Anda di halaman 1dari 23

HASIL ANALISIS

- UNIVARIAT
-
Usia
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Dewasa (19-44 tahun) 41 39.4 39.4 39.4
Pra lansia (45-59 41 39.4 39.4 78.8
tahun)
Lansia (>=60 tahun) 22 21.2 21.2 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
JK
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Laki-laki 36 34.6 34.6 34.6
Perempuan 68 65.4 65.4 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0

-
Pekerjaan
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid PNS/TNI/Polri 1 1.0 1.0 1.0
Guru honorer 2 1.9 1.9 2.9
Karyawan 32 30.8 30.8 33.7
swasta
Wiraswasta 8 7.7 7.7 41.3
Tidak bekerja 46 44.2 44.2 85.6
Lainnya 15 14.4 14.4 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
Pendidikan
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid SD Sederajat 4 3.8 3.8 3.8
SMP Sederajat 4 3.8 3.8 7.7
SMA/SLTA 45 43.3 43.3 51.0
Sederajat
D3/S1/S2/S3 51 49.0 49.0 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
-
jenispembiayaan
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Asuransi 8 7.7 7.7 7.7
swasta
BPJS/KIS 94 90.4 90.4 98.1
Mandiri 2 1.9 1.9 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
Frekuensi akses IG RS Syarif Hidayatullah
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1 kali dalam 98 94.2 94.2 94.2
sebulan/lebih jarang lagi
1 kali dalam sepekan 4 3.8 3.8 98.1
hingga 1 kali dalam 3
pekan
1-3 kali sepekan 2 1.9 1.9 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
Waktu akses IG RS Syarif Hidayatullah
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Setelah mendapatkan 14 13.5 13.5 13.5
pelayanan di RS Syarif
Hidayatullah
Sebelum mendapatkan 90 86.5 86.5 100.0
pelayanan di RS Syarif
Hidayatullah
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
Tujuan akses IG RS Syarif Hidayatullah
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Mencari informasi 100 96.2 96.2 96.2
Menyampaikan keluhan 2 1.9 1.9 98.1
Memberikan 2 1.9 1.9 100.0
testimoni/pujian
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
Kebiasaan waktu online IG
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Pagi hari 30 28.8 28.8 28.8
Siang hari 22 21.2 21.2 50.0
Sore hari 2 1.9 1.9 51.9
Malam hari 50 48.1 48.1 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
Frekuensi berkunjung ke RS Syarif Hidayatulla dalam
6 bulan terakhir
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1-3 kali 61 58.7 58.7 58.7
4-6 kali 31 29.8 29.8 88.5
>6 kali 12 11.5 11.5 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
Statistics
INTERACTIVI
VISUALAPPE TY AND
QUALITYOF ARANCE/ EASYOFACC USEFULLNE PRIVAC USERFIREN RESPONSIV VAR0001
CONTENT DESIGN ESS S Y DLY ENESS 2 SIKAP
N Valid 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mean 12.94 9.53 13.25 9.67 10.72 9.47 12.65 12.65 29.07
Std. Error of .159 .132 .182 .125 .062 .101 .220 .220 .366
Mean
Median 12.00 9.00 12.00 9.00 11.00 9.00 12.00 12.00 27.00
Mode 12 9 12 9 11 9 15 15 27
Std. Deviation 1.618 1.351 1.853 1.273 .630 1.033 2.246 2.246 3.735
Variance 2.618 1.824 3.432 1.620 .397 1.067 5.044 5.044 13.947
Minimum 8 6 11 6 9 9 10 10 23
Maximum 16 12 16 12 13 12 20 20 36
Sum 1346 991 1378 1006 1115 985 1316 1316 3023
-
-
KAT_QUALITYOFINFORMATIONCONTENT
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Baik 42 40.4 40.4 40.4
Tidak baik 62 59.6 59.6 100.0
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
KAT_VISUALDESIGN
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid Menarik 33 31.7 31.7 31.7
Tidak 71 68.3 68.3 100.0
menarik
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
KAT_EASYOFACCESS
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid MUDAH DIAKSES 32 30.8 30.8 30.8
TIDAK MUDAH 72 69.2 69.2 100.0
DIAKSES
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
KAT_USEFULLNESS
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid BERMANFAAT 35 33.7 33.7 33.7
TIDAK 69 66.3 66.3 100.0
BERMANFAAT
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
-
-
KAT_PRIVACY
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid BAIK 30 28.8 28.8 28.8
TIDAK 74 71.2 71.2 100.0
BAIK
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
- KAT_USEFIRENDLY
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid MUDAH DIGUNAKAN 20 19.2 19.2 19.2
TIDAK MUDAH 84 80.8 80.8 100.0
DIGUNAKAN
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
KAT_INTERACTIVE
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid RESPON 47 45.2 45.2 45.2
CEPAT
RESPON 57 54.8 54.8 100.0
LAMBAT
Total 104 100.0 100.0
-
-
KAT_MINAT
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid MINAT 38 36.5 36.5 36.5
TIDAK 66 63.5 63.5 100.0
MINAT
Total 104 100.0 100.0

- BIVARIAT
-
KAT_QUALITYOFINFORMATIONCONTENT * KAT_MINAT
Crosstabulation
KAT_MINAT
TIDAK
MINAT MINAT Total
KAT_QUALITYOFINF Baik Count 23 19 42
ORMATIONCONTEN Expected Count 15.3 26.7 42.0
T % within 54.8% 45.2% 100.0%
KAT_QUALITYOFINF
ORMATIONCONTEN
T
% within KAT_MINAT 60.5% 28.8% 40.4%
Tidak Count 15 47 62
baik Expected Count 22.7 39.3 62.0
% within 24.2% 75.8% 100.0%
KAT_QUALITYOFINF
ORMATIONCONTEN
T
% within KAT_MINAT 39.5% 71.2% 59.6%
Total Count 38 66 104
Expected Count 38.0 66.0 104.0
% within 36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
KAT_QUALITYOFINF
ORMATIONCONTEN
T
% within KAT_MINAT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
-
-
Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 10.090a 1 .001
Continuity Correctionb 8.815 1 .003
Likelihood Ratio 10.090 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .002 .002
Linear-by-Linear 9.993 1 .002
Association
N of Valid Cases 104
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
15.35.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
-
-
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 3.793 1.636 8.793
KAT_QUALITYOFINFOR
MATIONCONTENT (Baik
/ Tidak baik)
For cohort KAT_MINAT = 2.263 1.347 3.805
MINAT
For cohort KAT_MINAT = .597 .416 .856
TIDAK MINAT
N of Valid Cases 104
-
2.

KAT_VISUALDESIGN * KAT_MINAT Crosstabulation


KAT_MINAT
TIDAK
MINAT MINAT Total
KAT_VISUALDE Menarik Count 19 14 33
SIGN Expected Count 12.1 20.9 33.0
% within 57.6% 42.4% 100.0%
KAT_VISUALDESIGN
% within KAT_MINAT 50.0% 21.2% 31.7%
Tidak Count 19 52 71
menarik Expected Count 25.9 45.1 71.0
% within 26.8% 73.2% 100.0%
KAT_VISUALDESIGN
% within KAT_MINAT 50.0% 78.8% 68.3%
Total Count 38 66 104
Expected Count 38.0 66.0 104.0
% within 36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
KAT_VISUALDESIGN
% within KAT_MINAT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 9.226a 1 .002
Continuity Correctionb 7.945 1 .005
Likelihood Ratio 9.073 1 .003
Fisher's Exact Test .004 .003
Linear-by-Linear 9.137 1 .003
Association
N of Valid Cases 104
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 3.714 1.560 8.844
KAT_VISUALDESIGN
(Menarik / Tidak menarik)
For cohort KAT_MINAT = 2.152 1.327 3.489
MINAT
For cohort KAT_MINAT = .579 .380 .883
TIDAK MINAT
N of Valid Cases 104

3.

KAT_EASYOFACCESS * KAT_MINAT Crosstabulation


KAT_MINAT
TIDAK
MINAT MINAT Total
KAT_EASYOFAC MUDAH DIAKSES Count 20 12 32
CESS Expected Count 11.7 20.3 32.0
% within 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
KAT_EASYOFACCES
S
% within KAT_MINAT 52.6% 18.2% 30.8%
TIDAK MUDAH Count 18 54 72
DIAKSES Expected Count 26.3 45.7 72.0
% within 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%
KAT_EASYOFACCES
S
% within KAT_MINAT 47.4% 81.8% 69.2%
Total Count 38 66 104
Expected Count 38.0 66.0 104.0
% within 36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
KAT_EASYOFACCES
S
% within KAT_MINAT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 13.435a 1 <.001
Continuity Correctionb 11.867 1 <.001
Likelihood Ratio 13.226 1 <.001
Fisher's Exact Test <.001 <.001
Linear-by-Linear 13.306 1 <.001
Association
N of Valid Cases 104
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
11.69.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 5.000 2.048 12.207
KAT_EASYOFACCESS
(MUDAH DIAKSES /
TIDAK MUDAH
DIAKSES)
For cohort KAT_MINAT = 2.500 1.544 4.047
MINAT
For cohort KAT_MINAT = .500 .314 .797
TIDAK MINAT
N of Valid Cases 104

4.

KAT_USEFULLNESS * KAT_MINAT Crosstabulation


KAT_MINAT
TIDAK
MINAT MINAT Total
KAT_USEFULLN BERMANFAAT Count 19 16 35
ESS Expected Count 12.8 22.2 35.0
% within 54.3% 45.7% 100.0%
KAT_USEFULLNESS
% within KAT_MINAT 50.0% 24.2% 33.7%
TIDAK Count 19 50 69
BERMANFAAT Expected Count 25.2 43.8 69.0
% within 27.5% 72.5% 100.0%
KAT_USEFULLNESS
% within KAT_MINAT 50.0% 75.8% 66.3%
Total Count 38 66 104
Expected Count 38.0 66.0 104.0
% within 36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
KAT_USEFULLNESS
% within KAT_MINAT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.166a 1 .007
Continuity Correctionb 6.058 1 .014
Likelihood Ratio 7.064 1 .008
Fisher's Exact Test .010 .007
Linear-by-Linear 7.097 1 .008
Association
N of Valid Cases 104
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
12.79.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 3.125 1.337 7.306
KAT_USEFULLNESS
(BERMANFAAT / TIDAK
BERMANFAAT)
For cohort KAT_MINAT = 1.971 1.209 3.214
MINAT
For cohort KAT_MINAT = .631 .427 .931
TIDAK MINAT
N of Valid Cases 104

5.

KAT_PRIVACY * KAT_MINAT Crosstabulation


KAT_MINAT
TIDAK
MINAT MINAT Total
KAT_PRIVAC BAIK Count 17 13 30
Y Expected Count 11.0 19.0 30.0
% within 56.7% 43.3% 100.0%
KAT_PRIVACY
% within KAT_MINAT 44.7% 19.7% 28.8%
TIDAK Count 21 53 74
BAIK Expected Count 27.0 47.0 74.0
% within 28.4% 71.6% 100.0%
KAT_PRIVACY
% within KAT_MINAT 55.3% 80.3% 71.2%
Total Count 38 66 104
Expected Count 38.0 66.0 104.0
% within 36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
KAT_PRIVACY
% within KAT_MINAT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.367a 1 .007
Continuity Correctionb 6.197 1 .013
Likelihood Ratio 7.208 1 .007
Fisher's Exact Test .013 .007
Linear-by-Linear 7.296 1 .007
Association
N of Valid Cases 104
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
10.96.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 3.300 1.367 7.968
KAT_PRIVACY (BAIK /
TIDAK BAIK)
For cohort KAT_MINAT = 1.997 1.237 3.222
MINAT
For cohort KAT_MINAT = .605 .392 .933
TIDAK MINAT
N of Valid Cases 104

6.

KAT_USEFIRENDLY * KAT_MINAT Crosstabulation


KAT_MINAT
TIDAK
MINAT MINAT Total
KAT_USEFIREN MUDAH DIGUNAKAN Count 11 9 20
DLY Expected Count 7.3 12.7 20.0
% within 55.0% 45.0% 100.0%
KAT_USEFIRENDLY
% within KAT_MINAT 28.9% 13.6% 19.2%
TIDAK MUDAH Count 27 57 84
DIGUNAKAN Expected Count 30.7 53.3 84.0
% within 32.1% 67.9% 100.0%
KAT_USEFIRENDLY
% within KAT_MINAT 71.1% 86.4% 80.8%
Total Count 38 66 104
Expected Count 38.0 66.0 104.0
% within 36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
KAT_USEFIRENDLY
% within KAT_MINAT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 3.640a 1 .056
Continuity Correctionb 2.721 1 .099
Likelihood Ratio 3.523 1 .061
Fisher's Exact Test .072 .051
Linear-by-Linear 3.605 1 .058
Association
N of Valid Cases 104
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
7.31.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 2.580 .956 6.964
KAT_USEFIRENDLY
(MUDAH DIGUNAKAN /
TIDAK MUDAH
DIGUNAKAN)
For cohort KAT_MINAT = 1.711 1.034 2.832
MINAT
For cohort KAT_MINAT = .663 .400 1.100
TIDAK MINAT
N of Valid Cases 104

7.

KAT_INTERACTIVE * KAT_MINAT Crosstabulation


KAT_MINAT
TIDAK
MINAT MINAT Total
KAT_INTERAC RESPON Count 21 26 47
TIVE CEPAT Expected Count 17.2 29.8 47.0
% within 44.7% 55.3% 100.0%
KAT_INTERACTIVE
% within KAT_MINAT 55.3% 39.4% 45.2%
RESPON Count 17 40 57
LAMBAT Expected Count 20.8 36.2 57.0
% within 29.8% 70.2% 100.0%
KAT_INTERACTIVE
% within KAT_MINAT 44.7% 60.6% 54.8%
Total Count 38 66 104
Expected Count 38.0 66.0 104.0
% within 36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
KAT_INTERACTIVE
% within KAT_MINAT 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.452a 1 .117
Continuity Correctionb 1.853 1 .173
Likelihood Ratio 2.451 1 .117
Fisher's Exact Test .153 .087
Linear-by-Linear 2.428 1 .119
Association
N of Valid Cases 104
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
17.17.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Risk Estimate
95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for 1.900 .847 4.263
KAT_INTERACTIVE
(RESPON CEPAT /
RESPON LAMBAT)
For cohort KAT_MINAT = 1.498 .900 2.494
MINAT
For cohort KAT_MINAT = .788 .580 1.072
TIDAK MINAT
N of Valid Cases 104

3. MULTIVARIAT

Classification Tablea
Predicted
KAT_MINAT
TIDAK Percentage
Observed MINAT MINAT Correct
Step 1 KAT_MINA MINAT 20 18 52.6
T TIDAK 7 59 89.4
MINAT
Overall Percentage 76.0
a. The cut value is .500
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
a
Step 1 KAT_QUALITYOFINFO .734 .499 2.163 1 .141 2.084 .783 5.544
RMATIONCONTENT(1
)
KAT_VISUALDESIGN( .753 .561 1.800 1 .180 2.123 .707 6.379
1)
KAT_EASYOFACCES .782 .570 1.885 1 .170 2.187 .716 6.681
S(1)
KAT_USEFULLNESS( .191 .596 .102 1 .749 1.210 .376 3.896
1)
KAT_PRIVACY(1) 1.016 .500 4.130 1 .042 2.762 1.037 7.357
Constant -1.696 .585 8.420 1 .004 .183
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: KAT_QUALITYOFINFORMATIONCONTENT, KAT_VISUALDESIGN,
KAT_EASYOFACCESS, KAT_USEFULLNESS, KAT_PRIVACY.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai