Correlations

X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 Total_X

Pearson Correlation 1 .553** .147 .187 .495** .204 .421** .320** .021 .652** .646**

X1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .221 .118 .000 .088 .000 .006 .861 .000 .000

N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71

Pearson Correlation .553 **

1 .304 **
.600 **
.405 **
.223 .440 **
.267 *
.011 .507 **
.711**
X2 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .010 .000 .000 .061 .000 .024 .931 .000 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .147 .304**
1 .455 **
.426 **
.286 *
.117 .332 **
.256 *
.330 **
.572**
X3 Sig. (2-tailed) .221 .010 .000 .000 .016 .330 .005 .031 .005 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .187 .600**
.455 **
1 .610 **
.115 .200 .125 .404 **
.125 .641**
X4 Sig. (2-tailed) .118 .000 .000 .000 .340 .094 .297 .000 .297 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .495 **
.405**
.426 **
.610 **
1 .317 **
.424 **
.253 *
.514 **
.441 **
.798**
X5 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .007 .000 .034 .000 .000 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .204 .223 .286* .115 .317** 1 .494** .358** .177 .341** .515**
X6 Sig. (2-tailed) .088 .061 .016 .340 .007 .000 .002 .139 .004 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .421 **
.440**
.117 .200 .424 **
.494 **
1 .560 **
.075 .455 **
.642**
X7 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .330 .094 .000 .000 .000 .537 .000 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .320 **
.267 *
.332 **
.125 .253 *
.358 **
.560 **
1 .073 .489 **
.581**
X8 Sig. (2-tailed) .006 .024 .005 .297 .034 .002 .000 .543 .000 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .021 .011 .256 *
.404 **
.514 **
.177 .075 .073 1 -.074 .409**
X9 Sig. (2-tailed) .861 .931 .031 .000 .000 .139 .537 .543 .542 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .652 **
.507**
.330 **
.125 .441 **
.341 **
.455 **
.489 **
-.074 1 .700**
X10 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .005 .297 .000 .004 .000 .000 .542 .000
N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71
Pearson Correlation .646** .711** .572** .641** .798** .515** .642** .581** .409** .700** 1

Total_X Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Ghozali (2016) mengemukakan bahwa uji validitas digunakan untuk mengukur valid atau tidaknya suatu data kuesioner. Uji validitas
dihitung dengan membandingkan rhitung dengan nilai rtabel. Jika rhitung > rtabel dengan taraf signifikansi 0,05 maka pernyataan yang ada
dalam kuesioner dinyatakan valid. Hasil perhitungan uji validitas berdasarkan tabel diatas, menunjukkan bahwa nilai koefisien relasi
lebih besar dibandingkan rtabel sebesar 0,196. Maka dari itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa seluruh item dari angket penelitian ini valid dan
dapat digunakan sebagai instrument penelitian yang layak