REVIEW LITERATUR
Disusun Oleh:
1
KATA PENGANTAR
Puji syukur kehadirat Allah SWT yang telah memberikan rahmat dan hidayah-Nya
sehingga penulis dapat menyelesaikan tugas Evidence Based Midwifery tentang perumusan
masalah klinis yang dapat dijawab dalam tahapan EBM dan mencari jurnal di
www.pubmed.gov.
Dalam tugas ini terdapat rumusan pertanyaan tentang intervensi, etiologi, diagnosis,
prognosis, frekwensi dan fenomena. Kami menggunakan analisis PICO yaitu menentukan
Populasi dan masalah klinis terlebih dahulu, dilanjutkan dengan indikator, kemudian
Comparator dan menentukan outcomenya. Kemudian dari rumusan tersebut kami mencoba
mencari jurnal di sesuai materi kuliah sebelumnya.
Kami berharap mudah-mudahan tugas ini dapat berguna untuk pembelajaran EBM di
kelas dan menjadi pengetahuan baru bagi kita semua.. Kami menyadari bahwa penulisan
tugas ini masih perlu disempurnakan. Oleh sebab itu kami mengharapkan segala saran dan
kritik yang membangun sehubungan dengan tugas EBM ini.
Penulis
2
PERUMUSAN PERTANYAAN KLINIS YANG DAPAT DIJAWAB DALAM
TAHAPAN EBM
PICO merupakan sarana yang dapat digunakan untuk membantu dalam pencarian
informasi klinis. PICO merupakan metode pencarian informasi klinis yang merupakan
akronim dari 4 komponen: P (patient, population, problem), I (intervention, prognostic factor,
exposure), C (comparison, control), dan O (outcome)
PROGNOSIS
a. Kasus
Giska Berusia 18 tahun saat melahirkan bayinya. Ia memilih menikah muda
dan tidak melanjutkan sekolahnya. Persalinan giska di tolong oleh bidan. Bayi lahir
dengan berat 2500 gram. Setelah bayinya lahir giska terlihat sangat canggung,
begitupun dengan suaminya, karena dari segi usia giska termasuk primipara yang
masih berusia remaja.
Masalah dimulai ketika ASI giska tidak keluar saat bayinya menyusu. Bidan
menjelaskan itu adalah hal yang wajar, dan mengajarkan giska teknik menyusui
yang benar. Melihat bayinya yang terus menangis dan susah untuk didiamkan
giska mulai gundah. Kadang sampai ikut menangis. Hari kedua giska sudah
diperbolehkan pulang dari klinik bidan. Tapi suami giska mengatakan kalau istrinya
tidak tidur dari kemarin,dan mengeluh nyeri kepala. Bidanpun memutuskan untuk
memberikan psikoedukasi pada giska dan suami sebelum pulang.
3
c. Pertanyaan Klinis
Pada ibu primipara usia remaja apakah pemberian psikoedukasi dapat
mencegah terjadinya baby blues dibanding yang tidak mendapatkannya?
Pada ibu yang mengalami baby blues apa efek selanjutnya jika tidak
diantisipasi?
4
LANGKAH LANGKAH PENELUSURAN JURNAL YANG BERHUBUNGAN
DENGAN KASUS DIATAS, di SITUS https://www.pubmed.gov
5
3. Klik pada All fields, Pilih Title / Abstract, Isikan keyword pertama sesuai PICO
beserta sinonimnya dalam bahasa inggris. Dan ganti pilihan AND menjadi OR.
Contoh pada kasus in: Psichoeducation, psichology.
4. Selanjutnya klik Add to history. Pada bagian history akan muncul keyword yang
kita masukkan tadi dengan jumahnya.
Kemudian lakukan hal yang sama pada keyword kedua, pada kasus diatas
keywordnya primipara dan primiparous.
6
5. Lakukan hal yang sama seperti pada langkah diatas klik Add to history. Dan
sekarang sudah ada dua history pada bagian bawah
7
7. Sekarang sudah muncul 4 buah history pada tabel. Jumlah angka yang terlihat
menunjukkan abstract yang similar dengan pencarian kita. Kemudian gabungkan
dengan klik tanda pagar dan angka pada kolom search (#2 #3 #4 #5 ) pilih AND in
builder
8. Setelah semua kita klik , history tadi akan muncul otomatis pada fields Builder.
Kemudian klik Add to history.
8
9. Kemudian pada tabel history muncul gabungan dari semua keyword yang kita cari
tadi dengan jumlah items found paling sedikit dari query lainnya. Dan jumlah itu
adalah hasil pencarian yang paling mendekati dengan yang kita maksud. Klik angka
tersebut untuk menuju link Abstract.
10. Klik judul yang paling kita cari. Kita juga bisa klik similar articles untuk
mendapatkan hasil pencarian yang lebih banyak.
9
11. Pada pilihan Similar articles, judul yang mendekati jadi lebih banyak.
12. Klik link judul dan artikel atau abstract yang dicari sudah bisa dilihat. Bisa
download file ataupun request send to email.
10
Lampiran jurnal
Ride J(1), Lorgelly P(1)(2), Tran T(3), Wynter K(3), Rowe H(3), Fisher J(3).
Author information:
(1)Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
(2)Office of Health Economics, London, UK.
(3)Jean Hailes Research Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
OBJECTIVES: Postnatal maternal mental health problems, including depression and anxiety,
entail a significant burden globally, and finding cost-effectivepreventive solutions is a public
policy priority. This paper presents acost-effectiveness analysis of the intervention, What
Were We Thinking (WWWT), for the prevention of postnatal maternal mental health
problems.
DESIGN: The economic evaluation, including cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, was
conducted alongside a cluster-randomised trial.
11
OUTCOME MEASURES: The evaluation considered public sector plus participant out-of-
pocket costs, while outcomes were expressed in the 30-day prevalence of depression,
anxiety and adjustment disorders, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental costs
and outcomes were estimated using regression analyses to account for relevant
sociodemographic, prognostic and clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: The intervention was estimated to cost $A118.16 per participant. The analysis
showed no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups
in costs or outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $A36 451 per QALY
gained and $A152 per percentage-point reduction in 30-day prevalence of depression,
anxiety and adjustment disorders. The estimate lies under the unofficial cost-effectiveness
threshold of $A55 000 per QALY; however, there was considerable uncertainty surrounding
the results, with a 55% probability that WWWT would be considered cost-effective at that
threshold.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already
granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-
services/rights-and-licensing/.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012086
PMCID: PMC5128834
PMID: 27864246 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
Conflict of interest statement: Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
12
1. BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 23;10:432. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-432.
Author information:
(1)Centre for Women's Health, Gender and Society, Melbourne School of Population
Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. jrwf@unimelb.edu.au
METHODS: A before and after controlled study was conducted in primary care in seven local
government areas in Victoria, Australia. English-speaking couples with one-week old infants
were invited consecutively to participate by the maternal and child health nurse at the
universal first home visit. Two groups were recruited and followed sequentially: both
completed telephone interviews at four weeks and six months postpartum and received
standard health care. Intervention group participants were also invited to attend a half-day
program with up to five couples and one month old infants, facilitated by trained,
supervised nurses. The main outcome was any Composite International Diagnostic Interview
(CIDI) diagnosis of Depression or Anxiety or Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood,
Anxiety, or Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood in the first six months postpartum. Factors
associated with the outcome were established by logistic regression controlling for potential
confounders and analysis was by intention to treat.
13
RESULTS: In total 399/646 (62%) women were recruited; 210 received only standard care
and 189 were also offered the intervention; 364 (91%) were retained at follow up six
months postpartum. In women without a psychiatric history (232/364; 64%), 36/125 (29%)
were diagnosed with Depression or Anxiety or Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood,
Anxiety, or Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood in the control group, compared with 16/107
(15%) in the intervention group. In those without a psychiatric history, the adjusted odds
ratio for diagnosis of a common postpartum mental disorder was 0.43 (95% CI 0.21, 0.89) in
the intervention group compared to the control group.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-432
PMCID: PMC2920889
PMID: 20653934 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
14
1. BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 7;6(3):e009396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009396.
Fisher J(1), Rowe H(1), Wynter K(1), Tran T(1), Lorgelly P(2), Amir LH(3),
Proimos J(4), Ranasinha S(5), Hiscock H(6), Bayer J(7), Cann W(8).
Author information:
(1)Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash
University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(2)Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne,
Victoria, Australia.
(3)Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(4)Victorian Department of Education and Training, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(5)Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and
Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(6)Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of
Paediatrics, Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, University of
Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(7)Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School
ofPsychological Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
(8)Parenting Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
15
SETTING: 48 Maternal and Child Health Centres (MCHCs) from 6 Local Government Areas in
Melbourne, Australia were allocated randomly to usual care (24) or usualcare plus WWWT
(24). PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking primiparous women receiving primary care at trial
MCHCs were recruited to the intervention (204) and control (196) conditions. Ofthese, 187
(91.7%) and 177 (90.3%) provided complete data.
CONCLUSIONS: WWWT is readily integrated into primary care, enables inclusion of fathers
and addresses modifiable risks for PCMD directly. The full intervention appears a promising
programme for preventing PCMD, optimising family functioning, and as the first component
of a stepped approach to mental healthcare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613000506796; Results.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not
already granted under a licence) please go to
http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009396
PMCID: PMC4785308
PMID: 26951210 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
16
Daftar Pustaka
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951210
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20653934
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27864246
17