LAPORAN KASUS
+ IDENTITAS PASIEN
Nama : An. CBL
Tanggal Lahir : 31/10/2007
Usia : 8 tahun 7 bulan
Alamat : Sekehaji II G2/95, Bandung
Tanggal MRS : 25 Juni 2016
Jam MRS : 16.45 WIB
N
+
Normal
Normal
Normal
Penilaian
+ Primer
Airway : Obstruksi jalan napas : Tidak ada
TGL WBC
25/06
26/06
27/06
28/06
29/06
30/06
01/07
NILAI RUJUKAN
+
HASIL LABORATORIUM
Pemeriksaan Darah 25 Juni 26 Juni 27 Juni 28 Juni 29 Juni 30 Juni 01 Juli Nilai Rujukan
2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016
WBC 4900 3500 (Pkl. 5000-11000
00:28
WIB)
4100 (Pkl.
18:10
WIB)
12,1 (Pkl.
18:10
WIB)
HT 36,9 33,7 34,7 35,7 39,9 (Pkl. 33,0-43,00
00:28
+
108000
(Pkl. 18:10
WIB)
Dengue Positive Negative
NS1
Widal
S. Typhi O 1/32O <1/80
S. Paratyphi 1/80 <1/80
BO
S. Paratyphi 1/80 <1/80
CO
+
HASIL LABORATORIUM
Pemeriksaan 25 Juni 26 Juni 27 Juni 28 Juni 29 Juni 30 Juni 01 Juli Nilai Rujukan
Darah 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016 2016
SGPT 11 30 0-31
Ureum 23 10-50
15
PEMERIKSAAN PENUNJANG
Ad Vitam : ad bonam
Ad Functionam : ad bonam
+
TERIMA KASIH
Trombosit merupakan fragmen
sitoplasma megakariosit
Warning signs
+
+
+
+
+
+ Immunopathogenesis
Immune deviation
Cytokine over-production
Anti-platelet and anti-endothelial cell autoantibody
Antibody-dependent enhancement
Molecular mimicry
Dengue virus-induced vasculopathy and coagulopathy
Lei HY, et al.J Biomed Sci 2001;8:377-88.
DENGUE VIRUS INFECTION
FEVER BLEEDING HEPATOMEGALY INCREASE TROMBOCYTOPENIA
ANOREXIA MANIFESTATION VASCULAR
VOMITING PERMIABILITY
Plasma leakage :
Hemoconcentration
Hipoproteinemia
Dehydration Pleural effusion
Ascites
Hypovolemia
DIC Shock
Demam
Panas tinggi mendadak
Menghilang hari ke-3 atau 4 sembuh
atau
Berkurang hari ke-3 atau 4 lalu timbul lagi
setelah 1 - 3 hari seperti pelana onta
Gejala lain :
Lemah, malaise
Ruam kulit:
Ruam primer:
bercak seperti penyakit campak (makulopapular)
terdapat di daerah dada , lipat sendi
Ruam sekunder:
Setelah hari ke-4,tersering hari ke-6 atau 7
Makulopapular / ptekiae / purpurik / campuran
Konfluen, biasanya kaki dan tangan
Kadang-kadang gatal
Demam Dengue (4)
Perdarahan ?
40 oC
39 oC
38 oC
37 oC
36 oC
Administration of iv fluid
is necessary as patients have a >20% increase of hematocrit
~ 5-8% dehydration
3 mL/kgbw/h
1 gtt/kgbw/min (macro drip)
Improvement 10 mL/kgbw/h
3 gtt/kgbw/min (macro drip)
no improvement
Further Improvement unstable vital signs,
urine output falls,
signs of shock
Vital signs & Ht stable,
Adequate diuresis DHF GRADE III AND IV
Discontinue IV therapy
After 2448 hours
+
DHF GRADE III AND IV
Shock
Oxygenation
Immediate, rapid volume Shock + Look after Ht
Shock improvement replacement
crystalloid 20 mL/kgbw, as iv bolus
colloid 20 ml/kgbw/h
RL 3 ml/kgbw/h
Shock - Shock +
stop
ICU
+
Alarm Signals
Four Criteria for DHF Severe abdominal pain
Fever Prolonged vomoting
Hemorrhagic Abrupt change from
manifestasions fever to hypothermia
Excessive capillary Change in level of
permeability consciousness
100,000/mm3 platelets (irritability or
somnolence)
Initial Warning Signals
Disappearance of When Patients Develop
fever DSS:
Drop in platelets 3 to 6 days after onset
Increase in of symptoms
hematocrite
+
CRITERIA OF DISCHARGED
1. Clinical improvement
2. No fever within 24 hours without antipyretic
3. No respiratory distress
4. Stabilizing of hematocrit
5. Tendency of platelets increase (>50.000/mm3)
6. Three days after shock overcome
7. Increasing of appetite
+
COMMON COLD
+
+
+
+
Virus Influenza
Temperature (C)
5 Kurva demam
4
Oral
3 39
2
1
0 37
Hari 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Provides the best insurance that result was due to the intervention
+
Randomized Clinical Trials
Design of a randomized clinical trial
Defined Population
RANDOMIZED
New Current
Treatment Treatment
1. Historical controls
Exclusion criteria: Patients with comorbid; not expected to live long enough;
patients with contraindication to treatment; patients who refuse to participate;
patients who do not follow instructions during the early stages of the trial.
+
+ Randomized Clinical Trials
Observational Vs Experimental Studies
+
Randomized Clinical Trials
Data Collection on Subjects
It is essential that the data collected for each of the study groups be of the same
quality
2. Outcome
4. Masking (Blinding)
+
BLINDING
1. Allocation concealment
Planned
Unplanned
+
Randomized Clinical Trials
Design of a planned crossover trial
+
Randomized Clinical Trials Unplanned
crossover in a study of cardiac bypass surgery : I.
Original study design
+
Randomized Clinical Trials Unplanned
crossover in a study of cardiac bypass surgery : II.
Reality: Unplanned crossovers
Randomized Clinical Trials
Factorial Design for studying the effects of two treatments
Treatment B
+ -
Both A only
+ A and B
(Cell a) (Cell b)
Treatment A
B only Neither
-
A nor B
(Cell c) (Cell d)
Randomized Clinical Trials
Factorial Design : The effect of treatment A Vs No treatment A
Treatment B
+ -
Both A only
+ A and B
(Cell a) (Cell b)
Treatment A
B only Neither
-
A nor B
(Cell c) (Cell d)
Randomized Clinical Trials
Factorial Design : The effect of treatment B Vs No treatment B
Treatment B
+ -
Both A only
+ A and B
(Cell a) (Cell b)
Treatment A
B only Neither
-
A nor B
(Cell c) (Cell d)