Lampiran 8

MASTER TABEL

HUBUNGAN INISIASI MENYUSUI DINI DENGAN KELANCARAN

PRODUKSI ASI PADA IBU POST PARTUM DI RUANG BERSALIN RSU
GMIM PANCARAN KASIH MANADO

InisiasiMenyusuiDin
N Inisia AnakKe KelancaranPengeluaranAsi
Usia Pendidikan Pekerjaan i
o l -
Jumlah Kode Jumlah Kode
1 M.W 23 4 1 1 17 2 36 1
2 A.H 19 4 1 1 19 1 48 1
3 S.W 28 4 1 3 24 1 50 1
4 A.O 29 5 2 2 24 1 20 2
5 C.A 29 4 1 3 21 1 35 1
6 N.L 28 5 3 2 23 1 45 1
7 J.O 26 3 1 2 16 2 27 2
8 N.H 26 5 3 2 22 1 30 2
9 E.L 25 4 1 2 20 1 50 1
10 K.A 28 4 1 3 18 1 45 1
11 D.F 16 2 1 1 16 2 29 2
12 W.M 19 4 1 2 22 1 45 1
13 Y.P 19 4 1 1 21 1 45 1
14 M 20 4 1 2 15 2 29 2
15 I.M 21 4 1 1 18 1 32 1
16 R.D 25 4 1 1 19 1 39 1
17 F.B 29 4 1 3 20 1 40 1
18 R.M 30 4 1 3 20 1 39 1
19 R.K 29 5 3 2 23 1 60 1
20 I.L 31 4 1 3 20 1 35 1
21 R.B 28 4 1 2 20 1 40 1
22 P.R 29 4 1 2 21 1 31 2
23 I.K 25 4 1 2 21 1 40 1
24 A.S 29 4 1 3 19 1 35 1
25 R.L 26 4 1 2 19 1 34 1
26 T.I 24 4 1 2 20 1 42 1
27 J.Q 23 4 1 2 21 1 43 1
28 S.M 23 4 1 2 19 1 43 1
29 E.P 23 4 1 2 19 1 39 1
30 A.C 21 4 1 1 17 2 32 2

Umur :

1. 16 – 20 Tahun
2. 21 - 25 Tahun
 3. 26 - 30 Tahun
4. 31 – 35 Tahun

Pendidikan :

1. Tidaksekolah
2. SD
3. SMP
4. SMA
5. PT

Pekerjaan

1. IRT
2. PNS
3. Swasta
4. Lainnya
 Lampiran 9

UJI STATISTIK

requencies

Statistics

PendidikanResp PekerjaanRespo InisiasiMenyusui KelancaranPeng

UsiaResponden onden nden Dini eluaran ASI

N Valid 30 30 30 30 30

Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2.37 4.03 1.23 1.17 1.23

Median 2.50 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Mode 3 4 1 1 1

Frequency Table
UsiaResponden

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 16 - 20 Tahun 5 16.7 16.7 16.7

21 - 25 Tahun 10 33.3 33.3 50.0

26 - 30 Tahun 14 46.7 46.7 96.7

31 - Tahun 1 3.3 3.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

PendidikanResponden

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid SD 1 3.3 3.3 3.3

SMP 1 3.3 3.3 6.7

SMA 24 80.0 80.0 86.7

PT 4 13.3 13.3 100.0

 UsiaResponden

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 16 - 20 Tahun 5 16.7 16.7 16.7

21 - 25 Tahun 10 33.3 33.3 50.0

26 - 30 Tahun 14 46.7 46.7 96.7

31 - Tahun 1 3.3 3.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

PekerjaanResponden

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid IRT 26 86.7 86.7 86.7

PNS 1 3.3 3.3 90.0

Swasta 3 10.0 10.0 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

IMD

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid TEPAT 25 83.3 83.3 83.3

KURANG TEPAT 5 16.7 16.7 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

 Lampiran 9

KELANCARANASI

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid LANCAR 23 76.7 76.7 76.7

KURANG LANCAR 7 23.3 23.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs

IMD * KELANCARANASI Crosstabulation

KELANCARANASI

KURANG
LANCAR LANCAR Total

IMD TEPAT Count 22 3 25

Expected Count 19.2 5.8 25.0

% of Total 73.3% 10.0% 83.3%

KURANG TEPAT Count 1 4 5

Expected Count 3.8 1.2 5.0

% of Total 3.3% 13.3% 16.7%

Total Count 23 7 30

Expected Count 23.0 7.0 30.0

% of Total 76.7% 23.3% 100.0%

 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 10.770a 1 .001

Continuity Correctionb 7.304 1 .007

Likelihood Ratio 9.246 1 .002

Fisher's Exact Test .006 .006

Linear-by-Linear Association 10.411 1 .001

N of Valid Casesb 30

a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.17.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for IMD (TEPAT /

29.333 2.404 357.848
KURANG TEPAT)

For cohort
KELANCARANASI = 4.400 .758 25.549
LANCAR

For cohort
KELANCARANASI = .150 .048 .473
KURANG LANCAR

N of Valid Cases 30