Superfund Basic
Research Program (isbrp), with a cos of 0.70 and an average relative percent difference of 118%.
While the CAM and the two Chicago air profiles contained primarily di- to pentachlorobiphenyls,
higher chlorinated congeners, including congeners with seven or eight chlorine atoms, were
underrepresented in the synthetic CAM. The calculated TCDD toxic equivalency quotients of the
synthetic CAM (2.7 ng/mg PCB) and the IIT Chicago air profile (1.6 ng/mg PCB) were comparable,
but lower by two orders of magnitude than the isbrp Chicago air profile (865 ng/mg PCB) due to
surprisingly high PCB 126 levels in Chicago air. In contrast, the calculated neurotoxic equivalency
quotients of the CAM (0.33 mg/mg PCB) and the two Chicago air profiles (0.44 and 0.30 mg/mg
PCB, respectively) were similar. This study demonstrates the challenges and methods of creating
and characterizing synthetic, environmental mixtures of PCBs.
Corresponding author: Hans-Joachim Lehmler, 100 Oakdale Campus, #221 IREH, Iowa City, IA, Phone: +1-319-335-4211, Fax:
+1-319-335-4290, hans-joachim-lehmler@uiowa.edu.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers
we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting
proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could
affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Zhao et al.
Page 2
Keywords
Airborne PCBs; Aroclor; PCB homologue; Toxic Equivalency Quotient; TEQ; Neurotoxic
Equivalency Quotient; NEQ; PCB atropisomers
1. Introduction
The complex composition of environmental PCB mixtures and the different modes of action
represent a significant challenge for both environmental and toxicity studies, partly because
the congeners present in PCB mixtures can interact in complex ways to produce effects that
are not apparent from single congener studies. In order to assess health risks in human
populations, it is of particular importance to employ PCB mixtures resembling actual human
exposures for toxicity studies. However, only few toxicity studies with environmentally
relevant PCB mixtures have been reported and most have focused on the ingestion route of
exposure and higher molecular weight congeners. For example, animals have been exposed to
PCB-contaminated soils (Fouchecourt et al., 1998; Hansen et al., 1981b), extracts of soils
(Kania-Korwel et al., 2005; Li and Hansen, 1996b) or pooled extracts of multiple high volume
air samples (Li and Hansen, 1996a). Feeding Great Lakes fish to test animals was used to
closely mimic this important exposure source (Restum et al., 1998; Shipp et al., 1998). Two
studies reported by Larry Hansen and colleagues used fat from Aroclor-exposed animals to
treat another species with the resulting PCB mixture (Hansen et al., 1981a; Hansen et al.,
1983). Several other studies used analyses of exposure sources to formulate synthetic mixtures
from individual PCB congeners. The advantage of this approach is a well-defined PCB mixture,
but environmental mixtures prepared from individual congeners are inevitably incomplete
(Altmann et al., 2001; Gyorkos et al., 1985; Hany et al., 1999; Lilienthal et al., 2000; Parkinson
et al., 1980) and contain only major PCB congeners. A recent study reported the preparation
of a PCB mixture resembling the PCB profile found in Fox river fish using commercial PCB
mixtures (Kostyniak et al., 2005). This approach allows the preparation of large quantities of
a well characterized synthetic mixture containing minor as well as major PCB congeners.
Zhao et al.
Page 3
The present study describes the development of a PCB mixture that resembles the average PCB
profile found in Chicago air using two commercial Aroclor mixtures. This approach was
selected because it is very cumbersome to collect adequate quantities of airborne PCB mixtures,
even for short term pilot studies (Li and Hansen, 1996a), and it is simply not feasible to collect
sufficient PCB quantities from air to obtain an environmental mixture for definite studies. The
synthetic mixture was analyzed by GC/MS/MS and compared to two average PCB air profiles
from Chicago. Finally, the PCB homologue composition, the contributions of congeners to the
TCDD and neuro-toxic equivalency quotients TEQ and NEQ and the distribution of chiral PCB
congeners were determined from the congener profile to guide the toxicity assessment of this
synthetic mixture.
A representative, average PCB congener profile in Chicago air was first determined using an
extensive set of airborne PCB congener profiles recorded at the satellite station of the Integrated
Atmospheric Deposition Network (IADN) located at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT)
in Chicago, Illinois (Sun et al., 2006). To determine an average congener profile, all the
congener concentrations were normalized as a fraction of the total PCBs. That is, for each
sample the congener concentration (pg/m3) was divided by the sum of the congener
concentrations (Equation 1). PCB is defined as the sum of the concentrations of 93 congeners
or coeluting congener groups.
(Equation 1)
This was repeated for each of the 188 samples reported by IADN for the dates January 12,
1996 through Dec 9, 2002. The average congener fractions for these 188 samples were
considered to be the target profile. To allow a comparison with our analytical data (see below),
this IIT Chicago air profile was collapsed to a profile with 88 congeners or coeluting congeners
groups representing 123 PCB congeners.
Recently, a second large data set with airborne PCB congener profiles became available. As
part of the University of Iowa Superfund Basic Research Program (isbrp), a total of 184 PCB
congener profiles were collected using an innovative sampling strategy of vehicle-mounted
high-volume air samplers at more than 37 sites throughout Chicago, Illinois, in 2007 (Hu et
al., 2008). In the following, the average profile obtained from these individual profiles will be
referred to as the isbrp Chicago air profile.
2.2. Simulation of the synthetic Chicago Air Mixture (CAM)
Initial simulations based on detailed Aroclor compositions reported by George Frame and
colleagues (Cochran and Frame, 1999; Frame, 2001; Frame et al., 1996a; Frame et al.,
1996b; Hansen, 1999) and, subsequently, our own GC/MS/MS analyses (Figures 2 and 3) were
performed to determine which combination of Aroclor 1242 and different Aroclor 1254 would
give the best approximation of the average PCB profile observed in Chicago air. The
contributions from each Aroclor were determined by the method of least squares. That is, the
sum of the squares of the residuals (SSR) between the Chicago profile is minimized to
determine the fraction of the mixture made up from Aroclor 1242 (x) and the fraction made up
from Aroclor 1254 (y)
Zhao et al.
Page 4
where i refers to one of the 92 congeners considered. The terms fi,1242, fi,1254 and fi, IIT refer
to the mass fraction of the total PCBs for each congener i in Aroclor 1242, Aroclor 1254 and
the IIT congener profile, respectively. Since this is a binary mixture,
Microsoft Excel's Solver function was used to perform the iterative calculation and determine
the value of x that would give the minimum SSR value. Using this approach, the best match
of the Chicago air PCB profile was found to be a mixture of 65% Aroclor 1242 and 35% of a
late-production Aroclor 1254 (Johnson et al., 2008). A slightly better approximation of the
target profile could be achieved using a more typical, early production Aroclor 1254 lot.
Unfortunately, large quantities of such an Aroclor 1254 lot were not available for this study.
The average molecular weight of this mixture is 284 g/mol, as calculated from published
molecular weights of Aroclor 1242 (261 g/mol) and Aroclor 1254 (327 g/mol) (Silberhorn et
al., 1990).
2.3. Preparation of the synthetic CAM
Aroclor 1242 (Electrical Grade, Monsanto Lot KB-05-415) and Aroclor 1254 (Electrical
Grade, Monsanto Lot KB-05-612) were generous gifts of Dr. Larry G. Hansen (University of
Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, US). The Aroclor 1254 lot is a well characterized batch and contains
a relatively high percentage of dioxin-like PCB congeners (Johnson et al., 2008). Both Aroclor
lots, in addition to Aroclor's 1248 and 1260, have previously been employed to prepare a PCB
mixture approximating a Fox River PCB profile (Kostyniak et al., 2005). Appropriate amounts
of each Aroclor mixture were weighed into a cleaned and tared brown glass bottle to give 20
grams of a 65:35 mixture. The mixture was shaken continuously for 30 days and small aliquots
were removed after 8, 14 and 30 days for congener specific PCB analysis. The PCB profiles
for all three time points were in excellent agreement with each other.
2.4. GC/MS/MS analysis of the CAM and technical Aroclor mixtures
The quantification of PCB homologues was performed by GC/MS/MS with an Agilent 6890N
gas chromatograph coupled to a Waters Micromass Quattro micro GC mass spectrometer
(Milford, MA, USA) operating under electron impact (EI) positive mode at 70 eV and multiple
reaction monitoring, and the trap current was 200 A as described previously (Hu et al.,
2008). The GC was equipped with an Agilent 7683 series autosampler. Two microlitres of the
sample were injected in splitless mode in a Supelco SPB-Octyl fused silica capillary column
(30 m 250 m i.d. 0.25 m film thickness) with helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow
rate of 0.8 ml min1. The collision gas was ultra pure carrier grade Argon. The initial oven
temperature was 75 C which was held for 5 min. The gradient program ran to 150 C at 15
C/min and was held for 1 min. The second step of the gradient ran to 280 C at 2.5 C/min and
was held for 3 min. A representative GC/MS/MS chromatogram of the mixture obtained under
these conditions is shown in Figure 1. A chromatogram of the PCB standard is included in the
Supporting Material (Figure S1). A total of 182 peaks corresponding to all 209 congeners were
analyzed and the relative amount of each congener was normalized as a fraction of the total
PCB mass in the sample as described above. The congener profile of Aroclor 1254 (i.e., lot
KB-05-612) obtained with this method is in good agreement with the published PCB profile
Zhao et al.
Page 5
of this lot obtained using the same GC column (similarity coefficient cos = 0.92; average
relative percent difference = 75) (Johnson et al., 2008).
The differences in the percentage of each congener between the IIT Chicago air profile (Figure
2A) and the synthetic CAM (Figure 2B) are shown in Figure 2C. Although the differences in
percentages were comparatively small, some congeners (e.g., PCB 45 and 118) were clearly
overrepresented in the CAM, whereas other congeners were underrepresented (e.g., PCBs 33,
47&44, 100&95 and 110). This suggests that the IIT Chicago air profile is not a simple mixture
of Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 1254. This is not a surprising observation because PCBs undergo
congener selective weathering in the environment (Hornbuckle et al., 2006).
One drawback of the IIT Chicago air profile (Figure 2A) is the fact that this profile consists
only of a comparatively small number of PCB congeners. In particular, levels of
monochlorinated PCB congeners are not included in the IIT Chicago air profile. However,
these lower chlorinated PCB congeners are of particular interest because they can be
metabolically activated to reactive and potentially toxic PCB metabolites, such as PCB
epoxides, hydroquinones, semiquinone free radicals and quinones (Amaro et al., 1996; McLean
et al., 1996; Song et al., 2008).
The overall similarity of the IIT Chicago air profile (Figure 2A) and the synthetic CAM (Figure
2B) was further assessed using the similarity coefficient cos (Magar et al., 2005) and the
average relative percent difference (RPD) (Kostyniak et al., 2005). The similarity coefficient
cos , determined using the PCB profiles shown in Figures 2A and 2B, was 0.82 (cos = 1
represents a perfect match). The average RPD, calculated for the RPD of all 88 congeners and
coeluting congener groups was 84%. The RPD has been used previously to determine the
similarity of a synthetic PCB mixture and PCB profile of fish from the Fox River (Kostyniak
et al., 2005). In this study, the average RPD between the two congener profiles was 71% (64
peaks representing 92 PCB congeners). Considering that our study analyzed a larger number
of peaks (88 peaks representing 123 congeners), the RPD of 84% in our study still suggests
that the synthetic CAM is a good approximation of the IIT Chicago air profile.
3.2. Comparison of the synthetic PCB congener profile with the isbrp Chicago air profile
A second dataset with 184 PCB congener profiles collected in 2007 at over 37 locations in
Chicago, Illinois, became recently available (Hu et al., 2008). The PCB profiles of this dataset
were obtained using the same GC/MS/MS method and laboratory used to analyze the synthetic
CAM, which allows a better comparison of the PCB profiles. In addition, this new dataset
Zhao et al.
Page 6
includes highly volatile, monochlorinated PCB congeners, which are frequently not analyzed
in air samples due to analytical challenges. However, these monochlorinated PCB congeners
are readily metabolized to reactive metabolites (Amaro et al., 1996; McLean et al., 1996) that
have been implicated in carcinogenesis (Ludewig et al., 2008).
The average PCB profile showing 169 peaks representing all 209 PCB congeners is shown in
Figure 3A. The analogous PCB profile of the CAM and the difference in the percentage
between both profiles are shown in Figures 3B and 3C, respectively. Several PCB congeners
were over- (e.g., PCBs 5, 45, 66 and 118) or underrepresented (e.g., PCBs 18&30, 20&28 and
68) in the CAM in comparison to the isbrp Chicago air profile in Figure 3A. PCB congeners
underrepresented also include PCB 11, which is typically not found in technical Aroclor
mixtures (Hu et al., 2008), and PCB 126, a highly toxic PCB congener (see below).
The CAM was also a reasonable approximation of the isbrp profile, with a similarity coefficient
cos of 0.70 and an average RPD of 118%. As shown in Figure 3, the CAM was missing in
particular higher chlorinated PCB congeners, which contributes to the comparatively small cos
and the large average RPD. The smaller extent of similarity is in part due to much larger
number of PCB congeners used in the comparison of the PCB profiles.
3.3. Comparison of the homologue composition
Figures 3A-3C show a comparison of the homologue composition of the CAM compared to
the two Aroclor mixtures used in its preparation. The homologue composition of the average
Chicago air profile at the IIT site (Figure 4D) and the average PCB profile recorded at different
locations in Chicago as part of the isbrp (Figure 4E) are shown for comparison. While Aroclor
1254 was a medium chlorinated PCB mixture containing over 50% pentachlorobiphenyls,
Aroclor 1242 contained only a small percentage of pentachlorobiphenyls (6 %). Instead,
Aroclor 1242 was composed of comparable amounts of di-, tri- and tetrachlorobiphenyls
(22-36%). This homologue composition is in agreement with the average molecular
composition reported for these Aroclors (Silberhorn et al., 1990). Because the CAM is a 65:35
mixture of two Aroclor mixtures, it contained a much broader range of homologue groups,
with di- to pentachlorobiphenyls making up significant percentages of this synthetic mixture
(15-34%).
Similar to the CAM, the IIT and isbrp Chicago air profiles were composed of high percentages
of di- to pentachlorobiphenyls (Figures 4D and 4E). However, the IIT Chicago air profile
contained twice as many hepta chlorinated PCB congeners compared to the synthetic CAM
(1.8 versus 0.8 %), i.e. these more persistent, higher chlorinated congeners were
underrepresented in the synthetic mixture. Higher chlorinated PCB congeners with seven or
eight chlorine atoms represented an even more significant percentage of the isbrp Chicago air
profiles (13%). This observation is surprising considering the low vapor pressure of higher
chlorinated PCB congeners (Hornbuckle et al., 2006).
3.4. Comparison of the TCDD Toxic Equivalence Quotient (TEQ)
The number of ortho chlorine substituents determines the preferred conformation adopted by
the two phenyl rings of a PCB congener (Lehmler et al., 2002; Shaikh et al., 2008) and, thus,
determines its cellular targets. Several congeners with zero or one ortho chlorine atom can
adopt a conformation similar to TCDD and interact with the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah)-receptor
(Bandiera et al., 1982). These PCB congeners display dioxin-like toxicity and have been
assigned a TCDD toxic equivalent factor (TEF) (Van den Berg et al., 2006). Nine dioxin-like
PCB congeners, including PCBs 77, 81, 105, 114, 118, 123, 156, 157 and 167, were detected
in the three synthetic mixtures, whereas PCBs 126, 167 and 169 were below the detection limit
(Figure 5A-5C). The observation that PCB 126 was not detected is surprising because the
Zhao et al.
Page 7
Aroclor 1254 lot used in this study has been reported to resemble the 1254 A lot (Kostyniak
et al., 2005) described by Frame et al. (Frame, 2001). Specifically, the Aroclor 1254 A lot
contains 0.02% of PCB 126 and, thus, has a high TEQ activity compared to other Aroclor 1254
lots.
A theoretical TEQ based on the 2005 WHO TEF (Van den Berg et al., 2006) was calculated
for the two Aroclors and the CAM by multiplying the weight percentage with the TEF of each
congener. The TEQs the sum of these products are summarized in Table 1 and decreased
in the order TEQAroclor 1254 > TEQCAM > TEQAroclor 1242. PCB 118, which was a major
constituent of the three synthetic PCB mixtures, made the most significant overall contribution
to the TEQ, followed by PCBs 105 and 77. The TEQ of the Chicago air profile determined at
the IIT site appeared to be comparable to the synthetic PCB mixtures (Figure 5D). However,
in contrast to the three synthetic PCB mixtures, PCBs 81 followed by PCBs 118 and 123 made
major contributions to the TEQ of this Chicago air profile (PCB 105 was not included in the
calculation of the TEQ because it co-eluted with PCBs 153 and 132).
The TEQ of the isbrp Chicago air profile was 865 ng/mg PCB as compared to 2.69 ng/mg PCB
for the synthetic CAM and 1.59 ng/mg PCB for the IIT Chicago air profile (Table 1). Although
all eleven PCB congeners with a TEF were reported for this profile, PCB 126 and, to a lesser
extent, PCB 169 made the almost exclusive contributions to the TEQ of this profile (Figure
5E). Both PCB 126 and 169 have a high affinity for the Ah-receptor and, therefore, large TEF
values (Van den Berg et al., 2006). However, the apparently high TEQ of the isbrp Chicago
air profile needs to be interpreted with caution because PCBs 126 and 169 were detected only
at 7% and 10% of the sampling sites.
3.5. Comparison of the Neurotoxic Equivalence Quotient (NEQ)
In contrast to dioxin-like PCB congeners, congeners with two or more ortho chlorine
substituents adopt conformations with larger dihedral angles than dioxin like PCB congeners
and, therefore, do not interact with the Ah-receptor (Bandiera et al., 1982). As discussed above,
these non-dioxin like PCB congeners cause adverse effects, such as (developmental)
neurotoxicity, by other modes of action. Simon et al. recently proposed a neurotoxic
equivalence scheme of relative potency of PCB congeners (Simon et al., 2007). The NEQs
calculated for all five PCB profiles using the neurotoxic equivalent values (NEV) estimated
by Simon et al. are very similar (Table 1). In contrast to the TEQ, a large number of PCB
congeners (52-64 out of 74 congeners with a NEV), mostly congeners with two to five chlorine
substituents, made minor contributions (i.e., < 5%) to the NEQ (Figure 6). PCB 45 was a major
neurotoxic PCB congener in the three synthetic PCB mixtures (7.7 to 14.3 % NEQ; Figure
6A-6C), but made only a minor contribution to the NEQ of the IIT and the isbrp Chicago air
profiles (< 2 % NEQ; Figure 6D and 6E). PCB 52 and 95 made significant contributions to the
NEQ of the IIT and the isbrp Chicago air profiles (> 15 % NEQ). While the contribution of
PCB 52 to the NEQ in the CAM was comparable to its role in the two Chicago air profiles,
PCB 95 was underrepresented in the CAM based on its contribution to the NEQ.
3.6. Comparison of the relative composition of chiral PCB congeners
Some neurotoxic PCB congeners with three or four ortho chlorine substituents and
unsymmetrical substitution patterns in both phenyl rings are chiral due to the hindered rotation
around the biphenyl bond and, like other chiral organic compounds, can be subject to
enantioselective disposition processes or interact with cellular targets in an enantio-selective
or specific manner (Lehmler and Robertson, 2001; Pessah et al., 2009). Figures 7A-C show
that the congener distribution of chiral PCBs differs among the three synthetic mixtures. All
three synthetic mixtures contain comparable total amounts of chiral PCBs ranging from 7.2 to
8.3 %, with PCBs 45, 84, 95 and 132 comprising about 6.3 to 6.7 % of the respective mixture.
Zhao et al.
Page 8
However, the overall distribution of chiral PCB congeners changes significantly with
increasing degree of chlorination of the three synthetic mixtures. For example, the percentage
of PCB 45 decreases from 5.9 % (80% of chiral PCBs) in Aroclor 1242 to 2.2 % (27 % of
chiral PCBs) in Aroclor 1254. Furthermore, Aroclor 1254 contains traces of many higher
chlorinated, chiral PCBs, such as PCBs 88, 91, 135, 136, 144, 149, 171, 174 and 183. Chiral
PCBs 131, 175, 176, 196 and 197 were not detected in any of the PCB mixtures. In contrast,
the two Chicago air profiles display a different composition with regards to chiral PCB
congeners (Figures 7D and 7E). Specifically, the neurotoxic PCB 95 is a major chiral PCB
congener in both Chicago air profiles, whereas PCB 45 represents only a comparatively small
percentage of chiral PCB congeners.
Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants ES05605, ES012475 and ES013661 from the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, and Major Research Instrumentation grant BES-0420378 from the
National Science Foundation. Contents of this manuscript are solely the reponsibility of the authors and do not
necessarily represent the official views of NIEHS and NSF.
References
Altmann L, Mundy WR, Ward TR, Fastabend A, Lilienthal H. Developmental exposure of rats to a
reconstituted PCB mixture or Aroclor 1254: effects on long-term potentiation and [3H]MK-801
binding in occipital cortex and hippocampus. Toxicol Sci 2001;61:321330. [PubMed: 11353141]
Amaro AR, Oakley GG, Bauer U, Spielmann HP, Robertson LW. Metabolic activation of PCBs to
quinones: Reactivity toward nitrogen and sulfur nucleophiles and influence of superoxide dismutase.
Chem Res Toxicol 1996;9:623629. [PubMed: 8728508]
Arif JM, Lehmler HJ, Robertson LW, Gupta RC. Interaction of benzoquinone- and hydroquinonederivatives of lower chlorinated biphenyls with DNA and nucleotides in vitro. Chem Biol Interact
2003;142:307316. [PubMed: 12453668]
Bandiera S, Safe S, Okey AB. Binding of polychlorinated biphenyls classified as either phenobarbitone,
3-methylcholanthrene or mixed-type inducers to cytosolic Ah receptor. Chem Biol Interact
1982;39:259277. [PubMed: 6804100]
Cochran JW, Frame GM. Recent developments in the high-resolution gas chromatography of
polychlorinated biphenyls. J Chromatogr A 1999;843:323368. [PubMed: 10399859]
Denomme MA, Bandiera S, Lambert I, Copp L, Safe L, Safe S. Polychlorinated biphenyls as
phenobarbitone-type inducers of microsomal enzymes. Structure-activity relationships for a series of
2,4-dichloro-substituted congeners. Biochem Pharmacol 1983;32:29552963. [PubMed: 6414484]
Fouchecourt MO, Berny P, Riviere JL. Bioavailability of PCBs to male laboratory rats maintained on
litters of contaminated soils: PCB burden and induction of alkoxyresorufin O-dealkylase activities in
liver and lung. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1998;35:680687. [PubMed: 9776787]
Frame, GM.; Robertson, LW.; Hansen, LG. The current state-of-the-art of comprehensive, quantitative,
congener-specific PCB analysis, and what we now know about the distributions of individual
congeners in commercial Aroclor mixtures. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky; 2001. p. 3-9.
Frame GM, Cochran JW, Bowadt SS. Complete PCB congener distributions for 17 Aroclor mixtures
determined by 3 HRGC systems optimized for comprehensive, quantitative, congener-specific
analysis. J High Resolut Chromatogr 1996a;19:657668.
Frame GM, Wagner RE, Carnahan JC, Brown JF Jr, May RJ, Smullen LA, Bedard DL. Comprehensive,
quantitative congener-specific analyses of eight Aroclors and complete PCB congener assignments
on DB-1 capillary GC columns. Chemosphere 1996b;33:603623.
Zhao et al.
Page 9
Goldstein JA, Hass JR, Linko P, Harvan DJ. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran in a commercially available
99% pure polychlorinated biphenyl isomer identified as the inducer of hepatic cytochrome P-448
and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase in the rat. Drug Metab Dispos 1978;6:258264. [PubMed: 26546]
Gyorkos J, Denomme MA, Leece B, Homonko K, Valli VE, Safe S. Reconstituted halogenated
hydrocarbon pesticide and pollutant mixtures found in human tissues: effects on the immature male
Wistar rat after short-term exposure. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1985;63:3643. [PubMed: 3921224]
Hansen, LG. The ortho side of PCBs: Occurrence and disposition. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Boston:
1999.
Hansen LG, Strik JJ, TWA, Koeman JH, Kan CA. Biological activity of technical Aroclor 1254 compared
to Aroclor 1254 residues: swine fat residues fed to broiler cockerels. Toxicology 1981a;21:20312.
[PubMed: 6794187]
Hansen LG, Tuinstra LG, Kan CA, Strik JJ, Koeman JH. Accumulation of chlorobiphenyls in chicken
fat and liver after feeding Aroclor 1254 directly or fat from swine fed Aroclor 1254. J Agric Food
Chem 1983;31:25460. [PubMed: 6406582]
Hansen LG, Washko PW, Tuinstra LGMT, Dorn SB, Hinesly TD. Polychlorinated biphenyl, pesticide,
and heavy metal residues in swine foraging on sewage sludge amended soils. J Agric Food Chem
1981b;29:10121017.
Hany J, Lilienthal H, Sarasin A, Roth-Harer A, Fastabend A, Dunemann L, Lichtensteiger W, Winneke
G. Developmental exposure of rats to a reconstituted PCB mixture or Aroclor 1254: effects on organ
weights, aromatase activity, sex hormone levels, and sweet preference behavior. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol 1999;158:231243. [PubMed: 10438656]
Hornbuckle, KC.; Carlson, DL.; Swackhamer, DL.; Baker, JE.; Eisenreich, SJ.; Hites, R. Polychlorinated
Biphenyls in the Great Lakes. Vol. 5. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2006. p. 13-70.
Hu D, Martinez A, Hornbuckle KC. Discovery of non-Aroclor PCB (3,3-dichlorobiphenyl) in Chicago
air. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:78737877. [PubMed: 19031874]
Johnson GW, Hansen LG, Hamilton MC, Fowler B, Hermanson MH. PCB, PCDD and PCDF congener
profiles in two types of Aroclor 1254. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2008;25:156163.
Kania-Korwel I, Hornbuckle KC, Peck A, Ludewig G, Robertson LW, Sulkowski WW, Espandiari P,
Gairola CG, Lehmler HJ. Congener specific tissue distribution of Aroclor 1254 and a highly
chlorinated environmental PCB mixture in rats. Environ Sci Technol 2005:35133520. [PubMed:
15954224]
Korach KS, Sarver P, Chae K, McLachlan JA, McKinney JD. Estrogen receptor-binding activity of
polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyls: conformationally restricted structural probes. Mol Pharmacol
1988;33:120126. [PubMed: 3122017]
Kostyniak PJ, Hansen LG, Widholm JJ, Fitzpatrick RD, Olson JR, Helferich JL, Kim KH, Sable HJK,
Seegal RF, Pessah IN, Schantz SL. Formulation and characterization of an experimental PCB mixture
designed to mimic human exposure from contaminated fish. Toxicol Sci 2005;88:400411. [PubMed:
16177234]
Lehmler HJ, Parkin S, Robertson LW. The three-dimensional structure of 3,3,5-trichloro-4methoxybiphenyl, a coplanar polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) derivative. Chemosphere
2002;46:485488. [PubMed: 11829405]
Lehmler, HJ.; Robertson, LW.; Hansen, L. Atropisomers of PCBs. Lexington: University Press of
Kentucky; 2001. p. 62-65.
Li MH, Hansen LG. Enzyme induction and acute endocrine effects in prepubertal female rats receiving
environmental PCB/PCDF/PCDD mixtures. Environ Health Perspect 1996a;104:71222. [PubMed:
8841756]
Li MH, Hansen LG. Responses of prepubertal female rats to environmental PCBs with high and low
dioxin equivalencies. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1996b;33:28293. [PubMed: 8921347]
Lilienthal H, Fastabend A, Hany J, Kaya H, Roth-Harer A, Dunemann L, Winneke G. Reduced levels of
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in rat dams and offspring after exposure to a reconstituted PCB mixture.
Toxicol Sci 2000;57:292301. [PubMed: 11006359]
Lin PH, Sangaiah R, Ranasinghe A, Upton PB, La DK, Gold A, Swenberg JA. Formation of quinonoidderived protein adducts in the liver and brain of Sprague-Dawley rats treated with 2,2,5, 5tetrachlorobiphenyl. Chem Res Toxicol 2000;13:710718. [PubMed: 10956058]
Zhao et al.
Page 10
Ludewig G, Lehmann L, Esch H, Robertson LW. Metabolic activation of PCBs to carcinogens in vivo.
A review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2008;25:241246. [PubMed: 18452002]
Magar VS, Johnson GW, Brenner RC, Quensen JF 3rd, Foote EA, Durell G, Ickes JA, Peven-McCarthy
C. Long-term recovery of PCB-contaminated sediments at the Lake Hartwell superfund site: PCB
dechlorination. 1. End-member characterization. Environ Sci Technol 2005;39:35383547.
[PubMed: 15952356]
McLean MR, Bauer U, Amaro AR, Robertson LW. Identification of catechol and hydroquinone
metabolites of 4-monochlorobiphenyl. Chem Res Toxicol 1996;9:158164. [PubMed: 8924585]
Parkinson A, Robertson LW, Safe S. Reconstituted human breast milk PCBs as potent inducers of aryl
hydrocarbon hydroxylase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1980;96:882889. [PubMed: 6775632]
Parkinson A, Safe SH, Robertson LW, Thomas PE, Ryan DE, Reik LM, Levin W. Immunochemical
quantitation of cytochrome P-450 isozymes and epoxide hydrolase in liver microsomes from
polychlorinated or polybrominated biphyenyl-treated rats. A study of structure-activity relationships.
J Biol Chem 1983;258:59675976. [PubMed: 6304102]
Pessah IN, Hansen LG, Albertson TE, Garner CE, Ta TA, Do Z, Kim KH, Wong PW. Structure-activity
relationship for noncoplanar polychlorinated biphenyl congeners toward the ryanodine receptorCa2+ channel complex type 1 (RyR1). Chem Res Toxicol 2006;19:92101. [PubMed: 16411661]
Pessah IN, Lehmler HJ, Robertson LW, Perez CF, Cabrales E, Bose DD, Feng W. Enantiomeric
specificity of (-)-2,2,3,3,6,6-hexachlorobiphenyl toward ryanodine receptor types 1 and 2. Chem
Res Toxicol 2009;22:201207. [PubMed: 18954145]
Restum JC, Bursian SJ, Giesy JP, Render JA, Helferich WG, Shipp EB, Verbrugge DA, Aulerich RJ.
Multigenerational study of the effects of consumption of PCB-contaminated carp from Saginaw Bay,
Lake Huron, on mink. 1. Effects on mink reproduction, kit growth and survival, and selected
biological parameters. J Toxicol Environ Health A 1998;54:343375. [PubMed: 9650571]
Robertson LW, Gupta RC. Metabolism of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) generates electrophiles and
reactive oxygen species that damage DNA 2000:1632.
Safe SH. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): environmental impact, biochemical and toxic responses, and
implications for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 1994;24:87149. [PubMed: 8037844]
Schuetz EG, Brimer C, Schuetz JD. Environmental xenobiotics and the antihormones cyproterone acetate
and spironolactone use the nuclear hormone pregnenolone X receptor to activate the CYP3A23
hormone response element. Mol Pharmacol 1998;54:11131117. [PubMed: 9855641]
Shaikh NS, Parkin S, Luthe G, Lehmler HJ. The three-dimensional structure of 3,3,4,4tetrachlorobiphenyl, a dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB). Chemosphere 2008;70:1694
1698. [PubMed: 17723240]
Shipp EB, Restum JC, Giesy JP, Bursian SJ, Aulerich RJ, Helferich WG. Multigenerational study of the
effects of consumption of PCB-contaminated carp from Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron, on mink. 2. Liver
PCB concentration and induction of hepatic cytochrome P-450 activity as a potential biomarker for
PCB exposure. J Toxicol Environ Health A 1998;54:377401. [PubMed: 9650572]
Silberhorn E, Glauert HP, Robertson LW. Carcinogenicity of polyhalogenated biphenyls: PCBs and
PBBs. Crit Rev Toxicol 1990;20:439496.
Simon T, Britt JK, James RC. Development of a neurotoxic equivalence scheme of relative potency for
assessing the risk of PCB mixtures. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2007;48:148170. [PubMed:
17475378]
Song Y, Wagner BA, Lehmler HJ, Buettner GR. Semiquinone radicals from oxygenated polychlorinated
biphenyls: Electron paramagnetic resonance studies. Chem Res Toxicol 2008;21:13591367.
[PubMed: 18549251]
Sun P, Basu I, Hites RA. Temporal trends of polychlorinated biphenyls in precipitation and air at Chicago.
Environ Sci Technol 2006;40:11781183. [PubMed: 16572772]
Van den Berg M, Birnbaum LS, Denison M, De Vito M, Farland W, Feeley M, Fiedler H, Hakansson H,
Hanberg A, Haws L, Rose M, Safe S, Schrenk D, Tohyama C, Tritscher A, Tuomisto J, Tysklind M,
Walker N, Peterson RE. The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and mammalian
toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci 2006;93:223241.
[PubMed: 16829543]
Zhao et al.
Page 11
Zhao S, Narang A, Ding X, Eadon G. Characterization and quantitative analysis of DNA adducts formed
from lower chlorinated PCB-derived quinones. Chem Res Toxicol 2004;17:502511. [PubMed:
15089092]
Zhao et al.
Page 12
Representative GC/MS/MS chromatograms for the synthetic Chicago air mixture (CAM)
consisting of 65% Aroclor 1242 and 35% Aroclor 1254 showing the homologue composition.
The analysis was done in the monitored reaction mode. A detailed description of the gas
chromatographic separation is provided under Materials and Methods.
Zhao et al.
Page 13
Figure 2.
Comparison to the synthetic CAM with the average PCB profile in Chicago air. (A) Average
PCB IIT Chicago air profile; (B) PCB profile of the synthetic CAM consisting of 65% Aroclor
1242 and 35% Aroclor 1254; (C) difference in percentage of the PCB congener profiles
(synthetic CAM minus the IIT Chicago air profile).
Zhao et al.
Page 14
Figure 3.
Comparison of the average 2007 PCB profile in Chicago air with the synthetic CAM. (A)
Average PCB isbrp Chicago air profile; (B) PCB profile of the synthetic CAM consisting of
65% Aroclor 1242 and 35% Aroclor 1254; (C) difference in percentage of the PCB congener
profiles of both mixtures (synthetic CAM minus the isbrp Chicago air profile). The labels on
the x-axis show only every other PCB congeners.
Zhao et al.
Page 15
Figure 4.
Homologue composition of (A) Aroclor 1242, (B) Aroclor 1254, (C) the synthetic CAM, (D)
the average IIT Chicago air profile and (E) the average isbrp Chicago air profile.
Zhao et al.
Page 16
Figure 5.
Relative contribution of dioxin-like PCB congeners to the TCCD Toxic Equivalency Quotient
(TEQ) of A) Aroclor 1242, (B) Aroclor 1254, (C) the synthetic CAM, (D) the average IIT
Chicago air profile and (E) the average isbrp Chicago air profile. TEQ values were calculated
from the PCB congener profiles using the 2005 WHO TCDD toxic equivalent factors (TEF)
(Van den Berg et al., 2006). PCB 105 was not included in the TEQ calculation for the IIT
Chicago air profile because it co-eluted with PCBs 153 and 132.
Zhao et al.
Page 17
Relative contribution of PCB congeners with a Neurotoxic Equivalency Factor (NEF) to the
Neurotoxic Equivalency Quotient (NEQ) of A) Aroclor 1242, (B) Aroclor 1254, (C) the
synthetic CAM, (D) the average IIT Chicago air profile and (E) the average isbrp Chicago air
profile. The NEQ for each mixture was calculated from the PCB congener profiles using the
neurotoxic equivalence factors proposed by Simon et al. (Simon et al., 2007).
Zhao et al.
Page 18
Figure 7.
Weight percentage of chiral PCB congeners in (A) Aroclor 1242, (B) Aroclor 1254, (C) the
synthetic CAM, (D) the average IIT Chicago air profile and (E) the average isbrp Chicago air
profile. Only major chiral PCB congeners are shown.
Zhao et al.
Page 19
Table 1
Comparison of the TCCD Toxic Equivalency Quotient (TEQ) and Neurotoxic Equivalency Quotient (NEQ) of
the PCB profiles.
PCB mixture
Aroclor 1242
0.5
0.36
Aroclor 1254
7.9
0.26
CAM
2.7
0.33
1.6
0.44
865a
0.30
PCBs 126 and 169 were detected only at 7% and 10% of the sampling sites.
Inadvertent Polychlorinated
Biphenyls in Commercial Paint
Pigments
DINGFEI HU AND KERI C. HORNBUCKLE*
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and
IIHR-Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Introduction
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are a family of 209 compounds, called congeners, produced commercially as Aroclors
by chlorination of biphenyl. The Aroclor mixtures were
marketed for use in electrical transformers, capacitors, heat
transfer systems, and hydraulic systems (1, 2). Lower quantities were used in voltage regulators, adhesives, caulking
compounds, inks, lubricants, paints, sealants, carbonless
copy paper, coatings, electrical switches, plasticizers, circuit
breakers, dust control agents, and older fluorescent lighting
fixtures (2). Aroclors were used in paint formulations as drying
oils (resins) and plasticizer or softening agents (liquids). Data
provided to EPA indicate that PCBs have been found in dried
paint at concentrations that range from less than 1 ppm to
97,000 ppm (3).
2822
2823
TABLE 1. Colors and Types of Commercial Paint Pigments Purchased from Three Paint Storesa
paint store
code
pigment type
Sherwin Williams
Y1
G2
R4
L1
W1
N1
Y3
R2
R3
B1
yellow
green
red
blue
white
raw umber
deep gold
maroon
magenta
black
hansa yellow
phthalocyanine green
isoindolinone
phthalocyanine blue
titanium dioxide
raw umber titanium dioxide
iron oxide
iron oxide
quinacridone
carbon black
PPG
96-5E
96-4D
96-13M
96-10J
96-26Z
96-7G
96-6F
96-12 L
96-23W
96-2B
96-3C
96-22 V
blue
green
durable red
carbazole violet
medium yellow
durable yellow
red
raw umber
white
lamp black
yellow oxide
violet
phthalocyanine blue
phthalocyanine green
/
/
monoazo yellow
/
iron oxide
/
titanium dioxide
/
iron oxide
quinacridone
Vogel
CC
DD
PP
HH
TT
MM
VV
FF
EE
JJ
KK
blue
magenta
green
exterior red
medium yellow
red oxide
white
raw umber
black
yellow oxide
brown oxide
phthalocyanine blue
/
phthalocyanine green
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/: proprietary.
color
FIGURE 2. Examples of PCB profiles in paint pigments (top two plots) and the frequency of congener detection in the 15 pigments
with detected PCBs (bottom plot).
FIGURE 3. PCB formation mechanisms in the manufacture process of phthalocyanine blue and phthalocyanine green. The subscripts
x, a, b, and c refer to the number of chlorine atoms.
congeners such as nonachlorobiphenyls (PCBs 206, 207, and
208) from less chlorinated congeners (Figure 3). This explains
the presence of much more nona- and deca-PCB congeners
in phthalocyanine green than in phthalocyanine blue, which
can be observed by comparison of PCB distribution profiles
in L1 and G2 from Sherwin Williams, 96-5E and 96-4D from
PPG Pittsburgh, and CC and PP from Vogel.
Azo Pigments. Azo pigments are the most important group
of synthetic colorants with the largest fraction (more than
2825
Acknowledgments
We thank our analytical core coleader, Craig Just, and our
laboratory director, Collin Just. We also thank Kristin Isley
and Timothy Schulz for assisting with sample preparation in
the laboratory. Funding for this work was provided by the
National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS/
NIH) Superfund Basic Research Program (ES013661).
Literature Cited
(1) Aroclor advertisement by Monsanto Chemical Company. Chem.
Eng. June 1956, p 386.
(2) De Voogt, P.; Brinkman, U. A. T. Production, properties and
usage of polychlorinated biphenyls. In Halogenated Biphenyls,
Terphenyls, Naphthalenes, Dibenzodioxins, and Related Products, 2nd ed.; Kimbrough, R. D., Jensen, A. A., Eds.; Elsevier
Science Ltd: New York, 1989; pp 3-45.
(3) EPA. Use Authorization for and Distribution in Commerce of
Non-Liquid Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Fed. Regist., Vol. 64, No.
237, 1999.
(4) Hu, D.; Martinez, A.; Hornbuckle, K. C. Discovery of non-Aroclor
PCB (3, 3-dichlorobiphenyl) in Chicago air. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2008, 42, 78737877.
(5) Choi, S. D.; Baek, S. Y.; Chang, Y. S.; Wania, F.; Ikonomou, M. G.;
Yoon, Y. J.; Park, B. K.; Hong, S. Passive air sampling of
polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides at the
Korean Arctic and Antarctic research stations: Implications for
long-range transport and local pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol.
2008, 42, 71257131.
(6) Du, S.; Wall, S. J.; Cacia, D.; Rodenburg, L. A. Passive Air Sampling
for Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Philadelphia Metropolitan
Area. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 12871292.
(7) Basu, I.; Arnold, K. A.; Venier, M.; Hites, R. A. Partial Pressures
of PCB-11 in Air from Several Great Lakes Sites. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2009, 43, 64886492.
(8) Zanaroli, G.; Perez-Jimenez, J. R.; Young, L. Y.; Marchetti, L.;
Fava, F. Microbial reductive dechlorination of weathered and
exogenous co-planar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in an
anaerobic sediment of Venice Lagoon. Biodegradation 2006,
17, 1927.
(9) Rhee, G. Y.; Sokol, R. C.; Bethoney, C. M.; Bush, B. Dechlorination
of Polychlorinated-Biphenyls by Hudson River Sediment Organisms - Specificity to the Chlorination Pattern of Congeners.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 11901192.
(10) Litten, S.; Fowler, B. I.; Luszniak, D. Identification of a novel
PCB source through analysis of 209 PCB congeners by US EPA
modified method 1668. Chemosphere 2002, 46, 14571459.
(11) Rodenburg, L. A.; Guo, J.; Du, S.; Cavallo, G. J. Evidence for
Unique and Ubiquitous Environmental Sources of 3,3-Dichlorobiphenyl (PCB 11). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, DOI:
10.1021/es901155h.
(12) Peterson, J. E. Toxic Pyrolysis Products of Solvents, Paints, and
Polymer-Films. Occup. Med. 1993, 8, 533548.
(13) Scelo, G.; Metayer, C.; Zhang, L. P.; Wiemels, J. L.; Aldrich, M. C.;
Selvin, S.; Month, S.; Smith, M. T.; Buffler, P. A. Household
Exposure to Paint and Petroleum Solvents, Chromosomal
Translocations, and the Risk of Childhood Leukemia. Environ.
Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 133139.
(14) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Method 3545. USEPA
SW-846, 3rd ed.; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington,
DC, July 1995.
(15) U.S. EPA. Method 1668, Revision A: Chlorinated Biphenyl
Congeners in Water, Soil, Sediment, and Tissue by HRGC/HRMS;
EPA No. EPA-821-R-00-002; U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Water: Washington, DC, 1999.
(16) Doroszkowski, A. Paints. In Technological Applications of
Dispersions; McKay, R. B., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1994;
pp 1-66.
(17) Hext, P. M.; Tomenson, J. A.; Thompson, P. Titanium dioxide:
Inhalation toxicology and epidemiology. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2005,
49, 461472.
(18) Herbst, W.; Hunger, K. Industrial organic pigments:production,
properties, applications 2; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1997.
(19) In Industrial Inorganic Pigments; Buxbaum, G., Pfaff, G., Eds.;
Wiley-VCH: New York, 2005.
(20) Czajkowski, W. S. Organic pigments. In Modern Colorants:
Synthesis and Structure; Peters, A. T., Freeman, H. S., Eds.;
Chapman & Hall: New York, 1995; pp 63-86.
(21) Gregory, P. Industrial applications of phthalocyanines. J Porphyr.
Phthalocya. 2000, 4, 432437.
(22) Uyeta, M.; Taue, S.; Chikazawa, K. Polychlorinated Biphenyls
in Phthalocyanine Pigments. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
1976, 16, 417421.
ES902413K
2827
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
Elna Kartawiguna*)
ABSTRACT
The majority of cancers are caused by extrinsic factors. These include environmental carcinogens
(chemical carcinogen, radiation and virus) and modifying factors (e.g., hormonal imbalance and dietary
deficiency).Genetic and psychological factors also play a role in determining the probability of an individual
developing cancer. Some cancers have one dominant factor as their causative agent. There are three major
stages in tumor development : initiation, promotion and progression. Cancer epidemiology and experimental
carcinogenesis have established that cancer is a disease caused by multiple factors and multistage in its
development. Because the major causative factor of cancer is extrinsic, theoretically most cancers can be
avoided. A rational approach for prevention is the understanding of cancer etiology and its biologic evolution
into progressively more malignant state. (J Kedokter Trisakti 2001;20(1):16-26)
Key words: Cancer, carcinogenesis, causative factors
ABSTRAK
Sebagian besar kanker disebabkan oleh faktor-faktor ekstrinsik,yaitu semua karsinogen lingkungan
(karsinogen kimia, radiasi dan virus) dan faktor-faktor yang mengubah kondisi kesehatan seseorang (misalnya
ketidak-seimbangan hormonal dan kekurangan zat tertentu dalam makanan). Faktor genetik dan faktor
psikogenik juga mempunyai peranan menentukan kemungkinan seseorang untuk menderita kanker. Beberapa
kanker mempunyai satu faktor yang dominan sebagai penyebabnya. Pertumbuhan kanker dapat dibagi dalam tiga
fase utama yaitu fase inisiasi, promosi dan progresi. Dari penyelidikan epidemiologis kanker dan karsinogenesis
eksperimental disimpulkan bahwa kanker merupakan penyakit yang disebabkan banyak faktor dan terjadinya
melalui banyak fase. Secara teoritis sebagian besar kanker dapat dicegah, karena penyebabnya terutama faktor
ekstrinsik. Pendekatan rasional untuk pencegahan adalah pengertian tentang etiologi kanker dan evolusi
biologiknya yang progresif makin lama makin ganas.
Kata kunci: Kanker, karsinogenesis, faktor penyebab
PENDAHULUAN
Penyakit kanker merupakan penyakit
penyebab kematian nomor 2 di Amerika
Serikat. (1,2) Di Indonesia terdapat kecenderungan peningkatan jumlah penderita kanker
dari tahun ke tahun. Penyelidikan selama 20
tahun terakhir menyimpulkan bahwa 60-90%
penyakit
kanker
berhubungan
dengan
lingkungan, sehingga secara teoritis penyakit
kanker dapat dicegah. Lingkungan di sini
berarti semua yang berinteraksi dengan
manusia yaitu bahan-bahan yang dimakan,
diminum, diisap dan dihirup, juga radiasi,
obat-obatan serta aspek-aspek kelakuan
seksual. (1) Dari penyelidikan epidemiologis
dan laboratoris didapatkan bahwa diet
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
Fase inisiasi
Fase ini berlangsung cepat. Karsinogen
kimia misalnya golongan alkylating dapat
langsung menyerang tempat dalam molekul
yang banyak elektronnya, disebut karsinogen
nukleofilik.
Karsinogen
golongan lain
misalnya golongan polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon sebelum
menyerang dikonversikan (diaktifkan) dulu secara metabolik
(kimiawi) menjadi bentuk defisit elektron yang
disebut karsinogen elektrofilik reaktif.(5)
Tempat yang diserang adalah asam nukleat
(DNA/ RNA) atau protein dalam sel terutama di
atom nitrogen, oksigen dan sulfur. (4) Air dan
glutation juga diserang, dalam beberapa kasus
reaksi ini di-katalisasi oleh enzim seperti
glutathione-S-transferase. Ikatan karsinogen
dengan DNA menghasilkan lesi di materi
genetik. (6) RNA yang berikatan dengan
karsinogen bermodifikasi menjadi DNA yang
dimutasi. (4,5) Karsinogen kimia yang berikatan
dengan DNA disebut genotoksik dan yang
tidak berikatan dengan DNA disebut
epigenetik. (7) Karsinogen genotoksik dapat
juga mempunyai efek epigenetik. Kokarsinogen dan promotor termasuk dalam
karsinogen epigenetik yang menyebabkan
kerusakan jaringan kronis, perubahan sistem
imun tubuh, perubahan hormon atau berikatan
dengan protein yang represif terhadap gen
tertentu. Jadi karsinogen epigenetik dapat
mengubah kondisi lingkungan sehingga fungsi
sebuah gen berubah, bukan strukturnya. Waktu
yang dibutuhkan dari pertama kali sel diserang
karsinogen sampai terbentuk lesi di materi
genetik adalah beberapa menit. (6) Sel berusaha
mengoreksi lesi ini dengan detoksifikasi
kemudian diekskresi atau dapat terjadi
kematian sel atau terjadi reparasi DNA yang
rusak tersebut oleh enzim sel menjadi sel
normal kembali. (5) Karsinogen kimia dapat
didetoksifikasi/
dinon-aktifkan kemudian
diekskresi atau dapat langsung diekskresi.
Tetapi dari proses pengnon-aktifan ini dapat
terbentuk metabolit yang karsinogenik. (5)
Sebelum terjadi reparasi DNA dapat terjadi
replikasi DNA yaitu satu siklus proliferasi sel
yang menyebabkan lesi DNA tersebut menjadi
permanen disebut fiksasi lesi. (5,6) Waktu yang
dibutuhkan dari pertama kali sel diserang
J Kedokter Trisakti, Januari-April 2001-Vol.20, No.1 17
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
promotor
untuk
hamartoma
(dapat
menyebabkan perdarahan fatal), kanker
endometrium atau adenoma hati. (6) Setelah
dipakai estrogen dosis rendah dikombinasi
dengan progesteron dosis rendah, risiko kanker
menurun. Penyelidikan epidemiologis menunjukkan obat kontraseptif sekarang tidak
menurunkan atau menaikkan risiko terkena
kanker payu dara dan serviks. Terdapat bukti
obat kontraseptif dapat mencegah terjadinya
kanker ovarium karena obat ini mencegah
ovulasi sebagai efek progesteron (anti
estrogen). Teori kelebihan androgen yang
menimbulkan kanker prostat didukung data
epidemiologis bahwa penderita sirosis hepatis
dan orang yang dikastrasi sedikit yang terkena
kanker prostat. Pada binatang percobaan
testosteron sebagai promotor menyebabkan
kanker prostat. (1)
Esterforbol adalah promotor untuk kanker
kulit, paru dan hati. (4) Kurangnya serat dalam
makanan antara lain menyebabkan kontak
dengan karsinogen lebih lama, memudahkan
seseorang terkena kanker kolon. (6) Dari
penyelidikan didapatkan serat dalam makanan
mungkin menurunkan insidens kanker kolon
dengan cara mencegah interaksi asam empedu
dengan enzim bakteri (flora usus) dalam usus
besar, mencegah pengikatan asam empedu
dengan lain bahan kimia yang karsinogenik
dalam feses, mengurangi waktu feses dalam
usus besar dan menaikkan jumlah feses
sehingga menurunkan konsentrasi karsinogen
dalam usus. (1) Di Inggris ditemukan hubungan
terbalik antara serat pentosa dengan kematian
karena kanker kolon tetapi tidak terdapat
hubungan dengan jenis serat lain atau dengan
keseluruhan serat. (1)
Kurangnya vitamin (A, C, beta-karoten dan E)
dan mikronutrien selenium (Se) dalam
makanan memudahkan seseorang terkena
kanker kulit, hati, orofarings, serviks, kandung
kemih, kolon, lambung, esofagus, larings dan
paru. (6) Kemungkinan vitamin-vitamin ini
memproteksi keganasan terutama dalam
bentuk kombinasi. Dalam saluran pencernaan
vitamin E dan C dapat menghalangi ter(1,5)
bentuknya nitrosamine.
Defisiensi
selenium menaikkan efek karsinogenik
karsinogen kimia pada tikus besar terutama
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
Fase progresi
Fase ini berlangsung berbulan-bulan. (6)
Pada awal fase ini, sel preneoplasma dalam
stadium metaplasia berkembang progresif
menjadi stadium displasia sebelum menjadi
neoplasma. (4,5) Terjadi ekspansi populasi selsel ini secara spontan dan ireversibel. Sel-sel
menjadi kurang responsif terhadap sistem
imunitas tubuh dan regulasi sel. Pada esofagus
epitel berlapis gepeng berubah atau metaplasia
menjadi epitel selapis torak yang kemudian
berkembang menjadi jaringan dalam keadaan
displasia yang kemudian berkembang menjadi
neoplasma. Pada kolon, polip adalah bentuk
metaplasia. Pada tingkat metaplasia dan
permulaan displasia (ringan sampai sedang)
masih bisa terjadi regresi atau remisi yang
spontan ke tingkat lebih awal yang
frekwensinya makin menurun dengan bertambahnya progresivitas lesi tersebut. Belum
banyak diketahui perubahan yang terjadi dan
faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Batas
yang pasti perubahan lesi preneoplasma
menjadi neoplasma sulit ditentukan. Pada akhir
fase ini gambaran histologis dan klinis
menunjukkan keganasan. (6)
Penyelidikan terakhir memperlihatkan terjadi
aglutinasi pada permukaan sel kanker sehingga
sel kanker tumbuh terus meskipun terjadi
kontak antar sel. (4) Permukaan sel kanker
mempunyai lebih sedikit neksus (daerah
kontak antar sel). Ini menunjukkan kurangnya
metabolisme dan pertukaran ion-ion antar sel
yang juga menyebabkan sel kanker bertambah
otonom. Hal ini lebih nyata pada keadaan
displasia yang progresif ke arah neoplasma.
Semua perubahan struktur, metabolik dan
kelakuan sel ini terjadi karena mutasi yang
mengenai inti, mitokondria dan membran
endoplasma sel. Kebanyakan sel kanker
mensekresi enzim fibrinolitik yang melarutkan
jaringan ikat di sekitarnya dan faktor
angiogenesis yang menginduksi pembentukan
kapilar darah baru di antara pembuluh darah
yang berdekatan dengan sel kanker untuk
nutrisinya. Pada permukaan sel kanker
terbentuk antigen yang menimbulkan respons
imun selular dan humoral untuk melawan sel
kanker. (4) Antigen permukaan ini sering
ditemukan di jaringan fetus, mempunyai
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
Virus
Banyak kanker pada binatang disebabkan
oleh virus, pada manusia, virus adalah
penyebab kanker tertentu. (6) Virus EbsteinBarr (EBV) suatu virus herpes adalah penyebab
infectious mononucleosis dan limfoma Burkitt
pada anak-anak di Afrika (1,11) , tetapi malaria
yang menimbulkan supresi imunitas tubuh juga
berperan penting. Data epidemiologis dan
deteksi DNA virus Ebstein-Barr dalam sel
limfoma mendukung hubungan virus ini
dengan 2 macam kelainan
tersebut. Di
Amerika Serikat limfoma Burkitt agaknya
tidak mempunyai hubungan dengan virus
Epstein-Barr. Virus ini diduga ko-karsinogen
untuk kanker nasofarings pada orang Cina
dengan peranan faktor genetik lebih besar. (1,11)
Malaria membantu timbulnya kanker ini. Virus
ini juga diduga penyebab kanker timus. (11)
Virus papiloma (HPV) subtipe 6, 8, 16 dan 18
(6,11)
, virus herpes simplex tipe 2 dan virus
cytomegalo (1) berhubungan erat dengan risiko
terkena kanker serviks. Ketiga virus ini juga
diduga penyebab kanker penis. Penularan virus
didapat karena hubungan seksual yang
biasanya terjadi pada orang yang menikah
pada usia muda atau mempunyai banyak
pasangan atau pada populasi sosio-ekonomi
rendah.
Virus hepatitis B (HBV) endemik di
masyarakat tertentu misalnya masyarakat
Taiwan dan negro Afrika Selatan. Virus ini
pada umumnya menyebabkan hepatitis akut
atau infeksi yang asimptomatik yang
menimbulkan kekebalan. Sebanyak 10% dari
penderita berlanjut menjadi kronis, sirosis
hepatis kemudian kanker hati. (11) Virus
menyebabkan
kematian
jaringan
hati,
merangsang pembelahan sel dan membuat
rentan terhadap karsinogen kimia, maka
kanker hati lebih mudah timbul dengan adanya
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
yang
non-herediter.
Penyelidikan
lain
menunjukkan
penderita
retinoblastoma
bilateral yang sebelumnya tidak mempunyai
riwayat keturunan kemungkinan menurunkan
penyakit ini mendekati 50% seperti pada
penderita retinoblastoma unilateral yang
mempunyai riwayat keturunan. Sedangkan
kemungkinan mendapat penyakit ini adalah
10-15% pada keturunan dari penderita
retinoblastoma
unilateral
yang
tidak
mempunyai riwayat keturunan. Kemungkinan
mendapat penyakit ini pada keturunan
penderita yang tumornya unilateral atau
bilateral dengan riwayat keturunan sangat
tinggi yaitu 60-70%. Dari data disimpulkan
40% keturunan penderita retinoblastoma
adalah karier gen yang dominan. Dari 40% ini,
95% menderita paling sedikit tumor unilateral
bisa juga bilateral. Sebaliknya penderita yang
tidak membawa gen dominan mempunyai
risiko 1/30.000 untuk menderita tumor
unilateral dan tidak pernah bilateral.
Terdapat dugaan mutasi terjadi pada sel-sel
retina karier gen sehingga terbentuk
retinoblastoma. Juga diduga bentuk herediter
terjadi secara 2 tahap yaitu mutasi sel somatik
(sel retina) yang sedang tumbuh dan mutasi
pada sel benih yang akan diturunkan. Pada
bentuk non-herediter terjadi 2 tahap mutasi
yang ke 2 nya terjadi dalam sel somatik untuk
menjadi sel kanker tetapi fenomena ini sangat
jarang (1/30.000). Maka pada bentuk herediter
retinoblastoma terjadi lebih awal dari bentuk
non-herediter karena hanya diperlukan 1 tahap
yang terjadi post-zygotik.
Tumor lain yang mempunyai bentuk herediter
dan non-herediter adalah tumor Wilm (ginjal),
pheochromocytoma (ginjal) (13), kanker kolon,
karsinoma sel basal dan lekemia. (1) Bentuk
herediter tumor Wilm dan pheochromocytoma
timbul pada masa anak. Kanker kolon dan
karsinoma sel basal yang timbul pada usia
muda adalah bentuk herediter.
Faktor keturunan pada kanker didasarkan pada
pengamatan klinis dan laboratoris (terdapatnya
kelainan kromosom yang khas untuk kanker
tertentu).(1) Pada retinoblastoma hilangnya
sebagian kromosom 13, pada tumor Wilm
hilangnya sebagian kromosom 11 dan pada
lekemia kelainan trisomy 21.
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
Saat ini sedang aktif diselidiki efek antiinisiator (penghambat inisiasi) misalnya
vitamin E, C, beta-karoten, selenium, ekstrak
kacang kedelai (penghambat protease) dan
anti-oksidan lain. Belum ditemukan cara
efektif untuk mengatasi kualitas udara buruk
dalam rumah. (6)
Pencegahan sekunder
Pencegahan ini ditujukan terhadap sel
terinisiasi dengan cara menghindari paparan
dengan promotor misalnya alkohol, hormon,
lemak, sakarin dan siklamat. Memperbanyak
substansi yang mengurangi paparan dengan
promotor misalnya serat dalam makanan dan
substansi yang memperbaiki lingkungan
jaringan sehingga proliferasi sel terinisiasi
ditekan atau diferensiasi sel ditingkatkan
misalnya konsumsi adekuat vitamin E, C,
beta-karoten dan vitamin A.
Pencegahan tersier
Paling sering digunakan operasi atau
ablasi untuk preneoplasma. (6) Tindakan ini
tidak selalu mudah dilakukan dan lesi sering
timbul kembali. Saat ini sedang diselidiki
intervensi aktif yang memperbaiki lingkungan
seperti zat anti-proliferatif atau zat diferensiasi
untuk mengembalikan keadaan preneoplasma
ke fase sebelumnya atau menghambat
progresifitas preneoplasma menjadi neoplasma
misalnya lekoplakia mulut dan displasia
serviks dengan retinoid atau beta-karoten (6)
atau asam folat. (1) Keganasan tertentu in vitro
dan pada binatang percobaan yang sensitif
terhadap zat diferensiasi misalnya sel
neuroblastoma in vitro berdiferensiasi sampai
matang dengan adanya asam retinoat. Belum
dilakukan percobaan apakah hal ini juga
berlaku in vivo. Beberapa tahun terakhir ini
diketahui tulang rawan ikan hiu dapat
menghambat angiogenesis. Juga ditemukan zat
dalam jamur maitake yang dapat menghambat
progresifitas
neoplasma
dengan
cara
memperkuat sistem imunitas tubuh.
Faktor psikogenik mempengaruhi tiap fase
karsinogenesis karena mempunyai hubungan
dengan imunitas tubuh.
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
F -X C h a n ge
F -X C h a n ge
c u -tr a c k
N
y
bu
to
KESIMPULAN
Dari penyelidikan epidemiologis dan
laboratoris (percobaan binatang dan kultur
jaringan) didapatkan bahwa karsinogen kimia
merupakan penyebab kanker yang utama dan
paling banyak diselidiki. Penyebab kanker
yang lain adalah radiasi, virus, faktor genetik
dan faktor psikogenik. Selain ini terdapat zat
yang disebut promotor yang membantu
terjadinya kanker.
Dengan memperhatikan macam-macam penyebab kanker dan promotor, kemungkinan
menderita kanker dapat dikurangi seminimal
mungkin. Di masa akan datang kemungkinan
kemajuan ilmu biologi molekular ikut
berperanan menurunkan insidens kanker.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
lic
k
.d o
.c
Faktor-faktor karsinogenesis
.d o
lic
to
bu
O
W
!
PD
O
W
!
PD
c u -tr a c k
.c
Research Article
Abstract
Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), may alter hormonal balance and
thereby increase risk of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT). To
study the relationship of PCBs to TGCT, prediagnostic serum
samples from 736 cases and 913 controls in the Servicemens
Testicular Tumor Environmental and Endocrine Determinants
study were analyzed. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence
intervals were estimated using logistic regression. PCB levels
were examined in association with all TGCT and, separately,
with each histologic type (seminoma and nonseminoma).
Risks associated with seven functional groupings of PCBs,
as well as sum of PCBs, were also examined. There were
significantly decreased risks of TGCT in association with
eight PCBs (PCB-118, PCB-138, PCB-153, PCB-156, PCB-163,
PCB-170, PCB-180, and PCB-187) and no association with
the remaining three (PCB-99, PCB-101, and PCB-183). The
same eight congeners were significantly associated with decreased risk of nonseminoma, whereas five (PCB-138, PCB153, PCB-156, PCB-163, and PCB-170) were associated with
decreased risk of seminoma. All functional groupings of PCBs
were also associated with decreased risk of TGCT and of
nonseminoma, whereas six of the seven functional groups
were associated with decreased risk of seminoma. Sum of
PCBs was significantly associated with decreased risk of TGCT
(P trend = 0.006), nonseminoma (P trend = 0.007), and seminoma
(P trend = 0.05). Overall, these data do not support the
hypothesis that PCB exposure increases the risk of TGCT.
[Cancer Res 2009;69(5):19019]
Introduction
The incidence of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) has been
increasing in the United States and in other developed countries
for at least 5 decades (1). Reasons for the increase are not clear, as
the etiology of TGCT is poorly understood. The only well-described
risk factors are cryptorchism, prior history of TGCT, family history
of TGCT, and increased adult stature (2). The association of TGCT
with a congenital anomaly regulated by androgen levels, as well as
the similarity between testicular carcinoma in situ and primordial
germ cells, has suggested that TGCT risk may be determined
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online
(http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).
Requests for reprints: Katherine A. McGlynn, Hormonal and Reproductive
Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer
Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, EPS-Suite 550, 6120
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852-7234. Phone: 301-435-4918; Fax: 301-4020916; E-mail: mcglynnk@mail.nih.gov.
I2009 American Association for Cancer Research.
doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3935
www.aacrjournals.org
1901
Cancer Research
contacted when the study closed. Thus, of the 831 men contacted, 754 (91%)
agreed to participate. In the instances where the potential case participant
was deceased (n = 27), the study attempted to obtain proxy information
from the mans mother. Thirteen proxy questionnaires were completed. The
TGCT cases were diagnosed between 1988 and 2003.
Men with a sample in the DoDSR who had not subsequently developed
testicular cancer were eligible to participate as controls. The study was
designed as a pair-matched case-control study, although additional controls
were initially identified due to the transient nature of the military
population. From the list of all possible controls for each case, four
individuals who matched on birth date (within 1 y), race/ethnicity (white,
black, and other), and date of available serum sample (within 30 d) were
chosen at random as the control set. Among the controls, 2,579 were
evaluated for inclusion. Of these men, 385 could not be traced, 18 had died,
64 were deployed, 2 were deemed ineligible, and 928 could not be contacted
within 30 d. Of the remaining 1,182 men, 32 were in the process of being
contacted when the study closed. Thus, of the 1,150 men contacted, 928
(81%) agreed to participate. Among the 754 cases and 928 controls enrolled,
720 were matched case-control pairs. The volume of serum in the samples
of 18 cases and 15 controls was insufficient to conduct PCB analysis; thus,
the final analysis set included 736 cases and 913 controls.
P*
Seminoma (n = 313)
n (%)
0.94
67
306
260
159
95
26
(7.3)
(33.5)
(28.5)
(17.4)
(10.4)
(2.8)
64
238
205
132
75
22
(8.7)
(32.3)
(27.9)
(17.9)
(10.2)
(3.0)
623 (84.6)
22 (3.0)
91 (12.4)
897 (98.2)
16 (1.8)
697 (94.7)
39 (5.3)
899 (98.5)
14 (1.5)
705 (95.8)
31 (4.2)
11
404
451
47
(1.2)
(44.2)
(49.4)
(5.1)
9
321
359
45
(1.2)
(43.6)
(48.8)
(6.1)
257
253
237
168
(28.09)
(27.65)
(25.90)
(18.36)
151
217
193
178
(20.43)
(29.36)
(26.12)
(24.09)
238
230
220
224
(26.10)
(25.22)
(24.12)
(24.56)
186
167
146
236
(25.31)
(22.72)
(19.86)
(32.11)
n (%)
<0.0001
12
57
106
74
49
15
(3.8)
(18.2)
(33.9)
(23.6)
(15.7)
(4.8)
0.47
780 (85.4)
34 (3.7)
99 (10.8)
P*
Nonseminoma (n = 422)
<0.0001
52
180
99
58
26
7
(12.3)
(42.7)
(23.5)
(13.7)
(6.2)
(1.7)
0.10
253 (80.8)
12 (3.8)
48 (15.3)
<0.0001
0.37
370 (87.7)
10 (2.4)
42 (10.0)
0.07
302 (96.5)
11 (3.5)
0.0009
<0.0001
394 (93.4)
28 (6.6)
0.0004
297 (94.9)
16 (5.1)
0.86
0.02
407 (96.4)
15 (3.6)
0.24
4
136
147
26
(1.3)
(43.5)
(47.0)
(8.3)
60
96
84
73
(19.17)
(30.67)
(26.84)
(23.32)
59
68
57
128
(18.91)
(21.79)
(18.27)
(41.03)
0.0009
0.93
4
185
212
19
(0.9)
(43.8)
(50.2)
(4.5)
91
121
109
104
(21.41)
(28.47)
(25.65)
(24.47)
127
98
89
108
(30.09)
(23.22)
(21.09)
(25.59)
0.01
0.005
P*
0.02
<0.0001
0.33
*P value of m2 test.
cFamily history in first- and second-degree relatives.
bBMI = height/weight2 (kg/m2).
1902
www.aacrjournals.org
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients of PCBs among controls in the STEED study
PCB
PCB-99
PCB-101
PCB-118
PCB-138
PCB-153
PCB-156
PCB-163
PCB-170
PCB-180
PCB-183
PCB-187
Sum of PCBs
Wolff 1B
Wolff 2A
Wolff 2B
Wolff 3
CYP inducers
Phenobarbital inducers
Mixed function oxidase inducers
Wolff groups
101 118 138 153 156 163 170 180 183 187 Sum
1B
2A
2B
CYP
PB
MFO
0.26
0.45
0.67
0.66
0.69
0.77
0.62
0.73
0.75
0.80
0.77
0.86
0.83
0.70
0.32
0.92
0.93
0.91
0.92
0.92
0.76
0.72
0.72
0.69
0.93
0.69
0.58
0.21
0.73
0.94
0.97
0.92
0.94
0.94
0.90
0.87
0.86
0.98
0.76
0.89
0.70
0.27
0.76
0.93
0.97
0.86
0.92
0.87
0.88
0.92
0.87
0.98
0.80
0.88
0.96
0.69
0.38
0.83
0.94
0.97
0.88
0.94
0.87
0.87
0.89
0.87
1.00
0.86
0.93
0.96
0.98
0.69
0.39
0.80
0.93
0.97
0.87
0.94
0.87
0.87
0.90
0.86
0.99
0.86
0.91
0.95
0.99
1.00
0.66
0.27
0.85
0.96
0.97
0.95
0.96
0.88
0.83
0.82
0.80
0.98
0.75
0.97
0.97
0.94
0.97
0.96
0.71
0.45
0.73
0.23
0.81
0.63
0.24
0.77
0.96
0.59
0.15
0.70
0.90
0.91
0.59
0.21
0.75
0.91
0.96
0.95
0.38
0.18
0.57
0.78
0.87
0.83
0.87
www.aacrjournals.org
Inducers
0.34
0.21
0.54
0.74
0.86
0.78
0.84
0.96
0.48
0.23
0.62
0.82
0.88
0.72
0.80
0.81
0.84
0.41
0.20
0.56
0.75
0.85
0.71
0.82
0.86
0.91
0.85
0.67
0.34
0.82
0.95
0.98
0.90
0.95
0.88
0.87
0.86
0.86
controls. PCB levels that fell below or were equal to the limit of detection
were imputed as the midpoint of the limit and were included in the first
quartile for regression analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence
intervals (95% CI) were calculated to estimate the association of each PCB
with risk of TGCT and separately with risk of seminoma and nonseminoma.
One case was excluded from histology-specific analyses because tumor
histology was unavailable.
Given the matched case-control design, risk estimates adjusting for
confounders were first generated using conditional logistic regression,
restricting the analysis to only the matched sets. Modeling using
unconditional logistic regression was subsequently performed using the
data from all participants. As the latter involved breaking the match, risk
estimates derived from the unconditional logistic regression models were
adjusted for the three matching factors: age at reference date, race/
ethnicity, and date of serum sample collection. Both logistic regression
models were adjusted for cryptorchism, family history of testicular cancer,
age at serum draw, adult stature, and body mass index (BMI), as BMI is
associated with plasma PCB levels (18). As previous research in the STEED
population had identified p,p-DDE as a risk factor, serum p,p-DDE level
was also included in the models (10). Tests for trend in risk were computed
using scored variables for PCB levels, based on the median levels of each
quartile, to evaluate possible dose-response relationships. As results using
conditional and unconditional logistic regression were similar, only those
using the latter approach are presented.
All tests were two sided, with P < 0.05 defined as the level of statistical
significance.
Statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Analysis System
Release 9.1 (SAS Institute, Inc.).
Results
As shown in Table 1, 913 controls and 736 cases (313 seminoma, 422 nonseminoma, and 1 histology unavailable) were included in the analysis. Cases and controls were matched on age
and ethnicity, resulting in no significant differences in the distributions of these variables. The seminoma cases were somewhat
older than the controls, whereas the nonseminoma cases were
somewhat younger. The cases, particularly the nonseminoma cases,
1903
Cancer Research
Table 3. Adjusted relative risk of TGCTs by quartile of lipid-adjusted levels of serum organochlorines in the STEED study
ng/g lipid
PCB-99
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-101
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-118
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-138
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-153
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-156
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-163
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-170
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-180
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
Controls
All TGCT
Seminoma
Nonseminoma
<9.9
9.912.5
12.618.3
>18.3
590
109
106
107
496
68
90
81
1.00
0.72 (0.521.02)
0.89 (0.641.24)
0.80 (0.571.13)
0.14
199
33
40
41
1.00
0.78 (0.501.22)
0.86 (0.561.34)
0.80 (0.511.25)
0.26
297
35
49
40
1.00
0.68 (0.441.04)
0.91 (0.611.35)
0.76 (0.501.17)
0.16
<4.7
4.76.1
6.28.9
>8.9
570
114
114
114
469
82
93
90
1.00
0.93 (0.671.27)
1.06 (0.781.44)
1.01 (0.741.38)
0.92
200
33
39
40
1.00
0.82 (0.531.27)
1.06 (0.701.61)
1.12 (0.741.70)
0.64
268
49
54
50
1.00
0.99 (0.681.45)
1.12 (0.771.62)
0.91 (0.621.33)
0.80
<7.2
7.210.5
10.615.6
>15.6
265
216
216
216
266
171
151
148
1.00
0.71 (0.530.94)
0.60 (0.450.81)
0.55 (0.400.76)
0.0007
82
80
76
75
1.00
0.97 (0.661.44)
0.86 (0.571.28)
0.72 (0.471.12)
0.10
184
91
74
73
1.00
0.59 (0.420.82)
0.47 (0.330.68)
0.45 (0.310.66)
0.0001
<15.6
15.624.5
24.637.7
>37.7
236
227
225
225
242
168
162
164
1.00
0.65 (0.480.88)
0.54 (0.390.75)
0.46 (0.320.66)
0.0001
73
68
88
84
1.00
0.78 (0.511.20)
0.78 (0.501.22)
0.52 (0.310.86)
0.01
169
100
74
79
1.00
0.61 (0.430.86)
0.41 (0.280.61)
0.42 (0.270.65)
0.0002
<23.4
23.437.2
37.356.3
>56.3
231
227
229
226
243
158
166
169
1.00
0.61 (0.450.82)
0.53 (0.380.73)
0.45 (0.310.66)
0.0003
74
61
85
93
1.00
0.71 (0.461.09)
0.69 (0.441.09)
0.52 (0.310.87)
0.02
169
97
81
75
1.00
0.58 (0.410.82)
0.44 (0.300.65)
0.40 (0.260.63)
0.0002
<5.3
5.36.9
7.010.0
>10.0
477
145
149
142
422
98
120
96
1.00
0.66 (0.480.90)
0.77 (0.561.06)
0.57 (0.400.81)
0.002
148
44
69
52
1.00
0.68 (0.451.05)
0.93 (0.621.40)
0.54 (0.340.86)
0.02
274
54
50
44
1.00
0.63 (0.430.92)
0.63 (0.420.93)
0.58 (0.370.91)
0.006
<5.9
5.98.1
8.211.5
>11.5
397
172
172
172
367
128
110
131
1.00
0.70 (0.520.93)
0.55 (0.400.76)
0.59 (0.420.83)
0.001
126
56
59
72
1.00
0.73 (0.481.09)
0.64 (0.420.98)
0.58 (0.370.92)
0.02
241
72
50
59
1.00
0.69 (0.490.98)
0.46 (0.310.69)
0.57 (0.370.86)
0.002
<6.5
6.59.7
9.814.5
>14.5
335
192
193
193
311
145
136
144
1.00
0.73 (0.550.98)
0.61 (0.440.84)
0.56 (0.390.80)
0.002
101
61
71
80
1.00
0.74 (0.491.12)
0.68 (0.441.04)
0.56 (0.350.91)
0.03
210
84
65
63
1.00
0.74 (0.531.05)
0.56 (0.380.82)
0.55 (0.360.85)
0.005
<15.8
15.825.9
26.041.8
>41.8
234
227
226
226
222
177
176
161
1.00
0.83 (0.621.12)
0.68 (0.490.95)
0.56 (0.380.82)
0.003
65
65
90
93
1.00
0.97 (0.631.48)
0.86 (0.551.37)
0.67 (0.391.13)
0.08
157
112
85
68
1.00
0.80 (0.571.12)
0.59 (0.400.87)
0.51 (0.320.81)
0.004
1904
www.aacrjournals.org
Table 3. Adjusted relative risk of TGCTs by quartile of lipid-adjusted levels of serum organochlorines in the STEED
study (Contd)
ng/g lipid
PCB-183
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
PCB-187
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
P trend
Controls
All TGCT
Seminoma
Nonseminoma
<4.2
4.25.1
5.26.6
>6.6
689
74
75
75
573
44
54
65
1.00
0.62 (0.410.93)
0.75 (0.501.12)
0.86 (0.581.29)
0.13
219
24
36
34
1.00
0.65 (0.381.09)
0.91 (0.561.47)
0.77 (0.461.29)
0.25
353
20
18
31
1.00
0.56 (0.320.96)
0.55 (0.310.97)
0.92 (0.561.52)
0.14
<5.8
5.88.0
8.111.6
>11.6
386
177
175
175
350
133
120
133
1.00
0.70 (0.520.94)
0.58 (0.420.81)
0.60 (0.420.86)
0.004
111
59
62
81
1.00
0.81 (0.541.21)
0.71 (0.461.10)
0.75 (0.471.20)
0.27
239
74
57
52
1.00
0.65 (0.450.92)
0.49 (0.330.73)
0.48 (0.310.75)
0.0004
*Adjusted for matching variables, serum DDE level, age at serum draw, BMI, and height.
www.aacrjournals.org
Discussion
The incidence of TGCT has been increasing in the United States
since before World War II (19). Although few risk factors have been
identified, several studies have reported that there is a pronounced
birth cohort effect on risk, suggesting that changes in exogenous
exposures may be related to the trend (20). One exogenous
exposure, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including PCBs, has
been the subject of much speculation, as animal data suggested
1905
Cancer Research
Table 4. Adjusted relative risk of TGCTs by quartile of PCB groupings in the STEED study
Controls
n
All TGCT
n
Seminoma
Nonseminoma
1.00
0.97 (0.641.48)
0.77 (0.491.22)
0.80 (0.491.29)
0.33
150
116
79
76
1.00
0.83 (0.591.16)
0.56 (0.380.83)
0.55 (0.360.84)
0.004
1.00
0.64 (0.420.99)
0.83 (0.541.28)
0.44 (0.270.72)
0.002
169
95
87
71
1.00
0.56 (0.400.79)
0.50 (0.340.72)
0.38 (0.250.58)
<0.0001
1.00
0.70 (0.451.08)
0.75 (0.481.17)
0.49 (0.290.83)
0.01
160
104
84
74
1.00
0.68 (0.480.95)
0.49 (0.330.73)
0.43 (0.270.68)
0.0004
1.00
0.63 (0.410.97)
0.64 (0.401.00)
0.49 (0.290.81)
0.02
158
101
84
78
1.00
0.64 (0.460.91)
0.53 (0.360.78)
0.46 (0.290.71)
0.003
1.00
0.67 (0.441.02)
0.64 (0.411.00)
0.50 (0.300.83)
0.003
161
104
80
76
1.00
0.65 (0.460.91)
0.47 (0.320.70)
0.44 (0.280.68)
0.03
1.00
0.74 (0.491.12)
0.62 (0.390.97)
0.47 (0.290.79)
0.006
160
98
89
74
1.00
0.61 (0.430.86)
0.55 (0.380.81)
0.43 (0.280.67)
0.0009
1.00
0.64 (0.420.99)
0.66 (0.421.03)
0.42 (0.250.71)
0.003
160
107
85
70
1.00
0.65 (0.460.91)
0.47 (0.320.69)
0.39 (0.250.61)
<0.0001
1.00
0.58 (0.380.90)
0.67 (0.421.05)
0.45 (0.270.76)
0.01
160
105
77
79
1.00
0.65 (0.460.92)
0.46 (0.310.69)
0.45 (0.290.71)
0.001
1906
www.aacrjournals.org
Table 4. Adjusted relative risk of TGCTs by quartile of PCB groupings in the STEED study (Contd)
Controls
n
All TGCT
Seminoma
Nonseminoma
224
171
175
162
1.00
0.88 (0.671.16)
0.73 (0.540.98)
0.61 (0.430.86)
0.006
74
60
91
88
1.00
0.90 (0.601.35)
0.89 (0.591.34)
0.64 (0.411.02)
0.05
150
111
84
73
1.00
0.84 (0.611.15)
0.62 (0.430.88)
0.55 (0.370.83)
0.007
*Adjusted for matching variables, serum DDE level, age at serum draw, BMI, and height.
cTotal PCB exposure is sum of all PCB observations above the limit of detection for all PCBs assayed: 28, 52, 99, 101, 118, 128, 138, 153, 156, 163, 170,
180, 183, and 187.
www.aacrjournals.org
1907
Cancer Research
Table 5. Risk of TGCT by DDE and PCB levels in the STEED study
All TGCT
Seminoma
Nonseminoma
343/455
1.00
0.59 (0.410.85)
0.67 (0.421.06)
0.75 (0.401.41)
0.36
123/455
1.00
0.70 (0.411.19)
0.72 (0.371.41)
1.05 (0.452.44)
0.93
219/455
1.00
0.56 (0.370.85)
0.62 (0.361.07)
0.59 (0.271.28)
0.15
390/457
1.00
0.41 (0.200.85)
0.27 (0.130.56)
0.28 (0.130.60)
0.03
0.48
189/457
1.00
0.33 (0.130.87)
0.35 (0.140.91)
0.27 (0.100.74)
0.11
0.29
201/457
1.00
0.45 (0.201.00)
0.21 (0.090.48)
0.28 (0.120.66)
0.04
0.72
*Adjusted for reference age, race, serum date, family history of TGCT, cryptorchism, age at serum draw, BMI, and height.
Acknowledgments
Received 10/9/2008; revised 12/5/2008; accepted 12/8/2008; published OnlineFirst
02/17/2009.
Grant support: Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute,
NIH, Department of Health and Human Services.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Emily Steplowski and Leslie Carroll of IMS for their contributions in data
management and analysis and the STEED participants, without whom there would
have been no study.
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors,
and are not to be construed as official, or as reflecting the views of the U.S.
Department of the Army or the U.S. Department of Defense.
1908
www.aacrjournals.org
References
1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Devesa SS, McGlynn KA, Moller H.
Interpreting the international trends in testicular seminoma and nonseminoma incidence. Nat Clin Pract Urol
2006;3:53243.
2. McGlynn KA. Environmental and host factors in
testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer Invest 2001;19:84253.
3. Dieckmann KP, Pichlmeier U. Clinical epidemiology of
testicular germ cell tumors. World J Urol 2004;22:214.
4. Skakkebaek NE, Berthelsen JG, Giwercman A, Muller J.
Carcinoma-in-situ of the testis: possible origin from
gonocytes and precursor of all types of germ cell
tumours except spermatocytoma. Int J Androl 1987;10:
1928.
5. Toppari J, Kaleva M. Maldescendus testis. Horm Res
1999;51:2619.
6. Rajpert-De Meyts E, Bartkova J, Samson M, et al. The
emerging phenotype of the testicular carcinoma in situ
germ cell. APMIS 2003;111:26778.
7. Toppari J, Virtanen H, Skakkebaek NE, Main KM.
Environmental effects on hormonal regulation of
testicular descent. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2006;
102:1846.
8. Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, et al. Male
reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens.
Environ Health Perspect 1996;104 Suppl 4:741803.
9. Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM.
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental
aspects. Hum Reprod 2001;16:9728.
10. McGlynn KA, Quraishi SM, Graubard BI, Weber JP,
Rubertone MV, Erickson RL. Persistent organochlorine
pesticides and risk of testicular germ cell tumors. J Natl
Cancer Inst 2008;100:66371.
11. Kelce WR, Stone CR, Laws SC, Gray LE, Kemppainen
JA, Wilson EM. Persistent DDT metabolite p,p-DDE is a
potent androgen receptor antagonist. Nature 1995;375:
5815.
12. Ulbrich B, Stahlmann R. Developmental toxicity of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): a systematic review of
experimental data. Arch Toxicol 2004;78:25268.
13. Hardell L, van Bavel B, Lindstrom G, et al. Increased
concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls, hexachlorobenzene, and chlordanes in mothers of men with
testicular cancer. Environ Health Perspect 2003;111:9304.
www.aacrjournals.org
1909
Abstract
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are industrial chemicals used in various applications requiring
chemical stabilityand have now become widely dispersed. Their characteristics of persistence, low
water/higher lipid solubility, contribute to their ability to bioconcentrate and bioaccumulate.
Traditionally PCBs have been regulated as food contaminants and the general population is
primarily exposed by that route. PCBs in foodstuffs are generally higher chlorinated, resistant to
metabolic breakdown, and elicit toxic changes that are thought to be predominantly receptor/
parent PCB-driven. But for certain occupational exposures, and for those persons residing or
working in contaminated buildings, and in large cities, an inhalation route of exposure may
predominate. Airborne PCBs are, in contrast to foodborne PCBs, lower chlorinated, more volatile,
and subject to metabolic attack. In this review, we have explored (geno-) toxic manifestations of
PCBs typical of those found in air. Here metabolic conversion of the parent PCB to hydroxylated
and other metabolic progeny appear to play a dominant role, especially in genotoxicity. We should
be cognizant of the impact of exposures to airborne PCBs for those individuals who are
occupationally exposed, for persons living near contaminated sites, for those who work or go to
school in contaminated buildings, and especially cognizant of the young, the socio-economically
disadvantaged and medically-underserved or nutritionally-deficient populations.
PCBs have been commercially manufactured since the 1920s for use as dielectrics in
transformers and capacitors, as cooling fluids in hydraulic systems, in the formulation of
lubricating and cutting oils, in pesticides and flame retardants, and as plasticizers in paints,
copying paper, adhesives, sealants and plastics [1,2]. The stability of these compounds, one
of their commercial attributes, has led to their worldwide distribution in the environment, as
first reported by Jensen in 1966 [3]. The production of PCBs peaked in the 1970s and has
steadily declined thereafter as many countries throughout the world have banned their use or
limited their production. Nevertheless these compounds remain in use today in our
environment and represent a potential human health hazard [46].
An overlooked source of PCB exposure is airborne PCBs. Regular monitoring of
environmental PCBs in water, fish, and sediment of the Great Lakes and other regions in the
US started in the 1980s [7]. Such non-atmospheric sources of PCBs are carefully monitored
Larry W. Robertson, Ph.D., M.P.H., Director, IDGP in Human Toxicology, Professor, Department of Occupational and
Environmental Health The University of Iowa, College of Public Health, 100 Oakdale Campus #219 IREH, Iowa City, Iowa
52242-5000, Phone: 319-335-4554, Fax: 319-335-4290, larry-robertson@uiowa.edu
Gabriele Ludewig, Dr. rer. nat., Associate Professor, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health The University of Iowa,
College of Public Health, 100 Oakdale Campus #214 IREH, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-5000, Phone: 319-335-4650, Fax: 319-335-4290,
gabriele-ludewig@uiowa.edu
Page 2
and regulated. Air as a source of PCB exposure, however, was nearly completely ignored
until a decade ago. Systematic measurements of atmospheric PCBs started only in the
1990s. The first urban monitoring site in the USA was installed in Chicago in 1995. The
level of PCB contamination in the air is strongly influenced by temperature. In Chicago air
concentrations between 100300 pg/m3 in winter and up to 5,00016,000 pg/m3 on hot
summer days were reported (reviewed in [8]). The levels at the sources of these atmospheric
PCBs may even be significantly higher. Inhalation exposure is considered to be a major
route of occupational exposure to PCBs, and it was estimated that in capacitor workers, for
example, a maximum of 80% of adipose PCBs may have been absorbed by inhalation
exposure [9]. Recently high levels of PCBs were measured in indoor air in buildings
constructed in the 1970s using joint sealants that contained 49% PCBs. Indoor air
concentrations up to 13,000 ng/m3 were measured in some classrooms of a contaminated
school [10], which is more than an order of magnitude above the NIOSH guidelines of 1 pg/
m3 for occupational settings. Other possible sources for indoor PCBs are believed to be data
screen terminals [11], ceiling tiles and fluorescent lights [12]. It was reported that the
concentration of PCBs in indoor air can be at least an order of magnitude higher than
outdoor air [1315], however, regional outdoor levels can be very high due to activities like
building renovations, dredging, or contamination from cement factory exhaust [1618]. The
serum levels of workers engaged in sealant removal was 210 times higher at the end of
these activities than they had been one year before [19]. Thus under certain circumstances
the intake from inhalation exposure exceeds PCB intake from food.
PCBs in foods, like fish or mothers milk, and in human adipose tissue are usually the higher
chlorinated ones, where congeners like PCBs 153, 180, 183 and others predominate.
Airborne PCBs are very different, since they require volatilization. Major congeners in
Chicago air, for example, are lower congeners, like PCBs 4, 8, 11, 18, 28, 52, 95, 112, to
name some (Figure 1) [20]. As a consequence of this difference, in two populations in Italy
the more urban group had significantly higher levels of lower chlorinated PCBs (PCB52 was
about 100-fold higher) than the population in a more rural environment [21]. In Germany,
PCB28 and PCB52 were the prevailing congeners in indoor air of contaminated schools
[10,22]. Elevated levels of PCB28 and PCB52 were measured in the blood of teachers from
these schools compared to non-contaminated schools, whereas the mean blood levels of
higher chlorinated PCBs, i.e. PCB138, 153 and 180 were almost identical [22]. Children in
schools with 690 20,800 ng PCB/m3 air had median levels of 6, 9, and 5 ng/l PCB28, 52,
and 101, respectively, whereas children in non-contaminated schools had levels below the
detection level of 1 ng/L [23]. Both groups had no significant differences in PCB138, 153
and 180 levels, indicating that indoor air exposure contributed to the PCB body burden. In
Germany the non-occupational tolerable indoor air PCB concentration was set at 300 ng/m3
based on a tolerable daily intake (TDI) of a total of 1 ug/kg body weight [24]. Not only were
these levels exceeded in several schools, but this TDI is also based on a chronic toxicity
study with a commercial PCB mixture, which measured hepatic enzyme induction as
endpoint [25]. Airborne PCB profiles are distinctly different from those of commercial PCB
mixtures, like Aroclor 1254, and enzyme induction in the liver is an inappropriate endpoint
of toxicity for inhalation exposure of airborne PCBs.
2. Carcinogenicity of PCBs
PCBs have been categorized by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as
Probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A) [26], and by the National Toxicology
Program 11th Report on Carcinogens as Reasonably anticipated to be human carcinogens.
A detailed summary of the health effects of PCBs was prepared for the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and published in 1990 as a Toxicological Profile
[27]. Other detailed reviews are available in the literature, emphasizing animal data, human
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 3
studies, and mechanistic studies of the genotoxic effects of PCB individual congeners and
mixtures [1,28,29]. A summary of recommendations for selected IARC-classified agents
was recently published [30,31].
The process of carcinogenesis in many, if not all, tissues involves at least two stages,
initiation and promotion, based on observations originally seen in mouse skin and later
demonstrated in other tissues [32,33]. Mechanistically, an initiator has been defined as an
agent which irreversibly alters the DNA sequence (i.e. a genotoxic compound), whereas a
promoter has been defined as an agent that alters the expression of genetic information
(epigenetic changes) in the cell [33]. Although their potency varies, the various commercial
halogenated biphenyl mixtures have been uniformly reported to have promoting activity in
various liver models [29,34]. It had been widely assumed that PCBs do not have initiating
activity, but in several studies Oesterle and Deml consistently found a small number of
enzyme altered foci in livers of rats treated only with the PCB mixture Clophen A50
(reviewed in [35]). The same was noted for the brominated biphenyl mixture fireMaster
BP-6 [36]. Hayes and coworkers had used the modified Solt-Farber initiation-selection
protocol to investigate the initiating activity of several PCBs and mixtures [37], with
negative results. Our mechanistic studies predicted that the choice of PCBs in the Hayes
study was not fortuitous, because the selected PCBs were so slowly metabolized that
detection of initiating events was precluded. Our data, however, clearly show that several
lower chlorinated PCB congeners and two PCB3 metabolites are positive in this initiation
assay [38,39]. In addition, the brominated congener 3,3,4,4-tetrabromo-biphenyl (PBB77)
was found to have both, initiating and promoting activity [40]. Because the long term
administration of PCB mixtures and certain congeners leads to the development of hepatic
tumors, PCBs by definition have both initiating and promoting activities. Besides liver
tumors, several PCB mixtures and congeners were reported to also promote lung tumors in a
mice model [41,42] and to cause lung tumors in long term rat studies conducted by the
National Toxicology Program (NTP), something to keep in mind in connection with
airborne PCBs. PCBs are classified as proven animal carcinogens and probable human
carcinogens. The risk of airborne exposure for human health is just beginning to receive the
attention that it deserves. It is the intent of the authors to devote the space below to issues
related to lower chlorinated PCBs, as predominate in air, and their adverse effects,
especially related to genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
It has long been recognized that biphenyl and halogenated biphenyls, particularly the lower
chlorinated congeners, are hydroxylated in vivo and in vitro (see review by [43]). These
hydroxylation reactions are primarily catalyzed by isoforms of cytochrome P-450. Our
experiments with PCB3 (4-chlorobiphenyl) and rat liver microsomes showed that five
mono- and three di-hydroxy metabolites were formed [44]. The metabolism of PCB3 by
cytochrome P-450 probably involves an arene oxide intermediate [43,45]. Other arene
oxides could be involved in the oxidation of the mono- to the di-hydroxy forms. Arene
oxides are strong electrophiles which may react with critical cellular targets. The
dihydroxybiphenyls may be further oxidized by various enzymes like peroxidases [46],
prostaglandin synthase [47] and cytochrome P-450s to the corresponding quinones with the
formation of a semiquinone intermediate. Ortho- and para-quinones are formed from diOHPCB3 in vitro and demonstrate high reactivity toward nitrogen and especially sulfur
nucleophiles [48]. Other experiments demonstrated that the microsomal metabolism of
PCB3 resulted in the formation of adducts with nucleotides in vitro, preferentially with
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 4
purines rather than pyrimidines [45]. Most likely at least 1 of the 4 adducts seen is derived
from an arene oxide intermediate, the 3 other adducts after further oxidation probably from a
quinone [45]. These results suggest that several metabolic pathways and chemical species
could be involved in PCB-induced DNA adduction, without, however, telling us exactly
which enzymes or metabolites are involved.
The formation of PCB-DNA adducts was also reported in cellular systems [49], and studies
in vivo demonstrated covalent binding of radiolabeled PCB metabolites to nucleic acids
[5052]. The assumption that PCBs are not mutagenic is based on very little (and often
contradictory) data. Of 209 possible congeneric PCBs, only five congeners, one bromo-, a
few fluoro-biphenyls and five commercial PCB mixtures have been tested in the Ames
bacterial mutagenicity test. Most tests gave negative results, however, Aroclor 1221, 4bromobiphenyl, and some lower fluorinated biphenyls were positive [53]. The mutational
spectra gave evidence for two mutagenic species. The reported positive effects with PCB3
[54] were not confirmed by Schoeny [55]. Thus lower halogenated biphenyls may or may
not be mutagenic in bacteria, but it should be considered that the Ames test is insensitive
towards whole groups of compounds, like DES, benzene and reactive oxygen species
(ROS). One recent publication reported a small, but significant increase in lac I mutations in
livers of transgenic (BigBlue) mice after exposure to Aroclor 1253 [56]. Clearly this and
other mutagenicity tests, including those that measure chromosome mutations and genome
changes, and an analysis of more congeners is needed.
Recently we have shown that several PCB3 metabolites induce gene mutations,
chromosome breaks, chromosome loss and polyploidization in cells in culture and we
provided the first evidence that a PCB congener is mutagenic in vivo. As seen, the early
attempts to measure the genotoxicity of PCBs did not account for bioactivation of lower
chlorinated congeners. Clearly, under the right metabolic conditions certain lower
chlorinated PCBs can be bioactivated to genotoxins. The questions remain, which are the
active metabolites, which kinds of genotoxic damage are important, what are the
mechanisms of these genotoxicities, and are these issues really relevant for inhalation
exposure situations as those in our inner cities and contaminated buildings?
A series of PCB3 metabolites were tested in various genotoxicity assays to determine their
activity and genotoxicity profile. Both, the 3,4- and particularly the 2,5-quinone were very
efficacious and potent inducers of gene mutations at the HPRT locus (Table 1). Neither of
the corresponding dihydroxy metabolites nor the phenols had any activity in this assay. The
2,5-quinone (2,5-pQ) was also by far the most potent and efficacious inducer of
chromosome breaks as determined by Crest-negative micronuclei induction. This suggests
that at least some of the HPRT gene mutations may be due to breaks in the X-chromosome.
The ortho-quinone (3,4-oQ), 3,4- (3,4-Cat) and 2,5-dihydroxy (2,5-HQ) and 4-monohydroxy
metabolites (4-OH) induced some chromosome breaks at the highest concentration tested,
but their by far stronger activity was the induction of chromosome loss (Crest-positive
micronuclei). In this respect 4-OH and 2-OH were the most potent metabolites tested, while
the dihydroxy and quinone metabolites produced significant chromosome loss at more than
10-fold lower concentrations (above results were published in [57]. Two unique effects
stand out: only one metabolite, the 3,4-catechol, induced sister chromatid exchanges (SCE),
and only the 2,5-hydroquinone (2,5-HQ) caused tetraploidization of cells, and this with an
efficacy of nearly 100% at 7.5 M concentration [58]. Tetraploidization followed by uneven
chromosome loss is believed to be a major pathway of carcinogenesis. The mystery
surrounding this polyploidization is, however, the mechanism by which it occurs. According
to the staining pattern (all dark) the cells were not in the second M-phase as they should be.
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 5
Time-lapse microscopy showed that these cells were arrested in first G2/M, but then went
out of G2/M and shortly afterwards fused with surrounding cells. This intriguing observation
is under further analysis.
Very interesting also is the fact that 2,5-HQ and its oxidation product 2,5-pQ have such
different profiles. To gain further insight into the mechanism and potential organ specificity
of effects, two cell lines were employed that differ in their amount of myeloperoxidase
(MPO), an enzyme found in bone marrow cells and others and expected to oxidize
hydroquinones to quinones. The 2,5-pQ induced DNA strand breaks, measured with the
COMET assay, in both cell lines and at 37 and 6C; The 2,5-pQ also increased intracellular
ROS while decreasing GSH levels. On the other hand 2,5-HQ induced COMETs and ROS
only in MPO-positive HL-60 cells and at 37C, indicating that this metabolite needs to be
bioactivated by MPO [59].
These results show that metabolites of PCB3 are indeed genotoxic and that each metabolite
induces its own, specific type of DNA damage. What these results do not explain is the
mechanism of genotoxicity for the individual endpoints, whether this is of any importance in
vivo or which metabolic activation pathway(s) could be leading to these effects. To address
these questions, male transgenic BigBlue rats were injected ip with PCB3, 4OH-PCB3, 3methylcholanthrene (3-MC), or corn oil and the induction of point mutations was analyzed
in the lacI indicator gene. PCB3 increased the mutation frequency in the liver (significantly)
and lung (non-significantly) of BigBlue rats, and changed the mutation spectrum in both
organs from predominantly transitions to predominantly to GC TA transversions. 4OHPCB3 had a similar, but smaller and effect that was below the level of statistical significance
[60,61]. Female rats were by far less susceptible to mutation induction in the liver,
reminding us that gender differences have to be considered [62] This demonstrates that this
PCB congener is mutagenic in vivo in the target organ liver and most likely also in the lung.
However, this still does not explain the mechanism of genotoxicity (DNA adduction or
ROS?), the metabolic activation pathway (ortho- or para-quinone, or epoxide or other
metabolite?), or whether the most likely route of exposure, inhalation of contaminated
indoor or outdoor air, may pose a significant risk for carcinogenicity in humans.
There is considerable evidence that lower chlorinated PCBs produce reactive oxygen species
(ROS) and intracellular oxidative stress [46,63]. Free radicals, particularly hydroxyl
radicals, may produce 8-oxodeoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), a DNA lesion that is highly
mutagenic, producing G T transversions [64]. Hydroxyl radicals can also attack fatty
acids (linoleic acid, linolinic acid, oleic acid, etc) and form lipid peroxidation-derived enals,
such as acrolein, crotonaldehyde, trans-4-OH-2-nonenal (4-HNE), and malondialdehyde
(MDA) [65]. These products can then modify DNA bases, resulting in cyclic adducts by
interaction of their difunctional groups with NH2 group in dA, dG ordC residues in DNA
[6668]. These cyclic adducts are mutagenic, producing base substitutions and deletions, for
example G T mutations from propano-dG and C A mutations from various etheno
adducts [64,69,70]. Therefore the question of mutagenicity of PCBs, especially congeners
that are prone to metabolic activation to redox cycling intermediates, like those from
airborne PCBs, should be re-analyzed.
Page 6
coworkers [73] also tested two congeners, 3,3,4,4-tetrachlorobiphenyl (TCB; PCB77) and
2,2,5,5-TCB (PCB 52) and found chromosome breakage and rearrangements with both and
a more-than-additive effect in combinations of the two PCBs in human lymphocytes in vitro.
Both congeners also induced preneoplastic foci and chromosome aberrations in rats in vivo,
and the combination of the congeners again had a more than additive effect [74,75]. The
most common types of aberrations were trisomy of chromosome 1 on its long arm and
monosomy of chromosome 3 on its short arm. Specific chromosome aberrations and
hepatocellular carcinoma correlated so that they hypothesized that genes involved in the
development of hepatic carcinoma may reside in chromosome 1 and/or 3 of the rat [75].
These data indicate that we need to better understand the mechanism of these effects and
structure-activity relationships for all PCB congeners, if we want to understand the cancer
risks associated with daily inhalation exposure to PCB congeners that may be bioactivated to
clastogens and aneugens. Our experiments with PCB3 metabolites are a first step in that
direction, but more work needs to be done.
Telomeres are small but very important segments of chromosomes that are needed for
chromosome stability. PCB3 and the two metabolites tested, 2,5-quinone and 3,4-diOH
catechol, cause telomere shortening [76]. The effect was strong in TERT-immortalized
human primary fibroblasts and immortal keratinocytes (HaCaT) and not significant in
human primary fibroblasts, possibly because senescence started to interfere at the end of the
experiment. Shortening of telomeres would indicate that cells exposed to these compounds
may senesce prematurely in animals/humans.
Also measured was telomerase activity in cells exposed for 6 h to PCB3-2,5pQ and
PCB3-3,4diOH. A significant increase in activity in HaCaT and TERT-immortalized
fibroblasts was found. PCB3 did not increase the telomerase activity in HaCaT at the very
high concentration tested. These findings seem to contradict each other, since an increased
telomerase activity should prevent telomere shortening, which was observed with the same
compounds after 6 and 12 weeks of exposure. However, telomerase activity was measured
early, after only 6 h of exposure, and may not be maintained for long and of course, why and
how was telomerase activity increased: a feed-back mechanism signaling that the telomerase
is not functioning correctly, a consequence of signaling pathway activation, a consequence
of transient c-myc or growth factor activation?
Another puzzling aspect is the fact that not only the quinone, but also the mother compound,
PCB3 itself, reduced telomere length. The quinone was expected to produce intracellular
oxidative stress, a factor known to produce telomere shortening [77]. In addition, the
quinone can bind to DNA (and presumably RNA) and to proteins [45,48], which could
interfere with the telomerase function. The 3,4diOH metabolite is expected to be oxidized
with the formation of ROS and reactive semiquinone-quinone. PCB3 on the other hand is
not very reactive. Since these first observations we now have evidence that several
additional PCB congeners cause a shortening of the telomeres and, during long-term
exposure (14 weeks), to a reduction in telomerase activity in immortal human HaCaT
keratinocytes (Senthilkumar et al, unpublished results). Since stem cells and the basal cells
of permanently proliferating tissues like skin and GI tract express and depend on telomerase
activity [7880], a chronic exposure to these PCB congeners could have so far unrecognized
consequences.
Overall these new observations are extremely interesting; they pose a number of important
questions that need to be answered: what is the mechanism of telomere shortening by these
different compounds?; what is the cause of telomerase activity increase or decrease and how
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 7
persistent is it?; which PCB congeners and metabolites have this effect ? and can we deduce
a structure-activity relationship?, which in tern may help us to unravel the mechanism(s).
Obviously we are only at the beginning of extended series of experiments that are needed to
understand the risk that PCBs may cause through this newly discovered mechanism. If we
understand the effects of PCBs on the telomerase complex (hTERT and its RNA template,
hTR) we will be better equipped to understand the need to include telomere/telomerase
research in the analysis of the effects of many man-made compounds.
The importance of airborne PCBs is now becoming understood. A PubMed search with the 2
keywords PCB and air produced 136 hits for the three most recent years (20072009)
alone, more than in the three previous decades (1970s 90s) together. Little is known,
however, about the toxicity of these airborne PCBs and the consequences of exposure by
inhalation compared to ingestion. Airborne PCBs are lower chlorinated and therefore
relatively easily metabolized. This results in low levels of those PCB congeners detectable
in blood, but at the same time provides bioactivated intermediates. Although our daily
exposure to these airborne PCBs may be low under most circumstances, children playing
near Superfund sites in hot summer days, workers moving dried dredging material or
demolishing buildings containing PCBs, or families living unknowingly in buildings with
high indoor PCB concentrations, may be exposed to significant levels of these airborne
PCBs for extended periods of time. We should strive to understand the potential risks of
such exposure, and to understand the mechanisms of toxicity, so that we can devise
recommendations, protective strategies, predictions about possible susceptibility factors and/
or interactions with other compounds. Very often Superfund sites, contaminated buildings,
and multiple chemical exposures are found in poor neighborhoods, with medically
underserved and nutritionally deficient children. Understanding and, if needed, ameliorating
the risks is a matter of environmental justice and social responsibility.
Acknowledgments
Many of the studies referenced and cited in this short review were supported by funding from NIH (ES 013661, ES
05605). The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect an official policy of the granting
agencies. The authors recognize that the research summarized here would have not been possible without the
dedicated hard work of graduate students, postdocs and staff. Their contributions are gratefully acknowledged.
References
NIH-PA Author Manuscript
1. Ludewig, G.; Esch, H.; Robertson, LW. Polyhalogenierte Bi- und Terphenyle. In: Dunkelberg, H.;
Gebel, T.; Hartwig, A., editors. Handbuch der Lebensmitteltoxikologie. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim:
2007. p. 1031-1094.
2. WHO. Environmenal Health Criteria 2. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 1976. Polychlorinated
Biphenyls and Terphenyls; p. 85
3. Jensen S. A new chemical hazard. New Sci. 1966; 32:612.
4. Hu D, Hornbuckle KC. Inadvertent polychlorinated biphenyls in commercial paint pigments.
Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44:28227. [PubMed: 19957996]
5. Hu D, Martinez A, Hornbuckle KC. Discovery of non-aroclor PCB (3,3-dichlorobiphenyl) in
Chicago air. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42:78737. [PubMed: 19031874]
6. Rodenburg LA, Guo J, Du S, Cavallo GJ. Evidence for unique and ubiquitous environmental
sources of 3,3-dichlorobiphenyl (PCB 11). Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44:281621. [PubMed:
20384375]
7. Schneider AR, Stapleton HM, Cornwell J, Baker JE. Recent declines in PAH, PCB, and toxaphene
levels in the northern Great Lakes as determined from high resolution sediment cores.
Environmental Science & Technology. 2001; 35:38093815. [PubMed: 11642437]
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 8
8. Hornbuckle, KC.; Carlson, DL.; Swackhamer, DL.; Baker, JE.; Eisenreich, SJ. Polychlorinated
Biphenyls in the Great Lakes. In: Hites, RA., editor. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry.
Vol. 5. Springer-Verlag; Berlin/Heidelberg: 2006. p. 13-70.
9. Wolff MS. Occupational exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Environ Health Perspect.
1985; 60:1338. [PubMed: 3928344]
10. Kohler M, Zennegg M, Waeber R. Coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in indoor air.
Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36:473540. [PubMed: 12487293]
11. Digernes V, Astrup EG. Are datascreen terminals a source of increased PCB-concentrations in the
working atmosphere? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1982; 49:1937. [PubMed: 6461609]
12. Harris MG. PCB exposure from fluorescent lights. Am J Public Health. 1985; 75:892. [PubMed:
3927757]
13. Balfanz E, Fuchs J, Kieper H. Sampling and analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in indoor
air due to permanently elastic sealants. Chemosphere. 1993; 26:871880.
14. Vorhees DJ, Cullen AC, Altshul LM. Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls in residential indoor
air and outdoor air near a Superfund site. Environ Sci Technol. 1997; 31:36123618.
15. Wallace JC, Basu I, Hites RA. Sampling and analysis artifacts caused by elevated indoor air
polychlorinated biphenyl concentrations. Environ Sci Technol. 1996; 30:27302734.
16. Cullen AC, Altshul LM, Vorhees DJ. Effect of sediment remediation on polychlorinated biphenyl
concentrations in tomatoes grown near New Bedford Harbor. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2007;
3:48490. [PubMed: 18046797]
17. Ishikawa Y, Noma Y, Mori Y, Sakai S. Congener profiles of PCB and a proposed new set of
indicator congeners. Chemosphere. 2007; 67:183851. [PubMed: 17267022]
18. Jartun M, Ottesen RT, Steinnes E, Volden T. Painted surfaces--important sources of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination to the urban and marine environment. Environ
Pollut. 2009; 157:295302. [PubMed: 18706746]
19. Kontsas H, Pekari K, Riala R, Back B, Rantio T, Priha E. Worker exposure to polychlorinated
biphenyls in elastic polysulphide sealant renovation. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004; 48:515. [PubMed:
14718345]
20. Zhao HX, Adamcakova-Dodd A, Hu D, Hornbuckle KC, Just CL, Robertson LW, Thorne PS,
Lehmler HJ. Development of a synthetic PCB mixture resembling the average polychlorinated
biphenyl profile in Chicago air. Environ Int. 2010; 36:81927. [PubMed: 19375801]
21. Turci R, Finozzi E, Catenacci G, Marinaccio A, Balducci C, Minoia C. Reference values of
coplanar and non-coplanar PCBs in serum samples from two Italian population groups. Toxicol
Lett. 2006; 162:2505. [PubMed: 16242275]
22. Schwenk M, Gabrio T, Papke O, Wallenhorst T. Human biomonitoring of polychlorinated
biphenyls and polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofuranes in teachers working in a PCBcontaminated school. Chemosphere. 2002; 47:22933. [PubMed: 11993638]
23. Liebl B, Schettgen T, Kerscher G, Broding HC, Otto A, Angerer J, Drexler H. Evidence for
increased internal exposure to lower chlorinated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in pupils
attending a contaminated school. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2004; 207:31524. [PubMed:
15471095]
24. ARGEBAU. Projektgruppe Schadstoffe der Fachkommission Baunormung. Richtlinie fur die
Bewertung und Sanierung PCB-belasteter Baustoffe und Bauteile in Gebauden (PCB-Richtlinie).
DIBt-Mitt. 1995:41 .
25. Chen T, Dubois K. Studies on the enzyme inducing effects of PCBs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol.
1973; 26:504512. [PubMed: 4203826]
26. IARC. Overall evaluations of carcinogenicity: an updating of IARCmonographs volumes 1 to 42.
IARC Mongr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1987; 7(suppl):1440.
27. ATSDR. Toxicological profile for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). 1990.
28. Safe S. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs),
and related compounds: environmental and mechanistic considerations which support the
development of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs). Crit Rev Toxicol. 1990; 21:5188. [PubMed:
2124811]
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 9
29. Silberhorn EM, Glauert HP, Robertson LW. Carcinogenicity of polyhalogenated biphenyls: PCBs
and PBBs. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1990; 20:44096. [PubMed: 2165409]
30. Robertson, LW.; Ruder, AM. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). IARC; 2010. p. 166-183.
31. Ward EM, Schulte PA, Straif K, Hopf NB, Caldwell JC, Carreon T, DeMarini DM, Fowler BA,
Goldstein BD, Hemminki K, Hines CJ, Pursiainen KH, Kuempel E, Lewtas J, Lunn RM, Lynge E,
McElvenny DM, Muhle H, Nakajima T, Robertson LW, Rothman N, Ruder AM, SchubauerBerigan MK, Siemiatycki J, Silverman D, Smith MT, Sorahan T, Steenland K, Stevens RG, Vineis
P, Zahm SH, Zeise L, Cogliano VJ. Research recommendations for selected IARC-classified
agents. Environ Health Perspect. 2010; 118:135562. [PubMed: 20562050]
32. Diamond L, OBrien TG, Baird WM. Tumor promoters and the mechanism of tumor promotion.
Adv Cancer Res. 1980; 32:174. [PubMed: 7008542]
33. Pitot HC, Sirica AE. The stages of initiation and promotion in hepatocarcinogenesis. Biochim
Biophys Acta. 1980; 605:191215. [PubMed: 6249365]
34. Glauert, HP.; Robertson, LW.; Silberhorn, EM. PCBs and Tumor Promotion. In: Robertson, LW.;
Hansen, LG., editors. PCBs Recent Advances in Environmental Toxicology & Health Effects. The
University Press of Kentucky; Lexington, KY: 2001. p. 355-371.
35. Ludewig, G. Cancer Initiation by PCBs. In: Robertson, LW.; Hansen, LG., editors. PCBs Recent
Advances in Environmental Toxicology & Health Effects. The University Press of Kentucky;
Lexington, KY: 2002. p. 337-354.
36. Jensen RK, Sleight SD, Aust SD. Effect of varying the length of exposure to polybrominated
biphenyls on the development of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase enzyme-altered foci.
Carcinogenesis. 1984; 5:636. [PubMed: 6140088]
37. Hayes MA, Safe SH, Armstrong D, Cameron RG. Influence of cell proliferation on initiating
activity of pure polychlorinated biphenyls and complex mixtures in resistant hepatocyte in vivo
assays for carcinogenicity. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985; 74:103741. [PubMed: 2860266]
38. Espandiari P, Glauert HP, Lehmler HJ, Lee EY, Srinivasan C, Robertson LW. Polychlorinated
biphenyls as initiators in liver carcinogenesis: resistant hepatocyte model. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol. 2003; 186:5562. [PubMed: 12583993]
39. Espandiari P, Glauert HP, Lehmler HJ, Lee EY, Srinivasan C, Robertson LW. Initiating activity of
4-chlorobiphenyl metabolites in the resistant hepatocyte model. Toxicol Sci. 2004; 79:416.
[PubMed: 14976334]
40. Dixon D, Sleight SD, Aust SD, Rezabek MS. Tumor-promoting, initiating, and hepatotoxic effects
of 3,3,4,4-tetrabromobiphenyl (34-TBB) in rats. J Am Coll Toxicol. 1988; 7:687697.
41. Anderson LM, Logsdon D, Ruskie S, Fox SD, Issaq HJ, Kovatch RM, Riggs CM. Promotion by
polychlorinated biphenyls of lung and liver tumors in mice. Carcinogenesis. 1994; 15:22458.
[PubMed: 7955061]
42. Anderson LM, Ward JM, Fox SD, Isaaq HJ, Riggs CW. Effects of a single dose of polychlorinated
biphenyls to infant mice on N-nitrosodimethylamine-initiated lung and liver tumors. Int J Cancer.
1986; 38:10916. [PubMed: 3087890]
43. Safe, S. Metabolism, uptake, storage and bioaccumulation. In: Kimbrough; Jensen, editors.
Halogenated Biphenyls, Terphenyls, Naphthalens, Dibenzodioxins and Related Products. Elsevier;
New York: 1989.
44. McLean MR, Bauer U, Amaro AR, Robertson LW. Identification of catechol and hydroquinone
metabolites of 4-monochlorobiphenyl. Chem Res Toxicol. 1996; 9:15864. [PubMed: 8924585]
45. McLean MR, Robertson LW, Gupta RC. Detection of PCB adducts by the 32P-postlabeling
technique. Chem Res Toxicol. 1996; 9:16571. [PubMed: 8924587]
46. Oakley GG, Devanaboyina U, Robertson LW, Gupta RC. Oxidative DNA damage induced by
activation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): implications for PCB-induced oxidative stress in
breast cancer. Chem Res Toxicol. 1996; 9:128592. [PubMed: 8951230]
47. Wangpradit O, Mariappan SV, Teesch LM, Duffel MW, Norstrom K, Robertson LW, Luthe G.
Oxidation of 4-chlorobiphenyl metabolites to electrophilic species by prostaglandin H synthase.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2009; 22:6471. [PubMed: 19105592]
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 10
48. Amaro AR, Oakley GG, Bauer U, Spielmann HP, Robertson LW. Metabolic activation of PCBs to
quinones: reactivity toward nitrogen and sulfur nucleophiles and influence of superoxide
dismutase. Chem Res Toxicol. 1996; 9:6239. [PubMed: 8728508]
49. Dubois M, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A, Grosse Y, Kremers P. DNA adducts and P450 induction in
human, rat and avian liver cells after exposure to polychlorobiphenyls. Mutat Res. 1995; 345:181
90. [PubMed: 8552139]
50. Daubeze M, Narbonne JF. Incorporation of labeled 2,4,5,2,4,5-hexachlorobiphenyl into the
nuclear fraction of rat hepatocytes in vivo. Toxicology. 1984; 31:3158. [PubMed: 6204423]
51. Morales NM, Matthews HB. In vivo binding of 2,3,6,2,3,6-hexachlorobiphenyl and 2,4,5,2,4,5hexachlorobiphenyl to mouse liver macromolecules. Chem Biol Interact. 1979; 27:99110.
[PubMed: 113111]
52. Pereg D, Tampal N, Espandiari P, Robertson LW. Distribution and macromolecular binding of
benzo[a]pyrene and two polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in female mice. Chem Biol Interact.
2001; 137:24358. [PubMed: 11566292]
53. Glatt H, Anklam E, Robertson LW. Biphenyl and fluorinated derivatives: liver enzyme-mediated
mutagenicity detected in Salmonella typhimurium and Chinese hamster V79 cells. Mutat Res.
1992; 281:1516. [PubMed: 1371835]
54. Wyndham C, Devenish J, Safe S. The in vitro metabolism, macromolecular binding and bacterial
mutagenicity of 4-chloribiphenyl, a model PCB substrate. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol.
1976; 15:56370. [PubMed: 825937]
55. Schoeny R. Mutagenicity testing of chlorinated biphenyls and chlorinated dibenzofurans. Mutat
Res. 1982; 101:4556. [PubMed: 7043248]
56. Davies R, Clothier B, Smith AG. Mutation frequency in the lacI gene of liver DNA from lambda/
lacI transgenic mice following the interaction of PCBs with iron causing hepatic cancer and
porphyria. Mutagenesis. 2000; 15:37983. [PubMed: 10970442]
57. Zettner MA, Flor S, Ludewig G, Wagner J, Robertson LW, Lehmann L. Quinoid metabolites of 4monochlorobiphenyl induce gene mutations in cultured Chinese hamster v79 cells. Toxicol Sci.
2007; 100:8898. [PubMed: 17686921]
58. Flor S, Ludewig G. Polyploidy-induction by dihydroxylated monochlorobiphenyls: structureactivity-relationships. Environ Int. 2010; 36:9629. [PubMed: 20471090]
59. Xie W, Wang K, Robertson LW, Ludewig G. Investigation of mechanism(s) of DNA damage
induced by 4-monochlorobiphenyl (PCB3) metabolites. Environ Int. 2010; 36:95061. [PubMed:
20129669]
60. Lehmann L, HLE, PAK, LWR, Ludewig G. 4-monochlorobiphenyl (PCB3) induces mutations in
the livers of transgenic Fisher 344 rats. Carcinogenesis. 2007; 28:4718. [PubMed: 16950798]
61. Maddox C, Wang B, Kirby PA, Wang K, Ludewig G. Mutagenicity of 3-Methylcholanthrene,
PCB3, and 4-OH-PCB3 in the Lung of Transgenic Bigblue Rats. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol.
2008; 25:260266. [PubMed: 18438460]
62. Jacobus JA, Wang B, Maddox C, Esch H, Lehmann L, Robertson LW, Wang K, Kirby P, Ludewig
G. 3-Methylcholanthrene (3-MC) and 4-chlorobiphenyl (PCB3) genotoxicity is gender-related in
Fischer 344 transgenic rats. Environ Int. 2010; 36:9709. [PubMed: 20739065]
63. Srinivasan A, Lehmler HJ, Robertson LW, Ludewig G. Production of DNA strand breaks in vitro
and reactive oxygen species in vitro and in HL-60 cells by PCB metabolites. Toxicol Sci. 2001;
60:92102. [PubMed: 11222876]
64. Marnett LJ, Burcham PC. Endogenous DNA adducts: potential and paradox. Chem Res Toxicol.
1993; 6:77185. [PubMed: 8117915]
65. Nair J, Barbin A, Velic I, Bartsch H. Etheno DNA-base adducts from endogenous reactive species.
Mutat Res. 1999; 424:5969. [PubMed: 10064850]
66. Chaudhary AK, Nokubo M, Marnett LJ, Blair IA. Analysis of the malondialdehyde-2deoxyguanosine adduct in rat liver DNA by gas chromatography/electron capture negative
chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Biol Mass Spectrom. 1994; 23:45764. [PubMed:
7918689]
67. Chung FL, Chen HJ, Nath RG. Lipid peroxidation as a potential endogenous source for the
formation of exocyclic DNA adducts. Carcinogenesis. 1996; 17:210511. [PubMed: 8895475]
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Page 11
68. Winter CK, Segall HJ, Haddon WF. Formation of cyclic adducts of deoxyguanosine with the
aldehydes trans-4-hydroxy-2-hexenal and trans-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in vitro. Cancer Res. 1986;
46:56826. [PubMed: 3756915]
69. Basu AK, Wood ML, Niedernhofer LJ, Ramos LA, Essigmann JM. Mutagenic and genotoxic
effects of three vinyl chloride-induced DNA lesions: 1,N6-ethenoadenine, 3,N4-ethenocytosine,
and 4-amino-5-(imidazol-2-yl)imidazole. Biochemistry. 1993; 32:12793801. [PubMed: 8251500]
70. Nath RG, Randerath K, Li D, Chung FL. Endogenous production of DNA adducts. Regul Toxicol
Pharmacol. 1996; 23:228. [PubMed: 8628916]
71. Peakall DB, Lincer JL, Bloom SE. Embryonic mortality and chromosomal alterations caused by
aroclor 1254 in ring doves. Environ Health Perspect. 1972; 1:103. [PubMed: 17539068]
72. Odashima, S. The cooperative development in Japan of methods for screening chemicals for
carcinogenicity. In: Montesano, R., et al., editors. Screening Tests in Chemical Carcinogenesis
Publ No 12 Inter Agency Res Cancer. Lyon; France: 1976. p. 61
73. Sargent L, Roloff B, Meisner L. In vitro chromosome damage due to PCB interactions. Mutat Res.
1989; 224:7988. [PubMed: 2505070]
74. Sargent L, Dragan YP, Erickson C, Laufer CJ, Pitot HC. Study of the separate and combined
effects of the non-planar 2,5,2,5- and the planar 3,4,3,4-tetrachlorobiphenyl in liver and
lymphocytes in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 1991; 12:793800. [PubMed: 1827616]
75. Sargent LM, Sattler GL, Roloff B, Xu YH, Sattler CA, Meisner L, Pitot HC. Ploidy and specific
karyotypic changes during promotion with phenobarbital, 2,5,2,5-tetrachlorobiphenyl, and/or
3,4,34-tetrachlorobiphenyl in rat liver. Cancer Res. 1992; 52:95562. [PubMed: 1737357]
76. Jacobus JA, Flor S, Klingelhutz A, Robertson LW, Ludewig G. 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1,4Benzoquinone Increases the Frequency of Micronuclei and Shortens Telomeres. Environ Toxicol
Pharmacol. 2008; 25:267272. [PubMed: 18438462]
77. von Zglinicki T. Oxidative stress shortens telomeres. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002; 27:33944.
[PubMed: 12114022]
78. Bachor C, Bachor OA, Boukamp P. Telomerase is active in normal gastrointestinal mucosa and not
up-regulated in precancerous lesions. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1999; 125:45360. [PubMed:
10480337]
79. Harle-Bachor C, Boukamp P. Telomerase activity in the regenerative basal layer of the epidermis
inhuman skin and in immortal and carcinoma-derived skin keratinocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A. 1996; 93:647681. [PubMed: 8692840]
80. Stern MM, Bickenbach JR. Epidermal stem cells are resistant to cellular aging. Aging Cell. 2007;
6:43952. [PubMed: 17635170]
Page 12
Figure 1.
Average PCB concentration in Chicago air for the calendar year 2007. Data are depicted as a
weight percentage, and are taken from a study by Zhao et al, 2010 [20].
0.6
0.5
3,4-Cat
3,4-oQ
2,5-HQ
2,5-pQ
2.5
2.5
15
75
100
50
MN chromos. Loss1
7.5 (PP)
5 (SCE)
SCE or Polyploidy2
COMET @ 37C & 6C in HL-60 & Jurkat 0.1 (ROS ), 2.5 (GSH )
Xie [59]
Flor [58]
Zettner [57]
MN: micronucleus assay; SCE: sister chromatid exchange assay; PP: polyploidy; TG: thioquanine. These data are associated with the following published studies:
75
4-OH-
2-OH-
PCB3
MN chromos. Breaks1
3-OH-
Compound
Genotoxic profile of PCB3 metabolites, 2-hydroxy-PCB3 (2-OH-), 3-hydroxy-PCB3 (3-OH-), 4-hydroxy-PCB3 (4-OH-), 3,4-dihydroxy PCB3 (3,4-Cat),
3,4-ortho quinone (3,4-oQ), 2,5-hydroquinone (2,5-HQ), and 2,5 para quionone (2,5-pQ). Numbers are LOEL (M) for that endpoint.
Table 1
Robertson and Ludewig
Page 13
Gefahrst Reinhalt Luft. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 June 13.
Introduction
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent organic compounds of anthropogenic origin, which have
been produced on an industrial scale since 1929. They
were commonly used in the period 1950-1980. PCBs
have low or no flammability, good thermal stability,
low rates of evaporation and high electrical resistivity.
For all these reasons, they have been used in many industrial branches as heat transfer fluids, dielectric for
transformers and capacitors, additives in hydraulic fluids
in vacuum and turbine pumps, and plasticizers. They have
been incorporated into formulations for printing inks,
pesticides, paints, flame-retardants, waterproofing agents
and adhesives. PCBs enter the environment mainly during
accidents, not controlled or not properly controlled disposal of products containing the substances, chlorination
of drinking water and wastewater and as a by-product in
the chlorine bleaching of wood-pulp [1 - 8].
PCBs are stable compounds, resistant to decomposition by physical, chemical and biological factors. It
Corresponding author; e-mail: E.Niemirycz@imgw.gdynia.pl
is estimated that the half-life of PCBs in the environment is between 10 and 15 years [9, 10]. PCBs can
be removed from the natural environment by reaction
with active forms of metals and alkali, hydrogenation
as well as by photolysis, thermochemical reactions and
microbiological degradation [1]. The number and position of the chlorine atom in the molecule determine
PCBs rate of degradation. Mono and dichloro biphenyls are more easily decomposed than polychlorinated
biphenyls. The congeners containing the chlorine atoms
in one benzene ring are more easily degraded than the
ones with chlorine atoms in two rings. PCBs containing
a chlorine atom in orto position (in one or two benzene
rings) degrade with great difficulty [2].
PCBs are present in almost every element of the
environment because of their resistance to degradation, low rates of evaporation, lipophilicity and usage on a large scale for over 60 years (Table 1). High
concentrations of PCBs occur in cold and moderate
climates in the northern hemisphere. These substances
can be transported over large distances, and therefore
they are found in distant regions of Africa and Antarctica [1, 8, 11].
204
Rodziewicz M. et al.
Despite the relatively low concentrations of PCBs
in the natural environment, they have a negative influence on living organisms. PCBs undergo accumulation in consecutive links of the food chain. Plants,
crustaceans and fish easily absorb them. This results
in a decrease of photosynthesis, plant and fish growth
and reproductive capacity of aquatic organisms, and also
in increase of larvae mortality [13]. In the case of mammals, PCBs could cause pathologic changes in spleen and
skin. They also can damage immune, digestive, nervous
and reproductive systems, and promote the generation of
tumours [11, 14, 15, 16].
Within the International Odra Project (IOP) and
the individual project (No 6P04G02719) of the KBN
(Polish State Committee for Scientific Research), the
Department of Water Pollution Control, Maritime
Concentration
Air
0.1 20 ng/m3
Water
Sediment
Plankton
0.01 - 20 mg/kg
Invertebrates
0.01 - 10 mg/kg
Fish
0.01 - 25 mg/kg
Bird eggs
Human beeing
0.1 - 10 mg/kg
1.
52
2.
101
3.
118
0.0001
4.
153
5.
138
6.
180
7.
189
0.0001
Structural formula
205
System 2
GC 8000 Fisons
Column
Detector
ECD
Injection temperature
300 oC
280 oC
Carrier gas
flow rate
Make-up gas
Nitrogen
1l
1 l
Temperature program
Discussion of Results
The concentrations of 7 PCBs in sediment samples collected at different sites along the Odra River and its tributaries in May 1998 ranged from 1.3 g/kg (dry wt.) in the Odra
at Krosno Odrzaskie to 13.6 g/kg (dry wt.) in the Warta
near confluence. In November 1998, the sum of 7 PCBs
in all studied sediments varied from 1.3 to 28.0 g/kg (dry
wt.). The lowest concentration was measured in the Odra
for Widuchowa while the highest was in the Odra Braid.
Sample Preparation
Samples of surface sediments (0-5 cm) were collected
with a stainless steel bucket, transferred to glass vessels,
subsequently frozen, and stored at -20 C. After being defrosted, the samples were lyophilized, then sieved manually (sieve mesh 2 mm) and ground in a ball-grinder.
The internal standard (9-chloroanthracene) was added
to a 2 g sample of dry sediment and extracted with dichloromethane in Soxhlet apparatus for 15 h. The extract
was condensed by evaporation of the excess solvent in
evaporator under reduced pressure. After sulphur removal, achieved by adding copper powder, the extract was
purified on the micro-column filled with silica gel. A 9:
1 (v/v) mixture of hexane and dichloromethane was used
for elution. The eluate was condensed by evaporation of
the excess solvent in a stream of nitrogen and analyzed
chromatographically [17 - 18].
Chromatographic Analysis
The chromatographic analyses were performed on two
gas chromatographs. The chromatographic run conditions
in analysis of PCBs are shown in Table 3.
Fig. 1. Sediment sampling sites in the Odra River and its tributaries, 1998-2002 [17-18].
206
Rodziewicz M. et al.
Fig. 4. Average concentrations of PCBs on TOC basis in sediments from the Odra river and its tributaries, 1998 2002.
207
Summary
Acknowledgements
This work was done within the framework of International Odra Project (No 423KfK9702) coordinated by
Professor Arndt Knchel from Hamburg University and
the individual project of the Polish State Committee for
Scientific Research (No 6P04G02719).
The authors are obliged to Elbieta Heybowicz and Regina Taylor of the Institute Meteorology and Water Management for their help in preparing this publication.
References
1. FALANDYSZ J., Polichlorowane bifenyle (PCBs) w
rodowisku: chemia analiza, toksyczno, stenia i ocena
ryzyka, Fundacja Rozwoju Uniwersytetu Gdaskiego,
Gdask, 1999.
2. BRUDNOWSKA B., Trwae zwizki chloroorganiczne pochodzenia antropogenicznego w powietrzu atmosferycznym,
wodzie wilanej, glebach i osadach dennych w Polsce, praca
doktorska wykonana na Uniwersytecie Gdaskim, Gdask,
2000.
3. BOGUTYN W., Problemy likwidacji PCBs w polskiej gospodarce, Seminarium Implementacje Konwencji Sztokholmskiej, Warszawa, 21-22 marca 2002.
4. STRANDBERG B., BANDH C., BAVEL B., BERGQVIST
P. A., BROMAN D., ISHAG R., NAF C., RAPPE C., Organochlorine compounds in the Gulf of Bothnia: sediment
and bentic species, Chemosphere, 40, 1205, 2000.
5. SCHNEIDER A. R., STAPLETON H. M., CORNWELL J.,
BAKER J. E., Recent declines in PAH, PCB and toxaphene
levels in the Northern Great Lakes as determined from high
resolution sediment cores, Environmental Science and Technology, 35 (19), 3809, 2001.
6. EGANHOUSE R. P., PONTOLILLO J., Depositional history of organic contaminants on the Paolos Verdes Shelf,
California, Marine Chemistry, 70, 317, 2000.
7. EGANHOUSE R. P., PONTOLILLO J., LEIKER T. J.,
Diagenetic fate of organic contaminants on the Palos Verdes
Shelf, California, 70, 289, 2000.
8. ISOSAARI P., KANKAANPAA H., MATTILA J., KIVIRANTA H., VERTA M., SALO S., VARTIAINEN T.,
Spatial distribution and temporal accumulation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p.-dioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls in
the Gulf of Finland, Environmental Science and Technology, 36 (12), 2560, 2002.
9. DOJLIDO J., Chemia wd powierzchniowych, Wydawnictwo Ekonomia i rodowisko, Biaystok, 1995.
10. SAPOTA G., Chlorinated hydrocarbons in sediments from
the Vistula Lagoon, Oceanological Studies, 2-3, 61, 1997.
11. JONKER M. T.O., KOEIMANS A. A., Sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls
to soot and soot-like materials in the aqueous environment:
mechanistic considerations, Environmental Science and
Technology, 36 (17), 3725, 2002.
12. ALLOWAY B. J., AYRES D. C., Chemiczne podstawy zanieczyszczenia rodowiska, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,
Warszawa, 1999.
13. SAPOTA G. Bioakumulacja wglowodorw chlorowanych
w sieci troficznej Zatoki Gdaskiej, rozprawa doktorska,
IMGW, UG, Gdynia, 2000.
14. WJTOWICZ A. K, GREGORASZCZUK E. , Polichlorowane bifenyle jako czynniki zaburzajce procesy
endokrynne w jajniku, Dioksyny w przemyle i rodowisku,
Krakw, 21-22 czerwca 2001.
15. PETROVI M., ELJARRAT E., LPEZ DE ALDA M.
J., BARCEL D., Analysis and environmental levels of
endocrine-disrupting compounds in freshwater sediments,
Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 20 (11), 637, 2001.
16. GUSZCZYSKI P., Obecno trwaych zanieczyszcze
organicznych w pokarmie kobiecym w Polsce, Seminarium
208
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Rodziewicz M. et al.
IMGW, Warszawa, 2000.
22. GALER K., ZYGMUNT B., WOLSKA L., NAMIENIK
J., Evaluation of Pollution Degree of the Odra River Basin
with Organic Compounds after the 97 Summer Flood. Part
III. Determination of Pollution of Post Flood Sediments
with Polichlorinated Biphenyls and Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons, Chemia Analityczna, 45 (2), 297, Warszawa,
2000.
23. KONAT J., KOWALEWSKA G., Polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) in sediments of the southern Baltic Sea - trend and
fate, The Science of the Total Environment, 280, 1, 2001.
24. DANNENBERGER D., LERZ A., Occurence and transport
of organic micro-contaminants in sediments of the Odra river estuarine system, Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica,
27 (5), 303, 1999.
25. KACZMARCZYK A., SOSNOWSKA M., NIEMIRYCZ
E., Charakterystyka jakoci wd i osadw dorzecza Odry
na podstawie wynikw Midzynarodowego Projektu Odra,
Warunki rodowiskowe polskiej strefy poudniowego
Batyku w 2000 roku, Materiay Oddziau Morskiego
IMGW, 2001.
26. NIEMIRYCZ E., SOSNOWSKA M., KACZMARCZYK
A., SZAFRANEK J., rda toksycznych zanieczyszcze
organicznych w wodach i osadach dorzecza Odry,
W: Materiay konferencji. z VI Midzynarodowej Konferencji Naukowo-Technicznej, pt. Problemy oczyszczania
ciekw i ochrony wd w dorzeczu Odry, Karpacz, pp.
193-201, 14-17 maja 2000, Wrocaw, 2001.