Nim : 170204007
NO P I C O T
1 Pengaruh Metode Simulasi Bencana Metode Simulasi Hasil dari uji statistic Volume 10, Nomor
Banjir Terhadap Tingkat Bencana Banjir Terhadap - Wilcoxon Signed rank 01, Juni 2019 Hal.
Kesiapsiagaan Mahasiswa Program Tingkat Kesiapsiagaan Test didapatkan ρ = 67-73
Studi Ilmu Keperawatan Fik Unipdu Mahasiswa Program 0,000 yang berarti
Jombang. Studi Ilmu Keperawatan terdapat pengaruh
Fik Unipdu Jombang metode simulasi bencana
Populasinya adalah seluruh banjir terhadap tingkat
Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu kesiapsiagaan
Keperawatan semester 8. Sampelnya Mahasiswa Program
adalah Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Studi Ilmu Keperawatan
Keperawatan semester 8 yang FIK Unipdu Jombang.
memenuhi kriteria penelitian.
2 Pengaruh Simulasi Tentang Cara Simulasi Tentang Cara Dari Hasil Penilitian Jurnal Keperawatan
Menghadapi Bencana Dengan
Menghadapi Bencana - Tersebut Ada Pengaruh Respati Yogyakarta,
Kemampuan Penanganan Bencana Dengan Kemampuan Simulasi Penanganan 5(2), Mei 2018,
Gempa Bumi Di Man 3 Kediri Penanganan Bencana Bencana Terhadap 350-353
Gempa Bumi Di Man 3 Kemampuan
Populasinya adalah siswa man 3 Kediri Penanganan Bencana
kediri, Siswa Man 3 Kediri
3 Pengaruh Penyuluhan Kesehatan Penyuluhan Kesehatan - Dari Hasil Penelitian e-Journal
Terhadap Kesiapsiagaan Menghadapi Terhadap Kesiapsiagaan terdapat pengaruh yang Keperawatan (e-Kp)
Bencana Gempa Bumi Pada Siswa Menghadapi Bencana signifikan penyuluhan volume 3 Nomor 2
Smp Kristen Kakaskasen Kota Gempa Bumi Pada Siswa kesehatan terhadap Mei 2015
Tomohon Smp Kristen Kakaskasen kesiapsiagaan
Kota Tomohon menghadapi bencana
Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah gempa bumi pada siswa
siswa SMP Kristen Kakaskasen Kota SMP Kristen
Tomohon yang berjumlah 307 siswa Kakaskasen Kota
Sampel yang diambil dalam penelitian Tomohon.
ini adalah 60 responden.
4 Pengaruh Penyuluhan Kesehatan Penyuluhan Kesehatan - Dari hasil penelitian Jurnal Ilmu
Terhadap Kesiapsiagaan Menghadapi Terhadap Kesiapsiagaan tersebut Ada pengaruh Kesehatan (JIK)
Bencana Gempa Bumi Pada Siswa Menghadapi Bencana atau perbedaan yang Oktober 2018
Smpn 13 Padang Gempa Bumi Pada Siswa singnifikan antara
Smpn 13 Padang pengukuran
Populasi seluruh siswa smpn 13 kesiapsiagaan
padang. Pengambilan sampel menghadapi bencana
purposive sample sebnyak 75 orang. pada Siswa SMPN 13
Padang pada pegukuran
pertama dan kedua
5 Pengaruh Pemberian Metode Simulasi Pemberian metode - Dari hasil penelitian Jurnal Keperawatan
Siaga Bencana Gempa Bumi Terhadap simulasi siaga bencana tersebut Pemberian Soedirman (The
Kesiapsiagaan Anak Di Yogyakarta gempa bumi memberikan metode simulasi siaga Soedirman Journal
pengaruh positif dengan bencana gempa bumi of Nursing),
Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah kategori lemah terhadap memberikan pengaruh Volume 11, No.3
seluruh siswa SD di kelurahan kesiapsiagaan positif dengan kategori November 2016)
Giwangan Yogyakarta dengan menghadapi bencana lemah terhadap
populasi terjangkau adalah siswa SD gempa bumi pada anak- kesiapsiagaan
Negeri Giwangan sebanyak 370. anak. menghadapi bencana
Sampel dalam penelitian merupakan gempa bumi pada anak-
purposive sampel sebanyak 31 siswa anak.
PICOT JURNAL B.INGGRIS
NO P I C O T
1 Knowledge Levels of Nursing Students Knowledge Levels of This study found International
on Disaster Nursing and Their State of Nursing Students on - significant differences Journal of Medical
Disaster Preparedness Disaster Nursing and between students in both Research & Health
Their State of universities in terms of Sciences, 2018,
Disaster Preparedness their having received 7(8): 165-174
education about
disasters, disaster
nursing, and knowledge
scores on disaster
nursing.
2 Disaster Preparedness Behavior Based on Disaster Preparedness 1. The results showed USA, August 10 -
the Disaster Mitigation And Disaster Behavior Based on - that: There is a 14, 2020
Preparedness Attitudes Of Students Of the Disaster positive relationship
Madrasah Aliyah (Ma) In The City Of Mitigation And between knowledge
Bogor Disaster Preparedness about disaster
Attitudes Of Students mitigation and
The population of this study was all Of Madrasah Aliyah disaster alert
students of class XI MIPA MA of the (Ma) In The City Of behavior with a
2018/2019 school year of Bogor City, Bogor regression equation
with a total sample of 357 respondents. Ŷ = 72.02 + 1.30 X1,
the value of the
correlation
coefficient (ry1) =
0.482, and the
coefficient of
determination (r2 ) =
23.6%.
2. There is a positive
relationship between
the attitude of
disaster preparedness
and the behavior of
disaster preparedness
with the regression
equation Ŷ = 35.58 +
0.59 X2, the value of
the correlation
coefficient (ry2) =
0.421 and the
coefficient of
determination (r2 ) =
17.749%.
3. There is a positive
relationship between
knowledge about
disaster mitigation
and attitude towards
disaster preparedness
as well as disaster
preparedness
behavior. Regression
equation Ŷ = 39.46 +
1.01 X1+ 0.39 X2 .
The value of the
correlation
coefficient (ry.12) =
0.548 and the
coefficient of
determination (r2 ) =
29.7%.
3 Analysis of Factors Related to factor related to the - Factor of knowledge, Date of acceptance:
Preparednessof Puskesmas(Community preparedness of attitude, self- 22-01-2018
Health Center) Nurse in Facing Flood Puskesmas nurse in efficacy, government
Disaster in Kendari City of Southeastfacing flood disaster policy according to
Sulawesi, Indonesia in Kendari nurse perception, and
City of Southeast infrastructure
respondents in this research are 176 Sulawesi. facilities are
nurses of Puskesmas significantly
correlated with the
preparedness of
Puskesmas nurse in
facing flood disaster,
but self-efficacy is
the most correlated
factor with the nurse
preparedness
compared to four
other factors.
ABSTRACT
Background: Indonesia is located within the ring of fire and Yogyakarta is one of the area
which is experiencing with earthquake. The earthquake happened in 2006 left many
victims. Most of them are elderly and children. Not all children are trained to deal with
disaster, therefore it is necessary to conduct a training to elementary school so the children have
a knowledge how to deal with this disaster if it is suddenly happened.
Objective: The main aims of this research is to find out the effect of disaster simulation method
toward the children readiness.
Method: The research design applies quasi experiment with one pre post test design. The sample
are taken by using purposive sample for 31 respondents and the data are collected by using
questioners. The hypothesis is tested by using Wilcoxon test.
Result: The results of this study showed there is influence on the preparedness of disaster
simulation method children with a value of P <0.001.
Conclusion: The training of readiness to face an earthquake disaster increase the level of
children awareness. All of the level 6 Giwangan elementary students is able and involved after
the training was repeated 5 times and most of the children showed that the level of
awareness is categorised as less ready
2
experiment dengan hadir pada saat dilakukan responden adalah nilai P < 0,001
rancangan yang intervensi dan anak berjenis kelamin sehingga target
digunakan adalah one berkebutuhan khusus perempuan yaitu kecakapan anak-anak
group pre and post test (ABK) dengan tuna netra, sebanyak 17 untuk bisa menolong
design. Lokasi penelitian tuna rungu dan responden (54,8%). diri sendiri tercapai
Tidak siap Kurang siap Siap
disabilitas intelektual. Tabel 1. (Suhardjo, 2011).
dilakukan di SDPreNegeri Post Pre Post Pre Post
f % f % f Instrumen %
% f dalam%
f f % Distribusi
Selisih nilai mean pre
Giwangan
Kesiapsiagaan 4 Kelurahan
12,9 5 16,1 22 penelitian
71 23 ini74,2dengan
5 16,1 3 9,7 Frekuensi
anak Karakteristik dan post adalah 5,26
Giwangan
Perempuan 1 Yogyakarta
25 0 0 menggunakan
13 59,1 16 media
69,6 3film 60 1 33,3
Responden
Laki-laki 3 75 5 100 9 40,9 7 30,4 2 40 2 66,7 yang menunjukkan
pada bulan Agustus simulasi siaga bencana di SD N
Giwangan adanya peningkatan
yang di produksi oleh Yogyakarta
kesiapsiagaan setelah
LSM Lembaga Peduli bulan
Agustus diberikan simulasi.
Anak Bangsa dan Tahun
Namun peningkatan
Kluwung Indonesia yang 2014
(n=31) kesiapsiagaan tersebut
bekerja sama dengan Responden
Frekuensi
dalam kategori lemah.
ASB (Arbeiter-
2014. Populasi dalam Presentase (%) Tabel 2. Pengaruh
Samariter-Bund) cabang Pelatihan Siaga
penelitian ini adalah
Indonesia dan materi Bencana Gempa
seluruh siswa SD di Bumi Terhadap
pengetahuan siaga Kesiapsiagaan Anak-
kelurahan Giwangan
bencana dengan flipchart anak Sekolah Dasar di
Yogyakarta dengan SD N Giwangan
kemudian untuk Yogyakarta Tahun
populasi terjangkau
mengetahui Jenis kelamin anak 2014 (n=31)
adalah siswa SD Kesiap Pre
kesiapsiaagaan dalam Perempuan siagaan f Mean SD f
Negeri Giwangan 54,8 anak 31 68,74 8,49 31
menghadapi bencana
sebanyak 370. Sampel * uji Wilcoxon
Laki-laki
dengan menggunakan
dalam penelitian 45,2
kuesioner sebanyak 17
merupakan purposive
Sumber : Data
soal valid dan reliabel.
sampel sebanyak 31 Primer
Analisis data dengan Pemberian Tabel 3. Tingkat
siswa dengan kriteria
Kesiapsiagaan Anak
menggunakan uji metode simulasi
inklusi adalah anak Sebelum dan Sesudah
Wilcoxon (Dahlan, 2013). siaga bencana Pelatihan Siaga
kelas 6; tidak sedang
Bencana Gempa
HASIL PENELITIAN gempa bumi
mengalami sakit; Bumi di SD N
Berdasarkan memberikan Giwangan
bersedia menjadi
Yogyakarta Bulan
gambaran karakteristik pengaruh terhadap
responden penelitian. Agustus Tahun 2014
responden anak kesiapsiagaan anak (n=31)
Sedangkan kriteria
berdasarkan jenis sekolah dasar yang
eksklusinya adalah tidak Sumber : data primer
kelamin sebagian besar ditunjukkan dengan
3
PEMBAHASAN dengan asumsi tidak aktual, atau kejadian-
Keberhasilan didukung oleh
semua proses kejadian yang mungkin
pelaksanaan simulasi pernyataan oleh
pembelajaran dapat muncul pada masa
tersebut karena Steward & Wan (2007)
dilakukan secara mendatang. Hal ini
mendapatkan dukungan dalam penelitiannya
langsung pada obyek sesuai dengan Filina
dari berbagai pihak. tentang peran simulasi
yang sebenarnya (2013) bahwa metode
Hasil observasi didalam manajemen
(Sanjaya, 2013). Pada role playing suatu
menunjukkan ada 3 bencana dapat
penelitian ini simulasi bentuk permainan
guru yang mengukur kesiapan
yang digunakan adalah anak-anak yang aman
mendampingi anak- seseorang dalam
role playing atau dan bentuk-bentuk
anak selama simulasi, menghadapi bencana.
bermain peran yaitu permainan yang sesuai
kemudian anak-anak Menurut Olson et.al,
metode pembelajaran dengan struktur
sangat antusias (2010) dalam
sebagai bagian dari lingkungan atau
mengikuti simulasi penelitiannya juga
simulasi yang diarahkan permainan-permainan
sampai selesai dan menyatakan bahwa
untuk mengkreasi dengan menggunakan
aktif memberikan pendidikan tentang
peristiwa-peristiwa boneka, rumah-
feedback saat trainer siaga bencana dengan
rumahan, yang pada
memberikan menggunakan simulasi
dasarnya
pertanyaan, selain itu berupa game atau
mendramatisasikan
wali/orang tua siswa permainan dapat
tingkah laku dalam
mendukung anak-anak memberikan hasil yang
hubungannya dengan
dengan memberikan ijin lebih baik
masalah sosial.
untuk mengikuti dibandingkan yang
Dengan dramatisasi
simulasi, guru-guru juga tidak menggunakan
anak berkesempatan
memfasilitasi terhadap simulasi.
melakukan,
pelaksanaan pelatihan Simulasi merupakan
cara penyajian menafsirkan dan
seperti terlibat dalam pengalaman memerankan suatu
memberikan informasi belajar dengan peranan tertentu. Melalui
tentang pelatihan menggunakan situasi kegiatan ini siswa akan
kepada siswa dan tiruan untuk memahami aktif membicarakan
orang tua siswa. tentang konsep, prinsip masalah-masalah yang
Pada pelatihan atau ketrampilan ditemuinya, kemudian
siaga bencana pada tertentu. Simulasi dapat menginformasikan hasil
anak-anak digunakan sebagai pengalaman melalui
menggunakan metode metode mengajar kegiatan berbicara.
simulasi. Hal ini
4
Pernyataan tersebut ruangan. sebagian besar dalam saat pelatihan siaga
juga didukung oleh Metode role kategori kurang siap bencana gempa bumi
Siska (2010) playing ini juga dapat sebanyak 22 anak (71%) juga didapatkan respon
terhadap penerapan diterapkan pada anak dan 23 anak (74,2%). anak saat peluit
metode role playing berkebutuhan khusus. Berdasarkan jenis berbunyi ada 4 anak
pada anak-anak usia Pada penelitian ini kelamin, sebelum menjerit-jerit, tiga anak
dini juga melibatkan anak ABK pelatihan sebagian besar tidak peduli dan ada satu
menunjukkan dengan hiperaktif adalah perempuan anak yang hanya duduk
terdapat peningkatan sebanyak 1 orang dan dalam kategori kurang terdiam.
ketrampilan sosial hasil observasi siap sebanyak 13 anak Media pembelajaran
dan ketrampilan menunjukkan anak (59,1%) dan sesudah dalam penelitian ini
berbicara pada anak- ABK tersebut pelatihan menjadi 16 berupa media audio
anak usia dini. kooperatif dan mampu anak (69,6%). Hal visual berupa film
Keterlibatan mengikuti tindakan tersebut didukung oleh simulasi siaga bencana
dan kemampuan simulasi dengan baik. pernyataan guru bahwa gempa bumi. Menurut
anak dalam Pada anak penyandang anak-anak belum Ali (2010), selain
melakukan simulasi ADHD, terapi pernah diberikan materi metode pengajaran yang
siaga bencana bermain dapat tentang siaga bencana sesuai, keberhasilan
menunjukkan semua dilakukan untuk baik di dalam proses belajar mengajar
anak aktif dalam membantu intrakurikuler maupun juga didukung oleh
melakukan setiap mengendalikan ekstrakurikuler. Materi media pengajaran yang
tindakan simulasi aktivitas yang tentang bencana gempa digunakan. Penggunaan
setelah dilakukan 5 berlebihan bumi ada di mata media pengajaran
kali. Tindakan (hiperaktivitas), melatihpelajaran IPA dan didasarkan kepada
simulasi terdiri dari 6 kemampuan hanya sebatas pemilihan yang tepat
tindakan yang mempertahankan pengetahuan tentang sehingga memperbesar
dilakukan di dalam perhatian pada objek apa itu gempa bumi. arti dan fungsi dalam
ruangan dan di luar tertentu, Kondisi psikologi menunjang efektifitas
mengembangkan konsentrasi pada anak seperti cemas dan takut dan efisiensi proses
ketrampilan menunggu ADHD (Hatiningsih, dapat mempengaruhi belajar mengajar.
giliran, dan 2013). kesiapan anak dalam
mengendalikan tingkat Kesiapsiagaan anak- menghadapi bencana
agresivitas (Landreth, anak sebelum dan gempa bumi. Hasil
2001). Terapi bermain sesudah diberikan observasi yang
dapat meningkatkan simulasi siaga bencana dilakukan peneliti pada
5
Media t e dalam Suhardjo (2011)
pembelajaran yang n cara mengajarkan
digunakan selain B d dengan menggunakan
media audio visual B o lagu bermain
dalam penelitian ini M r merupakan pesan dan
adalah dengan K o peringatan ketika
mengajarkan anak ” terjadi gempa.
n
lagu “ BBMK” Pendidikan dini dengan
g
mengutip dari “ permainan adalah hal
melody: Potong J yang sangat menarik
d
Bebek, lirik lagunya a dan mengesan bagi
a
sebagai berikut: n anak- anak karena
n
“Kalau ada gempa g mudah diingat,
”
lindungi kepala” dipahami apa yang
a
“ harus dilakukan pada
n “
K saat bencana datang.
J
a Hal tersebut juga
B a
l didukung dari hasil
e n
a observasi bahwa anak-
r g
u anak cepat menghafal
l a
lagu BBMK dan
a n
a bernyanyi saat
r
d melakukan simulasi.
i K
a Meningkatnya
” e
kesiapsiagaan siswa
m
g “Jangan Berisik” didukung oleh peran
b
e “ guru dan orang tua.
a
J Sekolah siaga bencana
m
l merupakan rencana
p a
i tindak lanjut untuk
a n
menjadikan SD N
g
2 Giwangan sebagai SD
i a
x inklusi siaga bencana.
n n
” Pelatihan dan
g
pemberikan edukasi
a M Menurut Setyaningrum
6
terhadap guru dan dan pembuatan peta di luar komunitas Surachman, Sudomo, J &
Wiyatmo, Y. (2012).
orang tua siswa evakuasi; pelatihan sekolah seperti dengan
Pengembangan Teknik
dilakukan terpadu tanggap darurat; orang tua siswa. Mitigasi Dan
Manajemen Bencana
dan berkelanjutan. pengembangan KESIMPULAN
Alam Gempabumi Bagi
Program sekolah sekolah yang aman; Pemberian metode
siaga bencana simulasi; Pelatihan simulasi siaga bencana
meliputi program 6 pengintegrasian gempa bumi
bulan dan 9 bulan. pengurangan risiko memberikan pengaruh
Beberapa materi bencana ke positif dengan kategori
yang diajarkan dan kurikulum sekolah lemah terhadap
kegiatan yang dan metode kesiapsiagaan
dilakukan antara lain: pembelajaran menghadapi bencana
lokakarya PAKEM; peningkatan gempa bumi pada
pengurangan resiko kapasitas guru anak-anak.
bencana; pengenalan DAFTAR PUSTAKA
dan siswa; pembuatan emergency plan dan American Academy of
Pediatrics. (2008).
modul, film dan poster proses reunifikasi, selain Disaster Planning for
serta lomba sekolah itu alat komunikasi Schools.
Pediatrics,122, 4
bencana (World seperti TV, radio dan HP
atau telepon sebagai Ali, M. (2010). Guru
Vision Indonesia,
Dalam Proses Belajar
strategi kesiapan
2011). Mengajar. Bandung:
bencana. Media Sinar Baru Algensindo
Pernyataan informasi seperti koran,
tersebut juga didukung poster di pasang BNPB. (2014).
American Academy of Data dan
ditempat yang strategis Informasi
Pediatrics (2008) sehingga setiap orang Bencana
bahwa salah satu Indonesia.
dapat mengetahui
http://dibi.bnpb.go.id/Des
aspek yang paling informasi yang Inventar/simple_data.jsp.
penting di tahap disampaikan. Sekolah diakses: 13 Mei 2014
kesiapan dalam juga perlu memastikan
menghadapi bencana di Dahlan, M.S. (2013).
bahwa komunikasi saat
Statistik Untuk
sekolah adalah bencana sudah Kedokteran dan
memberikan direncanakan dengan Kesehatan. Jakarta:
Salemba Medika
pemahaman terhadap baik antar komunitas di
orang tua tentang dalam sekolah maupun
Dwisiwi, R.S,
7
Komunitas SMP DI Philadelphia: Jakarta: Kencana
Kabupaten Bantul Brounner-Routledge Prenadamedia Group
Yogyakarta. Prosiding
Seminar Nasional
Penelitian. Olson, D.K, Scheller, Siska, Y. (2011).
Pendidikan dan A, Larson, S, Lindeke, Penerapan Metode
Penerapan MIPA. L & Edwardson, S. Bermain Role Playing
Fakultas MIPA. (2010). Using Gaming Dalam Meningkatkan
Universitas Negeri Simulation to Ketrampilan Sosial Dan
Yogyakarta Evaluate Ketrampilan
Berbicara Anak Usia
Bioterrorism and
Dini. Tesis.
Emergency
Filina.(2013). Universitas
Efektifitas Metode Readiness Education. Pendidikan Indonesia
Role playing Untuk Public Health Rep,
meningkatkan May-June 2010, 125,
Kosakata Anak 468-477 Suhardjo, D. (2011).
tunarungu. Jurnal Ilmu Arti Penting
Peraturan Pemerintah Pendidikan Mitigasi
Pendidikan khusus,
Republik Indonesia. Bencana Dalam
1(1)
(2008). Mengurangi Resiko
Penyelenggaraan Bencana. Cakrawala
Hatiningsih, N. Penanggulangan Pendidikan, Juni, Th.
(2013). Play Therapy Bencana. No 21 XXX, 2
untuk
Meningkatkan
Rinaldi. (2009).
Konsentrasi pada
Kesiapan Menghadapi
Anak Attention
Bencana Pada
Deficit Hyperactive
Masyarakat Indonesia.
Disorder (ADHD). Universitas Negeri
Jurnal Ilmiah Padang. Jurnal
Psikologi Terapan, Penelitian Psikologi
1(2) 14(1)
Sanjaya, W. (2013).
Landreth, G.L.(2001). Strategi
Innovations in Play Pembelajaran:
Therapy: Issues, Berorientasi Standar
Process, and Special Proses Pendidikan.
Populations.
8
Steward, D & Wan, T.T.(2007). The Role of
Simulation and Modeling in Disaster Management. J Med
Syst. 3, 125–130.
40
41
PENGARUH PENYULUHAN KESEHATAN TERHADAP
KESIAPSIAGAAN MENGHADAPI BENCANA GEMPA BUMI
PADA SISWA SMPN 13 PADANG
Revi Neini Ikbal1, Rebbi Permata Sari2
1,
STIKes Alifah, Jln.Khatib Sulaiman No.52B, Padang, 25000, Indonesia
Email: revineini@gmail.com
2,
STIKes Alifah, Jln.Khatib Sulaiman No.52B, Padang, 25000, Indonesia
Email: rebbi.permatasari@gmail.com
ABSTRAK
ABSTRACK
This study aims to determine the effect of health counseling on preparedness to face an
earthquake disaster on students SMPN 13 of Padang. This type of research uses Quasi Experiment
with the design of a single group one group pre-test design. Data collection was carried out at SMPN
13 Padang in June-February 2018. The population of all students was SMP 13 Padang. purposive
sample collection of 75 people. The analysis used univariate and bivariate with Test T. The results of
this study the average student preparedness SMPN 13 of Padang in dealing with earthquake disasters
before being given counseling was 17.36 and the average Student Preparedness of SMP 13 Padang
after being given counseling was 56.20 and there was influence or a significant difference between
the measurement of disaster preparedness for students of SMPN 13 Padang with a p value of 0,000.
It can be concluded that there is a significant influence or difference between disaster preparedness
measurement for students of SMP 13 Padang in the first and second measurements. It is expected that
the schools of SMPN 13 Padang form a disaster preparedness team and increase student skills
towards disaster mitigation.
42
Keywords: Health Counseling, Disaster Preparednes
43
2011).
PENDAHULUAN Faktor utama yang mengakibatkan timbulnya
banyak korban akibat bencana gempa adalah karena
Indonesia merupakan Kepulauan Nusantara kurangnya kesiapsiagaan masyarakat tentang bencana
berada dalam zona tektonik dan gunung api dan kurangnya kesiapan masyarakat dalam
sehingga sangat rawan terjadinya bencana. Ini mengantisipasi bencana tersebut. Faktor utama yang
merupakan tanggung jawab dan kewajiban menjadi kunci kesiapsiagaan adalah pengetahuan, sikap
pemerintah dalam melakukan antisipasi bencana dan kepedulian siap siaga dalam menghadapi bencana.
baik sebelum atau sesudah terjadinya suatu bencana Kesiapsiagaan merupakan salah satu proses
(Pranajati, 2013). manajemen bencana, pentingnya kesiapsiagaan
Pemerintah melakukan berbagai upaya merupakan salah satu
pengurangan resiko bencana dengan dikeluarkannya
Undang-undang tentang Penanggulangan Bencana
(BNPB, 2007) dan Peraturan Kepala Badan
Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana Nomor 4 Tahun
2008 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Rencana
Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB, 2008).
Berdasarkan PERATURAN Menteri Energi dan
Sumber Daya Mineral Republik Indonesia Nomor 11
Tahun 2016 ditetapkan jenis bencana terutama
geologi atas beberapa diantaranya ; Gunung api,
Gempa Bumi, Tsunami dan Gerakan Tanah.
Khususnya derah Sumatera Barat yang menjadi
prioritas utama untuk penanggulangan bencana
adalah gempa bumi (BNPB, 2008).
Ancaman gempa bumi mendapat perhatian
yang luas, karena sifatnya mendadak, dapat
diprediksi namun sulit ditentukan waktu terjadinya
(Andri Nurudin, 2015). Menurut catatan sejarah
dalam kurun waktu setengah abad terakhir tercatat
terjadi puluhan bencana alam gempa bumi merusak
kawasan pesisir pantai Indonesia. Beberapa kali
gempa besar di Indonesia dengan selang waktu yang
tidak terlalu lama telah meluluh lantakkan wilayah
Indonesia, yaitu gempa dan tsunami aceh pada
tanggal 26 Desember 2004. Gempa berkekuatan 8,9
SR di Samudera Indonesia, 32 km dan pantai
Meulaboh Aceh Barat (Syafrizal, 2013). Gempa
dasyat juga terjadi di Sumatera Barat juga terjadi
pada tanggal 30 September 2009 di lepas pantai
Sumatera, sekitar 50 km barat laut Kota Padang
Menurut data Satkorlak PB, sebanyak 1.117 orang
tewas akibat gempa ini yang tersebar di 3 kota dan
4 kabupaten di Sumatera Barat, korban luka berat
mencapai 1.214 orang, luka ringan 1.688 orang,
korban hilang 1 orang. Sedangkan 135.448 rumah
rusak berat,
65.380 rumah rusak sedang, dan 78.604 rumah
rusak ringan (Konsorsium Pendidikan Bencana,
purposive samplingdengan kriteria inklusi Bersedia
elemen penting dari kegiatan penurangan resiko menjadi responden dan Siswa kelas VII dan VIII.
terjadinya bencana (Firmasnyah, 2014). Pengolahan data melalui analisa data secara
Banyak upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk univariat dan bivariat menggunakan uji T-Tes
meminimalkan banyaknya korban saat terjadinya Dependent
gempa bumi, korban jiwa yang paling banyak
adalah wanita dan anak-anak. Salah satunya HASIL
dengan melakukan penyuluhan kesehatan
keberbagai Instansi , lembaga serta masyarakat a. Analisa Univariat
yang ada terutama Sekolah. Sekolah dapat Analisis univariat digunakan untuk mengetahui
berfungsi sebagai media informasi efektif untuk rata- rata dari masing-masing variabel yang diteliti,
mengubah pola pikir dan pola prilaku masyarakat bertujuan
dengan memberikan pendidikan pengurangan
resiko bencana di sekolah.
Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Riedel, dkk
tahun 2015 melaporkan terdapat pengaruh
penyuluhan kesehatan terhadap kesiapsiagaan
menghadapi bencana gempa bumi pada siswa
SMP Kristen Kakaskasen Kota Tumohon.
Penelitian ini akan memperkuat peneliti untuk
melanjutnya penelitian ini dikarenakan sangat
pentingnya kesiapsiagaan bencana gempa bumi di
Kota Padang khsusnya anak-anak untuk
menghindari resiko banyak korban.
Sumatera Barat merupakan salah satu
provinsi di pulau Sumatera yang rawan terjadinya
gempa bumi karena berbatasan langsung dengan
lautan Hindia. Kota Padang yang merupakan ibu
kota provinsi juga menjadi daerah yang rawan
akan bencana gempa bumi. Khususnya sekolah-
sekolah di Kota Padang saat sekarang memang
menjadi suatu program yang harus dilakukan
kegiatan penyuluhan kesiapsiagaan bencana oleh
pemerintah. Oleh karena itu peneliti tertarik
melakukan penelitian dengan judul “Pengaruh
penyuluhan kesehatan terhadap kesiapsiagaan
menghadapi bencana gempa bumi pada Siswa
SMP 13 Padang”.
METODA PENELITIAN
95% CI
Variabel N Mean SD Min-
Maks Lower Upper
K
Kesiapsiaga 18.16
an Siswa 75 17.36 3.46 9-26 16.56 S
Kesiapsiagaan 56,20 3.029
0.350
2. Distribusi
Kesiapsiagaan
Siswa
Menghadapi
Bencana Gempa
42
Siswa Sesudah Kesiapsiagaan 95% CI
Siswa 1.
Variabel N Mean SD Min-
Maks Upper
Menghadapi Bencana
Lower
Berdasarkan Bumi Sebelum Diberikan Penyuluhan
Kesiapsiaga Gempa
75 56,20 3.029 14-27 55,46 57,65
tabel
an 3.3
Siswadi atas dapat
dilihat bahwa
Hasil
didapatkan rata-rata
peneli
kesiapsiagaan pada
menje
pengukuran pertama
kan
17,36 dengan standar
bahwa
deviasi 3,463. Pada
apatka
pengukuran Kedua
didapat rata-rata Berdasarkan rata-rata
kesiapsiagaan 56,20 tabel 3.2 didapatkan kesiapsiagaan Siswa
dengan standar rata-rata SMPN13 Padang
deviasi 3.029. Telihat KesiapsiagaanSiswa dalam menghadapi
nilai mean perbedaan SMPN13 Padang bencana gempa bumi
pada pengukuran setelah diberikan pada pretest adalah
pertama dan kedua penyuluhan adalah 17,36 dengan
adalah 38,66. Hasil 56,20dengan Standar Deviasi 3,46
uji statistik Standar Deviasi dengan tingkat
didapatkan nilai p 3,029. Tingkat pengetahuan yang
value 0,000 (P<0,05) Pengetahuan yang rendah 9 dan
maka dapat rendah 14 dan tertinggi 26. Hasil
disimpulkan ada tertinggi 27. Hasil estimasi dapat
pengaruh atau estimasi dapat disimpulkan bahwa
perbedaan yang disimpulkan bahwa 95% diyakini rata-
singnifikan antara 95% diyakini rata- rata kesiapsiagaan
pengukuran rata kesiapsigaan siswa dalam
kesiapsiagaan adalah antara 55,46 menghadapi bencana
menghadapi bencana sampai dengan gempa bumi adalah
pada Siswa SMPN 13 57,65. antara 16,56 sampai
Padang pada dengan 18,16.
pegukuran pertama b. Analisis Bivariat Hasil penelitian
dan kedua ini sama dengan
hasil penelitian
yang dilakukan oleh
PEMBAHASAN
Sisiana Besti Emami
A. Analisi Univariat tahun 2015, dengan
hasil adanya
pengaruh
kesiapsiagaan
menghadapi bencana Selain itu hasil
gempa bumi pada penelitian ini juga
Siswa SD didukung dengan hasil
Muhammadiyah penelitian lainnya yang
Trisigan Murtigading dilakukan oleh Riedel
Sandel Bantul Jiemly dkk dengan
dengan hasil uji hasil penelitian ada
paired sample t- pengaruh penyuluhan
testnya menunjukkan kesehatan terhadap
nilai Pvalue0,000. kesiapsiagaan bencana
43
gempa bumi pada yang dikeluarkan oleh penelitian yang menghadapi
Siswa SMP Kristen BNPB No.4 Tahun peneliti dapatkan, bencana gempa
Kakaskaseh Kota 2012 tentang setelah peneliti bumi. Ini terlihat
Tumohon Tahun “Pedoman Penerapan melakukan analisa dari hasil rata-rata
2015 dengan nilai Sekolah/Madrasah terhadap hasil pretest pretest siswa
Pvalue 0,000. Aman dari Bencana” yang sudah adalah 17,36 dari
Secara teori telah direncanakan dan dikerjakan oleh siswa 75 orang siswa
kesiapsiagaan adalah dilaksanakan upaya- terlihat bahwa masih yang diambil
tindakan- tindakan upaya untuk banyak siswa yang menjadi sampel
yang memungkinkan memberikan ilmu tidak memahami dalam penelitian.
pemerintah, pengetahuan serta skill konsep dari pada Berdasarkan
organisasi, kepada beberapan kesiapsiagaan analisa yang
masyarakat, sekolah/madrasah yang dilakukan peneliti
komunitas dan ada di Indonesia dalam jawaban
individu untuk termasuk Kota Padang. siswa pada item
mampu menanggapi SMPN 13 Padang kuesioner yang
suatu situasi bencana merupakan SMPN diberikan, terlihat
secara cepat dan tepat yang sudah pernah pada konsep
guna. Termasuk mendapatkan sentuhan pengetahuan siswa
kedalam tindakan atau materi ilmu banyak tidak
kesiapsiagaan adalah pengetahuan tentang memahami
penyusunan rencana mitigasi bencana oleh pertanyaan nomor
penanggulangan BPBD Kota Padang, satu yang
bencana, dan terakhir ilmu itu menyatakan
pemeliharaan dan didapatkan hanya pengertian dari
pelatihan personil. untuk kelas 8 dan 9. bencana. Artinya
Kesiapsiagaan Sehingga untuk secara konsep atau
merupakan upaya penelitian yang teori siswa masih
yang dilaksanakan dilakukan peneliti lemah dengan
untuk mengantisipasi sekarang hanya pegetahuan
kemungkinan melibatkan kelas 7 bencana. Tidak
terjadinya bencana saja. Sebelum hanya itu
guna menghindari penyuluhan diberikan pertanyaan tentang
jatuhnya korban jiwa, oleh BPBD maka apa yang dilakukan
kerugian harta benda, dilakukan terlebih jika terjadi bencana
dan berubahnya tata dahulu pretest untuk gempa disekolah
kehidupan melihat kemampuan masih banyak yang
masyarakat. dari pada siswa dalam kurang memahami,
Sebaiknya setiap siaga bencana gempa sehingga peneliti
instansi melakukan bumi. Secara teori merasa sangat perlu
kesiapsiagaan dikatakan setiap dilakukannya
(Nugroho, 2007). individu yang belum penelitian ini. Item
Kesiapsiagaan bisa pernah tersentuh lainnya yang
dilakukan apabila dengan ilmu baru maka peneliti lihat pada
peran antara pengetahuan yang kelompok
pemerintah dan dimiliki akan rendah kuesioner tentang
instansi terkait dibandingkan dengan rencana kegiatan
dilakukan dengan yang sudah memiliki dari bencana
baik. Sesuai dengan pengetahuan (Burnie tergambar siswa
tuntutan Undang- D, 2015). Teori ini tidak memahami
undang dan peraturan terbukti dengan hasil tentang persiapan
44
apa saja yang mendapatkan 2. Mitigasi
harus dilakukan penyuluhan masih
sebelum sangat kurang. Hal Kesiapsiagaa Bencana
terjadinya ini bisa dilihat dari
bencana. beberapa uraian Hasil
n Siswa
Selanjutnya pada pertanyaan yang penelitian
item kelompok sudah diberikan menjelaskan
kuesioner tentang peneliti kepada Menghadapi
bahwa rata-rata
peringatan siswa. Pada Kesiapsiagaan
bencana, masih peneltian lainnya Bencana
Siswa SMPN13
banyak siswa yang dilakukan Padang setelah
yang tidak faham juga didapatkan Gempa Bumi diberikan
apa saja tanda- kesamaan dengan penyuluhan adalah
tanda peringatan hasil yang Sesudah 56,20 dengan
tsunami setelah dilakukan peneliti. Standar Deviasi
kejadian gempa Kesiapsiagaan 3,029. Tingkat
bumi yang merupakan modal
Diberikan
Pengetahuan yang
diketahui, pada utama bagi rendah 14
umumnya siswa masyarakat baik Penyuluhan
hanya institusi maupun dan tertinggi 27. pendidikan kesehatan
menyebutkan sekolah untuk Hasil estimasi dapat terhadap mitigasi
alarm. menjadi modal disimpulkan bahwa bencana di SDN
dalam 95% diyakini rata- Cirateun dan SDN
Berikutnya menyelamatkan diri rata tingkat Padasuka Kabupaten
dalam sendiri dan orang pengetahuan adalah Bandung dengan nilai
kelompok lain. Jika ilmu antara 55,46 sampai Pvalue 0,000.
kuesioner tentang mitigasi dengan 57,65. Gempa bumi
mobilisasi sumber bencana sudah Hasil penelitian adalah bergoncangnya
daya, didapatkan didapatkan maka ini sama dengan bumi yang disebabkan
masih banyak perencanaan siswa penelitian yang oleh tumbukan antar
siswa yang dalam menghadapi dilakukan oleh Indria lempeng bumi,
tidak bencana gempa Santoso S.Budi dkk aktivitas gunung api
mengerti bumi akan lebih Tahun 2015 yang dan reruntuhan batuan
tentang apa matang. menyebutkan adanya (BNPB, 2012). Salah
saja pengaruh pendidikan satu daerah yang rawan
keterampilan kesehatan terhadap akan bencana gempa
yang perlu kewaspadaan bumi adalah Sumatera
disampaikan bencana alam di Barat tepatnya di Kota
kepada temen- Dusun Kantong Desa Padang. Di pesisir
temen sekolah Kemiri Kecamatan pantai Kota Padang
tentamg siaga Panti Kabupaten masih banyak sekolah-
bencana. Jember dengan nilai sekolah yang harus
Semua dari Pvlaue adalah 0,000. mendapatkan perhatian
uraian yang Penelitian lainnya khusus untuk
peneliti jelaskan yang mendukung menghadapi bencana
dapat hasil peneltian gempa bumi, yang
disimpulkan peneliti adalah yang upaya salah satunya
bahwa dilakukan oleh adalah Kesiapsiagaan
kesiapsiagaan Pribadi K.S Tahun bencana.kesiapsiagaan
siswa SMPN 13 2009 menyampaikan menurut Nugroho
sebelum bahwa ada pengaruh (2007) kesiapsiagaan
45
adalah tindakan- dijelaskan oleh BPBD. pertanyaan. Ini pada kesiapsiagaan
tindakan yang Item penting diperoleh dari bencana gempa
memungkinkan diantaranya adalah ; keseriusan siswa bumi.
pemerintah, pengetahuan tentang dalam
organisasi, kesiapsiagaan bencana, mendapatkan B. Analisa Bivariat
masyarakat, rencana kegiatan dari ilmu tentang
komunitas dan bencana, peringatan kesiapsigaan Pengaruh
individu untuk bencana, dan menghadapi Kesiapsiagaan
mampu menanggapi mobilisasi sumber bencana yang Menghadapi
suatu situasi bencana daya. diberikan oleh Bencana Gempa
secara cepat dan Pada hasil postest BPBD Kota
Bumi Sebelum dan
tepat guna. Salah satu mahasiswa memiliki Padang. Hal ini
Sesudah Diberikan
yang harus pemahaman yang juga dibuktikan
diperhatikan untuk bagus pada setiap dengan Penyuluhan
mengurangi resiko kelompok item didapatkannya
pasca bencana rata-rata nilai Berdasarkan
adalah penyuluhan siswa adalah hasil penelitian
kesiapsiagaan 56,20. didapatkan rata-
bencana pada siswa Berdasarkan rata kesiapsiagaan
SMPN 13 Padang analisa peneliti, pada pengukuran
yang lokasinya juga siswa akan pertama 17,36
dekat dengan pantai memiliki dengan standar
dan bangunan yang pengetahuan deviasi 3,463. Pada
bertingkat. kesiapsiagaan pengukuran Kedua
Tujuan dari yang baik jika didapat rata-rata
dilakukannya mampu kesiapsiagaan
penyuluhan mengikuti materi 56,20 dengan
kesiapsiagaan adalah yang diberikan standar deviasi
untuk dengan sungguh- 3.029. Telihat nilai
mempersiapkan diri sungguh. Selain mean perbedaan
siswa untuk itu siswa jugan pada pengukuran
menghadapi bencana serius dalam pertama dan kedua
dan mengurangi menerapkan apa adalah 38,66. Hasil
resiko korban setelah yang sudah di uji statistik
terjadinya bencana. pahami dalam didapatkan nilai p
Berdasarkan hasil penyuluhan yang value 0,000
penelitian yang diberikan. (P<0,05) maka
peneliti lakukan Mampu dapat disimpulkan
setelah diberikannya mentransferkan ada pengaruh atau
penyuluhan tentang ilmu yang perbedaan yang
kesiapsiagaan didapatkan singnifikan antara
menghadapi bencana kepada teman pengukuran
gempa bumi oleh dan masyarakat kesiapsiagaan
BPBD didapatkan lainnya disekitar menghadapi
hasil siswa terlihat kita. Resiko bencana pada
mulai memahami pasca bencana Siswa SMPN 13
tentang item-item akan berkurang Padang pada
penting yang jika semua aspek pegukuran pertama
diperlukan dalam masyarakat sudah dan kedua.
menghadapi bencana mengetahui, Hasil
seperti yang memahami dari penelitian ini sama
46
dengan penelitian terhadap kesiapsiagaan. nilai rata-rata pretest
yang dilakukan kewaspadaan Berdasarkan adalah 17.36 dengan
oleh Riedel bencana alam di peraturan BNPB SD 3.46 dan rata-rata
Jiemly dkk Dusun Kantong No.4 Tahun 2012 nilai posttest adalah
dengan hasil Desa Kemiri tentang “Pedoman 56,20 dengan SD 3,02.
penelitian ada Kecamatan Panti Penerapan Jadi perbedaan rata-
pengaruh Kabupaten Jember rata pretest dan
penyuluhan dengan nilai Sekolah/Madrasah posttest adalah 38,66
kesehatan Pvlaue adalah Aman dari Bencana” dengan nilai Pvalue
terhadap 0,000. telah jelas 0,000. Artinya ada
kesiapsiagaan Menurut disampaikan bahwa pengaruh
bencana gempa Undang-undang sekolah dan kesiapsiagaan
bumi pada Siswa Republik Indonesia madrasah merupak menghadapi bencana
SMP Kristen Nomor 24 pasal 1 sasaran utama dalam gempa bumi sebelum
Kakaskaseh Kota Tahun 2007 melakukan dan sesudah diberikan
Tumohon Tahun Bencana adalah pendidikan penyuluhan pada
2015 dengan peristiwa yang kesehatan Siswa 13 Padang.
nilai Pvalue mengancam dan tentang Pada jawaban
0,000. Penelitian mengganggu kesiapsiagaan. siswa di kuesioner juga
lainnya yang kehidupan dan Seperti yang terlihat bahwa jawaban
sama yaitu yang penghidupan dilakukan oleh nilai posttest lebih
diteliti oleh masyarakat yang peneliti di SMPN 13 bagus dibandingkan
Indria Santoso disebabkan baik Padang. Penelitian dengan pretest. Hal ini
S.Budi dkk oleh faktor alam ini adalah kerjasama membuktikan bahwa
Tahun 2015 yang atau non alam antara STIKes Alifah seseorang akan
menyebutkan sehingga dengan BPBD Kota memiliki kemampuan
adanya pengaruh mengakibatkan Padang. Pada yang lebih apabila
pendidikan timbulnya korban penelitian diberikan atau
kesehatan jiwa ini ditransferkan ilmu baik
manusia, kerusakan yang sangat memang berupa penyuluhan
lingkungan, kerugian mengganggu salah langsung kesehatan. Tidak hanya
harta benda dan satunya adalah gempa mendatangankan itu berdasarkan hasil
dampak psikologis bumi, gempa bumi tenaga ahli dalam pengamatan peneliti
(BNPB, 2008). Salah adalah merupakan penelitian ini, setelah diberikan
satu bencana yang suatu peristiwa tujuannya agar ilmu penyuluhan siswa juga
mengganggu dalam lepasnya energi yang dan informasi yang banyak tanya jawab
kehidupan dan menyebabkan diberikan betul-betul dengan narasumber
berdampak sangat pergeseran pada bagian yang sesuai dan seputar gempa bumi.
besar adalah bencana dalam bumi secara sudah diatur oleh Melihat hal
alam. Bencana alam tiba-tiba. Mekanisme Neagara.
adalah serangkaian perusakan terjadi Berdasarkan hasil
peristiwa yang karena energi getaran analisis
disebabkan oleh gempa dirambat peneliti
alam, antara lain keseluruh bagian bumi. dalam
gempa bumi, Salah satu yang harus penelitian ini terlihat
tsunami, gunung dilakukan segera adanya perbedaan
meletus, banjir, mungkin untuk antara kesapsiagaan
kekeringan, angin menghindari resiko siswa sebelum dan
topan dan tanah besar terhadap gempa sesudah dilakukan
longsor. bumi adalah penyuluhan. Ini
Bencana alam melakukan penyuluhan dibuktikan dengan
47
ini peneliti 13 Padang adalah 24 Tahun 2007
merasakan masih 56,20 dengan Tentang
perlu Standar Deviasi Penanggulangan
meningkatan 3,029 dengan tingkat Bencana, Jakarta.
selanjutnya pengetahuan yang 4. BNPB, 2008.
tentang pelatihan rendah 14 dan Pedoman
atau simulasi tertinggi 27 Penyusunan
kesiapsiagaan 3. Ada pengaruh atau Rencana
menghadapi perbedaan yang Peananggulangan
bencana gempa singnifikan antara Bencana.
bumi. pengukuran 5. BNPB, 2012.
kesiapsiagaan Potensi Ancaman
KESIMPULAN menghadapi Bencana.
bencana pada Siswa http://bnpb.go.id.
SMPN 13 Padang Diakses tanggal 18
Setelah dilakukan
pada pegukuran Desember 2017.
penelitian
pertama dan kedua. 6. BNPB, 2014.
tentangpengaruh
Peran Serta
penyuluhan Disarankan kepada Masyarakat
kesehatan terhadap pihak sekolah Dalam
kesiapsiagaan membentuk tim Penyelenggaraan
menghadapi kesiapsigaan bencana Penanggulangan
bencana gempa bumi dan meningkatkan Bencana.
pada Siswa SMPN keterampilan tentang 7. Chairumi,
13 Padang, maka gempa bumi dan 2013. Pengaruh
dapat disimpulkan : mitigasinya Konsep Diri Dan
1. Rerata sebelum mengingat lokasi Pengetahuan
diberikan sekolah yang Siswa Terhadap
penyuluhan berdekatan dengan Kesiapsiagaan
kesehatan pantai. Bencana Gempa
terhadap Bumi di SDN 27
kesiapsiagaan DAFTAR PUSTAKA dan MIN Merduati
menghadapi Banda aceh.
bencana gempa 1. Andri Nurudin,
bumi pada Siswa 2015. Jurnal
13 Padang adalah Pengaruh Pelatihan
17,36 dengan Penanggulangan
Standar Deviasi Bencana Gempa
3,46 dengan Terhadap
tingkat Pengetahuan Siswa
pengetahuan yang Kelas X IPS.
rendah 9 dan 2. Bakornas PB,
tertinggi 26 2014. Pengenalan
2. Rerata sesudah Karakteristik
diberikan Bencana Dan Upaya
penyuluhan Mitigasinya Di
kesehatan Indonesia, Jakarta.
terhadap Badan Nasional
kesiapsiagaan Penanggulangan
menghadapi Bencana
bencana gempa 3. BNPB, 2007.
bumi pada Siswa Undang-undang No.
48
Tersedia online di: http://nursingjurnal.respati.ac.id/index.php/JKRY/index
Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta, 5(2), Mei 2018, 350-
350
Tersedia online di: http://nursingjurnal.respati.ac.id/index.php/JKRY/index
Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta, 5(2), Mei 2018, 350-
24. Pranajati, 2013. Upaya Madrasah Dalam Membangun Hard dan Soft Skill Siswa Dalam
Kesiapsiagaan Terhadap Bencana.
25. Peraturan Kepala Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Nasional Tahun 2008.
26. Pribadi K & Yuliawati A, 2009. Pendidikan Siaga Bencana Gempa Bumi Sebagai Upaya
Meningkatkan Keselamatan Siswa.
27. Dien, Riedel Jiemly, 2015. Pengaruh Penyuluhan Kesehatan Terhadap Kesiapsiagaan
Menghadapi Bencana Gempa Bumi Pada Siswa Smp Kristen Kakaskasen Kota Tomohon. Jurnal
Keperawatan Vol 3, No 2 (2015): E-Jurnal Keperawatan
28. S.Budi Santoso, dkk (2015) Pengaruh Pendidikan Kesehatan Terhadap Kewaspadaan Bencana
Alam Dusun Kantong Desa Kemiri Kecamatan Panti Kabupaten Jamber.
http://digilib.unmuhjember.ac.id/files/disk1 /70/umj- 1x-sbudisanto-3481-1-artikel-l.pdf
29. Setyadi, 2012. Konsep dan Praktik Penulisan Riset Keperawatan. Yogjakarta; Graha Ilmu.
30. Supriyono, 2014. Seri Pendidikan Pengurangan Risiko Bencana Gempa Bumi.
31. Syafrizal, 2013. Filsafat Ilmu dan Metode Riset.
32. Undang-undang No. 24 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.
33. Zamroni, M.I, 2011. Jurnal Penanggulangan Bencana Volume 2 No. 1. Jakarta; BNPB.
351
Tersedia online di: http://nursingjurnal.respati.ac.id/index.php/JKRY/index
Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta, 5(2), Mei 2018, 350-
Abstrak
Indonesia adalah negara kepulauan yang memiliki 17.504 pulau dari Sabang sampai Merauke.
Indonesia merupakan tempat pertemuan 2 rangkaian gunung berapi aktif (Ring of Fire). Dari
keadaan geografis tersebut Indonesia sering mengalami bencana alam, baik bencana gunung
meletus, tsunami, banjir, kebakaran dan lainnya. Banyaknya korban akibat bencana alam
memberikan indikasi bahwa kesiagaan masyarakat terhadap bencana masih sangat buruk.
Masyarakat memiliki peran penting dalam penanganan bencana. Untuk mengantisipasi hal tersebut
perlu adanya pelatihan simulasi bagi siswa SMU cara mengehadapi bencana untuk mencegah
korban lebih lanjut. Tujuan dari penelitian mengetahui pengaruh simulasi cara menghadapi bencana
terhadap kemampuan penanganan bencana siswa MAN 3 Kediri. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain
Quasy eksperiment dengan menerapkan simulasi penanganan bencana pada kelompok intervensi.
Pemantauan kemampuan penanganan bencana menggunakan lembar kuesioner dilakukan pada
saat pre test dan post test dan kemudian dianalisis dengan uji Wilcoxon. Dari hasil uji statistik di
dapatkan hasil Pvalue= 0,000 kurang dari α= 0,05, yang perarti ada pengaruh simulasi penanganan
bencana terhadap kemampuan kemampuan penanganan bencana siswa MAN 3 Kediri. Pemberian
simulasi penanganan bencana dapat melatih ketrampilan , memperoleh pemahaman tentang suatu
konsep atau prinsip, melatih memecahkan masalah, meningkatkan keaktifan belajar, memberikan
motivasi belajar, melatih untuk mengadakan kerjasama, kreatifitas dan, melatih untuk
mengembangkan sikap toleransi sehingga dapat meningkatkan kemampuan penanganan bencana
pada siswa MAN 3 Kediri.
Abstract
[Effect Of Simulation About How To Face Disaster With The Ability Of Handling Disaster
Earthquake Management In Man 3 Kediri] Indonesia is an archipelagic country that has 17,504
islands from Sabang to Merauke. Some of the volcanoes are located on the seafloor. Indonesia is the
meeting place of 2 active volcanoes (Ring of Fire). From these geographical conditions Indonesia
often experience natural disasters, both volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, floods, fires and others. The
casualties caused by natural disasters gives an indication that community preparedness for the
disaster is still very bad. The community has an important role in disaster management. To
anticipate, there needs to be a simulation training for high school students how to cope with
disasters to prevent further casualties. The purpose of this research is to know the effect of
simulation on how to face disaster to the disaster management ability of MAN 3 Kediri students. This
research used Quasy experiment design by applying disaster management simulation to intervention
group. Monitoring of disaster handling capability using questionnaires was done during pre test and
post test and then analyzed by Wilcoxon test. From the results of statistical tests obtained results
Pvalue = 0.000 less than α = 0.05, which means there is the effect of disaster management simulation
352
Tersedia online di: http://nursingjurnal.respati.ac.id/index.php/JKRY/index
Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta, 5(2), Mei 2018, 350-
on the ability of disaster management skills MAN 3 Kediri students. Provision of disaster
management simulations can train skills, gain an understanding of a concept or principle, train
problem solving, improve learning activeness, motivate learners, train for cooperation, creativity and,
train to develop tolerance attitude so as to improve disaster management skills in students MAN 3
Kediri.
Article info : Sending on March 5, 2018; Revision on April 29, 2018; Accepted on Mei 27, 2018
*) Corresponding author
E-mail: rafi.akmalwidiputra@gmail.com
1. Pendahuluan longsor) dan aktivitas manusia. Bencana
Indonesia adalah negara kepulauan alam merupakan suatu peristiwa yang
yang memiliki 17.504 pulau dari Sabang menimbulkan dampak besar dan hal ini bisa
sampai Merauke. Indonesia juga memiliki terjadi karena kejadian alami (disebabkan
lebih dari 400 gunung berapi dan 130 di oleh alam) atau disebabkan oleh ulah
antaranya termasuk gunung berapi aktif. manusia.
Sebagian dari gunung berapi terletak di Berdasarkan data BNPB (Badan
dasar laut dan tidak terlihat dari permukaan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana) tahun
laut. Indonesia merupakan tempat pertemuan 2012 menjelaskan bahwa terdapat beberapa
2 rangkaian gunung berapi aktif (Ring of bencana di Indonesia antara lain gempa bumi
Fire). Terdapat puluhan patahan aktif di dan tsunami, 26 Des 2004 di Prop NAD,
wilayah Indonesia. Dari keadaan geografis 120.000 orang meninggal, 93.088 orang
tersebut Indonesia sering mengalami hilang dan 4.632 orang luka-luka. Ledakan
bencana alam, baik bencana gunung bom: bom Bali I, 12 Okt 2002 dan bom Bali
meletus, tsunami, banjir, kebakaran dan II 1 Okt 2005 serta bom di hotel JW Marriot
lainnya. dan Ritz-Carlton Jakarta 17 Juli 2009. Selain
Bencana merupakan kejadian yang tak beberapa kejadian bencana diatas, masih
pernah diharapkan oleh siapapun dibelahan banyak bencana lainnya yang terjadi di
dunia ini. Namun kondisi alam yang Indonesia.
semakin rapuh akibat perbuatan manusia Banyaknya korban memberikan
sering menimbulkan bencana yang indikasi bahwa kesiagaan masyarakat
datangnya jarang bisa diprediksi. Bencana terhadap bencana masih sangat buruk.
yang sering tejadi akhir-akhir ini adalah Tingkat kesadaran siaga bencana masyarakat
letusan gunung merapi, banjir, tsunami, perlu mendapat perhatian khusus agar tidak
badai topan, hingga nuklir merupakan terjadi hal-hal yang lebih buruk saat terjadi
bencana yang sangat banyak menelan bencana. Masyarakat harus diupayakan
korban jiwa. Aceh akhir tahun 2004 lalu secara mandiri agar saat bencana terjadi
Indonesia dilanda tsunami yang merenggut dapat mengevakuasi diri dengan cepat dan
ribuan nyawa serta membuat wilayahnya tepat. Selain itu kemampuan dan kecekatan
porak poranda. Letusan Gunung Merapi di dari petugas penolong juga dapat
Yogyakarta juga menghancurkan wilayah mempengaruhi tingkat keselamatan
disekitarnya, bahkan hingga saat ini bahaya masyarakat.
lahar dingin masih tetap mengancam. Simulasi cara menghadapi bencana
Bencana alam adalah suatu keadaan merupakan salah satu media yang dapat
dari aktivitas alami (suatu aktivitas visik difungsikan sebagai sarana pengembangan
seperti gunung meletus, gempa bumi, tanah
353
Tersedia online di: http://nursingjurnal.respati.ac.id/index.php/JKRY/index
Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta, 5(2), Mei 2018, 350-
2. Metode
Penelitian ini menggunakan desain
Quasy eksperiment dengan menerapkan
simulasi cara menghadapi bencana pada
kelompok intervensi. Pemantauan
kemampuan penanganan bencana
menggunakan lembar kuesioner dilakukan
pada saat pre test dan post test dan kemudian
dianalisis dengan uji Wilcoxon.
3. Hasil Penelitian
Data umum responden meliputi usia, jenis
kelamin, dan distribusi kelas:
1) Distribusi Karakteristik Responden Berdasarkan
Usia
Berdasarkan gambar
menunjukkan
karakteristik umur hampir separuhnya yaitu
43,5% (n=10) berusia 16 tahun.
354
Tersedia online di: http://nursingjurnal.respati.ac.id/index.php/JKRY/index
Jurnal Keperawatan Respati Yogyakarta, 5(2), Mei 2018, 350-
7. Referensi
Appelbaum. (2004). Critical Thinking and learning dalam www.gargayle.accadia.edu/appelbaum/encyc. htm.
BNPB. (2010). Buku panduan pengenalan karakteristik bencana & upaya mengatasinya di Indonesia, ---
Mason, et al. (2008). Introduction to simulation in winter simulation conference. Oklahoma State University.
Muhajir A. (2012). Peningkatan aktivitas belajar dengan metode simulasi pembelajaran. Universitas Tanjung Pura
Pontianak.
357
Available online at : http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/gjik
Gladi : Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan 11 (02) 2020, 91-97
Permalink/DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/GJIK.112.02
2
Pendidikan Jasmani, Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Komplek Universitas Negeri Jakarta Gedung M.
Hatta Jl. Rawamangun Muka, Jakarta Timur, Indonesia 13220
Abstrak. Menurut Badan Nasional Penaggulangan Bencana (BNPB), sepanjang tahun 2005 sampai dengan tahun 2015,
Indonesia mencatatkan kejadian sebanyak 78% (11.648) bencana hidrometeorologi dan sekitar 22% (3.810)
merupakan bencana geologi. Maka dari itu, tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh latihan olahraga rekreasi
dan kesehatan terhadap karakteristik antropometri dan respon stres pada masyarakat di Kecamatan Sumur,
Kabupaten Pandegglang, Provinsi Banten. Uji t-test menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perubahan yang signifikan antara
pre dan post- treatment, untuk tinggi badan (p = 0,843), berat badan (p = 0,955), BMI (p = 0,822), tekanan sitolik (p =
0,941), dan tekan diastolik (p = 0,834). Serta terdapat penurunan secara signifikan terhadap skala kebosanan dari rata-
rata 4,8 ± 0,35 menjadi 3,3 ± 0,49, dengan taraf perbedaan (p = 0,001). Dalam parameter lainnya, meskipun terdapat
penurunan pada kecemasan (p = 0,533), kesedihan (p = 0,075), kekhawatiran (p = 0,285), dan overthinking (p = 0,571)
namun statistik analisis tidak menujukkan perbedaan pada ke-empat variable tersebut. Observasi yang kami lakukan
menyimpulkan bahwa, melakukan olahraga rekreasi dan kesehatan selama 15 hari dapat menurunkan secara
signifikan terhadap tingkat kebosanan, serta terdapat penurunan terhadap tingkat kecemasan, kesedihan,
kekhawatiran, dan overthinking namun tidak signifikan. Dalam pengukuran anthropometry dan tekanan darah,
peneltian ini menunjukkan tidak terjadi perubahan yang signifikan pada dua variable pengukuran tersebut.
Abstract. According to the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB), from 2005 to 2015, Indonesia recorded 78%
(11,648) hydrometeorological disasters and around 22% (3,810) were geological disasters. Therefore, the purpose of
this study was to determine the effect of recreational sports training and health on anthropometric characteristics and
stress responses in the community in Sumur District, Pandegglang, Banten Province. The t-test showed that there was
358
no significant change between pre and post-treatment, for height (p = 0.843), body weight (p = 0.955), BMI (p =
0.822), cytolic pressure (p = 0.941), and press the diastolic (p = 0.834). Furthermore, there was a significant decreased
in the boredom scale from an average of 4.8 ± 0.35 to 3.3 ± 0.49, with a degree of difference (p = 0.001). In other
parameters, although there was a decrease in anxiety (p = 0.533), sadness (p = 0.075), worries (p = 0.285), and
overthinking (p = 0.571), the statistical analysis did not show any differences in the four variables. Our observations
concluded that, doing recreational sports and health for 15 days can significantly reduce the level of boredom, and
there is a decrease in the level of anxiety, sadness, worry, and overthinking but not significantly. In the measurement
of anthropometry and blood pressure, this study shows that there is no significant change in the two measurement
variables.
359
Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 11 (02), Oktober- 92
Nia Sri Ramania, Rini Syafriani, Tommy Apriantono, Bagus Winata, Ramdan Pelana
penelitian ini bertujuan dilakukan adalah: (1) badan, dan BMI. Selain
perminggu. Setelah
proses treatment Tabel 1.
Karakteristik
(olahraga Kesehatan anthropometry, dan
Gladi Jurnal Ilmu Keolahragaan, 11 (02), Oktober- 95
Nia Sri Ramania, Rini Syafriani, Tommy Apriantono, Bagus Winata, Ramdan Pelana
darah, dikarenakan konsep lingkungan yang kekurangan, seperti: (2) kami tidak
pendeknya waktu baik, serta dibebaskan (1) kami tidak mengukur karakteristik
terdapat penurunan
terhadap tingkat
kecemasan, kesedihan,
kekhawatiran, dan
overthinking namun
tidak signifikan.
Dalam pengukuran
anthropometry dan
tekanan darah,
peneltian ini
menunjukkan tidak
terjadi perubahan yang
signifikan pada dua
variable pengukuran
tersebut.
UCAPAN TERIMA
KASIH
Peneliti
mengucapkan
terimakasih kepada
program pengabdian
masyarakat LPPM ITB
tahun 2019, yang telah
membiayai penelitian
ini.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.00000000 00000483
Dunlop, B. W., Kaye, J. L., Youngner, C., & Rothbaum, B. (2014). Assessing
treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder: The emory treatment resistance
interview for PTSD (E- TRIP). Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 511–
527. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs4040511 Eftekhari, A., Ruzek, J. I., Crowley, J. J.,
Rosen, C. S., Greenbaum, M. A., & Karlin, B. E. (2013). Effectiveness of national
implementation of prolonged exposure therapy in veterans affairs care. JAMA
Psychiatry, 70(9), 949–955. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2 013.36
Izumikawa, K. (2019). Infection control after and during natural disaster. Acute
Medicine & Surgery, 6(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.367
Kessler, R. C., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Benjet, C., Bromet, E. J., Cardoso,
G., … Koenen, K. C. (2017). Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.
European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017. 1353383
Morina, N., Wicherts, J. M., Lobbrecht, J., & Priebe, S. (2014). Remission from
post- traumatic stress disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
of long term outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(3), 249–255.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.03.00 2
Ramania, N. S., Iwo, M. I., Apriantono, T., & Winata, B. (2020). The effect of social
interaction and environment during aerobic dance on salivary cortisol.
Physiotherapy Quarterly, 28(3), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.5114/PQ.2020.95770
Reisman, M. (2016). PTSD treatment for veterans: What’s working, what’s new, and
what’s next. P and T, 41(10), 623– 634.
Santiago, P. N., Ursano, R. J., Gray, C. L., Pynoos, R. S., Spiegel, D., Lewis-
Fernandez, R., … Fullerton, C. S. (2013). A Systematic Review of PTSD
Prevalence and Trajectories in DSM-5 Defined Trauma Exposed Populations:
Intentional and Non-Intentional Traumatic Events. PLoS ONE, 8(4), 1–
5.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.005 9236
Shalev, A., Liberzon, I., & Marmar, C. (2017). Post-traumatic stress disorder. New
England Journal of Medicine, 376(25), 2459–2469.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra161249 9
Zouhal, H., Saeidi, A., Salhi, A., Li, H., Essop, M. F., Laher, I., … Ben Abderrahman,
A. (2020). <p>Exercise Training and Fasting: Current Insights</p>. Open Access
Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 11, 1–28.
https://doi.org/10.2147/oajsm.s224919
Volume 10, Nomor 01, Juni 2019
Hal. 67-73
ABSTRAK
Indonesia memiliki risiko tinggi akan terjadi bencana alam. Tatanan geologi
menjadikan permukaan alam bergunung-gunung dan berlembah yang menyebabkan
potensi untuk banjir. Banjir merupakan salah satu bencana alam yang paling sering
terjadi. Perilaku kesiapsiagaan adalah salah satu cara untuk mengurangi risiko bencana.
Mahasiswa keperawatan sebagai calon perawat memiliki peran penting dalam
penanggulangan bencana. Dalam proses pembelajaran dibutuhkan metode yang tepat
agar mahasiswa memahami dan siap dalam menghadapi bencana. Salah satu metode
pembelajaran yang bisa diberikan adalah metode simulasi. Metode simulasi dilakukan
untuk meningkatkan kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa dalam menghadapi bencana. Tujuan
penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh metode simulasi bencana banjir terhadap
tingkat kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa program studi ilmu keperawatan FIK Unipdu Jombang.
Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pra eksperimen dengan pendekatan one
group pra-post test design. Populasinya adalah seluruh Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu
Keperawatan semester 8. Sampelnya adalah Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu
Keperawatan semester 8 yang memenuhi kriteria penelitian. Tehnik sampling
menggunakan Probability Sampling (systematic simple random sampling). Pengumpulan
data dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pemberian kuisoner sebelum dilakukan
metode simulasi bencana banjir, kemudian dilakukan simulasi bencana banjir. Setelah
simulasi mahasiswa diberikan kuesioner lagi untuk mengetahui tingkat kesiapsiagaan
mahasiswa dalam menghadapi bencana banjir. Analisis dengan menggunakan uji
statistik Wilcoxon Signed rank Test dengan tingkat kemaknaan ρ<0.05.
Hasil dari uji statistic Wilcoxon Signed rank Test didapatkan ρ = 0,000 yang
berarti terdapat pengaruh metode simulasi bencana banjir terhadap tingkat
kesiapsiagaan Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan FIK Unipdu Jombang.
Indonesia has a high risk of natural disasters. The geological condition makes a
natural surface of mountains and valleys that induced potential for flood disaster. Flood
is one of the most frequent natural disasters. Preparedness behavior is one way to
reduce disaster risk. Nursing students as nurse candidates have an important role in
disaster management. In the learning process required a right method for students to
understand and ready to face of disaster. One of the learning methods that can be given
is a simulation method. The simulation method used to improve student preparedness in
facing disaster. The purpose of this study to analyze an effect of simulation method for
flood disaster preparedness on nursing students, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas
Pesantren Tinggi, Darul Ulum.
67
This study was pre-experimental research with one group pre-post test design
approach. The population was all of Nursing Students, in 8 semesters. Sampling
technique used Probability Sampling (systematic simple random sampling). Data
collection was conducted by giving questionnaire before and after an intervention. The
analysis used Wilcoxon Signed-rank Test with significance level ρ <0.05.
The result of Wilcoxon Signed-rank Test statistic test obtained ρ = 0,000 which
means there was an effect of simulation method of flood disaster preparedness towards
nursing students.
69
keadaan yang sebenarnya. dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh
Metode simulasi bencana banjir mahasiswa prodi ilmu keperawatan
yang semester 8 Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan
diajarkan kepada mahasiswa Unipdu Jombang. Pada penelitian ini
diharapkan dapat meningkatkan sampel yang diambil adalah sebagian
pemahaman dan kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa prodi ilmu keperawatan
bencana pada mahasiswa. semester 8 Fakultas Ilmu Kesehatan
Penelitian ini bertujuan Unipdu Jombang. Sampling
untuk menganalisis pengaruh penelitian ini adalah Sistematic
metode simulasi bencana banjir Simple Random Sampling. Besar
terhadap kesiapsiagaan sampel 42 responden.Variabel
mahasiswa progam studi ilmu Independen penelitian ini adalah
keperawatan FIK Unipdu metode simulasi bencana
Jombang. banjir.Variabel dependen adalah
tingkat kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa.
METODE DAN ANALISA Tahap pengumpulan data tentang
Jenis penelitian yang tingkat kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa
digunakan adalah pra eksperimen sebelum dilakukan metode simulasi
dengan pendekatan one group bencana banjir melalui kuesioner
pra- post test design Populasi
kemudian dilakukan simulasi, setelah
dilakukan metode simulasi diberikan HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN
kuesioner untuk mengevaluasi
tingkat kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa Hasil Penelitian
dalam menghadapi bencana banjir. Tabel 1 Tingkat Kesiapsiagaan
Setelah itu menganalisis hasil dari Sebelum Simulasi
Tingkat Frekuensi Porsentase
kuesioner sebelum dan setelah
Kesiapsiagaan
Baik 4 simulasi9,50%
dilakukan metode bencana
Cukup 17 40,50%
banjir terhadap tingkat kesiapsiagaan
Kurang 21 50%
bencana pada mahasiswa.
Total 42 100 %
Setelah data terkumpul, data
diuji dengan menggunakan SPSS,
Berdasarkan tabel 1
dengan uji statistic Wilcoxon dengan
menunjukan bahwa tingkat kesiapsiagaan
tingkat kemaknaan ρ = 0.05 bila hasil
mahasiswa sebelum dilakukan simulasi
yang diperoleh ρ < 0,05 maka Ho
setengahnya 21 responden (50%)
ditolak berarti ada pengaruh metode
memiliki tingkat kesiapsiagaan kurang.
simulasi bencana banjir terhadap
tingkat kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa.
70
Tabel 2 Tingkat hasil ρ = 0,000 yang berarti ada
Kesiapsiagaan
pengaruh metode simulasi bencana
Setelah Simulasi
Tingkat Frekuensi Porsentase banjir terhadap tingkat kesiapsiagaan
Kesiapsiagaan
Baik 25 59,50% mahasiswa progam studi ilmu
Cukup 15 35,70% keperawatan FIK Unipdu Jombang.
Kurang 2 4,80%
Total 42 100 % Pembahasan
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian
Berdasarkan tabel 2 terdapat perbedaan tingkat
menunjukan bahwa tingkat kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa dalam
kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa menghadapi bencana banjir dengan
setelah dilakukan simulasi nilai signifikansi ρ = 0,000. Nilai
sebagian besar 25 responden rata-rata sebelum dilakukan simulasi
(9,50%) memiliki tingkat adalah 64,52 dan setelah dilakukan
kesiapsiagaan baik. simulasi adalah 78,45.
Pengaruh Metode Progam Studi Ilmu
Simulasi Bencana Banjir Keperawatan merupakan pendidikan
terhadap Tingkat Kesiapsiagaan akademik profesional dengan proses
Mahasiswa Sesuai dengan uji pembelajaran yang menekankan pada
analisi wilcoxon didapatkan
tumbuh kembang kemampuan Terdapat beberapa mata kuliah dalam
mahasiswa untuk menjadi seorang tahap akademik sebagai mata kuliah
akademisi dan profesional. Kerangka penciri institusi. Salah satu mata kuliah
konsep Pendidikan keperawatan tersebut adalah mata kuliah kritis 2.
yang meliputi falsafah keperawatan Mata kuliah kritis 2 ditempuh di
sebagai profesi, dan keperawatan semester delapan. Menurut Pupuh
sebagai bentuk pelayanan (2011) agar proses belajar mengajar
professional, hal ini sebagai wujud dapat terlaksana dengan baik dan
landasan tumbuh kembang mencapai sasaran, maka salah satu
kemampuan yang akan faktor penting yang harus diperhatikan
mempengaruhi isi kurikulum dan adalah menentukan metode
pendekatan utama dalam proses pembelajaran yang tepat.
pembelajaran. Selama proses Pembelajaran yang efektif harus
pendidikan ditempuh melalui tahap memiliki rencana dan strategi khusus
akademik dan profesi. Jumlah serta memiliki pola umum guna
semester dalam tahap akademik mencapai tujuan pembelajaran yang
sebanyak delapan semester dan dua baik. Dalam penerapan strategi
semester dalam tahap profesi. pembelajaran pendidik perlu
71
memilih, model-model menghadapi bencana. Teknik
pembelajaran yang tepat, metode simulasi digunakan dalam semua
mengajar yang sesuai dan teknik- sistem pengajaran, terutama dalam
teknik mengajar yang menunjang desain instruksional yang
pelaksanaan metode mengajar. berorientasi pada tujuan-tujuan
Untuk menentukan strategi tingkah laku. Latihan-latihan
pembelajaran yang tepat, keterampilan menuntut praktik yang
pendidik mempertimbangkan dilaksanakan di dalam situasi
akan tujuan, karakteristik peserta kehidupan nyata (dalam pekerjaan
didik, materi pelajaran dan tertentu), atau dalam situasi simulasi
sebagainya agar strategi yang mengandung ciri-ciri situasi
pembelajaran tersebut dapat kehidupan senyatanya. Latihan-
berfungsi maksimal. latihan dalam bentuk simulasi pada
Metode pembelajaran dasarnya berlatih melaksanakan
dalam mata kuliah kritis 2 tugas-tugas yang akan dihadapi
meliputi metode ceramah, diskusi dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Teknik
dan juga metode simulasi. simulasi digunakan pada empat
Metode simulasi diterapkan kategori keterampilan, yakni
dalam upaya meningkatkan kognitif, psikomotorik, reaktif, dan
kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa dalam interaktif. Keterampilan-
keterampilan tersebut diperlukan terluka, dan upaya-upaya yang
untuk mengembangkan dilakukan untuk pemulihan secara cepat.
keterampilan-keterampilan produktif Kesiapsiagaan (preparedness)
yang lebih kompleks (Hamalik, menghadapi banjir adalah kegiatan yang
2008:196). dilakukan dalam rangka mengantisipasi
Metode simulasi mengajarkan bencana banjir sehigga tindakan yang
mahasiswa tentang ketrampilan dilakukan pada saat dan setelah terjadi
dalam menghadapi bencana banjir. banjir dilakukan secara tepat dan efektif,
Menurut Nurjannah dalam Ristyani yang dilakukan tenaga ahli dan personil
(2016) hal-hal yang dapat dilakukan atau tenaga lapangan. Tenaga ahli yang
untuk meningkatkan kesiapsiagaan diperlukan adalah tenaga ahli yang
dalam menghadapi bencana antara memenuhi kualifikasi dibidangnya,
lain pelatihan mengenai bagaimana salah satunya adalah perawat (Colombo,
menyelamatkan diri sendiri dan 2012). Menurut LIPI-
orang lain, koordinasi antara pihak UNESCO/ISDR (2006) terdapat 5 faktor
terkait, menyiapkan perlengkapan kritis kesiapsiagaan untuk
darurat, bagaimana memberikan
pertologan pertama pada orang yang
72
mengantisipasi bencana alam, mempersiapkan kesiapsiagaan
seperti bencana banjir, yaitu: perawat harus dimulai sejak tahap
pengetahuan dan sikap terhadap pendidikan akademik maupun
risiko bencana, kebijakan dan profesi. Dengan demikian, pemilihan
panduan, rencana untuk keadaan
darurat bencana, sistem
peringatan bencana dan
kemampuan untuk memobilisasi
sumber daya.
Metode simulasi bencana
banjir diterapkan kepada
mahasiswa dan dilakukan
didaerah rawan banjir. Mahasiswa
di hadapkan pada kondisi nyata
daerah yang berisiko mengalami
bencana banjir. Tingkat
kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa
meningkat setelah dilakukan
metode simulasi. Dilihat dari
hasil pengetahuan, seorang
perawat bisa melakukan
pertolongan pada bencana dalam
berbagai bentuk sesuai dengan
kemampuan dan ilmu yang
dimiliki.
Kesimpulan
Pemberian metode
simulasi bencana banjir
memberikan pengaruh terhadap
tingkat kesiapsiagaan mahasiswa.
Perawat dianggap sebagai salah
satu profesi kesehatan yang harus
disiapkan untuk menghadapi dan
menangani bencana alam.
Dalam
73
Proceedings of the 5th NA International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Detroit, Michigan, USA, August 10 - 14, 2020
metode pembelajaran yang tepat dapat merpersiapkan mahasiswa sebagai calon perawat
profesional yang siap menghadapi bencana.
Saran
KEPUSTAKAAN
BNPB. 2016. Info Bencana. Jakarta: Pusdatinmas Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana.
IDEP. 2007. Banjir, Peranan Masyarakat Saat Terjadi Banjir. Bali: Indonesian Development of
Education and Permaculture.
Nurjannah, Sugiarto, R., Kuswanda, D., BP, S., & Adikoesoemo. 2013. Manajemen
Bencana. Bandung: Alfabeta.
© IEOM Society
2531
Proceedings of the 5th NA International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Detroit, Michigan, USA, August 10 - 14, 2020
Sobirin, Ahmad. 2007. Budaya Organisasi Pengertian, Makna dan Aplikasinya Dalam
Kehidupan
Steward, D & Wan, T.T. 2007. The Role of Simulation and Modeling in Disaster
Management. J Med Syst. 3, 125 -130.
Yurianto, D. A. 2016. Sudah siapkah kita menghadapi banjir? Jakarta: pusat krisis
kesehatan kementrian kesehatan republik indonesia.
© IEOM Society
2532
Proceedings of the 5th NA International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Detroit, Michigan, USA, August 10 - 14, 2020
ritaretnowati@unpak.ac.id
Ekamilasari
Student of Natural Sciences Study Program, Pakuan University, Indonesia
ekamilasari23@gmail.com
Abstract
Indonesia is a country prone to natural disasters. Indeed, Indonesia has a geological position
which is located at the confluence of three large tectonic plates, namely the Indo-Australian
Plate, the Eurasian Plate, and the Pacific plate and is located in a series of rings of fire which s
'extend along the Pacific Plate, which is the most active tectonic plate in the world. This causes
frequent earthquakes and can cause tidal waves if the plates move in the ocean. Disaster
preparedness is something everyone must have, including students. This study aims to obtain
© IEOM Society
2533
Proceedings of the 5th NA International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Detroit, Michigan, USA, August 10 - 14, 2020
information on the relationship between knowledge about disaster mitigation and preparedness
attitudes with disaster alert behavior and the factors that influence disaster alert behavior. The
population of this study was all students of class XI MIPA MA of the 2018/2019 school year of
Bogor City, with a total sample of 357 respondents. The results showed that: 1). There is a
positive relationship between knowledge about disaster mitigation and disaster alert behavior
with a regression equation Ŷ = 72.02 + 1.30 X1, the value of the correlation coefficient (ry 1) =
0.482, and the coefficient of determination (r2) = 23.6%. 2) There is a positive relationship
between the attitude of disaster preparedness and the behavior of disaster preparedness with the
regression equation Ŷ = 35.58 + 0.59 X2, the value of the correlation coefficient (ry2) = 0.421
and the coefficient of determination (r2) = 17.749%. 3) There is a positive relationship between
knowledge about disaster mitigation and attitude towards disaster preparedness as well as
disaster preparedness behavior. Regression equation Ŷ = 39.46 + 1.01 X1+ 0.39 X2 . The value
of the correlation coefficient (ry.12) = 0.548 and the coefficient of determination (r2) = 29.7%.
Keywords:
Disaster preparedness behavior, Knowledge of disaster mitigation, Attitude towards disaster
preparedness
1. Introduction
Indonesia is one of the countries prone to natural disasters, because, geographically,
Indonesia is an archipelago flanked by two vast oceans of the world, namely the Indian Ocean
and the Pacific Ocean. Indonesia also has a geological position which is located at the confluence
of three large tectonic plates, namely the Indo-
© IEOM Society
2534
Australian Plate, the Eurasian Plate, and the Pacific plate and is located in a series of rings of fire
which extend along the Pacific Plate, which is the most active tectonic plate in the world. The
tectonic activity that occurs causes volcanic arcs that are part of a series of volcanoes throughout
the Asia-Pacific region, often called the Ring of Fire or Pacific Circum series (Amri, Bird,
Ronan, Haynes, & Towers, 2017). This causes frequent earthquakes and can cause tidal waves if
they occur in the ocean. Indonesia is also located on the equator, so its territory is tropical.
During the rainy season, when rainfall is high, this condition triggers tornadoes, floods, and
landslides. During the dry season and low rainfall, drought, forest, and land fires occur. During
the transition season, the natural phenomenon of a tornado becomes a threat of disaster
(Theophilus Yanuarto, Sridewanto Pinuji, Andri Cipto Utomo, Ignatius, 2018).
Environmental damage tends to worsen with increasing human activity, triggering an
increasing number of events and the intensity of hydrometeorological disasters (floods,
landslides, and drought), which occur alternately in many regions of the world. 'Indonesia. Based
on National and Disaster data (2018) in the past ten years from 2009 to 2018, the most
significant number of disasters in 2017 amounted to 2,853 events, while the second-largest
number of disasters was in 2018, which is not very different from the previous year with the
number of 2572 events with hydrometeorological disasters was around 95.45%. The rests were
geological disasters or about 4.55% of events, and these events, West Java, became the third
position for the most significant number of events in Indonesia after Central Java and East Java
with 338 catastrophic event events. The disasters in West Java were dominated by
hydrometeorological disasters, and in 2018, around 99.11% were hydrometeorological disasters
while the rest were geological disasters that did not even reach 1%.
In 2018, the number of disasters in West Java was 338, Bogor being the region that
contributed the most to 78 events, or around 23% of disasters in West Java and all were
hydrometeorological disasters (Nasional & Bencana, 2018) Bogor is more prone to
hydrometeorological disasters such as floods, landslides, and tornadoes. This is evidenced by the
series of natural disasters that occurred in Bogor, West Java, throughout 2018. Frequent rainfall
combined with high intensity makes the land easy to move in order to cause landslides.
Landslides generally occur in the peak area because their hills are steep, increasing the risk of
landslides.
Disasters in any form will undoubtedly hurt humans. Disasters can happen anytime,
anywhere, and can happen to anyone. Disasters can be minimized at risk. Disaster risk reduction
can be achieved by improving disaster preparedness. The lack of community preparedness for
disasters is a factor that makes disaster risks significant. So far, disaster management has only
been done more often after a disaster. This can be seen from the weak disaster alert behavior as
they do not know what to do in the event of a disaster. Lack of public knowledge and awareness
of the importance of maintaining natural resources makes natural conditions increasingly prone
to disasters. This condition illustrates the community's low level of preparedness, which
considerably affects the number of victims of disasters.
Disaster preparedness is in everyone's interest because a disaster can happen to anyone,
anytime, and can happen anywhere. The role of education is very influential in achieving disaster
preparedness. In disaster mitigation education, individual preparation will be strengthened in
learning. The knowledge, skills can demonstrate individual disaster preparedness and abilities
acquired through learning and experience that are effectively applied during emergencies.
According to Chou, Yang, & Ren (2015), when global climate change exacerbates the potential
for damage from natural disasters, there is a need to maintain investment in disaster prevention
education. Disaster education needs to be expanded. Based on the study results, there is a need to
review practical implementation experience and the literature on learning theory associated with
disaster problems.
Children are the most vulnerable age at risk of becoming a victim of a disaster. Therefore,
educating students about disaster mitigation is a step to reduce disaster risk. Preparing students
for disasters is necessary to reduce the risk of disasters at all times. According to Shoji, Takafuji,
& Harada (2020), students tend to study on their own and have a deep understanding of disaster
risk. There must be a particular disaster education program for students who are in disaster-prone
areas.
Knowledge of disaster mitigation is a factor that influences preparedness. The knowledge
possessed can generally influence people's attitudes and behaviors so that they are ready to
anticipate disasters. Disaster preparedness can be improved by increasing disaster preparedness
behavior. If disaster alert behavior can be improved, disaster risk can be minimized. According
to Tsai, Chang, Shiau, & Wang (2019), disaster education is the most effective disaster
management process. However, learning using traditional methods is not enough to transmit past
experiences and arouse student interest; more interesting education is needed to motivate
students to learn more about disaster issues. According to research by Kamil, Utaya, & Utomo
(2019), improving knowledge of disasters can improve students' skills in disaster response. The
results showed a 91.6% increase in students' knowledge and understanding through geographic
literacy. It is therefore planned that teachers will be able to use teaching materials based on
geographic perspectives to strengthen students' knowledge in the event of a disaster.
Preparedness is an effort to anticipate disaster to avoid loss, loss of property, and changes in
people's lives. Husna et al. (2011), Preparing to cope with a disaster is an individual or group
condition with physical and psychological capacities to cope with disasters. Based on research
results, Liou, Liu, Tsai, Chu, & Cheng (2020) show that stress, when a disaster occurs, is
negatively correlated with competence to manage a disaster and motivation to get involved in
disaster management. This means that disaster preparedness is essential to avoid someone's stress
during a disaster, which can have counterproductive results in disaster management.
Preparation must be done in various communities, not just at the community level. The
school community must also be prepared to create school residents from school principals,
teachers, staff, and students who are prepared and alert to disasters. The absence of particular
subjects on environmental education in the event of an informal disaster education has
contributed to the lack of sensitivity of the conscience of our young generation to take care of the
preservation and preservation of the environment. Disaster-based environmental education to
reduce the risk of disasters in childhood is essential (Kamil et al., 2019).
Preparedness is an action that enables governments, organizations, communities,
communities, and individuals to respond quickly and effectively to a disaster situation. Disaster
management plans include preparedness actions. The concept of preparedness used here is
further emphasized when preparing for the ability to conduct emergency response activities
quickly and accurately. Emergency response activities include action steps immediately before a
disaster, during a catastrophic event, and actions taken immediately after a disaster has occurred
(Jeannette Sutton and Kathleen Tierney, 2006).
The role of education is very influential in achieving disaster preparedness, and in reducing
disaster risk, there are three stakeholders, namely individuals and households, government, and
the school community. Individuals and households are subjects and objects of preparation
because they directly affect disaster risks. The government has an important role to play in
ensuring the availability of community needs before, during, and after a disaster. Schools are
stakeholders who play a role as sources of knowledge and disseminate knowledge about
disasters. Schools have a role as a practical guide in disaster management (Shoji et al., 2020).
Insufficient preparation can have an impact on the magnitude of disaster risks. The low
value of the readiness index at the school community level has implications for the importance of
the roles and responsibilities of government, the community, and the school community in
various institutions. These facilities can take the form of political support to schools on the
importance of implementing a disaster education program in each subject. This is inseparable
from the role of the school community as an actor in central increasing disaster preparedness.
According to Muñoz et al. (2019), Brazil encourages schools to become producers of knowledge
in disaster education.
The education function is one of the best media for preparing communities for disasters. In
disaster education, individual readiness levels will be discussed, which will then be improved in
learning. The knowledge and skills also demonstrate individual disaster preparedness and
abilities acquired through experiential learning, which are effectively applied during
emergencies. According to Sonneborn, Miller, Head, & Cross (2018), nurses and all staff are in
urgent need of disaster education and training methods when faced with training or face-to-face
education models.
Disaster mitigation is a series of efforts aimed at reducing disaster risk through physical
development and awareness and the ability to respond to disaster threats. Disaster mitigation is
an activity that acts as an action to reduce the impact of disasters, or efforts to reduce the victims
of disasters, both deaths, and property. The first step we need to take to carry out disaster
mitigation actions is to carry out a disaster risk assessment of the area. Disaster (risk) is the
potential loss incurred due to a disaster in an area and a specific period which can take the form
of death, injury, illness, death threats, loss of security, displacement, damage or loss of property
and disruption of community activities, which are the result of a combination of hazards,
vulnerabilities and capacities in the area ((P2MB) & Indonesia, 2010).
Wu, Wang, Gao, Guo, & Xue (2019) stated that when global warming occurs, the frequency
of natural disasters increases. One of the essential approaches in disaster management is to
prevent disasters and reduce losses due to disasters through public finances. However, the
optimal proportion of disaster prevention and mitigation spending is a complicated issue of
public concern. According to Tanaka (2005), individual preparation is necessary to reduce the
risks due to the impact of disasters. Based on the results of the study of American respondents,
the availability of goods is relatively good, while in Fukui, the community is slightly more ready
for housing, social activities, and educational resources. According to Teo, Goonetilleke,
Deilami, Ahankoob, & Lawie (2019), the government, as decision-makers, needs to consider
how different ethnic groups understand and prepare for disaster management and communication
plans need to be designed to adapt to all ethnic groups in society.
In addition to knowledge of disasters and the attitude of preparedness towards disasters, it is
suspected that there are other factors related to disaster preparedness behavior. Therefore, a study
was conducted explanatory
sequentially to determine the relationship between knowledge of disaster mitigation and disaster
preparedness attitudes with disaster preparedness behavior, as well as knowledge of other factors
related to disaster alert behavior.
2. Research methods
This research was conducted in January-June 2019. The population of this study was all
students of class XI MIPA MA MA in the city of Bogor during the 2018/2019 academic year
with a total sample of 357 respondents. The research design uses a sequential explanatory mixing
method (quantitative-qualitative), which is a combination of quantitative and qualitative research
methods in order to obtain complete, valid, reliable, and objective research data (Meissner,
Creswell, Klassen, Plano, & Smith, n.d.). The research variables consist of two independent
variables, such as knowledge of disaster mitigation as the first independent variable (X 1)and the
attitude of disaster preparedness as the second independent variable (X2)while the behavior of
disaster preparedness as a dependent variable (Y).
of qualitative data
Identification of Collection and analysis analysis of
research data sources quantitative and Conclusions and
qualitative data suggestions
Table 1. ANAVA for the significance and variables of the pure linear regression test
Knowledge of disaster mitigation and disaster mitigation behavior with regression equations Ŷ
= 72.02 + 1.30 X1
Ftable
Variant
df SS ANS Fvalue α= α= Conclusion
Resources 0.01 0.05
Total (T) 207 1987047 9599.261
Regression (R) 1 1942235 1942235
Regression
(b|a) 1 10423.90 10423.90
62.14** 6.76 3.89 Very significant
Remainder (R) 205 34388.31 167.75
Tuna Match
(TM) 22 5274.00 239.73
1.51ns 1.93 1.60 Linear
Error (E) 183 29114.31 159.09
** : Regression is very significant (Fvalue > Ftable)
ns : non significant / regression is linear (Fhitung
< Ftable) df : degree of freedom
SS : sum of squares
ANS : average number of squares
Based on the results of the significance test above, it was found that the F value calculated was
62.14 while the Ftable with the numerator dof = 1 and the denominator dof = 205 at the
significance level α = 0.01 is 6.76 and at significance level α = 0.05 is 3.89. Thus, the price F value
> Ftable, this shows that the equation Ŷ = 72.02 + 1.30 X 1 can be used as a reference to predict the
mitigation behavior of disasters thanks to the knowledge of the mitigation of disasters. The
Disaster Mitigation Behavior
regression linearity tests obtain the results Fvalue = 1.51, which is less than the Ftable (0.05) (22.183) = 1.70.
1
Thus, we can say that the regression equation 0 Ŷ6 = 72.02 + 1.30 X 1 is linear. The regression
equation shows that each increase in a disaster 14 mitigation knowledge score will result in a 1.30
increase in the disaster mitigation behavior 0 score to a constant of 72.02, as in the following
12
graph. 0
10
0
80
60
40
20
0 Ŷ
X =
72
Kn .0
1
ow 05 2
le 10 +
d 1.
ge 1 3 0
of 520
Di 2
sa 530
st 35
er
M
iti
ga
tio
n
Figure 2. Regression graph between knowledge of disaster mitigation and disaster mitigation
behavior
The strength of the relationship between the Knowledge Disaster Mitigation and Disaster
Mitigation Behavior variable is illustrated by the correlation coefficient ry.1 = 0.482y.1 with the
coefficient of determination r2 = 0.2326. This means that knowledge of disaster mitigation
contributes 23.26% to disaster mitigation behavior, while other factors influence 76.74% of
disaster mitigation behavior. To test the significance of a positive relationship between disaster
mitigation knowledge and disaster mitigation behavior, a test for the significance of the
correlation coefficient, namely the t test. If T value > Ttable, then the correlation coefficient is
declared significant.
Table 2. Results of the calculation of significance tests for the correlation between knowledge
of disaster mitigation and disaster mitigation behavior
Correlation ttable
coefficient ry.1 N α = 0,01 tvalueα = 0,05 Conclusion
0.482 207 7.88 2.60 1.97 Very significant
Significance level test requirements: tvalue > ttable
This positive correlation indicates a positive relationship between knowledge about disaster
mitigation and disaster preparedness behavior. This is consistent with Barreto, Mendonca, Rosa,
& Rosa (2019), hate education can improve student readiness and reduce the risk of disaster. The
positive correlation between the two variables with the interpretive value that is classified as low
may be caused by knowledge about disaster mitigation related to disaster preparedness behavior.
However, the response in the form of individual behavior may differ even if they have the same
knowledge. This is consistent with the results of the study by Naja, Mohammad, Haghani, &
Javadi (2019), which stated that knowledge of the intervention group increased significantly
compared to the control group. Learning through virtual social networks shows an increase in
knowledge, which leads to a positive attitude towards disaster preparedness. Factors influencing
disaster warning behavior so that the correlation of disaster mitigation
knowledge with disaster warning behavior is not high can be identified by conducting qualitative
research in the form of interviews.
The results of qualitative research show that several factors make the correlation between
knowledge on disaster mitigation and disaster alert behavior relatively weak, namely internal and
external factors. Internal factors include the knowledge of disaster mitigation that belongs to the
students, as just possessed or known but has not been practiced in the form of disaster
preparedness behavior, lack of concern or d 'attitude of students towards the environment and
possible disasters and students have no desire to behave in the event of a disaster.
Knowledge is an element that influences behavior, but student desires also greatly influence
disaster preparedness behavior. Because when the student wants to be alert to the disaster, it will
motivate the students themselves to have an attitude of disaster alert. This is in line with research
by Sakurai, Sato, & Murayama (2020), which indicates that students participating in disaster
education programs feel the program positively so that they can become agents of change to
create disaster-resistant communities.
Learning in schools on disaster mitigation is still very limited because, for the majors of
MIPA, only a few obtain subjects of geography by cross-interest. In biology, learning is only
studied within the framework necessary skills in analyzing data, causes, and their impact on
environmental change. This positively affects disaster alerting behavior. This is consistent with
research findings from Nurkartika, Murakami, & Chagan-yasutan (2017), which indicate that
limited knowledge of health risks from disasters will lead to increased threats to health risks,
especially diseases infectious, due to the limited supply, health services, and facilities. In the
world of education, disaster education must be supported by learning. These facilities can take
the form of political support to schools on the importance of implementing a disaster education
program in the subjects. This is inseparable from the role of the school community as an actor in
central increasing disaster preparedness. Thanks to the school community, knowledge and
management of disasters can be dispensed from an early age. Also, in Indonesia, Nurkartika et al.
(2017) state that disaster education can be integrated into community disaster risk reduction
programs.
Another external factor is the social environment, which is also very influential because
students rarely discuss disaster mitigation because it is not considered an exciting topic, so it will
affect student behavior because it affects the attitudes of the benevolence of the students.
Discussing disaster mitigation will increase students' knowledge and caring attitude towards
disasters. To overcome these problems, it is necessary to find ways for students to address
disaster mitigation issues. This is consistent with Lai & Tang (2018) research, which indicates
that using social media and mobile devices can be a way for someone to have the desire to find
ways to search, filter, interpret and share content related to disaster mitigation.
The final external factor, the natural environment factor or the level of vulnerability of the
surrounding environment, also affects the correlation, as it is related to the student experience
since students who have experience in 'a disaster will undoubtedly have more alert attitudes, and
attitude is one of the factors that influence behavior, as discussed previously. This can be
explained by the results of the research Ozkazanc & Duman (2015) which indicates that as
Turkey is a region which often experiences various disasters due to geological, morphological
and climatic factors, the community must be equipped with a series of disaster training programs
to prepare for disasters and minimize risks. Due to a disaster.
The significance test found that the value Fcalculated was 44.20 while the Ftable with the
numerator df = 1 and the denominator df = 205 at the level of importance α = 0.01 is 6.76 and at
the level of significance α = 0.05 is 3.84. Thus, the price Fvalue > Ftable, this shows that Ŷ = 35.58 +
0.59 X2 can be used as a reference to predict the mitigation behavior of disasters through
attitudes of preparation.
The regression linearity tests obtain the results F value = 1.35, which is smaller than the Farray
(0.05) (42.135) =
1.46. Thus, we can say that the regression equation
16 Ŷ = 35.58 + 0.59 X 2 is linear. The regression
0
equation shows that each increase in a readiness attitude score will lead to a 0.59 increase in the
Disaster Preparedness Behavior
1
disaster mitigation behavior score to a constant
4 of 35.58, as in the following graph.
0
12
0
10
0
8
2 0
60 0
40 0
0 Ŷ
X =
38
.5
2
8
+
0.
59
50
A
Pr ttitu
ep d
ar e f
ed or
ne
ss 10
0
Figure 3. Regression graph between attitude preparation and disaster mitigation behavior
15
The strength of the relationship between the Attitude 0 Preparedness variable and Disaster
Mitigation Behavior is illustrated by the correlation coefficient ry.2y.2 = 0.421 with determination r2
= 0.1774. This means that attitude preparation contributed 17.74% to disaster mitigation
behavior, while other factors influenced 82.26% of disaster mitigation behavior.
Based on the results of the calculations obtained, T Value = 6.648, while the table = 1.97 at the
level α = 0.05. Because tvalue <ttable, the correlation coefficient between attitude preparation and
disaster mitigation behavior is very important. Thus, the null hypothesis (H 0) is rejected, and the
alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted. Results of the Significance Correlation Test The results
of disaster preparedness and mitigation can be found in Table 4. below.
Table 4. Results of calculating significance correlation test variables Preparing for disaster
mitigation attitude and behavior
ttable
Correlation coefficient α = 0,01 α = 0,05
ry.2 N TValue Conclusion
0.421 207 6.648 2.60 1.97 Very significant
Significance level test requirements: tvalue > ttable
A multiple linear regression analysis between knowledge of disaster mitigation and the
attitude of preparation together for disaster mitigation behavior produces the equation Ŷ = 39.46
+ 1.01 X1+ 0.39 X2 The significance of the attitude of preparation of the regression equation is
carried out using the F test. Based on the test using the analysis of variance (ANAVA), the
results obtained in Table 5.
Table 5. ANAVA for testing the importance of knowledge of multiple regression on disaster
mitigation and preparedness attitude as well as disaster mitigation behavior through the
regression equations Ŷ = 39.46 + 1.01 X1+
0.39 X2
Ftable
Variant
df SS ANS FValue α= α= Conclusion
Resources 0,01 0,05
Total 207 44812.21
Regression 2 13301.74 6650.87 Very
Remainder 205 31510.47 154.46 43.06** 6.76 3.84
significant
Based on the significance test above, it was found that theF value calculated of 43.06 while
the Ftable with the numerator df = 2 and the denominator df = 205 at the significance level α =
0.01 was of 6.76 and the level of significance α = 0.05 was 3.89. Thus, the price F Value > Ftable, this
shows that Ŷ = 39.46 + 1.01 X 1+ 0.39 X2 can be used as a reference to predict the mitigation
behavior of disasters thanks to mitigation knowledge disasters and preparedness attitudes.
The strength of the relationship between the knowledge variables Disaster mitigation and
Preparedness attitude with the Disaster mitigation behavior variables illustrated by the
y.12
correlation coefficient effects ry.12 = 0.545 with the coefficient of determination r2 =0.297. This
means that knowledge of disaster mitigation and preparedness together contributed 29.7% to
disaster mitigation behavior, while 70.3% of disaster mitigation behavior was influenced by d
'other factors. To test the importance of a positive relationship between knowledge of disaster
mitigation and preparedness attitude and disaster mitigation behavior, it is necessary to test the
importance of several correlation coefficients, namely, test F. If F Value > Ftable, the multiple
correlation coefficient is declared significant.
Based on the results of the calculations obtained, F Value = 43.06, while the Ftable(0.05) (2.205) = 3.84. Because FValue
> Ftable, the correlation coefficient between knowledge in disaster mitigation and preparedness for
attitudes with disaster mitigation behavior is very important. Thus, we can conclude that the null
hypothesis (H0) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted.
Table 6. Results of the calculation of significance tests for the correlation of knowledge on
disaster mitigation and
preparedness attitude as well as disaster mitigation behavior.
Correlation Ftable
dof
coefficient df counters FValue Conclusion
ry.12 denoinator α = 0.01 α = 0.05
Very
0545 2 205 43.06 6.76 3.84
significant
Significance level test requirements: Fvalue > Ftable
There is a positive correlation between knowledge about disaster mitigation and attitude
towards preparedness as well as disaster alert behavior. This shows that doubts about mitigating
disasters and preparing a person for disasters can lead to disaster preparedness behavior. The
strength of the relationship (ry. 12) is 0.545, which means it is quite strong. This is in line with
research findings from Lin & Chang (2019), which states that local knowledge can be used to
reduce disaster risk. For this reason, there is a need to set up a training program for the
community on disaster mitigation in order to improve disaster alert behavior. Also, Nurkartika et
al. (2017) highlight the need for education for the community, including schools created in the
form of modules, short courses, training, or promotion in the print and visual media to reduce the
threat of risk to health due to disasters. Hoffmann & Muttarak (2017) indicate that education can
improve thinking and problem-solving skills in disaster risk reduction efforts.
4. Conclusion
From the above research, we can conclude: 1). There is a positive relationship between
knowledge about disaster mitigation and disaster preparedness, the value of the correlation
coefficient (ry1) = 0.482, and the coefficient of determination (r2) = 23.6%. 2) There is a positive
relationship between the attitude of disaster preparedness and the behavior of disaster
preparedness. Correlation coefficient (ry2) = 0.421 and determination coefficient (r2) = 17.749%.
3) There is a positive relationship between knowledge about disaster mitigation and attitude
towards disaster preparedness as well as disaster preparedness behavior. The value of the
correlation coefficient (ry.12) = 0.548 and the coefficient of determination (r2) = 29.7%.
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements are conveyed to the Rector, Dean of the Graduate Program, Dean of the
Faculty of Teaching and Education, Chairman of the Pakuan University Research and
Community Service Institute, and all involved in this research. These research funds come from
grants from the Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia for the year 2019.
Reference
(P2MB), P. P. M. B., & INDONESIA, U. P. (2010). Mitigasi. Bandung:
http://p2mb.geografi.upi.edu/Mitigasi_Bencana.html.
Retrieved from
http://p2mb.geografi.upi.edu/Mitigasi_Bencana.html
Amri, A., Bird, D. K., Ronan, K., Haynes, K., & Towers, B. (2017). Disaster risk reduction
education in Indonesia :
challenges and recommendations for scaling up, 2015, 595–612.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-595-2017 Barreto, M., Mendonca, D., Rosa, S., & Rosa, A.
(2019). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Transversal integration of geohydrological risks in an elementary school in Brazil : A disaster education
experiment. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39(June), 101213.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101213
Chou, J., Yang, K., & Ren, T. (2015). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction Ex-post
evaluation of preparedness education in disaster prevention , mitigation and response.
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.002
Hoffmann, R., & Muttarak, R. (2017). Learn from the Past , Prepare for the Future : Impacts of
Education and Experience on Disaster Preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand. World
Development, xx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016
Husna, C. (2011). Influencing Factors on Disaster Preparedness in RSUDZA Banda Aceh Cut
Husna. Idea Nursing Journal.
Jeannette Sutton and Kathleen Tierney. (2006). Disaster Preparedness: Concepts, Guidance, and Research.
Colorado: Report prepared for the Fritz Institute Assessing Disaster Preparedness Conference
Sebastopol,
California, November 3 and 4, 2006.
Kamil, P. A., Utaya, S., & Utomo, D. H. (2019). Improving disaster knowledge within high school students through
geographic literacy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101411
Lai, C., & Tang, T. (2018). From Information Behaviors to Disaster Preparedness: Navigating
Individuals’ General
and Disaster Curation in U.S., China, and Australia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.023
Lin, P. S., & Chang, K. (2019). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Metamorphosis from local knowledge to involuted disaster knowledge for disaster
governance in a landslide-prone tribal community in Taiwan. International Journal of
Disaster Risk Reduction, (xxxx), 101339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101339
Liou, S., Liu, H., Tsai, H., Chu, T., & Cheng, C. (2020). International Journal of Disaster Risk
Reduction Relationships between disaster nursing competence , anticipatory disaster
stress and motivation for disaster engagement. International Journal of Disaster Risk
Reduction, 47, 101545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101545
Meissner, H., Creswell, J., Klassen, A. C., Plano, V., & Smith, K. C. (n.d.). Best Practices for
Mixed Methods
Research in the Health Sciences.
Muñoz, V. A., Carby, B., Abella, E. C., Dario, O., López-marrero, T., Marchezini, V., … Wisner,
B. (2019).
Success , Innovation and Challenge : Introduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101395.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101395
Naja, T., Mohammad, J., Haghani, H., & Javadi, N. (2019). Nurse Education Today E ff ect of
education using the virtual social network on the knowledge and attitude of emergency
nurses of disaster preparedness : A quasi- experiment study, 73(November 2018), 88–93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.001
Nasional, B., & Bencana, P. (2018). DITERBITKAN OLEH : Badan Nasional Penanggulangan
Bencana 1.
Nurkartika, D., Murakami, A., & Chagan-yasutan, H. (2017). International Journal of Disaster Risk
Reduction Integrated health education in disaster risk reduction : Lesson learned from disease
outbreak following natural disasters in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk
Reduction, (July), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.013
Ozkazanc, S., & Duman, U. (2015). Evaluation of disaster awareness and sensitivity level
of higher education students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,
197(February), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.168
Sakurai, A., Sato, T., & Murayama, Y. (2020). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Impact evaluation of a school-based disaster education program in a city affected by the
2011 great East Japan earthquake and tsunami disaster. International Journal of Disaster
Risk Reduction, 47(March), 101632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101632
Shoji, M., Takafuji, Y., & Harada, T. (2020). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Behavioral impact of disaster education : Evidence from a dance-based program in
Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 45(January), 101489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101489
Tanaka, K. (2005). The impact of disaster education on public preparation and mitigation for
earthquakes : a cross- country comparison between Fukui , Japan and the San Francisco Bay
Area , 25, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.07.001
Teo, M., Goonetilleke, A., Deilami, K., Ahankoob, A., & Lawie, M. (2019). International Journal
of Disaster Risk
Reduction Engaging residents from di ff erent ethnic and language backgrounds in disaster
preparedness. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39(July), 101245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101245
Theophilus Yanuarto, Sridewanto Pinuji, Andri Cipto Utomo, Ignatius, T. S. (2018). Buku saku Tanggap Tangkas
Tangguh Menghadapi Bencana. (Theophilus Yanuarto, Ed.). Jakarta: Pusat data Informasi dan Humas BNPB.
Retrieved from BNPB.go.id
Tsai, M., Chang, Y., Shiau, S., & Wang, S. (2019). Exploring the effects of a serious game-
based learning package for disaster prevention education: The case of Battle of Flooding
Protection. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 101393.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101393
Wu, X., Wang, Z., Gao, G., Guo, J., & Xue, P. (2019). Jo ur na of. Science of the Total Environment, 135888.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135888
Biographies
Rita Retnowati is a senior lecturer in the graduate program in environmental management and
responsible for courses in biology. Currently holder of the research chair in the field of
environmental education and the field of education for disaster mitigation,
Lufty Hari Susanto is a lecturer in the study program on the teaching of Biology, Faculty of
Teaching and Education, Pakuan University. Education and public education sector, with a
concentration of environmental knowledge and disaster mitigation.
Ekamilasari graduated in biology education from Pakuan University with honors in 2019.
Ekamilasari is currently continuing his studies in the master's program in natural sciences,
postgraduate program, University of Pakuan.
Abdul Talib Bon is a professor of Production and Operations Management in the Faculty of Technology
Management and Business at the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia since 1999. He has a PhD in Computer
Science, which he obtained from the Universite de La Rochelle, France in the year 2008. His doctoral thesis
was on topic Process Quality Improvement on Beltline Moulding Manufacturing. He studied Business
Administration in the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for which he was awarded the MBA in the year 1998.
He’s bachelor degree and diploma in Mechanical Engineering which his obtained from the Universiti
Teknologi Malaysia. He received his postgraduate certificate in Mechatronics and Robotics from Carlisle,
United Kingdom in 1997. He had published more 150 International Proceedings and International Journals and
8 books. He is a member of MSORSM, IIF, IEOM, IIE, INFORMS, TAM and MIM.
Original Article
journals.sagepub.com/home/son
Abstract
Objective: This study examined disaster nursing knowledge and competencies among university
nursing students who participated in relief activities following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes.
Methods: Participants were university nursing students involved in disaster relief activities. Of the
260 individuals to whom a self-report questionnaire was distributed at nursing universities and
hospitals located in Kyushu, southwestern Japan, 201 participants returned the questionnaires by
mail (response rate 77.3%), of which 108 questionnaires were complete (valid response rate
41.5%). Questions involved experiences related to their volunteer activities, their motive for
volunteering, type of relief activities performed, and use of disaster nursing knowledge and
competencies.
Results: We identified four categories of disaster nursing competencies: ‘‘understanding and
implementation of assistance to victims in collaboration with other members of the disaster
response team,’’ ‘‘understanding the natural disaster’s influence on victims,’’ ‘‘ethical practice in a
disaster recovery area,’’ and ‘‘understanding of their role within the disaster relief organ- ization.’’
Those who had completed a disaster nursing program had superior measures of performance
across all four competencies compared with those who had not yet completed the program.
Conclusions: Four domains of disaster nursing knowledge and competencies used by university
nursing students during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake relief activities were identified. Those who
had completed a disaster nursing program had higher competencies than were those who were
either currently or not yet enrolled in it.
Keywords
disaster nursing, competency, nursing student, disaster relief
Date received: 8 May 2018; accepted: 13 September 2018
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
Non- Commercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distri-
bution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages
(https:// us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Satoh et 2
al.
Methods
Design and Participants
A cross-sectional study design was
employed. Participants were recruited
from among those who par- ticipated in
volunteer disaster relief activities while
they were university nursing students
after the Kumamoto earthquakes. In July
2017, participants were recruited using
available sampling from three university
nursing programs located in Kyushu—
the most southwesterly of Japan’s
Relief activities in Kumamoto. We assessed
the relief activ- ities that student
volunteers engaged in using a 17-item
questionnaire based on previous research
(Kotera et al., 2016; Nakajima et al.,
2013; Sakai et al., 2016). Items included
‘‘removed rubble,’’ ‘‘promoted
exchange among local residents,’’ and
‘‘performed health checks.’’
Participants were asked to select all
applicable response options.
Statistical Analysis
First, we calculated descriptive statistics for
experience related to disaster volunteering,
reason for participating in disaster volunteer
activities in Kumamoto, relief activ- ities in
Kumamoto, and participants’ characteristics.
Second, we performed item analysis to
examine the item distributions and internal
consistency. Third, we conducted an
exploratory factor analysis to assess the
factor structure of disaster nursing
knowledge and com- petencies among
nursing students. We used unweighted least
squares with an oblique rotation method. The
factor loadings above the .3 cutoff were
acceptable. Finally, to compare the disaster
nursing knowledge and competencies scores
by enrolment status in a disaster nursing
program, we performed an analysis of
variance. SPSS Statistics 24.0 for Mac was
used for the data ana- lysis. Statistical
significance was set at p < .05 (two- tailed).
Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the ethics
committee of the authors’ institutions (No.
29-13). Written permission was obtained
from the participating universities and hos-
pitals. Participants were informed of the
voluntary
nature of participation in the study,
assured of their right to refuse to Reason for Participating in Disaster Volunteer
participate or withdraw at any time, and Activities in Kumamoto
assured of confidentiality during handling As shown in Table 3, more than half of
and dissemin- ation of obtained data. the participants agreed strongly with the
statements ‘‘I would like to sup- port
earthquake victims’’ (62.0%) or ‘‘I
Results
would like to engage in reconstruction
Participants’ Characteristics support activities in affected areas’’
(53.7%). Half of respondents (50.0%)
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, 88.9% of answered ‘‘strongly agree’’ or ‘‘agree’’
the 108 university nursing students in the in response to ‘‘I would like to use the
sample were women. Most respondents knowledge and skills I’ve gained as a
were freshmen and juniors (both 36.4%), nursing student.’’
while seniors composed 22.4% of the
sample at the time the Kumamoto Disaster Nursing Knowledge and Competencies
earthquakes occurred. In total, 84.0% of
students had previous volunteer Among Nursing Students
experience, 57.4% answered ‘‘one time’’ Table 4 shows the item distribution of
when asked about the fre- quency of their disaster nursing knowledge and
disaster volunteer activities in competencies among university nursing
Kumamoto, 41.7% of students had students. While floor effects were not
completed a disaster nursing program, found, ceiling effects were found on four
and 38.0% had not completed it yet. items: ‘‘I was able to make efforts to
Table 2 presents the ranking of the protect personal information,’’ ‘‘I was
relief activities that volunteer students able to secure my own safety,’’ ‘‘I was
engaged in within the affected area able to take care of my own health,’’ and
(multiple answers). The most common ‘‘I was able to take necessary precau-
activity was dis- tribution of relief tions to prevent contracting an infection
supplies (39.8%). Other common activ- considering the circumstances in the
ities included serving as a conversation affected area.’’ After excluding those
partner with affected people (36.6%), four items, exploratory factor analysis
sorting relief supplies (35.5%), and was per- formed on the remaining 34
maintaining the evacuation center items. As one item showed less than 0.3
(30.1%). factor loading and 11 items had higher
than
0.3 factor loadings onto two factors,
Table 1. Sample Characteristics.
these items were excluded. Next, four
factors were extracted, which were
N % ‘‘understanding and implementation of
assistance to vic- tims in collaboration
Sex with other members of the disaster
response team,’’ ‘‘understanding of the
Female 96 88.9 natural disaster’s
Male 12 11.1
Table 2. Relief Activities that Student Volunteers Performed.
Freshman 39 36.4 N %
Sophomore 5 4.7
Distributing relief supplies 37 39.8
Junior 39 36.4
Conversational partner with affected people 34 36.6
Senior 24 22.4
Sorting of relief supplies 33 35.5
revious volunteer experience Maintaining evacuation centers 28 30.1
P Yes 89 84.0
Removing rubble 27 29.0
No 17 16.0
Cleaning up houses 24 25.8
Serving hot meals 20 21.5
Frequency of involvement in volunteer disaster relief activities in
Kumamoto
Note. Some percentages do not equal 100% because of missing Note. Multiple response choices.
data.
Table 3. Reason for Volunteering for Disaster Relief
Volunteer in Kumamoto. Disaster Nursing Knowledge and Competencies
by Learning State of Implementation of Disaster
N % Nursing
To compare the disaster nursing
knowledge and compe-
I would like to support earthquake victims I was required to participate in relief activities
as part of class or club activities
Strongly disagree 0 0.0
Disagree 2 1.9 Strongly disagree 98 90.7
Agree 39 36.1 Disagree 9 8.3
Strongly agree 67 62.0 Agree 1 0.9
I would like to engage in reconstruction support Strongly agree 0 0.0
activities in affected areas Note. Some percentages do not equal 100% because of
missing data.
Strongly disagree 0 0.0
Disagree 5 4.6
influence on victims,’’ ‘‘ethical
Agree 45 41.7 practice in a disaster recovery area,’’
and ‘‘understanding of my role within
Strongly agree 58 53.7 the disaster relief organization.’’
My friends asked me to take part in disaster relief
Each factor had a Cronbach’s a 5 .
volunteering Strongly disagree 18 16.7 70.
Disagree 24 22.2
Agree 46 42.6
Disagree 16 14.8
Agree 3 2.8
Discussion
The main findings of our study can be
summarized as follows. The motives of
many participants for their par- ticipation in
disaster relief activities were their willing-
ness to support the victims, to engage in
reconstruction support activities in affected
areas, and to use the know- ledge and skills
they had gained as nursing students. These
results are consistent with those of previous
stu- dies (Chan et al., 2010; Yonge,
Rosychuk, Bailey, Lake, & Marrie, 2010).
The academic level at which students
complete a disaster nursing program and
whether the program is compulsory or
elective varied by university, with around
40% of respondents not having taken the
program despite having a strong interest in
disaster relief volunteering.
Although 50.0% reported a desire to use
acquired nursing knowledge and skills in the
affected area, many participants engaged in
activities that required no nur- sing
knowledge or skills. Because they were
nursing stu- dents without nursing
certification, it is possible that they were
viewed as unable to independently perform
profes- sional tasks. Last, the four domains
of nursing students’ disaster nursing
competencies that were identified in this
study are consistent in part with the disaster
nursing competencies released by the ICN or
identified by University of Hyogo COE.
Various health professionals,
governmental organiza- tions, private
organizations, and volunteers are involved in
disaster relief activities. Each must
Table 4. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Disaster Nursing Competencies Among Nursing Students.
I II III IV
Understanding and implementation of assistance to victims in collaboration with other disaster response
team members (α ¼ .918)
18 I was able to asses nursing care needs and .891 —.197 —.005 .071
collect information based on victims
circumstances
.869 —.072 .045 —.159
24 I was able to provide information about victims’
physical and psychological health problems to
other medical professionals
20 I was able to assess nursing care needs based .797 —.133 .053 .093
on developmental stage
15 I was able to understand the changing of victims’ .150 .740 —.070 —.214
living conditions
32 I was able to recognize how to support victims’ .063 .398 .219 —.002
daily living according to their health needs
1 I was able to protect victims’ human dignity and rights .003 —.016 .993 .027
2 I was able to treat victims ethically .057 .073 .818 0.020
Understanding my role within the disaster relief organization (α ¼ .767)
9 I was able to understand the roles of disaster —.015 —.017 —.014 .848
volunteer organizations
8 I was able to tell others engaged in relief activities .010 —.010 .083 .706
about how I could assist in disaster relief
I II III
Completed Currently enrolled Nnot yet enrolled
N ¼ 45 N ¼ 22 N ¼ 41
Post hoc
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) F p (Tukey)
Understanding and implementa- 30.82 (6.92) 25.5 (8.06) 26.13 (8.67) 5.12 .007** I–
tion of assistance to victims in II*
collaboration with other dis- I–
aster response team members III*
Understanding of natural disas- 25.24 (3.17) 21.27 (5.12) 22.45 (3.66) 9.90 .000*** I–
ters’ influence on victims II***
I–
III**
Ethical practice in a disaster 8.55 (1.46) 7.14 (2.27) 8.02 (1.60) 5.11 .008** I–II**
recovery area
Understanding of their role 7.36 (1.46) 7.27 (2.31) 7.05 (1.90) .32 .720 I–II*
within the disaster relief
organization
Conclusion
Our research identified four domains of
disaster nursing knowledge and
competencies used by university nursing
Author Contributions Management & Response, 3, 80–85.
M. S., H. I., E. Y., and Y. K. contributed to the concept Kashiwaba, E., & Okudera, M. (2014). Effectiveness of
and design of this study; M. S., H. I., Y. K., T. Y-M., and disaster volunteer training as part of basic nursing
Y. Y. contributed to data acquisition; M. S. carried out education. Bulletin of the Faculty of Social Welfare,
the statistical analysis, and drafted and completed Iwate Prefectural University, 16, 1–9.
the manuscript; H. I. and
Kobayashi, K., Shirakawa, Y., & Tatishi, S. (2014). An anat-
E. Y. contributed to interpretation of data and omy of educational impacts toward university students by
critically reviewed the manuscript; all authors read dis- aster-related volunteer experiences [Internet].
and approved the final manuscript.
Retrieved from http://ir.lib.hiroshima-
u.ac.jp/files/public/3/36500/
20150106145129818904/RIHE126.pdf.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflict of
interest with respect to the research, authorship,
and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the
research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
References
Al Thobaity, A., Plummer, V., & Williams, B. (2017).
What are the most common domains of the core
competencies of dis- aster nursing? A scoping
review. International Emergency Nursing, 31, 64–
71.
Chan, S. S., Chan, W. S., Cheng, Y., Fung, O. W., Lai, T. K.,
Loke, A. Y., & Fung, O. W. M. (2014). Nurses’ competen- cies in disaster nursing: Implications for curriculum
development and public health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 3289–3303.
Matsumoto, S., Takahira, S., Katahono, K., Yoshida, E., & Utsumi, A. (2006). Construction of disaster nursing in basic
nursing education: Survey of disaster nursing education in nursing university and future prospect to build disaster
nur- sing. Journal of the Faculty of Nursing and Nutrition Siebold University of Nagasaki, 7, 53–60.
Nakajima, K., Owatari, K., & Okumura, J. (2013). Study of the nursing students in the volunteer activities at the
temporary houses. Bulletin of Japanese Red Cross Toyota College of Nursing, 8, 41–46.
Noguchi, K., Katsuhara, Y., Suzuki, E., Banjo, C., Williamson, A., Ozasa, Y., . .. ;Hosomi, A. (2017). Ethical issues
recognized by disaster relief nurses dispatched in the disaster area of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Journal of
Japanese Nursing Ethics, 9, 38–44.
Ojima, T., & Volunteer Research Group (2008). Role of non- professional volunteers in disaster response. Journal of the
National Institute of Public Health, 57, 245–251.
Pattillo, M. M., & O’Day, T. M. (2009). Disaster response: The University of Texas School of Nursing experience.
Nursing & Health Sciences, 11, 378–381.
Sakai, Y., Maruyama, T., Matsuo, K., Okuno, Y., Kaneda, T., Aoki, N., . . . ;Morinaka, K. (2016). Learning of the
student who participated in off-campus volunteer enterprise. The report from the reconstruction assistance
volunteer study tour after the Great East Japan Earthquake. The second news. Bulletin of Fukuoka Jo Gakuin
University, 6, 11–17.
Sakihama, K. (2017). Toward co-existence between victims and disaster volunteers. Tokyo, Japan: Impress R&D.
Sawada, Y., Kojo, S., Nakayama, A., & Tsugeno, H. (2015). Disaster nursing education program in nursing university. Bulletin
of Niimi College, 36, 21–26.
Schmidt, C. K., Davis, J. M., Sanders, J. L., Chapman, L. A., Cisco, M. C., & Hady, A. R. (2011). Exploring nursing stu- dents’ level
of preparedness for disaster response. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32, 380–383.
Tomizawa, Y., Onogi, H., Sugawara, N., Sugiyama, T., Sugawara, C., Kawamura, M., .. . ;Kadoya, K. (2014). Nursing students’
learning through volunteer activities after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Bulletin of Tohoku Fukushi University, 38,
199–220.
University of Hyogo, The 21st Century Center of Excellence Program. (2006). Core competencies required for disaster nursing.
Hyogo, Japan: University of Hyogo College of Nursing Art and Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.coe-
cnas.jp/english/group_education/core_competencies_list. html.
Usher, K., & Mayner, L. (2010). Disaster nursing: A descrip- tive survey of Australian undergraduate nursing curricula.
Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, 14, 75–80.
Wenji, Z., Turale, S., Stone, T., & Petrini, M. A. (2015). Chinese nurses’ relief experiences following two earth- quakes:
Implications for disaster education and policy development. Nurse Education in Practice, 15, 75–81. doi:
10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.011.
World Health Organization & International Council of Nurses. (2009). ICN framework of disaster nursing competencies. Geneva,
Switzerland: International Council of Nurses.
Yamamoto, A. (2013). Development of disaster nursing in Japan, and trends of disaster nursing in the world. Japan Journal
of Nursing Science, 10, 162–169.
Yonge, O., Rosychuk, R. J., Bailey, T. M., Lake, R., & Marrie,
T. J. (2010). Willingness of university nursing students to volunteer during a pandemic. Public Health Nursing, 27, 174–
180.
Yoshihara, M., Ide, W., & Makioka, S. (2012). Survey of the Great East Japan Earthquake reconstruction volunteer experience
among university students [Internet]. Retrieved from http://www.kodaikyo.org/110311/qresults.pdf.
Original Article
Abstract
Objective: This study examined disaster nursing knowledge and competencies among university nursing students who
participated in relief activities following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes.
Methods: Participants were university nursing students involved in disaster relief activities. Of the 260 individuals to
whom a self-report questionnaire was distributed at nursing universities and hospitals located in Kyushu, southwestern
Japan, 201 participants returned the questionnaires by mail (response rate 77.3%), of which 108 questionnaires were
complete (valid response rate 41.5%). Questions involved experiences related to their volunteer activities, their motive
for volunteering, type of relief activities performed, and use of disaster nursing knowledge and competencies.
Results: We identified four categories of disaster nursing competencies: ‘‘understanding and implementation of
assistance to victims in collaboration with other members of the disaster response team,’’ ‘‘understanding the natural
disaster’s influence on victims,’’ ‘‘ethical practice in a disaster recovery area,’’ and ‘‘understanding of their role within
the disaster relief organ- ization.’’ Those who had completed a disaster nursing program had superior measures of
performance across all four competencies compared with those who had not yet completed the program.
Conclusions: Four domains of disaster nursing knowledge and competencies used by university nursing students
during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake relief activities were identified. Those who had completed a disaster nursing
program had higher competencies than were those who were either currently or not yet enrolled in it.
Keywords
disaster nursing, competency, nursing student, disaster relief
Disaster relief volunteers can be loosely area, and experience level. The aforementioned
classified into two groups: expert volunteers (i.e., defin- itions of competencies released by the ICN
those who have pro- fessional knowledge, skills, are for gen- eralist nurses and do not apply to
or certification) and nonex- pert volunteers nursing students. For nursing students, there is
(Sakihama, 2017). Coordination of disaster relief neither a general concept of their competencies
volunteers based on their skills and attri- butes nor a specific concept relating to disaster relief
would lead to efficient, effective, and highly nursing competencies.
mobile relief activities in the affected areas Nursing students are expected to play an
(Ojima & Volunteer Research Group, 2008). important role in health-care delivery during
Because the need for health-care services disaster response as they gain increasing
increases fol- lowing natural disasters, securing professional knowledge and skills. However, their
medical professionals and paraprofessionals to knowledge and skills specifically in disas- ter
assist in the recovery process is critical. Nurses nursing, understanding of nurses’ roles during
compose a large portion of the overall population disas- ters, and knowledge of disaster
of health-care professionals and they play preparedness are inadequate. They also lack
prominent roles in disaster relief (World Health experience in disaster drills, and their level of
Organization & International Council of Nurses, competencies will vary by duration of academic
2009). Many nurses are actively involved in training (Cusack et al., 2010; Jennings- Sanders,
disaster relief activ- ities as expert volunteers. Frisch, & Wing, 2005; Schmidt et al., 2011).
Nursing students could also play a significant role Despite these limitations, nursing students could
in volunteer disaster relief activities (Cusack, be key responders in the event of natural
Arbon, & Ranse, 2010), bringing invaluable disasters. Therefore, research is needed to
knowledge and skills as trained professionals examine the professional compe- tencies and
that could help fill expert volunteer roles in the knowledge they can contribute during disas- ter
aftermath of a disaster. Previous research response. The findings would contribute to
reported that nursing stu- dents provided improving disaster nursing education program for
assistance such as observation of physical and nursing students and to examining measures for
psychological health, hygiene promotion, foot the appropriate alloca- tion of nursing student
bath- ing, and health consultation at the scene of volunteers in the event of natural disasters.
natural dis- asters (Cusack et al., 2010; Tomizawa This study sought to identify the disaster
et al., 2014). They used acquired knowledge and nursing knowledge and competencies among
skills when engaging in disaster relief (Kashiwaba university nursing students who participated in
& Okudera, 2014), and it has been suggested relief activities following the 2016 Kumamoto
that they could assist qualified nur- sing personnel earthquakes.
in such situations because of their knowledge and
skill in nursing, problem-solving and cri- tical-
thinking skills, and interpersonal skills
(Nakajima, Owatari, & Okumura, 2013). Methods
Competency is typically defined as ‘‘an Design and Participants
underlying characteristic of a person which is
causally related to effective or superior A cross-sectional study design was employed.
performance in a job or role’’ (Evarts, 1987, p.3). Participants were recruited from among those
In nursing domains, competencies are defined as who par- ticipated in volunteer disaster relief
‘‘a level of performance demonstrating the activities while they were university nursing
effective application of knowledge, skill and students after the Kumamoto earthquakes. In July
judge- ment’’ (International Council of Nurses 2017, participants were recruited using available
[ICN], 1997, p.44). Competencies are viewed as a sampling from three university nursing programs
reflection of a range of skills (cognitive, located in Kyushu—the most southwesterly of
technical or psychomotor, and interpersonal), as Japan’s main islands, and the island on which
well as a range of personal attributes and attitudes Kumamoto is located. Assuming that students
(Alexander & Runciman, 2003). The ICN who were in their fourth year at the time of the
established the conceptual framework of earthquake would already be practicing nurses,
competencies specific to the context of disaster we also asked for cooperation from hospitals in
relief in line with the ICN’s definition of the Kyushu with over 400 beds using available
nursing competencies and the existing literature sampling. The reason why avail- able sampling
(Hutton, Veenema, & Gebbie, 2016; World was employed was that as Kumamoto is located
Health Organization & International Council of in Kyushu, a lot of nursing university students in
Nurses, 2009). These competencies reflect the Kyushu area were assumed to take part in relief
specialized role and activities of nurses in disaster activities following the 2016 Kumamoto
relief efforts. earthquakes. After obtaining written consent to
Competencies are promoted by education and participate from these facil- ities, anonymous self-
train- ing program and clinical experience. Thus, report questionnaires were distrib- uted to 260
expected competencies will vary by level of individuals through the universities and hospitals.
education, practice Of these, 201 individuals responded by mail
Relief activities in Kumamoto. We assessed the relief
activ- ities that student volunteers engaged in
using a 17-item questionnaire based on previous
research (Kotera et al., 2016; Nakajima et al.,
2013; Sakai et al., 2016). Items included
‘‘removed rubble,’’ ‘‘promoted exchange among
local residents,’’ and ‘‘performed health
checks.’’ Participants were asked to select all
applicable response options.
I II III IV
Understanding and implementation of assistance to victims in collaboration with other disaster response
team members (α ¼ .918)
18 I was able to asses nursing care needs and .891 —.197 —.005 .071
collect information based on victims
circumstances .869 —.072 .045 —.159
24 I was able to provide information about victims’
physical and psychological health problems to
other medical professionals .797 —.133 .053 .093
20 I was able to assess nursing care needs based
on developmental stage
.724 .061 .123 —.135
22 I was able to understand the importance of
identifying victims in need of support at early
stages and col- laborate with other specialized
.722 .041 .022 .027
organizations
27 I was able to seamlessly collaborate with people
.680 .216 —.093 —.009
from other professions involved in relief
activities
.664 .116 .025 —.025
26 I was able to recognize the roles of other people
and professionals involved in relief activities
.662 .083 —.106 .152
14 I was able to understand the roles of nurses and
their tasks for victims’ support
.387 .282 —.109 .177
17 I was able to collect needed information depending
on victims’ situations
36 I was able to inform responders that I performed
dis- aster volunteer activities .020 .839 —.126 .092
Understanding natural disasters’ influence on victims (α ¼ .
862) —.178 .818 .125 —.015
16 I was able to understand the changing needs of
victims’ health —.102 .773 .065 .112
30 I was able to understand the necessity of
maintaining living environments to promote .150 .740 —.070 —.214
health
15 I was able to understand the changing of victims’ .260 .440 .101 .048
living conditions
23 I was able to understand the impact of .063 .398 .219 —.002
disasters on psychological and physical
health
32 I was able to recognize how to support victims’
daily living according to their health needs
34 I was able to understand the resources needed by
those in need of support during disasters
Ethical practice in a disaster recovery area (α ¼ .939)
3 I was able to protect victims’ human dignity and rights .003 —.016 .993 .027
4 I was able to treat victims ethically .057 .073 .818 0.020
Understanding my role within the disaster relief organization (α ¼ .767)
9 I was able to understand the roles of disaster —.015 —.017 —.014 .848
volunteer organizations
8 I was able to tell others engaged in relief activities .010 —.010 .083 .706
about how I could assist in disaster relief
student, could possess such competencies and community residents’ overall health and daily
use them during disaster volunteer activities.
This survey identified ‘‘understanding of the
natural disaster’s influence on victims’’ among
university nursing students. Nurses also must
understand the impact of dis- asters on
living conditions, as well as the support they
need. They must then provide rapid and
appropriate care for victims (World Health
Organization & International Council of Nurses,
2009). As previous papers have suggested
(Cusack et al., 2010), it is reasonable to assume
that uni- versity nursing students acquire such
knowledge and
Table 5. Disaster Nursing Knowledge and Competencies by Enrolment Status in a Disaster Nursing Program.
I II III
Completed Currently enrolled Nnot yet enrolled
N ¼ 45 N ¼ 22 N ¼ 41
Post hoc
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) F p (Tukey)
Understanding and implementa- 30.82 25.5 (8.06) 26.13 (8.67) 5.12 .007** I–II*
(6.92) tion of assistance to victims in I–III*
collaboration with other dis-
aster response team members
Understanding of natural disas- 25.24 21.27 (5.12) 22.45 (3.66) 9.90 .000*** I–II***
(3.17) ters’ influence on victims I–III**
Ethical practice in a disaster 8.55 7.14 (2.27) 8.02 (1.60) 5.11 .008** I–II**
(1.46) recovery area
Understanding of their role 7.36 (1.46) 7.27 (2.31) 7.05 (1.90) .32 .720 I–II*
within the disaster relief
organization
Note. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Tukey test.
***p <.001, **p <.01, *p <.05.
competencies through standard nursing education, relief activities (Al Thobaity et al., 2017; World
including nursing skills, nursing processes, and Health Organization & International Council of
practical nursing training. Nurses, 2009) as they could promote smooth
Disaster responders are required to protect coordination among health-care professionals.
victims’ human dignity and rights while adhering University nursing students who are capable of
to ethical and moral principles (Davis, 2014; understanding their own abilities and roles in
World Health Organization & International disaster situations could be important sup- porters
Council of Nurses, 2009). Nurses may face during disaster responses.
ethical problems that conflict with usual Participants who had completed a disaster
emergency nursing case, difficulties respecting nursing program showed better understanding and
victims’ privacy, and unimaginable patient care implementa- tion of assistance to victims in
decisions in times of scarce resources and collaboration with other disaster response team
supplies (Davis, 2014; Noguchi et al., 2017). members, better understanding of the natural
Most nursing students learn nur- sing ethics in the disaster’s influence on victims, more ethical
early stages of university-based train- ing. As practice in a disaster recovery area, and better
more than 60% of our sample were in their under- standing of their role within the disaster
sophomore year or beyond, they had been trained relief organiza- tion. Past studies claimed that
to behave ethically and legally. In regards to first- disaster nursing classes imparted knowledge
year stu- dents, they may potentially possess applicable to disaster volunteer activities (Pattillo
competencies of respecting human rights and & O’Day, 2009). In the disaster nur- sing
giving consideration to eth- ical concerns because education program commonly found in Japanese
they were interested in nursing fields and took universities, many aspects of disaster nursing are
part in disaster relief activities. Thus, university pre- sented. They include the influence of natural
nursing students could utilize the competency of disasters on health, information collection and
‘‘ethical practice in a disaster recovery area’’ assessment in affected areas, nurses’ roles and
during disaster volunteer activities. responsibilities in disas- ter situations, ethical
This study found that university nursing problems during treatment, and multidisciplinary
students involved in disaster relief might have an collaboration during disaster response
‘‘understanding of their role within the disaster (Matsumoto, Takahira, Katahono, Yoshida, &
relief organization.’’ This would indicate that Utsumi, 2006; Sawada, Kojo, Nakayama, &
they have the autonomy and self- expression Tsugeno, 2015; Yamamoto, 2013). However, we
required when participating in volunteer did not ask about the contents of the disaster
activities. Nurses must understand their own roles nursing programs the partici- pants took. Further
accur- ately, be able to adapt their knowledge, research is needed to examine the effect of
skills, and abil- ities for the disaster situation, and undergraduate disaster nursing education on
inform other disaster responders of what they can performance of disaster relief activities.
do to help. Competencies such as this are critical This study found that our participants were
for effective and efficient disaster equipped with competencies similar to those
required of nurses
engaging in disaster response. These Author Contributions
competencies may be gained through
undergraduate nursing education pro- grams. In M. S., H. I., E. Y., and Y. K. contributed to the concept
addition, classes in disaster nursing could con- and design of this study; M. S., H. I., Y. K., T. Y-M.,
and Y. Y. contributed to data acquisition; M. S. carried
tribute to nursing students’ ability to assist in out the statistical analysis, and drafted and completed
disaster relief. It is recommended that a unified the manuscript; H. I. and
disaster nursing education curriculum be E. Y. contributed to interpretation of data and critically
established that promotes com- petencies to reviewed the manuscript; all authors read and approved
flexibly apply students’ knowledge and skills in the final manuscript.
the context of disaster relief. A nursing education
pro- gram based on the framework of ICN Declaration of Conflicting Interests
disaster nursing competencies had superior The author(s) declared no potential conflict of
educational effects for nur- sing students (Chan et interest with respect to the research, authorship,
al., 2010). Adapting this program for university and/or publication of this article.
nursing students in Japan is desirable.
Identifying disaster nursing competencies used Funding
by uni- versity nursing students via this survey
The author(s) received no financial support for the
might make it possible to accurately assess research, authorship, and/or publication of this
nursing student volunteers’ capabilities and article.
allocate them optimally in disaster situations.
References
Limitations and Future Study Al Thobaity, A., Plummer, V., & Williams, B. (2017).
What are the most common domains of the core
As the results of this study were based on a cross- competencies of dis- aster nursing? A scoping
sectional design, no causal relationship could be review. International Emergency Nursing, 31, 64–
con- cluded between disaster nursing knowledge 71.
and competencies and student nurses’ motives to Alexander, M., & Runciman, P. (2003). ICN framework of
participate or enrolment status in a disaster competencies for the generalist nurse. Geneva,
nursing program. Future research using a Switzerland: International Council of Nurses.
longitudinal design is needed to identify and Chan, S. S., Chan, W. S., Cheng, Y., Fung, O. W., Lai, T.
examine causal relationships. These find- ings K.,
cannot be generalized because the data were col- Leung, A. W., .. . ;Pang, S. M. (2010). Development
lected exclusively from university nursing and evaluation of an undergraduate training course for
students in southwestern Japan who were develop- ing International Council of Nurses disaster
nursing com- petencies in China. Journal of Nursing
involved in relief activities following the 2016 Scholarship, 42, 405–413.
Kumamoto earthquakes, and our target sample Cusack, L., Arbon, P., & Ranse, J. (2010). What is the
might not accurately reflect the population of role of nursing students and schools of nursing
interest as this study employed available during disaster? A discussion paper. Collegian, 17,
sampling. In addition, the sample size may be too 193–197.
small, and further studies are needed to confirm Davis, A. J. (2014). Ethics needed for disasters: Before,
our results across a larger sample using during, and after. Health Emergency and Disaster Nursing,
probability sampling. 1, 11–18. Evarts, H. (1987). The competency programme
of the American Management Association.
Industrial and
Conclusion Commercial Training, 19, 3–7.
Hutton, A., Veenema, T. G., & Gebbie, K. (2016).
Our research identified four domains of disaster Review of the International Council of Nurses (ICN)
nursing knowledge and competencies used by framework of disaster nursing competencies.
university nursing students during relief activities Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 31, 680–683. doi:
following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake. Those 10.1017/S1049023X1600100X.
who had completed a dis- aster nursing program International Council of Nurses. (1997). ICN on
displayed greater understanding of providing regulation: Towards 21st century models. Geneva,
assistance to victims in collaboration with other Switzerland: Author. Jennings-Sanders, A., Frisch, N., &
disaster response team members and a better Wing, S. (2005). Nursing students’ perceptions about
disaster nursing. Disaster
understanding of natural disasters’ influence on
Management & Response, 3, 80–85.
victims. This group of respondents also had more
Kashiwaba, E., & Okudera, M. (2014). Effectiveness of
ethical practice in the affected area and a greater disaster volunteer training as part of basic nursing
understanding of their role within the disaster education. Bulletin of the Faculty of Social Welfare,
relief organization than those who were currently Iwate Prefectural University, 16, 1–9.
enrolled in the program. Kobayashi, K., Shirakawa, Y., & Tatishi, S. (2014). An
anat- omy of educational impacts toward university
Acknowledgments students by dis- aster-related volunteer experiences
[Internet]. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.hiroshima-
The authors would like to thank all participants in this u.ac.jp/files/public/3/36500/
study. 20150106145129818904/RIHE126.pdf.
Kotera, N., Ogasawara, Y., Nakagami, K., Koyano, H., Minoda, S., & Mizuno, S. (2016). The report of volunteer
activities of nursing students in Tohoku after the great east- ern Japan earthquake. Bulletin of Yokkaichi Nursing and
Medical Care University, 9, 51–59.
Loke, A. Y., & Fung, O. W. M. (2014). Nurses’ competen- cies in disaster nursing: Implications for curriculum
development and public health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 3289–3303.
Matsumoto, S., Takahira, S., Katahono, K., Yoshida, E., & Utsumi, A. (2006). Construction of disaster nursing in basic
nursing education: Survey of disaster nursing education in nursing university and future prospect to build disaster nur-
sing. Journal of the Faculty of Nursing and Nutrition Siebold University of Nagasaki, 7, 53–60.
Nakajima, K., Owatari, K., & Okumura, J. (2013). Study of the nursing students in the volunteer activities at the
temporary houses. Bulletin of Japanese Red Cross Toyota College of Nursing, 8, 41–46.
Noguchi, K., Katsuhara, Y., Suzuki, E., Banjo, C., Williamson, A., Ozasa, Y., . .. ;Hosomi, A. (2017). Ethical issues
recognized by disaster relief nurses dispatched in the disaster area of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Journal of
Japanese Nursing Ethics, 9, 38–44.
Ojima, T., & Volunteer Research Group (2008). Role of non- professional volunteers in disaster response. Journal of the
National Institute of Public Health, 57, 245–251.
Pattillo, M. M., & O’Day, T. M. (2009). Disaster response: The University of Texas School of Nursing experience.
Nursing & Health Sciences, 11, 378–381.
Sakai, Y., Maruyama, T., Matsuo, K., Okuno, Y., Kaneda, T., Aoki, N., . . . ;Morinaka, K. (2016). Learning of the
student who participated in off-campus volunteer enterprise. The report from the reconstruction assistance
volunteer study tour after the Great East Japan Earthquake. The second news. Bulletin of Fukuoka Jo Gakuin
University, 6, 11–17.
Sakihama, K. (2017). Toward co-existence between victims and disaster volunteers. Tokyo, Japan: Impress R&D.
Sawada, Y., Kojo, S., Nakayama, A., & Tsugeno, H. (2015). Disaster nursing education program in nursing university.
Bulletin of Niimi College, 36, 21–26.
Schmidt, C. K., Davis, J. M., Sanders, J. L., Chapman, L. A., Cisco, M. C., & Hady, A. R. (2011). Exploring nursing stu-
dents’ level of preparedness for disaster response. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32, 380–383.
Tomizawa, Y., Onogi, H., Sugawara, N., Sugiyama, T., Sugawara, C., Kawamura, M., .. . ;Kadoya, K. (2014). Nursing
students’ learning through volunteer activities after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Bulletin of Tohoku Fukushi
University, 38, 199–220.
University of Hyogo, The 21st Century Center of Excellence Program. (2006). Core competencies required for disaster
nursing. Hyogo, Japan: University of Hyogo College of Nursing Art and Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.coe-
cnas.jp/english/group_education/core_competencies_list. html.
Usher, K., & Mayner, L. (2010). Disaster nursing: A descrip- tive survey of Australian undergraduate nursing curricula.
Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, 14, 75–80.
Wenji, Z., Turale, S., Stone, T., & Petrini, M. A. (2015). Chinese nurses’ relief experiences following two earth- quakes:
Implications for disaster education and policy development. Nurse Education in Practice, 15, 75–81. doi:
10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.011.
World Health Organization & International Council of Nurses. (2009). ICN framework of disaster nursing competencies.
Geneva, Switzerland: International Council of Nurses.
Yamamoto, A. (2013). Development of disaster nursing in Japan, and trends of disaster nursing in the world. Japan Journal of
Nursing Science, 10, 162–169.
Yonge, O., Rosychuk, R. J., Bailey, T. M., Lake, R., & Marrie,
T. J. (2010). Willingness of university nursing students to volunteer during a pandemic. Public Health Nursing, 27, 174–
180.
Yoshihara, M., Ide, W., & Makioka, S. (2012). Survey of the Great East Japan Earthquake reconstruction volunteer experience
among university students [Internet]. Retrieved from http://www.kodaikyo.org/110311/qresults.pdf.
Original Article
journals.sagepub.com/home/son
Abstract
Objective: This study examined disaster nursing knowledge and competencies among university
nursing students who participated in relief activities following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes.
Methods: Participants were university nursing students involved in disaster relief activities. Of the
260 individuals to whom a self-report questionnaire was distributed at nursing universities and
hospitals located in Kyushu, southwestern Japan, 201 participants returned the questionnaires by
mail (response rate 77.3%), of which 108 questionnaires were complete (valid response rate
41.5%). Questions involved experiences related to their volunteer activities, their motive for
volunteering, type of relief activities performed, and use of disaster nursing knowledge and
competencies.
Results: We identified four categories of disaster nursing competencies: ‘‘understanding and
implementation of assistance to victims in collaboration with other members of the disaster
response team,’’ ‘‘understanding the natural disaster’s influence on victims,’’ ‘‘ethical practice in a
disaster recovery area,’’ and ‘‘understanding of their role within the disaster relief organ- ization.’’
Those who had completed a disaster nursing program had superior measures of performance
across all four competencies compared with those who had not yet completed the program.
Conclusions: Four domains of disaster nursing knowledge and competencies used by university
nursing students during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake relief activities were identified. Those who
had completed a disaster nursing program had higher competencies than were those who were
either currently or not yet enrolled in it.
Keywords
disaster nursing, competency, nursing student, disaster relief
Date received: 8 May 2018; accepted: 13 September 2018
Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
Non- Commercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distri-
bution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages
(https:// us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Satoh et 2
al.
Methods
Design and Participants
A cross-sectional study design was
employed. Participants were recruited
from among those who par- ticipated in
volunteer disaster relief activities while
they were university nursing students
after the Kumamoto earthquakes. In July
2017, participants were recruited using
available sampling from three university
nursing programs located in Kyushu—
the most southwesterly of Japan’s
Relief activities in Kumamoto. We assessed
the relief activ- ities that student
volunteers engaged in using a 17-item
questionnaire based on previous research
(Kotera et al., 2016; Nakajima et al.,
2013; Sakai et al., 2016). Items included
‘‘removed rubble,’’ ‘‘promoted
exchange among local residents,’’ and
‘‘performed health checks.’’
Participants were asked to select all
applicable response options.
Statistical Analysis
First, we calculated descriptive statistics for
experience related to disaster volunteering,
reason for participating in disaster volunteer
activities in Kumamoto, relief activ- ities in
Kumamoto, and participants’ characteristics.
Second, we performed item analysis to
examine the item distributions and internal
consistency. Third, we conducted an
exploratory factor analysis to assess the
factor structure of disaster nursing
knowledge and com- petencies among
nursing students. We used unweighted least
squares with an oblique rotation method. The
factor loadings above the .3 cutoff were
acceptable. Finally, to compare the disaster
nursing knowledge and competencies scores
by enrolment status in a disaster nursing
program, we performed an analysis of
variance. SPSS Statistics 24.0 for Mac was
used for the data ana- lysis. Statistical
significance was set at p < .05 (two- tailed).
Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the ethics
committee of the authors’ institutions (No.
29-13). Written permission was obtained
from the participating universities and hos-
pitals. Participants were informed of the
voluntary
nature of participation in the study,
assured of their right to refuse to Reason for Participating in Disaster Volunteer
participate or withdraw at any time, and Activities in Kumamoto
assured of confidentiality during handling As shown in Table 3, more than half of
and dissemin- ation of obtained data. the participants agreed strongly with the
statements ‘‘I would like to sup- port
earthquake victims’’ (62.0%) or ‘‘I
Results
would like to engage in reconstruction
Participants’ Characteristics support activities in affected areas’’
(53.7%). Half of respondents (50.0%)
As shown in Tables 1 and 2, 88.9% of answered ‘‘strongly agree’’ or ‘‘agree’’
the 108 university nursing students in the in response to ‘‘I would like to use the
sample were women. Most respondents knowledge and skills I’ve gained as a
were freshmen and juniors (both 36.4%), nursing student.’’
while seniors composed 22.4% of the
sample at the time the Kumamoto Disaster Nursing Knowledge and Competencies
earthquakes occurred. In total, 84.0% of
students had previous volunteer Among Nursing Students
experience, 57.4% answered ‘‘one time’’ Table 4 shows the item distribution of
when asked about the fre- quency of their disaster nursing knowledge and
disaster volunteer activities in competencies among university nursing
Kumamoto, 41.7% of students had students. While floor effects were not
completed a disaster nursing program, found, ceiling effects were found on four
and 38.0% had not completed it yet. items: ‘‘I was able to make efforts to
Table 2 presents the ranking of the protect personal information,’’ ‘‘I was
relief activities that volunteer students able to secure my own safety,’’ ‘‘I was
engaged in within the affected area able to take care of my own health,’’ and
(multiple answers). The most common ‘‘I was able to take necessary precau-
activity was dis- tribution of relief tions to prevent contracting an infection
supplies (39.8%). Other common activ- considering the circumstances in the
ities included serving as a conversation affected area.’’ After excluding those
partner with affected people (36.6%), four items, exploratory factor analysis
sorting relief supplies (35.5%), and was per- formed on the remaining 34
maintaining the evacuation center items. As one item showed less than 0.3
(30.1%). factor loading and 11 items had higher
than
0.3 factor loadings onto two factors,
Table 1. Sample Characteristics.
these items were excluded. Next, four
factors were extracted, which were
N % ‘‘understanding and implementation of
assistance to vic- tims in collaboration
Sex with other members of the disaster
response team,’’ ‘‘understanding of the
Female 96 88.9 natural disaster’s
Male 12 11.1
Table 2. Relief Activities that Student Volunteers Performed.
Freshman 39 36.4 N %
Sophomore 5 4.7
Distributing relief supplies 37 39.8
Junior 39 36.4
Conversational partner with affected people 34 36.6
Senior 24 22.4
Sorting of relief supplies 33 35.5
revious volunteer experience Maintaining evacuation centers 28 30.1
P Yes 89 84.0
Removing rubble 27 29.0
No 17 16.0
Cleaning up houses 24 25.8
Serving hot meals 20 21.5
Frequency of involvement in volunteer disaster relief activities in
Kumamoto
Note. Some percentages do not equal 100% because of missing Note. Multiple response choices.
data.
Table 3. Reason for Volunteering for Disaster Relief
Volunteer in Kumamoto. Disaster Nursing Knowledge and Competencies
by Learning State of Implementation of Disaster
N % Nursing
To compare the disaster nursing
knowledge and compe-
I would like to support earthquake victims I was required to participate in relief activities
as part of class or club activities
Strongly disagree 0 0.0
Disagree 2 1.9 Strongly disagree 98 90.7
Agree 39 36.1 Disagree 9 8.3
Strongly agree 67 62.0 Agree 1 0.9
I would like to engage in reconstruction support Strongly agree 0 0.0
activities in affected areas Note. Some percentages do not equal 100% because of
missing data.
Strongly disagree 0 0.0
Disagree 5 4.6
influence on victims,’’ ‘‘ethical
Agree 45 41.7 practice in a disaster recovery area,’’
and ‘‘understanding of my role within
Strongly agree 58 53.7 the disaster relief organization.’’
My friends asked me to take part in disaster relief
Each factor had a Cronbach’s a 5 .
volunteering Strongly disagree 18 16.7 70.
Disagree 24 22.2
Agree 46 42.6
Disagree 16 14.8
Agree 3 2.8
Discussion
The main findings of our study can be
summarized as follows. The motives of
many participants for their par- ticipation in
disaster relief activities were their willing-
ness to support the victims, to engage in
reconstruction support activities in affected
areas, and to use the know- ledge and skills
they had gained as nursing students. These
results are consistent with those of previous
stu- dies (Chan et al., 2010; Yonge,
Rosychuk, Bailey, Lake, & Marrie, 2010).
The academic level at which students
complete a disaster nursing program and
whether the program is compulsory or
elective varied by university, with around
40% of respondents not having taken the
program despite having a strong interest in
disaster relief volunteering.
Although 50.0% reported a desire to use
acquired nursing knowledge and skills in the
affected area, many participants engaged in
activities that required no nur- sing
knowledge or skills. Because they were
nursing stu- dents without nursing
certification, it is possible that they were
viewed as unable to independently perform
profes- sional tasks. Last, the four domains
of nursing students’ disaster nursing
competencies that were identified in this
study are consistent in part with the disaster
nursing competencies released by the ICN or
identified by University of Hyogo COE.
Various health professionals,
governmental organiza- tions, private
organizations, and volunteers are involved in
disaster relief activities. Each must
Table 4. Exploratory Factor Analysis of Disaster Nursing Competencies Among Nursing Students.
I II III IV
Understanding and implementation of assistance to victims in collaboration with other disaster response
team members (α ¼ .918)
18 I was able to asses nursing care needs and .891 —.197 —.005 .071
collect information based on victims
circumstances
.869 —.072 .045 —.159
24 I was able to provide information about victims’
physical and psychological health problems to
other medical professionals
20 I was able to assess nursing care needs based .797 —.133 .053 .093
on developmental stage
15 I was able to understand the changing of victims’ .150 .740 —.070 —.214
living conditions
32 I was able to recognize how to support victims’ .063 .398 .219 —.002
daily living according to their health needs
1 I was able to protect victims’ human dignity and rights .003 —.016 .993 .027
2 I was able to treat victims ethically .057 .073 .818 0.020
Understanding my role within the disaster relief organization (α ¼ .767)
9 I was able to understand the roles of disaster —.015 —.017 —.014 .848
volunteer organizations
8 I was able to tell others engaged in relief activities .010 —.010 .083 .706
about how I could assist in disaster relief
I II III
Completed Currently enrolled Nnot yet enrolled
N ¼ 45 N ¼ 22 N ¼ 41
Post hoc
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) F p (Tukey)
Understanding and implementa- 30.82 (6.92) 25.5 (8.06) 26.13 (8.67) 5.12 .007** I–
tion of assistance to victims in II*
collaboration with other dis- I–
aster response team members III*
Understanding of natural disas- 25.24 (3.17) 21.27 (5.12) 22.45 (3.66) 9.90 .000*** I–
ters’ influence on victims II***
I–
III**
Ethical practice in a disaster 8.55 (1.46) 7.14 (2.27) 8.02 (1.60) 5.11 .008** I–II**
recovery area
Understanding of their role 7.36 (1.46) 7.27 (2.31) 7.05 (1.90) .32 .720 I–II*
within the disaster relief
organization
Conclusion
Our research identified four domains of
disaster nursing knowledge and
competencies used by university nursing
Author Contributions Management & Response, 3, 80–85.
M. S., H. I., E. Y., and Y. K. contributed to the concept Kashiwaba, E., & Okudera, M. (2014). Effectiveness of
and design of this study; M. S., H. I., Y. K., T. Y-M., and disaster volunteer training as part of basic nursing
Y. Y. contributed to data acquisition; M. S. carried out education. Bulletin of the Faculty of Social Welfare,
the statistical analysis, and drafted and completed Iwate Prefectural University, 16, 1–9.
the manuscript; H. I. and
Kobayashi, K., Shirakawa, Y., & Tatishi, S. (2014). An anat-
E. Y. contributed to interpretation of data and omy of educational impacts toward university students by
critically reviewed the manuscript; all authors read dis- aster-related volunteer experiences [Internet].
and approved the final manuscript.
Retrieved from http://ir.lib.hiroshima-
u.ac.jp/files/public/3/36500/
20150106145129818904/RIHE126.pdf.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflict of
interest with respect to the research, authorship,
and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the
research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
References
Al Thobaity, A., Plummer, V., & Williams, B. (2017).
What are the most common domains of the core
competencies of dis- aster nursing? A scoping
review. International Emergency Nursing, 31, 64–
71.
Chan, S. S., Chan, W. S., Cheng, Y., Fung, O. W., Lai, T. K.,
Loke, A. Y., & Fung, O. W. M. (2014). Nurses’ competen- cies in disaster nursing: Implications
for curriculum development and public health. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 11, 3289–3303.
Matsumoto, S., Takahira, S., Katahono, K., Yoshida, E., & Utsumi, A. (2006). Construction of
disaster nursing in basic nursing education: Survey of disaster nursing education in nursing
university and future prospect to build disaster nur- sing. Journal of the Faculty of Nursing and
Nutrition Siebold University of Nagasaki, 7, 53–60.
Nakajima, K., Owatari, K., & Okumura, J. (2013). Study of the nursing students in the volunteer
activities at the temporary houses. Bulletin of Japanese Red Cross Toyota College of Nursing,
8, 41–46.
Noguchi, K., Katsuhara, Y., Suzuki, E., Banjo, C., Williamson, A., Ozasa, Y., . . . ;Hosomi, A.
(2017). Ethical issues recognized by disaster relief nurses dispatched in the disaster area of
the Great East Japan Earthquake. Journal of Japanese Nursing Ethics, 9, 38–44.
Ojima, T., & Volunteer Research Group (2008). Role of non- professional volunteers in disaster
response. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health, 57, 245–251.
Pattillo, M. M., & O’Day, T. M. (2009). Disaster response: The University of Texas School of
Nursing experience. Nursing & Health Sciences, 11, 378–381.
Sakai, Y., Maruyama, T., Matsuo, K., Okuno, Y., Kaneda, T., Aoki, N., .. . ;Morinaka, K. (2016).
Learning of the student who participated in off-campus volunteer enterprise. The
report from the reconstruction assistance volunteer study tour after the Great East Japan
Earthquake. The second news. Bulletin of Fukuoka Jo Gakuin University, 6, 11–17.
Sakihama, K. (2017). Toward co-existence between victims and disaster volunteers. Tokyo, Japan:
Impress R&D.
58
Journal Of Nursing Practice
http://jurnal.strada.ac.id/jnp
Vol.2 No.1. October 2018. Page.58-63
ISSN: 2614-3488 (print); 2614-3496 (online)
Sawada, Y., Kojo, S., Nakayama, A., & Tsugeno, H. (2015). Disaster nursing education program in
nursing university. Bulletin of Niimi College, 36, 21–26.
Schmidt, C. K., Davis, J. M., Sanders, J. L., Chapman, L. A., Cisco, M. C., & Hady, A. R. (2011). Exploring
nursing stu- dents’ level of preparedness for disaster response. Nursing Education Perspectives,
32, 380–383.
Tomizawa, Y., Onogi, H., Sugawara, N., Sugiyama, T., Sugawara, C., Kawamura, M., .. . ;Kadoya, K.
(2014). Nursing students’ learning through volunteer activities after the Great East Japan
Earthquake. Bulletin of Tohoku Fukushi University, 38, 199–220.
University of Hyogo, The 21st Century Center of Excellence Program. (2006). Core competencies
required for disaster nursing. Hyogo, Japan: University of Hyogo College of Nursing Art and
Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.coe-
cnas.jp/english/group_education/core_competencies_list. html.
Usher, K., & Mayner, L. (2010). Disaster nursing: A descrip- tive survey of Australian undergraduate
nursing curricula. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, 14, 75–80.
Wenji, Z., Turale, S., Stone, T., & Petrini, M. A. (2015). Chinese nurses’ relief experiences following
two earth- quakes: Implications for disaster education and policy development. Nurse Education
in Practice, 15, 75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.06.011.
World Health Organization & International Council of Nurses. (2009). ICN framework of disaster
nursing competencies. Geneva, Switzerland: International Council of Nurses.
Yamamoto, A. (2013). Development of disaster nursing in Japan, and trends of disaster nursing in the
world. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 10, 162–169.
Yonge, O., Rosychuk, R. J., Bailey, T. M., Lake, R., & Marrie,
Yoshihara, M., Ide, W., & Makioka, S. (2012). Survey of the Great East Japan Earthquake reconstruction
volunteer experience among university students [Internet]. Retrieved from
http://www.kodaikyo.org/110311/qresults.pdf.
59
Journal Of Nursing Practice
http://jurnal.strada.ac.id/jnp
Vol.2 No.1. October 2018. Page.58-63
ISSN: 2614-3488 (print); 2614-3496 (online)
ABSTRACT
Background: The high number of disasters in Indonesia pushed against the need for
vigilance on the disaster. preparations to be made by civil society organizations, especially
scouts, TAGANA or SAR've pretty much done, but preparedness at the family level and
the individual is still a lot of efforts increase efforts to improve the preparedness of the
family in the face of disaster requires an effort to educate more people, especially in terms
of disaster mitigation.
Purpose : The aim of this study was to determine the effect of education on disaster
preparedness landslides on knowledge and attitude of the head of the family in the hamlet
village Jethi Blimbing Mojo Subdistrict Kediri.
Methods : This research design is pre-experimental with approach to one group pre-post
test, the data obtained using questionnaire. The number of samples taken in this research
were 78 respondents, by purposive sampling.
Result : Of the total 78 respondents surveyed after being given counseling, 37 respondents
(47.4%) had knowledge of preparedness landslides in enough categories and 47
respondents (60.3%) had the attitude of preparedness landslides in the positive category.
The analysis in this research for the knowledge using wilcoxon sign rank test statistics
obtained p = 0,000<0,05 then H0 is rejected and H1 accepted. Whereas for the attitude
using Mc.Nemar statistic test obtained p = 0.001 <0.05 then H0 is rejected and H1
accepted
Conclusion : By giving periodic counseling and provision of information continuously, it
can affect respondents' knowledge about disaster preparedness landslides, because it can
affect the stimulus and understand the information provided.
Received July, 25, 2018; Revised August 24, 2018; Accepted September 14, 2018
60
Journal Of Nursing Practice
http://jurnal.strada.ac.id/jnp
Vol.2 No.1. October 2018. Page.58-63
ISSN: 2614-3488 (print); 2614-3496 (online)
How to Cite: Anggraini, N., Sutrisno, S., Hasanah, W. (2018). Giving Extension Effect On Landslide Disaster
Preparedness of Householder’s Knowledge And Attitude. Journal Of Nursing Practice, 2(1), 58-63.
https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v2i1.44
The Journal of Nursing Practice, its website, and the articles published there in are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
International License.
61
BACKGROUND
The high number of disasters in Indonesia encourages the need for awareness of
disasters, starting with the government that forms the National Disaster Management
Agency (BNPB), at the level of the environment stands the Disaster Response Youth
Organization (TAGANA). Preparedness is expected to develop at all levels of society,
especially at the family level, but at the family level disaster has not become a problem that
must be faced together and there are solutions that are specific to each family (Ramli,
2012).
In 2014 the number of landslide victims in Indonesia was 6,785 families with a
death toll of 312 people (BNPB Pusat, 2014). For East Java Province in 2014 the highest
number of disasters was floods that occurred in 147 locations, wind disasters reached 128
locations and landslides as many as 98 locations, the number of landslide victims in East
Java Province in 2014 was 635 households with 12 people killed (East Java Province
BPBD, 2014).
The results of the preliminary study conducted on February 16, 2015 in Jethi
Hamlet, Blimbing Village, Mojo District, Kediri Regency, have received counseling about
disaster preparedness from the BPBD of Kediri Regency and from the Sub-District.
Interviews with 7 people revealed that 6 people did not understand the knowledge and
attitudes in dealing with landslides. The responsibility for carrying out disaster
management activities can be in the form of preparedness, namely: actions that allow
governments, organizations, communities, communities and individuals to be able to
respond to a disaster situation quickly and accurately (Rante, 2013). The preparations that
must be carried out by community organizations, especially Scouts, TAGANA and other
Search and Rescue (SAR) Agencies have been done quite a lot, but the readiness at the
family and individual levels is still not much done. This condition creates the emergence of
dependence on families and individuals at the time of the disaster, so that they cannot carry
out anticipation independently and depend more on existing SAR organizations, even
though the presence of the organization is uncertain quickly during a disaster (Djafar,
2013). Efforts to improve family preparedness in dealing with disasters require efforts to
provide counseling to the community, especially in terms of disaster mitigation
(Karnawati, 2005)..
OBJECTIVE
The general objective of this study was to determine the effect of providing
counseling on landslide disaster preparedness on the knowledge and attitudes of the head
of the family in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo District, Kediri Regency.
METHODS
The research design used was pre-experimental with one group pre-post test
approach. The population in this study were all heads of families in Jethi Village, Blimbing
Village, Mojo District, Kediri Regency, totaling 360 families. The sample in this study
were some households in Jethi Hamlet as many as 78 respondents.
In this study using purposive sampling sampling technique that is sampling from
members of the population in accordance with the criteria that have been previously known
by researchers.
The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire sheet. Data processing that has
been collected is done by editing, coding, scoring, and tabulating.
Data analysis used to test knowledge used the Wilcoxon signed rank test and to test
the attitude using the Mc Nemar test. With a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS
a. Characteristics of Respondents
Characteristics of research respondents include age, education, occupation,
information history and length of stay. There were half of the respondents aged 26-45
years as many as 39 respondents (50%), elementary level education (SD, SMP) as many
as 37 respondents (48%), working as farmers / farm laborers as many as 26 respondents
(33%), had received information about landslides from officers as many as 31
respondents (40%), and have lived in Jethi Hamlet for more than 10 years as many as 48
respondents (62%).
b. Variable Characteristics
It is known that before counseling, almost half of the respondents had knowledge
about landslide disaster preparedness in the sufficient category, namely 32 respondents
(41.0%) and attitudes of landslide disaster preparedness in the negative category,
namely 44 respondents (56.4%). While after counseling, almost half of the respondents
had knowledge about landslide disaster preparedness in the sufficient category, namely
37 respondents (47.4%) and landslide disaster preparedness attitudes in the positive
category, namely 47 respondents (60.3%).
c. Statistical Test Results
That prior to counseling almost half of the respondents had knowledge of
landslide disaster preparedness in the sufficient category, namely 32 respondents
(41.0%) and after counseling almost half of the respondents had sufficient knowledge in
the category, namely 37 respondents (47.4% ) The results of statistical tests using
Willcoxon signed rank test showed that the value of p = 0,000 <α = 0,05 so that H0 was
rejected and H1 was accepted. Whereas for attitudes it is known that before counseling
some respondents had a negative attitude, namely 44 respondents (56.4%). and after
counseling some respondents who have attitudes in the negative category, namely 31
respondents (39.7%). The results of the statistical test using the McNemar test showed
that the value of p = 0.001 <α = 0.05 so that H0 was rejected and H1 was accepted.
DISCUSSION
a Knowledge of the Head of the Family in Jethi Hamlet, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri Regency Before Being Provided Counseling
Knowledge of the head of the family in Jethi Hamlet, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri Regency, it was known that before the extension was carried out,
almost half of the respondents had knowledge about landslide disaster preparedness in
the sufficient category, namely 32 respondents (41.0%). Knowledge is a domain that is
very important to do a person's actions (Overt Behavior). Age affects a person's
catching power, the more it grows, the more the catching power and mindset will
develop, so that the knowledge gained will improve (Nursalam, 2008). According to
Y.B. Mantra is quoted by Notoatmodjo (2010). In general, the higher the education, the
more easily one receives information. Information will have an influence on one's
knowledge, knowledge can also be obtained by someone from the information they
have received. In addition, work is also a factor that influences knowledge. The more
people will get more information (Notoatmodjo, 2007).
The results of cross tabulation between age and knowledge shows that age 26-45
years old has sufficient knowledge in the category of 33.3%. The result of cross
tabulation between education and knowledge shows that most respondents with basic
education (elementary, junior high) have knowledge in the less category as many as 20
respondents (25.6%). Whereas respondents who have never received information have
knowledge about landslide disaster preparedness in the less category, namely 9
respondents (11.5%) and the results of tabulation of knowledge with the employment
of peasants / farm laborers before extension has knowledge of disaster preparedness in
the less category, namely 14 respondents (17.9%). This study shows that the majority
of respondents have sufficient knowledge, this means that respondents actually already
know about disaster preparedness, but their knowledge still does not meet to be used as
a basis for disaster preparedness.
b Attitude of the Head of the Family in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri Regency Before Being Provided Counseling
The attitude of the head of the family in Jethi Hamlet, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri District, it was known that before the extension was carried out, almost
half of the respondents had the attitude of landslide disaster preparedness in the
negative category, namely 44 respondents (56.4%).
Attitude is a general evaluation made by man against himself, others, objects or
issues which are certain regularities in terms of feelings (affection), thinking
(cognition) and predisposing actions (konasi) (Azwar, 2005). Attitudes have a tendency
to behave (Notoatmodjo, 2010).
Based on the results of the study it is known that respondents with jobs as
farmers / farm laborers have a landslide disaster preparedness attitude in the negative
category, namely 18 respondents (23.1%). As farmers in general the community has
minimal access to information, this causes respondents to respond to disaster
preparedness tends to be negative. attitude will be easier to form if personal experience
occurs in situations involving emotional factors.
c Knowledge of the Head of the Family in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo
Subdistrict, Kediri Regency After Being Provided Counseling
Knowledge of the head of the family in Jethi Hamlet, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri District, was known that after counseling, almost half of the
respondents had knowledge about landslide preparedness in the sufficient category,
namely 37 respondents (47.4%).
Age affects a person's catching power, the more it grows, the more the catching
power and mindset will develop, so that the knowledge gained will improve (Nursalam,
2008). In addition, the higher the education of a person, the easier it is to receive
information. Information will give effect to one's knowledge, knowledge can also be
obtained by someone from the information they have received (Notoatmodjo, 2010).
Respondents' knowledge after the extension was in the sufficient category. The
low level of understanding received by respondents was caused by many things
including respondents with basic level education after being educated having
knowledge of landslide preparedness in the sufficient category, namely 21 respondents
(26.9%) while respondents who had received information from officers after
counseling had knowledge of landslide preparedness in good category, namely 15
respondents (19.2%).
d Attitude of the Head of the Family in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo
Subdistrict, Kediri Regency After Being Provided Counseling
The attitude of the head of the family in Jethi Hamlet, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri Regency, was known that after counseling, almost half of the
respondents had a landslide disaster preparedness attitude in the positive category,
which was 47 respondents (60.3%).
One of the factors that influence the success of counseling is the target factor, for
example the level of education is too low so it is difficult to receive the message
delivered, the socioeconomic level is too low so it does not pay much attention to the
messages conveyed because it is more concerned with more urgent needs, beliefs and
customs that have been embedded so that it is difficult to change it, the condition of the
environment where the target lives is not likely to change behavior (Mubarak, 2007).
The results showed that after being given counseling there was an increase in the
attitude of respondents where some respondents were negative to be positive. This
condition is caused by the provision of counseling not only to provide information to
respondents but also provide motivation to respondents.
The tabulation results show that respondents with jobs as farmers / farm laborers
after extension have attitudes of landslide disaster preparedness in the negative
category, namely 15 respondents (19.2%). This condition shows that respondents who
work as farmers tend to be more difficult to change their attitudes in the
implementation of disaster preparedness so that the attitude of respondents does not
change and tends to remain negative. In addition, people who were> 10 years old living
in the area had an attitude in the negative category, namely 27 respondents (34.6%).
This shows that counseling and length of stay also affect the attitude of the head of the
family but these attitudes cannot be changed completely because they feel that they
have been in the area since childhood and they also have no other place to live than in
the area
e The Influence of Providing Counseling on Preparedness of Landslide Disasters
Against Knowledge of Family Heads in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri Regency
The results of statistical tests using Willcoxon signed rank test showed that there
was a significant effect of providing counseling on landslide disaster preparedness on
the knowledge of the head of the family in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo
Subdistrict, Kediri Regency.
Knowledge of the head of the family before being given counseling had enough
knowledge in the category of 32 respondents, namely 41% and knowledge in the
category of less, namely 37.2%. After being given counseling knowledge of
respondents in the less category decreased to 9% and respondents who had sufficient
knowledge in the category increased to 47.4%.
Based on the results of the analysis it can be seen that counseling has a
significant influence on knowledge about disaster preparedness, this is because
counseling is a process or effort carried out so that the community in this study is the
head of the family, can better understand the disaster preparedness efforts, this is
important considering the respondents live in areas prone to landslides.
f The Influence of Providing Counseling on Preparedness of Landslide Disasters
Against the Attitudes of Family Heads in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo
District, Kediri Regency
The results of statistical tests using the McNemar test showed that there was a significant
effect of providing counseling on landslide disaster preparedness on the attitude of the head of the
family in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo District, Kediri Regency.
Counseling can significantly change the attitude of the people who were originally negative
changed to positive, this was because respondents who received counseling gained enlightenment
that preparedness was important to be carried out, especially in the counseling process researchers
were accompanied by community leaders who were considered important in the community so
that the respondents appeared to be able to be better in implementing disaster preparedness
CONCLUSION
There is a significant effect of providing counseling on landslide disaster preparedness to the
knowledge of the head of the family in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo District, Kediri Regency
There is a significant effect of providing counseling on landslide disaster preparedness on the attitude
of the family head in Jethi Village, Blimbing Village, Mojo District, Kediri Regency.
REFERENCES
Azwar, S. (2005). Sikap Manusia : Teori Dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Mubarak. (2007). Promosi Kesehatan : Sebuah Pengantar Proses Belajar Mengajar Dalam
Pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu
Muslihati, I., Lisandy, Y., Kasanah, R., & Winarko, H. (2018). Effect Of Education Media Video On
Improve Stroke Prevention Behavior In Continued Age In Wiyurejo Pujon Malang. Journal
Of Nursing Practice, 1(2), 12-17.
https://doi.org/10.30994/jnp.v1i2.28
Notoatmodjo. (2007). Promosi Kesehatan Dan Ilmu Perilaku. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Notoatmodjo.
(2010). Promosi Kesehatan Teori dan Aplikasinya. Cetakan 2. Jakarta :
Rineka Cipta.
Ramli, S. (2012). Pedoman Praktis Manajemen Bencana. Jakarta : Dian Rakyat
165
Available online at www.ijmrhs.com
ABSTRACT
Background: Turkey is a country that very frequently experiences disasters due to its geological structure, and
earthquakes are Turkey’s most frequent type of natural disaster. To best fulfill their roles and responsibilities during
a disaster, nurses are expected to enhance their knowledge and experience. Aim: This was a descriptive study and
aimed to determine nursing students’ knowledge levels on disaster nursing and their state of disaster
preparedness. Method: This study included fourth-year nursing students in two universities located in the Ankara
and Konya provinces of Turkey. It was conducted in the second education terms between 2015-2016 and 2016-
2017. For data analysis, this study used frequency values, a chi-square test to assess students’ views on disaster
nursing courses by their universities, and an independent sample t-test. Results: 51.6% students were nursing
students in University A located in Konya, with 48.4% studying at University B in Ankara. The mean age of students
was 2.41 ± 0.95 years, and 85.5% were female. Most of students studying in University A (67.8%) reported that
they had received education about disasters, and this rose to 83.2% in University B students. This showed that
students’ disaster education status differed between universities. Only 6.8% of University A students reported that
they had received disaster nursing education, while 68.6% of students studying at University B had received
education about disaster nursing. The data obtained from this study showed that the status of receiving disaster
nursing education varied according to the university attended (p<0.05), that there were statistically significant
relationships between disaster nursing knowledge scores and students’ universities, genders, whether they had
received education about disasters and disaster nursing. Conclusion: This study found significant differences
between students in both universities in terms of their having received education about disasters, disaster nursing,
and knowledge scores on disaster nursing.
INTRODUCTION
Disasters are generally defined as ecological or man-made events that occur beyond the control
of people, cause loss of life and property, disturb daily life, and can create the need for foreign
assistance if they exceed the capacity of a society to respond and adapt [1]. Around the world,
166
millions of people have been negatively affected by natural or man-made disasters, either by
death, disability, or disease that occurred as a result of these disasters [2]. Natural disasters
include earthquake and flood, but also there are also unnatural disasters, including nuclear
accidents, dam collapse, etc. Natural disasters occur frequently and vary a lot in Turkey,
primarily earthquakes, causing humanitarian and economic losses [1]. During disasters, it is
expected that healthcare services will be maintained in the best possible way. From the
perspective of healthcare services, the type and duration of disasters are important in terms of
being indicators of disease, and injuries and providing information about the quality and speed of
the needed service. The disaster preparedness of nurses is important as they are members of a
health care team that should work systematically in all conditions [3,4]. In disasters, many
recurrent problems which impede medical response arise from the inadequate education and
training of health care professionals, from not understanding disaster medicine plans and
protocols well, and from skill inadequacy and lack of experience [5]. In many countries, disaster
nursing education is rarely provided to students to the same degree as fundamental nursing
education, there are few models and drafts related to the process of understanding disaster
nursing to guide nurses [6].
167
Ozpulat, et al. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2018, 7(8): 165-174
Understanding the importance of disaster nursing enables nurses to take part in all stages of a
disaster, and to actively and effectively participate in disaster management plans made in all
fields, included in the health system [7]. There are only a limited number of studies in the
Turkish literature, and it is important to highlight the need for disaster nursing to increase the
number of these studies. Based on this, this descriptive study aimed to determine nursing
students’ knowledge levels of disaster nursing and their state of disaster preparedness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a cross-sectional and descriptive study. The population of this study included nursing
students in two universities that conduct university-level learning-teaching activities in in the
Ankara and Konya provinces of Turkey. Data was collected in the second terms in the 2015 and
2017 school years. A trial of this study was administered to fourth-year nursing students (n=80)
of a private university in Ankara, which was not included in the population of this study.
Following this, the researchers corrected incomprehensible and incomplete questions and the
main study began. The sample of this study comprised 146 students who were studying in a
nursing department of University A in the province of Konya, and 137 students who were
studying in the nursing faculty of University B in Ankara province. A questionnaire form was
developed as a data collection tool. The three-part questionnaire was developed following a
literature review [8-12].
Data Analysis
The data collected from this study were analyzed using the SPSS version 17.0 (Statistical
Package for Social Sciences for Windows) software. As well as frequency values, this study also
used the chi-square test to compare nursing students’ opinions about the disaster nursing
education given by their universities, and the independent groups sample t-test to compare
students’ characteristics and disaster nursing knowledge scores.
RESULTS
More than half of participating students (51.6%) were students in University A, and 48.4% were
studying in University
B. The mean age of students was 2.41 ± 0.95 years and the majority (85.5%) were female. More
than half of the participants (52.7%) were living in dormitories, two participants, who selected
the “other” option, were living in student apartment (Table 1).
167
Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of nursing students
Variables Min-Max X ± SS
Age 20-26 22.41±.95
University n %
A University 146 51.6
B University 137 48.4
Gender
Female 242 85.5
Male 41 14.5
Where Living in
Home 149 52.7
Dormitory 132 46.6
Other 2 0.7
Total 283 100
More than half of the participating students had experienced a disaster once before (University A
52.7%, University B 52.6%) and almost all disasters experienced were earthquakes (University
A 91.5%, University B 93.4%). There were a few students who had knowledge about the
resistance to disaster of the place where they lived (University A 34.2%, University B 36.5%),
there were 13 students who had knowledge about the disaster resistance of their university, and
17 students had a disaster emergency kit (Table 2).
Table 2 Nursing students’ disaster experience
More than half of the participating students wanted to become a disaster nurse (University A
61.6%, University B 63.5%), almost all students thought that they needed to receive education
on disaster nursing (University A 96.6%, University B 97.1%).
Effective
80
Very Effective
70
Less Effective
60
50
40
30
20
10
A Unıversity
Effective
70
60 Less Effective
Very Effective
50
40
30
20
10
B Unıversity
Figure 1B Students’ thoughts about whether they could be effective during a disaster (University B)
In both universities, half of the participating students thought that they could be effective during
a disaster. Of University A and B students, 19.2% and 30.7% respectively stated that they could
be less effective (Figures 1A and 1B).
Most of the students correctly answered the statement, “No intervention should be performed on
people buried in the wreckage until they arrive at the hospital.” (University A 80.8%, University
B 86.1%). Similarly, a great majority of students gave the correct response to the statement, “In
the event of extension of disaster time, a nurse ensures people who have to live in shelters and
tent cities to receive health care services.” (University A 70.5%, University B 86.9%). The
statement, “Tasks, roles and responsibilities given to nurses should be clearly defined in
regulations,” was correctly answered by only 18.5% of University A students and by 51.8% of
University B students (Table 4).
Table 4 Distribution of nursing students’ responses to questions on disaster nursing knowledge
University A University B
Answers
n % n %
No intervention should be performed on people buried in the wreckage until they arrive at the
118 80.8 118 86.1
hospital.
In the event of extension of disaster time, a nurse ensures people who have to live in shelters
103 70.5 119 86.9
and tent cities to receive health care services.
In disaster management, disaster intervention is more important than disaster preparedness. 94 64.4 116 84.7
A nurse ensures people with chronic diseases, as well as those who need immediate aid, can
88 60.3 115 83.9
receive health care services.
During disasters, triage is done by specialized physicians. 57 39 115 83.9
In disaster management, more attention is paid to an integrated approach than to short-term
72 49.3 110 80.3
efforts.
In disasters, triage is related to the needs of physicians or the institution. 55 37.7 110 80.3
In disaster management, damage reduction efforts are enhanced rather than relieving disaster-
86 58.9 104 75.9
victims.
After a disaster, all disaster-victims are transferred to hospitals by 112-ambulance staff. 66 45.2 96 70.1
In triage, the color code of patients with extremely low chances of survival is green. 29 19.9 88 64.2
In disaster management, risk management is substituted for crisis management. 37 25.3 87 63.5
Tasks and responsibilities given to nurses begin with rescue efforts after the event. 49 33.6 82 59.9
In the regulations on family medicine, there is a statement that a nurse performs emergency
47 32.2 79 57.7
planning, develops protocols and creates teams where necessary.
Tasks, roles and responsibilities given to nurses should be clearly defined in regulations. 27 18.5 71 51.8
One cause of mortality after a disaster is cardiac arrhythmias. 95 65.1 69 50.4
The purpose of decontamination is to protect personnel and medical services from
50 34.2 55 40.1
contamination.
In disasters, limited and insufficient responsibilities are given to nurses. 23 15.8 64 46.7
There is a disaster management system in which a nurse actively and effectively participates. 10 6.8 50 36.5
The system used in disasters is generally the START system. 15 10.3 37 27
IV fluids which are provided during interventions performed after a disaster should contain
23 15.8 29 21.2
potassium.
This study determined that the participating students’ disaster nursing knowledge scores
generally varied between 5 and 95, and their arithmetic mean was found to be 50.49 ± 19.77.
Students’ disaster nursing knowledge scores varied by their universities, whether they had
received education on disasters and disaster nursing, and their genders (Table 5).
Table 5 Comparison of nursing students’ characteristics and their disaster nursing knowledge levels
DISCUSSION
Turkey is a country that very frequently experiences disasters due to its geologic, morphologic,
and climatic characteristics, predominantly earthquake, flood, and avalanche [9-13]. This study
showed that more than half of the students had experienced a disaster once before (University A
52.7%, University B 52.6%) and that almost all disasters experienced were earthquakes
(University A 91.5%, University B 93.4%). Similarly, in a study by Ulas and Uncu in 2015,
55.6% (n=880) of 1267 adults reported that they had directly suffered from a disaster.
According to the data of the disaster awareness and preparedness to disasters research study
conducted in Turkey, 23% of Turkey’s population had directly experienced a disaster, and 65%
of this study’s participants reported that the disaster they experienced had an effect on their
disaster awareness [10-29]. Similarly, in the study by Ulas and Uncu in 2015, the rate of disaster
exposure was found to be higher than in the Turkey Disaster Research study. It was thought that
the difference was because the participants may have lived in earthquake zones. In this study,
67.8% of University A nursing students and 83.2% of University B nursing students reported
that they had received education about disasters. A statistically significant difference was found
between those who had education about disasters by universities (p<0.05). According to the
Turkey Disaster Research study results, 33.5% people think they have disaster awareness [15-
29]. Based on the fact that disaster awareness is low in society, it can be stated that health
professionals play a key role in increasing social awareness and consciousness, and that it is
highly important for them to gain the necessary knowledge and experience during their
undergraduate education. Concerning disaster nursing, only 6.8% of University A students
reported that they had received education, while 68.6% of students studying in University B had
received disaster nursing education. This study’s findings showed that there was a statistically
significant difference (p<0.05) by universities between those who had received disaster nursing
education and knowledge scores by universities. In the literature, it has been stated that nurses
have knowledge gaps on disaster management and a great majority of nurses have inadequate
preparedness for disaster events [8,14,15]. A study by Hisar and Yurdakul in 2015 determined
that of 440 nursing students, 24.6% had received education for disaster and emergencies, and
21.1% had received education before, after and during disaster and emergencies. The study also
found that nurses had inadequate knowledge on issues on which they are expected to give
service during disasters such as triage, decontamination, field hospitals in the aftermath of
disaster, and materials needed after disasters [16].
According to this study, the number of University A nursing students who received education
about disaster nursing was extremely low (6.8%). Disaster nursing education is given in some
universities without a standard terminology or a common curriculum, demonstrating continuing
need in this area. This necessity for education on disaster nursing has also been indicated in
foreign literature. A study in Hong Kong examined nurses’ disaster preparedness (n=164) and
showed that almost all participants (97%) did not feel adequately prepared for disasters and that
all participants were in agreement on the fact that nurses should receive courses for disaster
preparedness [8]. In this study, the disaster nursing need rate was found to be 97.1%, showing
that students, including those who had received prior education, needed more comprehensive
education. Another remarkable finding of this study was that the those who regarded themselves
as being “less effective” was 30.7% in University B nursing students, where 68.6% of
participating students had already received disaster nursing education, and 19.2% in University
A nursing students where 6.8% of participating students had previously received disaster
nursing education. The lower rate of students, who had not received prior education, on
regarding themselves as being “less effective”, led researchers to conclude that students did not
have sufficient awareness about disaster nursing.
A study by Inal, et al. in 2012 determined that 74% of 291 vocational high school students had
received basic education for disaster awareness and 42.5% of them had received this education
in school [12]. Celik in 2010 conducted a study with 204 nurses who worked in the Turkish Red
Crescent and found that they regarded their basic competence skills at the level of “being able to
do with help, and being able to do,” and they mostly participated in first-aid (74.0%) and basic
life-support (48.5%) courses.
Courses in which nurses wanted to participate for disaster preparedness included mental care
after trauma, communication in a state of crisis and disaster, field triage, first-aid, infection
control, basic life support, and advanced life support (trauma, children, cardiovascular) courses
[6,8].
It is possible to predict the development of disasters and to prevent the losses related to them.
Providing necessary support and incentive for taking these precautions are part of nurses’
professional responsibilities and nurses have a role of first-aid specialist not only after, but also
before disasters. Therefore, it is important for nurses to receive education on issues such as
disaster prevention, first-aid during disasters, and rehabilitation after disaster.
Although disaster education has come into prominence in recent years, disaster nursing
knowledge is defined as “inadequate” in many countries [17-24]. The disaster knowledge score
in this study was found to be 50.49 ± 19.77, while it was 66.3% in the study of Jiang, et al. in
2013. Increase in nursing students’ knowledge, attitude and behaviors will enable them to
develop disaster awareness and self-sufficiency.
In this study, the statement, “During disasters, triage is done by specialized physicians” was
answered correctly by 39% of University A students and by 83.9% of University B students. The
meaning of triage is to select and sort, and it is used to group patients according to their needs
for emergency and primary treatment in medicine [25]. The important issue here is that nurses
should have an ability to determine triage in emergency and primary care situations, such as
disaster, where physicians are not available or are insufficient [26]. Only 37.7% of University A
and 80.3% of University B nursing students correctly answered the statement, “In disasters,
triage is related to the needs of physicians or the institution”.
Similarly, the statement, “In triage, the color code of patients with extremely low chances of
survival is green,” was answered correctly by University B students at higher rates than
University A students (University A 19.9%, University B 64.2%). However, it was seen that the
rate of nursing students in both universities who correctly responded to the statement, “The
system used in disasters is generally the START system,” is low (University A 10.3%,
University B 27.0%). A study with 260 employees from 112 emergency health services stations
reported that among disaster management issues, the one most correctly answered was
“coordination/communication/command” (84.6%), and the least correctly answered issue was
“triage” (40.0%). According to results of another study which aimed to measure knowledge level
of nurses on triage that was conducted with 86 nurses in nine hospitals, 67.6% of participants
correctly responded to the question, “What is triage?”, and 68% correctly responded to the aims
of triage [10].
As most regions in Turkey are located in seismic belts, in all these crisis situations, health care
professionals, and even rescue teams should have already been informed about both basic
knowledge necessities, such as emergency care services, triage and first-aid, treatment and care
of crush syndrome, and acute kidney failure. In addition, it is also important for health
professionals to perform their clinical responsibilities properly after patients arrive at health
centers [27].
In accidents, including the mine accident in Turkey in 2014 that led to the death of 301 miners,
train accidents, huge earthquakes such as the 2015 Nepal earthquake that killed at least 8,000
people and injured 19,000, ongoing wars with death tolls exceeding 220,000 by January 2015,
according to United Nations data people face preventable or remediable complications and early
medical intervention can be life-saving for many injured people [28].
To minimize health hazards that can occur in disaster situations and life-threatening injury,
nurses take roles in health management, assistance, and care provision during disasters [29,30].
Nurses have special knowledge about groups at risk in society because they are health
professionals who are in close touch with society. Therefore, they can immediately use this
knowledge during disasters and can diagnose the physical and psychosocial effects of disaster on
the well-being of individuals, families, and society [31,32]. In disaster situations, nurses support
and help individuals to believe in themselves, while experiencing difficult times and
restructuring their lives.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This study showed that more than half of the participating students had experienced a disaster,
and almost all disasters experienced were earthquakes. There were significant differences
between students in both universities in terms of whether they had received education about
disasters and disaster nursing, and knowledge scores on disaster nursing. Disaster nursing
knowledge scores varied by students’ universities, and whether they had received education
about disasters and disaster nursing. Disasters affect millions of people’s lives in all geographic
regions, they cause economic losses, as well as having negative effects on the people’s health
and quality of life. Improved awareness and consciousness about disasters can be life-saving,
and local and national education programs are required to ensure this. The education of health
staff is particularly important in regions where disasters are experienced severely and intensely.
Thus, health staff who are active and professional in their fields can prevent many mistakes and
incorrect health care practices. In Turkey, there is no defined standard for nursing student’s
education and training, at the same time there are significant differences in courses included in
university curricula and in their contents. While in some universities, disaster nursing can be
selected as a separate course, it can be discussed in a limited way as part of the community
health nursing course in other universities.
It would be effective for teaching nurses, who have full knowledge of the field, are aware of
their tasks and responsibilities before, after and during disaster, and who can properly display
their professional proficiencies, to organize in-service training programs for healthcare staff. It
should also be mandatory for nurses to periodically complete a certain number of hours training,
to minimize curricula differences between universities, and to include disaster nursing as a
compulsory course in all nursing schools.
DECLARATIONS
Conflict of Interest
[22] Hammad, Karen S., Paul Arbon, and Kristine M. Gebbie. “Emergency nurses and disaster response:
an explora- tion of South Australian emergency nurses’ knowledge and perceptions of their roles in
disaster response.” Aus- tralasian Emergency Nursing Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2011, pp. 87-94.
[23] Pesiridis, Theodoros, et al. “Development, implementation and evaluation of a disaster training
programme for nurses: A Switching Replications randomized controlled trial.” Nurse education in
practice, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, pp. 63-67.
[24] Hartman, Rhonda Gay. “Tripartite triage concerns: Issues for law and ethics.” Critical Care Medicine,
Vol. 31, No. 5, 2003, pp. S358-S361.
[25] Esin, S., et al. “Afetlerde Sağlık Hizmetleri Yönetimi.”, 2000.
[26] Oran, Nazan Tuna, and Aynur Esen. “Kurtarmanın Ötesinde Yaşatmak: Ezilme Sendromu ve
Disiplinlerarası Yaklaşım.” Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nephrology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2012, pp. 8-17.
[27] Yilmaz, Ali Abbas, and Mehmet Oral. “Crush Sendromu.” Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Surgery, Vol. 7,
No. 3, 2002, pp. 183-192.
[28] Slepski, Lynn A. “Emergency preparedness and professional competency among health care
providers during hurricanes Katrina and Rita: pilot study results.” Disaster Management & Response,
Vol. 5, No. 4, 2007, pp. 99-110.
[29] Başbakanlık, T.C. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. Türkiye, Afet Farkındalığı Ve Afetlere
Hazırlık Araştırması. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. Ankara, 2014 [Disaster and Emergency
Management Presidency. Turkey, Disaster Awareness and Disaster Preparedness Survey. Disaster
and Emergency Manage- ment. Ankara], 2014.
[30] Ulaş, Bircan, and Fatoş Uncu. “Aile Hekimliği Birimlerine Başvuran Bireylerde Afet Farkindaliği Araştirmasi.”
18.
Ulusal Halk Sağlığı Kongresi, 2015.
[31] Bakanliği, sağlik, and Sağlik projesi genel koordinatörlüğü. “Afetlerde sağlik Hizmetleri Yönetimi.”, 2001.
[32] Jiang, Lin, et al. “Knowledge, attitudes and competence in nursing practice of typhoon disaster relief
work among Chinese nurses: A questionnaire survey.” International Journal of Nursing Practice, Vol.
21, No.1, 2015, pp. 60-69.
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1701093647 36 |
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS)
e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 17, Issue 01 Ver. IX January. (2018), PP 36-47
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract
Background: The incidence of disaster in Indonesia is dominated by hydrometeorological activity, and 75% of
total disaster is the flood. Preparedness is the critical phase in the range of disaster management because this
phase will determine the independence, success of responsive response, level of suffering the victim, and the
safety of the victim’s life in the event of the disaster.
Purpose: to analyze factors related to the preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in facing flood disaster in Kendari
City of Southeast Sulawesi.
.Method: This research uses descriptive analytic design with Cross-sectional approach. The number of
respondents in this research are 176 nurses of Puskesmas by using purposive sampling. This research
conducted in Kendari City of Southeast Sulawesi at Puskesmas located in flood-prone areas, namely,
Puskesmas Mata, Puskesmas Kandai, Puskesmas Lepo-Lepo, Puskesmas Benu-Benua, and Puskesmas Poasia.
Result: correlation test of Spearman Rank indicates that there is a significant correlation between knowledge
(p
=0.000), attitude (p =0.000), self-efficacy (p =0.000), government policy according to nurse perception (p
=0.000), and infrastructure (p =0.000) with the preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in facing flood disaster.
Logistic regression test indicates that self-efficacy is the most correlated factor with the preparedness of
Puskesmas nurse in facing flood disaster with Exp(B) value of 8.139.
Conclusion: Factor of knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, government policy according to nurse perception, and
infrastructure facilities are significantly correlated with the preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in facing flood
disaster, but self-efficacy is the most correlated factor with the nurse preparedness compared to four other
factors.
Keywords: Knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, government policy, infrastructure facilities, nurse preparedness
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1701093647 37 |
Date of Submission: 23-12-2017 Date of acceptance: 22-01-
2018
I. Introduction
Disaster is a phenomenon that can happen anytime, anywhere, and override anyone with
a sudden event process (Mitchel et al., 2015). Disaster occurs when the local resource is
unable to cope with the emergence of an event or threat, whether caused by human or nature.
The condition then has implication for human life and livelihood (Hodge et al., 2017).
Indonesia is one of the countries in the world with the very high incidence of disaster. Every
year the incidence of disaster ranges from 1.500-2.000 times (National Disaster Relief
Agency (BNPB), 2016). The incidence of disaster in Indonesia is dominated by
hydrometeorological activity, and 75% of total incidents are flood. In 2017-2018 the flood
disaster is predicted to still dominate the disaster in Indonesia (Indonesia Disaster Data and
Information (DIBI) -BNPB, 2017).According to BNPB (2016), Kendari City is one of the
areas in Southeast Sulawesi with high disaster risk index of 148.4. 80% of the disaster that
occurred in Kendari City is flood. The Regional Disaster Relief Agency (BPBD) of Kendari
City (2017) states that the flood disaster in Kendari City is caused by geographical condition
with the low land, high rainfall, and overflowing of the largest river in Kendari City, namely,
Wanggu river. This is in accordance with the statement of the National Meteorology,
Climatology, Geophysics Agency (BMKG) of Kendari City (2017), which states that Kendari
City has the trend of high rainfall and increased from 2013 to 2017 by 11-20%. BMKG
Kendari City (2017) also predicts that in 2018 it will still experience an increase in rainfall of
1-2%, so it is still at risk for flood disaster.The disaster has a negative impact both partially
and universally. Disaster impacts can disrupt and exacerbate the stability of various aspects of
life (Shannon, 2015). Disaster can also cause deterioration of health condition both physically
and psychologically (Pourvakhshoori et al., 2017). According to BPBD Kendari City
(2017), the flood victims that occurred in Kendari City in 2016 as many as 7.106 people,
and
www.iosrjournals.org 38 |
Analysis of Factors Related topreparednessof Puskesmas(Community Health Center) Nurse In ..
57.3% of suffering health problems both physical and psychic. The flood victims that
occurred in July 2017 is 7.311, and 59.8% of suffering health problems. Preparedness is the
most important part of disaster management that can be used as a strategy to face and
mitigate the disaster. (Labrague et al., 2016). The International Council of Nurse (ICN) and
the World Health Organization (WHO) (2009), also emphasize that preparedness is critical
phase in the range of disaster management because this phase will determine the
independence, success of responsive response, the level of suffering the victim, and the safety
of the victim’s life in the event of disaster.
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) (2014) &
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (2013) become disaster
preparedness as the main priority in disaster management program. Preparedness of health
personnel contributes greatly to the efforts to suppress the worsening health condition of
disaster victims (Loweri et al., 2017). According to BNPB (2016), the power of health
personnel resources can be obtained from the community of volunteers and the local
government. The health personnel in the government group consists of all medical
professions scattered throughout the hospital and Puskesmas. Puskesmas as primary health
care facility is the spearhead of public health service in the respective working areas
(Department of Health the Republic of Indonesia (Depkes RI, 2012). According to BNPB
(2016), Puskesmas is also one of the resources in disaster management responsible for health
cluster at the village level based on the working area.The nurse is the profession with the
largest population in Puskesmas, and most often interacts with the community (Depkes RI,
2012). According to Loweri et al. (2017), when the nurse has a good level of disaster
preparedness, the community has a chance to improve the health condition that is disrupted
by the disaster, so that the mortality rate may be reduced.The nurse preparedness in facing
disaster is influenced by many factors. The results of research conducted in Israel by
Menilkov et al. (2014) shows that good knowledge of disaster management, realistic
assessment of disaster, and self-efficacy can improve the level of nurse preparedness in
facing disaster. The study conducted in Sweden by Phetricco & Loerzus (2016) finds that the
government policy factor and the completeness of detention infrastructure facilities are
directly proportional to the level of nurse preparedness in facing disaster. Other research also
mentions that in principle the determinant factor of nurse preparedness level is grouped into
two: 1) individual factor that consists of knowledge and attitude; 2) organizational factor such
as facilities and infrastructure (Veenema et al., 2016).The level of health personnel
preparedness including nurses in facing disaster in central and eastern Indonesia is still
relatively low (BNPB, 2013). Data on health personnel preparedness including Puskesmas
nurse in Kendari City also shows the low level of preparedness that is at index 37.98 (BPBD
Kendari City, 2016).The preliminary study at the Department of Health of Kendari City
shows that there are five Puskesmas located in flood-prone areas, namely, Puskesmas Lepo-
Lepo, Puskesmas Mata, Puskesmas Kandai, Puskesmas Benu-Benua, and Puskesmas Poasia.
The interview results of the researcher towards 10 nurses at five Puskesmas prone to flood
show that 70% of nurses state that the availability of supporting infrastructure facilities for
flood preparedness is still lacking. 60% of nurses say that the local government policy has not
provided maximum space for the Puskesmas nurse to do the flood disaster preparedness. In
addition, only 40% of nurses are able to answer correctly regarding the understanding and
objectives of preparedness in disaster management that the researcher asks. Based on these
phenomena, the researcher is interested to conduct research and analyze what factors are
related to the preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in facing flood disaster in Kendari City of
Southeast Sulawesi.
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1701093647 38 |
Distribution of respondents shows that the average age of respondents 32.22 years,
where the youngest age is 22 years old and the oldest age is 54 years with the distribution of
data 7.077. Distribution of Average work duration for 7.41 years, where the minimum length
of work for 1 year and maximum 20 years with the distribution of data 5.266
Based on table 5.2 found that the majority of female respondents are 133 respondents
(75.6%). Some of D-III Nursing is 90 respondents (51.1%). Almost all respondents never
attend disaster training, namely, 113 respondents (64.2%). Most of the respondents who
haveattended the training are not training sourced from the government program, namely, 38
respondents (60.3%).
Based on table 5.10 found that logistic regression analysis in this research uses enter
method. The value of R Square shows the value of 0.749 approaching the value 1, so the
multivariate analysis has good quality and feasible to use. The p-value on all variables are < α
(0.05), which means that there is the relationship between knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy,
government policy according to nurse perception, and infrastructure facilities with the
preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in facing flood disaster in Kendari City of Southeast
Sulawesistrength of relationship of the independent variable can be seen in the value of
Exp(B). The calculation result is obtained value of Exp(B) knowledge is 6.644, value of
Exp(B) attitude is 3.732, value of Exp(B) self-efficacy is 8.139, value of Exp(B) government
policy according to nurse perception is 3.500, and value of Exp(B) infrastructure facilities is
4.032. Based on the results of the analysis, the self-efficacy variable is the independent
variable that is the most related to the dependency variable of preparedness compared with
the variable of knowledge, attitude, government policy according to nurse perception, and
infrastructure facilities.
IV. Discussion
4.1 Knowledge relationship with Preparedness of PuskesmasNurse in
Facing Flood Disaster In Kendari City of Southeast Sulawesi
The result of the bivariate analysis shows that the knowledge of Puskesmas nurse on
the disaster preparedness is significantly related to the preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in
facing flood disaster in Kendari City of Southeast Sulawesi. The result of this research is
supported by the research conducted on 243 nurses in Israel with the result that there is a
relationship between nurse knowledge with preparedness in facing disaster (Melnikov at al.,
2014). Mondargue & Lircones (2015) through the result of their research state that
knowledge is one of the factors that affect the level of nurse preparedness in facing and
tackling disaster. Another research conducted at Sidrap South Sulawesi also emphasizes that
the factor that the most closely related to the
preparedness of health personnel including the nurse in facing disaster is knowledge factor
(Mustamin, 2015).Veneema et al (2016) state that the less nurse knowledge on the disaster
preparedness is one of the obstacles for a nurse to achieve the good level of preparedness in
facing disaster. According to Mondargue & Lircones (2015), knowledge is the foundation
that strongly determines the nurse’s ability regarding appropriate decision-making in
preparation, patient, and society to cope with disaster. If the nurse’s knowledge is lacking, the
nurse will have difficulty in making an appropriate decision about what actions should be
planned and undertaken in the event of the disaster. The International Council of Nurse
(2009) also emphasizes that cognitive knowledge or ability on disaster is a very important
thing to disaster management both in the mitigation, preparedness, responsive response, and
rehabilitation stages. Good cognitive or knowledge will be able to support the nurse’s
competence in preparing for disaster management.The result of the field research shows that
the knowledge of Puskesmas nurse in Kendari City about disaster preparedness is still in the
less category, especially on the aspect of action or effort that must be done in facing flood
disaster. According to Arsenljevlc et al (2017), good and lack of knowledge of a person is
influenced by several factors such as education, age, and experience.Knowledge and
education are two things that can not be separated, it is expected that the higher one’s
education the knowledge will be wider or better. According to Baker (2013), education
contributes to the knowledge that influences one’s attitude and behavior to participate in
disaster preparedness. The same is also pointed out by Chen et al (2016), that education can
facilitate nurse to increase or improve knowledge about the disaster, which will encourage the
creation of disaster preparedness behavior. The result of the field research obtained that there
are five educational backgrounds of Puskesmas nurses in flood-prone areas in Kendari City,
namely: Health Nurse School (SPK), Diploma III in Nursing (D-III), Diploma IV in Nursing
(D-IV), Bachelor of Nursing (S-1), and Ners (Ns). From the fifth education level, D-III
Nursing is the educational background that dominates Puskesmas nurse in Kendari City that
is 51.1%, while the education level of Ners nursing is only 17.6%. The nurse’s knowledge of
disaster preparedness is also influenced by the age factor (Mondargue & Lircones, 2015).
According to Raes et al (2015), age is directly proportional to the process of individual
mental development, where the increasing age of the individual, the process of individual
mental development will be the better, but at a certain age the individual memory will decline
and this greatly affects the ability of individual in receiving and managing information.
Notoatmojo (2012) states that the differences in the level of knowledge at each age level can
be reviewed from the knowledge domain that is knowing, understanding, application,
analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. The higher the level of the individual cognitive domain
the higher the individual's ability in processing and applying an information or knowledge
received. The result of the univariate analysis shows that the average age of Puskesmas nurse
in flood-prone areas of Kendari City is 32 years old with the oldest age is 54 years old.
Another factor that affects nurse knowledge about disaster preparedness is the experience in
conducting disaster preparedness and experience. According to Azwar (2010), the experience
can be used as an effort to gain knowledge by repeating experiences that have ever been
gained in solving the problems encountered. The experience of Puskesmas nurse in disaster-
prone areas related to disaster preparedness and mitigation efforts can also be seen in the
experience of disaster training. This is consistent with the statement of Melnikov et al (2014)
that the nurse can develop knowledge about disaster management through experience in
disaster training and seminar. The result of univariate analysis found that the most or 64.2%
of Puskesmas nurse in flood-prone areas in Kendari City have never attended training on
disaster management.Based on the above description, the researcher can conclude that
knowledge has relation to the preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in facing flood disaster. In
addition, the researcher also believes that the nurse knowledge on preparedness in facing
flood disaster is influenced by education, age, and experience of disaster training.
V. Limitation
Reference sources for nurse preparedness in facing disaster both from Indonesia and abroad
are still lacking, thereby reducing the freedom of researcher in conducting the discussion.
VI. Conclusion
There is a significant correlation between knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy,
government policy according to nurse perception, and infrastructure facilities with the
preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in facing flood disaster in Kendari City of Southeast
Sulawesi. Self-efficacy is the closest factor related to nursing preparedness compared to other
factors.
VII. Suggestion
7.1 For
Nurses
It is expected to increase preparedness in facing flood disaster through the
development of positive knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy towards disaster preparedness.
The development of knowledge can be done by attending training, seminar or workshop on
disaster management both held by government and non- government. The development of
attitude can be done since nursesare in education so as early as possible they understand the
importance of disaster preparedness and understanding of the competence of disaster nursing.
While the development of self-efficacy, the nurses can use local wisdom or local culture that
can strengthen disaster preparedness activities such as Mekombulu and Mepokoaso tradition
in Kendari City of Southeast Sulawesi.
7.2 For the Government of Department of Health
It is expected to create policies that support the preparedness of Puskesmas nurse in
facing flood disaster. The policies such as regular training to Puskesmas nurse on disaster
management, scholarship policy to continue education for Puskesmas nurses who still have
educational background of SPK and D-III Nursing, and to provide and evaluate routinely the
need of supporting infrastructure facilities for preparedness of Puskesmas nurse which is
tailored to the disaster characteristic at risk in the working area of Puskesmas. Such as the
procurement of inflatable boat for the needs of medical services in the event of the flood
disaster. Local wisdom approach in the preparation of disaster management programs to the
health cluster is also important for consideration by the local government.
7.3 For Further Researcher
It is expected that this research can be developed with qualitative research such as
ethnography study to be more deeply explored about the pattern and community’s culture of
Kendari City that can affect either positively or negatively self-efficacy and preparedness of
Puskesmasnurse in facing flood disaster in Kendari City of Southeast Sulawesi.
Bibliography
[1]. Adams, L. M., & Berry, D. (2012). Who will show up? Estimating ability and willingness of essential hospital personnel to report to
work in response to a disaster. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Vol. 17 (2): 1-18.
[2]. Alamsyah. (2017). Pengaruh sumber daya organisasi terhadap kesiapsiagaan petugas BPBD Kabupaten Jeneponto. Tesis Magister
Biomedik Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar
[3]. Alwisol. (2009). Psikologi Kepribadian. Malang : UMM Press
[4]. Ansthobar. D., & Miellen. C. (2013). Disaster Nursing Management. Delhi: Janpoor Company.
[5]. Arsenijevic, O., Trivan, D., Podbregar, I., Sprajc, P. (2017).Strategic aspect of knowledge management.Organizacija, 50 (2): 163-
177.
[6]. Azwar. (2010). Teori dan pengukuran pengetahuan, sikap dan perilaku manusia. Yogyakarta. Nuha Medika.
[7]. Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (BMKG) Kota Kendari. (2017). Data Curah Hujan Kota Kendari 2016-2017.
Kendari. BMKG
[8]. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencan (BNPB). (2016). Buku saku tanggap tangkas tangguh menghadapi Bencana. Jakarta.
BNPB.
[9]. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencan (BNPB). (2016). Penurunan indeks risiko bencana di indonesia. Jakarta. BNPB
[10]. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencan (BNPB). (2013). Perencanaan Kontijensi Menghadapi Bencana. Jakarta. BNPB.
[11]. Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD) Kota Kendari (2016). Data kesiapsiagaan sumber daya dan kebencanaan Kota
Kendari. Kendari. BPBD.
[12]. Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah (BPBD) Kota Kendari. (2017). Dokumen kajian risiko bencana Kota Kendari Propinsi
Sulawesi Tenggara. Kendari. BPBD
[13]. Baker, L. R & Cormier, L. A. (2013). Disaster preparedness and families of children with special needs: A geographic comparison.
[14]. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
[15]. Chen, H., Chang, S. C., Feng, J. Y., Lin, S. J., Chen, L. C., Lee, C. L., & Lai. (2017). Nurse participation in continuing education in
disaster nursing in taiwan. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 43 (3):197-202.
[16]. Data dan Informasi Bencana Indonesia (DIBI)-BNPB. (2017). Kajian Data Kejadian Bencana Indonesia. Accessed on September 12 th,
2017, fromhttp://dibi.bnpb.go.id/DesInventar/showdatacard.jsp?clave=2900&nStart.
[17]. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia (Depkes RI). (2012). Pedoman puskesmas dalam penanggulangan bencana.
Jakarta. [18]. Feist, J., & Feist, G. (2010). Teori Kepribadian. Buku 2. Jakarta. Salemba Humanika
[19]. Giesen, R. I. V., Fischer, A. R. H., Dijk, H. V., & Trijp, H. C. M. V. (2015). Affect and cognition in attitude formation toward familiar
and unfamiliar attitude objects. Plos One, 1-14.
[20]. Green, L. (2000). Comunication and Human Behavior. New Jersey. Prentice Hall.
[21]. Hodge, A. J., Miller, E. L., & Skaggs, M. K. D. (2017). Nursing self-perceptions of emergency preparedness at a rural hospital.
[22]. Ibrahim, F. A. A. (2014) Nurses knowledge, attitudes, practices and familiar it regarding disaster and emergency preparedness –
Saudi Arabia. American Journal of Nursing Science, 3(2): 18-25.
[23]. International Council of Nurse (ICN) & World Health Organization (WHO). (2009). ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing
Competencie. WHO/WPRO. Geneva.
[24]. Labrague, L. J., Yboa, B. C., McEnroe–Petitte, D. M., Lobrino, L. R., & Brennan, M. G. B. (2016). Disaster preparedness in philippine
nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(1): 98–105
[25]. Lowery, R., Robinson, C., & Taylor, M. (2017). Readiness near and far: regional hospital emergency preparedness during the 2016
republican national convention. Journal of emergency nursing, 43(3):284-289.
[26]. Magnaye, B., Lindsay, S., Ann, M., Gilbert, & R., Heather, J. (2011). The role preparedness and management of nurses during
disaster. International Scientific Research Journal. 3 (4): 269-294.
[27]. Melnikov, M., Itzhaki, M., & Kagan, L. (2014). Israeli nurses’ intention to report for work in an emergency or disaster. Journal of
Nursing Scholarship, 2014; 46(2):134–142.
[28]. Mitchel, M. L.,MicKinon, L., Atiken, M. L., Weber, S., Birgan, S., & Sykes, S. (2016). Enhancing disaster preparedness of specialty
nurses on a national scale.Disaster Prevention and Management, 25 (1): 11-26.
[29]. Mondargue & Lircones, (2015) . Influence of individu factors with nurse preparedness level. J Disaster Management. 6 (1): 9-20.
[30]. Mustamin, R. (2015). Pengaruh pengetahuan dan sikap dengan kesiapsiagaan tenaga kesehatan dalam menghadapi bencana di
[33]. Odulana, A., Kim, M. M., Green, M., Taylor, Y., Howard, D. L., Godley, P., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2014). Participating in research:
attitudes within the african american church. J Relig Health, 53: 373–381.
[34]. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2008). Keputusan menteri kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1653 tentang
pedoman penanganan bencana bidang kesehatan. Jakarta
[35]. Phetricco, L.G., & Loerzus, B. (2016). Government policies and infrastructure facilities on nurse preparedness for disaster. J
Disaster Management, 12(1): 9-21.
[36]. Pourvakhshoori, N., Norouzi, K., Ahmadi, F., Hosseini, M., Khankeh, M. (2017). Nurse in limbo: A qualitative study of nursing in
disasters in Iranian context. Plos One, 1-12.
[37]. Raes, E., Boon, A., Kyndt, E., & Dochy, F. (2015). Measuring team learning behaviours through observing verbal team interaction.
[38]. Rasyid, H., & Mansur. (2007). Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung. CV Wacana Prima.
[39]. Samuel, P., Griffin, M.T.Q., White, M., & Fitzpatrick, J.J. (2015).Crisis leadership efficacy of nurse practitioners. The Journal for
Nurse Practitioners – JNP. 11 (9): 862-870.
[40]. Shannon, C. C., (2015). Using a simulated mass casualty incident to teach response readiness: a case study. Journal of Nursing
Education, 54 (4): 215-219.
[41]. Suk. M.H., Oh. W.O., Im. Y.J., & Cho.H.N. (2015). Mediating Effect of School Nurses' Self Efficacy between Multicultural Attitude
and Cultural Sensitivity in Korean Elementary Schools.Asian Nursing Research. 9 :194-199.
[42]. Tsai. C.W., Tsai. S.H., Chen. Y.Y., & Lee. W.L. (2014). A study of nursing competency, career self-efficacy and professional
commitment among nurses in Taiwan. Contemporary Nurse.49: 96–102.
[43]. Tuhusetya, S. (2012). Pendidikan kebencanaan dan kesigapan mengurangi risiko. Accessed on December 7 th, 2017,
fromhttp://sawali.com.
[44]. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNSDR). (2014). Terminology on DisasterRisk Reduction.
Switzerland. Jeneva.
[45]. United States Agency for International Development. (USAID). (2013). Early Warning, Preparedness, Mitigation, and Prevention.
Switzerland. Jeneva.
[46]. Veenema, T. G., Griffin, A., Gable, A.R., MacIntyre, L., Simons, N., Couig, M.P., Walsh, J. J., Lavin, R. P., Dobalian, A., & Larson, E. (2017). Nurses as leaders
in disaster preparedness and response-a call to action. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48 (2): 187–200.
[47]. Word Health Organisation (WHO). (2007). Risk reduction and emergency preparedness: WHO six-year strategy for the health sector and community
capacity development, Geneva Switzerland . WHO Press.