Status Gizi Anak Balita PDF
Status Gizi Anak Balita PDF
KUESIONER
FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN STATUS GIZI ANAK BALITA
DI DESA KOLAM KECAMATAN PERCUT SEI TUAN
KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG TAHUN 2010
Alamat Responden :
I. Identitas Responden
1. Nama :
2. Umur :
3. Pekerjaan :
a. Pegawai Negeri Sipil
b. Pegawai Swasta
c. Wiraswasta
d. Ibu Rumah Tangga
4. Pendidikan :
a. Tidak Sekolah/tidak tamat SD
b. Tamat SD
c. Tamat SLTP
d. Tamat SLTA
e. Tamat Akademi
f. Sarjana
5. Jumlah anak :
II. Identitas Balita
1. Nama :
2. Umur :
3. Berat Badan Lahir :
4. Berat Badan sekarang :
5. Jenis kelamin :
Status Imunisasi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak Lengkap 18 17.1 17.1 17.1
Valid Lengkap 87 82.9 82.9 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0
Pendidikan ibu
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Pendidikan Rendah 80 76.2 76.2 76.2
Valid Pendidikan Tinggi 25 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0
Pekerjaan ibu
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Bekerja 8 7.6 7.6 7.6
Valid Tidak Bekerja 97 92.4 92.4 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0
ISPA
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid ISPA 69 65.7 65.7 65.7
Tidak ISPA 36 34.3 34.3 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0
Diare
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Diare 47 44.8 44.8 44.8
Valid Tidak Diare 58 55.2 55.2 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0
tipe jamban
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Cemplung 10 9.5 9.5 9.5
Valid Jamban leher angsa 95 90.5 90.5 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0
keadaan jamban
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak terwat sama sekali 8 7.6 7.6 7.6
Jarang dibersihkan 26 24.8 24.8 32.4
Valid
Terawat dan bersih 71 67.6 67.6 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0
Crosstabs
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .081a 1 .776
Continuity Correctionb .008 1 .930
Likelihood Ratio .081 1 .776
Fisher's Exact Test .845 .465
Linear-by-Linear Association .080 1 .777
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.28.
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Berat Badan
17.569 4.812 64.156
Lahir (BBLR / Normal)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
2.912 2.028 4.180
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.166 .057 .485
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.348a 1 .125
b
Continuity Correction 1.618 1 .203
Likelihood Ratio 2.341 1 .126
Fisher's Exact Test .192 .102
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.326 1 .127
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Status pemberian ASI Tidak Count 29 36 65
Eksklusif
Expected Count 29.1 35.9 65.0
% within Status pemberian
44.6% 55.4% 100.0%
ASI Eksklusif
% within Status Gizi Anak 61.7% 62.1% 61.9%
% of Total 27.6% 34.3% 61.9%
Ya Count 18 22 40
Expected Count 17.9 22.1 40.0
% within Status pemberian
45.0% 55.0% 100.0%
ASI Eksklusif
% within Status Gizi Anak 38.3% 37.9% 38.1%
% of Total 17.1% 21.0% 38.1%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Status pemberian
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
ASI Eksklusif
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Status
pemberian ASI Eksklusif .985 .446 2.174
(Tidak / Ya)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.991 .641 1.534
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.007 .706 1.436
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Status pemberian kolostrum Tidak Count 38 17 55
Expected Count 24.6 30.4 55.0
% within Status pemberian
69.1% 30.9% 100.0%
kolostrum
% within Status Gizi Anak 80.9% 29.3% 52.4%
% of Total 36.2% 16.2% 52.4%
Ya Count 9 41 50
Expected Count 22.4 27.6 50.0
% within Status pemberian
18.0% 82.0% 100.0%
kolostrum
% within Status Gizi Anak 19.1% 70.7% 47.6%
% of Total 8.6% 39.0% 47.6%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Status pemberian
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
kolostrum
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 27.649a 1 .000
b
Continuity Correction 25.622 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 29.246 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 27.386 1 .000
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.38.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Pendidikan ibu Pendidikan Rendah Count 39 41 80
Expected Count 35.8 44.2 80.0
% within Pendidikan ibu 48.8% 51.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 83.0% 70.7% 76.2%
% of Total 37.1% 39.0% 76.2%
Pendidikan Tinggi Count 8 17 25
Expected Count 11.2 13.8 25.0
% within Pendidikan ibu 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 17.0% 29.3% 23.8%
% of Total 7.6% 16.2% 23.8%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Pendidikan ibu 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pendidikan
ibu (Pendidikan Rendah / 2.021 .783 5.215
Pendidikan Tinggi)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.523 .824 2.815
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.754 .535 1.063
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu Kurang Count 33 38 71
Expected Count 31.8 39.2 71.0
% within Tingkat
46.5% 53.5% 100.0%
Pengetahuan ibu
% within Status Gizi Anak 70.2% 65.5% 67.6%
% of Total 31.4% 36.2% 67.6%
Baik Count 14 20 34
Expected Count 15.2 18.8 34.0
% within Tingkat
41.2% 58.8% 100.0%
Pengetahuan ibu
% within Status Gizi Anak 29.8% 34.5% 32.4%
% of Total 13.3% 19.0% 32.4%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Tingkat
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Pengetahuan ibu
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .261a 1 .609
b
Continuity Correction .091 1 .763
Likelihood Ratio .262 1 .609
Fisher's Exact Test .678 .383
Linear-by-Linear Association .259 1 .611
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.22.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Pekerjaan ibu Bekerja Count 4 4 8
Expected Count 3.6 4.4 8.0
% within Pekerjaan ibu 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 8.5% 6.9% 7.6%
% of Total 3.8% 3.8% 7.6%
Tidak Bekerja Count 43 54 97
Expected Count 43.4 53.6 97.0
% within Pekerjaan ibu 44.3% 55.7% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 91.5% 93.1% 92.4%
% of Total 41.0% 51.4% 92.4%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Pekerjaan ibu 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan ibu
1.256 .297 5.314
(Bekerja / Tidak Bekerja)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.128 .545 2.336
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.898 .439 1.837
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Jumlah anak dalam keluarga >=3 orang Count 14 18 32
Expected Count 14.3 17.7 32.0
% within Jumlah anak dalam
43.8% 56.2% 100.0%
keluarga
% within Status Gizi Anak 29.8% 31.0% 30.5%
% of Total 13.3% 17.1% 30.5%
1-2 orang Count 33 40 73
Expected Count 32.7 40.3 73.0
% within Jumlah anak dalam
45.2% 54.8% 100.0%
keluarga
% within Status Gizi Anak 70.2% 69.0% 69.5%
% of Total 31.4% 38.1% 69.5%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Jumlah anak dalam
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
keluarga
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square a
.019 1 .890
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .019 1 .890
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .531
Linear-by-Linear Association .019 1 .891
N of Valid Casesb 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.32.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
ISPA ISPA Count 36 33 69
Expected Count 30.9 38.1 69.0
% within ISPA 52.2% 47.8% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 56.9% 65.7%
% of Total 34.3% 31.4% 65.7%
Tidak ISPA Count 11 25 36
Expected Count 16.1 19.9 36.0
% within ISPA 30.6% 69.4% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 43.1% 34.3%
% of Total 10.5% 23.8% 34.3%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within ISPA 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for ISPA (ISPA /
2.479 1.058 5.813
Tidak ISPA)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.708 .993 2.935
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.689 .496 .956
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.537a 1 .019
Continuity Correctionb 4.647 1 .031
Likelihood Ratio 5.571 1 .018
Fisher's Exact Test .029 .015
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.484 1 .019
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.04.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Kesehatan lingkungan Tidak baik Count 11 6 17
Expected Count 7.6 9.4 17.0
% within Kesehatan
64.7% 35.3% 100.0%
lingkungan
% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 10.3% 16.2%
% of Total 10.5% 5.7% 16.2%
Baik Count 36 52 88
Expected Count 39.4 48.6 88.0
% within Kesehatan
40.9% 59.1% 100.0%
lingkungan
% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 89.7% 83.8%
% of Total 34.3% 49.5% 83.8%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Kesehatan
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
lingkungan
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kesehatan
lingkungan (Tidak baik / 2.648 .898 7.811
Baik)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.582 1.027 2.435
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.597 .307 1.163
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105
Logistic Regression
Predicted
Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables BBLk 26.690 1 .000
Imunlkap 2.348 1 .125
KoLs 27.649 1 .000
didikk 2.161 1 .142
ISPA 4.472 1 .034
Diare 5.537 1 .019
Lingk 3.263 1 .071
Overall Statistics 47.617 7 .000
Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 86.551a .424 .567
b
6 92.157 .392 .525
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
b. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
Status Gizi Anak = Gizi Kurang Status Gizi Anak = Gizi Baik
Classification Tablea
Predicted
Score df Sig.
a
Step 6 Variables didikk 1.859 1 .173
ISPA .491 1 .483
Diare 1.680 1 .195
Lingk 1.991 1 .158
Overall Statistics 5.325 4 .256
a. Variable(s) removed on step 5: Lingk.
Step Summarya,b
Improvement Model
Correct Class
Step Chi-square df Sig. Chi-square df Sig. % Variable
2 -.369 1 .544 57.486 6 .000 81.9% OUT: ISPA
3 -1.526 1 .217 55.961 5 .000 81.9% OUT: didikk
4 -1.698 1 .192 54.262 4 .000 79.0% OUT: Diare
5 -2.013 1 .156 52.250 3 .000 78.1% OUT: Lingk
a. No more variables can be deleted from or added to the current model.
b. End block: 1