ABSTRAK

J I Bari, Agata. 2020. Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Laboratorium

Biologi Tesis, Program Studi Pendidikan Sains, Pascasarjana Universitas Surabaya.
Pembimbing : (I) Prof. Dr. H. Muslimin Ibrahim, M.Pd. dan (II) Dr. Yuliani, M.Si.

Kata Kunci : Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja, Laboratorium Biologi

Penelitian bertujuan untuk menghasilkan instrument penilaian kinerja laboratorium

biologi yang valid, reliabel dan praktis. Adapun parameter penelitian ini terdiri atas
validitas, reliabilitas dan kepraktisan. Aspek kevaliditas ditinjau oleh dari hasil
penilaian instrument penilaian kinerja laboratorium biologi oleh para validator, skor
yang diperoleh kemudian di analisis dengan menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif
kuantitatif. Aspek reliabilitas ditinjau dari reliabilitas validasi dan reliabilitas
pengamat yang kemudian dianalisis menggunakan rumus Percentage of Agreement.
Aspek kepraktisan ditinjau dari keterlaksanaan mengembangkan instrument penilaian
kinerja laboratorium biologi dan hasil angket guru). Hasil analisis data menunjukan
validitas instrumen penilaian kinerja menggunakan mikroskop dan indikator univesal
dikategorikan sangat valid, sedangkan penilaian kinerja membuat respirometer
sederhana, membuat spirometer sederhana, mendemonstrasikan gerakan pernafasan
dada dan pernafasan perut dikategorikan valid. Reliabilitas validasi (R ≥ 75%) dan
reliabiltas Instrumen (R ≥ 75%) sehingga dikategorikan reliabel. Kepraktisan
instrumen penilaian kinerja menggunakan mikroskop dan indikator universal,
membuat alat respirometer sederhana dan spirometer sederhana, serta
mendemonstrasikan gerakan pernafasan dada dan pernafasan perut dilihat dari
keterlaksanaannya berturut-turut adalah 95.37% (sangat praktis), 93,18 % (sangat
praktis), 97,22 % (sangat praktis), 99,26 % (sangat praktis), 91,07 % (sangat praktis),
82,18% (sangat praktis). Berdasarkan hasil angket guru instrumen penilaian kinerja
Kepraktisan instrumen penilaian kinerja menggunakan mikroskop dan indikator
universal, membuat alat respirometer sederhana, mendemonstrasikan gerakan
pernafasan dada dan pernafasan perut dikategorikan sangat praktis, dan instrumen
penilaian kinerja membuat spirometer sederhana diategorikan praktis.

vi
 ABSTRACT

J I Bari, Agata. 2020., Development of Biology Thesis Laboratory Performance

Assessment Instrument, Science Education Study Program, Graduate of Surabaya
State Universiry. Counselor : (I) Prof. Dr. H. Muslimin Ibrahim, M.Pd. dan (II) Dr.
Yuliani, M.Si.

Keywords : Performance Appraisal Instrument, Biology Laboratory

This study aims to produce a valid, reliable and practical biology laboratory
performance assessment instrument. The validity aspect was reviewed by the results
of the assessment of the biological laboratory performance assessment instrument by
the validators, the scores obtained were then analyzed using quantitative descriptive
analysis methods. The reliability aspect is evaluated from the validation and
reliability of the observer which is then analyzed using the Percentage of Agreement
formula. The practicality aspect in terms of the feasibility of developing a biology
laboratory performance appraisal instrument and the results of the teacher
questionnaire were calculated using the practicality formula adopted from Widoyoko
(2013). The results of the data analysis show the validity of performance assessment
instruments using a microscope and universal indicators is categorized as very valid,
while the performance appraisal makes a simple respirometer, makes a simple
spirometer, demonstrates chest breathing and abdominal breathing movements
categorized valid. The validation reliability (R ≥ 75%) and the reliability of the
Instrument (R ≥ 75%) so that it is categorized as reliable. The practicality of
performance appraisal instruments using a microscope and universal indicators,
making a simple respirometer and a simple spirometer, as well as demonstrating chest
and abdominal breathing movements seen in succession are 95.37% (very practical),
93.18% (very practical), 97 , 22% (very practical), 99.26% (very practical), 91.07%
(very practical), 82.18% (very practical). Whereas based on the results of the
teacher's questionnaire performance appraisal instrument Practical performance
appraisal instruments using microscopes and universal indicators, making simple
respirometer devices, demonstrating chest breathing and abdominal breathing
movements are categorized very practical, while performance assessment instruments
making simple spirometers are categorized as practical.

vii