Log Example feo @— ER en ree taper on A) Top & Bottom of the sand (reservoir) sections 1805 B) Thickness of individual sand layers enti aoe oy wrelteeg J MET PE : + ORAS ps wos + er rang. | bot MP Ma ©) Total Thickness of sand (Net Reservoir) 1810 bt the 2 2 D) Fraction reservoir within the interval (Net to Gross) + N/G = (hi+h2)y/H + Fea1.95 1800 1805 1810 1815 0.1 Corr -0.1 ° FDC (g/em?) 2.95 —— au sar age ais Mudlog ... Density Log (Cont'd) rom the cutting desc. The lithologies of a Limestone Shale Sandstone Shale logged interval are known. FDG curve on the loft and determine the porosity (#) and average porosity (6) of sandstone and Limestone layers To calculate the average porvsity of an interval take the average of the porosities of all block (i), weighted for the thickness of the blocks (hi) Li *hi Lhi ® Wm Sandchve + 245 9/om> Lnsesnve = BAT fea de Frm Fron = PF Mineevme Ff = 2H = 880 ag eg aan Lawations > pa RAE ~ Ones 19, bscnt ap.» ssstsee Neutron Log (Cont’d) From the Cutt Desc lithologies are known. There are no gas bearing formation. Determine the true porosity using CNL curve and coor. Chart below for depth: 1802, 1805, 1810 and 1815 and also find true porosity average of Dolomite. Shale wal anate wy Neutron Porosity Correction Dolomite | 1805 Depth (mbdf) True (p.u) Limestone | 1 g49] Shale oO 10 20 30 40 lsandstone 1815} Neutron @ (p.u.)FDC (glem3) 1.95 2.45 2.95 CC - ew 49 30 CNL_O_-15 1800 ‘ne Fees 1805 Porat: uiectine Dotonsit. 1810 Shale cau at leant, isis sad oe . Density / Neutron Log Combination (Cont'd) ‘The following lithology tipe were encountered (not in sequence): Sandstone, Limestone, Dolomite, Shale and salt, the gas chromatograph indicated gas peak. Determine: |_ 2) _Lithology all interval b) Porosity in Reservoir Rock Dotematie , Cimeirrne . sainet rrasueie se coe plee yn te ©) The gas bearing interval (what the porosity if it assumed as Sandstone?Example: 400 BHCS(js/m) 100 4 siayoyen Determine: 2500 $TA _$FO a) The interval below consist of Dolomite. Calculate the porosities from sonic log (use “Porosity evaluation chart in next page) b) What could cause the eratic log behaviour from 2506-2508 mbaf? leim acaunyn 9 @ 6 an 80 2510 2520 253002 UD (ote) mw zy a2 LES (ohm-m) wry GAAP 92 MSFL(chmam) me 2000 * Ne iii 2010 a 2020 e ae 2030 .. Resistivity Log (Cont'd) ‘The logs on the left are taken in an interval which consist almost ‘entirely of sandstone reservoir of Uniform porosity. A small shale ‘streak and a shale bods within the sand show up clearly on the GR. a) Why do the MSFL, LLS and LLd overlay across the shale bed? b) _Partof the reservoir is oil bearing. Where is the OWC ©) What can conclude from the fact that MSFL and LLD read the same resistivity in water interval? Pamg = Bw d) Log header: Rmf= 0.12 ohmm @ 23°C; BHT= 60° C. use the char: to determine Rw €) Use the ratio methods to determine the average Sw in oil bearing . em eg > WY" ) Use the ratio methods to determine residual oil saturation in the invaded zone. ~ xt Shxo= 1 - Swxo=siseeee- Pickett Plot (Cont'd) * Across a water bearing interv porosities were calculated using a density log and true resistivities were taken from deep resistivity log: 6 2h 200-27 32 frac E Ro 35 49 30 20 1.0 60 ohmm Fe 01 0.01 * An oil bearing interval in the same formation 0.01 ot 1 has constant por of 25%. The measured Rt of Porosiey this interval is 25 chm. Calculate the Sw using Archie second eq.