1

Informatika
Persiapan Akreditasi Internasional
(ABET) untuk Teknik Informatika
Dr. Nur Ulfa Maulidevi & Dr. Masayu Leylia Khodra
KK- Informatika
STEI-ITB
2
KK - Informatika
Outline
Akreditasi untuk Perguruan Tinggi
Mengapa Akreditasi ABET ?
Proses Akreditasi ABET
Persiapan Akreditasi di IF-ITB
3
KK - Informatika
Akreditasi untuk Perguruan Tinggi
Penilaian mutu dan efisiensi penyelenggaraan
program studi dan perguruan tinggi
(BAN-PT http://ban-pt.kemdiknas.go.id/ )
Bukti suatu program studi memenuhi standar yang
diperlukan untuk menghasilkan lulusan yang siap
memasuki profesinya
(ABET http://abet.org/ )
Lulusan: standar global kemampuan teknikal dan profesional
Jaminan kualitas dan peningkatannya akan berkelanjutan
Workshop Kurikulum Teknik Informatika - ITB
4
KK - Informatika
ABET
Organisasi nirlaba dan non-pemerintah
yang mengakreditasi bidang sains
terapan, computing, teknik, and
teknologi
Program pendidikan terakreditasi ABET:
3100 program di 670 universitas dari 24
negara
Workshop Kurikulum Teknik Informatika - ITB
5
KK - Informatika
Mengapa Akreditasi ABET ?
Pengakuan internasional atas kualitas program
studi kerekayasaan / computing
Kompetensi lulusan diakui memenuhi standar
internasional
Wujud Visi ITB dalam Renstra ITB 2010-2015
ITB berupaya untuk memperoleh pengakuan
internasional terhadap mutu kurikulum, metode
pembelajaran, tenaga pengajar, serta prasarana
pendukung pembelajaran
Workshop Kurikulum Teknik Informatika - ITB
6
KK - Informatika
Program Studi ITB Terakreditasi ABET
T. Elektro, T. Kelautan, T. Kimia, T. Fisika
Teknik Informatika ?
Tahap persiapan akreditasi ABET
Workshop Kurikulum Teknik Informatika - ITB
7
KK - Informatika
Proses Akreditasi ABET
Sebelum Akreditasi:
Assessment
Planning
Akreditasi
(18 bulan):
- Permintaan Evaluasi
- Self Study Report
- Kunjungan Assesor ABET
Setelah Akreditasi:
Pelaporan
Perubahan
Workshop Kurikulum Teknik Informatika - ITB
8
KK - Informatika
Assessment Planning
2008: Tim Akreditasi Internasional IF-ITB
Evaluasi proses pendidikan yang sedang berjalan:
Hasil evaluasi: sulit mengisi self study report / adanya
kesenjangan antara proses pendidikan yang terjadi dengan
kriteria ABET
Merekomendasikan perbaikan agar sesuai standar
internasional
2012: Persiapan Self Study Report (SSR) Final
Target pendaftaran akreditasi: 2013
Bidang akreditasi: Computer Science (Computing)
9
KK - Informatika
Self Study Report
8 aspek evaluasi:
1. Students
2. Program educational objectives (PEO)
Kompetensi Lulusan
3. Objectives, Student Outcomes (SO), & Assessments
4. Continuous Improvement
5. Curriculum
6. Faculty
7. Facilities
8. Institutional Support
10
KK - Informatika
Program Educational Objective (PEO)
1. Our graduates will have successful careers and
become productive professionals in their fields.
2. Our graduates will be able to gain admission to
and complete their graduate studies.
3. Our graduates will be able to develop
professionally through life-long learning and
have an active role in the development of new
tools, technologies and methodologies.
11
KK - Informatika
A An ability to apply knowledge of computing and mathematics appropriate to the discipline
B An ability to analyze a problem, and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate to its
solution
C An ability to design, implement and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to
meet desired needs
D An ability to function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal
E An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security, and social issues and responsibilities
F An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences
G An ability to analyze the local and global impact of computing on individuals, organizations and society
H Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, continuing professional development
I An ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practices
J An ability to apply mathematical foundations, algorithmic principles, and computer science theory in the
modeling and design of computer-based systems in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoffs
involved in design choices
K An ability to apply design and development principles in the construction of software systems of varying
complexity
Students Outcomes
12
KK - Informatika
Monitoring dan Evaluasi PEO
PEO harus
selalu di
monitor, di
evaluasi, dan
diperbaiki jika
diperlukan
Institutional
Program
Mission
Evaluation of Program
Educational Objectives by
Undergraduate Program
Curriculum Committeee
Constituent
Meeting
Alumni
Survey
Tracer
Study
Review of Program Educational
Objectives on Advisory Board Meeting
Approval of Program
Educational Objectives by
SEEI Senate
Approval by Dean of
SEEI
13
KK - Informatika
Student Outcome (SO)
Kompetensi
spesifik yang
akan dimiliki
lulusan
Diturunkan
dari PEO
(Program
Educational
Objective)
Program Educational Objective
1 2 3
S
t
u
d
e
n
t

O
u
t
c
o
m
e
s
a X X X
b X X X
c X X
d X
e X
f X X
g X X
h X X
i X X
j X X
k X X
14
KK - Informatika
Monitoring dan Evaluasi SO
Seperti PEO,
SO juga
harus selalu
di monitor, di
evaluasi, dan
diperbaiki jika
diperlukan
Program
Educational
Objective
Establishment and
Revision of Student
Outcomes by
Undergraduate
Program
Curriculum
Committeee
ABET
Criteria
Tracer Study,
Constituent Meeting &
Alumni Survey
Approval of Student
Outcomes by SEEI Senate
Approval by Dean of
SEEI
15
KK - Informatika
Penyusunan Kurikulum
SO : petunjuk dalam penyusunan kurikulum
Setiap SO akan dicapai dari matakuliah apa saja
Berdasarkan SO yang sudah dibentuk oleh Prodi,
dibentuk kurikulum Prodi IF yang terdiri atas 4
kategori yaitu:
Basic science and mathematics
Computing topics
Non-computing electives
General education
16
KK - Informatika
Kaitan antara SO dan Kategori kuliah
pada Kurikulum
Workshop Kurikulum Teknik Informatika - ITB
Course Categories
Students Learning Outcomes
a b c d e f g h i j k
Basic Science and Math x x x x
Computing Topics x x x x x x x x x x x
Non-Computing Elective x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
x
*
General Education x x x x x x
17
KK - Informatika
Perbaikan Kurikulum
Kurikulum
diubah 5 tahun
sekali
Student
Outcomes
Curriculum
and Course
Revision
Assemble
Performance
Criteria &
Metric
ACM & IEEE-Computer
Society Curriculum
Guide
Teaching &
Learning
Process
Assessment
&
Evaluation
18
KK - Informatika
Bagaimana mengukur ketercapaian
SO?
Alat pengukuran:
Rubric kuliah: merepresentasikan langsung capaian siswa
dalam suatu outcome untuk suatu kuliah
Kuesioner kuliah: pengukuran tidak langsung, berdasarkan
persepsi siswa yang menilai aspek pengajar kuliah, dan
pemahaman mereka terhadap topik kuliah (bagian kedua
yang digunakan untuk pengukuran SO)
Exit Survey: diberikan kepada wisudawan, untuk menilai
sendiri capaian mereka terhadap SO
Masing-masing diberikan nilai 1 (E) 5 (A)
5 adalah nilai terbaik
19
KK - Informatika
Rencana pengukuran SO
Pengukuran SO minimal dilakukan dalam 3 semester perkuliahan,
misal Prodi IF melakukan di:
Semester II 2011/2012
Semester I 2012/2013
Semester II 2012/2013
Tidak harus dilakukan pada semua kuliah, namun lebih baik jika
dapat dilakukan untuk semua kuliah yang ditawarkan
Harus ada minimal 2 semester yang memberikan kuliah yang
sama, agar dapat diukur perbandingan capaian antar 2 semester
tersebut mengetahui apakah terjadi continuous improvement
Inti dari akreditasi ABET adalah terlaksananya continuous
improvement
20
KK - Informatika
Pengukuran SO di Semester II
2011/2012
Code Name A B C D E F G H I J K
IF2032 Object Oriented
Programming
x x
IF2036 Software
Engineering
x x
IF2050 Logic of Informatics x x x
IF3038 Internet
Programming
x x
IF3054 Artificial
Intelligence
x x
IF3099 Human Computer
Interaction
x x
IF3094 Inter Personal
Communication
x
21
KK - Informatika
Pengukuran SO di Semester I 2012/2013
Code Name A B C D E F G H I J K
IF2091 Discrete Structure x
IF2092 Probability & Statistics x
KU1071 Introduction to
Information Technology
A
x
IF2030 Algorithm and Data
Structure
x
IF3051 Strategy of Algorithm x x
IF3057 Information System x x x x
IF4031 Management of
Software Project
x
IF4092 Socio-Technology of
Information
x x x x
IF4091 Industrial Practice
(Internship)
x x x x x x x x
IF4096 Final Project I &
Seminar
x
IF3037 Advanced Software
Engineering
x X
22
KK - Informatika
Pengukuran SO di Semester II 2012/2013
Code Name A B C D E F G H I J K
IF2091 Discrete Structure x
IF2092 Probability & Statistics x
KU1071 Introduction to
Information Technology
A
x
IF2030 Algorithm and Data
Structure
x
IF3051 Strategy of Algorithm x x
IF3057 Information System x x x x
IF4031 Management of
Software Project
x
IF4092 Socio-Technology of
Information
x x x x
IF4091 Industrial Practice
(Internship)
x x x x x x x x
IF4096 Final Project I &
Seminar
x
IF3037 Advanced Software
Engineering
x X
23
KK - Informatika
Contoh Rubric kuliah Logika Informatika
Mengukur 3 SO yaitu a, c, dan i
Student outcome
How they are covered by specific course
outcomes
Evaluation
a
An ability to apply knowledge of computing
and mathematics appropriate to the discipline
1
Students are able to translate a natural
language problem into propositional logic
representation
Quiz 1 No. 1
2
Students are able to translate a natural
language problem into relational logic
representation
Midterm Test No. 7a
c
An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a
computer-based system, process, component,
or program to meet desired needs
1
Students are able to design and implement
a simple program in Prolog to solve simple
problem, based on automatic theorem
proving
Final Test No. 1c
2
Students are able to evaluate an existing
Prolog program, based on the problem to
be solved
Final Test No. 4
i
An ability to use current techniques, skills, and
tools necessary for computing practice
1
Students are able to prove or draw a
conclusion from existing facts/ premises
using propositional/ relational proof
Midterm Test No. 7b
2
Students are able to prove or draw a
conclusion from existing facts/ premises
using propositional/ relational resolution
Quiz 2 No. 2
24
KK - Informatika
Contoh Rubric kuliah Logika Informatika (2)
Problem A B C D E
a.1
Translate the
sentences from natural
language into
propositional logic
representation
Quiz 1 No. 1
All sentences are
translated correctly
able to translate some
compound sentences
and able to translate all
simple sentences
Able to translate all
sentences into simple
propositional sentences
Able to translate some
of simple sentences
and not able to translate
into compound
senteces
Can not translate all the
sentences into
propositional language
42 2 33 7 0 0
a.2
Translate the
sentences from natural
language into relational
logic representation
(FOL)
Midterm
Test No. 7a
All sentences are
translated correctly
able to translate some
compound sentences
and able to translate all
simple sentences with
correct quantifier
Able to translate all
sentences into simple
propositional sentences
but incorrect quantifier
Able to translate some
of simple sentences
and not able to translate
into compound
senteces
Can not translate all the
sentences into
propositional language
43 12 14 4 8 5
c.1
Built a prolog program to
manipulate list
Final Test
No. 1c
Program are correctly
created
The logic are correct,
but the syntax is
incorret
Case analysis is not
complete
Program are wrong
logically
Does not know how to
build the program
43 24 4 3 4 8
25
KK - Informatika
Contoh Rubric kuliah Logika Informatika (3)
Problem
All sentences
are translated
correctly
able to
translate some
compound
sentences and
able to
translate all
simple
sentences
Able to
translate all
sentences into
simple
propositional
sentences
Able to
translate some
of simple
sentences and
not able to
translate into
compound
senteces
Can not
translate all the
sentences into
propositional
language
Evaluation
a.1
Translate the
sentences
from natural
language into
propositional
logic
representation
Quiz 1
No. 1
5% 79% 17% 0% 0%
Achievements: This achievement is sufficient, since
most of the students are able to translate the natural
language correctly into simple sentence, but need to be
improved in translating into compound sentence.
Need modest improvement: More example and practice
in translating natural language sentences into
propositional logic compound sentences.
Program are
correctly
created
The logic are
correct, but the
syntax is
incorret
Case analysis
is not complete
Program are
wrong logically
Does not know
how to build
the program
Evaluation
c.1
Built a prolog
program to
manipulate list
Final Test
No. 1c
56% 9% 7% 9% 19%
Achievements: Most of the students are able to build a
simple prolog program to manipulate list.
Need modest improvement: Additional tutorial for
students who have problems in build simple prolog
program is necessary. This tutorial can not be given in
class since most of the students are not having this
problem.
26
KK - Informatika
Contoh hasil evaluasi di 2 semester
Hasil evaluasi kuliah Logika Informatika di Sem II
2011/2012 untuk SO (a):
Most of the students are able to apply their knowledge in
computing and mathematics to solve problem using logical
representation approach. More exercise is encouraged to
be carried out in order to develop their competencies.
Hasil evaluasi kuliah Logika Informatika di Sem II
2012/2013 untuk SO (a):
By giving more practices to students, the achievement
of this outcome is improved from last year achievement.
Modest improvement is required by giving special tutorial for
students who need it.
27
KK - Informatika
Contoh grafik hasil Pengukuran
Contoh untuk SO (a) yaitu An ability to apply knowledge of
computing and mathematics appropriate to the discipline yang
diukur dengan Exit Survey, Kuesioner Siswa, dan Rubric
Dari grafik terlihat, hasil pengukuran pada kuliah melalui rubric,
dan persepsi mahasiswa mengenai kemampuan dirinya,
konsisten di daerah substantially developed
28
KK - Informatika
Lanjutan Proses Akreditasi ABET
Setelah Prodi melakukan assessment planning, Prodi mendaftarkan
RFE (Request for Evaluation) ke ABET
ABET melakukan proses akreditasi selama 18 bulan:
Review kesiapan Prodi & Melengkapi request for Approval
Melengkapi Self Study Report
On-site Visit oleh pihak ABET ke Prodi
Perbaikan hasil on-site visit selama 30 hari
Hasil keputusan & pengumuman
Proses selanjutnya (optional) : perbaikan program, pemberitahuan ke
ABET jika Prodi melakukan perubahan yang berpengaruh pada ABET
compliances, dll
Reevaluasi Prodi oleh ABET setidaknya 6 tahun sekali, namun jika
diperlukan bisa dilakukan reevaluasi sebelum 6 tahun berikutnya.
29
KK - Informatika
Penutup
Akreditasi mengharuskan Prodi untuk selalu
menjaga kualitas kurikulum, dan melakukan
perbaikan terus menerus
Semua proses dan data harus tercatat, terukur,
dan jelas tahapan monitoring dan evaluasi nya
Kurikulum harus selalu mengacu pada azas
kebermanfaatan untuk masyarakat
30
KK - Informatika
TERIMA KASIH