Jumlah penduduk dalam suatu negara merupakan salah satu potensi dasar yang dapat
dimanfaatkan dalam pembagunan. Potensi tersebut akan menjadi kekuatan dalam
pelaksanaan pembangunan apalagi kualitas penduduknya baik, hal ini antara lain tercermin
pada tingginya tingkat kesehatan jasmani dan rohani, tingkat pendidikan dan keterampilan,
serta daya nalar penduduk negara tersebut. Di samping itu, kekuatan pembangunan
tersebut akan menjadi optimal apabila penduduk dapat berpartisipasi secara penuh dalam
pelaksanaan pembangunan sesuai dengan kapasitas dan kemampuan individu dan
kemampuan kelompok.
Perkembangan jumlah penduduk Indonesia menurut jenis kelamin pada tahun 2000, 2005,
dan 2010 menunjukkan bahwa lebih dari setengah jumlah penduduk Indonesia merupakan
wanita. Dengan jumlah penduduk yang besar tersebut partisipasi dan peranannya dapat
didayagunakan serta dioptimalkan dalam derap pembangunan, bukan mustahil hasil
pembangunan yang telah dicapai pada saat ini masih dapat ditingkatkan lagi.
Wilayah cekungan Bandung memiliki resiko gempa bumi karena jumlah penduduknya yang
padat dan banyak berdiri objek vital. Cekungan ini secara geologis terdiri dari hasil endapan
alluvium danau purba yang kondisinya gembur dan dapat mengamplifikasi goncangan
gempa bumi. Pada skala regional, Badan Geologi juga telah melakukan pemetaaan
seismoteknik di wilayah Bandung dan sekitarnya. Dari pemetaan ini diketahui bahwa wilayah
Bandung terdiri dari batuan sedimen tersier yang bersifat padu dan keras pada bagian
bawah dan ditutup oleh bagian sedimen gunung api.
PVMBG sudah melakukan penelitian dan kajian yang menghasilkan peta untuk kepentingan
mitigasi bencana. Salah satu rekomendasinya ialah tidak mendirikan bangunan di daerah
resiko bencana, seperti di atas sumber gempa dan longsor. Pembangunan di cekungan
Bandung direkomendasikan agar mengikuti kaidah struktur bangunan tahan gempa bumi
sesuai Standar Nasional Indonesia yang dan sudah menjadi acuan Kementerian PU.
Today's pet dog descended from wolves wild animals that shared the same habitat as
human hunter-gatherers and, eventually, became domesticated companions at about 7,000
BC. There are a few theories that explain the change from savage creature to complimentary
intimate. One hypothesis suggests that when humans took in abandoned wolf cubs,
inbreeding and a new generation of domesticated animals followed. Another theory posits
that scavenging wolves would find carrion that had been discarded by humans, which lead
them to approach the unfamiliar beings. As they got nearer, they fought their instinct to flee,
and that trait was passed along to their descendants, making them more suited for
domestication.
Along with the domestication of wolves came physical changes to the tame canine such as a
smaller build, a more compact jaw along with diminutive teeth as compared to their feral
counterparts, alterations in fur coloring and markings; a smaller brain and subsequently a
decrease in cranial capacity which did not allow room for certain instincts that are essential
in the wild.
Recent investigations into how children acquire knowledge about the outside world have
produced agreement on one point. Children are not the blank slates imagined by
philosophers since Descartes According to leading cognitive scientists, it appears that
children possess some form of innate understanding about the physical world and its
concepts, such as force, heat, matter, and weight. But while scientists agree that there is
some sort of initial framework present in the minds of children through which observations
about the outside world are filtered and then interpreted, there is considerable disagreement
over how to characterize and describe these structures.
Other researchers believe that a child's mind comes equipped with a number of basic
theories about common physical domains. These theories restrict both the type and number
of viable 'inferences a child makes about the world, although these initial theories may then
be amended by culturally acquired knowledge. Experiments have shown that when asked
about the shape of the earth, very young children visualize it as a flat surface, usually, a
square or disc, resting on some form of support, with the inhabitants living on “top” of the
surface. such a perspective would be consistent with a child's basic experiences of the
world. However, older children accurately describe the earth as a sphere floating in space, a
picture that contradicts our intuitions about objects but is in accordance with the culturally
and scientifically accepted views of the earth. Tellingly, none of the children in the
experiment pictured the earth as a pyramid, a point, a line, or any of a number of other
possible geometric forms.