Anda di halaman 1dari 32

Lampiran 1

KUESIONER
FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN STATUS GIZI ANAK BALITA
DI DESA KOLAM KECAMATAN PERCUT SEI TUAN
KABUPATEN DELI SERDANG TAHUN 2010

Alamat Responden :

I. Identitas Responden

1. Nama :
2. Umur :
3. Pekerjaan :
a. Pegawai Negeri Sipil
b. Pegawai Swasta
c. Wiraswasta
d. Ibu Rumah Tangga

4. Pendidikan :
a. Tidak Sekolah/tidak tamat SD
b. Tamat SD
c. Tamat SLTP
d. Tamat SLTA
e. Tamat Akademi
f. Sarjana
5. Jumlah anak :
II. Identitas Balita
1. Nama :
2. Umur :
3. Berat Badan Lahir :
4. Berat Badan sekarang :
5. Jenis kelamin :

Universitas Sumatera Utara


III. Status Imunisasi
Apakah anak balita anda telah mendapatkan imunisasi di bawah ini:
a. BCG 1. Ya 2. Tidak
b. Polio 1 1. Ya 2. Tidak
c. Polio 2 1. Ya 2. Tidak
d. Polio 3 1. Ya 2. Tidak
e. Polio 4 1. Ya 2. Tidak
f. DPT 1 1. Ya 2. Tidak
g. DPT 2 1. Ya 2. Tidak
h. DPT 3 1. Ya 2. Tidak
i. Campak 1. Ya 2. Tidak
j. Hepatitis B1 1. Ya 2. Tidak
k. Hepatitis B2 1. Ya 2. Tidak
l. Hepatitis B3 1. Ya 2. Tidak

IV. Status ASI Ekslusif


Apakah anak balita anda telah diberikan ASI Eksklusif (ASI saja sebagai
makanan hingga balita berumur 6 bulan)?
1. Tidak
2. Ya
V. Pada saat anak anda lahir apakah anda memberikan ASI yang pertama kali keluar
yang berwarna kuning (kolostrum)?
1. Tidak
2. Ya
VI. Pengetahuan Ibu
1. Apakah makanan/minuman terbaik untuk bayi?
a. Tidak tahu b. Susu botol c. ASI
2. Kapan pertama kali sebaiknya anak ibu diberikan makanan tambahan?
a. Tidak tahu b. <6 bulan c. >6 bulan
3. Apakah yang dimaksud dengan makanan 4 sehat 5 sempurna?
a. Tidak tahu
b. Makanan bergizi
c. Makanan yang terdiri dari nasi, lauk, sayur, buah dan susu.
4. Makanan apa saja yang mengandung zat tenaga (karbohidrat)

Universitas Sumatera Utara


a. Tidak tahu b. Kurang tahu (1 item) c. Tahu (lebih dari 1 item)
Item: nasi, jagung, kentang, ubi, roti
5. Makanan apa saja yang mengandung zat pembangun (protein)
a. Tidak tahu b. Kurang tahu (1 item) c. Tahu (lebih dari 1
item)
Item:telur,daging,ayam,ikan
6. Apakah manfaat imunisasi?
a. Tidak tahu
b. Menambah berat badan
c. Memberi kekebalan terhadap penyakit
7. Umur berapakah sebaiknya imunisasi dasar lengkap diberikan kepada bayi?
a. Tidak tahu b. > 1 tahun c. < 1 tahun
8. Apakah yang dimaksud dengan ASI Eksklusif?
a. Tidak tahu
b. Memberikan ASI
c. Memberikan ASI sampai umur anak 6 bulan.

VII. Riwayat Penyakit Infeksi


1. Diare
Apakah dalam satu bulan terakhir anak balita anda pernah menderita diare?
a. Ya
b. Tidak
2. ISPA
Apakah dalam satu bulan terakhir anak balita anda pernah menderita penyakit
ISPA (batuk, pilek, diserta atau tanpa demam)?
a. Ya
b. Tidak

Universitas Sumatera Utara


VIII. Faktor Lingkungan
1. Sumber air minum keluarga
a. Sumur gali
b. PAM/Sumur bor
c. Air kemasan
2. Kebiasaan minum keluarga
a. Tidak dimasak
b. Kadang-kadang dimasak
c. Dimasak sampai mendidih
3. Kondisi air minum
a. Keruh, berasa dan berbau
b. Bening, tidak berasa dan berbau
c. Bening, tidak berasa dan tidak berbau
4. Tipe jamban
a. Cemplung
b. Jamban leher angsa
c. Closet
5. Keadaan jamban
a. Tidak terawat sama sekali
b. Jarang dibersihkan
c. Terawat dan bersih
6. Jenis tempat pembuangan sampah
a. Tidak ada
b. Lubang tanah galian
c. Tong sampah
7. Cara pengolahan sampah
a. Tidak diolah dan dibiarkan berserakan
b. Dibakar
c. Diangkut petugas kebersihan

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Lampiran 3
Frequency Table

Status Gizi Anak


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Gizi Baik 58 55.2 55.2 55.2
Gizi Kurang 36 34.3 34.3 89.5
Gizi Buruk 11 10.5 10.5 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Kategori Status Gizi Anak


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Gizi Kurang 47 44.8 44.8 44.8
Valid Gizi Baik 58 55.2 55.2 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Jenis kelamin balita


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Laki-Laki 53 50.5 50.5 50.5
Valid Perempuan 52 49.5 49.5 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Berat Badan Lahir


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
BBLR 26 24.8 24.8 24.8
Valid Normal 79 75.2 75.2 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Status Imunisasi
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak Lengkap 18 17.1 17.1 17.1
Valid Lengkap 87 82.9 82.9 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Status pemberian ASI Eksklusif
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak 65 61.9 61.9 61.9
Valid Ya 40 38.1 38.1 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Status pemberian kolostrum


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak 55 52.4 52.4 52.4
Valid Ya 50 47.6 47.6 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan ibu
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Pendidikan Rendah 80 76.2 76.2 76.2
Valid Pendidikan Tinggi 25 23.8 23.8 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Kurang 71 67.6 67.6 67.6
Valid Baik 34 32.4 32.4 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan ibu
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Bekerja 8 7.6 7.6 7.6
Valid Tidak Bekerja 97 92.4 92.4 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Jumlah anak dalam keluarga
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
1 25 23.8 23.8 23.8
2 48 45.7 45.7 69.5
3 19 18.1 18.1 87.6
Valid 4 8 7.6 7.6 95.2
5 4 3.8 3.8 99.0
6 1 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

ISPA
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid ISPA 69 65.7 65.7 65.7
Tidak ISPA 36 34.3 34.3 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Diare
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Diare 47 44.8 44.8 44.8
Valid Tidak Diare 58 55.2 55.2 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Sumber air minum keluarga


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Sumur gali 72 68.6 68.6 68.6
PAM/SUmur bor 1 1.0 1.0 69.5
Valid
Air kemasan 32 30.5 30.5 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Kebiasaan minum keluarga


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak dimasak 22 21.0 21.0 21.0
Valid Dimasak sampai mendidih 83 79.0 79.0 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara


kondisi air minum
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
keruh, berasa dan berbau 41 39.0 39.0 39.0
bening, tidak berasa dan
5 4.8 4.8 43.8
berbau
Valid
bening, tidak berasa dan
59 56.2 56.2 100.0
tidak berbau
Total 105 100.0 100.0

tipe jamban
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Cemplung 10 9.5 9.5 9.5
Valid Jamban leher angsa 95 90.5 90.5 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

keadaan jamban
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak terwat sama sekali 8 7.6 7.6 7.6
Jarang dibersihkan 26 24.8 24.8 32.4
Valid
Terawat dan bersih 71 67.6 67.6 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

jenis tempat pembuangan sampah


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
tidak ada 45 42.9 42.9 42.9
Lubang tanah galian 38 36.2 36.2 79.0
Valid
Tong sampah 22 21.0 21.0 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

cara pengolahan sampah


Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak diolah dan dibiarkan
14 13.3 13.3 13.3
berserakan
Valid Dibakar 91 86.7 86.7 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Kesehatan lingkungan
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Tidak baik 17 16.2 16.2 16.2
Valid Baik 88 83.8 83.8 100.0
Total 105 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jenis kelamin balita * Status
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Gizi Anak
Berat Badan Lahir * Status
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Gizi Anak
Status Imunisasi * Status
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Gizi Anak
Status pemberian ASI
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Eksklusif * Status Gizi Anak
Status pemberian kolostrum
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
* Status Gizi Anak
Pendidikan ibu * Status Gizi
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Anak
Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu *
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Status Gizi Anak
Pekerjaan ibu * Status Gizi
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Anak
Jumlah anak dalam keluarga
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
* Status Gizi Anak
ISPA * Status Gizi Anak 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Diare * Status Gizi Anak 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Kesehatan lingkungan *
105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
Status Gizi Anak

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Jenis kelamin balita * Status Gizi Anak
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Jenis kelamin balita Laki-Laki Count 23 30 53
Expected Count 23.7 29.3 53.0
% within Jenis kelamin balita 43.4% 56.6% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 48.9% 51.7% 50.5%
% of Total 21.9% 28.6% 50.5%
Perempuan Count 24 28 52
Expected Count 23.3 28.7 52.0
% within Jenis kelamin balita 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 51.1% 48.3% 49.5%
% of Total 22.9% 26.7% 49.5%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Jenis kelamin balita 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .081a 1 .776
Continuity Correctionb .008 1 .930
Likelihood Ratio .081 1 .776
Fisher's Exact Test .845 .465
Linear-by-Linear Association .080 1 .777
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.28.

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .081a 1 .776
b
Continuity Correction .008 1 .930
Likelihood Ratio .081 1 .776
Fisher's Exact Test .845 .465
Linear-by-Linear Association .080 1 .777
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.28.
c. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Jenis kelamin
balita (Laki-Laki Chi-Square
/ .894 Tests .414 1.931
Perempuan)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.940 .615 1.438
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.051 .745 1.484
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Berat Badan Lahir * Status Gizi Anak


Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Berat Badan Lahir BBLR Count 23 3 26
Expected Count 11.6 14.4 26.0
% within Berat Badan Lahir 88.5% 11.5% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 48.9% 5.2% 24.8%
% of Total 21.9% 2.9% 24.8%
Normal Count 24 55 79
Expected Count 35.4 43.6 79.0
% within Berat Badan Lahir 30.4% 69.6% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 51.1% 94.8% 75.2%
% of Total 22.9% 52.4% 75.2%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Berat Badan Lahir 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square a
26.690 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb 24.392 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 28.790 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 26.436 1 .000
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.64.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Berat Badan
17.569 4.812 64.156
Lahir (BBLR / Normal)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
2.912 2.028 4.180
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.166 .057 .485
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Status Imunisasi * Status Gizi Anak
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Status Imunisasi Tidak Lengkap Count 11 7 18
Expected Count 8.1 9.9 18.0
% within Status Imunisasi 61.1% 38.9% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 12.1% 17.1%
% of Total 10.5% 6.7% 17.1%
Lengkap Count 36 51 87
Expected Count 38.9 48.1 87.0
% within Status Imunisasi 41.4% 58.6% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 87.9% 82.9%
% of Total 34.3% 48.6% 82.9%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Status Imunisasi 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.348a 1 .125
b
Continuity Correction 1.618 1 .203
Likelihood Ratio 2.341 1 .126
Fisher's Exact Test .192 .102
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.326 1 .127
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Status
Imunisasi (Tidak Lengkap / 2.226 .787 6.294
Lengkap)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.477 .946 2.305
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.663 .362 1.215
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Status pemberian ASI Eksklusif * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Status pemberian ASI Tidak Count 29 36 65
Eksklusif
Expected Count 29.1 35.9 65.0
% within Status pemberian
44.6% 55.4% 100.0%
ASI Eksklusif
% within Status Gizi Anak 61.7% 62.1% 61.9%
% of Total 27.6% 34.3% 61.9%
Ya Count 18 22 40
Expected Count 17.9 22.1 40.0
% within Status pemberian
45.0% 55.0% 100.0%
ASI Eksklusif
% within Status Gizi Anak 38.3% 37.9% 38.1%
% of Total 17.1% 21.0% 38.1%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Status pemberian
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
ASI Eksklusif
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .001a 1 .969
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .001 1 .969
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .564
Linear-by-Linear Association .001 1 .969
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.90.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Status
pemberian ASI Eksklusif .985 .446 2.174
(Tidak / Ya)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.991 .641 1.534
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.007 .706 1.436
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Status pemberian kolostrum * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Status pemberian kolostrum Tidak Count 38 17 55
Expected Count 24.6 30.4 55.0
% within Status pemberian
69.1% 30.9% 100.0%
kolostrum
% within Status Gizi Anak 80.9% 29.3% 52.4%
% of Total 36.2% 16.2% 52.4%
Ya Count 9 41 50
Expected Count 22.4 27.6 50.0
% within Status pemberian
18.0% 82.0% 100.0%
kolostrum
% within Status Gizi Anak 19.1% 70.7% 47.6%
% of Total 8.6% 39.0% 47.6%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Status pemberian
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
kolostrum
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 27.649a 1 .000
b
Continuity Correction 25.622 1 .000
Likelihood Ratio 29.246 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 27.386 1 .000
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.38.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Status
pemberian kolostrum (Tidak / 10.183 4.056 25.569
Ya)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
3.838 2.070 7.117
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.377 .249 .571
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Pendidikan ibu * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Pendidikan ibu Pendidikan Rendah Count 39 41 80
Expected Count 35.8 44.2 80.0
% within Pendidikan ibu 48.8% 51.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 83.0% 70.7% 76.2%
% of Total 37.1% 39.0% 76.2%
Pendidikan Tinggi Count 8 17 25
Expected Count 11.2 13.8 25.0
% within Pendidikan ibu 32.0% 68.0% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 17.0% 29.3% 23.8%
% of Total 7.6% 16.2% 23.8%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Pendidikan ibu 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.161a 1 .142
b
Continuity Correction 1.537 1 .215
Likelihood Ratio 2.209 1 .137
Fisher's Exact Test .171 .107
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.141 1 .143
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.19.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pendidikan
ibu (Pendidikan Rendah / 2.021 .783 5.215
Pendidikan Tinggi)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.523 .824 2.815
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.754 .535 1.063
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Tingkat Pengetahuan ibu Kurang Count 33 38 71
Expected Count 31.8 39.2 71.0
% within Tingkat
46.5% 53.5% 100.0%
Pengetahuan ibu
% within Status Gizi Anak 70.2% 65.5% 67.6%
% of Total 31.4% 36.2% 67.6%
Baik Count 14 20 34
Expected Count 15.2 18.8 34.0
% within Tingkat
41.2% 58.8% 100.0%
Pengetahuan ibu
% within Status Gizi Anak 29.8% 34.5% 32.4%
% of Total 13.3% 19.0% 32.4%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Tingkat
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
Pengetahuan ibu
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .261a 1 .609
b
Continuity Correction .091 1 .763
Likelihood Ratio .262 1 .609
Fisher's Exact Test .678 .383
Linear-by-Linear Association .259 1 .611
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.22.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval


Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Tingkat
Pengetahuan ibu (Kurang / 1.241 .543 2.837
Baik)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.129 .703 1.811
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.910 .638 1.298
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Pekerjaan ibu * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Pekerjaan ibu Bekerja Count 4 4 8
Expected Count 3.6 4.4 8.0
% within Pekerjaan ibu 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 8.5% 6.9% 7.6%
% of Total 3.8% 3.8% 7.6%
Tidak Bekerja Count 43 54 97
Expected Count 43.4 53.6 97.0
% within Pekerjaan ibu 44.3% 55.7% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 91.5% 93.1% 92.4%
% of Total 41.0% 51.4% 92.4%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Pekerjaan ibu 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .096a 1 .757
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .096 1 .757
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .519
Linear-by-Linear Association .095 1 .758
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.58.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Pekerjaan ibu
1.256 .297 5.314
(Bekerja / Tidak Bekerja)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.128 .545 2.336
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.898 .439 1.837
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Jumlah anak dalam keluarga * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Jumlah anak dalam keluarga >=3 orang Count 14 18 32
Expected Count 14.3 17.7 32.0
% within Jumlah anak dalam
43.8% 56.2% 100.0%
keluarga
% within Status Gizi Anak 29.8% 31.0% 30.5%
% of Total 13.3% 17.1% 30.5%
1-2 orang Count 33 40 73
Expected Count 32.7 40.3 73.0
% within Jumlah anak dalam
45.2% 54.8% 100.0%
keluarga
% within Status Gizi Anak 70.2% 69.0% 69.5%
% of Total 31.4% 38.1% 69.5%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Jumlah anak dalam
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
keluarga
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square a
.019 1 .890
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .019 1 .890
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .531
Linear-by-Linear Association .019 1 .891
N of Valid Casesb 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.32.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Jumlah anak
dalam keluarga (>=3 orang / .943 .408 2.177
1-2 orang)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.968 .607 1.544
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.027 .709 1.486
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

ISPA * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
ISPA ISPA Count 36 33 69
Expected Count 30.9 38.1 69.0
% within ISPA 52.2% 47.8% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 56.9% 65.7%
% of Total 34.3% 31.4% 65.7%
Tidak ISPA Count 11 25 36
Expected Count 16.1 19.9 36.0
% within ISPA 30.6% 69.4% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 43.1% 34.3%
% of Total 10.5% 23.8% 34.3%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within ISPA 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.472a 1 .034
b
Continuity Correction 3.640 1 .056
Likelihood Ratio 4.567 1 .033
Fisher's Exact Test .040 .027
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.429 1 .035
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.11.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for ISPA (ISPA /
2.479 1.058 5.813
Tidak ISPA)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.708 .993 2.935
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.689 .496 .956
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Diare * Status Gizi Anak
Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Diare Diare Count 27 20 47
Expected Count 21.0 26.0 47.0
% within Diare 57.4% 42.6% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 57.4% 34.5% 44.8%
% of Total 25.7% 19.0% 44.8%
Tidak Diare Count 20 38 58
Expected Count 26.0 32.0 58.0
% within Diare 34.5% 65.5% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 42.6% 65.5% 55.2%
% of Total 19.0% 36.2% 55.2%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Diare 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5.537a 1 .019
Continuity Correctionb 4.647 1 .031
Likelihood Ratio 5.571 1 .018
Fisher's Exact Test .029 .015
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.484 1 .019
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.04.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Diare (Diare /
2.565 1.162 5.664
Tidak Diare)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.666 1.082 2.565
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.649 .444 .951
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Kesehatan lingkungan * Status Gizi Anak

Crosstab
Status Gizi Anak
Total
Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik
Kesehatan lingkungan Tidak baik Count 11 6 17
Expected Count 7.6 9.4 17.0
% within Kesehatan
64.7% 35.3% 100.0%
lingkungan
% within Status Gizi Anak 23.4% 10.3% 16.2%
% of Total 10.5% 5.7% 16.2%
Baik Count 36 52 88
Expected Count 39.4 48.6 88.0
% within Kesehatan
40.9% 59.1% 100.0%
lingkungan
% within Status Gizi Anak 76.6% 89.7% 83.8%
% of Total 34.3% 49.5% 83.8%
Total Count 47 58 105
Expected Count 47.0 58.0 105.0
% within Kesehatan
44.8% 55.2% 100.0%
lingkungan
% within Status Gizi Anak 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df
sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.263a 1 .071
b
Continuity Correction 2.372 1 .124
Likelihood Ratio 3.263 1 .071
Fisher's Exact Test .109 .062
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.232 1 .072
b
N of Valid Cases 105
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.61.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate
95% Confidence Interval
Value
Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Kesehatan
lingkungan (Tidak baik / 2.648 .898 7.811
Baik)
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
1.582 1.027 2.435
= Gizi Kurang
For cohort Status Gizi Anak
.597 .307 1.163
= Gizi Baik
N of Valid Cases 105

Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary


a
Unweighted Cases N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 105 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 105 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 105 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of
cases.

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Dependent Variable Encoding
Original Value Internal Value
Gizi Kurang 0
Gizi Baik 1

Block 0: Beginning Block


a,b
Classification Table

Predicted

Status Gizi Anak


Percentage
Observed Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik Correct
Step 0 Status Gizi Anak Gizi Kurang 0 47 .0
Gizi Baik 0 58 100.0
Overall Percentage 55.2
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)


Step 0 Constant .210 .196 1.148 1 .284 1.234

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables BBLk 26.690 1 .000
Imunlkap 2.348 1 .125
KoLs 27.649 1 .000
didikk 2.161 1 .142
ISPA 4.472 1 .034
Diare 5.537 1 .019
Lingk 3.263 1 .071
Overall Statistics 47.617 7 .000

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 57.855 7 .000
Block 57.855 7 .000
Model 57.855 7 .000
a
Step 6 Step -2.013 1 .156
Block 52.250 3 .000
Model 52.250 2 .000
a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-
squares value has decreased from the previous step.

Model Summary
Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
1 86.551a .424 .567
b
6 92.157 .392 .525
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.
b. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because
parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test


Step Chi-square df Sig.
1 6.362 8 .607
6 2.688 4 .611

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Status Gizi Anak = Gizi Kurang Status Gizi Anak = Gizi Baik

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total


Step 1 1 12 11.657 0 .343 12
2 11 9.955 0 1.045 11
3 7 8.077 4 2.923 11
4 7 5.699 3 4.301 10
5 3 4.920 8 6.080 11
6 2 3.195 9 7.805 11
7 3 1.719 8 9.281 11
8 1 .927 9 9.073 10
9 1 .614 10 10.386 11
10 0 .236 7 6.764 7
Step 6 1 4 3.926 0 .074 4
2 16 15.098 0 .902 16
3 8 8.528 4 3.472 12
4 13 14.424 16 14.576 29
5 1 1.680 6 5.320 7
6 5 3.344 32 33.656 37

Classification Tablea

Predicted

Status Gizi Anak


Percentage
Observed Gizi Kurang Gizi Baik Correct
Step 1 Status Gizi Anak Gizi Kurang 36 11 76.6
Gizi Baik 7 51 87.9
Overall Percentage 82.9
Step 6 Status Gizi Anak Gizi Kurang 28 19 59.6
Gizi Baik 4 54 93.1
Overall Percentage 78.1
a. The cut value is .500

Universitas Sumatera Utara


Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper


Step 1a BBLk 2.583 .778 11.013 1 .001 13.237 2.879 60.857
Imunlkap 1.097 .723 2.299 1 .129 2.995 .725 12.366
KoLs 2.342 .578 16.393 1 .000 10.402 3.348 32.319
didikk .787 .649 1.471 1 .225 2.196 .616 7.832
ISPA .347 .572 .367 1 .545 1.414 .461 4.344
Diare .779 .557 1.954 1 .162 2.179 .731 6.494
Lingk .852 .741 1.323 1 .250 2.345 .549 10.021
Constant -13.960 3.118 20.044 1 .000 .000
a
Step 6 BBLk 2.828 .744 14.435 1 .000 16.905 3.931 72.697
Imunlkap 1.156 .699 2.737 1 .098 3.177 .808 12.496
KoLs 2.299 .552 17.319 1 .000 9.960 3.374 29.402
Constant -10.255 2.315 19.617 1 .000 .000
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: BBLk, Imunlkap, KoLs, didikk, ISPA, Diare, Lingk.

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
a
Step 6 Variables didikk 1.859 1 .173
ISPA .491 1 .483
Diare 1.680 1 .195
Lingk 1.991 1 .158
Overall Statistics 5.325 4 .256
a. Variable(s) removed on step 5: Lingk.

Step Summarya,b
Improvement Model
Correct Class
Step Chi-square df Sig. Chi-square df Sig. % Variable
2 -.369 1 .544 57.486 6 .000 81.9% OUT: ISPA
3 -1.526 1 .217 55.961 5 .000 81.9% OUT: didikk
4 -1.698 1 .192 54.262 4 .000 79.0% OUT: Diare
5 -2.013 1 .156 52.250 3 .000 78.1% OUT: Lingk
a. No more variables can be deleted from or added to the current model.
b. End block: 1

Universitas Sumatera Utara

Anda mungkin juga menyukai