ABSTRAK
Pendahuluan: kebijakan International merekomendasikan Interprofesional Pendidikan (IPE) untuk meningkatkan praktek
interprofessional Dalam upaya untuk meningkatkan praktek perawat profesional, IPE adalah strategi membentuk perilaku
profesional perawat dalam kerja tim dan kolaborasi antara profesional kesehatan lainnya, terutama dokter dalam perawatan
kritis. Tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model IPE kerja tim dan kolaborasi dari sikap mahasiswa keperawatan di unit
perawatan intensif Rumah Sakit. Metode: Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan Rancangan kuasi-eksperimental. Jumlah 30
subyek (15 intervensi dan 15 kelompok kontrol) oleh random sampling. intervensi terdiri dari: 1) pretest 2) pemberian
modul pendidikan interprofessional materi pada mata pelajaran keperawatan kritis selama 2 minggu, 2) posttest. tes t
berpasangan digunakan untuk menentukan dampak dari Pendidikan interprofessional. Kemerdekaan t-test digunakan
untuk mengetahui pengaruh perbedaan Pendidikan interprofessional. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah Sikap terhadap
Kesehatan interprofessional Tim Timbangan untuk mengukur sikap kerja tim dan Interprofesional Kolaborasi Timbangan
untuk mengukur sikap kolaborasi. Hasil: Ada tarif perbedaan kerja tim dan sikap kolaborasi perawat sebelum dan sesudah
pada kelompok intervensi. Ada werenot tarif perbedaan kerja tim dan sikap kolaborasi perawat sebelum dan sesudah pada
kelompok kontrol. Ada nilai perbedaan sikap kerja tim dan kolaborasi antara intervensi dan kelompok kontrol. Diskusi:
Memberikan modul IPE untuk perawat umumnya dianggap menjadi strategi penting untuk meningkatkan kerja tim dan
sikap kolaborasi pada siswa perawat di unit perawatan intensif rumah sakit.
ABSTRACT
Introducction: International policy recommends Interprofesional Education (IPE) to improve the practice of
interprofessional In an effort to improve the practice of professional nurses, the IPE is the strategy of forming professional
conduct of nurses in team work and collaboration between other health professionals, especially doctors in critical care.
Objective to identify the effect of IPE model of team work and collaboration of the attitudes of nursing students in an
intensive care unit of Hospital. Methods: This study was conducted with The quasi-experimental design. The number of
30 subjects (15 intervention and 15 control group) by random sampling. The intervention consisted of: 1) pretest 2) the
provision of material interprofessional education modules on subjects of critical nursing for 2 weeks, 2) posttest. Paired
t tests were used to determine the effects of interprofessional Education. Independence t-test were used to determine the
difference effect of interprofessional Education. The instrument used was The Attitudes towards interprofessional Health
Care Teams Scales to measure the attitude of teamwork and Interprofesional Collaboration Scales to measure the attitude
of collaboration. Results: There were differences rates of team work and collaboration attitudes of nurses before and after
on intervention group. There werenot differences rates of team work and collaboration attitudes of nurses before and after
on control group. There were differences scores of the attitude of team work and collaboration between the intervention
and control groups. Discussion: Giving IPE modules for nurses are commonly regarded to be an essential strategy for
improving team work and collaboration attitudes on nurses student at intensive care unit of hospital.
115
Jurnal INJEC Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember 2016: 115–121
116
Effect Interprofessional Education Model on Team Work (Eny Kusmiran, dkk.)
nursing. This interprofessional education of lectures amd students for the role play,
(IPE) is one of the study in the development teamwork practise, and work performance as
of nursing study program curriculum. a team. The domain of IPE implementation
consist of: teamwork, role models and
Framework Interprofessional Education
responsibility, communication, learning and
lectures amd IPE students
concept isfor
a process
the role in preparing
play, Australian Governmant
reflection, Officerand
interconnection foridentification
Learning
teamwork practise, and
collaboration work performance
practise that supportashealth
a and of
Teaching
patients(2014)
need, itand
wasethics.
explained that IPE- in
Meanwhile,
team. The domain
lectures
services amd of improve
IPE for
so it students
can implementation
the role
health play,
outcomes. based education
Australian process
Governmant consist
Officer for
the Curriculum Renewal for Interprofessional of
Learning
consist of:
teamwork teamwork,
practise, and role
work models
performance
Collaboration practise occurs in service and as a interprofessional learningit was
and Teaching (2014) (IPL) activitythat
explained andIPE-
Education in Health published by The
responsibility,
team. The communication,
domain of IPE learning and
implementation
environment that involve several people interprofessional
based practiceprocess
education (IPP). consist
In this of
reflection, Australian Governmant Officer for Learning
consistinterconnection
of: teamwork, and identification
role models of and process,
interprofessional learning (IPL) activityits and
the role of tutor also determines
with different profession background. IPE and so
Teaching (2014) it was (IPP).
explained
patients need, and ethics. Meanwhile,
responsibility, communication, learning in the and success, tutor should
interprofessional understand
practice In that
the purpose this
implementation phase consist of: preparation IPE-based education
Curriculum
reflection,Renewal for Interprofessional
interconnection and identification of of learning
process,(Sharpe, of tutor also determinesofits
the role2009). process consist
of IPE-based
Education
patients in
need,Health
andcurriculum,
published
ethics. identification
by The
Meanwhile, in the interprofessional
success, learning
so tutor should (IPL) activity
understand and
the purpose
Curriculum Renewal for Interprofessional of learning (Sharpe, 2009).
Education in Health published by The
Inform
Theorising Inform
Practising Embodying
theory
Make sense of
‘Making sense’ of
experience
Theorising Practising Embodying
theory
Make sense of
‘Making sense’ of
experience
interprofessional practice (IPP). In this process, Some research suggested that IPE-
the role of tutor also determines its success, based education curriculum encouraged to
so tutor should understand the purpose of the establishment of attitude and readiness of
learning (Sharpe, 2009). students to work with a team which consist of
several health professioncs, such as Mandy
Team Work Attitude
et al. (2004), Regmi (2010), and Wilhelmson
Attitude, according to Hodges (2012) (2011). Based on the social identity theory,
had more to do with feelings, and individual students who have a positif look to their
reactions
support each to incidents
other, so in it
thecansurrounding.
encourage a group
and and other groups
other groups showed
showed a positive
a positive
Attitude is
relationship also a disposition
that can to react positivelythe
improve interprofessional
interprofessionallearning
learningresult too.too.
result The The
(favorably)
communication; or negatively feedbackstothat
(unfavorably)
to give positive implication is that the IPE process encourage a
implication is that the IPE process encourage
certain objects.
can smooth the process or outcomes; to receive positiveattitude
a positive attitudeofofstudents
studentsininthe
thereadiness
readiness for
suggestion
Teamwork fromis an others
act that canto beimprove
conductedself forteamwork.
teamwork.
bycapability;
a group as to a teamconduct group
to achieve goalsdecision
(Boller,for
team’s problem solving, to give ideas and Collaboration Attitude
Collaboration Attitude
2005). The activities in this collaboration
mutual trust.
consist of: mutual help and sharing of Collaboration
Collaboration is isa complex
a complex and and
The attitude of teamwork is the
expertise, sharing of information to support multidimensional
multidimensional activity, involving
activity, nurses,
involving nurses,
willingness of individuals to conduct team
each doctors,andand other profession whowhoworkwork
workother,
and soactive
it can communication
encourage a relationshipwithin the doctors, other profession
that canActive
improve togetherto to provide services to individual
team. hasthe communication;
a meaning to give
to give suggestion together provide services to individual
positive feedbacks that can smooth
and encourage each other to achieve team’s the process patients, families, and communities (Cox,(Cox,
patients, families, and communities
2010). Futhermore, according to Curran
orgoals.
outcomes; to receive suggestion from others 2010). Futhermore, according to Curran (2007),
(2007), collaboration in nursing is a process
to improveThe self main components
capability; to conduct of group
attitude collaboration in nursing is a process that focues
that focues on patients with two or more
formation according to (Notoadmodjo
decision for team’s problem solving, to give 2011) on interactions
patients withof two or moretointeractions
professions of
share knowledge,
are: and
ideas religion
mutual or trust.
belief, idea, and concept of professions to share knowledge, skills, and
skills, and decision making in patient care.
attitude;
The attitude life
emotional of orteamwork
evaluation is of people
the decision making in patient
There are severalcare.
factors that able to
to an object; as well as tendency to act.
willingness of individuals to conduct team Therethe
increase arepractise
severaloffactors that ablesuch
collaboration, to as:
Some research suggested that IPE-
work attitudes, knowledge, skills, and organizational
basedand active communication
education curriculum encouraged within theto the increase the practise of collaboration, such as:
team. factors.knowledge,
An effective communication is the key
establishment of attitude and suggestion
Active has a meaning to give readiness of attitudes, skills, and organizational
and encourage
students to work each other
with to achieve
a team team’s of
which consist factors. An effective communication is2003,
of collaboration success (Laming, the in
goals.
several health professioncs, such as Mandy et key of collaboration success (Laming, 2003,inter
Cox, 2010), in addition, an effective
professional collaboration can improve
The main
al. (2004), Regmi components
(2010), and of Wilhelmson
attitude in Cox, 2010), in addition, an effective inter
teamwork, working satisfaction, and reduce
(2011). Based
formation accordingon the social identity2011)
to (Notoadmodjo theory, professional collaboration can improve
patients’ level of pain.
are: religion or belief, idea, and concept group
students who have a positif look to their of teamwork, working satisfaction, and reduce
attitude; emotional life or evaluation of people patients’ level of pain.
to an object; as well as tendency to act.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Nurse student
Education Learning
Outcomes
Knowledge
Interprofessional
Competency Attitude
Education
Skills
Interprofessional
Learning
Interprofessional
Practice
METHOD RESULTS
This research was a quantitative The results study were conducted through
research with an experimental quasi design two phases. The first phase was the development
with pre-test and post-test to identify the of critical nursing module with IPE approach.
effect of Interprofessional Education model The development and preparation of module
to the team work and collaboration attitude of was based on the identification of IPE material
nursing students in the intensive care unit of needs and assessment to lectures and perceivers
hospital. as well as literature study such as a referral from
The population of this research was all Interprofesional Working in Acut Care (IWAC) by
nursing students in STIKES Rajawali at the Holland (2003) in March–April 2016. The second
final grade as many as 70 people. The sample phase was the implementation of critical nursing
was divided into two groups: 15 people of module material provision with IPE approach in
intervented group and 15 people of control June 2016.
group. A drop out criteria was the absence The provision of IPE module about critical
student or sick during the practical period of nursing with experimental quasi approach was
critical nursing subject. conducted to 15 nursing students as control and 15
Team work attitude instrument used nursing students as treatment. The implementation
The Attitudes towards Interprofessional Health of critical nursing module material provision
Care Teams Scale and collaboration attitude was conducted for two weeks in June 2016. The
used Interprofessional Collaboration Scale. assessment was conducted a week before the
The scale of questions used Likert scale (1 = implementation of IPE module provision about
strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = doubt, 4 = critical nursing module to intervented group and
agree, 5 = strongly agree). standard material to control group. The evaluation
was conducted after the implementation of
Table 3 difference changes of mean scores of team work and collaboration attitude between
intervention and control group
Mean
No Variables Intervention Control CI95% p
Difference
1 Team work attitude
Mean 7,0 4,4 2,6 2,3–7,5 0,285
Standard Deviation 4,3 8,1
2 Collaboration attitude
Mean 4,1 5,7 1,6 4,9–8,2 0,614
Standard Deviation 4,2 11,3
*independence t-test
119
Jurnal INJEC Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember 2016: 115–121
treatment once nursing students completed their research, IPE module consist of the following
nursing profession practice for six weeks. materials: 1) the concept of material and
The test results table 1 showed that there skills of partnership among nurses and other
were significant differences mean teamwork health workers; 2) interprofession team
attitude the student nurses before and after work, this material consist of integrated and
between intervention and control groups interdiscipline learning, which conducted
p < 0.05. through study, seminars, and working in a
There is on table 2 showe a significant group, 3) collaboration among nurses and
difference in the mean attitude of collaboration doctors; 4) communication in nursing and 5)
student nurses before and after the intervention implementation of the IPE in nursing clinical
group. There are differences between the mean practise.
attitude of the average attitude of collaboration
student nurses before and after in the control
CONCLUTION AND
group but indicated no significant difference
RECOMMENDATION
p > 0.05.
The results of the table 3 shows that the Conclusion
average change in attitude of team work and In this study, it can be concluded
collaboration among student nurses before and that there was a significant change of team
after the intervention and control groups was work and collaboration attitude of nursing
not significant p > 0.05. students before and after the provision of IPE
module. There was no significant difference
DISCUSSION of collaboration attitude of nursing students
before and after the treatment in control group.
In this research, it can be identified that The change of team work attitude in nursing
the assessment of team work attitude to nursing students before and after the IPE module
students in the intervented group increased treatment in intervented group was higher
towards team work attitude. The change of than control group. There was no significant
team work attitude showed a good quality change of collaboration attitude in intervented
as many as > 80, referred to the assessment group and control group.
of attitude perception. The change of team
work attitude was also identified in the control Recommendation
group however its change was in sufficient IPE module in critical nursing can
limit (75–80). These results showed that IPE be implemented to improve the capability
material provision in critical nursing improved of nursing students for teamwork and
the team work attitude of nursing students. collaboration attitude during their practice in
The collaboration attitude in intervented intensive care unit, The assessment of team
group showed a significant change while the work and collaboration attitude of nursing
change of collaboration attitude in control students requires a minimal performance
group was not significant. However, the standard > 80. If the assessment has not
change of collaboration attitude has not in a reached the standard, a provision of material
good quality < 80. and reassessment is required.
The model of pre-profession briefing
to achieve critical nursing learning outcomes
with interprofessional education approach BIBLIOGRAPHY
in nursing profession program has not been Azwar, S. 2000. Sikap Manusia: Teori dan
widely implemented in nursing institutions. Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
The provision of IPE module in this research Pelajar.
was focused on the capability of nursing Barr, H. 2001. Interprofessional Education:
students to cooperate and collaborate during Today, yesterday, and tomorrow
their practice in intensive care unit. In this Learning and theaching Support
120
Effect Interprofessional Education Model on Team Work (Eny Kusmiran, dkk.)
121