Laporan CCFL

BADAN PENGAWAS OBAT DAN MAKANAN
DIREKTORAT STANDARDISASI PANGAN OLAHAN
NOTA DINAS
NOMOR : SD.03.09.51.511.11.21.614
Kepada Yth :
Deputi Bidang Pengawasan Pangan Olahan
Dari :
Direktur Standardisasi Pangan Olahan
Perihal :
Penyampaian Laporan Mengikuti Sidang Codex Committee on Food
Labelling (CCFL) ke-46
Tanggal : 16 November 2021
_________________________________________________________________________
Sehubungan dengan telah dilaksanakan Sidang Committee on Food Labelling ke-46,

bersama ini kami sampaikan laporan sidang CCFL ke-46 sebagai berikut:
1. Sidang CCFL merupakan sidang komite yang menetapkan penyusunan standar dan
pedoman pelabelan pangan. Sidang CCFL ke-46 beserta rangkaian sidangnya telah
dilaksanakan secara online pada tanggal 21-22 September 2021 (electronic Working
Group on Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling (FOPNL); 27 September – 1 Oktober 2021
(pembahasan agenda sidang); dan 7 Oktober 2021 (adoption report).
2. Sidang dihadiri 95 negara anggota, 1 organisasi anggota, dan observer dari 47 organisasi
internasional antar pemerintah maupun non pemerintah. Sidang dipimpin oleh Kathy
Twardek selaku Chairperson CCFL. Sidang dibuka oleh Dr. Harpreet Kochhar, Associate
Deputy Minister of Health Canada dan sambutan oleh Ms. Mariam Eid (Lebanon), selaku
Vice-Chairpersons CAC dan Mr. Tom Heilandt dari Codex Secretariat.
3. Delegasi Indonesia adalah Direktur Standardisasi Pangan Olahan – selaku Ketua

Delegasi; serta anggota yang terdiri atas Pakar (Dr. Puspo Edi Giriwono, Dr. Rachma
Wikandari), Badan POM (Yeni Restiani, Yusra Egayanti, Sondang Widya Estikasari, Dyah
Setyowati, Erna Rahmawati, Utami Hudi Astuti), Kementerian Kesehatan (Dr. Hera
Nurlita), Kementerian Perdagangan (Ochy Suryatama).
4. Berikut adalah hasil sidang yang perlu menjadi perhatian Badan POM selaku koordinator
mirror committee CCFL:
1. Mencermati lebih lanjut Draft Guidance for the Labelling of Non-Retail Containers dan
Draft Guidelines on Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling yang akan diajukan untuk
diadopsi oleh CAC. Kedua pedoman ini dapat menjadi acuan dalam penetapan
kebijakan di Indonesia.
2. Berpartisipasi aktif dalam pembahasan Proposed Draft Guidelines on Internet
Sales/E-Commerce dan Labelling of Foods in Joint Presentation and Multipack
Formats melalui electronic Working Group maupun Circular Letter yang akan
diedarkan Codex Secretariat.
Dokumen ini telah ditandatangani secara elektronik menggunakan sertifikat elektronik yang diterbitkan oleh Balai Sertifikasi Elektronik (BSrE), BSSN
5. Mencermati hasil sidang, Badan POM perlu melakukan tindak lanjut dengan
melaksanakan koordinasi dengan stakeholder terkait dalam penyiapan posisi Indonesia
khususnya terkait e-commerce serta concern lain yang akan dibahas pada sidang CCFL
selanjutnya.
Demikian disampaikan, mohon arahan Ibu selanjutnya. Terima kasih.
Yunida Nugrahanti Soedarto
LAMPIRAN 1.
LAPORAN
Codex Committee on Food Labelling (CCFL) ke-46 dan Rangkaian Sidangnya
DIREKTORAT STANDARDISASI PANGAN OLAHAN

DEPUTI BIDANG PENGAWASAN PANGAN OLAHAN
BADAN PENGAWAS OBAT DAN MAKANAN RI
2021
LAPORAN CODEX COMMITTEE ON FOOD LABELLING (CCFL) KE-46 DAN
RANGKAIAN SIDANGNYA
A. PENDAHULUAN
Sidang Codex Committee on Food Labelling (CCFL) ke-46 diselenggarakan secara
virtual pada tanggal 27 September – 7 Oktober 2021. Sidang dipimpin oleh Ms. Kathy
Twardek, Senior Director of the Food Program Integration Division, Canadian Food
Inspection Agency. Sidang dihadiri oleh 95 delegasi negara anggota dan 1 anggota
organisasi serta 47 observer.
Sidang dibuka oleh Dr. Harpreet Kochhar, Associate Deputy Minister of Health Canada.
Vice-chairperson Codex Alimentarius Comission (CAC), Ms. Mariam Eid (Lebanon) dan
Mr. Tom Heilandt selaku Codex Secretary, juga turut memberikan sambutan.
B. DISKUSI DAN HASIL SIDANG CCFL KE-46
Berikut hasil sidang CCFL ke-46 yang memerlukan perhatian dan langkah tindak lanjut
Badan POM selaku Koordinator Mirror Committee CCFL maupun Kementerian/Lembaga
terkait:
1. Agenda item 1 Adoption of the Agenda
Komite mengadopsi 13 agenda yang akan dibahas pada .
2. Agenda item 2 Matters referred to the Committee by the CAC and other Codex
Subsidiary Bodies
Komite mencatat beberapa hal berikut dibahas dalam agenda item terkait:
 Ketentuan pelabelan dari CCNFSDU dan CCSCH akan dibahas pada Agenda
Item 4; dan
 Permintaan CCNFSDU terkait profil gizi akan dibahas dalam Agenda Item 6.
3. Agenda item 3 Matters of interest from FAO and WHO

a. FAO
Perwakilan FAO menyampaikan kegiatan FAO, termasuk juga kegiatan
gabungan FAO dan WHO terkait CCFL:
(1) Pertimbangan ilmiah the Joint FAO/WHO terkait penilaian risiko alergen
pangan, yang akan dibahas pada agenda item 8;
(2) kegiatan FAO untuk mendorong implementasi pelabelan pangan pada
usaha mikro dan kecil;
(3) dukungan FAO terhadap kolaborasi multisektor terkait Zero Hunger, Healthy
Diets from Sustainable Food Systems, Food is Never Waste, and School
Meals.
b. Perwakilan WHO menyampaikan update terutama terkait UN Food Sistem
Summit.
c. Komite mencatat informasi yang disampaikan dari FAO dan WHO yang
diantaranya relevan dengan agenda yang dibahas yaitu pelabelan alergen.
4. Agenda item 4 Consideration of labelling provisions in draft Codex standards
a. Sidang menyetujui labelling provisions pada draft standard Codex sebagai
berikut:
1) Regional standard for fermented cooked cassava-based products
2) Regional standard for fresh leaves of Gnetum spp.
3) Draft Regional standard for dried meat
4) Draft Regional standard for fermented Noni fruit juice
5) Regional standard for kava products for use as a beverage when mixed with
water
6) Standard for Kiwi
7) Standard for Garlic
8) Standard for Ware Potatoes
9) Standard for Yam
10) Standard for Mixed Zaatar
11) Review of the Standard for Follow Up Formula : Section A: Follow-Up
Formula for Older Infants, section 9.6.5
12) Draft Standard for Dried Oregano
13) Draft Standard for dried Roots, Rhizomes and Bulbs – Dried or Dehydrated
Ginger
14) Draft Standard for Dried Floral Parts – Cloves
15) Draft Standard for Dried Basil
16) Proposed Draft Standard for Dried Seeds - Nutmeg
b. Terdapat usulan untuk merevisi ketentuan label dalam The General Standard for
Dried Fruits pada Annex C Raisins, pada section 4.2.1 tentang pencantuman
klaim “natural”, yaitu dengan menambahkan ketentuan bahwa harus sesuai
dengan the General Guidelines on Claims (CAC/GL 1-1979).
5. Agenda item 5 Draft Guidance for the Labelling of Non-Retail Containers

a. Komite menyepakati bentuk dokumen berupa standar, sehingga judul dokumen
menjadi General Standard for the Labelling of Non-Retail Containers of Foods.
b. Komite mendiskusikan penggunaan term “should” atau “shall” dalam general
principles, dan diputuskan bahwa yang digunakan adalah “shall”.
c. Pembahasan sub section
 Subsection 5.3
Komite setuju bahwa date marking dan storage instructions harus
dicantumkan jika terkait keamanan dan integritas produk, dan hal ini berarti
memberikan fleksibilitas bahwa date marking dan storage instructions
bersifat sukarela jika tidak terkait keamanan dan integritas produk.
 Subsection 6
Ketentuan 6 (ii) mensyaratkan bahwa semua informasi wajib yang tercantum
dalam General Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods (CXS 1-
1985), termasuk alergen dan daftar bahan, harus ada dalam dokumen yang
menyertainya atau cara lain. Lebih lanjut disebutkan bahwa ketentuan 6 (ii)
ditulis secara ringkas dan lengkap, dan mencakup semua persyaratan wajib
pelabelan pangan.
Komite setuju dengan ketentuan 6 (ii).
 Subsection 7.1
Seorang delegasi mencatat istilah “bulk transport” telah diganti dengan “food
transportation unit” dengan mengacu pada definisinya dalam Code of
Hygienic Practice for the Transport of Food in Bulk and Semi-Packed Food
(CXC 47-2001).
CCFL setuju untuk memasukkan referensi pada definisi “bulk” pada footnote
dalam judul subsection 7.1.
 Subsection 8.2
Untuk ketentuan 8.2.1, Komite setuju mengubah teks untuk lebih
mencerminkan maksud bahwa dalam hal penggunaan bahasa pada label asli
tidak dapat diterima di negara tujuan, maka bahasa yang diterima di negara
tujuan harus menjadi informasi yang wajib, dan terdapat pilihan cara
pencantumannya, misalnya melalui re-labelling maupun label tambahan
(supplementary labelling).
Untuk ketentuan 8.2.2, Komite membahas mengenai perlunya
mengklarifikasi bahwa informasi yang diterjemahkan pada label tambahan
harus sesuai dengan peraturan di negara tujuan. Diklarifikasi bahwa
ketentuan 8.2.1 mencakup pemenuhan persyaratan wajib di negara tujuan,
dan ketentuan 8.2.2 adalah tentang perlunya keakuratan terjemahan
informasi yang wajib. Komite setuju bahwa teks tambahan untuk 8.2.2 tidak
diperlukan.
 CCFL mencatat bahwa semua isu telah dibahas dan disepakati bahwa draf
siap diadopsi pada Step 8.
d. Consequential Amendments to the Procedural Manual
 Chair menjelaskan bahwa Prosedural Manual yang berlaku saat ini
memberikan panduan tentang bagaimana Codex Commodity Standards
mencakup non-retail container dalam kasus di mana ruang lingkup standar
tidak terbatas pada pangan terkemas. Ketika standar non-retail container
diadopsi oleh CAC, pedoman dalam Prosedur Manual menjadi tidak sesuai.
Komite setuju bahwa perubahan konsekuensial diperlukan dalam
Prosedural Manual (Format for Codex Commodity Standards, section on
labelling).
 CCFL membahas consequential amendment yang diusulkan dan
menyetujui bahwa revisi tersebut akan mencakup referensi ke standar non-
retail containers.
e. Kesimpulan: Komite setuju untuk
 meneruskan kepada CAC44 untuk mengadopsi draf standar pada Step 8 dan
mengadopsi the consequential amendment to the Procedural Manual.
 merekomendasikan bahwa CAC44 meminta Commodity Committees untuk
meninjau ketentuan pelabelan non-retail container, sehubungan dengan
adanya new standard for the labelling of non-retail containers.
6. Agenda Item 6 Proposed Draft Guidelines on Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling

a. Draft guideline merupakan bagian dari the Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling
(CXG 2-1985) pada Annex II.
b. Komite menyepakati untuk menambahkan klausul yang menegaskan bahwa
FOPNL bersifat voluntary atau mandatory, tergantung pada kebijakan negara.
c. Amandemen pada Section 5 The Guideines on Nutrition Labelling (CXG 2-1985)
dengan memberikan footnote sebagai penjelasan bahwa prinsip-prinsip FOPNL
sebagaimana dalam draft Guidelines on Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling,
terlampir sebagai Annex.
d. CCFL mempertimbangkan laporan EWG beserta rekomendasinya, dan
menyetujui sebagian besar rekomendasi. Selain itu, membuat komentar dan
keputusan berikut:
 Scope
CCFL setuju dengan usulan ruang lingkup, namun juga mencatat
tanggapan Federasi Rusia terhadap daftar pengecualian di bagian 2.2.
Pandangan Federasi Rusia bahwa pengecualian tidak hanya didasarkan
pada Standar Codex seperti yang tercantum dalam 2.2, tetapi juga pada
kategori pangan yang lebih komprehensif seperti minuman beralkohol,
komponen pangan tunggal (misalnya minyak, air, gula, keju), serta
suplemen pangan tidak diperbolehkan untuk FOPNL agar tidak
menyesatkan konsumen. Terkait tambahan pengecualian tersebut, CCFL
menyerahkan ke negara masing-masing.
 Definition
- CCFL setuju untuk mengubah definisi dengan menyertakan
pernyataan FOPNL dapat bersifat sukarela atau wajib sesuai dengan
undang-undang nasional. CCFL juga mencatat tanggapan Federasi
Rusia yang menganggap jika FOPNL wajib akan bertentangan
dengan bagian 5 dari CXG 2-1985 yang menunjukkan bahwa
penggunaan informasi nutrisi tambahan harus opsional. Oleh sebab
itu, CCFL menyerahkan konsep wajib atau sukarela sesuai dengan
keputusan negara.
- CCFL setuju untuk menghapus section 3.2 dari bagian Definisi.
 Section 4 – Principles for the establishment of FOPNL system
CCFL setuju untuk mempertahankan prinsip-prinsip sebagaimana telah
diubah. Pada pembahasan ini, CCFL juga setuju untuk menghapus teks
dalam tanda kurung siku jika tidak diperlukan. Selain itu, CCFL setuju
mengubah Prinsip 9 untuk menunjukkan bahwa pendidikan konsumen
atau penyediaan informasi harus sejalan dengan rekomendasi pemerintah,
sehingga hal ini akan mengatasi masalah potensi konflik kepentingan.
 Other issues / new principles
CCFL setuju untuk tidak memasukkan prinsip baru dan mempertahankan
Prinsip 3 untuk tidak berubah. Namun, Uni Eropa dan Negara Anggotanya
menyatakan keberatan pada Prinsip 3 karena tidak menunjukkan bahwa
FOPNL harus objektif dan tidak diskriminatif. Terkait hal ini, perwakilan
WHO mencatat bahwa konsep non-diskriminasi secara teknis tidak sesuai
dengan tujuan dan sasaran FOPNL.
 Location of the Guidelines
CCFL setuju bahwa Pedoman akan menjadi annex dari Guidelines on
Nutrition Labelling dan dengan pertimbangan keputusan ini setuju untuk
memasukkan footnote ke section 5 dari CXG 2-1985 untuk referensi annex
baru.
 Matter referred by CCNFSDU
CCFL mencatat bahwa pekerjaannya tidak bergantung pada pekerjaan
profil nutrisi di CCNFSDU, sehingga diskusi tentang FOPNL telah selesai.
e. CCFL setuju untuk mengajukan kepada CAC44 untuk:
 Mengadopsi pada Step 5/8 dan dimasukkan sebagai Annex pada
Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling (CXG2-1985);
 Mengajukan amandemen Section 5 Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling ke
CAC44 untuk diadopsi;
 Menginformasikan CCNFSDU bahwa pekerjaan pada Pedoman FOPNL
telah selesai dan tidak tergantung pada pekerjaan pada profil nutrisi di
CCNFSDU.
7. Agenda Item 7 Proposed Draft Guidelines on Internet Sales/E-Commerce

a. United Kingdom sebagai EWG Chair menyampaikan hal-hal yang disepakati
dalam EWG, diantaranya ruang lingkup (scope) pedoman meliputi penjualan
pangan terkemas dan bukan pangan curah (loose food), serta ketentuan
informasi tentang pangan.
b. Chair juga mengklarifikasi bahwa teks pedoman akan menjadi teks tambahan
sebagai lampiran GSLPF dan bukan pedoman tersendiri. Dalam rangka diskusi
dalam sidang CCFL46, dokumen CRD4 telah disiapkan dengan
mempertimbangkan komentar terhadap CL2021/20/OCS-FL dan beberapa
koreksi telah dilakukan terhadap konsistensi penggunaan terms and definitions,
penyertaan kata-kata untuk mengklarifikasi bahwa pengecualian unit kecil yang
diuraikan dalam Section 6 GSLPF tidak berlaku. Pencantuman alergen dan
informasi gizi juga telah masuk dalam teks. CCFL setuju bahwa CRD4 menjadi
bahan diskusi.
c. Diskusi
 Title
Meskipun terdapat kesepakatan umum bahwa teks yang diusulkan akan
menjadi lampiran GSLPF, salah satu delegasi tidak setuju dengan judul yang
diusulkan karena berpandangan bahwa persyaratan pelabelan untuk e-
commerce adalah wajib, karena penggunaan e-commerce dapat bervariasi
antar negara dan kemajuan teknologi dapat mempengaruhi pelabelan untuk
e-commerce. Oleh karena itu, delegasi ini mengusulkan agar judul tersebut
dipertimbangkan kembali dan bahwa teks harus memberikan lebih banyak
fleksibilitas.
Selain itu, delegasi lain menyatakan bahwa bagaimana teks ini ditempatkan
dalam lampiran dapat mempengaruhi diskusi tentang referensi Guidelines on
Nutrition Labelling karena pedoman ini tidak dirujuk dalam GSLPF, dan
dengan demikian pertimbangan harus diberikan untuk konsistensi
penempatan persyaratan pelabelan gizi untuk e-commerce maupun
penjualan pangan secara fisik.
 Section 1. Scope
Beberapa delegasi mengusulkan perubahan untuk lebih memperjelas bahwa
informasi tentang pangan harus tersedia di halaman informasi produk (e-
page) atau pada titik penjualan e-commerce, dan bahwa teks tidak berlaku
untuk informasi yang akan tersedia pada saat pengiriman (point of delivery)
karena informasi tersebut telah diatur dalam GSLPF. CCFL tidak
menetapkan keputusan tertentu, namun secara umum menyetujui konsep
dalam Scope.
 Section 2. Definition of terms
Fokus pembahasan adalah definisi yang sesuai untuk “e-commerce”,
terdapat usulan untuk menggunakan definisi seperti yang ditetapkan WTO
mengingat sudah lazim digunakan dan dipahami. Berbagai pandangan
disampaikan terhadap usulan tersebut, namun tidak ada keputusan CCFL
terkait definisi “e-commerce”.
 Section 3. General principles
1) CCFL setuju untuk mengubah paragraf pertama agar lebih jelas, menjadi
sebagai berikut: “The General Principles in Section 3 of the GSLPF
apply.”
2) EWG Chair menegaskan bahwa maksud dari general principles adalah
untuk memastikan bahwa pangan yang dijual melalui e-commerce akan
diberi label seperti yang dipersyaratkan oleh GSLPF saat dikirimkan ke
konsumen.
 Komite sepakat bahwa EWG, dengan UK sebagai Chair dan Chile, Ghana,
India, dan Jepang sebagai co-Chair akan menyusun kembali draft ini dan
mengedarkan pada step 3 untuk dibahas pada Sidang CCFL47.
8. Agenda Item 8 Food Allergen Labelling

a. Proposed Draft Revision to the General Standard for the Labelling of
Prepackaged Foods – Provisions Relevant to Allergen Labelling (Agenda
Item 8.1)
CCFL setuju untuk melakukan diskusi umum tentang usulan draft proposal revisi
dan mengumpulkan komentar untuk didiskusikan lebih lanjut dalam EWG, dan
tidak mengambil keputusan atas rekomendasi/usulan oleh anggota dan
observer.
 General discussion
Daftar bahan pangan penyebab alergi berdasarkan laporan the Ad hoc Joint
FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Risk Assessment of Food Allergens akan
menjadi bahan pertimbangan.
 Scope
Ruang lingkup harus diperluas sehingga termasuk pangan tidak terkemas
(non prepackaged foods) di perusahaan katering.
 Definitions
Definisi “allergen” dan “food allergen” perlu dilihat kembali, serta penting
untuk dipertimbangkan bahwa alergen tidak selalu protein, namun juga
senyawa lain misalnya glikoprotein dan karbohidrat, yang bagi beberapa
orang dapat menyebabkan reaksi alergi. Terdapat pandangan juga untuk
memastikan konsistensi definisi dalam the Code of Practice for Allergen
Management for Food Business Operators (CXC 80–2020)
 List of Ingredients 4.2.1.4
- Laktosa dan sulfit seharusnya dikeluarkan dari daftar karena tidak
menyebabkan reaksi alergi, walaupun keduanya menyebabkan food
intolerances
- Perlu dipertimbangkan penggunaan istilah yang obyektif dibanding nama
umum, karena pangan bervariasi di tiap daerah
- Perlu ditetapkan cara lain untuk menyediakan informasi alergen jika tidak
dimungkinkan pencantuman bahan pada kemasan kecil
- Terdapat usulan untuk memasukkan wijen dalam daftar alergen
- Untuk alergen yang tidak ada dalam daftar, perlu dibuat “watch list” untuk
membantu meningkatkan kesadaran konsumen
- Kedelai seharusnya tidak dikeluarkan dari daftar
- Serealia seharusnya tetap berada dalam daftar, namun perlu dipastikan
agar selaras dengan the Standard for foods for special dietary uses for
persons intolerant to gluten (CXS 118-1979, yang juga mencakup spelt;
mengingat spelt biasanya tidak selalu dikenal sebagai wheat cereal.
b. Proposed Draft Guidance on Precautionary Allergen Labelling (Agenda

Item 8.2)
Sidang menyetujui untuk melanjutkan pembahasan ini melalui eWG untuk
membahas lebih lanjut tanggapan yang diterima melalui circular letter maupun
CRDs.
9. Agenda Item 9 Innovation-Use of Technology in Food Labelling (Discussion

Paper)
Komite setuju untuk :
(i) memulai pekerjaan baru tentang the use of technology in food labelling dan
menyerahkan project document untuk disetujui CAC44; dan
(ii) membentuk EWG dengan Canada sebagai Chair untuk menyiapkan draft untuk
dikomentari pada Step 3 dan untuk dipertimbangkan oleh CCFL47
10. Agenda Item 10 Labelling of Alcoholic Beverages (Discussion Paper)

a. Rusia memaparkan pembahasan agenda ini dan menjelaskan tanggapan
terhadap CL2019/86-FL untuk melanjutkan pekerjaan, dengan catatan ada
pemisahan yang jelas terkait pertanyaan apakah pelabelan alkohol memerlukan
panduan atau standar khusus dalam Codex. Rusia menyatakan kesediaan untuk
terus mengembangkan makalah diskusi dan mengusulkan agar informasi lebih
lanjut mengacu pada jawaban yang telah diterima melalui CL2019/86-FL, harus
dimintai kembali melalui CL. Perwakilan WHO dan EUROCARE menyatakan
siap mendukung dan berkontribusi pada pengembangan makalah diskusi.
b. Komite menyetujui Rusia, Uni Eropa dan India dengan bantuan dari WHO dan
EUROCARE akan menyiapkan makalah diskusi untuk dipertimbangkan oleh
CCFL47; dan akan mengedarkan CL kembali untuk meminta informasi guna
membantu pengembangan makalah diskusi.
11. Agenda Item 11 Labelling of Foods in Joint Presentation and Multipack

Formats (Discussion Paper)
a. Sidang menyetujui pembahasan lebih lanjut tentang labelling of foods in joint
presentation and multipack formats. Diperlukan tinjauan definisi foods in joint
presentation and multipack formats di dalam GSLPF.
b. Colombia menjelaskan bahwa Komite telah mengedarkan CL untuk
mengumpulkan informasi tentang praktik saat ini, masalah, dan peran potensial
terkait CCFL dalam area ini. Secara umum dapat disimpulkan bahwa belum
terdapat definisi yang jelas terkait pelabelan pengemasan pangan jenis ini.
Komite mempertimbangkan kemungkinan amandemen terhadap GSLPF untuk
mengakomodir pengemasan pangan seperti ini.
c. Komite sepakat meminta Colombia utk menyiapkan discussion paper lebih lanjut
dan mengedarkan kembali CL untuk mendapatkan masukan dari negara
anggota.
12. Agenda Item 12 Future Work and Direction of CCFL (Discussion Paper)
Beberapa discussion paper yang akan disusun:
a. New work on Trans Fatty Acids (disiapkan Canada)
b. Sustainability Claims (disiapkan New Zealand)
13. Agenda Item 13 Approach and Criteria for Evaluation and Prioritization of Work
of CCFL
a. Codex akan mengedarkan dokumen CX/FL 21/46/13 Add.1 melalui circular letter
untuk dikomentari; dan
b. The CCFL Canadian Secretariat akan merevisi dokumen tersebut dengan
mempertimbangkan komentar terhadap circular letter dan diterima di CCFL46
melalui CRDs untuk dipertimbangkan oleh CCFL47.
14. Agenda Item 14 Other Business

Tidak ada informasi tambahan yang disampaikan dalam sidang ini.
15. Agenda Item 15 Date and Place of the Next Session

Sidang selanjutnya akan dilaksanakan 18 bulan ke depan dengan waktu dan tempat
yang akan diinformasikan kemudian.
C. TINDAK LANJUT
Badan POM selaku koordinator mirror committee CCFL perlu terus mencermati dan
berpartisipasi aktif dalam pembahasan agenda Sidang CCFL sebagai berikut:
1. Mencermati lebih lanjut Draft Guidance for the Labelling of Non-Retail Containers dan
Draft Guidelines on Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling yang akan diajukan untuk
diadopsi oleh CAC. Kedua pedoman ini dapat menjadi acuan dalam penetapan
kebijakan di Indonesia.
2. Berpartisipasi aktif dalam pembahasan Proposed Draft Guidelines on Internet Sales/E-
Commerce dan Labelling of Foods in Joint Presentation and Multipack Formats melalui
electronic Working Group maupun Circular Letter yang akan diedarkan Codex
Secretariat.
3. Badan POM perlu melakukan tindak lanjut dengan melaksanakan koordinasi dengan
stakeholder terkait dalam penyiapan posisi Indonesia khususnya terkait e-commerce
serta concern lain yang akan dibahas pada sidang CCFL selanjutnya.
D. LAMPIRAN
POSISI INDONESIA PADA SIDANG CCFL
1. AGENDA ITEM 5 DRAFT GUIDANCE FOR THE LABELLING OF NON-RETAIL

CONTAINERS
Comments to CL 2021/45/OCS-FL - Request for comments on the draft guidance

for the labelling of non-retail containers
Consider the revised draft guidance on labelling of non-retail containers taking into account
the analysis provided in CX/FL 21/46/5 Add.1 and to comment on whether it is ready to
be advanced to Step 8 for adoption by CAC44 (see Annex I of CX/FL 21/46/5 Add.1)
Annex I of CX/FL 21/46/5 Add.1

DRAFT GUIDANCE FOR THE LABELLING OF NON-RETAIL CONTAINERS OF
FOODS
(Proposed amendments in response to comments from CL 2019/85-FL)
DRAFT GUIDANCE FOR THE LABELLING OF

NON-RETAIL CONTAINERS OF FOODS
Indonesia Comments
(Proposed amendments in response to
comments from CL 2019/85-FL)
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of [these Guidelines] / [this Standard]

is to facilitate appropriate harmonized labelling of
non-retail containers of food and to outline what
information shall be presented on the label and
what information, while not required on the label,
must be provided for with a non-retail container by
other means
2. SCOPE
[These Guidelines] / [This Standard] [apply]
/[applies] to the labelling of non-retail containers
of food (excluding food additives and
processing aids) 1,2not intended to be offered
directly to the consumer 1 including the
information provided in the accompanying
physical documents or by other means, and the
presentation thereof.
3. DEFINITION OF TERMS
For the purpose of [these Guidelines] / [this
Standard], the relevant definitions in the General
Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods
(CXS 1-1985) apply. In addition, the following
terms have the meaning as defined below:
Indonesia Comments
“Food Business” means an entity or

undertaking, carrying out one or more
activity(ies) related to any stage(s) of production,
processing, packaging, storage and distribution
(including trade) of food1.
“Non-retail container” means any container 1

that is not intended to be offered for direct sale
to the consumer1. The food1 in the non-retail
containers is for further food business activities
before being offered to the consumer1.
4. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
The following general principles apply to the
labelling of non retail containers:
4.1 The general principles established in
the General Standard for the Labelling
of Prepackaged Foods (GSLPFCXS 1-
1985) apply equally, as appropriate, to
the labelling of non-retail containers of
foods.
4.2 The labelling requirements for non-retail

containers of foods should be
differentiated clearly from the labelling
requirements for prepackaged1 foods.
4.3 The nNon-retail containers should be

clearly identifiable as such.
4.4 The non-retail status of a container shall

be determined by the food business
selling or distributing the container of
food
4.5 The labelling requirements for non-retail

containers should be established taking
into account the information
requirements and implementation
capabilities of the relevant stakeholders
(food businesses and competent
authorities).
4.6 Subject to the requirements outlined in

Section 5, the information requirements in
respect of non- retail containers of food
may be met through means other than
on a label as allowed by the competent
authority in the country in which it is sold.
Indonesia Comments
4.7 The label and information in the

accompanying documents or information
provided by other means shall be
traceable to the food in the non-retail
container and shall provide information to
enable the labelling of food, intended for
sale to the consumer.
5. MANDATORY INFORMATION
REQUIREMENTS ON THE LABEL:
The following information shall appear on the
label of non-retail containers of food:
5.1 The name of the food

5.1.1 The name shall indicate the
true nature of the food and
normally be specific and not
generic.
5.1.1.1 Where a name or names

have been established for a
food in a Codex standard, at
least one of these names
shall be used.
5.1.1.2 In other cases, the name

prescribed by national
legislation shall be used.
5.1.1.3 In the absence of any such

established or prescribed
name, either a common or
usual name existing by
common usage as an
appropriate descriptive term
which is not misleading or
confusing to the food business
or in the country in which the
food is intended to be sold
shall be used.
5.1.1.4 A “coined”, “fanciful”, “brand”

name or “trade mark” may be
used provided it
accompanies one of the
names provided in
Subsections 5.1.1.1 to
5.1.1.3.
5.1.1.5 Where the non-retail container

contains multiple types of
Indonesia Comments
food, the names of all the

foods contained therein
and/or a commonly
understood descriptor that
best explains the foods
present together in the
container shall be provided on
the label, as allowed by the
competent authority in the
country in which the product
is sold.
5.2 Lot identification

Each non-retail container shall be marked in
code or in a manner to clearly identify the
producing production factory and the lot.
5.3 Date marking and storage Indonesia proposes modification in section 5.3
instructions3 as follows (in bold and underlined):
Date marking and storage instructions
shall be provided only when they are
related to the safety and integrity of the
5.3 Date marking and storage instructions3
product. Date marking and storage instructions shall
be provided on the non-retail container. only
when they are related to the safety and
integrity of the product.
Storage instructions shall be provided on

the label of a non-retail container where the
absence of special storage conditions would
compromise the safety of the product.
If no special storage instructions were

required, the storage instructions could
appear on accompanying documents to a
non-retail container
5.4 Identification of a non-retail Indonesia proposes to revise the second bullet

container as follows:
The non-retail containers of foods shall be  carry any other mark that indicates that
clearly identifiable as such. If the container is
the container is not intended to be sold
not clearly identifiable as a non-retail
directly to a the consumer
container, the container shall:
 bear a statement to indicate that
the food is not intended to be sold
directly to the consumer2 1 or to
clearly identify it as a non-retail
Indonesia Comments
container. Some examples of such

statements are:
“NON-RETAIL CONTAINER”
“NON-RETAILCONTAINER - NOT
FOR DIRECT SALE TO
CONSUMER”
Or,
 carry any other mark that indicates
that the container is not intended to
be sold directly to a consumer
5.5 Name and address

Name and address of the manufacturer,
packer, distributor, importer, exporter or
vendor of the food shall be declared.
5.6 Where a non retail container contains

multiple types of food, the information in respect
of all the above provisions in Section 5 should be
provided for all the foods contained therein.
Indonesia proposes to accommodate a new

mandatory information requirements as
follows:
5.6 Net contents of the non-retail

container
This information can be directly seen by food

business.
6. MANDATORY INFORMATION
REQUIREMENTS BY MEANS OTHER
THAN ON THE LABEL
6.1 The information that shall be provided in Indonesia proposes to:

the accompanying documents, or through
other appropriate means, is the following: - move the content in point iii into section
5.6 (new); and
i. Information provided on the label as
identified in Section 5; - add new point iii (in bold and underlined)
ii. If not all on the label: Information sufficient to so the section 6.1 become as follows:
enable the safe preparation and the labelling
of pre-packaged foods from the food in the
non-retail container;
Indonesia Comments
iii. Net contents of the non-retail container. 6.1 The information that shall be provided in
the accompanying documents, or through
other appropriate means, is the following:
i. Information provided on the label as

identified in Section 5;
ii. If not all on the label: Information sufficient

to enable the safe preparation and the
labelling of pre-packaged foods from the
food in the non-retail container;
iii. Net contents of the non-retail container List

of Ingredients
6.2 The information provided in the accompanying

documents, or through other appropriate means,
shall be effectively traceable to the food in non-
retail container
6.3 If all mandatory information is made

available on the label, provisions of 6.1 and 6.2
need not apply.
7. [BULK TRANSPORT PROVISIONS FOR

SPECIFIC TYPES OF NON-RETAIL
CONTAINERS
7.1 Non-retail container used as food

transportation unit 5]
In the case of a non-retail container used as a

food transportation unit bulk transport
containers such as shipping containers, tankers,
barges, drums, etc., that is are not amenable to
possess a label, all the information stipulated in
sections 5 and 6 shall be provided in the
accompanying documents or through appropriate
other means (e.g. electronically between food
businesses) and
shall be effectively traceable to the food in such

containers.
Indonesia Comments
7.2 Non-retail container containing multiple

types of food
5.6 Where a non-retail container contains multiple

types of food, the mandatory information in
respect of all the above provisions in required by
Section 5 on the label and section 6 through
means other than on the label should shall be
provided for all the types of foods contained
therein.
7.3 8 [EXEMPTION Non-retail container

providing visual access]
In the case of a non-retail container, which

provides visual and legible access to all the
information required by section 5 on the label of
pre-packaged foods within the non-retail
container, the information stipulated in section 5 is
not required.
8. 9. PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION
8.1 9.1 General
8.1.1 9.1.1 Labels on non-retail containers of

foods shall be applied in such a manner
that they will not become separated from
the container.
8.1.2 9.1.2 Information and the statements

required to appear on the label by virtue
of [these Guidelines]/ [this Standard] or
any other Codex Standards shall be clear,
prominent, readily legible and applied in
such a manner that any tampering with
it will be evident.
8.1.3 9.1.3 The mandatory information Indonesia proposes to add the word ‘container’
requirements on label (Section 5 on section 8.1.3 as follows:
above) shall appear in a prominent
position on the non-retail and in the
same field of vision shall be readily 8.1.3 9.1.3 The mandatory information
accessible under normal handling requirements on label (Section 5 above)
and use of the container. shall appear in a prominent position on the
non-retail containers and in the same field
8.1.4 9.1.4 Information that is provided by of vision shall be readily accessible under
means other than the label shall be normal handling and use of the container.
readily accessible, discernible legible
Indonesia Comments
and clearly displayed.
8.2 9.2 Language
8.2.1 9.2.1 If the language in the original

labelling is not acceptable to the
competent authority or the food business
in the country in which the product is
sold, a translation of the information in
the labelling should be provided in the
required language in the form of re-
labelling, supplementary label and/or in
the accompanying documents or by
means other than on the label
appropriate means to meet the
requirements of the country in which
the product is sold. If re-labelling or a
supplementary label is used, it shall
not obscure the original label.
8.2.2 9.2.2 The information provided through

translation in the required language shall
fully and accurately reflect that in the
original labelling.
b. Consider whether the final document should be adopted as Standard or a Guideline

keeping in view the clarification provided by the Codex secretariat at CCFL45 (see para.
3a of CX/FL 21/46/5 Add.1).
Indonesia considers that this document should be developed as guidelines.
c. To consider the proposed draft amendment to the Procedural Manual for adoption by
CAC44 (see Annex II of CX/FL 21/46/5 Add.1). Do you agree with the proposed
amendment to the PM?
CX/FL 21/46/5 Add.1 Annex II

Comment to Proposed draft amendment to the Procedural Manual
Section II Elaboration of Codex Standards and Related Texts: Format for Codex
Commodity Standards: Section on labelling
Proposed draft amendment to the Procedural Manual
Section II Elaboration of Codex Standards and Related Indonesia Comments

Texts: Format for Codex Commodity Standards: Section
on labelling
Replace the following:

Where the scope of the Standard is not limited to pre-
packaged goods, a provision for labelling of non-
retail containers may be included:
In such cases the provision may specify that:
“Information on ……12 shall be given either on the
container or in accompanying documents, except that
the name of product, lot identification, and the name
and address of the manufacturer or packer shall
appear on the container.13
However, lot identification, and the name and address of the
manufacturer or packer may be replaced by an
identification mark provided that such a mark is
clearly identifiable with the accompanying
documents.”
12 Codex Committees should decide which provisions
are to be included
13 Codex Committees may decide that further

information is required on the container. In this
regard, special attention should be given to the need
for storage instructions to be included on the
container.
Indonesia agrees with the

With:
proposed amendment to the
Where the scope of the Standard is not limited to pre- Procedural Manual.
packaged foods, a provision for the labelling of non-
retail containers may be included as follows:
“The labelling of non-retail containers should be in
accordance with the Guidance (Standard/Guideline)
on the Labelling of Non-Retail Containers.”
2. AGENDA ITEM 6 PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES ON FRONT-OF-PACK NUTRITION
LABELLING
COMMENTS TO PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES ON FRONT-OF-PACK NUTRITION

LABELLING
(for comments at Step 3 through CL 2021/19/OCS-FL)
PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES ON FRONT- INDONESIA COMMENTS

OF-PACK NUTRITION LABELLING
1. PURPOSE:
Provide general guidance to assist in the

development of front-of-pack nutrition
labelling, a form of supplementary
nutrition information, as a tool to
facilitate the consumer’s understanding
of the nutritional value of the food and
their choice of food, consistent with the
national dietary guidance or health and
nutrition policy of the country or region
of implementation.
2. SCOPE:
2.1 These guidelines apply to front-of-

pack nutrition labelling (FOPNL) to be
used on pre-packaged foods3 that
include a nutrient declaration4 subject
to the section 5 of Guidelines on
Nutrition Labelling (CXG 2-1985).
2.2 Alcoholic beverages and foods for Indonesia prefers to use the previous
special dietary uses covered by the section 2.2 and it is up to the country to
following Codex standards are excluded: decide whether a FOPNL system is required
for a specific food based on the needs of the
[Guidelines on Formulated Complementary population.
Foods for Older Infants and Young Children
(CXG 8-1991)] Standard for Infant Formula 2.2 Alcoholic beverages and foods for
and Formulas for Special Medical Purposes special dietary uses and foods for special
Intended for Infants (CXS 72-1981) [Standard medical purposes as defined in the Codex
for Canned Baby Foods (CXS 73-1981)] standards are excluded
[Standard for Processed Cereal-Based Foods

for Infants and Young Children (CXS 74-
1981)] Standard for Follow-up formula (CXS
156-1987)
Standard for Labelling of and Claims for Foods

for Special Medical Purposes (CXS 180-1991)
Standard for Formula Foods for Use in Weight
Control Diets (CXS 181-1991)
Standard for Formula Foods for Use in Very

Low Energy Diets for Weight Reduction (CXS
203-1995)
2.3 Additionally, certain prepackaged

foods may be exempted5 from FOPNL.
These may include foods exempted
from bearing a nutrient declaration on
the basis of nutritional or dietary
insignificance or small packaging as
described in the Guidelines on Nutrition
Labelling (CXG 2-1985).
These guidelines can also be used as a

guide in the case where simplified
nutrition information is displayed near
the food (e.g. shelf-tags or food service),
for unpackaged foods or for foods sold
via online (e.g. information available at
point of purchase on websites).
3. DEFINITION OF FRONT-OF-PACK
NUTRITION LABELLING (FOPNL)
For the purposes of these guidelines:
3.1. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling
(FOPNL) is a form of supplementary
nutrition information that presents
simplified, nutrition information on the front-
of-pack6 of pre-packaged foods.7 It can
include symbols/graphics, text or a
combination thereof that provide
information on the overall nutritional value
of the food and/or on nutrients included in
the FOPNL at a national level.
3.2. This definition excludes nutrition and health

claims.8
4. PRINCIPLES FOR THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF FOPNL
SYSTEMS
A FOPNL should be based on the following
principles in addition to the general principles
in the General Standard for the Labelling of
Prepackaged Foods (CXS 1-1985):
Only one FOPNL system should be

recommended by government in each country.
However, if multiple FOPNL systems coexist,

these should be complementary, not
contradictory to each other.
FOPNL should be calculated and applied to the

food in a manner consistent with the
corresponding nutrient declaration for that food
where applicable.
FOPNL should align with evidence-based

national or regional dietary guidance or, in its
absence, health and nutrition policies.
Consideration should be given to both the
nutrients and the food groups consumption of
which is discouraged and encouraged by these
documents.
FOPNL should present information in a way

that is easy to understand and use by
consumers in the country or region of
implementation. The format of the FOPNL
should be supported by scientifically valid
consumer research.
FOPNL should be clearly visible on the

package at the point of purchase under normal
conditions. FOPNL should allow consumers to
make comparisons between foods.
FOPNL should be government lead but

developed in collaboration with all interested
parties including private sector, consumers,
academia, public health associations among
others.
[FOPNL should be implemented in a way that

Indonesia proposes to open the square
facilitates consumer use of the FOPNL].
brackets and modify the following principle:
[FOPNL should be implemented in a way
that facilitates consumer to understand
and use of the FOPNL].
FOPNL should be accompanied by a consumer Indonesia proposes to add the following

awareness and education/ information
sentence to this principle:
program to increase consumer understanding
and use of the system. FOPNL should be accompanied by a
consumer awareness and education/
information program to increase consumer
understanding and use of the system. The
program should be government lead but

developed in collaboration with all
interested parties.
FOPNL should be monitored and evaluated to
determine effectiveness/impact.
COMMENTS ON CL QUESTIONS
QUESTIONS INDONESIA COMMENTS
Q.1: Do you confirm the Committee majority Yes, Indonesia agrees to delete section 5
preference to delete Section 5 and to since the relevant aspects such as
incorporate relevant aspects from Section 5 to monitoring, evaluation and consumer
Section 4? education programmes are already
mentioned in Section 4.
Q.2 Do you agree that the proposed text for Yes, Indonesia agrees that the proposed text
principle 4.3.1 manages the potential for conflict could manage the potential conflict of
of interest in the development of a FOPNL interest.
system?
Q.3 Do you agree with the change in focus for Yes, Indonesia agrees that the objective of
principle 4.3.2 to focus on facilitating consumer FOPNL is to facilitate consumers to use the
use of FOPNL? information from FOPNL rather than the use
by the food manufacturers
Q.4 Considering the proposed changes to the

principles, do you agree with deleting the
principple groupings?
Q.5 Which of the following options do you prefer Indonesia prefers the guideline on FOPNL
for the placement of the Guidelines on FOPNL: is placed as an Annex to section 5.
 part of section 5 of the Guidelines on Nutrition

Labelling (CXG 2-1985)
 as an Annex to section 5 of the Guidelines on

Nutrition Labelling (CXG 2-1985)
 a stand-alone document
3. AGENDA ITEM 7 PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES ON INTERNET SALES/ E-
COMMERCE
COMMENTS TO PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDANCE ON THE FOOD INFORMATION

REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPACKAGED FOODS TO BE OFFERED VIA E-
COMMERCE
(for comments through CL 2021/20/OCS-FL)
1) Review the proposed draft guidance on the food information requirements for pre-
packaged foods to be offered via e-commerce (Appendix II) and consider whether it
can be advanced to Step 5.
Indonesia considers that the revised draft guidelines need to be further

discussed before advancing to be adopted at step 5.
PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDANCE ON THE FOOD INDONESIA COMMENTS

INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPACKAGED FOODS TO BE OFFERED VIA
E-COMMERCE (for comments through CL
2021/20/OCS-FL)
1. Scope
This text applies to the provision of food information
that shall be available on the product information e
page, or its equivalent, of any consumer–facing
transactional digital platform, and certain aspects
relating to the presentation thereof, in respect of pre-
packaged foods to be offered via e-commerce. It
clarifies which food information shall be provided at
the point of e-commerce sale.
2. Definition of terms
The following terms shall be used in conjunction
with, Section 2 of the GSLPF (CXS 1-1985).
“e-commerce” A transaction via e-commerce is the

sale or purchase of pre-packaged foods, conducted
over computer networks, through web, extranet or
electronic data interchange, by methods specifically
designed for the purpose of receiving or placing of
orders. The pre-packaged foods are ordered by
those methods, but the payment of the food does
not have to be conducted online.
2021/20/OCS-FL)
“Food information” Information concerning a food

made available to the final consumer on the digital
product information page.
“At the point of e-commerce sale” The moment

when consumers decide to make the purchasing
order regardless of making any payment.
“At the point of delivery” The moment when

consumers receive pre-packaged food.
“Minimum durability” The period (e.g. in hours,

days, months etc.) between the point of delivery and
the best before or use-by date, as applicable.
“Product information e-page” The virtual space

on any consumer–facing transactional digital
platform, which is intended to make information
available to facilitate an informed e-commerce
activity.
3. General Principles
As indicated in section 3 of the GSLPF (CXS 1-
1985).
All food information requirements within the GSLPF
and any other Codex texts shall be met at the point
of delivery through the information provided on the
product label, unless specified otherwise within this
text.
4. Information requirements for pre-packaged

foods sold through e-commerce
Information specified in sections 4 and 5 of the

GSLPF (CXS 1-1985) shall, whenever possible,
appear on the product information e-page or other
primary consumer-facing virtual depiction of pre-
packaged foods presented for sale through e-
commerce prior to the point of e-commerce sale,
2021/20/OCS-FL)
except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in

an individual Codex standard and as noted in
Section 5 (“Exemptions from Food Information
requirements”) of this guidance.
In some circumstances it may not be possible to Indonesia proposes to delete

provide accurate information on the product some texts in Para 2, as follows:
information page at the point of sale regarding the
above requirements. This includes cases where
ingredients may alter slightly from those provided on In some circumstances it may
the product information page owing to ongoing not be possible to provide
recipe adjustments. In such cases a warning should accurate information on the
be given to consumers to check the label of products product information page at the
once they have been delivered to obtain accurate point of sale regarding the
food information. above requirements. This
includes cases where
ingredients may alter slightly
from those provided on the
product information page owing
to ongoing recipe adjustments.
In such cases a warning should
be given to consumers to check
the label of products once they
have been delivered to obtain
accurate food information.
[If the composition of the pre-packaged food offered Indonesia proposes that the
for sale through e-commerce is subject to minor term “minor variations” in the
variations by the substitution of an ingredient which bracketed texts should be
performs a similar function, the statement of further clarified.
ingredients on the digital product information sheet
may list both ingredients in a way which makes it
clear that alternative or substitute ingredients are
being declared.]
[A statement shall appear on the digital product

information page to the effect that the customer
should check the information on the physical label
before consumption.]
Any pre-packaged foods offered for sale to

consumers are encouraged to have a minimum
2021/20/OCS-FL)
durability period, an indication of which should be

displayed on the product information e-page. It
should be made clear whether this is a guaranteed
period or an expected or average period.
Food offered for sale through e-commerce should

declare the nutritional information prior to the point
of e-commerce sale in alignment with section 3 of
the Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling (CXG 2-1985),
except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in
the Guidelines of Nutrition Labelling.
5. Exemptions from food information
requirements at the point of sale for pre-
packaged foods sold through e-commerce
The following information is exempt from the
information requirements for pre-packaged foods
when products are presented for sale through e-
commerce:
5.1 Date marking
As indicated in section 4.7.1 of the GSLPF (CXS
1-1985). However, an indication of a minimum
durability applicable from the point of delivery is
encouraged to be displayed.
5.2 Lot identification
As indicated in section 4.6 of the GSLPF (CXS
1-1985).
Proposed alternative wording of section 4 & 5 Indonesia agrees with this
proposed alternative wording,
[4.1 Any information required to be provided on the
and proposes that the term
label of a pre-packaged food or in associated
“minor variations” in the point
labelling, shall be provided on the digital product
4.2 should be further clarified.
information page of the pre-packaged food when
offered for sale via e-commerce, except to the
extent otherwise expressly provided in an individual
Codex standard. This includes the following
information:
 Information indicated in section 4 and section 5 of

the GSLPF (CXS 1-1985) except information
required by 4.6 and 4.7.1
2021/20/OCS-FL)
 Mandatory information required by any other

relevant Codex text
4.2 If the composition of the pre-packaged food

offered for sale through e-commerce is subject to
minor variations by the substitution of an ingredient
which performs a similar function, the statement of
ingredients on the digital product information sheet
may list both ingredients in a way which makes it
clear that alternative or substitute ingredients are
being declared.
4.3 A statement shall appear on the digital product

information page to the effect that the customer
should check the information on the physical label
before consumption.]
6. Optional food information requirements at

the point of e-commerce sale
As indicated in section 7 of the GSLPF (CXS 1-
1985)
7. Presentation of mandatory information
7.1 General
7.1.1 Statements required to appear on the product
information e-page at the point of sale in respect of
pre-packaged foods to be offered via e-commerce,
by virtue of this text or any other Codex texts, shall
be clear, prominent and readily legible to the
consumer under normal settings and conditions of
use of such platforms.
7.1.2 The name and net contents of the food shall
appear in a prominent position and in the same field
of vision as the virtual depiction of the product.
7.2 Language
7.2.1 The language on product information e-page
shall be acceptable to the consumer for whom it is
intended
2) Indonesia consider that the issue of cross-border e-Commerce sales is outside the
scope of the draft guidance and should be referred to the Codex Committee on Food
Import and Export Inspection and Certification Systems (CCFICS).
4. AGENDA ITEM 8 ALLERGEN LABELLING: PROPOSED DRAFT REVISIONS TO THE

GSLPF AND GUIDANCE OF PRECAUTIONARY ALLERGEN LABELLING
1) COMMENTS TO PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF THE GENERAL STANDARD

FOR THE LABELLING OF PREPACKAGED FOODS (CXS 1-1985) RELEVANT TO
ALLERGEN LABELLING
PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF THE GSLPF INDONESIA COMMENTS

2. DEFINITION OF TERMS
For the purpose of this standard:

NEW
“Allergen” means an otherwise harmless Indonesia agrees with the definition of
substance capable of triggering a response that “allergen”
starts in theimmune system and results in an
allergic reaction in certain individuals. In the
case of foods, it is a protein which is found in
food capable of triggering a response in
individuals sensitised to it.
“Food allergy” means adverse immune

reactions to certain food proteins, which may
be immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated and
associated with anaphylaxis, non-IgE
mediated1, or a combination of both.
"Food intolerance" means adverse reactions to
food components that occur through non-
immunological mechanisms.
“Hypersensitivity” means the repeatable
adverse reaction to an allergen or other
substance in food associated with IgE
mediated food allergy, non-IgE mediated food
allergy1, or food intolerance (i.e. sulphites,
lactose).
Footnote
1 Includes coeliac disease which is a serious
lifelong illness where the body’s immune system
attacks its owntissues when gluten is consumed.
This causes damage to the lining of the gut and
results in the inability of thebody to properly absorb
nutrients from food.
4. MANDATORY LABELLING OF
PREPACKAGED FOODS
4.2 List of ingredients
4.2.1.3 Where an ingredient is itself the product of

two or more ingredients, such a compound Indonesia agrees with the proposed
ingredient maybe declared, as such, in the list text in section 4.2.1.3.
of ingredients, provided that it is immediately
accompanied by a list, in brackets, of its
ingredients in descending order of proportion
(m/m). Where a compound ingredient (for
which a name has been established in a
Codex standard or in national legislation)
constitutes less than 5% of the food, the
ingredients, other than [those listed in
section 4.2.1.4 and] food additives which
serve a technological function in the finished
product, need not be declared.
[4.2.1.4 The following foods and ingredients are
known to cause hypersensitivity and shall
always be declared:2
 Cereals containing gluten; i.e., wheat, rye,
barley, oats, spelt or their hybridized
strains and products of these;
 Crustacea and products of these;
 Eggs and egg products;
 Fish and fish products;
 Peanuts, soybeans and products of these;
 Milk and milk products (lactose included);
 Tree nuts and nut products; and
 Sulphite in concentrations of 10 mg/kg or

more.]
Footnote
2 Future additions to and/or deletions from this
list will be considered by the Codex
Committee on Food Labelling taking into
account the advice provided by the Joint
FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food
Additives(JECFA).
NEW
[4.2.1.5 Declaration of the foods and ingredients

listed in section 4.2.1.4 shall be made using
commonlyknown terms for the source of
the food and ingredient as part of, or in
conjunction with, the relevant ingredient
name.]
RENUMBER existing 4.2.1.5 and 4.2.1.6
4.2.3 A specific name shall be used for ingredients

in the list of ingredients in accordance with the
provisions set out in Section 4.1 (Name of the Food)
except that:
4.2.3.1 [Except for those ingredients listed in

section 4.2.1.4, and uUnless a general class name Indonesia agrees with the proposed
would be more informative, the following class text in section 4.2.3.1
names may be used. In all cases, the food and
ingredients listed in section 4.2.1.4 must be
declared in accordance with section 4.2.1.5.]
4.2.4 Processing Aids and Carry-Over of Food

Additives
4.2.4.2 A food additive carried over into foods at a Indonesia agrees with the proposed
level less than that required to achieve a text in section 4.2.4.2
technological function, and processing aids,
are exempted from declaration in the list of
ingredients. The exemption does not apply to
food additive and processing aids [that
contain or are derived from the foods and
ingredients] listed in section 4.2.1.4.
6. EXEMPTIONS FROM MANDATORY

LABELLING REQUIREMENTS
With the exception of spices and herbs, small units, Indonesia agrees with the proposed
where the largest surface area is less than 10 cm², text in section 6
may be exempted from the requirements of
paragraphs 4.2 and 4.6 to 4.8. [This exemption
does not apply to the declaration of foods and
ingredients listed in section 4.2.1.4.]
8. PRESENTATION OF MANDATORY
INFORMATION
(NEW)
8.3 Declared foods and ingredients known to
cause hypersensitivity
8.3.1 The foods and ingredients listed in section

Indonesia agrees with the proposed
4.2.1.4 shall be declared so as to contrast
distinctly from surrounding text, such as text in section 8.3.1
through the use of font type, style or colour.
8.3.1.1 The font type, style and a minimum font

size as well as the use of upper and lower case Indonesia agrees with the proposed
letters should be considered by competent text in section 8.3.1.1
authorities to ensure legibility of declarations
about foods and ingredients known to cause
hypersensitivity.
8.3.2 In addition to the list of ingredients, the Indonesia agrees with the proposed
foods and ingredients listed in section 4.2.1.4 text in section 8.3.2
may be declared in a separate statement, which
shall be placed near and within the same field of
view as the list of ingredients.
8.3.2.1 This statement shall commence with the

word ‘Contains’ (or equivalent word) and declare Indonesia agrees with the proposed
all foods and ingredients known to cause text in section 8.3.2.1
hypersensitivity in the food using commonly
known terms for the source of the food and
ingredient.
Indonesia considers that the text in

8.3.3 Where a food is exempt from declaring a section 8.3.3 should be referred to
list of ingredients, the foods and ingredients
section 6 to make it clearer:
listed in section 4.2.1.4 shall be declared, such
as in a statement made in accordance with 8.3.3.Where a food is exempt from
section 8.3.2.1. declaring a list of ingredients, set out in
section 6, the foods and ingredients
listed in section 4.2.1.4 shall be
declared, such as in a statement made
in accordance with section 8.3.2.1.
8.3.4 For single ingredient foods, section 8.3.3 Indonesia considers that the text in
does not apply where foods and ingredients section 8.3.4 should be further clarified
known to cause hypersensitivity are declared as on how information of allergen in
part of, or in conjunction with, the name of the product with single ingredient can be
food in accordance with section 4.2.1.5. delivered to the cosumers
2) COMMENTS TO PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF

[PRECAUTIONARY ALLERGEN OR ADVISORY LABELLING]
PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES INDONESIA COMMENTS
1. PURPOSE
To facilitate consistent and harmonised approaches

to the effective use of [precautionary allergen or
advisory labelling] (PAL) for communicating to
consumers with food allergy about the risk from the
unintentional presence of allergens in food due to
cross-contact
2. SCOPE
2.1 These guidelines apply to PAL when used to
indicate the possible unintentional presence of
allergens caused by cross-contact in prepackaged
foods that are within the scope of the General
Standard for the Labelling of Prepackaged Foods
(CXS 1-1985).
2.2 The Code of Practice on Allergen
Management for Food Business Operators (CXC 80-
2020) provides guidance on effective management
PROPOSED DRAFT GUIDELINES INDONESIA COMMENTS
practices and controls to prevent or minimise the
potential for allergen cross-contact.
3. DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of these guidelines:
Allergen means an otherwise harmless substance
capable of triggering a response that starts in
the immune system and results in an allergic
reaction in certain individuals. In the case of
foods, it is a protein which is found in food
capable of triggering a response in individuals
sensitised to it.
Allergen cross-contact occurs when an allergenic
food, or ingredient, is unintentionally
incorporated into another food that is not
intended to contain that allergenic food.
[Precautionary allergen or advisory labelling] is
a statement indicating the allergen(s) that may
be present in a food due to allergen cross-
contact during the production, manufacture and
transport of food, which may occur despite
implementing allergen management practices
and controls such as in the Code of Practice on
Food Allergen Management for Food Business
Operators (CXC 80-2020).
4. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
4.1 The decision to use PAL should be based on
the findings of a risk assessment which can include,
but not limited to, quantitative risk assessment. The
use of PAL should be restricted to those situations in
which allergen cross-contact cannot be controlled to
the extent that the product may present a risk to
allergic consumers.
4.2 PAL should only be used if exposure to the

allergen from the food is above an established
reference dose. If a reference dose is not established
for a particular allergen, an estimated reference dose
can be used.If a quantitative risk assessment cannot
be performed, then PAL should only be applied if any
risk of allergen-cross contact identified through a risk
assessment cannot be removed through risk
management actions, such as segregation and
cleaning.
5. PRESENTATION OF PAL
Yet to be drafted but to include guidance on location
on label, format and language
3) Indonesia considers this work program (i.e. revision of provisions relevant to allergen
labelling in the GSLPF (Part 1) and the development of guidance on the use of PAL
(Part 2) should continue to be progressed together.

Laporan CCFL

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Laporan CCFL

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

BADAN PENGAWAS OBAT DAN MAKANAN

DIREKTORAT STANDARDISASI PANGAN OLAHAN

Sehubungan dengan telah dilaksanakan Sidang Committee on Food Labelling ke-46,

3. Delegasi Indonesia adalah Direktur Standardisasi Pangan Olahan – selaku Ketua

Demikian disampaikan, mohon arahan Ibu selanjutnya. Terima kasih.

Yunida Nugrahanti Soedarto

DIREKTORAT STANDARDISASI PANGAN OLAHAN

B. DISKUSI DAN HASIL SIDANG CCFL KE-46

3. Agenda item 3 Matters of interest from FAO and WHO

5. Agenda item 5 Draft Guidance for the Labelling of Non-Retail Containers

6. Agenda Item 6 Proposed Draft Guidelines on Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling

7. Agenda Item 7 Proposed Draft Guidelines on Internet Sales/E-Commerce

8. Agenda Item 8 Food Allergen Labelling

b. Proposed Draft Guidance on Precautionary Allergen Labelling (Agenda

9. Agenda Item 9 Innovation-Use of Technology in Food Labelling (Discussion

10. Agenda Item 10 Labelling of Alcoholic Beverages (Discussion Paper)

11. Agenda Item 11 Labelling of Foods in Joint Presentation and Multipack

14. Agenda Item 14 Other Business

15. Agenda Item 15 Date and Place of the Next Session

POSISI INDONESIA PADA SIDANG CCFL

1. AGENDA ITEM 5 DRAFT GUIDANCE FOR THE LABELLING OF NON-RETAIL

Comments to CL 2021/45/OCS-FL - Request for comments on the draft guidance

Annex I of CX/FL 21/46/5 Add.1

DRAFT GUIDANCE FOR THE LABELLING OF

The purpose of [these Guidelines] / [this Standard]

“Food Business” means an entity or

“Non-retail container” means any container 1

4.2 The labelling requirements for non-retail

4.3 The nNon-retail containers should be

4.4 The non-retail status of a container shall

4.5 The labelling requirements for non-retail

4.6 Subject to the requirements outlined in

4.7 The label and information in the

5.1 The name of the food

5.1.1.1 Where a name or names

5.1.1.2 In other cases, the name

5.1.1.3 In the absence of any such

5.1.1.4 A “coined”, “fanciful”, “brand”

5.1.1.5 Where the non-retail container

food, the names of all the

5.2 Lot identification

Storage instructions shall be provided on

If no special storage instructions were

5.4 Identification of a non-retail Indonesia proposes to revise the second bullet

container. Some examples of such

5.5 Name and address

5.6 Where a non retail container contains

Indonesia proposes to accommodate a new

5.6 Net contents of the non-retail

This information can be directly seen by food

6.1 The information that shall be provided in Indonesia proposes to:

i. Information provided on the label as

ii. If not all on the label: Information sufficient

iii. Net contents of the non-retail container List

6.2 The information provided in the accompanying

6.3 If all mandatory information is made

7. [BULK TRANSPORT PROVISIONS FOR

7.1 Non-retail container used as food

In the case of a non-retail container used as a

shall be effectively traceable to the food in such

7.2 Non-retail container containing multiple

5.6 Where a non-retail container contains multiple

7.3 8 [EXEMPTION Non-retail container