Laporan Analisis Penanganan Geoteknik Cijago Seksi III

PERHITUNGAN GEOTEKNIK
ANALISIS PENANGANAN GEOTEKNIK
Cinere Jagorawi Seksi III
PT. PERENTJANA DJAJA

2020
1
DAFTAR ISI
BAB 1 DATA PERENCANAAN ............................................................................................. 4
1.1 Standar Acuan ............................................................................................................. 4
1.2 Kriteria Desain ............................................................................................................ 4
1.3 Spesifikasi Pembebanan .............................................................................................. 5
1.4 Data Umum ................................................................................................................. 6
1.5 Data Penyelidikan Tanah ............................................................................................ 6
a. Hasil uji N-SPT lapangan ........................................................................................ 1-8
b. Muka Air tanah ...................................................................................................... 12
c. Parameter gempa ....................................................................................................... 13
BAB 2 Metode Analisis Penanganan Geoteknik Pada Rencana Tol CIJAGO Seksi III ......... 14
BAB 3 ANALISIS TOL CIJAGO SEKSI IIIA ....................................................................... 20
3.1. Main Road ................................................................................................................. 20
a. STA 12+725 .............................................................................................................. 20
b. STA 12+775 .......................................................................................................... 22
c. STA 13+350 .............................................................................................................. 24
d. STA 13+375 .......................................................................................................... 26
e. STA 14+100 .............................................................................................................. 29
f. STA 14+550 .............................................................................................................. 32
3.2. Ramp 2 Krukut Junction ........................................................................................... 40
a. STA 0+325 ................................................................................................................ 40
3.3. Ramp 5 ...................................................................................................................... 50
a. STA 1+375 ................................................................................................................ 50
3.4. OP Tanah Baru + Jalan Lokal ................................................................................... 53
BAB 4 ANALISIS TOL CIJAGO SEKSI III B ...................................................................... 63
4.1. Main Road ................................................................................................................. 63
2
a. STA 9+314 ................................................................................................................ 63
b. STA 9+500 ............................................................................................................ 65
c. STA 10+025 .............................................................................................................. 68
d. STA 10+450 .......................................................................................................... 70
e. STA 11+100 .............................................................................................................. 72
4.2. On Ramp Limo 1 ....................................................................................................... 75
KESIMPULAN ........................................................................................................................ 78
3
1. BAB 1
DATA PERENCANAAN
1.1 Standar Acuan

1. Bridge Design Code Vol. 1 dan Vol. 2 Bridge Management System (BMS)
1992,Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum.
2. Bridge Desain Manual Vol. 1 dan Vol. 2 Bridge Management System (BMS) 1992,
Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum.
3. Standar Spesification for Highway Bridges 1996, 1997 and 1998 interim Revisions oleh
American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials, Inc.(AASHTO).
4. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Spesification 2012.
5. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Spesification 2010.
6. Pembebanan untuk Jembatan, SNI 1725-2016, Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI).
7. Perencanaan Struktur Beton untuk Jembatan, SNI T-12-2004, Standar Nasional
Indonesia (SNI).
8. Pedoman Perencanaan Beban Gempa untuk Jembatan 2004.
9. Perancangan Jembatan Terhadap Beban Gempa SNI 03-2833-201X
10. Tata Cara Perhitungan Struktur Beton untuk Bangunan Gedung SNI 03-2847-2002.
1.2 Kriteria Desain

Tabel 1.1 Faktor Keamanan pada Struktur Penahan Tanah
Faktor Keamanan Minimum
Modus Keruntuhan
Struktur Penahanan Kondisi Statik Kondisi Gempa
Guling 2,00 1,25
Geser 1,50 1,10
Daya dukung 3,00 1,50
1,10
Stabilitas Global 1,50
1,30 Pada Oprit
a. Dalam perancangan struktur sudah harus mempertimbangkan deformasi jangka

panjang (consolidation settlement) 10 tahun
b. Penurunan ( settlement ) struktur di semua pondasi yang diijinkan adalah 10 cm
4
1.3 Spesifikasi Pembebanan
Tabel 1.2 Pembebanan pada model
Kelompok Aksi – Beban, Gaya Tekanan dan JangkaWaktu
No Aksi Tegangan Aksi – Aksi
1. Aksi dan Beban 1. Berat Sendiri. Tetap Tetap
Tetap 2. Beban Mati Tambahan. Tetap
3. Pengaruh Penyusutan dan
Rangkak.
4. Pengaruh Prategang. Tetap Tetap
5. Tekanan Tanah. Tetap
6. Beban Pelaksanaan
2. Beban Lalu Lintas 1. Beban Lajur “D”
Tetap Transient
2. Pembebanan Truck “T” Transient
3. Gaya Rem Transient
4. Gaya Sentrifugal Transient
5. Beban Trotoar Transient
3. Aksi Lingkungan 6.
1. Beban Tumbukan
Penurunan Transient
Transient
2. Pengaruh Temperatur Transient
3. Aliran Air dan Benda Transient
Hanyutan
4. Hidro / Daya Apung Transient
5. Beban Angin Transient
4. Aksi – Aksi Lainnya 6. Pengaruhpada

1.Gesekan Gempa
Perletakan Transient
Transient
2. Getaran Transient
3. Beban Pelaksanaan Transient
5
1.4 Data Umum
Lokasi pekerjaan berada pada kota Depok, Jawa Barat seperti terlihat pada gambar
berikut :
Gambar 1 Peta Lokasi Wilayah Pekerjaan
A2
P1
A1
2 PT = 2+063.685
063.685
2
050
305.47
LAJUR PERCEPATAN+TAPER
2 000
1 950
1 900
1 850
PC = 1+827.022
1 800
1 750
1 700
PERLAMBATAN
+ TAPER = 154.47
1 650
774.995 0
M
PT = 0+988.632
0 988.632
PC = 0+790.089
600
1
1
1

800 0
349.537
459.272
450
BK 2 

GAS
BK 1  0 950
AKSES 1
PT = 0+826.077
400
GAS
1
356.518
000
0+081.005
PT = 0+163.878
GAS
350
0
050
000
0
050
0
300
1 300
ST = 0+398.858
1 550
CS =
350
GAS
250
398.858
00
0
PC =
0
850
0
PC = 0+921.817
200
100
0
0
150
GAS
0+328.858
SC300
P1B
0
= 0+299.9
GAS
0
100 PC = 0+870.294
0 900
GAS
0
 350
91
1
SDN 01 LIMO
PT

GAS
= 0+891.595
0 
SS ST = 1+508.376
250
  ST = 0+881.148
GAS
=
0+247 0 LAJUR 1 500
 
P4
900 PERLAMBATAN+T
CS
GAS
.491 APER 382.50 

P2B
= 0+194.
PC
GAS
P3
1
= 0+910.559
115m
SC = 0+139.673
0
TS = 0+104.673
ON RAMP
991
GAS
0
150
DS-5- RAMP 0 125
0 850
1 1 300
P2
200
OFF
0
GAS
BRC
BRC
BK 1

BRC BRC
BK 1
0
ST = 9+656.558
872.379
BRC
GAS
BRC
BRC
BK 2
0
0
BK 1
0
BK 1
900
BRC
0
BRC BRC BRC

107.283
10
P1
10
BRC
CS = 1+445.876
BRC BRC
BRC
BK 1 1
BRC
PC = 0+942.550
BRC BK 1
0
10
BK 1
450
BRC
0
100
10
950
0
0
BRC
BRC
150
GAS
9
000
100 BK1
950
050
10
PC = 0+388.650
BK 2 BK 1 BK 1
100
BRC
BK 2
10
0 0 BK1 084.239 BK 1
9
BK 1
BRC
BK 1
PT = 10+451.747
200
PELAT INJ
SC = 10+719.981
10
BRC
PT = 0+956.627
BRC
BK 2
9
PELAT INJ
CS =
GAS
A1
0
BK 2
AK
BK 1
750
BK 1
800
10
0+806.148
9
AK
BK 2 BK 1
BRC
0 PC
550
700
250
450
10
850
BK 1 BK 1 1
9
BRC
BRC
BRC
PC = 10+148.544
10
0
BK 1 BK 2
600
BK 2
650
9
250
BK 2
GAS
BK 1
900
400
600
BK 2 BK 1
0+976.588
PT =
650
10
000
9
11
0
BRC
BRC
PELAT INJ
BK 2
0
600
BK 2 SC
700
350
PELAT INJ
9
BK 2
300
= 0+000000
BK 2 800
= 1+410.927
TS = 10+539.981
AK
0
950
750
10
GAS
10
9
AK
300
550
BRC
350
800
INJAK
10
050
0

JL PENDOWO
10
333'-4"
385.965
850
PELAT
10
11
0
INJAK
050
0
500
0
GAS
900
10
10
CS =
PELAT
250
0
0
BRC
10
10
950
DS-5-161 m
10
ST = 0+298.956
000
0
000
1
1
450
000
100
BK 2
PC = 0+057.264
GAS
400
050
050
050
11+016.219
050
150
000 1
INJAK
0
100
BK 2
PT = 0+092.614
11
050
400
050
0
100
000
0
0
PELAT
BK 2
INJAK
BRC
BK 1
100
BK 1
350
PC = 0+116.176
150
GAS
200
PELAT
6
200
300
7.642m
250
BK 1
PT =11
BK 1
= 0+228.95
150
BK 2
TS = 0+150.489
BK 2
SC
0
BK 1
0
GAS
200
0

0
BK 1 BK 2
150
BRC
0 1
200
BK 1
100
=
.668
BK 2
0
0
BK 2
0+153.490
BK 1 BK 2 BK 2 BK 1
89
PT
BK 2 BK 2
0+727
BK 2 BK 2 BK 1 GAS
BK 2 BK 2 750

= 0+202.9
0+208
BK 1
0
0
= 0+169.523
200
BK 1 BK 1 BK 1 BK 1
CS
BK 1

BK 1 GAS
.703
BK 1 BK 1 037.983
BK 1
0
1
200
000
150
=
11
000
PC == 0+018.527 
SC
BK 1 BK 1
PT 0+007.417 0
BK 1 GAS
ON BK 1 BK 1 K
0
BK 1 1 TINJA
220.791
PELA
0
SC
BK 1
250
TS
350
SC300
RAM
ST200
GAS
BK 1 BK 1
0 SS
0
250
= 0+652.703
000
0
050 1 = 1+323.
11
= 0+294.531
= 11+196.219
P 250 GAS
TS =
0
0
2
700
BK 1 BK 1 PC = 1+052.884
150 BK 2
300
.168 427 PELA

TINJA
K
150 GAS
0 OFF RAMP
200
1
0+215.781
ST
0+156 2
2
0
250
= BK
11
GAS
0
TS =
PT
= 0+595.356
SS
.668
1
100 0+103 1
0
BK
BK
350
GAS
= 0+078.016
650
350
0+430.352
2
150
BK
CS
BK 1 CS
AKSES 2
0
GAS
1
CS =PC
300
SC = 0+505.352
= 0+353.7 050
ST = 0+362.463
11
= 0+309.9
0
0
300
=
BK 1 GAS
CS
400
= 0+070
77
0+520.356
600
100
GAS
0
TS = 0+000
BK 2 = 1+096.162
0
= 0+000
PT100
350
0
63
0
11
1 100
300
GAS
0
1
SC
450
050
000
0
0
0
GAS
050
550
PT = 0+177.573
PC = 0+081.461
500
000
GAS
400
368.487
368.485
350
BK 2
11
0
400 0 GAS
BK 1 BK 2
1
BK 1
250 100 GAS
450
0
11
GAS
GAS
150 1 = 0+109.189
050
500
1
11
155.083 CS = PC
1 1+223.427 ST = 0+432.527
GAS
GAS
PELATINJAK
PELATINJAK
550
11
GAS
450 0
PT
1 200
0 GAS
=
PELATINJAK
150
0+168
600
PELATINJAK
MAKAM KMP KRUKUT

11
GAS
.383
GAS
1 000
650
11
GAS
SMP
GAS
0
700
11
200

GAS
500 0
150

PC
1
GAS
=
750

11
0 950
0+249
GAS

.597
0
GAS
800
11

250
PC
RA
GAS
PELAT
= 11+911.148
INJA

K
MP
PELAT
GAS
INJA

K
850
11
0
100
3
550

0
GAS
0
1
PELAT
800
INJA
K
GAS
PELAT
300
PT = 0+400.634
GAS
900
INJA
11
0
K
GAS
900 GAS
0
GAS
GAS
PC = 0+567.290 GAS
PELAT
850
GAS
46
GAS
INJAK
12
PELAT
950
GAS
= 1+029.0
GAS
INJAK
350
050
GAS
GAS
0
GAS
0 GAS
12
GAS
750
1
000
400
GAS
PELAT
SC
GAS
0
GAS
INJAK
PELAT
450
600 0 GAS
GAS
TS = 0+904.046
12
INJAK
GAS
000
PT = 12+237.920
GAS
500
050
GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
PC = 0+553.353
GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
550
GAS GAS
PT = 0+610.447 GAS
950
12
1
GAS
100
912.782GAS
12
GAS
900
0
GAS
850
GAS
150
12
0
GAS
800
PT = 0+584.727
12
0
GAS
PC = 0+921.869
750
200
GAS
0
12
K
PELATINJA
PERCEPATAN 0
700
K
768.785
PELATINJA
GAS
250
+ TAPER =
0
600
12
650
0
294.16 M GAS
0
300
GAS
600
650 0
12
0
GAS
350
550
12
950 0
0
GAS
500
400
GAS
250
12
200
PT = 0+955.900
450
GAS
450
300
PC = 0+798.795
150
12
GAS
PT = 0+259.063
0
400
800
PT = 0+494.880
0
500
P8
100
GAS
SC = 0+257.945
650
0
12
TS = 0+192.945
PC = 0+445.542
350
0
GAS
0
PC = 0+166.436
050
550
PC = 0+937.610
0
PT = 0+953.540
GAS
350
12
= 0+134.183
300
0
PT = 0+678.439
RAM
GAS
000
900
600
0
PC = 12+908.926
850
12
GAS
BK 2
JAK
250
INK
PC = 0+055.167
0
INTJA
GAS
933.479
RAM
650
PT =
0 800
LA
0
LAT
PEPE
950
= 0+647.639
650 GAS 0+826.282
200
0 PC
750
GAS
PT = 13+088.505
BK 1
700
12
BK 1
PC = 0+860.112
0
0
BK 1
150
950
0
12
700 GAS
700
0
0
100
GAS
750
KK
INJA
PT
= 0+947.242
TINTJA
400
12
0
GAS
050
000
LALA
000 1
KK
0
PEPE
INJA
800
P1
BK 1
TINTJA
GAS BK 1
PC = 0+967.190
000
BK 1
LALA
0
PEPE
12
GAS
0
PT = 0+985.495
0
13
GAS
0
850
KK
13
JAJA
13
13
GAS
13
13
0
1+003.7271
0
TIN
13
TIN
LALA
850
13
PE
PC
900
GAS
PE
GAS
= 0+848.866
13
PT
950
GAS
PELAT
PC = 13+259.683
GAS
1
PELAT
13
000
INJAK
000
PT = 1+036.309
050
GAS
100
150
200
250
INJAK
LAJUR PERLAMBATAN+TAPER
300
450
GAS
350
PC =
13
GAS
400
050 GAS
216.07 PC = 1+017.945
0
1 GAS
450
13
GAS
750 0 GAS
500
GAS
1
050 1
DS-7B-60m
13
GAS
GAS
550
GAS
050
GAS
900 0
13
769.615 0 PT = GAS
1+082.811 GAS
100
600
GAS
500 GAS
PT = 0+905.796
150
GAS
1
0
1
13
GAS PC = 0+913.904
650
080.163 1 GAS
200
GAS
209.641
1 GAS
100 GAS
1
105.108 GAS
700
13
GAS
GAS
GAS
04 GAS
GAS
750
GAS
13
= 0+530.7 GAS
950 PT = 0+952.689
0
550 GAS
CS
A1
0 GAS
GAS
GAS
PT
DS-5-440
800
GAS
13
= 13+806.30
GAS
m
 GAS
GAS

850
GAS
13
 
P1
GAS
1
GAS
  GAS
600 GAS
900
 000 1
13
0 GAS
BK 2
= 0+595.704

GAS
0
ST GAS
BK 1
GAS
950
000
GAS
14
BK 2
GAS
BK 1
0
P3
GAS
BK 1
GAS
050
000
GAS
BK 2
14
GAS BK 1
0
GAS BK 1
650
0 GAS 1
100
GAS
050
050
PC = 1+059.946 BK 1
14
GAS
0
P4
GAS
493.040
PC
GAS
150
= 0+660.058 GAS
PC
= 0+154.734
100
GAS
0
14
GAS
PT =GAS
= 0+493.040
200
1+086.882
OFF
0
GAS
RAMP
450
A2
GAS
150
PT
0
14
700
0 GAS
1
= 0+232.282
1 GAS
250
0
100
GAS
PT
GAS
200
400
HW
HW
14
GAS
8
7
= 0+418.82
HW
HW
350= 0+350.77
GAS
300
GAS HW
HW
0
HW
HW
GAS
250
GAS
14
PC
GAS
PT
= 0+291.407
350
GAS
GAS
750
0
0 GAS
300
1
14
150 GAS
300
GAS
400
PC
PC = GAS
0+760.058
PT = 1+157.141 GAS ON
RAMP
0
350
GAS
14
GAS
1
250
450
GAS
GAS

0
400
GAS
0
14

GAS
200
500
800 GAS

0 GAS
1 PT = 1+195.949
200 GAS STA:
0
450
 STA: 14+718.52

HW
0
GAS
14
0+129.66
150
GAS
BRC
( Main
550
HW

GAS
BRC
ELEV: Road
0
GAS STA:
RCP 68.967 ) STA: 14+900
0
500
 BOX
GAS
Ø 60
BRC
0+311.16

14
585.030
1 GAS
Cm CULVERT ( Main
100

BRC
225.772
 GAS BRC ELEV: Road
1.00

 GAS
m x 68.016 )

BRC
0.80
0
550
GAS
m
14
850 GAS
050
JL.KH

0
GAS

GAS


M USMAN
0
600
GAS
14

GAS
000


GAS

GAS

571.39
M
650
GAS
14
0

= 159.77
GAS
185.39

550
GAS
0
GAS

525
900
700
GAS
PERCEPATAN
0
0
MERGING
+ TAPER
GAS

500
500
14
GAS MR
15+000 NOSE
00
JL.PALAKALI RAYA

0+907.049 GAS RAMP


PC = ON-RAMP
475
475
750
GAS 0+411.4
X 700973.67
00
GAS Y 9295485.7 -2 KUKUSAN


PERLAMBATAN
450
18
14
GAS
0
339

GAS
LAJUR

425
800
GAS
0
DS-7c

GAS

400
14
945.486 GAS
0 STA: WISMA EMBUN PAGI
0
STA: 14+700 GAS


PT = 0+945.486 0+471.39

375
850
( Main GAS
0
Retaining
ELEV: Road GAS Wall

RCP 70.123 )
,P =
34.2
350
m
14

GAS
Ø 60 END
0
Cm GAS
OF

325
ON-RAMP
900
GAS

0
GAS
-2 KUKUSAN
300
GAS
1414

0
GAS
RAMP MR 15+150
275
950
GAS
950
0+562.430

X
Y = = 701113.15
0

GAS
250
GAS 9295427.6
15
0

0
GAS

50
225
GAS
000
0
GAS RWC
,P =

25m
200
GAS
15
0
Pagar
Panel
GAS
Panel
RWC
175
,P =
Pagar

10m
GRAHA PERMATA IBU GAS
050
0
65.05
GAS
150
DS-8

GAS

0
15
GAS
125
TAPER
GAS
0

STA:
100
GAS

STA: 14+900
100

GAS
0
BOX 0+271.38( Main GAS

15
075
CULVERT ELEV:Road GAS

0
)
150
GAS
1.00 68.005
050
GAS
mx
0
0.80
025
GAS
15
m
0
GAS
BATAS
000
GAS
200
0
PEKERJA GAS
GAS
AN
RIGID DIVERGIN GAS
GAS
MR
G NOSE
15+068.39 GAS
RAMP GAS
X= 0+102.948
1 OFF-RAM GAS
Y = 701024.75 P-2 GAS

9295428.0 0 KUKUSAN GAS
GAS
00 END GAS
MR OF OFF-RAM GAS
15+171.13
OFF GAS
X = RAMP P-2 GAS

KUKUSAN
Y = 701122.190+000 GAS
9295395.1 0 GAS
50
Gambar 2 Plan Jalan Tol Cinere Jagorawi Seksi III
1.5 Data Penyelidikan Tanah

Pekerjaan penyelidikan tanah dilakukan di rencana lokasi Jalan Tol Cinere Jagorawai
Seksi III sebanyak 21 titik bor dalam dan 10 titik sondir. Lalu juga dilakukan tes
laboratorium terhadap undisturbed sampel yang diambil dari lapangan. Muka air tanah
juga dicek saat pekerjaan bor dalam dan didapat rata-rata adalah -3 m.
6
Gambar 3 Denah Lokasi Soil Test
1-7
a. Hasil uji N-SPT lapangan
Nilai SPT pada masing-masing titik cukup bervareasi sehingga penyebaran kedalaman tanah keras pada masing-masing titik berbeda-
beda. Posisi tanah yan memiliki nilai SPT >60 yang paling dangkal pada kedalaman 5 meter dan paling dalam mencapai 20 meter
bahkan ada yang ditemukan pada kedalaman 12 meter. untuklebih jelas dapat dilihat pada gambar dibawah ini:
Gambar 4 Kondisi Nilai N-SPT (BH 01 – BH 10)
1-8
Gambar 5 Kondisi Nilai N-SPT (BH 11 – BH 21)
1-9
1-10
Gambar 6 Stratifikasi Tanah Tol Cijago Seksi III
1-11
b. Muka Air tanah
Muka Air Tanah (MAT) dapat diukur pada pekerjaan pengeboran diukur pada lubang
bor pada saat sebelum pengeboran (pagi hari) setelah recovery muka air tanah dan
setelah pengeboran (siang hari) MAT bercampur dengan air pemboran. Hasil
pengukuran MAT yang digunakan adalah setelah recovery diperoleh adalah sebagai
berikut:
Kedalaman
No X Y Titik
MAT (m)
1 695763 9296485 -6 BH 01
2 696428 9296441 0 BH 02
3 697165 9296450 -3.5 BH 03
4 698463 9296069 -2.4 BH 04
5 698890 9296017 -4.2 BH 05
6 699184 9295996 -2.1 BH 06
7 699309 9295996 -2.9 BH 07
8 699964 9295854 -0.7 BH 08
9 700127 9295792 -0.2 BH 09
10 700290 9295729 0 BH 10
11 695697 9296495 -3.5 BH 11
12 696769 9296471 -1.8 BH 12
13 698081 9296132 -2.75 BH 13
14 698531 9296081 -1.65 BH 14
15 699418 9295990 -6.15 BH 15
16 697858 9296585 -3 BH 16
17 697853 9296604 -3 BH 17
18 697838 9296444 -2.5 BH 18
19 697933 9296176 -2.8 BH 19
20 697769 9296240 -3.25 BH 20
21 697975 9295870 -3.25 BH 21
12
c. Parameter gempa
Dalam menentukan parameter gempa, peta gempa yang digunakan adalah Peta Sumber
dan Bahaya Gempabumi Indonesia Tahun 2017, dengan faktor amplifikasi dari SNI
2833-2016
PGA = 0.3 g
FPGA = 1.2 (Tanah sedang, SD)

Berdasarkan pertimbangan data referensi tersebut di atas, PGA peak ground acceleration
proyek pekerjaan Tol Cijago, direkomendasikan menggunakan nilai 0,4 – 0,5 g pada
batuan dasar. SNI 2833-2016 memerlukan faktor magnifikasi berdasarkan pada kondisi
tanah setempat. Untuk factor amplifikasi PGA untuk tanah sedang (SD) adalah 1.2.
13
2. BAB 2
Metode Analisis Penanganan Geoteknik Pada Rencana Tol CIJAGO Seksi III
Dalam analisis penanganan geoteknik Tol Cinere Jagorawi Seksi III, konsultan
menggunakan bantuan software PLAXIS 2D. Analisa dilakukan pada lokasi yang
memiliki ketinggian timbunan atau galian yang kritis. Sebelumnya, konsultan membuat
stratifikasi tanah berdasarkan data tanah yang ada. Kemudian dilakukan interpretasi data
tanah untuk input parameter tanah ke dalam software. Output yang didapat antara lain
dispsettlementlacement yang terjadi pada saat operasi, settlement akibat konsolidasi dan
safety factor pada kondisi statik dan gempa.
Berikut adalah tahapan dalam perencanaan struktur dinding penahan tanah, khsusunya
dengan software PLAXIS 2D.
1. Membuat stratifikasi tanah berdasarkan data soil test yang telah dilakukan.
2. Membuat resume properti tanah, yang akan digunakan untuk input pada software.
Data properti tanah ini ada yang didapatkan dari pengujian lab dan juga interpretasi
dari data yang ada. Berikut adalah contoh pengambilan nilai properti tanah.
Contoh Tabel Penentuan Nilai Properti Tanah
Mat -3 Tipe Kedalaman (m) N-SPT γd (kN/m3) γsat (kN/m3) E (kPa) ν c (kPa) φ (o) k (m/s)
BH-10 Lapis Perkerasan 0- 1 18 20 50000 0.3 1 35 10-4
Clay - Soft 1- 7 4 12 17 8000 0.35 3 15 10-6
Silt - Medium 7- 10 8 10.2 16.2 16000 0.33 3 16.2 10-6
Silt - Very Stiff 10 - 13 25 12.5 17.5 50000 0.3 25 21 10-6
Clay/Silt - Hard 13 - 30 53 12.9 17.4 106000 0.3 53 22.5 10-6
Keterangan
- Properti tanah di atas berdasarkan data BH-… dan telah disesuaikan dengan stratifikasi
tanah.
- Muka air tanah berdasarkan data di lapangan
- Nilai N-SPT berdasarkan hasil pengujian lapangan.
- Nilai γd dan γsat berdasarkan hasil uji laboratorium.
- Nilai Modulus Elastisitas (E) didapatkan berdasarkan korelasi sebagai berikut:
14
- Nilai poisson ration (υ) didapatkan berdasarkan tipe tanah, yaitu sebagai berikut.
- Nilai kohesi (c) dan sudut geser (ϕ) berdasarkan data uji kuat geser tanah, yaitu Triaksial
CU untuk tanah kohesif dan Direct Shear untuk tanah non-kohesif. Parameter kuat geser
yang dilakukan untuk analisa adalah drained analysis, menggunakan parameter efektif
tanah, untuk mensimulasi kondisi terburuk dari kasus galian (Unloading Case)
- Nilai koefisien permeabilitas diambil berdasarkan tipe tanah, dengan referensi sebagai
berikut.
15
3. Menggambarkan atau memodelkan geometri underpass pada PLAXIS untuk setiap
perbedaan galian. Permodelan underpass diperlihatkan pada gambar di bawah ini.
ROW
ROW
12+725
70
RAMP 5 KRUKUT JUNCTION 0.5
1
0+206.462
WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm
65
BETON KELAS C
71.103
65.597
DS-7B
Gambar 7 Permodelan galian pada PLAXIS 2D
4. Input data atau parameter dalam PLAXIS.

Ada beberapa elemen yang harus diinput datanya, antara lain
1. Soil and properties
2. Plates : Bor pile, pelat
3. Beban kendaraan (9 kN/m2) dan beban tambahan
4. Kondisi mat awal
16
Input Soil Properties
Input Plate Properties
17
Define Muka Air Tanah Awal
5. Analisa Staged Construction
Staged Construction
18
6. Cek output dari PLAXIS, seperti displacement dan safety factor pada model
Gambar 8 Ouput Hasil Running PLAXIS 2D
Gambar 9 Ouput Safety factor
19
3. BAB 3
ANALISIS TOL CIJAGO SEKSI IIIA
3.1. Main Road
a. STA 12+725
ROW
ROW
12+725
70
1
0+206.462
WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm
65
BETON KELAS C
71.103
65.597
DS-7B
Gambar 10 Cross section STA 12+725
Data parameter tanah:

BH 05 (MAT -4.2 m)
2
No Lapisan Kedalaman (m) N-SPT γunsat (kN/m3) γsat (kN/m3) E (kN/m ) ν c (kN/m2) φ (°)
1 Silty clay soft 1- 8 5- 7 10.23 15.64 3900 0.3 31.3 6.029
2 Silty clay medium 8 - 11 11 11.38 16.42 5100 0.3 68.4 5.95
3 Sandy silt 11 - 16.5 60 18 20 19800 0.3 2 30
4 Gravelly sand 16.5 - 24 60 15.42 18.89 79200 0.3 58 41
5 Sand 24 - 30 60 18 20 37500 0.3 1 37
Model input plaxis:
Gambar 11 Pemodelan cross section STA 12+725
20
Gambar 12 Output Displacemen STA 17+725
SF kondisi statis:
SF kondisi gempa
21
b. STA 12+775
ROW
ROW
12+725
70
1
0+206.462
WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm
65
BETON KELAS C
71.103
65.597
DS-7B

BH 05 (MAT -4.2 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 1- 8 5- 7 10.23 15.64 3900 0.3 31.3 6.029
2 Silty clay medium 8 - 11 11 11.38 16.42 5100 0.3 68.4 5.95
3 Sandy silt 11 - 16.5 60 18 20 19800 0.3 2 30
4 Gravelly sand 16.5 - 24 60 15.42 18.89 79200 0.3 58 41
5 Sand 24 - 30 60 18 20 37500 0.3 1 37
Model input plaxis:
22
Gambar 15 Output plaxis pemodelan STA 12+775 (Displacement maks 74.17 mm)
Gambar 16 Output safety factor statis STA 12+775 (SF = 2.817)
Output safety factor gempa STA 12+775 (SF = 2.0849)
23
c. STA 13+350
ROW 13+350 ROW
DED DED
70 70
65 65
60 60
69.347
59.688
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50

BH 07 (MAT -2.9 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 1- 4 4 9.94 18.68 3000 0.3 25 5.638
2 Silty clay medium 4- 6 18 14 16 7200 0.3 15 25
3 Sandy silt 6 - 12 60 17 19 21000 0.3 5 30
4 Gravelly sand 12 - 30 60 15 18 79200 0.3 58 41
24
Gambar 20 Output plaxis pemodelan STA 13+350 konsolidasi 10 tahun (Displacement maks
143.64 mm)
Gambar 21 Output safety factor STA 13+350 (SF = 1.56)
Output safety factor gempa STA 13+350 (SF = 1.31)
25
d. STA 13+375
JALAN LOKAL KRAMAT

13+375 1+031.311
ROW
59.554
63.379
61.547
69.497
61.213
64.219
Gambar 22 Kondisi cross section STA 13+375

BH 07 (MAT -2.9 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 1- 4 4 9.94 18.68 3000 0.3 25 5.638
2 Silty clay medium 4- 6 18 14 16 7200 0.3 15 25
3 Sandy silt 6 - 12 60 17 19 21000 0.3 5 30
4 Gravelly sand 12 - 30 60 15 18 79200 0.3 58 41
Analisis retaining wall (kanan)
Gambar 23 Pemodelan plaxis STA 13+375
26
77.07 mm)
27
Gambar 26 Output safety factor statis STA 13+375 (SF = 1.507)
Gambar 27 Output safety factor gempa STA 13+375 (SF = 1.494)
Analisis retaining wall (kanan)
SUMMARY
0
0 1 2 3
Static Overturning
(FS)T 2.8 > 2
Design is OK with respect to overturning
Static Sliding
(FS)SLIDING 1.82 > 1.5
Design is OK with respect to sliding
Static Bearing Capacity

(FS)B 3.6 > 3
Design is OK with respect to bearing capacity
Static Eccentricity
Eccentricity e 0.18 m < B/6 = 0.42 m
Design is OK with respect to eccentricity
REINFORCEMENT
Wall Main reinforcement D19 - 200
Horizontal reinforcement D16 - 200
Shear reinforcement D13 - 400
Footing Main reinforcement D19 - 200
28
e. STA 14+100
OFF RAMP 1 KUKUSAN
ROW 0+109.593 14+100 ROW
DED DED
70 70
GEOTEXTILE
65 65
71.197
71.536
62.375
62.59
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40

BH 09 (MAT -0.2 m)
2
1 Silty clay very soft 1- 4 1- 2 9.17 14.95 2100 0.35 8.3 4.946
2 Silty clay soft 4 - 7.5 4 10.03 15.5 3000 0.35 24.8 6.059
3 Sandy silt 7.5 - 15 60 15.47 18.96 19800 0.3 10 32
4 Gravelly sand 15 - 30 60 18 20 79200 0.3 58 41
29
708.08 mm)
30
Gambar 32 Output safety factor statik STA 14+100 (SF = 1.674)
31
f. STA 14+550
OFF RAMP 1 KUKUSAN ON RAMP 1 KUKUSAN
0+559.654 14+550 0+038.464
75 75
70 70
WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm

2% 2%
65
71.883
73.126
69.807
67.267
72.215
73.082
70
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
14+575
Gambar 34. Cross Section STA 14+550

Data parameter tanah
BH 10 (MAT -0 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 1- 3 2 9.69 15.33 2400 0.3 12.9 5.548
2 Sandy silt 3- 7 60 14.73 18.6 19800 0.3 5 30
3 Silty clay medium 7 - 15 31 - 37 13.71 18.19 12300 0.3 15 25
4 Gravelly sand 15 - 30 60 15 18 79200 0.3 58 41
INPUT DATA
Standard used:
1. Perancangan Jembatan Terhadap Beban Gempa SNI 03-2833-2016
2. Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung SNI 03-2847-2019.
3. Persyaratan Perancangan Geoteknik SNI 8460-2017
Soil data (Backfill)

Unit weight, g 18 kN/m3
f' 30 o
c 5 kN/m2
Soil data (Foundation)

Unit weight, g' 18 kN/m3
f'p 30 o
c 5 kN/m2
o
Concrete-soil interaction angle of friction, δb 20
Material
Concrete fc' = 30 MPa
gconcrete = 25 kN/m3
Steel (Ø < 10 mm) fy = 240 MPa
(D >= 10 mm) fy = 420 Mpa
Seismic Parameter
PGA = 0.3 g
F = 1.2
FPGA = 0.36 g
kh = 0.12 g
kv = 0.04 g
FACTOR OF SAFETY
Mode of failure Static Seismic
Overturning = 2 1.25
Sliding = 1.5 1.1
Bearing capacity = 3 1.5
32
Cantilever Wall Diagram
8
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
-1
Wall data
Wall friction, d = 0
Wall height, Ho = 4.5 m
Footing thickness,tf = 0.75 m
Front wall width, B 2 = 0
Thickness of wall at top of wall, B 3 = 0.3 m
Back wall width, B 4 = 0.2
Stem thickness = 0.5 m
Footing toe to wall front face, B 1 = 3 m
Footing toe to wall back face, B4 = 1 m
Footing base width, B = 4.5 m
Depth of soil in front of wall (to top of footing), Hs = 1 m
Slope of backfill, b = 30
Depth of shear key, ts = 0.6 m
Width of shear key = 0.5 m
Distance shear key from toe, Ds = 3 m
External Load (Surcharge)

Uniform load = 0 kPa
External Load on stem
Line load on top of stem = 0 kN/m
Horizontal distance of line load to toe = 0 m
GEOMETRIC DATA
Height H = 6.24 m
Distance: back face to toe = 3.50 m
Distance: back face to heel = 1.00 m
Height from top of base to top of wall = 5.49 m
Weights =
Weight of soil (block 1) = 109.7 kN/m
Centroid of soil mass to toe = 3.18 m
Weight of surcharge = 0.0 kN/m
Weight of entire soil block and surcharge = 160.7 kN/m
Centroid distance of surcharge to toe = 3.88 m
33
s, Distance; back footing to soil mass = 0.62 m
Weight of stem = 54.9 kN/m
Weight of base = 91.9 kN/m
Weight of Concrete = 146.8 kN/m
Centroid of stem to toe = 3.20 m
Centrod of base to toe = 2.25 m
Weight of wall + weight of soil+surcharge+strip load = 307.5 kN/m
Weight of wall + weight of soil+surcharge+strip load +PaV = 362.7 kN/m
Resisting moment about toe = 1141.7 kN.m
Disturbing moment about toe = 198.7 kN.m
Resultant moment = 943.0 kN.m
Centroid from toe (static) = 2.60 m
Static Active Earth Pressure

KA = 0.333 (Rankine)
Backfill
PA = 110.3 kN/m
PA,V = 55.2 kN/m
PA,H = 95.5 kN/m
Surcharge
Fx = 0.0 kN/m
Fy = 0.0 kN/m
Moment arm- backfill + surcharge
dA = 2.08 m
Static Passive Earth Pressure

KP,R = 3.000
PP,R = 46.5 kN/m
dP = 0.18 m
Static Resultant Forces (w/ W soil, W wall, W f ooting, PA, and P P)

Rx 95.5 kN/m
Ry 362.7 kN/m
R 375.0 kN/m
d (CCW from horizontal) 75.24 °
Seismic Active Earth Pressure

KAE = 0.708 (Coulomb)
Backfill
PAE = 234.4 kN/m
PAE,V = 117.2 kN/m
PAE,H = 203.0 kN/m
Surcharge
Fx = 0.0 kN/m
Fy = 0.0 kN/m
dA = 2.08 m
Seismic disturbing moment about toe = 422.3 kN.m
Weight of wall + weight of soil+surcharge+strip load +P AE,V = 424.7 kN/m
Seismic Resultant Forces (w/ W soil, W wall, W f ooting, PA, and P P)
Rx (no passive resistance) 203.0 kN/m
34
Ry 424.7 kN/m
R 470.8 kN/m
Bearing capacity:
a e(3*π / 4 - φ/2)*tan φ = 3.351
Nq = 13.403
Ng = 16.1
Nc = 37.162
smax = 118.2 kPa
smin = 43.0 kPa
Qu (Terzaghi) = 1199 kPa
Seismic
smax, AE = 138.4 kPa
smin, AE = 50.3 kPa
REINFORCEMENT DESIGN
Factor
Dead load 1.2
Live load 1.6
WALL REINFORCEMENT
Main reinforcement = 22 mm
Horizontal reinforcement = 16 mm
Shear reinforcement = 13 mm
Teg. Leleh tul utama fy = 420 MPa

Teg. Leleh tul pembag fyv = 420 MPa
Main reinforcement
Mu Maximum factored moment
= 102.59 kNm/m
tf Thickness of wall = 0.500 m

c Concrete cover = 75 mm
Drebar Rebar diameter designed = 22.000 mm
df Footing effective depth
df = tf - c - 0.5 * Drebar = = 0.414 m
β1 Block stress depth factor 0.85
35
Ru Coefficient of resistance φ = 0.9
Ru =Mu/( φ*width * df 2 ) = 102.59/(0.9 x 1 x 0.41^2)
= 0.665 Mpa
m m = fy / (0.85 * fc') = 420 / (0.85 x 30)
= 16.471
ρcalc Required reinforcement ratio
ρcalc = (1/m) * [1 - √(1 - 2m * Ru / fy)] = 0.160 %
ρb Balanced reinforcement ratio
ρb = ( β1 * 0.85 * fc' / fy) * (600 / (600 + fy)) = 3.036 %
ρmax Maximum reinforcement ratio
ρmax = 0.75 * ρb = 2.277 %
ρmin Minimum reinforcement ratio
ρmin1 = 0.25*((fc')^0.5) / fy = 0.326 %
ρmin2 = 1.4 / fy = 0.333 %
ρmin3 = (0.2% for fy < 420 Mpa) = 0.200 %
ρmin = max(ρmin1;ρmin2; ρmin3) = 0.333 %
ρ req Largest value between ρmin and ρcalc = 0.333 %
As req Total area of rebar required
As req = ρreq * width * df = 1380.00 mm2
s max = = 450 mm
3h = 1500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min = = 25 mm
db = 22 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use s min = 33.33 mm
use D22- 200 mm OK
As = 1900.66 mm2 > As req (OK)
Horizontal reinforcement
As min = 0.0018*b*h = 900.00 mm2
s max = 450 mm
5h = 2500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min 40 mm
1.5 db = 24 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D16- 200 mm OK
As = 1005.31 mm2 > As req (OK)
Shear Reinforcement
Vu Ultimate shear load
= 68.5443 kN
φ 0.75
36
Vu/φ Requested nominal shear = 91.39 kN
Vc Concrete shear capacity = 387.97 kN
Vs Needed steel shear capacity = 0.00 kN
D Rebar diameter = 13 mm
Av Shear rebar area = - mm2
s Shear reinforcement spacing = - mm
Minimum spacing,
16db = - mm
48ds = - mm
0.5d = - mm
smaller b or h = 0 mm
used reinforcement D13- 400 mm OK
FOOTING REINFORCEMENT
Factored load
Concrete 176.13 kN
Soil block 1 131.7 kN
Surcharge 0 kN
ΣW = 369.01 kN
qmax 43.72 kN/m2
qmin 120.28 kN/m2
surcharge = 0 kN/m2
soil weight = 9 kN/m2
120.2
103
43.72 94.76
Data :
Yield strength main reinforcement fy = 420 MPa

Yield strength horizontal reinforcement fyv = 420 MPa
Main reinforcement
front leg = 172.06 kNm/m
back leg = -0.26 kNm/m
37
tf Thickness of footing = 0.750 m
Drebar Rebar diameter designed = 22 mm
df = tf - c - 0.5 * Drebar = = 0.664 m
Ru Coefficient of resistance
Ru =Mu/( φ*width * df 2 ) =
172.06/(0.9 x 1 x 0.66^2) = 0.434 Mpa
m m = fy / (0.85 * fc')=
420 / (0.85 x 30) = 16.471
ρcalc = (1/m) * [1 - √(1 - 2m * Ru / fy)] = 0.104 %
ρb = ( β1 * 0.85 * fc' / fy) * (600 / (600 + fy)) = 3.036 %
ρmax = 0.75 * ρb = 2.277 %
ρmin1 = 0.25*((fc')^0.5) / fy = 0.326 %
ρmin2 = 1.4 / fy = 0.333 %
ρmin3 = 0.2% for fy < 420 Mpa = 0.200 %
ρmin = maks(ρmin1;ρmin2; ρmin3) = 0.333 %
s max = = 450 mm
3h = 2250 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min = = 25 mm
db = 22 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D22- 150 mm OK
As = 2534.22 mm2 > As req (OK)
As min = 0.0018*b*h = 1350.00 mm2
s max = 450 mm
5h = 3750 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min 25 mm
1.5 db = 24 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D16- 200 mm (OK)
As = 1005.31 mm2 > As req (OK)
38
Shear Reinforcement
front leg = 216.78 kN
back leg = 2.32 kN
φ 0.75
use
minimum
Vs Needed steel shear capacity = 0.00 kN rebar
Minimum spacing, s
16db = - mm
48ds = - mm
0.5d = - mm
smaller b or h = - mm
Used spacing = 0 mm
Reference
Muni Budhu (1) "Soil Mechanics and Foundations" and (2) "Foundation and Earth Retaining
Structures", John Wiley & Sons, NY, 2007
Overturning
Static: (FS)T 5.7 > 2 (OK)
Seismic: (FS)T,AE 2.7 > 1.25 (OK)
Sliding
Static: (FS)SLIDING 2.10 > 1.5 (OK)
Seismic: (FS)SLIDING, AE 1.10 > 1.1 (OK)

Static: (FS)B 10.1 > 3 (OK)
Seismic: (FS)B, AE 8.7 > 1.5 (OK)
Static Eccentricity
Eccentricity e -0.35 m < B/6 = 0.75 m
REINFORCEMENT
39
3.2. Ramp 2 Krukut Junction
a. STA 0+325
0+325
75
69.646
ROW
68.158
70
68.771
72.779
65
Gambar 35 Cross section RAMP 2 STA 0+275
Data parameter tanah

BH 03 (MAT -3.5 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 0- 4 4 11.48 16.51 3000 0.3 68.19 6.049
2 Silty clay medium 4- 8 11 - 15 14 18.39 6300 0.3 15 24
3 Sandy silt 8 - 15 60 18 20 19800 0.3 2 30
4 Gravelly sand 15 - 30 60 15.35 18.85 79200 0.3 58 41
Gambar 36 Pemodelan plaxis RAMP 2 STA 0+325
40
Gambar 37 Output plaxis pemodelan RAMP 2 STA 0+325 (Displacement maks 89.21 mm)
Gambar 38 Output safety factor statik RAMP 2 STA 0+325 sebesar 1,660
Gambar 39 Output safety factor gempa RAMP 2 STA 0+325 sebesar 1,291
41
INPUT DATA
Standard used:

f' 28 o
c 5 kN/m2

f'p 6.05 o
c 68.19 kN/m2
o
Concrete-soil interaction angle of friction, δb 4
Material
(D >= 10 mm) fy = 420 Mpa
Seismic Parameter
PGA = 0.3 g
F = 1.2
FPGA = 0.36 g
kh = 0.12 g
kv = 0.04 g
FACTOR OF SAFETY
Sliding = 1.5 1.1
42
5
0
0 1 2 3
Wall data
Wall friction, d = 0
Footing toe to wall front face, B 1 = 0.5 m
Footing base width, B = 2 m
Depth of soil in front of wall (to top of footing), Hs = 0 m
Slope of backfill, b = 30
Depth of shear key, ts = 0 m
Width of shear key = 0 m

GEOMETRIC DATA
Height H = 3.50 m
Height from top of base to top of wall = 3 m
Weights =
43
Centrod of base to toe = 1 m

Backfill
PA = 90.2 kN/m
PA,V = 45.1 kN/m
PA,H = 78.1 kN/m
Surcharge
Fx = 0.0 kN/m
Fy = 0.0 kN/m
dA = 1.17 m

KP,R = 1.236
PP,R = 2.6 kN/m
dP = 0.17 m

Rx 78.1 kN/m
Ry 163.3 kN/m
R 181.0 kN/m

KAE = 0.708 (Rankine)
Backfill
PAE = 73.8 kN/m
PAE,V = 36.9 kN/m
PAE,H = 63.9 kN/m
Surcharge
Fx = 0.0 kN/m
Fy = 0.0 kN/m
dA = 1.17 m
44
Ry 155.0 kN/m
R 167.7 kN/m
Bearing capacity:
a e(3*π / 4 - φ/2)*tan φ = 1.277
Nq = 2.854
Ng = 0.3
Nc = 7.751
smax = 119.9 kPa
smin = 43.4 kPa
Seismic
smax, AE = 113.8 kPa
smin, AE = 41.2 kPa
Factor
Dead load 1.2
Live load 1.6
WALL REINFORCEMENT

Main reinforcement
= 79.50 kNm/m

df = tf - c - 0.5 * Drebar = = 0.416 m
45
Ru =Mu/( φ*width * df 2 ) = 79.5/(0.9 x 1 x 0.42^2)
= 0.512 Mpa
m m = fy / (0.85 * fc') = 420 / (0.85 x 30)
= 16.471
ρcalc = (1/m) * [1 - √(1 - 2m * Ru / fy)] = 0.123 %
ρb = ( β1 * 0.85 * fc' / fy) * (600 / (600 + fy)) = 3.036 %
ρmax = 0.75 * ρb = 2.277 %
ρmin1 = 0.25*((fc')^0.5) / fy = 0.326 %
ρmin2 = 1.4 / fy = 0.333 %
ρmin3 = (0.2% for fy < 420 Mpa) = 0.200 %
s max = = 450 mm
3h = 1500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min = = 25 mm
db = 19 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D19- 200 mm OK
As = 1417.64 mm2 > As req (OK)
As min = 0.0018*b*h = 900.00 mm2
s max = 450 mm
5h = 2500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min 40 mm
1.5 db = 24 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D16- 200 mm OK
As = 1005.31 mm2 > As req (OK)
Shear Reinforcement
= 79.5011 kN
φ 0.75
46
Minimum spacing,
16db = - mm
48ds = - mm
0.5d = - mm
Factored load
Concrete 66 kN
Soil block 2 0 kN
Surcharge 0 kN
ΣW = 141.80 kN
qmax 104.12 kN/m2
qmin 37.68 kN/m2
surcharge = 0 kN/m2
37.68
70.
104.12 87.51
Data :

Main reinforcement
back leg = 13.72 kNm/m
47
df = tf - c - 0.5 * Drebar = = 0.416 m
10.45/(0.9 x 1 x 0.42^2) = 0.088 Mpa
m m = fy / (0.85 * fc')=
420 / (0.85 x 30) = 16.471
ρcalc = (1/m) * [1 - √(1 - 2m * Ru / fy)] = 0.021 %
ρb = ( β1 * 0.85 * fc' / fy) * (600 / (600 + fy)) = 3.036 %
ρmax = 0.75 * ρb = 2.277 %
ρmin1 = 0.25*((fc')^0.5) / fy = 0.326 %
ρmin2 = 1.4 / fy = 0.333 %
ρmin3 = 0.2% for fy < 420 Mpa = 0.200 %
s max = = 450 mm
3h = 1500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min = = 25 mm
db = 19 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D19- 200 mm OK
As = 1417.64 mm2 > As req (OK)
As min = 0.0018*b*h = 900.00 mm2
s max = 450 mm
5h = 2500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min 25 mm
1.5 db = 24 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
As = 1005.31 mm2 > As req (OK)
48
Shear Reinforcement
back leg = 21.91 kN
φ 0.75
use
minimum
Minimum spacing, s
16db = - mm
48ds = - mm
0.5d = - mm
Used spacing = 0 mm
Reference
Overturning
Sliding

Static Eccentricity
Eccentricity e 0.16 m < B/6 = 0.33 m
REINFORCEMENT
49
3.3. Ramp 5
a. STA 1+375
1+375 JU DESARI
RAMP 2 (sta. 0+760.14)
75
70
66.341
74.960
65.501
78.929
65
Gambar 40 Cross section RAMP 5 STA 1+375

BH 20 (MAT -0 m)
2
1 Clay 1- 3 2 17 19 2400 0.3 20 28
2 Silty clay medium 3 - 20.5 3 - 14 14 16 4800 0.3 14 25
3 Silty sand 20.5 - 30 60 18 20 37500 0.3 5 30
Gambar 41 Pemodelan plaxis RAMP 5 STA 1+375
50
Gambar 43Output plaxis pemodelan RAMP 5 STA 1+375 konsolidasi 10 tahun (Displacement
maks 106.2 mm)
51
Gambar 44 Output safety factor statik RAMP 5 STA 1+375 sebesar 1,91
Gambar 45 Output safety factor gempa RAMP 5 STA 1+375 sebesar 1,20
52
3.4. OP Tanah Baru + Jalan Lokal
0+925
ROW
72.271
77.422
Gambar 46 Cross section OP Tanah Baru STA 0+925

BH 08 (MAT -0.7 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 1- 6 1- 8 10.36 15.76 4200 0.3 31.4 5.728
2 Sandy silt 6 - 15 60 14.82 18.52 19800 0.3 5 30
3 Gravelly sand 15 - 30 60 15.66 19.07 79200 0.3 59 41.1
Gambar 47 Pemodelan plaxis OP Tanah baru STA 0+925
53
Gambar 49 Output safety factor statik OP Tanah Baru STA 0+925 sebesar 1,559
Gambar 50 Output safety factor gempa OP Tanah Baru STA 0+925 sebesar 1,245
54
INPUT DATA
Standard used:

f' 30 o
c 0 kN/m2

f' 5.78 o
c 31.4 kN/m2
Concrete-soil interaction angle of friction, δb 4 o
Material
(D >= 10 mm) fy = 420 Mpa
Seismic Parameter
PGA = 0.3 g
F = 1.2
FPGA = 0.36 g
kh = 0.12 g
kv = 0.04 g
FACTOR OF SAFETY
Sliding = 1.5 1.1
55
5
0
0 1 2 3
Wall data
Wall friction, d = 0 °
Footing toe to wall front face, B 1 = 0.5 m
Footing base width, B = 2 m
Depth of soil in front of wall (to top of footing), Hs = 0.5 m
Slope of backfill, b = 45 °
Depth of shear key, ts = 0 m
Width of shear key = 0 m

GEOMETRIC DATA
Height H = 3.50 m
Height from top of base to top of wall = 3 m
Weights =
56
Centrod of base to toe = 1 m

Backfill
PA = 32.7 kN/m
PA,V = 23.1 kN/m
PA,H = 23.1 kN/m
Surcharge
Fx = 0.0 kN/m
Fy = 0.0 kN/m
dA = 1.17 m

KP,R = 1.224
PP,R = 2.4 kN/m
dP = 0.33 m

Rx 23.1 kN/m
Ry 146.4 kN/m
R 148.2 kN/m

KAE = 0.708 (Rankine)
Backfill
PAE = 69.4 kN/m
PAE,V = 49.1 kN/m
PAE,H = 49.1 kN/m
Surcharge
Fx = 0.0 kN/m
Fy = 0.0 kN/m
dA = 1.17 m
57
Ry 172.4 kN/m
R 179.3 kN/m
Bearing capacity:
a e(3*π / 4 - φ/2)*tan φ = 1.263
Nq = 2.809
Ng = 0.3
Nc = 7.641
s max = 95.5 kPa
s min = 50.9 kPa
Seismic
s max, AE = 112.5 kPa
s min, AE = 59.9 kPa
Factor
Dead load 1.2
Live load 1.6
WALL REINFORCEMENT

Main reinforcement
= 16.67 kNm/m

df = tf - c - 0.5 * Drebar = = 0.416 m
58
Ru =Mu/( φ*width * df 2 ) = 16.67/(0.9 x 1 x 0.42^2)
= 0.107 Mpa
m m = fy / (0.85 * fc') = 420 / (0.85 x 30)
= 16.471
ρcalc = (1/m) * [1 - √(1 - 2m * Ru / fy)] = 0.026 %
ρb = ( β1 * 0.85 * fc' / fy) * (600 / (600 + fy)) = 3.036 %
ρmax = 0.75 * ρb = 2.277 %
ρmin1 = 0.25*((fc')^0.5) / fy = 0.326 %
ρmin2 = 1.4 / fy = 0.333 %
ρmin3 = (0.2% for fy < 420 Mpa) = 0.200 %
s max = = 450 mm
3h = 1500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min = = 25 mm
db = 19 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D19- 200 mm OK
As = 1417.64 mm2 > As req (OK)
As min = 0.0018*b*h = 900.00 mm2
s max = 450 mm
5h = 2500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min 40 mm
1.5 db = 24 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D16- 200 mm OK
As = 1005.31 mm2 > As req (OK)
Shear Reinforcement
= 20.0000 kN
59
φ 0.75
Minimum spacing,
16db = - mm
48ds = - mm
0.5d = - mm
Factored load
Concrete 66 kN
Soil block 2 4.8 kN
Surcharge 0 kN
ΣW = 147.98 kN
qmax 51.45 kN/m2
qmin 96.53 kN/m2
surcharge = 0 kN/m2
96.53
73.
51.45 62.72
Data :

Main reinforcement
back leg = -13.01 kNm/m
60
df = tf - c - 0.5 * Drebar = = 0.416 m
5.03/(0.9 x 1 x 0.42^2) = 0.032 Mpa
m m = fy / (0.85 * fc')=
420 / (0.85 x 30) = 16.471
ρcalc = (1/m) * [1 - √(1 - 2m * Ru / fy)] = 0.008 %
ρb = ( β1 * 0.85 * fc' / fy) * (600 / (600 + fy)) = 3.036 %
ρmax = 0.75 * ρb = 2.277 %
ρmin1 = 0.25*((fc')^0.5) / fy = 0.326 %
ρmin2 = 1.4 / fy = 0.333 %
ρmin3 = 0.2% for fy < 420 Mpa = 0.200 %
s max = = 450 mm
3h = 1500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min = = 25 mm
db = 19 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
use D19- 200 mm OK
As = 1417.64 mm2 > As req (OK)
As min = 0.0018*b*h = 900.00 mm2
s max = 450 mm
5h = 2500 mm
use s max = 450 mm
s min 25 mm
1.5 db = 24 mm
4/3 dagg = 33.33 mm
61
As = 1005.31 mm2 > As req (OK)
Shear Reinforcement
back leg = -22.26 kN
φ 0.75
use
minimum
Minimum spacing, s
16db = - mm
48ds = - mm
0.5d = - mm
Used spacing = 0 mm
Reference
Overturning
Sliding

Static Eccentricity
Eccentricity e -0.10 m < B/6 = 0.33 m
REINFORCEMENT
62
4. BAB 4
ANALISIS TOL CIJAGO SEKSI III B
4.1.Main Road
a. STA 9+314
9+314.91
70 ROW
ROW
65
0.5
0.5
60
0.5
1
0.5
1
WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm
WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm
55
66.127
55.622
Gambar 51 Cross Section STA 9+314

BH 01 (MAT -6 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 0- 4 6 10.34 15.57 3600 0.3 37 5.9
2 Silty clay medium 4- 8 11 - 20 14.74 18.38 7200 0.3 15 24
3 Clayey silt 8 - 15 60 18 20 60000 0.3 5 28
4 Sandy silt 15 - 20 60 18 20 60000 0.3 2 30
5 Gravelly sand 20 - 30 60 15.66 18.78 79200 0.3 55 41
63
Gambar 54 Output safety factor statik STA 9+314 sebesar 1,930
Gambar 55 Output safety factor gempa STA 9+314 sebesar 1,4919
64
b. STA 9+500
9+500
55
ROW
50
ROW
45
43.741
51.519

BH 01 (MAT -6 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 0- 4 6 10.34 15.57 3600 0.3 37 5.9
3 Clayey silt 8 - 15 60 18 20 60000 0.3 5 28
4 Sandy silt 15 - 20 60 18 20 60000 0.3 2 30
5 Gravelly sand 20 - 30 60 15.66 18.78 79200 0.3 55 41
65
Gambar 59Output plaxis pemodelan STA 9+500 konsolidasi 10 tahun (Displacement maks
58.98 mm)
66
Gambar 60 Output safety factor statik STA 9+500 sebesar 1,501
Gambar 61 Output safety factor gempa STA 9+500 sebesar 1,612
67
c. STA 10+025
ROW
10+025
65
60
55
68.247
53.129
50

BH 02 (MAT -0 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 0- 6 4- 5 10.13 15.61 3300 0.3 31 5.817
2 Silty clay medium 6- 9 18 - 25 12.39 17.16 7200 0.3 11.29 6.139
3 Sandy silt 9 - 13 60 18 20 60000 0.3 2 30
4 Sandy clay 13 -17 60 17 19 19800 0.3 15 24
5 Clayey sand 17 - 20 60 15.27 18.63 24000 0.3 5 30
6 Gravelly sand 20 - 30 60 18 20 79200 0.3 1 37
68
69
d. STA 10+450
ROW
ROW
10+450
70
65
1
1
60 WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm
68.912
59.504

BH 02 (MAT -0 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 0- 6 4- 5 10.13 15.61 3300 0.3 31 5.817
2 Silty clay medium 6- 9 18 - 25 12.39 17.16 7200 0.3 11.29 6.139
3 Sandy silt 9 - 13 60 18 20 60000 0.3 2 30
4 Sandy clay 13 -17 60 17 19 19800 0.3 15 24
5 Clayey sand 17 - 20 60 15.27 18.63 24000 0.3 5 30
6 Gravelly sand 20 - 30 60 18 20 79200 0.3 1 37
70
71
e. STA 11+100
11+100
70
ROW
0.5
1 WEEP HOLE Ø50 mm ROW
63.082
69.682
65

BH 03 (MAT -3.5 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 0- 4 4 11.48 16.51 3000 0.3 68.19 6.049
2 Silty clay medium 4- 8 11 - 15 14 18.39 6300 0.3 15 24
3 Sandy silt 8 - 15 60 18 20 19800 0.3 2 30
4 Gravelly sand 15 - 30 60 15.35 18.85 79200 0.3 58 41
Gambar 73 Pemodelan plaxis 11+100
72
59.19 mm)
73
74
4.2.On Ramp Limo 1
60 0+075
OFF RAMP 1 LIMO
55
ROW
50
ROW
47.161
56.432
45
Gambar 78 Cross Section On RAMP Limo 1 STA 0+075

BH 01 (MAT -6 m)
2
1 Silty clay soft 0- 4 6 10.34 15.57 3600 0.3 37 5.9
3 Clayey silt 8 - 15 60 18 20 60000 0.3 5 28
4 Sandy silt 15 - 20 60 18 20 60000 0.3 2 30
5 Gravelly sand 20 - 30 60 15.66 18.78 79200 0.3 55 41
Gambar 79 Pemodelan plaxis On RAMP Limo 1 STA 0+075
75
Gambar 80 Output plaxis pemodelan On RAMP Limo 1 STA 0+075 (Displacement maks 63.94
mm)
Gambar 81 Output plaxis pemodelan On RAMP Limo 1 STA 0+075 konsolidasi 10 tahun
(Displacement maks 39.55 mm)
76
Gambar 82 Output safety factor statik On RAMP Limo 1 STA 0+075 (SF = 1.533)
Gambar 83 Output safety factor gempa On RAMP Limo 1 STA 0+075 (SF = 1.2917)
77
5. KESIMPULAN
Tinggi maksimal Settlement Settlement
Displacement Safety Factor
Lokasi (m) seketika 10 tahun Penanganan
(mm)
Galian Timbunan (mm) (mm) Statik Gempa
MAIN ROAD
9+314 11.465 37.56 1.93 1.49 Pasangan
batu
9+500 8.635 103.9 58.98 1.50 1.61 • Natural slope
1:2
• Timbunan
bertahap 3m
@14 hari
10+025 17.079 83.28 1.53 1.11 Natural slope
1:1.5
10+450 10.965 149.51 1.56 1.30 Natural slope
1:1.5
11+100 6.831 66.6 59.19 2.16 1.62 • Pasangan
batu
12+725 6.182 52.21 2.46 2.10 Pasangan
batu
12+775 7.831 74.17 2.81 2.08 Natural slope
1:1.5
13+350 9.77 91.9 104.41 1.56 1.14 • Natural slope
1:2
• Timbunan
bertahap 3m
@14 hari
13+375 8.74 103 70.7 1.51 1.49 Retaining
wall
14+100 8.96 70.68 78.08 1.67 1.11 • Geotekstile 2
lapis
• Replacement
2m
78
Tinggi maksimal Settlement Settlement
Displacement Safety Factor
Lokasi (m) seketika 10 tahun Penanganan
(mm)
Galian Timbunan (mm) (mm) Statik Gempa
• Material
timbunan
pilihan
• Timbunan
bertahap 3m
@14 hari
14+550 4.92 48.2 1.50 1.26 Retaining
wall
KRUKUT JUNCTION
RAMP 2 4.991 76.07 1.31 1.58 Retaining
STA wall
0+325
RAMP 5 13.715 83.73 106.2 1.91 1.20 • Pasangan
STA batu
1+375 • Natural slope
1:2
• Timbunan
bertahap 3m
@14 hari
LIMO
ON 7.511 63.94 39.55 1.53 1.29 • Natural slope
RAMP 1:2
LIMO 1 • Timbunan
STA bertahap 3m
0+075 @14 hari
OP TANAH BARU
OP 4.750 63.94 39.55 1.53 1.29 • Natural slope
TANAH 1:2
BARU • Timbunan
bertahap 3m
@14 hari
79

Laporan Analisis Penanganan Geoteknik Cijago Seksi III

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Laporan Analisis Penanganan Geoteknik Cijago Seksi III

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

PERHITUNGAN GEOTEKNIK

ANALISIS PENANGANAN GEOTEKNIK

Cinere Jagorawi Seksi III

PT. PERENTJANA DJAJA

BAB 1 DATA PERENCANAAN ............................................................................................. 4

1.1 Standar Acuan ............................................................................................................. 4

1.2 Kriteria Desain ............................................................................................................ 4

1.3 Spesifikasi Pembebanan .............................................................................................. 5

1.4 Data Umum ................................................................................................................. 6

1.5 Data Penyelidikan Tanah ............................................................................................ 6

a. Hasil uji N-SPT lapangan ........................................................................................ 1-8

b. Muka Air tanah ...................................................................................................... 12

c. Parameter gempa ....................................................................................................... 13

BAB 3 ANALISIS TOL CIJAGO SEKSI IIIA ....................................................................... 20

3.1. Main Road ................................................................................................................. 20

a. STA 12+725 .............................................................................................................. 20

b. STA 12+775 .......................................................................................................... 22

c. STA 13+350 .............................................................................................................. 24

d. STA 13+375 .......................................................................................................... 26

e. STA 14+100 .............................................................................................................. 29

f. STA 14+550 .............................................................................................................. 32

3.2. Ramp 2 Krukut Junction ........................................................................................... 40

a. STA 0+325 ................................................................................................................ 40

3.3. Ramp 5 ...................................................................................................................... 50

a. STA 1+375 ................................................................................................................ 50

3.4. OP Tanah Baru + Jalan Lokal ................................................................................... 53

BAB 4 ANALISIS TOL CIJAGO SEKSI III B ...................................................................... 63

4.1. Main Road ................................................................................................................. 63

b. STA 9+500 ............................................................................................................ 65

c. STA 10+025 .............................................................................................................. 68

d. STA 10+450 .......................................................................................................... 70

e. STA 11+100 .............................................................................................................. 72

4.2. On Ramp Limo 1 ....................................................................................................... 75

1.1 Standar Acuan

1.2 Kriteria Desain

a. Dalam perancangan struktur sudah harus mempertimbangkan deformasi jangka

4. Aksi – Aksi Lainnya 6. Pengaruhpada

Gambar 1 Peta Lokasi Wilayah Pekerjaan

.491 APER 382.50 

BRC BRC BRC

.168 427 PELA

MAKAM KMP KRUKUT

  GAS

 STA: 14+718.52

0+907.049 GAS RAMP

GAS Y 9295485.7 -2 KUKUSAN

STA: 14+700 GAS

BOX 0+271.38( Main GAS

CULVERT ELEV:Road GAS

Y = 701024.75 P-2 GAS

X = RAMP P-2 GAS

Gambar 2 Plan Jalan Tol Cinere Jagorawi Seksi III

1.5 Data Penyelidikan Tanah

Gambar 4 Kondisi Nilai N-SPT (BH 01 – BH 10)

FPGA = 1.2 (Tanah sedang, SD)

Gambar 7 Permodelan galian pada PLAXIS 2D

4. Input data atau parameter dalam PLAXIS.

Input Plate Properties

5. Analisa Staged Construction

Gambar 8 Ouput Hasil Running PLAXIS 2D

Gambar 9 Ouput Safety factor

Gambar 10 Cross section STA 12+725

Data parameter tanah:

Model input plaxis: