Company Profile PT SSP 2020

PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA
NOMOR INDUK BERUSAHA (NIB)

9120007950611
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia c.q. Lembaga Pengelola dan Penyelenggara OSS berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 24
ayat (1) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelayanan Perizinan Berusaha Terintegrasi Secara
Elektronik, menerbitkan NIB kepada:
Nama Usaha : PT SUMBER SWARNA PRATAMA

Alamat Usaha : RUKO NIAGA ROXY MAS BLOK B 1 NO.16, JL.KH.HASYIM
ASHARI 125, Kel. , Kec. , Kota Adm. Jakarta Pusat, Prop. DKI
Jakarta
NPWP : 31.185.299.0-028.000
Nomor Telepon : -
Nomor Fax : -
Email : -
Nama KBLI : Pertambangan Bijih Nikel
Kode KBLI : 07295
Status Penanaman Modal : PMDN
NIB merupakan identitas Pelaku Usaha dalam rangka pelaksanaan kegiatan berusaha dan berlaku selama menjalankan
kegiatan usaha sesuai ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan.
NIB adalah bukti Pendaftaran Penanaman Modal/Berusaha yang sekaligus merupakan pengesahan Tanda Daftar Perusahaan
dan hak akses kepabeanan.
OSS berwenang untuk melakukan evaluasi dan/atau perubahan atas izin usaha (izin komersial/operasional) sesuai ketentuan
perundang-undangan.
NIB atas Perseroan Terbatas dibekukan apabila dalam kurun waktu paling lama 1 (satu) tahun tidak menyesuaikan maksud
dan tujuan serta kegiatan usahanya sesuai KBLI 2017 melalui SABH Direktorat Jenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum.
Penyesuaian tersebut dilakukan melalui perubahan anggaran dasar perseroan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam ketentuan Pasal
21 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, yang harus mendapat persetujuan Menteri
(Menteri Hukum dan HAM).
Seluruh data yang tercantum dalam NIB dapat berubah sesuai dengan perkembangan kegiatan berusaha
Ditetapkan tanggal : 01 September 2019
Dokumen ini dikeluarkan dari Sistem OSS atas dasar data dari pelaku usaha. Kebenaran dan keabsahan atas data yang ditampilkan dalam
dokumen ini dan data yang tersimpan dalam Sistem OSS menjadi tanggung jawab pelaku usaha sepenuhnya.
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Scanned by CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
RENCANA KERJA DAN ANGGARAN BIAYA (RKAB) TAHUN 2020
KATA PENGANTAR
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama adalah merupakan salah satu
Perusahaan Terbatas (PT) dan merupakan salah satu perusahaan yang
bergerak dalam Bidang Pertambangan yang memiliki konsesi
pertambangan Logam (Nikel dmp.), dimana Izin Usaha Pertambangan
(IUP) Operasi Produksi, sesuai Surat Keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor :
540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 Tanggal 25 November 2013 tentang
Persetujuan Peningkatan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Eksplorasi Menjadi
Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama dengan Luas 2.641 Ha, di Desa Ganda – Ganda dan Tamainusi
Kecamatan Petasia dan Soyo Jaya Kabupaten Morowali Utara Provinsi
Sulawesi Tengah. Selanjutnya perubahan kesatu atas keputusan Bupati
Morowali Nomor : 540.3/ SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan
Penyesuaian Kuasa Pertambangan Eksploitasi menjadi Izin Usaha
Pertambangan Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama,
sesuai Keputusan Gubernur Sulawesi Tengah Nomor : 540/456/IUP-
PR/DPMPTSP/2019 Tanggal 19 September 2019 tentang Perubahan
Komposisi Perubahan saham dan susunan direksi PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama
Selaku pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) Operasi Produksi,
PT Sumber Swarna Pratama tentunya selalu berpedoman terhadap
peraturan dan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, salah satunya adalah
penyusunan Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Biaya untuk Tahun 2020 ini,
i
yang merupakan pedoman khusus untuk pelaksanaan kegiatan kerja
(working activity) dan anggaran biaya (budget) Operasi Produksi secara
teknis dalam jangka waktu satu tahun kedepan.
Adapun rangkaian kegiatan penambangan yang dimaksud
meliputi : Pembersihan lahan (Clearing), Pengupasan Tanah
Penutup (Over Burden), Penambangan, Pengangkutan dan
Pemuatan serta Pengapalan/penjualan.
Akhirnya, kami mengucapkan terima kasih kepada semua
pihak yang telah membantu baik secara langsung maupun tidak
langsung dalam penyusunan dan perbaikan dokumen Rencana
Kerja dan Anggaran Biaya (RKAB) Tahun 2020 ini.
Kolonodale, Desember 2019

PT. SUMBER SWARNA PRATAMA
SIRAJUDDIN SURA
Direktur Utama
ii
DAFTAR ISI
KATA PENGANTAR ....................................................................................... i

DAFTAR ISI .............................................................................................. iii
DAFTAR TABEL ............................................................................................. v
DAFTAR GAMBAR ......................................................................................... ix
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN ...................................................................................... x
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………….. xi
BAB I PENDAHULUAN .......................................................................
1.1 Latar Belakang ................................................................................ 1

1.2 Legalitas .............................................................................. 9
BAB II PERSETUJUAN DAN REALISASI RKAB TAHUN 2019 SERTA

RKAB TAHUN 2020………………………………………………………
2.1 Kegiatan Eksplorasi………….………………………………………… 13

2.2 Konstruksi / Infrastruktur………….……………………………………. 23
2.3 Kegiatan Penambangan………………………….…………………… 25
2.4 Pengolahan dan Pemurnian atau Pencucian….…………………… 45
2.5 Pemasaran dan Persediaan (Inventory)……………………………. 45
2.6 Perlindungan Lingkungan…………………………………………….. 48
2.7 Keselamatan Pertambangan…………………………………………. 55
2.8 Standarisasi dan Usaha Jasa Pertambangan……………………… 65
2.9 Tenaga Kerja dan Pegngembangan Sumber Daya Manusia…….. 67
2.10 Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PPM)…………. 69
2.11 Pemanfaatan Produk Dalam Negeri dan Belanja Barang………… 71
2.12 Keuangan & Penerimaan Negara……………………………………. 73
BAB III RENCANA STRATEGIS LIMA TAHUN
ii
3.1 Kegiatan Eksplorasi......................................................................... 83

3.2 Produksi .......................................................................................... 83
3.3 Pemasaran ...................................................................................... 84

3.4 Organisasi & Tenaga Kerja ............................................................. 84
3.5 Investasi .......................................................................................... 86
3.6 Keuangan dan Penerimaan Negara ................................................ 86
iii
DAFTAR TABEL
Tabel Halaman
1.1 Koordinat IUP Operasi Produksi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama…… 5

1.2 Data Administrasi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama……………………. 10
1.3 Rencana Biaya Pemasangan Tanda Batas IUP Tahun
2020………………………………………………………………………. 11
1.4 Rencana Pemeliharaan Tanda Batas Tahun 2020 ......................... 12
2.1 Rekapitulasi Kegiatan Eksplorasi Sampai Tahun 2019.................. 14
2.2 Rencana & Realisasi Kegiatan Eksplorasi Tahun 2019 dan
Rencana Tahun 2020…………………………………………………… 16
2.3 Biaya Eksplorasi .............................................................................. 18
2.4 Neraca Sumber dayaTahun 2019 dan Tahun 2020......................... 20
2.5 Neraca Cadangan ........................................................................... 24
2.6 Rekonsiliasi Grade Control .............................................................. 22
2.7 Pernyataan Competent Person ....................................................... 22
2.8 Rencana dan Realisasi Konstruksi & Infrastruktur Tambang
Tahun 2019 ............................................................................... 22
2.9 Rencana Konstruksi & Infrastruktur Tambang Tahun 2020 ............ 22
2.10 Rencana dan Realisasi Pengupasan Over burden / Batuan
Penutup Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020............................. 30
2.11 Rencana & Realisasi Penimbunan OB Tahun 2019 & Rencana
Tahun 2020 ..................................................................................... 33
2.12 Rencana & Realisasi Inpit dan Outpit Dump Tahun 2019 dan
Dan Rencana Tahun 2020 .............................................................. 33
2.13 Rencana & Realisasi Kemajuan Tambang Terbuka........................ 33
v
2.14 Rencana & Realisasi Elevasi Kedalaman Tambang ....................... 34

2.15 Rencana & Realisasi Penempatan Timbunan OB Out Pit Dump. ... 34
2.16 Rencana dan Realisasi Level Kedalaman Tambang Tahun
2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................................................... 35
2.17 Rencana dan Realisasi Penempatan Timbunan Batuan Waste ..... 35
2.18 Rencana dan Realisasi Penambangan Mineral Logam
Berdasarkan Cadangan Tahun 2019 dan RencanaTahun 2020 ..... 36
2.19 Rencana & Realisasi Penambangan Mineral Logam Berdasarkan
Cadangan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020 ........................ 37
2.20 Daftar Peralatan Perusahaan Tahun 2019 dan 2020 ...................... 39
2.21 Daftar Peralatan Pengolahan, Pemuatan dan Pengapalan ............. 40
2.22 Rencana dan Realisasi Jam KerjaTahun 2019 & Tahun 2020 ....... 41
2.23 Rencana dan realisasi Pengelolaan Air Tambang Tahun 2019 dan
Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................................................................... 43
2.24 Rencana & Realisasi Biaya Kegiatan Penambangan Tahun 2019
Dan Rencana Tahun 2020............................................................... 44
2.25 Rencana & Realisasi Penjualan 2019 & Rencana Tahun 2020 ...... 46
2.26 Realisasi Inventory Tahun 2019 ...................................................... 47
2.27 Rencana dan Realisasi Biaya Kegiatan Pemasaran 2019 dan
Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................................................................... 47
2.28 Rencana & Realisasi Kegiatan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan
Lingkungan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................... 49
2.29 Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Lahan untuk Kegiatan
Pertambangan Tahun2019.............................................................. 50
2.30 RencanadanRealisasiPembukaanLahanTahun2019 dan
RencanaTahun2020 ........................................................................ 51
vi
2.31 Rencana & Realisasi Reklamasi Tahun 2019 dan Rencana

Tahun 2020 ..................................................................................... 52
2.32 Rencana dan Realisasi Biaya Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan
Lingkungan Tahun 2019 Serta Rencana Tahun 2020 ................... 54
2.33 Frekuensi Kecelakaan Tahun 2019 ................................................ 55
2.34 Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Cair
Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020 ........................................... 57
2.35 Rencana Pembangunan Tempat Penimbunan Bahan Bakar Cair .. 58
2.36 Rencana Pengujian Kelayakan Penggunaan Peralatan dan / Atau
Instalasi Tahun 2019 ....................................................................... 58
2.37 Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Bahan Berbahaya dan
& Beracun dan Rencana Tahun 2019 ............................................. 59
2.38 Rencana dan Realisasi Biaya Keselamatan Pertambangan Tahun
2019 Dan Rencana Tahun 2020 ..................................................... 63
2.39 Rencana dan Realisasi Standarisasi Tahun 2019 dan
Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................................................................... 65
2.40 Rencana dan Realisasi Usaha Jasa Pertambangan Tahun
Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020 ........................................... 66
2.41 Rencana & Realisasi Penggunaan Tenaga Kerja Tahun 2019 &
Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................................................................... 68
2.42 Rencana & Realisasi Pelatihan Tenaga Kerja Tahun 2019 dan
Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................................................................... 69
2.43 Rencana dan Realisasi Program Pengembangan dan
Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Tahun 2019 & RencanaTahun 2020... 70
2.44 Rencana & Realisasi Belanja barang & Peralatan Tahun 2019
& Rencana Tahun 2020 .................................................................. 72
vii
2.45 Rekomendasi Penerbitan / Perubahan Angka Pengenal Importir

Produsen (API-P) ........................................................................................................... 73
2.46 Rencana & Realisasi Keuangan Tahun 2019 & Rencana Tahun
2020 ................................................................................................ 74
2.47 Rencana dan Realisasi Laporan Neraca Keuangan Tahun
2019 & Rencana Tahun 2020 (Dalam Rp) ...................................... 75
2.48 Rencana dan Realisasi Laporan Laba Rugi Tahun 2019 dan
Rencana Tahun 2020 ...................................................................... 77
2.49 Rencana & Realisasi Laporan Harga Pokok Penjualan Tahun
2019 & Rencana Tahun 2020 ......................................................... 78
2.50 Rencana dan Realisasi Laporan Arus Kas Tahun 2019 dan
& Rencana Tahun 2020................................................................... 79
2.51 Penerimaan Negara Mineral Logam ................................................ 80
2.52 Laporan Investasi ............................................................................ 81
2.53 Rencana Kerja Anggaran Biaya....................................................... 82
2.54 Sumber Pembiayaan ....................................................................... 83
2.55 Detail Pinjaman ............................................................................... 84
3.1 Rencana Strategis Lima Tahun ....................................................... 89
viii
DAFTAR GAMBAR
Gambar 1.1 Struktur Organisasi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama .............................. 4

Gambar 1.2 Peta Topografi IUP OP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama ........................ 6
Gambar 1.3 Peta Kesampaian Lokasi IUP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama .............. 7
Gambar 2.1 Bagan Alir Proses Kegiatan Tambang Bijih Nikel .............................. 26
Gambar 2.2 Geometri Lereng yang Diterapkan di Pit Penambangan ...................... 26
Gambar 2.3 Lereng Tipe 1 ...................................................................................... 27
Gambar 2.4 Lereng Tipe 2 ...................................................................................... 28
ix
DAFTAR LAMPIRAN
Lampiran 1 Peta Topografi

Lampiran 2 Peta Citra satelit
Lampiran 3 Peta geologi
Lampiran 4 Peta sebaran bahan galian
Lampiran 5 Peta realisasi eksplorasi
Lampiran 6 Peta rencana eksplorasi 2020
Lampiran 7 Peta rencana penambangan 2020 + cross section
Lampiran 8 Peta realisasi bukaan lahan tahun 2019
Lampiran 9 Peta rencana bukaan lahan tahun 2020
Lampiran 10 Peta rencana reklamasi tahun 2020
Lampiran 11 Peta penyaliran tambang
Lampiran 12 Peta Rencana pemantauan lingkungan Tahun 2020
Lampiran 13 Peta Realisasi pemantauan lingkungan Tahun 2019
x
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama adalah pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP)
Operasi Produksi nikel sesuai Keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor :
540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan Penyesuaian Kuasa
Pertambangan Eksploitasi menjadi Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi Kepada
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama tanggal 11 Juli 2011, dengan jangka waktu selama 20
tahun untuk komoditas Nikel DMP dengan luas area 2.641 Ha di Desa Ganda-Ganda
dan Tamainusi Kecamatan Petasia dan Soyo Jaya Kabupaten Morowali
Utara.Selanjutnya perubahan kesatu atas keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor : 540.3/
SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan Penyesuaian Kuasa Pertambangan
Eksploitasi menjadi Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber
Swarna Pratama, sesuai Keputusan Gubernur Sulawesi Tengah Nomor : 540/456/IUP-
PR/DPMPTSP/2019 Tanggal 19 September 2019 tentang Perubahan Komposisi
Perubahan saham dan susunan direksi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama.
Pada rencana kegiatan tahun 2019 perusahaan merencanakan kegiatan
pertambangan dan kegiatan pendukung lainnya, sebagaimana digambarkan dibawah
ini,namun sebahagian besar belum terealisasi sehingga akan dilanjutkan pada rencana
kerja tahun 2020. Pada tahun 2020 PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama berencana
melakukan rangkaian kegiatan mulai dari pembangunan infrastruktur, eksplorasi sampai
kegiatan reklamasi.Berikut ringkasan rencana kegiatan tahun 2020 :
1. PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama akan melakukan pemasangan tanda batas

dengan dasar bahwa penambangan dan penimbunan yang dilakukan
berdekatan dengan batas wilayah IUP lain.
2. Kegiatan eksplorasi yang akan dilakukan meliputi pemetaan topografi,
pemetaan geologi, pemboran dan analisa contoh di laboratorium dengan
biaya eksplorasi sebesar US$ 1.461.694,02,-
3. Dalam wilayah IUP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama, rencananya akan dibangun
fasilitas penunjang pertambangan seperti jalan tambang, stockpile, jetty
(untuk sementara kontrak milik PT. COR), workshop, mess karyawan dan
lain-lain dengan biaya sebesar Rp. 507.684.700,-
4. Kegiatan penambangan akan dilakukan mulai awal bulan Januari hingga
Desember 2020 pada lahan seluas 16,67 hektar. Lahan yang ditambang
merupakan bukaan baru, dengan target produksi sebesar 2.600.000 MT,
biaya penambangan dialokasikan sebesar Rp. 17.780.089.950,-
5. PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama belum berencana melakukan pengolahan dan
pemurnian sendiri, dimana proses pengerjaan smeleter dari sesama group
masih dalam progres.
6. Rencana pemasaran akan dilakukan dengan tujuan domestik yaitu pada
smelter PT. Sulawesi Mining Investment di Kabupaten Morowali dan PT. COR
di Kabupaten Morowali Utara Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah dengan biaya
pemasaran sebesar Rp. 13.000.000.000,-.
7. Perlindungan lingkungan yang meliputi pengelolaan dan pemantauan
lingkungan serta reklamasi lahan bekas tambang dilakukan dengan biaya
Rp.1.149.148.500,-
8. Program-program kegiatan dalam upaya keselamatan pertambangan baik
keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja maupun keselamatan operasi akan
dialokasikan biaya sebesar Rp. 480.000.000,-
9. Renacana pengembangan dan pemberdayaan masyarakat (PPM) dilakukan
melaui program pendidikan, kesehatan, peningkatan pendapatan riil atau
penyediaan pekerjaan, kemandirian ekonomi, sosial budaya, pengelolaan
lingkungan sekitar tambang, pembentukan kelembagaan serta pembangunan
infrastruktur dengan alokasi biaya Rp. 535.000.000,- dengan waktu
pelaksanaan selama 12 bulan.
10. Realisasi anggaran biaya tetap kegiatan operasi produksi Tahun 2019
meliputi pembayaran biaya iuran tetap tahunan IUP Operasi Produksi (land
rent), biaya operasional kantor di lokasi tambang, biaya operasional kantor
pusat, biaya kegiatan lapangan dan pembuatan laporan, yang dapat
dirincikan pada table Rencana Kerja berikut :
11. Dalam Rencana strategis 5 tahun akan datang, tetap akan dilakukan tahap
kegiatan pertambangan mulai dari eksplorasi hingga reklamasi. Berikut table
kegiatan yang akan dilakukan dalam rencana strategis 5 tahun yang akan
datang :
BAB I
PENDAHULUAN
1.1 LATAR BELAKANG
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama merupakan perusahaan pemegang Izin
Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi (IUP OP) pertambangan nikel
yang terletak di Desa Ganda-Ganda dan Tamainusi Kecamatan
Petasia dan Soyo Jaya, Kabupaten Morowali Utara, Provinsi Sulawesi
Tengah, berdasarkan Keputusan Bupati Morowali, Nomor :
540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan Penyesuaian
Kuasa Pertambangan Eksploitasi menjadi Izin Usaha Pertambangan
Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama tanggal 11
Juli 2011, dengan jangka waktu selama 20 tahun. Selanjutnya
perubahan kesatu atas keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor : 540.3/
SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan Penyesuaian Kuasa
Pertambangan Eksploitasi menjadi Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi
Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama, sesuai Keputusan
Gubernur Sulawesi Tengah Nomor : 540/456/IUP-PR/DPMPTSP/2019
Tanggal 19 September 2019 tentang Perubahan Komposisi Perubahan
saham dan susunan direksi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama.
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama berencana akan melakukan proses
penambangan setelah tertunda beberapa tahun. Diharapkan agar
pada tahun 2019, PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama dapat melakukan
kegiatan penambangan dengan target produksi 2.600.000 ton per
Page 1
tahun. Berikut kami sajikan profil perusahaan PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama:
Nama : PT. SUMBER SWARNA PRATAMA.
Alamat : Komp. Perkantoran Roxy Mas Blok B1/16
Jl. K.H. Hasyim Ashari No. 125, Jakarta
Telp. (021) 6345974, 6345976,
Fax (021) 6345966
Penanggung Jawab : Sirajuddin Sura
Komoditas : Nikel DMP.
Lokasi IUP : Desa Ganda-Ganda dan Tamainusi
Kecamatan Petasia dan Soyo Jaya
Kabupaten Morowali Utara
Propinsi Sulawesi Tengah
Luas : 2.641 ha.
Sebagai salah satu perusahaan yang telah memiliki legalitas dari
pemerintah, PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama senantiasa mengikuti regulasi
yang ditetapkan dalam pengelolaan pertambangan. Salah satu regulasi
yang harus dipenuhi oleh perusahaan yang bergerak dalam usaha
pertambangan adalah menyusun rencana kerja yang menjadi acuan
dalam melakukan kegiatan pertambangan yang terangkum dalam
Dokumen Rencana Kerja Anggaran Biaya (RKAB).
Dokumen RKAB merupakan dokumen rencana kerja perusahaan
selama 1 tahun anggaran, yang berisi tentang program kerja yang akan
dilaksanakan selama 1 tahun beserta biaya yang ditimbulkannya.
Dokumen RKAB ini disusun atau dibuat oleh manajemen perusahaan dan
Page 2
melibatkan unsur perencana kegiatan, penanggung jawab teknis dan
penanggung jawab keuangan sehingga dokumen ini dapat merangkum
semua kegiatan yang akan dilakukan dan managemen dapat menyiapkan
penganggaran kegiatan yang telah disusun sehingga apa yang
diharapkan dapat berjalan maksimal.
Secara administrative, IUP operasi produksi PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama berada di Desa Ganda-Ganda dan Tamainusi Kecamatan
Petasia dan Soyo Jaya sekarang jadi Kabupaten Morowali Utara dengan
luas wilayah IUP 2.641 hekta.
Page 3
Gambar 1. 1 Struktur Organisasi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
Page 4
Secara geografis, letak wilayah IUP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
terletak pada koordinat berikut :
Tabel .1.1.Koordinat IUP Operasi Produksi

PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
Bujur Timur Lintang Selatan

NO
° ' " ° ' "
1 121 16 7.34 1 51 53.73
2 121 16 18.33 1 51 53.73
3 121 16 18.33 1 52 3.93
4 121 16 25.98 1 52 3.93
5 121 16 25.98 1 52 11.97
6 121 16 32.66 1 52 11.97
7 121 16 32.66 1 52 42.96
8 121 16 21.86 1 52 42.96
9 121 16 21.86 1 52 49.83
10 121 16 15.19 1 52 49.83
11 121 16 15.19 1 55 18.91
12 121 19 23.40 1 55 18.91
13 121 19 23.40 1 55 33.62
14 121 18 5.49 1 55 33.62
15 121 18 5.49 1 55 20.48
16 121 17 55.28 1 55 20.48
17 121 17 55.28 1 55 32.05
18 121 17 43.31 1 55 32.05
19 121 17 43.31 1 55 42.25
20 121 17 29.38 1 55 42.25
21 121 17 29.38 1 55 48.53
22 121 17 15.84 1 55 48.53
23 121 17 15.84 1 55 56.18
24 121 16 19.31 1 55 56.18
25 121 16 19.31 1 56 25.21
26 121 15 21.21 1 56 25.21
27 121 15 21.21 1 55 51.28
28 121 15 3.16 1 55 51.28
29 121 15 3.16 1 55 8.32
30 121 14 37.06 1 55 8.32
31 121 14 37.06 1 54 3.78
32 121 14 20.18 1 54 3.78
33 121 14 20.18 1 53 15.53
34 121 14 1.34 1 53 15.53
Page 5
35 121 14 1.34 1 52 24.33

36 121 15 0.00 1 52 24.33
37 121 15 0.00 1 52 33.16
38 121 15 15.13 1 52 33.16
39 121 15 15.13 1 52 40.22
40 121 15 32.01 1 52 40.22
41 121 15 32.01 1 52 50.61
42 121 16 7.34 1 52 50.61
Gambar.1.2.Peta Topografi IUP OP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
Ada beberapa rute alternatif untuk dapat mencapai lokasi kegiatan
penambangan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama, yaitu :
a. Rute alternatif 1 :
Jakarta - Palu ditempuh selama 2,5 jam dengan pesawat udara,
kemudian dilanjutkan dari Palu ke site Ganda-ganda dan Tamainusi
Page 6
Dengan menggunakan kendaraan roda 4 atau lebih ditempuh
selama 12 Jam
b. Alternatif 2 :
Jakarta - Palu ditempuh selama 2,5 jam dengan pesawat udara,
kemudian Palu – Morowali (Bandara Maleo) selama 1 Jam dengan
menggunakan pesawat udara, Bandara Maleo – Site Ganda-ganda
dan Tamainusi selama 2,5 Jam.
c. Alternatif 3 :
Jakarta – Makassar ditempuh selama 2 jam dengan pesawat
udara, kemudian Makassar- Soroako dengan pesawat udara
selama 1 jam, Soroako Desa Nuha dengan menggunakan perahu
bermotor melalui danau Matano selama 30 menit, desa Nuha-
Petasia dan Soyo Jaya dengan kendaraan roda 4 selama 4 jam.
d. Alternatif 4 :
Jakarta – Makassar ditempuh selama 2 jam dengan pesawat
udara, kemudian Makassar – Morowali (Bandara Maleo) selama 1
Jam dengan menggunakan pesawat udara, Bandara Maleo – Site
selama 2,5 Jam.
Gambar 1.3. Peta Kesampaian Lokasi IUP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
Page 7
Page 8
1.2 LEGALITAS
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama telah mendapatkan Izin Usaha
Pertambangan pada tahap Operasi Produksi sebagaimana sebagaimana
Keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor: 540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011.
Tentang Persetujuan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama.
Berikut akan ditampilkan data administrasi perusahaan sebagai
berikut :
Page 9
Tabel 1.2: Data Administrasi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama

No URAIAN KETERANGAN
1 Nama Perusahaan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
2 NPWP NPWP: 31.185.299.0-833.001
3 Nomor SK IUP/IUPK 540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011
4 Status IUP/IUPK IUP Operasi Produksi
5 Kode WIUP/WIUPK MW096
6 Komoditas Nikel DMP
7 Jangka Waktu WIUP/WIUPK 08-Jul-31
8 Kepala Teknik Tambang Marten Guruh
9 Persetujuan Dokumen Lingkungan No: 660.1/20.A/KLH/II/2011
10 Persetujuan Studi Kelayakan -
Tanggal Persetujuan -
Kapasitas Produksi Pertahun (Ton)
a. Tambang 3.125.000
b. Pengolahan -
11 Rencana Produksi Tahun 2019
a. Tambang 2.600.000
b. Pengolahan -
12 Kawasan Hutan (ha) Bukan
Kawasan
Luas Wilayah Izin Operasi Produksi HPK HL HP Hutan (ha)
- 1.949 194 498
Total Luas Wilayah 2.641
13 Luas Project Area 20 Ha
14 Ijin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan No -
(IPPKH) untuk Operasi Produksi Tanggal -
15
Luas wilayah Pinjam Pakai Kawasan
-
Hutan Untuk Operasi Produksi
16 Pemegang Saham 1 H. Surianto 87%
2 Moh. Fikri Dwi Putra 8%
3 Mierna Lukman, S.Sos 5%
17 Susunan Pengurus Dirut Sirajuddin
Direktur Moh. Fikri Dwi Putra
Komisaris H. Surianto, AM, S.AG., MM

Andi Abdullah
Mierna Lukman, S.Sos
Page 10
Untuk menjalankan amanah sesuai Peraturan Menteri ESDM Nomor:
25 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengusahaan Mineral dan Batubara yang terdapat
pada pasal 14 yang mewajibkan perusahaan untuk pemasangan tanda
batas IUP Operasi produksi maka pada tahun 2019 telah direncanakan
kegiatan pemasangan tanda batas dengan mengacu pada Keputusan
Menteri ESDM Nomor: 1825.K/30/MEM/2018 tentang Pedoman
Pemasangan Tanda Batas Wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan Atau
Wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan Khusus Operasi Produksi. Terkait
dengan hal ini akan direncanakan pemasangan tanda batas pada lokasi
rencana penggalian dan penimbunan yang dekat dengan batas IUP yaitu
sebanyak 8 titik dan masuk dalam kawasan Area Penggunaan Lain (APL)
Tabel 1.3 Rencana Kegiatan Pemasangan Tanda Batas Tahun 2020
Jumlah Titik Jumlah Tanda Biaya (Rp.)

No Kegiatan Status Keterangan
Batas Batas Rencana Realisasi
Pengukuran dan
1 Pemasangan Tanda Belum 8 72.000.000 Semester II
Batas
Penyampaian Laporan
42
Pelaksaan Kegiatan
2 Belum 8 10.000.000 Semester II
Pemasangan Tanda
Batas
3 Penetapan Tanda Batas Belum 1 10.000.000 Semester II
Total 92.000.000
Page 11
Tabel 1.4 Rencana Kegiatan Pemeliharaan dan Perawatan Tanda Batas Tahun 2020
Pelaksanaan Tahun Berjalan Rencana Tahun Depan

Semester I Semester II Semester I Semester II
No Keterangan
Biaya Biaya
Jumlah Jumlah Jumlah Biaya Jumlah Biaya
Rencana Realisasi Rencana Realisasi
1 Tanda Batas Sudut - 8 72.000.000
2 Tanda Batas Referensi - - -
3 Tanda Batas Perapatan - - -
4 Penyampaian Laporan *) (No. dan Tanggal surat) (No. dan Tanggal surat) - 1 20.000.000
Page 12
BAB II
PERSETUJUAN DAN REALISASI RKAB TAHUN 2019
SERTA RKAB TAHUN 2020
2.1 KEGIATAN EKSPLORASI
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama memiliki lokasi IUP Operasi Produksi
seluas 2.641 Hektar dimana peruntukan kawasan pada lokasi ini
sebanyak 498 Ha masuk dalam kawasan Area Penggunaan Lain (APL).
Dan selebihnya masuk dalam kawasan Hutan Lindung (HL) dan Hutan
Produksi (HP). Oleh sebab itu pada saat kegiatan eksplorasi dilaksanakan
semua lokasi yang masuk dalam kawasan APL sudah dilakukan
eksplorasi sehingga diketahui potensinya.
2.1.1 Rekapitulasi Kegiatan Eksplorasi Sampai Tahun 2019
Kegiatan eksplorasi berupa pemetaan geologi maupun pemetaan
telah dilakukan selama kegiatan eksplorasi pada tahun 2010-2011.
Rekapitulasi sampai tahun 2019 kegiatan eksplorasi detail telah dilakukan
pada Blok GGU dan GGS berupa kegiatan sumur uji, parit uji, dan
pemboran. Untuk lebih jelasnya dapat dilihat pada tabel berikut:
Page 13
Page 14
2.1.1 Rencana dan Realisasi Kegiatan Eksplorasi Tahun 2019 dan
Rencana Kegiatan Eksplorasi Tahun 2020
Pada tahun 2019 Kegiatan pemetaan geologi tidak dilakukan
karena gambaran mengenai sebaran bahan galian dan juga kondisi
geomorfologi, struktur dan stratigrafi telah tercover dalam peta
geologi lokal PT.Sumber Swarna Pratama. Untuk kegiatan pemetaan
topografi pada tahun 2019 Rencana pemetaan tahun 2019 adalah
334 hektar, data hasil pemetaan topografi ini akan digunakan
sebagai data base perencanaan tambang dan kemajuan tambang
tahun 2019. Pada rencana tahun 2020 kegiatan pemetaan topografi
akan dilakukan kembali untuk memperluas wilayah yang akan
direncanakan untuk kegiatan penambangan, Disamping itu pula akan
dilakukan pengujian sample dari kegiatan penambangan untuk
mengetahui kadar bahan galian yang ditambang serta melakukan uji
geoteknik. Untuk lebih jelasnya dapat dilihat pada tabel berikut :
Page 15
Tabel 2.2 : Rencana dan Realisasi Kegiatan Eksplorasi Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
LOKASI BIAYA SATUAN RENCANA TAHUN 2019 REALISASI TAHUN 2019 RENCANA TAHUN 2020
KEGIATAN SATUAN *)
KEGIATAN (Rp per Satuan) KEGIATAN BIAYA KEGIATAN BIAYA KEGIATAN BIAYA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Studi Indraja
Pemetaan
- Topografi ha 400.000,00 166,65 66.660.000,00 166,65 66.660.000,00 160,00 64.000.000,00
- Geologi lokal ha 250.000,00 115,00 28.750.000,00 115,00 28.750.000,00 160,00 40.000.000,00
Survei Geokimia
Survei Geofisika 3.140.000,00 10,00 31.400.000,00
Pengeboran Open
Hole
- Jumlah titik
- Kedalaman m
- Spasi Pengeboran m
Blok GGU Pengeboran Coring
dan Blok
GGS - Jumlah titik
- Kedalaman m 25.000,00 6.000,00 150.000.000,00 6.000,00 150.000.000,00 5.100,00 127.500.000,00
- Spasi m
Pengeboran -
Sumur Uji m -
Parit Uji m 485.000,00 - 30,00 14.550.000,00
Analisa Conto sampel 50.000,00 2.400,00 120.000.000,00 2.400,00 120.000.000,00 3.500,00 175.000.000,00
Analisa Geoteknik sampel 2.000.000,00 20,00 40.000.000,00 20,00 40.000.000,00 20,00 40.000.000,00
Analisa Metalurgi sampel
Kegiatan teknis dan
non teknis yang
terkait kegiatan
eksplorasi**)
TOTAL BIAYA EKSPLORASI 405.410.000,00 405.410.000,00 492.450.000,00
Page 16
2.1.2 Biaya Eksplorasi
Setelah kegiatan eksplorasi lengkap telah dilakukan pada
wilayah potensi IUP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama pada tahun
2010 – 2011, maka kegiatan eksplorasi lanjutan yang dilakukan
yaitu ekaplorasi detail untuk memverifikasi nilai sumberdaya dan
cadangan pada wilayah blok prospek yaitu blok GGU dan blok GGS
seluas 334 Ha yang telah dilakukan pada tahun 2017 dan pada
tahun 2018 adalah kegiatan pemetaan topografi, uji sample dan uji
geoteknik. Dilanjutkan kegiatan eksplorasi yang dilakukan pada
tahun 2019 adalah kegiatan pemetaan topografi, uji sample dan uji
geoteknik dengan rencana biaya sebesar Rp. 627.050,000 dan biaya
tidak langsung berupa gaji, biaya administrasi, biaya konsumsi dan
biaya lain-lain Rp. 221,640,000. Jadi total biaya yang direncanakan
sebesar Rp. 627,050,000. Realisasi yang dicapai pada tahun 2019
untuk total kegiatan topografi dan lain-lain adalah Rp. 295.616.000,-
Pada tahun 2020 PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama kembali
merencanakan program kegiatan pemetaan topografi, uji sample dan
uji geoteknik pada lokasi yang akan ditambang dengan jumlah
rencana biaya adalah Rp. 492.450.000,-. Untuk lebih jelasnya dapat
dilihat pada tabel berikut :
Page 17
Tabel 2.3 : Biaya Eksplorasi
Rencana 2019 Realisasi 2019 Rencana 2020

Pengembangan Pengembangan Pengembangan
Sumber daya Verifikasi Sumber daya Verifikasi Sumber daya Verifikasi
Keterangan TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
(Resources Cadangan (Resources Cadangan (Resources Cadangan
Development) Development) Development)
(Rp) (Rp) (Rp) (Rp) (Rp) (Rp) (Rp) (Rp) (Rp)
1 2 3 2 3 2 3
Biaya Langsung, terdiri dari:
1 Pengeboran Coring 150.000.000,00 150.000.000,00 66.660.000,00 66.660.000,00 64.000.000,00 64.000.000,00

2 Sumur Uji 28.750.000,00 28.750.000,00 40.000.000,00 40.000.000,00
3 Parit Uji - - - -
4 Analisa Conto 120.000.000,00 120.000.000,00 - - 31.400.000,00 31.400.000,00
5 Analisa Geoteknik 40.000.000,00 40.000.000,00 - - 40.000.000,00 40.000.000,00
6 Pemetaan Topografi 66.660.000,00 66.660.000,00 - - 66.660.000,00 66.660.000,00
7 Pemetaan Geologi Lokal 28.750.000,00 28.750.000,00 - - 28.750.000,00 28.750.000,00
8 Survei Geofisika - - - -
Biaya Tidak Langsung, terdiri
dari:
1 Gaji 53.571.000,00 53.571.000,00 48.600.000,00 48.600.000,00 53.571.000,00 53.571.000,00
2 Administrasi 39.285.000,00 39.285.000,00 39.285.000,00 39.285.000,00 39.285.000,00 39.285.000,00
3 Konsumsi 87.142.500,00 87.142.500,00 77.321.000,00 77.321.000,00 87.142.500,00 87.142.500,00
4 Biaya Lain-Lain 41.641.500,00 41.641.500,00 35.000.000,00 35.000.000,00 41.641.500,00 41.641.500,00
Total Biaya 627.050.000,00 627.050.000,00 295.616.000,00 295.616.000,00 492.450.000,00 492.450.000,00
Page 18
2.1.4 Neraca Sumberdaya dan Cadangan
Perhitungan nilai sumberdaya dan cadangan pada tahun 2019
masih menggunakan data hasil kegiatan eksplorasi tahun 2011
karena sampai saat ini belum ada kegiatan eksplorasi tambahan.
Kegiatan eksplorasi pada tahun 2019 masih berjalan dibulan
Desember 2019, maka belum ada perubahan cadangan untuk
tahun 2020 karena hasilnya belum dilaporkan dalam dokumen ini.
Untuk lebih jelasnya neraca sumberdaya dan cadangan dapat
dilihat pada tabel berikut:
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
2.1.5 Rekonsiliasi Grade Control, Cadangan Bijih dan Bijih Ditambang
Bahan Galian Nikel dmp
Berdasarkan data perusahaan dengan belum adanya kegiatan
produksi pada tahun 2019 sampai penyusunan dokumen RKAB ini
dilakukan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama belum melakukan penjualan
sehingga rekonsiliasi grade control seperti tergambar dibawah ini :
Tabel 2.6 : Rekonsiliasi Grade Control, Cadangan Bijih dan Bijih Yang Ditambang
Grade Ni Grade Fe Logam Ni Logam Fe

No Data
(g/t) (g/t) (Oz) (Oz)
1 Declared Ore Mined (DOM)/Bijih yang ditambang 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Grade Control (GC)/Kadar logam dari bijih yang
2 0,00 0,00
ditambang 0,00 0,00
3 Ore Reserve (OR)/Cadangan Bijih yang dilaporkan 1,95 32,26 37.928.386,00 1.175.709,42
4 DOM/GC % 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
5 DOM/OR % 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
6 GC/OR % 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2.1.6 Pernyataan Kompeten Person
Dalam melakukan evaluasi sumber daya dan cadangan, PT. Sumber
Swarna Pratama memiliki competen person sehingga sebagai
penanggung jawab kegiatan eksplorasi dan perhitungan
cadangannya yaitu sebagai berikut :
Tabel 2.7 Pernyataan Competent Person
Nama Kategori Competent Person Komoditas

No
1 2 3
1 David Frans Siregar, ST Sumberdaya dan Cadangan Nikel
2
3
Page 22
2.2 KONSTRUKSI DAN INFRASTRUKTUR
2.2.1 Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur
Pada Tahun 2019 kegiatan konstruksi dilakukan untuk
pembangunan semua fasilitas yang akan digunakan dalam kegiatan
pertambangan yaitu meliputi jalan hauling, kantor, workshop,
stockpile dan lain-lain, namun pada tahun 2020 kegiatan konstruksi
dilakukan untuk pembangunan semua fasilitas yang akan digunakan
Page 23
dalam kegiatan pertambangan yaitu meliputi jalan hauling, kantor,
workshop, stockpile dan lain-lain.
2.2.2 Biaya Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur
Biaya yang dikeluarkan untuk kegiatan konstruksi dan
infrastruktur pada tahun 2019 yaitu sebesar Rp. 572.289.000,-. Pada
tahun 2020 akan dilakukan pembangunan sarana penunjang dengan
encana biaya yang dianggarkan untuk kegiatan tersebut yaitu
sebesar Rp. 1.820,000,000. Berikut dapat dilihat pada tabel berikut:

Tabel 2.8 Rencana dan Realisasi Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Tambang Tahun 2019
Rencana 2019 Realisasi 2019 PERSENTASE

No KEGIATAN LOKASI PENCAPAIAN KETERANGAN
Kuantitas Biaya Kuantitas Biaya (%)
1 Jalan (KM)
a. Jalan Hauling Luar IUP 4,97 4,97 - 100 Sistem sewa dgn PT. CORI
b. Jalan Hauling Dalam IUP 9,78 489.000.000 9,78 489.000.000,00 100 -
2 Bangunan (Ha)
a. Basecamp dan Kantor Dalam IUP 3,75 225.000 0,75 45.000,00 20 -
b. Workshop Dalam IUP 1 150.000 - - Belum Ada Progres
c. Pos Security Dalam IUP 0,02 6.200 - - Belum Ada Progres
d. Gudang Genset Dalam IUP 0,01 3.500 - - Belum Ada Progres
e. Laboratorium Dalam IUP 0,01 50.000 - - Belum Ada Progres
g. Jetty Luar IUP 0,5 0,50 Sistem sewa dgn PT. COR
h. Stockfile (ETO) Dalam IUP 4,3 43.000.000 4,30 43.000.000 100
h. Stockfile (EFO) Luar IUP 2,0 2,00 Sistem sewa dgn PT. CORI
i. Disposal Dalam IUP 5,6 28.000.000 5,60 28.000.000 100
j. Sedimen pond Dalam IUP 3,5 175.000.000 0,24 854.237 52
k. Saluran drainase Dalam IUP 14,8 52.500.000 3,20 11.389.831 35,25
TOTAL 787.934.700 572.289.068
Tabel 2.9 : Rencana Konstruksi dan Infrastruktur Tahun 2020
VOLUME PEKERJAAN RENCANA BIAYA

NO KEGIATAN LOKASI
KUANTITAS SATUAN SATUAN (Rp) JUMLAH
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Bangunan
a. Basecamp dan Kantor Dalam IUP 480,00 m² 600.000 288.000.000
b. Workshop Dalam IUP 350,00 m² 1.000.000 350.000.000
c. Pos Security Dalam IUP 25,00 m² 1.000.000 25.000.000
d. Gudang Genset Dalam IUP 36,00 m² 3.000.000 108.000.000
e. Laboratorium Dalam IUP 1,00 m² 500.000.000 500.000.000
2 g. Jetty Luar IUP 0,5 Ha 800.000.000 400.000.000
h. Stockfile (ETO) Dalam IUP 4,3 Ha 5.000.000 21.500.000
h. Stockfile (EFO) Luar IUP 2,0 Ha 5.000.000 10.000.000
i. Disposal Dalam IUP 5,6 Ha 5.000.000 28.000.000
j. Sedimen pond Dalam IUP 3,5 Ha 15.000.000 52.500.000
k. Saluran drainase Dalam IUP 14,8 Ha 2.500.000 37.000.000
TOTAL 1.820.000.000
Page 24
2.3 KEGIATAN PENAMBANGAN
2.3.1 Metode Penambangan
Tahap Operasi penambangan terdiri dari kegiatan
pembersihan lahan (land clearing), pengupasan tanah pucuk (top
soil) kemudian diikuti stripping overburden (lapisan penutup) yang
dilanjutkan dengan penggalian, pemuatan, pengangkutan dan
penumpukan baik di Stockpile ( untuk bijih ) maupun di waste dump
area untuk lapisan penutup (bagian dari kadar bijih yang kadarnya
dibawah COG). Kegiatan-kegiatan tersebut dilaksanakan secara
berkelanjutan.
Pada kegiatan penambangan di Blok GGU, dengan kondisi
bukaan tambang baru overburden akan ditumpuk di disposal area
yang telah disiapkan.
Sistem penambangan yang akan digunakan adalah metode
tambang terbuka (open cut dan open pit) dengan mengikuti arah
contour. Arah kemajuan penambangan akan mengikuti pola sebaran
lapisan nikel pada setiap lokasi yang akan ditambang. cara
penambangan dengan metode back filling dengan COG 1,68% yang
disesuaikan dengan squen penambangan yang direncanakan.
Tahun 2020 perusahaan akan menamban dan menjual ore
dengan kadar 1,68%, namun untuk kadar <1,68% yang belum
ditambang, akan didata dan disimpan sehingga apabila suatu waktu
kebutuhan pasar dapat memanfaatkan kadar tersebut maka akan
dilakukan penembangan pada lokasi yang terdata tersebut. Namun
Page 25
apabila dalam penambangan telah tergali ore nikel yang kadarnya <
1,68 maka ore tersebut akan disimpan di stockpile yang telah
disediakan.
Gambar 2.1 : Bagan Alir Proses Penambangan
Jenjang penggalian di pit penambangan akan dibuat dengan
multi jenjang sesuai dengan ondisi lereng yang dibentuk. Untuk
operasional dan mempertimbangkan faktor keamanan lebar jenjang
yang dibuat adalah 2,5 meter dengan ketinggian maksimal 5 meter.
Gambar 2.2 Geometri Lereng yang Diterapkan di Pit Penambangan
Page 26
Standar faktor keamanan untuk kestabilan lereng pada lokasi
pit penambangan adalah 1,2 untuk kondisi jangka panjang dan 1,1
untuk kondisi kegempaan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis Geoteknik
yang telah dilakukan, maka akan digunakan jenjang 1 (vertikal) : 1,2
(horisontal) untuk lereng keseluruhan dengan tinggi 25 m.
Berdasarkan rekomendasi geoteknik, total ketinggian dari
semua jenjang bias mencapai 25 meter. Geometri muka tambang
dengan multi jenjang direkomendasikan dengan analisis faktor
keamanan. Minimum factor keamanan adalah 1,2. Desain muka
tambang akan mengikuti petunjuk dari lereng muka tambang 5 meter
dan berm 2,5 meter. Faktor keselamatan dari geometri muka
tambang adalah 1,422 dengan metode penggalian langsung. Berikut
ilustrasi desain jenjang yang akan dibuat :
Gambar 2.3 Lereng Tipe 1
Page 27
Gambar 2.4 Lereng Tipe 2
Semua desain pit terbuka telah dibuat dengan perangkat
lunak Surpac 6.02 setelah dilakukan transfer binary dari blok
model Surpac yang disediakan dari grup geologi. Desain ini

0
berdasarkan zona mineralisasi dengan sudut muka jenjang 56
untuk penggalian cut and fill kemiringan muka jenjang 450
dengan lebar berm 2,0 m dan tinggi bench 5 m.
2.3.2 Rencana Perubahan Studi Kelayakan
Sesuai target produksi yang direncanakan yaitu sebesar
2.000,000 Ton pada tahun 2020 PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama yang
sudah disesuaikan dengan perubahan Dokumen Studi Kelayakan.
2.3.3 Pengupasan dan Penimbunan Overburden/Batuan Penutup
Pengupasan tanah pucuk (Top Soil) setelah lahan dibersihkan,
dari pepohonan dan semak-semak (Land Clearing). Tanah pucuk
Page 28
dikupas dengan ketebalan 0 m - 1 m, kemudian ditimbun pada suatu
tempat tertentu (Top Soil Area) yang terlindung dari adanya erosi
serta lokasi penimbunannya diusahakan mudah dijangkau. Dalam
rancangannya, tanah penutup (overburden) yang telah dikupas,
sebagian akan di tumpuk di Tempat penimbunan Overburden atau
Disposal area. Sebagian lagi akan ditempatkan/ditimbun ke daerah
yang sudah ditambang (mine Out) yang tidak jauh dari pit
penambangan (Backfill). Berikut rincian rencana pengupasan dan
penimbunan Tanah Pucuk dan Overburden.
Pada tahun 2020 direncanakan kegiatan penambangan pada
Blok GGU dan GGS yang sebagian overburdennya akan ditimbun di
Disposal area yang telah disiapkan.
Berikut realisasi pengupasan dan penimbunan overburden
pada tahun 2019 dan rencana tahun 2020 dapat dilihat pada tabel
berikut:
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Tabel 2.11 : Rencana dan Realisasi Pengupasan Overburden (OB)/Batuan Penutup
RENCANA TAHUN 2019 (BCM) REALISASI TAHUN 2019 (BCM) RENCANA TAHUN 2020 (BCM)
BULAN
INPIT OUTPIT TOTAL INPIT OUTPIT TOTAL INPIT OUTPIT TOTAL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Januari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 372.000 372.000
Februari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 362.000 362.000
Maret 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 371.733 371.733
April 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 363.667 363.667
Mei 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 325.000 325.000
Juni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 330.133 330.133
Juli 0 0 0 0 0 0 176.600 176.600 353.200
Agustus 0 0 0 0 0 0 175.167 175.167 350.333
September 0 0 0 0 0 0 162.733 162.733 325.467
Oktober 0 0 0 0 0 0 329.533 0 329.533
November 0 0 0 0 0 0 339.400 0 339.400
Desember 666.263,80 0 666.263,80 0 0 0 173.367 173.367 346.733
TOTAL 666.263,80 0 666.263,80 0 0 0 1.356.800 2.812.400 4.169.200
Tabel 2.12 : Rencana dan Realisasi Inpit dan Outpit Dump Tambang Terbuka
RENCANA TAHUN 2019 REALISASI TAHUN 2019 RENCANA TAHUN 2020

REALISASI LUAS
INPIT OUTPIT INPIT OUTPIT INPIT OUTPIT
LOKASI VOID TAHUN 2019 KETERANGAN
JUMLAH JUMLAH JUMLAH JUMLAH JUMLAH JUMLAH
LOKASI LOKASI LOKASI LOKASI LOKASI LOKASI (ha)
(BCM) (BCM) (BCM) (BCM) (BCM) (BCM)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
BLOK GGU & PIT C, A, B, PIT C, A, B, PIT C, A, PIT C, A, B,

666.264 1.356.800 2.812.400 -
GGS D, E & H D, E & H B, D, E, H D, E, H
-
TOTAL 666.264 - -
Tabe l 2.13 : Re ncana dan Re alisasi Ke majuan Tambang Te rbuka
Deskripsi
Rencana dan Realisasi Lokasi/Blok/Pit
Tambang Aktif (Ha) Tambang Selesai (Ha)
GGU PIT C 2,52
GGS PIT A 2,00
GGS PIT B 2,35
Rencana Tahun 2019 GGS PIT D 2,40
GGS PIT E 1,50
GGS PIT H 1,45
Total 12,22
GGU PIT C - -
GGS PIT A -
GGS PIT B -
Realisasi Tahun 2019 GGS PIT D -
GGS PIT E -
GGS PIT H -
Total -
GGU & GGS PIT C, A, B, D, E & H -
Kumulatif S/D 2019
Total Total -
GGU PIT C 3,22
GGS PIT A 3,79
GGS PIT B 2,04
Rencana Tahun 2020 GGS PIT D 2,34
GGS PIT E 3,22
GGS PIT H 2,06
Total Total 16,67
Page 33
Tabel 2.15 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penempatan Timbunan OB Out Pit Dump
Deskripsi
Rencana & Realisasi Lokasi Timbunan Timbunan Timbunan Volume Dimensi Timbunan
Aktif (ha) Selesai (ha) (bcm) (m)
1 2 3 4 5 6
RENCANA TAHUN PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 6,64 0 403.400 2 (100mx80mx6m)
2019 TOTAL / Rata-rata 6,64 0 403.400 -
REALISASI TAHUN PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 0 0 -
2019 TOTAL / Rata-rata 0,00 0
KUMULATIF S/D PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 0 0 0 -
TAHUN 2019 TOTAL / Rata-rata 0 0 0
RENCANA TAHUN PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 4,3 0 240.000 2 (100mx200mx6m)
2020 TOTAL / Rata-rata 4,30 0 240.000
Page 34
Tabel 2.17 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penempatan Timbunan Batuan Waste
Deskripsi
Rencana & Realisasi Lokasi/Blok Timbunan Timbunan Volume Dimensi Timbunan
Aktif (ha) Selesai (ha) (bcm) (m)
RENCANA TAHUN PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 6,64 403.400 2 (100mx80mx6m)

2019 TOTAL / Rata-rata 6,64 403.400
REALISASI TAHUN PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 0 0 -
2019 TOTAL / Rata-rata 0 0 0,00
PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 0 0 -
KUMULATIF S/D 2019
TOTAL / Rata-rata 0 0 0,00
RENCANA TAHUN PIT C, A, B, D, E & H 4,30 240.000 2 (100mx200mx6m)
2020 TOTAL / Rata-rata 4,30 240.000 2 (100mx200mx6m)
2.3.4 Produksi
Perencanaan tahun 2019 belum ada kegiatan produksi dan
pada tahun 2020 direncanakan penambangan pada Blok GGU dan
GGS dengan rencana produksi sebesar 2.000.000 ton hingga bulan
Desember 2020. Berikut rencana dan realisasi produksi tahun 2019
dan rencana produksi tahun 2020 dapat dilihat pada tabel berikut:
Page 35
Tabel 2.18 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penambangan Mineral Logam Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Rencana dan Cut Of BULAN
Lokasi/Blok/Pit TOTAL
Realisasi Grade Jan Feb Mar Apr Mei Jun Jul Agus Sept Okt Nov Des
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
BLOK GGU PIIT C 1,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153.600 153.600 153.600 155.621 616.421
BLOK GGS PIT A 1,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55.000 55.000
BLOK GGS PIT B 1,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.000 30.000
Rencana BLOK GGS PIT D 1,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.000 25.000
Tahun 2019 BLOK GGS PIT E 1,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50.000 50.000
BLOK GGS PIT H 1,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.000 30.000
TOTAL 1,68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153.600 153.600 153.600 345.621 806.421
Recovery Penambangan 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96
BLOK GGU PIIT C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BLOK GGS PIT A
BLOK GGS PIT B
BLOK GGS PIT D
Realisasi
BLOK GGS PIT E
Tahun 2019
BLOK GGS PIT H
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Recovery Truck Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Penambangan Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GGU PIT C 1,68 10.000 30.000 30.000 30.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 260.000
GGS PIT A 1,68 25.000 45.000 50.000 50.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 490.000
GGS PIT B 1,68 10.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 20.000 250.000
Rencana GGS PIT D 1,68 10.000 20.000 20.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 20.000 270.000
Tahun 2020 GGS PIT E 1,68 30.000 45.000 45.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 40.000 480.000
GGS PIT H 1,68 10.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 20.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 25.000 20.000 250.000
TOTAL 1,68 2.000.000
Recovery Penambangan 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0,96
Page 36
Tabel 2.19 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penambangan Mineral Logam

Berdasarkan Cadangan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
BLOK GGU & GGS

Rencana dan KOMODITAS NIKEL
Type Jumlah Telah Tebal/
Realisasi Kualitas/ Ditambang
Cadangan Ditambang Dimensi
Kadar (Ton)
Terkira (Ton) (Ton) (M/M3)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
RENCANA Komoditas: 38.657.866 0 1,68 806.421 4- 8
TAHUN 2019 Endapan Nikel
REALISASI Komoditas: 38.657.866 0 0 0 0
RENCANA Komoditas: 38.657.866 0 1,67 - 1,92 2.000.000 4- 8
Page 37
2.3.5 Recovery Penambangan
Penambangan tahun 2019 belum dilakukan namun pada tahun
2020 dengan rencana penambangan yang dilakukan akan
ditargetkan recovery penambangan sebesar 96%.
Recovery ini bias dicapai dengan beberapa alas an yaitu : akan
dilakukan pemboran detail untuk mengetahui kondisi cadangan
dengan akurat, penggunaan alat yang sesuai kondisi lokasi dan
pengawasan yang optimal.
2.3.6 Daftar Peralatan Penambangan, Pengangkutan dan Penunjang,
Jam Kerja, Pengelolaan Air dan Pengelolaan Geoteknik
Tambang
Peralatan penambangan yang digunakan PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama untuk kegiatan penambangan terdiri dari alat gali/muat
excavator komatsu PC. 200 dengan kapasitas 0.9 m3, alat angkut
tipe Hino FM 260 dengan kiapasitas 25 Ton, serta beberapa alat
penunjang seperti Grader, Dozer, Lighting tower dan peralatan
lainnya.
Pada tahun 2019 digunakan 10 excavator untuk kegiatan
penambangan dan 18 Unit Dumptruck. Untuk lebih jelasnya rencana
dan realisasi penggunaan peralatan penambangan pada tahun 2018
dan rencana tahun 2019 dapat dilihat pada tabel berikut:
Page 38
Page 39
Dalam rencana penambangan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
tidak ada kegiatan pengolahan, jadi tidak ada rencana penggunaan
peralatan pengolahan. Sementara untuk kegiatan pengapalan akan
digunakan excavator PC 200 dan dump truck kapasitas 17 m3.
Tabel 2.21 Daftar Peralatan Pengolahan, Pemuatan dan Pengapalan
PT. ASI merupakan pabrik pengolahan tambang yang mengolah
bijih nikel laterit menjadi logam Nickel Pig Iron (NPI) dengan metode
peleburan menggunakan teknologi Blast Furnace. Bijih nikel yang akan
dilebur berasal dari Kabupaten Morowali, Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah.
Peralatan utama di pabrik ini yaitu mesin Sintering dan Blast Furnace.
Alat utama pada proses pengolahan bijih nikel di pabrik ini yaitu
Blast Furnace. Bijih nikel laterit perlu dibuat sinter terlebih dahulu di
mesin Sintering. Hal tersebut dilakukan agar proses peleburan di dalam
Page 40
Blast Furnace berjalan dengan optimal. Material untuk pembuatan sinter
terdiri atas bijih nikel halus, batubara, dan quicklime halus. Semua bahan
baku tersebut dilakukan pengecilan ukuran terlebih dahulu agar
ketercampuran material tersebut dapat maksimal. Pencampuran
diharuskan maksimal agar pembakaran yang tercipta di mesin Sintering
terjadi secara optimal.
Page 41
Dalam rencana pengelolaan air tambang akan dilakukan
pembuatan sedimen pond dan saluran drainase. Pada tahun 2019
belum dilakukan pemompaan karena belum ada bukaan lahan. Pada
tahun 2020 direncanakan penggunaan pompa untuk management air
limpasan tambang. Untuk lebih jelasnya dapat dilihat pada tabel
berikut:
Page 42
2.3.7 Biaya Penambangan
Biaya penambangan terdiri dari biaya biaya land clearing, biaya
overburden removal, biaya mineral getting serta biaya reconturing.
Pada tahun 2019 belum ada biaya penambangan yang
direncanakan. Pada tahun 2020 direncanakan produksi sebesar
2.000.000 Ton dengan rencana biaya penambangan sebesar
Rp. 80.703.010.750 Untuk lebih jelasnya dapat dilihat pada tabel
berikut:
Page 43
Tabel 2.24 : Rencana dan Realisasi Biaya Kegiatan P enambangan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
De sk ri psi
Re ncana &
No Lok asi Blok /PIT De sk ri psi Land Clearing Overburden Removal Mineral Getting Reconturing
Re ali sasi Jumlah (Rp)
(Ha) (Bcm) (Ton) (Ha)
Kuanti tas 2,5 104.000 806.421 1,0 -
GGU/PIT C
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639.000 17.913.000 67.011.750 -
Kuanti tas 12,2 108.000 108.000 1,0 -

GGS/PIT H
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639.000 17.913.000 67.011.750 -
Kuanti tas 12,3 130.263 130.263 1,0 -

GGS/PIT A
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639.000 17.913.000 67.011.750 -
Re ncana T ahun
1
2019 Kuanti tas 6,0 108.000 260.000 1,0 -
GGS/PIT B
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639.000 17.913.000 67.011.750 -
Kuanti tas 2,1 108.000 2.000.000 1,0 -

GGS/PIT D
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639.000 17.913.000 67.011.750 -
Kuanti tas 16,7 108.000 0 1,0 -

GGS/PIT E
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639.000 17.913.000 67.011.750 -
De sk ri psi
Lok asi Blok /PIT De sk ri psi Land Clearing Overburden Removal Mineral Getting Reconturing
Jumlah (Rp)
Kuanti tas -
GGU/PIT C
Satuan Bi aya -
Kuanti tas -
GGS/PIT H
Satuan Bi aya -
Kuanti tas -
Re ali sasi
2 GGS/PIT A
T ahun 2019 Satuan Bi aya -
Kuanti tas -
GGS/PIT B
Satuan Bi aya -
Kuanti tas -
GGS/PIT D
Satuan Bi aya -
Kuanti tas -
GGS/PIT E
Satuan Bi aya -
De sk ri psi
Lok asi Blok /PIT De sk ri psi Land Clearing Overburden Removal Mineral Getting Reconturing
Jumlah (Rp)
Kuanti tas 3,2 1.389.474 260.000 1,2
GGU/PIT C
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639 17.913 67.011.750 19.525.234.626,3
Kuanti tas 2,1 231.579 250.000 1,0

GGS/PIT H
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639 17.913 67.011.750 7.012.120.171,1
Kuanti tas 3,8 1.389.474 490.000 1,4

Re ncana T ahun
3 GGS/PIT A
2020 Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639 17.913 67.011.750 23.659.481.976,3
Kuanti tas 2,0 277.895 250.000 1,0

GGS/PIT B
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639 17.913 67.011.750 7.504.843.855,3
Kuanti tas 2,3 231.579 270.000 1,0

GGS/PIT D
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639 17.913 67.011.750 7.370.800.171,1
Kuanti tas 3,2 649.200 480.000 1,8

GGS/PIT E
Satuan Bi aya 1.500.000 10.639 17.913 67.011.750 15.630.529.950,0
Page 44
2.4 PENGOLAHAN DAN PEMURNIAN ATAU PENCUCIAN
Dalam rencana kegiatan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama pada tahun
2019 tidak ada kegiatan pengolahan, begitu juga pada rencana kegiatan
pada tahun 2020. Olehnya itu penjualan dan pemasaran ore akan
dilakukan pada smelter yang berada dalam negeri khususnya wilayah
Morowali yaitu PT. IMIP dan PT. CORI di Morowali Utara.
2.5 PEMASARAN DAN INVENTORY
2.5.1 Pemasaran dan Inventory
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama pada tahun 2019 belum
melakukan pemasaran dan pada tahun 2020 pemasaran akan
direncanakan dengan tujuan domestik sebesar 2.000,000 Ton,
rencana dan realisasi tahun 2019 dan rencana tahun 2020 untuk
kegiatan pemasaran dan inventory dijelaskan pada tabel berikut :
Page 45
Tabel 2.25 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penjualan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
RENCANA TAHUN 2019 (TON) REALISASI TAHUN 2019 (TON) RENCANA TAHUN 2020 (TON)
NO BULAN KADAR KADAR KADAR KADAR
EKSPOR DOMESTIC PEMBELI EKSPOR DOMESTIC PEMBELI EKSPOR DOMESTIC PEMBELI
/KUALITAS /KUALITAS /KUALITAS /KUALITAS
1 Januari 0 0 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
2 Perbuari 0 0 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
3 Maret 0 0 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
4 April 0 0 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 185.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
5 Mei 0 0 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
6 Juni 0 0 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
7 Juli 0 0 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 165.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
8 Agustus 0 0,00 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
9 September 115.200 38.400 1,65 PT. SMI 0 0 0 0 0 0 175.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
10 Oktober 115.200 38.400 1,65 PT. SMI 0 0 0 0 0 0 175.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
11 November 115.200 38.400 1,65 PT. SMI 0 0 0 0 0 0 175.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
12 Desember 116.716 228.905 1,65 PT. SMI 0 0 0 0 0 0 160.000 1,68 PT. SMI & PT. COR
TOTAL 462.316 344.105 2.000.000
Page 46
2.5.2 Biaya Pemasaran dan Inventory
Biaya pemasaran terdiri dari biaya barging dan transhipment,
pada tahun 2019 direncanakan pemasaran sebesar Rp.
4.032.104.000,- namun tidak ada realisasi karena belum ada
produksi dan pada tahun 2020 direncanakan biaya pemasaran
sebesar Rp. 16.000.000.000. Untuk lebih jelasnya dapat dilihat pada
tabel berikut:
Tabel 2.27 : Rencana dan Realisasi Biaya Kegiatan Pemasaran Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
REALISASI TAHUN
RENCANA TAHUN 2019 RENCANA TAHUN 2020
2019
NO BULAN SATUAN
Biaya Biaya TOTAL Biaya
Tonase TOTAL BIAYA Tonase Tonase TOTAL BIAYA
satuan satuan BIAYA satuan
1 Januari Ton 0 0 0 0 0 0 95.000 8.000 760.000.000

2 Februari Ton 0 0 0 0 0 0 180.000 8.000 1.440.000.000
3 Maret Ton 0 0 0 0 0 0 185.000 8.000 1.480.000.000
4 April Ton 0 0 0 0 0 0 185.000 8.000 1.480.000.000
5 Mei Ton 0 0 0 0 0 0 165.000 8.000 1.320.000.000
6 Juni Ton 0 0 0 0 0 0 165.000 8.000 1.320.000.000
7 Juli Ton 0 5.000 0 0 0 0 165.000 8.000 1.320.000.000
8 Agustus Ton 0 5.000 0 0 0 0 175.000 8.000 1.400.000.000
9 September Ton 153.600 5.000 768.000.000 0 0 0 175.000 8.000 1.400.000.000
10 Oktober Ton 153.600 5.000 768.000.000 0 0 0 175.000 8.000 1.400.000.000
11 November Ton 153.600 5.000 768.000.000 0 0 0 175.000 8.000 1.400.000.000
12 Desember Ton 345.621 5.000 1.728.104.000 0 0 0 160.000 8.000 1.280.000.000
JUMLAH 806.421 30.000 4.032.104.000 0 0 0 2.000.000 96.000 16.000.000.000
Page 47
2.6 PERLINDUNGAN LINGKUNGAN
Kesadaran perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup sejalan
dengan regulasi Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup yang
mewajibkan setiap orang untuk memelihara kelestarian fungsi lingkungan
hidup dan mencegah serta menanggulangi pencemaran dan kerusakan
lingkungan hidup.
2.7.1 Kegiatan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan (Kegiatan
Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan, Pembukaan dan
Reklamasi Lahan)
Pengelolaan lingkungan yang akan dibahas pada sub bab ini
adalah upaya yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan untuk mengelola
lingkungan yang terdampak akibat kegiatan pertambangan. Pada
tahun 2019 kegiatan pengelolaan lingkungan belum dilakukan baik
dalam wilayah IUP maupun dalam project area PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama.
Pada tahun 2020 PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama akan
memprogramkan kegiatan pengelolaan lingkungan yang meliputi
kegiatan Pembuatan perawatan sedimen pond dan pemeliharaan
saluran drainase run off pada area stockpile, pengelolaan limbah B3
di workshop dimana dalam hal pengumpulan limbah B3 akan bekerja
sama dengan pengumpul limbah B3 yang berizin, pembuatan
drainase untuk penanggulangan run off pada lokasi tapak tambang,
serta pelaksanaan reklamasi lokasi bekas tambang berupa penataan
Page 48
lahan, pengisian kembali dan penebaran tanah pucuk dan kegiatan
revegetasi pada lokasi yang sudah ditambang.
Realisasi pembukaan lahan pada tahun 2019 yaitu bukaan
lahan untuk tambang 0 Ha, Timbunan tanah penutup 0 Ha dan tanah
pucuk 0 Ha, sedimen pond 0.24 Ha, Jalan Tambang 14,8 Ha serta
beberapa infrastruktur lainnya.
Pada tahun 2020 direncanakan kegiatan pembukaan lahan
untuk kegiatan penambangan seluas 16,67 Ha dan waste Dump 3
Ha. Bukaan tambang di blok GGU. Berikut tabel penggunaan lahan
tambang tahun 2019 :
Page 49
Tabel 2.29 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Lahan untuk Kegiatan Pertambangan Tahun 2019
Kumulatif Bukaan Rencana Realisasi Kumulatif
Lahan s.d. tahun Tahun Tahun 2019 Bukaan Lahan
Deskripsi
2018 2019 s.d. Tahun 2019
1 2 3 4 5
1. Lahan untuk tambang (ha)
a. Tambang aktif (ha) 0 8,26 0,00 0
b. Tambang selesai (ha) 0 0 0 0
2. Timbunan OB/batuan penutup di bekas tambang (backfilling ) (ha)
a. Backfilling aktif 0 0 0 0
b. Backfilling selesai 0 0 0 0
3. Timbunan OB/batuan penutup di luar tambang (ha)
a. Timbunan aktif (ha) 0 0 0 0
b. Timbunan selesai (ha) 0 0 0 0
4. Timbunan tanah pucuk (ha) 0 0 0 0
5. Jalan tambang (ha) 0 0 14,8 14,8
6. Kolam sedimen/kendali erosi (ha) 0 0 0,24 0,24
7. Fasilitas penunjang (m²) 0 0 0 0
- Basecamp 0 0 1 1
- Workshop 0 0 0,02 0,02
- Pos Security 0 0 0,01 0,01
- Gudang Genset 0 0 0,01 0,01
- Laboratorium 0 0 0 0
Page 50
Tabel 2.30 : Rencana dan Realisasi Pembukaan Lahan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Pembukaan Lahan Tahun 2020
Realisasi Pembukaan Lahan Tahun 2019 Rencana Bukaan Rencana Pembukaan Lahan
Rencana Bukaan Lahan (ha) Tahun 2020 (ha)
Total Pembukaan Lahan Dalam
Dalam Dokumen
Uraian Pembukaan Lahan Lahan Tahun 2019 Dokumen Rencana Total (ha)
Rencana Reklamasi
Tri. I Tri. II Tri. III Tri. IV (ha) Reklamasi Tahun Tri. I Tri. II Tri. III Tri. IV
Tahun 2019
2020
1 2 3 4 5 6 (7) = (3+4+5+6) 8 9 10 11 12 (13)=(9+10+11+12)

1 Lahan untuk Tambang (ha) 2,50 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4,00 4 4,67 16,67
2 Timbunan Overburden/batuan
1,50 0 0 0 0 0 1,50 1,5 0 3,00
penutup di luar tambang(ha)
3 Timbunan Tanah Pucuk (ha) 0,50 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,00 0 0 1,00
4 Jalan Tambang (ha) 19,70 0 0 0,8 14 14,8 0 0,00 0 0 0,00
5 Kolam Sedimen/Kendali Erosi
3,50 0 0 0 0,24 0,24 0 0,21 0,21 0 0,42
(ha)
6 Fasilitas Penunjang (m²)
- Basecamp 1,50 0 0 0 1 1 0 1,75 0 0 1,75
- Workshop 0,50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,50 0 0 0,50
- Pos Security 0,00 0 0 0 0,01 0,01 0 0,00 0 0 0,00
- Gudang Genset 0,00 0 0 0 0,01 0,01 0 0,00 0 0 0,00
- Laboratorium 0,01 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,02 0 0 1,02
Total 29,72 0 0 0,8 15,26 16,06 4 9,99 5,71 4,67 24,37
Page 51
Page 52
2.7.2 Pemantauan Lingkungan
Pada tahun 2020 direncanakan pengadaan peralatan
pemantauan pada setiap semester dan akan segera dilakukan
kegiatan pemantauan air, udara, tanah dan kegiatan pemantauan
lainnya sesuai yang telah direncanakan.
2.7.3 Biaya Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan
Pada tahun 2019 belum direncanakan kegiatan pengelolaan
dan pemantauan lingkungan seperti penataan lahan, revegetasi,
pengelolaan kualitas lingkungan kerja, pengelolaan limbah serta
berbagai macam kegiatan pemantauan dengan rencana biaya
sebesar Rp. 1.211.788.500. Untuk lebih jelasnya dapat dilihat pada
tabel berikut:
Page 53
Tabel 2.32 : Rencana dan Realisasi Biaya Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Biaya Tahun 2020
R e nc a na da n R e a lis a s i Ta hun 2019 (IDR ) R e nc a na Ta hun 2020 (IDR )
Ura ia n B ia ya P e nge lo la a n da n P e m a nta ua n Lingkunga n Tri. I Tri. II Tri. III Tri. IV TOTAL
Tri. I Tri. II Tri. III Tri. IV TOTAL
R e nc a na R e a lis a s i R e nc a na R e a lis a s i R e nc a na R e a lis a s i R e nc a na R e a lis a s i R e nc a na R e a lis a s i
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
1 Biaya P engelolaan Lingkungan

1) P embongkaran fasilitas tambang (jika ada) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2) P enataan lahan - - - - - - - - - - - - - 517.205.000 517.205.000
3) P enghijauan, meliputi: - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a. P ersemaian - - - - - - - - - - - - - 90.155.000 90.155.000
b. P enanaman - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.805.700 27.805.700
c. P emeliharaan (pemupukan,penyiangan,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - 180.025.300 180.025.300
pengapuran tanah, penyulaman, dll)
d. P embelian cover crop - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.117.500 7.117.500
4) P engelolaan Kualitas Lingkungan -
a. Kualitas Air - - - - - - - - - - 660.000 660.000 660.000 660.000 2.640.000
- Air Laut - - - - - - - - - - 180.000 180.000 180.000 180.000 720.000
- Air P ermukaan - - - - - - - - - - 360.000 360.000 360.000 360.000 1.440.000
- Air T anah - - - - - - - - - - 120.000 120.000 120.000 120.000 480.000
b. Kualitas Udara - - - - - - - - - - 6.300.000 6.300.000 6.300.000 6.300.000 25.200.000
c. Kualitas T anah - - - - - - - - - - 3.500.000 3.500.000 3.500.000 3.500.000 14.000.000
d. P encegahan dan penanggulangan air
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
asam tambang
e. Keanekaragaman Hayati - - - - - - - - - - 2.500.000 2.500.000 2.500.000 2.500.000 10.000.000
5) P ekerjaan sipil seperti pembuatan
dam/kolam pengendap dan peraw atan kolam 15.000.000 15.000.000 15.000.000 15.000.000 60.000.000
pengendap
6) P engelolaan Limbah B3 - - - - - - - - - - 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 40.000.000
7) Biaya lainnya (Disesuaikan dengan kegiatan
- - - - - - - - - - -
pengelolaan lingkungan yang ada)
2 Biaya P emantauan Lingkungan -
a. P engadaan peralatan pantau - - - - - - - - - - 25.000.000 25.000.000 25.000.000 - 75.000.000
b. P engambilan sampel/contoh - - - - - - - - - - 5.000.000 5.000.000 5.000.000 5.000.000 20.000.000
c. Analisis laboratorium - - - - - - - - - - 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 40.000.000
d. P elaksana pemantauan (upah tenaga kerja) - - - - - - - - - - 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 40.000.000
e. Biaya lainnya (Flora Fauna, tanah,plankton
- - - - - - - - - - 15.000.000 15.000.000 15.000.000 15.000.000 60.000.000
dan bentos,sosek)
T OT AL BIAYA P ENGELOLAAN DAN
- - - - - - - - - - 103.620.000 103.620.000 103.620.000 900.928.500 1.211.788.500
P EMANT AUAN LINGKUNGAN
Page 54
2.7 KESELAMATAN PERTAMBANGAN
2.7.1 Statistik Keselamatan Pertambangan
Dalam upaya mengukur tingkat keberhasilan dalam
pengelolaan keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja yang diterapkan
oleh perusahaan maka perlu diketahui jumlah dan kekerapan dan
keparahan kecelakaan yang terjadi dalam periode 1 tahun dan
termuat dalam statistik kecelakaan. Berikut statistic kecelakaan di
areal tambang periode 2019 :
Tabel 2.33 : Frekuensi Kecelakaan
Tingkat Kecelakaan
Bulan Komulatif
Ringan Berat Mati
Januari 0 0 0 0
Februari 0 0 0 0
Maret 0 0 0 0
April 0 0 0 0
Mei 0 0 0 0
Juni 0 0 0 0
Juli 0 0 0 0
Agustus 0 0 0 0
September 0 0 0 0
Oktober 0 0 0 0
November 0 0 0 0
Desember 0 0 0 0
Jumlah 0 0 0 0
Pada tahun 2019 dengan pelaksanaan kegiatan pembangunan sarana
dan prasarana penunjang yang dilakukan tersebut tidak ada kecelakaan
yang terjadi.
Page 55
2.7.2 Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Bahan Peledak Tahun
2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Dalam rencana kegiatan penambangan PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama tidak ada rencana penggunaan bahan peledak.
2.7.3 Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Cair Tahun
2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Realisasi penggunaan bahan bakar cair pada tahun 2019
belum ada sebagaimana perencanaan penggunaan BBM yang juga
belum ada karena belum ada kegiatan penambangan dan kegiatan
penunjang lainnya. Pada tahun 2020 terdiri dari penggunaan solar,
Bensin dan Minyak Pelumas dengan volume masing-masing dapat
dilihat pada tabel berikut :
Page 56
Tabel 2.34 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Cair Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Rencana Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Cair Tahun 2019
Jumlah (liter) Biaya (IDR)
Bahan Bahan
Solar/ Bensin/ Minyak
Bulan Biofue Bakar Solar/ Fuel Bensin/ Minyak Biofue Bakar
Fuel Gasolin Peluma Avtur Avtur
l Cair Diesel Gasoline Pelumas l Cair
Diesel e s
lainnya lainnya
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Januari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Februari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maret 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
April 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mei 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Agustus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
September 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oktober 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
November 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Desember 1,000 0 250 0 0 0 12,000,000 0 8,750,000 0 0 0
Total 1,000 0 250 0 0 0 12,000,000 0 8,750,000 0 0 0
Realisasi Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Cair Tahun 2019

Bahan Bahan
Diesel e s
lainnya lainnya
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Januari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Februari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maret 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
April 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mei 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Agustus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
September 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oktober 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
November 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Desember 877 0 187 0 0 0 10,524,000 0 6,545,000 0 0 0
Total 877 0 187 0 0 0 10,524,000 0 6,545,000 0 0 0
Rencana Penggunaan Bahan Bakar Cair Tahun 2020

Bahan Bahan
Diesel e s
lainnya lainnya
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Januari 200,000 1,000 20,000 2,400,000,000 9,000,000 700,000,000
Februari 220,000 1,100 22,000 2,640,000,000 9,900,000 770,000,000
Maret 230,000 1,150 23,000 2,760,000,000 10,350,000 805,000,000
April 230,000 11,500 23,000 2,760,000,000 103,500,000 805,000,000
Mei 240,000 12,000 24,000 2,880,000,000 108,000,000 840,000,000
Juni 240,000 12,000 24,000 2,880,000,000 108,000,000 840,000,000
Juli 240,000 1,200 24,000 2,880,000,000 10,800,000 840,000,000
Agustus 240,000 1,200 24,000 2,880,000,000 10,800,000 840,000,000
September 240,000 1,200 24,000 2,880,000,000 10,800,000 840,000,000
Oktober 240,000 1,200 24,000 2,880,000,000 10,800,000 840,000,000
November 240,000 1,200 24,000 2,880,000,000 10,800,000 840,000,000
Desember 240,000 1,200 24,000 2,880,000,000 10,800,000 840,000,000
Total 2,800,000 19,200 168,000 33,600,000,000 172,800,000 5,880,000,000
Page 57
2.7.4 Rencana Pembangunan Tempat Penimbunan Bahan Bakar Cair

Tahun 2020
Pada tahun 2020 PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama merencanakan
akan membangun tempat penimbunan BBC sebanyak 4 unit masing-
masing kapasitas 10 + 10 + 10 + 6.
Tabel 2.35 : Rencana Pembangunan Tempat Penimbunan Bahan Bakar Cair Tahun 2020
Data Pembangunan Tempat
No. Keterangan
Penimbunan BBC
a. Nomor Tangki : 1, 2, 3 & 4
b. Jenis Bahan Bakar Cair : Solar
c. Jumlah Tangki : 4, masing-masing 10 + 10 + 10 + 6
d. Kapasitas Tangki (liter) : 36.000
e. Lokasi:
1) Area : Kompleks Workshop
2) Desa/Kelurahan : Ganda-Ganda
3) Kecamatan : Petasia
4) Kabupaten : Morowali Utara
5) Provinsi : Sulawesi Tengah
No. Derajat Menit Detik BT Derajat Menit Detik LU/LS
121 15 39.15 BT -1 55 49.12 LS
121 15 39.34 BT -1 55 49.27 LS
1
1 121 15 39.10 BT -1 55 49.55 LS
121 15 38.92 BT -1 55 49.39 LS
121 15 39.38 BT -1 55 49.31 LS
121 15 39.56 BT -1 55 49.47 LS
2
121 15 39.32 BT -1 55 49.74 LS
f. Koordinat Lokasi 121 15 39.14 BT -1 55 49.58 LS
121 15 39.45 BT -1 55 48.77 LS
121 15 39.63 BT -1 55 48.93 LS
3
121 15 39.39 BT -1 55 49.21 LS
121 15 39.21 BT -1 55 49.05 LS
121 15 39.67 BT -1 55 48.96 LS
121 15 39.86 BT -1 55 49.12 LS
4
121 15 39.62 BT -1 55 49.39 LS
121 15 39.43 BT -1 55 49.23 LS
2.7.5 Rencana Pengujian Kelayakan Peralatan dan/atau Instalasi

Tahun 2020
Pada tahun 2020 direncanakan pengujian kelayakan
penggunaan instalasi listrik di lokasi Basecamp dan workshop
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama.
Page 58
2.7.6 Rencana Pengoperasian Kapal Keruk/Isap Tahun 2020
Dalam rencana kegiatan penambangan PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama tidak ada rencana penggunaan kapal keruk/kapal isap.
2.7.7 Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Bahan Berbahaya dan
Beracun Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Penggunaan bahan berbahaya dan beracun berasal dari sisa
penggunaan pelumas oli dan gemuk. Berikut rencana dan realisasi
penggunaan bahan berbahaya dan beracun:

Tabel 2.37 : Rencana Penggunaan Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Persediaan Tahun 2019 Jumlah Rencana
Jenis Bahan
Sisa Penggunaan Penggunaan Keterangan
No. Berbahaya Dan Penerimaan Jumlah
Persediaan Tahun 2019 Tahun 2020
Beracun
(Liter/Kg) (Liter/Kg) (Liter/Kg) (Liter/Kg) (Liter/Kg)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
sisa oli bekas yang
1 Gemuk (Grease) 600 600 300 1200
telah digunakan akan
disimpan pada
2 Oli 30000 30000 700 120,000 gudang penyimpanan
B3
2.7.8 Rencana dan Realisasi Program dan Biaya Keselamatan
pertambangan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Pada setiap kegiatan penambangan harus diperhatikan secara
rinci analisis dan tindakan kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja.
Program keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) di PT. Sumber
Swarna Pratama akan dilaksanakan secara berkesinambungan.
Berikut program-program K3 yang dilakukan oleh PT. Sumber
Swarna Pratama adalah sebagai berikut:
Page 59
1. Inspeksi K3
Adalah suatu program yang dirancang untuk mengidentifikasi
dan memperbaiki penyimpangan atau kondisi yang tidak
standar/berbahaya sehingga dapat mencegah sebelum
terjadinya kecelakaan
2. Pertemuan K3 dan Safety Talk
Salah satu media untuk membahas permasalahan K3
dilapangan dan memberikan informasi kepada semua karyawan
yang berhubungan dengan K3, sehingga dapat menambah
pengetahuan, meningkatkan kesadaran, dan partisipasi secara
konsisten.
3. Pelatihan K3
Program yang dilaksanakan untuk memberikan pelatihan
kompetensi dibidang K3 sehingga karyawan mengerti dan
mempunyai kesadaran, pengetahuan dan keterampilan yang
memadai dibidang K3.
4. Komunikasi dan Publikasi K3L
Membuat berbagai macam sarana komunikasi dan publikasi K3
yang diharapkan dapat menumbuhkan dan meningkatkan
kesadaran karyawan terhadap kesehatan, keselamatan kerja
dan lingkungan, antara lain melalui spanduk, sticker, papan
billboard, dsb.
5. Pemeriksaan & Perawatan Harian (P2H)
Suatu program yang diwajibkan bagi operator dan driver untuk
melakukan pemeriksaan secara rutin sebelum mengoperasikan
Page 60
kendaraan dan peralatan (unit alat berat) agar kegagalan yang
tidak direncanakan dapat dicegah sehingga semua kerusakan
yang berbahaya dapat diidentifikasi sebelum menimbulkan
insiden atau kerugian.
6. Pemeriksaan Kesehatan Bagi Karyawan Baru
Pemeriksaan kesehatan akan dilakukan setiap penerimaan
karyawan baru untuk mendiagnosa penyakit setiap calon
karyawan apakah layak atau tidak untuk menjadi karyawan
7. Standart Operational Prosedur (SOP) dan Job Analysis
(JSA)
Mengembangkan pembuatan JSA untuk setiap aktivitas kerja
yang dilaksanakan pada divisi tambang. JSA digunakan untuk
memastikan semua karyawan memahami tugas pekerjaannya
dengan baik, langkah-langkah kerja, bahaya-bahaya yang bisa
timbul dan tindakan pencegahan yang harus dilakukan untuk
upaya pengendalian bahaya.
8. Pencegahan Kebakaran
Program penyediaan system, fasilitas dan perawatan peralatan
perlindungan kebakaran untuk mengurangi tingkat resiko
insiden kebakaran yang mungkin terjadi disemua area
kerja/site, misalnya APAR (Alat Pemadam Api Ringan).
9. Alat Pelindung Diri (APD)
Menyediakan alat pelindung diri secara gratis kepada karyawan
sesuai persyaratan pekerjaan. APD diberikan untuk
Page 61
memberikan perlindungan maksimal dalam mengurangi
keparahan (fatality) dari dampak cedera yang mungkin terjadi.
Salah satu aktivitas yang potensi resikonya sangat tinggi adalah
aktivitas bekerja pada lereng tambang. Faktor kesehatan dan
keselamatan kerja yang dominan berhubungan dengan aktivitas
pada lereng tambang adalah kemantapan lereng tambang.
10. Pelaporan
Pelaporan keselamatan pertambangan akan dilakukan setiap
bulan sekali guna mengevaluasi pelaksanaan keselamatan
pertambangan
11. Kajian Teknis Penambangan
Kajian teknis pertambangan yang dilakukan meliputi
pengumpulan data berkala untuk mengevaluasi pelaksanaan
teknis pertambangan yang telah dilakukan sebelumnya untuk
menganalisis benefit dan cost serta resiko dari kegiatan
penambangan yang dilakukan yang akan menghasilkan
rekomendasi demi keberlangsungan kegiatan pertambangan.
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
2.8 STANDARISASI DAN USAHA JASA PERTAMBANGAN
2.8.1 Standarisasi
Kegiatan pertambangan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama tetap
mengacu kepada peraturan-peraturan dan standar yang telah di
tetapkan dan akan menjadi acuan dalam melaksanakan kegiatan
pertambangan. Salah satunya adalah mengacu pada Standar
Nasional Indonesia (SNI) dalam sistem pelaporan sumberdaya dan
cadangan dan standar-standar lainnya.
Selain itu dalam hal standar kompetensi seperti Pengawas
Operasional dan pengawas K3 dan Lingkungan yang telah
memenuhi persyaratan untuk kompetensi tertentu. Berikut rencana
penerapan standar PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama:
Page 65
2.8.2 Usaha Jasa Pertambangan
Pada kegiatan penambangan tahun 2019 PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama tidak melakukan kerja sama dengan Usaha Jasa
Pertambangan. Pada tahun 2020 akan dilakukan kerjasama dengan
pemilik IUJP seperti dijelaskan pada tabel di bawah :
Page 66
2.9 TENAGA KERJA DAN PENGEMBANGAN SUMBER DAYA
MANUSIA
2.9.1 Penggunaan Tenaga Kerja IUP/IUPK
Dalam rencana perekrutan tenaga kerja PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama akan memprioritaskan warga lingkar tambang namun tetap
mempertimbangan skill dan kemampuan dari calon tenaga kerja.
Pada tahun 2019 direncanakan tenaga kerja sebanyak 94 Orang
namun yang terralisasi sebanyak 14 orang yang seluruhnya
berstatus WNI. Pada tahun 2020 direncanakan penambahan tenaga
kerja menjadi 94 orang yang seluruhnya merupakan WNI.
Peningkatan ini karena seiring dengan meningkatnya target produksi
pada tahun 2020.
Page 67
Tabel 2.41 : Rencana dan Realisasi Penggunaan Tenaga Kerja IUP/IUPK Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
PERUSAHAAN RENCANA TAHUN 2019 REALISASI TAHUN 2019

PERUSAHAAN PEMEGANG IUP/IUPK (ORGANIK)
KUALIFIKAS
KUALIFIKASI PERIZINAN
JUMLAH TENAGA KERJA PERIZINAN TKA JUMLAH TENAGA KERJA I TENAGA
TENAGA KERJA TKA
KERJA
KLASIFIKASI
NO TKI (LATAR DAN TKI (LATAR DAN
JABATAN
JENJANG JUMLAH JENJANG
JUMLAH TKI TKA (RPTKA) NON TKA (RPTKA)
LOKAL NON LOKAL PENDIDIKAN) LOKAL TKI PENDIDIKAN
LOKAL
)
1 MANAJEMEN 2 5 7 - - - - 5 5 - - -
2 PROFESIONAL 3 3 6 - - - - 2 2 - - -
3 TEKNISI 8 4 12 - - - - 1 1 - - -
4 ADMINISTRASI 5 2 7 - - - - 2 2 - - -
5 TERAMPIL 42 42 - - - 2 2 - - -
6 TIDAK TERAMPIL 20 20 - - - 2 2 - - -
TOTAL 80 14 94 - - - 4 10 14 - - -
PERUSAHAAN RENCANA TAHUN 2020

PERUSAHAAN PEMEGANG IUP/IUPK/IUPOPK (ORGANIK)
KUALIFIKASI
JUMLAH TENAGA KERJA PERIZINAN TKA
TENAGA KERJA
KLASIFIKASI
NO TKI (LATAR DAN
JABATAN
JUMLAH TKI TKA JENJANG (RPTKA)
PENDIDIKAN)
LOKAL NON LOKAL
1 MANAJEMEN 2 5 7
2 PROFESIONAL 3 3 6
3 TEKNISI 8 4 12
4 ADMINISTRASI 5 2 7
5 TERAMPIL 42 42
6 TIDAK TERAMPIL 20 20
TOTAL 80 14 94
Page 68
2.9.2 Pelatihan Tenaga Kerja
Untuk meningkatkan kompetensi karyawan maka PT. Sumber
Swarna Pratama akan merencanakan pelatihan tenaga kerja setiap
tahunnya. Pada tahun 2020 PT Sumber Swarna Pratama
merencanakan akan meningkatkan kompetensi dan pengetahuan
karyawan melalui beberapa pelatihan seperti :
2.10 PENGEMBANGAN DAN PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT
Salah tatu tujuan dasar PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama adalah turut
serta dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat dan menumbuh kembangkan
tingkat kemandirian masyarakat maka PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
merencanakan beberapa program pemberdayaan pada tahun 2019.
Anggaran PPM Tahun 2019 belum terealisasikan, kegiatan PPM tersebut
kembali dianggarkan pada tahun 2020 adalah sebesar Rp. 535,000,000.
Page 69
Dalam rangka penerapan program Pengembangan dan
Pemberdayaan Masyarakat maka akan segera dulakukan penyusunan
dokumen induk yang akan menjadi acuan dalam setiap pelaksanaan
program Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Nantinya.
Page 70
2.11 PEMANFAATAN PRODUK DALAM NEGERI DAN BELANJA
BARANG
2.11.1 Pemanfaatan Produk Dalam Negri
Dalam rencana belanja barang keperluan pertambangan
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama selalu mengedepankan produk dalam
negri selama barang tersebut tersedia seperti sparepart peralatan,
bahan konsumsi, kebutuhan perkantoran serta kebutuhan lain yang
diperlukan.
2.11.2 Belanja Barang
Dalam pembelanjaan barang PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
pada tahun 2019 seluruhnya berasal dari belanja dalam negeri,
begitu juga rencana belanja barang pada tahun 2020 direncanakan
seluruhnya berasal dari belanja dalam negeri.
Page 71
Tabel 2.44 : Rencana dan Realisasi Belanja Barang dan Peralatan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
Rencana Tahun 2019 Realisasi Tahun 2019 Prakiraan Realisasi Tahun 2019 Rencana Tahun 2020
KATEGORI Domestik Impor Total Domestik Impor Total Domestik Impor Total Domestik Impor Total
(RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP) (RP)
A Heavy Equipment 3,750,000,000 3,750,000,000 2,662,500,000 2,662,500,000 3,562,500,000 3,562,500,000 6,562,500,000 6,562,500,000
B Land Transport Equipment 800,000,000 800,000,000 760,000,000 760,000,000 1,400,000,000 1,400,000,000
C Water Transport Equipment
D Air Transport Equipment
E Communication 12,750,000 12,750,000 9,052,500 9,052,500 12,112,500 12,112,500 22,312,500 22,312,500
F Land Survey & Recoinassance 250,000,000 250,000,000 177,500,000 177,500,000 237,500,000 237,500,000 437,500,000 437,500,000
G Drilling Equipment
H Sampling & Lab 125,000,000 125,000,000 88,750,000 88,750,000 118,750,000 118,750,000 218,750,000 218,750,000
I Repair & Maintenance 300,000,000 300,000,000 213,000,000 213,000,000 285,000,000 285,000,000 525,000,000 525,000,000
J Building Materials 200,000,000 200,000,000 142,000,000 142,000,000 190,000,000 190,000,000 350,000,000 350,000,000
K Utilities, Furniture & Appliances 56,000,000 56,000,000 39,760,000 39,760,000 53,200,000 53,200,000 98,000,000 98,000,000
L Consumables: Fuel 12,000,000 12,000,000 780 780 11,400,000 11,400,000 2,488,889 2,488,889
M Consumables: Food 1,295,750,000 1,295,750,000 1,166,175,000 1,166,175,000 1,230,962,500 1,230,962,500 2,267,562,500 2,267,562,500
N Miscellaneous
O Medical: Healthy & Safety 35,000,000 35,000,000 24,850,000 24,850,000 33,250,000 33,250,000 61,250,000 61,250,000
P Recreation Facility
Q Power Station 650,000,000 650,000,000 461,500,000 461,500,000 617,500,000 617,500,000 1,137,500,000 1,137,500,000
R Processing Plant
S School & Training
T Environmental 75,000,000 75,000,000 53,250,000 53,250,000 71,250,000 71,250,000 131,250,000 131,250,000
TOTAL 7,561,500,000 5,038,338,280 5,038,338,280 7,183,425,000 7,183,425,000 13,214,113,889 13,214,113,889
Page 72
2.11.3 Angka Pengenal Importir
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama belum memiliki Angka
Pengenal Importir
Tabel 2.45 : Rekomendasi Penerbitan/Perubahan Aangka Pengenal Importir Produsen (API-P)
KETERANGAN Awal Perubahan (jika untuk perubahan)**

A Identitas Perusahaan
1 Nama Perusahaan
2 Alamat Kantor
3 Nomor Telepon
4 Nomor Faksimili
5 Nomor Akta Notaris/Perubahan
6 Nomor SIUP
7 Nomor TDP
8 NPWP Perusahaan
9 Nama Penanggung Jawab
10 Nomor SKDP
11 Nomor Pendaftaran/Izin BKPM
12 Kontrak Kerjasama KK/Nomor SK IUP
Terakhir
13 Jenis Kegiatan
B Identitas Pengurus/Direksi Perusahaan
1 Identitas Pengurus
2.12 KEUANGAN & REALISASI ANGGARAN BIAYA TETAP TAHUN

2019 DAN RENCANA TAHUN 2020
Realisasi anggaran biaya tetap kegiatan operasi produksi Tahun
2019 PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama dan Rencana anggaran biaya tetap
kegiatan produksi Tahun 2020 meliputi pembayaran biaya iuran tetap
tahunan IUP Operasi Produksi (land rent), iuran penjualan, biaya
operasional kantor pusat, biaya penambangan, biaya kegiatan
pemantauan lapangan dan pembuatan laporan. Uraian anggaran tersebut
akan diuraikan pada uraian di bawah ini :
Page 73
Tabel 2.46 : Rencana dan Realisasi Keuangan Tahun 2019 dan Rencana Tahun 2020
TAHUN 2019 TAHUN 2020 % PRAKIRAAN
% RENCANA TAHUN
TERHADAP
PERKIRAAN 2020 TERHADAP
KETERANGAN RENCANA REALISASI RENCANA RENCANA
REALISASI RENCANA TAHUN 2019
TAHUN 2019
1 2 3 4 5 = 3/1 6=4/1
Volume Penjualan (Ton) 600,000 - - 2,000,000 333.33
Harga Jual (Rp) 22 22
Harga Beli BBM (Rp) 11,200 11,200
Nilai Kurs (Rp/US$) 14,100 14,100
Bea Keluar
Cut Off Grade (%) 1.42 1.42
Page 74
Tabel 2.47 : Laporan Neraca Kauangan (Rp)

TAHUN 2019 TAHUN 2020
NO URAIAN PRAKIRAAN
RENCANA REALISASI RENCANA
REALISASI
NERACA
AKTIVA LANCAR
Kas dan Bank 122,312,983 35,232,575,267
Piutang Usaha 60,755,000,000
Pajak dibayar dimuka
Piutang lain-lain dan biaya
dibayar dimuka
Persediaan 55,506,000,000
Jumlah Aktiva Lancar 122,312,983 151,493,575,267
AKTIVA TIDAK LANCAR
Aktiva Tetap 6,212,969,812 31,212,969,812
Aktiva Lainnya 51,134,525,665 -
Aktiva Eksplorasi dan
Evaluasi
Beban ditangguhkan
Properti Pertambangan
Amortisasi
Depresiasi - 28,400,000,000
Jumlah Aktiva Tidak Lancar 57,347,495,477 59,612,969,812
JUMLAH AKTIVA 57,469,808,460 211,106,545,079
HUTANG DAN MODAL
Kewajiban Jangka Pendek
Hutang Bank
Hutang Akrual 24,977,700,000
Hutang afiliasi
Hutang pajak 28,603,121,333
Hutang lain-lain 22,680,000,000
Jumlah Kewajiban Jangka
- 76,260,821,333
Pendek
Kewajiban Jangka Panjang
Hutang Bank
Hutang pajak
Provisi untuk reklamasi dan
penutupan tambang
Hutang Leasing
Hutang afiliasi
Jumlah Kewajiban Jangka
- -
Panjang
Hutang lain-lain 45,360,092,132 18,613,921,304
Jumlah Kewajiban 45,360,092,132 94,874,742,637
Modal Saham
Modal Yang Disetor - 10,000,000,000
Laba ditahan 106,231,802,442
Lain-lain
Ekuitas - 116,231,802,442
JUMLAH KEWAJIBAN DAN
45,360,092,132 211,106,545,079
EKUITAS
Keterangan:
Cut off realisasi sampai dengan November tahun 2019
Page 75
Dari laporan Neraca Keuangan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama diatas
tergambar bahwa jumlah aktiva lancar untuk tahun 2019 perencanaan
sebesar Rp. 45.360.092.132 dan realisasi sama sebesar Rp. 0,
sedangkan rencana di tahun 2020 sebesar Rp. 211,106,545,079, ini
disebabkan karena belum adanya aktifitas penambangan di tahun 2019.
Page 76
Tabel 2.48 : Laporan Laba Rugi (Rp.)
% RENCANA
% PRAKIRAAN
TAHUN 2019 TAHUN 2020 TAHUN 2019
TERHADAP
NO URAIAN Satuan TERHADAP
RENCANA TAHUN
RENCANA TAHUN
2019
Analisis Analisis PRAKIRAAN Analisis Analisis 2020
Vertikal Vertikal REALISASI Vertikal Vertikal
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 = 5/1 10 = 7/1
Produksi Ton 800,000 - - - - - 2,000,000 -100% 150%
Penjualan tonase Ton 600,000 - - - - - 2,000,000 -100% 233%
Harga Jual/Ton RP 22 - - - - - 22 -100% 0%
A Penjualan 248,160,000,000 - - - - - 620,400,000,000 -100% 150%
B Royalti 12,408,000,000 - - - - - 62,040,000,000 -100% 400%
C Harga Pokok 169,078,425,333 - - - - - 392,485,092,000 -100% 132%
Penjualan 0% 0%
D Laba kotor 66,673,574,667 - - - - - 165,874,908,000 -100% 149%
E Beban Operasi: - - - - - - 0% 0%
Beban Penjualan 3,000,000,000 - - - - - 10,000,000,000 -100% 233%
Beban Umum 4,963,200,000 - - - - - 12,408,000,000 -100% 150%
Beban lain-lain 2,481,600,000 - - - - - 6,204,000,000 -100% 150%
Jumlah Beban
7,963,200,000 - - - - - 22,408,000,000 -100% 181%
Operasi
F Laba Operasi 58,710,374,667 - - - - - 143,466,908,000 -100% 144%
Pendapatan/(beban)
G - - - - - - - 0% 0%
lain-lain:
Beban bunga - - - - - - - 0% 0%
Laba Selisih Kurs - - - - - - - 0% 0%
Pendapatan bunga
- - - - - - - 0% 0%
Beban lain-lain
Rugi selisih kurs,
- - - - - - - 0% 0%
bersih
Jumlah
pendapatan/(beban) - - - - - - - 0% 0%
lain-lain
H Laba sebelum Pajak 58,710,374,667 - - - - - 143,466,908,000 -100% 144%
Biaya Pajak
14,677,593,667 - - - - - 35,866,727,000 -100% 144%
I Penghasilan
J Laba Bersih 44,032,781,000 - - - - - 107,600,181,000 -100% 144%
Penjelasan Matrik:
Cut-off realisasi sampai dengan November tahun 2019
Page 77
Tabel 2.49 : Harga Pokok Penjualan (Rp.)

NO URAIAN % PRAKIRAAN % RENCANA TAHUN 2020
TAHUN 2019 TAHUN 2020 TERHADAP RENCANA TERHADAP RENCANA
RENCANA REALISASI PERKIRAAN RENCANA
HPP 1 2 3 4 5 = 3/1 6 = 4/1
1 Biaya Kontraktor 112,000,000,000 - - 282,000,000,000 -100% 152%

2 Biaya Bahan dan Material 5,600,000,000 - - 14,100,000,000 -100% 152%
3 Biaya Bahan Bakar 10,453,333,333 - - 31,360,000,000 -100% 200%
Biaya Pemeliharaan dan
4 5,611,152,000 - - 5,611,152,000 -100% 0%
Suku Cadang
Biaya Lain-lain (Biaya
5 7,013,940,000 - - 7,013,940,000 -100% 0%
Terkait Produksi)
6 Konsultan - - - 24,000,000,000 0% 0%
Sub Total Biaya Tambang 140,678,425,333 - - 364,085,092,000 -100% 159%
Biaya Pengolahan dan
7 - - - - 0% 0%
Pemurnian
8 Depresiasi 28,400,000,000 - - 28,400,000,000 -100% 0%
9 Amortisasi - - - - 0% 0%
Sub Total 28,400,000,000 - - 28,400,000,000 -100% 0%
Total Biaya Produksi 169,078,425,333 - - 392,485,092,000 -100% 132%
10 Persediaan Awal - - - - 0% 0%
11 Persediaan Akhir - - - - 0% 0%
TOTAL HPP 169,078,425,333 - - 392,485,092,000 -100% 132%
Keterangan:
Cut off realisasi sampai dengan November tahun 2019
Page 78
Tabel 2.50 : Laporan Arus Kas (Rp.)

URAI AN PRAKI RAAN
REN CAN A REALI SASI REN CAN A
REALI SASI
Arus Kas dari Aktivitas Operasi
Laba (Rugi) Bersih tahun berjalan 58,736,510,888 - - 107,600,181,000
Penyesuaian dari Laba Bersih untuk menentukan Kas yg Diperoleh dr Operasi:
- Penyusutan 788,986,114 28,400,000,000
- Amortisasi
- Pembebanan untuk program pensiun yang melebihi pembayaran
- Lain-lain 51,134,525,665 51,134,525,665
Pengurangan penambahan Modal Kerja non kas yg berhubungan dengan
Operasi:
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Piutang Usaha
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Piutang lain-lain (60,755,000,000) (60,755,000,000)
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Persediaan (55,506,000,000) (55,506,000,000)
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Biaya dibayar di muka
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Hutang Usaha 24,977,700,000 24,977,700,000
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Hutang Pajak 28,603,121,333 28,603,121,333
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Hutang Lain-lain 22,680,000,000 22,680,000,000
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Biaya yg masih harus dibayar
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Pendapatan diterima dimuka
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Kewajiban lancar lainnnya
Arus Kas N etto digunakan untuk Aktivitas Operasi 70,659,844,000 - - 147,134,527,998
Arus Kas dari Aktivitas I nvestasi
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Aktiva Tetap (25,000,000,000) (25,000,000,000)
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Aktiva lain-lain
Arus Kas N etto yang digunakan untuk aktivitas I nvestasi (25,000,000,000) - - (25,000,000,000)
Arus Kas dari Aktivitas Pendanaan
- Pengurangan (Penambahan) Deposito
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Hutang Pemegang Saham
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Hutang Afiliasi
- Penambahan (Pengurangan) Hutang lain-lainn (26,746,170,828) (26,746,170,828)
- Pembayaran Deviden
- Koreksi ke Laba ditahan
- Tambahan Modal Disetor
Arus Kas N etto Yang Digunakan Untuk Aktivitas Pendanaan (26,746,170,828) - - (26,746,170,828)
KEN AI KAN ATAU PEN URUN AN N ETTO KAS DAN BAN K 18,913,673,172 95,388,357,170
KAS DAN BAN K AWAL TAHUN 122,312,983 122,312,983
KAS DAN BAN K AKHI R TAHUN 19,035,986,155 - - 95,510,670,153
Keterangan:
1. Keterangan/pos-pos rekening disesuaikan dengan kondisi perusahan
2. Cut-off realisasi sampai dengan November tahun 2019
Page 79
Tabel 2.51 : P enerimaan Negara M ineral Logam (Rp.)

TAHUN 2019 TAHUN 2020 % PRAKIRAAN % RENCANA
TERHADAP TAHUN 2020
NO URAIAN PRAKIRAAN
RENCANA REALISASI RENCANA RENCANA THDP RENCANA
REALISASI
PENERIMAAN NEGARA 1 2 3 4 5 = 3/1 6 = 4/1
a PAJAK
PPH Pasal 21 96,000,000 96,000,000 -100% 0%
PPH Pasal 22 8,830,500,000 8,830,500,000 -100% 0%
PPH Pasal 23/26 5,143,556,000 5,143,556,000 -100% 0%
PPH Pasal 25 - - 0% 0%
PPH Pasal 29 2,497,770,000 2,497,770,000 -100% 0%
PPN Masukan 2,943,500,000 2,943,500,000 -100% 0%
PPN Keluaran 5,887,000,000 5,887,000,000 -100% 0%
Pajak-pajak daerah 1,500,000,000 1,500,000,000 -100% 0%
Lumpsum Payment - - 0% 0%
Jumlah Pajak 26,898,326,000 26,898,326,000 -100% 0%
b NON PAJAK 0% 0%
Dead Rent 147,896,000 158,460,000 -100% 7%
Royalti 15,119,995,275 62,040,000,000 -100% 310%
SPW3D - - 0% 0%
Advance Payment - - 0% 0%
BBN - - 0% 0%
Jumlah Non Pajak 15,267,891,275 62,198,460,000 -100% 307%
JUMLAH PENERIMAAN
42,166,217,275 89,096,786,000 -100% 111%
NEGARA
LAPORAN KEUANGAN LAINNYA

% PRAKIRAAN % RENCANA
TERHADAP TAHUN 2020 THDP
NO URAIAN
PRAKIRAAN RENCANA RENCANA TAHUN
REALISASI TAHUN 2019 2019
1 Inve stasi 8,678,847,254 312,400,000,000 -100% 3500%
2 De pre si asi 788,986,114 28,400,000,000 -100% 3500%
3 Amorti sasi 0 0 0% 0%
4 Bi aya Ke se lamatan Pe rtambangan 441,250,000 480,000,000 -100% 9%
5 Bi aya Pe nanganan li ngkungan 237,570,000 1,211,788,500 -100% 410%
6 Bi aya Pe nge mbangan Masyarakat 535,000,000 535,000,000 -100% 0%
Keterangan:
Cut-of f realisasi sampai dengan November tahun 2019
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
TABEL 2.55 : Detail Pinjaman
Dalam
Luar Negeri
No. Pinjaman Negeri Keterangan
(Penjelasan)
(Penjelasan)
Maksud dan Hanya untuk
Tujuan operasional dan
1 pengembangan
kegiatan
pertambangan
Bank/Pihak lain
2 Sumber Penjelasan asal
pemberi pinjaman
Menyampaikan jenis
Jenis dan dan mekanisme
3
Mekanisme penyelesaian
pinjaman
- Pinjaman dari
bank sesuai bunga
bank
- Pinjaman dari
4 Besar Bunga
Afiliasi/Pihak lain
harus dibawah
bunga Bank
Sesuai perjanjian dan

5 Jangka Waktu tidak melebihi jangka
waktu IUP dan IUPK
Rencana produksi
Proyeksi jangka sesuai FS dan
panjang terkait simulasi pengaruh
6 terhadap arus kas
operasi dan
finansial perusahaan
(dilampirkan)
Surat Pernyataan Surat pernyataan

tidak menjaminkan
IUP atau IUPK
dan/atau komoditas
tambangnya
7 Surat pernyataan
bahwa penyelasaian
menjadi tanggung
jawab perusahaan
dan menyampaikan
kontrak perjanjian
pinjaman
Page 84
BAB III
RENCANA STRATEGIS LIMA TAHUN
3.1 KEGIATAN EKSPLORASI
PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama memiliki luas area sebesar 2.641 Ha
berdasarkan Keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor:
540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011. Selanjutnya perubahan kesatu atas
keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor : 540.3/ SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011
tentang Persetujuan Penyesuaian Kuasa Pertambangan Eksploitasi
menjadi Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber
Swarna Pratama, sesuai Keputusan Gubernur Sulawesi Tengah Nomor :
540/456/IUP-PR/DPMPTSP/2019 Tanggal 19 September 2019 tentang
Perubahan Komposisi Perubahan saham dan susunan direksi PT. Sumber
Swarna Pratama. Pada tahun 2010-2011 telah dilakukan kegiatan
eksplorasi diseluruh wilayah IUP yang berada diluar kawasan hutan
dengan jarak spasi bor yang bervariasi antara 50 m – 200 m. Pemboran
direncanakan sebanyak 300 titik dengan kedalaman rata-rata 30 meter,
sedangkan tespit yang direncanakan sebanyak 12 titik.
3.2 PRODUKSI
Pada rencana penambangan 5 tahun kegiatan penambangan masih
akan dilakukan dengan rencana produksi 2.000.000 Ton tahun 2020
dengan luas bukaan rata-rata pertahun yaitu 16,67 Ha. Kadar rata-rata
Nikel ore yang ditargetkan yaitu 1.68% – 1.85 % dengan COG terendah
yaitu 1.42 %.
Page 85
Dengan melihat besaran pasaran saat ini dengan kebutuhan pabrik
dimana saat ini kebutuhan pabrik masih mengambil kadar 1,68% dan
berdasarkan hasil eksplorasi cadangan terbukti yang memiliki kadar
rendah yaitu 1,42%. Sebab itu kadar dengan COG Terendah yaitu kadar
1,42% diblending dengan kadar >1,85% sehingga nantinya diperoleh
kadar rata-rata 1,68%.
3.3 PEMASARAN
Saat ini PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama melakukan penjualan pada
perusahaan yang melakukan pengolahan (smelter) yang saat ini sudah
bekerjasama dengan managemen PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama yaitu
PT. SMI, PT. COR dan akan diekspor apabila mendapatkan kuota ekspor
dari pemerintah.
3.4 TENAGA KERJA
Atas dasar efektifitas dan efisiensi dalam hal ketenagakerjaan,
maka dapat dibangun suatu struktur organisasi dengan konsep
mempertimbangkan aspek-aspek kebutuhan dasar dari setiap bagian
yang ada, bagian-bagian yang akan dibentuk sebagai berikut:
1. Bagian Teknik dan Pengembangan.
Dipimpin oleh seorang manager, dengan cakupan kerja yaitu
memberikan gambaran tentang arah penambangan,
menghitung volume waste dan ore yang telah dan akan di
produksi, merencanakan lokasi wilayah baru untuk target
produksi berikutnya.
Page 86
2. Bagian K3 dan Lingkungan Hidup.
memberikan gambaran tentang arah penambangan,
menghitung volume waste dan ore yang telah dan akan di
produksi, merencanakan lokasi wilayah baru untuk target
produksi berikutnya.
3. Bagian Produksi.
mengatur dan melaksanakan proses penambangan, dengan
kontrol biaya produksi yang telah dihitung, sesuai dengan target
pengapalan ore, dan juga pola disposal area yang telah diatur,
dengan mengutamakan K3.
4. Bagian Quality Control.
mengatur dan menjaga kualitas dari ore yang telah diproduksi,
sehingga saat pengapalan kualitas ore tetap terjaga sesuai
dengan target produksi pengapalan.
5. Bagian Maintenance.
menjaga dan merawat seluruh aset yang ada baik berupa
bangunan, alat berat, kelistrikan, dump truck, dan lain-lain.
6. Bagian Human Resources Development (HRD).
mengatur seluruh karyawan dan pekerja terkait dengan cuti,
makan, asuransi, dan sistem penggajian. Selain itu juga
Page 87
mengatur untuk pola pengembangan profesi dan kepribadian
dalam hal kursus-kursus dan sebagainya, juga menjaga
hubungan antara perusahaan dangan masyarakat sekitar dan
pemerintah setempat.
7. Bagian Logistic dan Keuangan
Dipimpin oleh seorang manager, dengan cakupan. kerja yaitu
mengatur aliran dana keluar dengan control dari budget yang
sudah direncanakan dan memenuhi kebutuhan logistic di site,
baik berupa sparepart, bahan makanan, dan kebutuhan lainnya.
Dalam rekruitmen karyawan PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama akan
memprioritaskan masya rakat lokal sebelum menerima pekerja
di luar lingkar tambang dengan tetap memperhatikan kualifikasi
karyawan tersebut.
Jumlah tenaga kerja yang diperlukan untuk mendukung oprasi
penambangan diseduaikan dengan rencana penambangan dengan
mempertimbangkan target produksi dan kebutuhan alat berat,
sehingga jumlah personil/karyawan dapat dipastikan. Dari gambaran
target produksi setiap bulan dan setiap tahunnya, maka di peroleh
kebutuhan karyawan seluruhnya hingga 94 orang.
3.5 INVESTASI
Analisa ini didasarkan atas proyeksi kebutuhan investasi maupun
proyeksi dari pendapatan dengan berdasarkan kondisi 2020, yang
kemudian diproyeksikan selama 5 tahun kedepan. Dimana struktur biaya,
seperti operasional disesuaikan dengan peningkatan jumlah karyawan
Page 88
baik karyawan tetap maupun tidak tetap, peningkatan dasar gaji, dan
bahan-bahan dasar lainnya. Sedangkan untuk struktur investasi
didasarkan ata proyeksi kebutuhan seperti kebutuhan Heavy Equipment.
3.6 KEUANGAN DAN PENERIMAAN NEGARA
Matrik 3.1 :Rencana Strategis Lima Tahun
No KEGIATAN Tahun 2020 Tahun 2021 Tahun 2022 Tahun 2023 Tahun 2024
1 KEGIATAN EKSPLORASI
Blok GGU dan Blok Blok GGU dan Blok Blok GGU dan Blok Blok GGU dan Blok Blok GGU dan Blok
a Lokasi (nama prospek)
GGS GGS GGS GGS GGS
b Biaya (Rp/US$) 8,584,260,000.00
2 PRODUKSI
a Penambangan (Ton) 2,000,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000
b Pengolahan (Ton) 16,500 16,500
3 PEMASARAN (Ton)
- Dalam Negeri 2,000,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000
- Ekspor
4 LINGKUNGAN
Total Luas Bukaan Lahan 8.94 13.79 13.84 13.94 13.76
Total Luas Reklamasi *) 9.49 8.29 9.62 10.32 11.52
5 KESELAMATAN PERTAMBANGAN
Target penurunan Frequency
10% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Rate (FR)
Target penurunan Severity Rate
10% 5% 5% 5% 5%
(SR)
Peningkatan Persentase
5% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Penerapan SMKP (%)
4 TENAGA KERJA
Lokal 80 80 80 320 320
Nasional 14 14 14 47 47
Asing 15 15
5 INVESTASI (Rp) 25,000,000,000 25,000,000,000 25,000,000,000 25,000,000,000 25,000,000,000
KEUANGAN DAN PENERIMAAN

6
NEGARA
Pajak 45,500,000,000 50,000,000,000 55,000,000,000 60,000,000,000 65,000,000,000
Non Pajak 91,650,000,000 110,156,250,000 110,156,250,000 110,156,250,000 110,156,250,000
Page 89
Lampiran I Peta Rencana Bukaan Tahun 2020 PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
Page 90
Lampiran II Peta Rencana Infrastruktur PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
Page 91
Fmetalurgy
JORC REPORT RESOURCE AND

RESERVE ESTIMATION FOR THE
PT. SUMBER SWARNA PRATAMA,
NORTH MOROWALI, INDONESIA
by:
SAP Consulting
Report Number: 0724 SAP/REP/04/2019
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SAP Consulting was asked by PT Sumber Swarna Pratama (SSP) to conduct a technical
evaluation of estimated resources and reserves in its mining concessions. The concession
is located in Morowali Utara Regency, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. In 2009, SSP had a
licensed of exploration activities by Morowali Regent Decree with number
540.2/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2009. The exploration activities conducted during 2 (two) years
from 2009 - 2011 to find out the prospect of resources. In earlier 2011, SSP management
was proposed Mine Permit Production change their mined licensed. After that on July 11th
2011, The Morowali government issued a decree with number 540.3/SK.001/9.
Supposedly, in 2011 PT. SSP can do operating and producing their ore.
There is a structure with lineament relative north of the sea area that separates between
Ultramafic Complex and Matano Formation. As a result of the lineament with this pattern,
it indicated that in the concession has been lifting zone that separates two relatively
upright rock units. The drill Log bore space distance is distributed from 200 meters, 100
meters, 50 meters, and 25 meters. Log bore space distance distribution will be
representing the level of ensuring the probability of the ore distribution also resources
and reserve of the ore itself, 2318 drill holes of PT SSP exploration study with a total
depth of 34,770 m width zone boundary around 428.095 Ha was found useful for
interpretation geology modeling with 400-meter distance extrapolation.
Resources Inferred (Per - April 2019)

Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
Prospect Type Tonnes
Ni Co Fe Sio2 Mgo Cr Al Mn Ca
0.6 -1.3
887,487 0.91 0.02 16.87 35.64 5.64 1.56 5.01 0.69 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
8,431,126 1.46 0.03 18.66 35.11 5.31 1.57 5.03 0.68 0.04
GGU
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,546,793 1.68 0.03 19.64 35.86 10.41 1.57 5.01 0.68 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
6,878,024 1.79 0.03 20.50 37.51 14.77 1.58 5.01 0.69 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
443,743 2.11 0.02 25.78 44.23 19.63 1.56 5.22 0.70 0.03
Sub Grand Total (GGU BLOCK)
22,187,174 1.61 0.03 20.13 38.15 11.59 1.57 5.06 0.69 0.04
0.6 -1.3
808,936 0.89 0.03 19.55 33.71 12.09 1.59 4.98 0.68 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
7,684,895 1.40 0.03 17.41 36.89 16.78 1.59 4.95 0.69 0.03
GGS
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,055,852 1.62 0.02 17.87 37.64 17.53 1.60 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
6,269,256 1.78 0.03 24.33 39.48 18.83 1.59 4.96 0.70 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0
404,468 2.27 0.03 32.11 24.12 20.33 1.57 4.75 0.70 0.03
Sub Grand Total (GGS BLOCK)
20,223,407 1.57 0.03 22.57 33.33 39.55 1.59 4.92 0.69 0.03
Grand Total
42,410,581 1.59 0.03 21.39 35.62 15.90 1.58 4.99 0.69 0.03
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| ii

Resources Indicated (Per - April 2019)
Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
0.6 -1.3
330,927 0.90 0.03 19.96 35.03 6.20 1.59 5.01 0.67 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
3,860,819 1.45 0.04 17.78 33.69 5.84 1.59 5.03 0.69 0.04
GGU
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 2,978,346 1.69 0.04 17.88 34.84 11.45 1.60 5.01 0.68 0.03
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
3,529,891 1.89 0.03 24.84 37.25 16.24 1.59 5.01 0.68 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0
330,927 2.09 0.03 32.78 37.98 21.59 1.57 5.22 0.70 0.03
11,030,911 1.67 0.03 22.08 36.13 12.52 1.58 4.92 0.68 0.03
0.6 -1.3
594,485 0.88 0.03 17.22 33.14 7.06 1.56 4.98 0.68 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
6,935,659 1.42 0.04 19.05 36.26 7.69 1.57 4.95 0.68 0.04
GGS
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,350,365 1.65 0.04 20.05 37.00 10.49 1.57 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
6,341,174 1.86 0.03 26.32 38.81 12.41 1.58 4.96 0.70 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
594,485 2.05 0.04 31.12 38.88 16.04 1.56 4.75 0.71 0.03
19,816,168 1.63 0.04 22.86 37.22 39.55 1.57 4.92 0.69 0.04
Grand Total
30,847,079 1.64 0.04 22.48 36.68 14.14 1.58 4.98 0.69 0.03
Resources Measured (Per - April 2019)

Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
0.6 -1.3
669,877 1.00 0.05 19.96 34.58 6.92 1.58 5.01 0.67 0.02
LIM 1.3-1.5
6,028,893 1.48 0.04 17.78 33.25 6.52 1.59 5.03 0.69 0.04
GGU
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,359,016 1.69 0.04 17.88 34.39 12.77 1.60 5.01 0.68 0.03
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
10,048,154 1.72 0.04 24.84 36.76 18.12 1.60 5.01 0.68 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0
893,169 2.31 0.03 32.78 37.49 24.09 1.62 5.22 0.70 0.03
22,999,109 1.65 0.04 22.01 35.66 13.96 1.60 4.92 0.68 0.03
0.6 -1.3
615,304 0.97 0.04 17.22 32.71 7.88 1.59 4.98 0.68 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
5,537,732 1.46 0.05 19.05 35.79 8.58 1.60 4.95 0.68 0.04
GGS
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 4,922,429 1.65 0.03 20.05 36.52 11.71 1.60 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
9,229,554 1.71 0.04 26.32 38.30 13.84 1.59 4.96 0.70 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
820,405 2.15 0.04 31.12 38.37 17.89 1.58 4.75 0.71 0.03
21,125,424 1.87 0.04 22.70 36.74 39.55 1.59 4.92 0.69 0.04
Grand Total
44,124,533 1.90 0.04 22.36 36.20 15.38 1.60 4.98 0.69 0.03
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| iii

The ore reserve estimation is the further result from the calculation of mineral resources
estimation. The variables including case studies, mine sequence & design, mining
economic analysis, and reserve boundaries interpretation are based on recruitments,
standard, and procedures of JORC 2012.
Probable Reserve (Per - April 2019)

Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
1.3-1.5 2,580,037
1.36 0.04 16.96 30.11 6.94 1.57 4.97 0.68 0.04
LIM
1.5-1.7 1,355,551
GGU 1.54 0.04 17.05 32.80 13.60 1.57 4.96 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0 2,015,101
1.81 0.03 23.69 33.92 19.29 1.58 4.98 0.69 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0 188,000
2.12 0.04 31.27 36.26 25.64 1.58 4.95 0.71 0.03
Sub Grand Total (GGU BLOCK) 6,138,688
1.57 0.04 22.15 33.80 16.82 1.58 4.97 0.69 0.03
0.6 -1.3 2,051,008
1.34 0.05 18.17 32.26 9.13 1.59 4.95 0.68 0.03
LIM
1.5-1.7 1,691,702
GGS 1.63 0.04 19.13 35.31 12.06 1.59 4.95 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0 1,027,672
1.97 0.04 25.11 36.02 10.73 1.61 4.97 0.69 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0 55,339
2.21 0.04 29.68 37.78 19.00 1.59 4.96 0.70 0.04
4,825,721 1.59 0.04 22.74 35.70 39.55 1.59 4.96 0.69 0.04
Grand Total
10,964,409 1.58 0.04 22.46 34.77 17.57 1.59 4.96 0.69 0.03
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| iv

Proven Reserve (Per - April 2019)
Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
1.3-1.5
5,706,934 1.42 0.05 16.10 33.67 7.74 1.56 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM
1.5-1.7
GGU 3,068,800 1.65 0.03 16.98 32.37 15.17 1.57 4.95 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
4,300,054 1.86 0.04 22.29 33.08 21.52 1.57 4.98 0.69 0.02
SAP 2.0-3.0
3,006,880 2.21 0.04 26.36 35.79 28.60 1.58 4.97 0.70 0.03
16,082,667 1.73 0.04 20.38 33.92 18.44 1.57 4.97 0.69 0.03
1.3-1.5
7,258,023 1.38 0.03 15.10 31.80 10.19 1.59 4.97 0.69 0.03
LIM
1.5-1.7
GGS 6,309,281 1.62 0.03 21.00 30.81 13.90 1.59 4.97 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
5,796,566 1.81 0.02 27.77 35.55 16.04 1.59 4.94 0.70 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
3,211,328 2.15 0.03 20.45 33.30 14.75 1.58 4.96 0.69 0.03
22,575,198 1.66 0.03 20.47 33.15 39.55 1.59 4.96 0.69 0.03
Grand Total
38,657,865 1.68 0.03 20.42 33.53 18.70 1.58 4.97 0.69 0.03
The Mine planning sequence and design at PT SSP is focused on Gandaganda minesite.
The justification of it because the distribution of each drill space is close (around 25
meters to 100 meters) and have a small portion of protection forest. GGU and GGS Blocks
have a big zone of the territory that not related to protection forest with an area of
approximately around 345.7 Ha. This zone is optimized for mine openings, waste dumps,
stockpiles, and infrastructure.
The fundamental criteria for design an open pits and access in PT Sumber Swarna
Pratama, are dump truck with 10 Wheels (Width 3.5 m), with an average of 25 ton vessel
capacity, berm width is 4 meters. Overall slope around 45-65 degree and single slope 65
degrees, provide berm in every bench, the planned production rate of 3,000,000 DMT of
ore per month does not deplete the Reserve significantly, even after a 10-year production
schedule. The project shows a steady positive cash flow, with an estimated EBITDA of
USD123.56M over 12 years.
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| v

(DISCLAIMER)
SAP Consulting provides all data and information in this report. I have checked and
reviewed the information provided. The accuracy of the results and conclusions of the
review depends entirely on the accuracy and completeness of the data provided. This
report I made uses the information available for PT. SUMBER SWARNA PRATAMA as on the
date stated on the cover page.
This report contains forecasts, estimates, and findings that might materially change
because the information given to me is inaccurate or material changes. I have no
obligation to update the information contained in the report.
I am not responsible for errors or omissions in the information provided and do not accept
any obligations arising from commercial decisions or actions produced.
The assessments and assumptions contained in this report are prepared professionally and
can be accepted by the geological evaluation of nickel deposits. The opinions presented
in this report apply to existing site conditions at the time the author reviews. This opinion
does not always apply to conditions and results that may arise after the date reported,
or for conditions/information that the author did not know before, nor for the opportunity
to evaluate.
I do not know and pay attention to issues such as environment, forest status, licensing,
legal status, taxation, socio-political issues, marketing or other people that can materially
affect the estimation of mineral reserves.
The results of the technical studies conducted is not depend on any previous agreements
regarding conclusions that can be drawn, and also there is no concealed understanding of
all business matters going forward.
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| vi

Competent Person Statement
In preparing reports on resources and reserves, there is required an accountable code of
ethics. Thus, the information contained in the report is reliable data in obtaining resource
and reserve calculations. PT. SSP is a nickel mining company that has a mining permit in
production based on the decree of North Morowali Regent with Number 540.3 / SK.001 /
9 with an area of 2.641 ha, which has concessions in Ganda-Ganda, Tenasia District, North
Morowali Regency, Central Sulawesi.
The information contained in this report is a statement compiled by David Frans Siregar
who was a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (MAusIMM. This
report was also assisted by experts namely Mr. Umar Rifaldy Pulukadang as Head Mining
Division and Mr. Hazred Umar Fathan as Sr. Geologist. Currently, those names are
associate consultants from PT. Sampulu Adijaya Prakarsa. At first, Mr. Frans is an
exploration geologist who has much experience in exploring nickel laterite in the Sulawesi
region, after that Mr. Frans focuses on increasing expertise on reporting mineral resources
and reserves until now. Mr. Frans is an AusIMM Competent Person on mineral commodities
and as a Project Manager of SAP Consulting.
The information in this report refers to The Australasian Code for Reporting Exploration
Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code) version 2012. All information
relating to the tonnage of the calculations is classified based on the minimum requirement
of data divided by the level of trust, low to high. Then, in the calculation of mine
economic estimation, it refers to the long term forecast of mining in Indonesia.
Signed by,
Competent Person
David Frans Siregar, S.T., MausIMM

302058
Project Manager
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| vii

Qualification of Consultant
PT. Sampulu Adijaya Prakarsa, mostly called as “SAP Consulting” is a mining consultant who
domiciled in Jakarta, with a total of ± 25 staff with different multidiscipline science and engineering
that related geoscience and civil background.
SAP Consulting is an independent consultant who has integrity in the manufacturing of various
mining projects and cannot be influenced by certain parties in making his report. Until now, SAP
Consulting has experience in various projects such as measured boundary concession, evaluations
and assessment reports, geographic information system, mineral and coal expert reports, feasibility
study, reclamation documents, the newest technology in the mining industry, due diligence and
other documents relate upstream to downstream. A team working at SAP Consulting has
experienced professionals with capabilities that have been certified by their fields of expertise.
This report was made by a mining and geology division team based in Jakarta, Indonesia.
Thus, the responsibilities contained in this report are the results of work that has been validated
and can be trusted by its designation.
Best Regards,
Wasis Sriyadi, S.T., M.T.

Director
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| viii

TERMINOLOGY
APL Other Land Use, the category of APL is legal to exploration and production
activities without permission from the Ministry of Forestry
BPS Badan Pusat Statistik, the Indonesian Statistician Agency as an institution who
provide statistical data in the region
CoG Cut-off grade
DEM Digital elevation model
DMT Dry metric tonnes/tons
DTM Digital terrain model
GIS Geographic Information System
GPS Geographic Positioning System
ha Hectare
IUP Izin Usaha Pertambangan, permit to doing activities relate exploration and
exploitation of mineral resources in the area have stricted by point of
coordinate system which polygon shape
km Kilometre
m meter
masl the meter above sea level
OB Overburden
SAP PT. Sampulu Adijaya Prakarsa
SSP PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
GGU Gandaganda Utara Blocks
GGS Gandaganda Selatan Blocks
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXPLORATION REPORT ......................................................................... 1

1.1. Introduction ................................................................................ 1
1.1.1. Background............................................................................. 1
1.1.2. Purpose and Objectives .............................................................. 1
1.1.3. Physiography and Morphology....................................................... 1
1.1.4. Demographic and Infrastructure.................................................... 2
1.1.5. Climate ................................................................................. 3
1.1.6. Forestry Status ........................................................................ 4
1.2. Geological Setting ......................................................................... 5
1.2.1. Regional Geology...................................................................... 5
1.2.2. Concession Geology................................................................... 7
1.3. Exploration Activity ....................................................................... 8
1.3.1. Geodetic Survey ...................................................................... 10
1.3.2. Mapping................................................................................ 10
1.3.3. Deposit and Mineralization ......................................................... 11
1.3.4. Drilling ................................................................................. 14
1.3.5. Moisture Content and Density ..................................................... 14
1.3.6. Logging and Sampling ............................................................... 15
1.3.7. Sample Preparation and Assays .................................................... 15
2. RESOURCES ESTIMATE ......................................................................... 17
2.1. JORC Code Resource ..................................................................... 17
2.2. Database Model ........................................................................... 18
2.2.1. Database Connectivity .............................................................. 18
2.2.2. Database Validation ................................................................. 18
2.2.3. Statistical Review .................................................................... 19
2.2.4. High-Grade Cuts ...................................................................... 20
2.3. Modeling and Resources Estimation .................................................. 21
2.3.1. Drill Hole Management .............................................................. 21
2.3.2. Wireframe and Block Models ....................................................... 21
2.3.3. Specific Gravity ...................................................................... 25
2.3.4. Cut-Off Grade Factor ................................................................ 25
2.3.5. Classification ......................................................................... 25
2.3.6. Mineral Resource Statement ....................................................... 26
3. RESERVE ESTIMATION ......................................................................... 29
3.1. Mining Method............................................................................. 30
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| x

3.1.1. Methodology .......................................................................... 31
3.1.2. Selective Mining Unit (SMU) ........................................................ 31
3.1.3. Mining Method and Geometry ...................................................... 31
3.1.4. Quality Control ....................................................................... 33
3.2. Mining Equipment and Infrastructure ................................................ 33
3.2.1. Operation Schedule .................................................................. 34
3.2.2. Mining Equipment .................................................................... 34
3.2.3. Mining Infrastructure ................................................................ 35
3.3. METALURGY ................................................................................ 36
3.3.1. NPI Smelting in Blast Furnace...................................................... 36
3.3.2. Material Preparation and Sintering Manufacturing ............................. 40
3.3.3. Sintering Plant ........................................................................ 41
3.4. Capital and Operating Cost ............................................................. 42
3.4.1. Financial and Economic Assumption .............................................. 42
3.4.2. Capital Cost ........................................................................... 44
3.4.3. Operating Cost and Sales Price Expected ........................................ 44
3.5. PIT Optimization and Design ........................................................... 44
3.5.1. PIT Optimization Concept .......................................................... 44
3.5.2. Parameters ............................................................................ 45
3.5.3. Result .................................................................................. 45
3.5.4. Mine Design and Scheduling Strategy ............................................. 46
3.5.5. Parameters ............................................................................ 46
3.5.6. Basis of PIT Access, Road Design, Waste Dump. ................................ 46
3.5.7. Mine Schedulling Set-up ............................................................ 48
3.6. Ore Reserve Estimate.................................................................... 54
3.7. Trend Nickel Demand and Supply ..................................................... 56
4. Reference........................................................................................ 58
5. Section 1 Estimation & Reporting of Ore Reserve ...................................... 59
7. Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources ............................ 64
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| xi

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 IUP PT. SSP Situation, North Morowali, Central Sulawesi ........................ 3
Figure 1-2 Forestry Map status in 2014 ............................................................ 5
Figure 1-3 Tectonic Setting of Sulawesi (Kadarusman et al., 2006) .......................... 7
Figure 1-4 Geological Map of PT. SSP Concession, according to data by Geological
Agency at Geological of Poso Quadrangle, 1 :250.000 in scale, 1997 ........................ 8
Figure 1-5 Drill hole Map in IUP PT. SSP included 25 m spacing, 100 m spacing, and 200
m spacing ............................................................................................... 9
Figure 1-6 Nickel laterite profile (Ellias, 2002) ................................................. 13
Figure 2-1 Distribution geochemical of Fe (%) all blocks in the concession. ............... 20
Figure 2-2 Distribution geochemical of Ni (%) all blocks in the concession. ................ 20
Figure 2-3 Each boundary zones to estimate resources in GGU and GGS Blocks at IUP PT.
SSP. ..................................................................................................... 22
Figure 2-4 Geological Section in GGU and GGS Blocks A-B and C-D.......................... 23
Figure 2-5 Geological Section in GGU and GGS Blocks Swarna A-B and C-D. .............. 23
Figure 3-1. The reserve prospect in GGU and GGS Blocks ..................................... 30
Figure 3-2 Selective Mining Unit (SMU) Plan Distribution in PIT .............................. 31
Figure 3-3 General Geometry for Mine Design in PIT Gandaganda ........................... 32
Figure 3-4 Analysis of Geotechnical at Mining Front of PIT Gandaganda ................... 33
Figure 3-5. Map of Mining Infrastructure Supporting Around PIT Gandaganda ............. 35
Figure 3-6. Part of Blast Furnace .................................................................. 39
Figure 3-7. Profile Blast Furnace of PT SSP ...................................................... 39
Figure 3-8. 3D Model of Blast Furnace Constraction ............................................ 40
Figure 3-9. Sintering Manufacturing Process ..................................................... 41
Figure 3-10. Profile Sintering Machine Plan of PT SSP ......................................... 42
Figure 3-11. PIT Optimization result with PIT shell in PT Sumber Swarna Pratama Mining
Zone Consension. ..................................................................................... 45
Figure 3-12. The Final PIT boundary Life of Mine (LOM) PIT Gandaganda Mine Design. .. 47
Figure 3-13. Waste dump and PIT in blocks. ..................................................... 48
Figure 3-14. Material Movement Scenario in the Scheduling Setup .......................... 51
Figure 3-15 Mine Production Schedule Lay-Out Map of Gandaganda Minesite in blocks, PT
Sumber Swarna Pratama ............................................................................ 52
Figure 3-16. Pre Mining VS Post Mining of PIT Gandaganda MInesite in blocks according to
12 Years Mine Scheduling Life of Mine (LOM) .................................................... 53
Figure 3-17. Prediction of Nickel Consumption till 2020 (Source: Wood Mackanzie) ..... 56
Figure 3-18. Nickel demand based on country (Source: Wood Mackanzie) ................. 57
Figure 3-19. Electric Car Growth Projection (Source: VP SOLAR) ............................ 57
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| xii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1 Boundary Coordinates IUP PT. SSP ..................................................... 4
Table 1-2 Historical exploration activities in IUP PT. SSP ...................................... 9
Table 1-3 Summaries of density and moisture content in the concession. ................. 14
Table 1-4 Summary of Historical Drilling in a concession ...................................... 15
Table 2-1 Descriptive Statistic from geochemical results of Ni (%) and (Fe%) in the
concession ............................................................................................. 19
Table 2-2 Estimation parameter in concession area. ........................................... 21
Table 2-3 Classification to calculate resources mineral ....................................... 25
Table 2-4 Inferred resources estimation in GGU and GGS Blocks ............................ 26
Table 2-5 Indicated resources estimation in GGU and GGS Blocks ........................... 27
Table 2-6 Measured resources estimation in GGU and GGS Blocks........................... 27
Table 3-1. The NPI element output (plan) ....................................................... 36
Table 3-2. Boundary coordinate of smelters location (PT. Artabumi Sentra Industri) .... 37
Table 3-3. The financial base model for further explanation of economic viability from
the Reserve ............................................................................................ 43
Table 3-4. Years production of wet ore (wmt) .................................................. 51
Table 3-5. Ore Reserve Estimate of Mine Site (probable) ..................................... 54
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| xiii

1. EXPLORATION REPORT
1.1. Introduction
1.1.1. Background
PT. SSP is a nickel mining company which located on a mined area in Ganda-Ganda Village,
Petasia Sub-District, North Morowali, Central Sulawesi which has a concession area of
approximately 2,641 ha (Figure 1-1) and (Table 1-1). In 2009, SSP had a licensed of
exploration activities by Morowali Regent Decree with number
540.2/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2009. On the first stage, the exploration activities conducted
during 2 (two) years from 2009 - 2011 to find out the prospect of resources. In earlier
2011, SSP management was proposed Mine Permit Production change their mined
licensed.
After that, on July 11th 2011, The Morowali government issued a decree with number
540.3/SK.001/9. Supposedly, in 2011, PT. SSP can do operating and producing their ore.
However, in that year the Government through the Directorate General of Mineral and
Coal under Law No. 4/2009, including regulating the export of unrefined mining materials
and prohibiting mining companies in Indonesia from exporting abroad. This matter causes
PT. SSP has not followed up on mining activities in the past few years. Then, during 2017
- 2019, the price of nickel commodities continues to increase, supported by the high
export market demand, wherein several regions of Sulawesi there have been several
smelter companies, making PT. SSP wants to continue its mining activities into production
operations. Thus, PT. SSP collaborated with SAP Consulting to conduct a study and analysis
of estimated resources and reserves of nickel laterite in the concession.
1.1.2. Purpose and Objectives

The activities carried out focus to calculate resources and reserves in areas in Other Use
Land status (APL) regarding the JORC reporting code, 2012. PT. SSP gives trust to SAP
Consulting, which is a mining consultant who has experience in conducting research and
reporting relating to upstream to downstream mining activities. The area to be calculated
is Gandaganda Minesite, which located in the southwest part of the IUP.
1.1.3. Physiography and Morphology

PT. SSP is a part of Petasia Subdistrict that has in low – high hills, undulating terrain, and
directly borders with coastal plain with elevations from 0 - 910 masl, where there are
young stadia rivers and several creeks that cross the concession area. Morphometry at
concession has a slope of up to 65º, where the area that has a more gentle slope which
located in the west to the south, while if it direct east to the northeast the slope will be
SAP Consulting – PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama Nickel Concession| 1

even steeper. The concession area has a hill ridge pattern which is north-west north -
south southeast and closed by Mount Torukono Lambolo at the east.
1.1.4. Demographic and Infrastructure

The concession of PT. SSP can be reached from Jakarta by airplane to Morowali Airport
which located at Morowali Region. If a trip started from Jakarta, it could be accessed
using Jakarta – Makassar route with travel time 2 – 4 hours, after that continued using to
transit using a smaller plane from Makassar - Morowali during 50 minutes. After arriving
from Morowali Airport, we can continue using land transportation to the concession area
in the Ganda-Ganda Village in the northwest of the airport approximately 65 km, with a
travel time of 2 hours. As for public facilities available in the IUP that are homestays,
traditional markets, and several restaurants.
In general, residents who live near around the concession area are a farmer, fisherman,
and traders who sell their produce from their gardens and sea on the market. Some
residents, have worked as miners at several mine sites adjacent to PT. SSP. The potential
of natural resources in the area around mining consists of fisheries and marine sectors,
agriculture, which consists of corn, sweet potatoes, green beans, and soybeans. Then in
the forestry sector consists of various types of wood plants, namely Kumea Wood,
Futumea Wood, Kulatu Wood, Kayu Bintangur.
Then, in terms of infrastructure development, there are not yet sufficient facilities and
need time build of development. In the future, if the mined has been operating, several
supporting facilities will be built such as site office, mess, canteen, toilets, workshops,
etc. As for the downstream process, there create a hauling road that passes through
several community plantations and companies through the southern part of the concession
and then leads east with an estimated length of the path of 11.5 km to reach the port
location.
1.1.5. Scope of Work

In the JORC report process on Resources and Reserves, SAP Consulting is valued by PT.
SSP to analyze the results of data exploration. Related the process of validation and
verification of existing data is based on statements issued by the PT. SSP.
• Reviewing and compiling public reports that have been submitted to the
government;
• Re-checking each component, to ensure the data needed is by the standards
requested;

• Creating a geological model block based on drilling data on laterite nickel deposits
to estimate the resources and reserves of laterite nickel in the prospect area;
• Analyzing the economics of mining based on the proven tonnage and reserves
related to the age of mining and production to be carried out, and;
• Provide reporting on the JORC Code, 2012 by applicable standards.
1.1.6. Climate
Climate conditions that change in an area affect the planning and mining activities in the
concession. Referring to data published by BPS Kab. Morowali Utara in 2018, namely
“Morowali North Regency in Figures 2018”, shows that rainfall data in the past year has
an average intensity of 390,566 with the highest incidence occurring in June (715.4 mm),
and August (529.5 mm), while daily rainfall has an average of 19.66 mm with the highest
incidence occurring in June and July 2018. Based on available data, the intensity of the
rainy season is quite significant in mid-year, May-August 2019, while the dry season occurs
at the beginning of the year.
Figure 1-1 IUP PT. SSP Situation, North Morowali, Central Sulawesi

Table 1-1 Boundary Coordinates IUP PT. SSP
Latitude Longitude Latitude Longitude
NO NO
Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec Deg Min Sec Degree Min Sec
1 S1 51 53.73 E121 16 7.34 22 S1 55 48.53 E121 17 15.84
2 S1 51 53.73 E121 16 18.33 23 S1 55 56.18 E121 17 15.84
3 S1 52 3.93 E121 16 18.33 24 S1 55 56.18 E121 16 19.31
4 S1 52 3.93 E121 16 25.98 25 S1 56 25.21 E121 16 19.31
5 S1 52 11.97 E121 16 25.98 26 S1 56 25.21 E121 15 21.21
6 S1 52 11.97 E121 16 32.66 27 S1 55 51.28 E121 15 21.21
7 S1 52 42.96 E121 16 32.66 28 S1 55 51.28 E121 15 3.16
8 S1 52 42.96 E121 16 21.86 29 S1 55 8.32 E121 15 3.16
9 S1 52 49.83 E121 16 21.86 30 S1 55 8.32 E121 14 37.06
10 S1 52 49.83 E121 16 15.19 31 S1 54 3.78 E121 14 37.06
11 S1 55 18.91 E121 16 15.19 32 S1 54 3.78 E121 14 20.18
12 S1 55 18.91 E121 19 23.4 33 S1 53 15.53 E121 14 20.18
13 S1 55 33.62 E121 19 23.4 34 S1 53 15.53 E121 14 1.34
14 S1 55 33.62 E121 18 5.49 35 S1 52 24.33 E121 14 1.34
15 S1 55 20.48 E121 18 5.49 36 S1 52 24.33 E121 15 0
16 S1 55 20.48 E121 17 55.28 37 S1 52 33.16 E121 15 0
17 S1 55 32.05 E121 17 55.28 38 S1 52 33.16 E121 15 15.13
18 S1 55 32.05 E121 17 43.31 39 S1 52 40.22 E121 15 15.13
19 S1 55 42.25 E121 17 43.31 40 S1 52 40.22 E121 15 32.01
20 S1 55 42.25 E121 17 29.38 41 S1 52 50.61 E121 15 32.01
21 S1 55 48.53 E121 17 29.38 42 S1 52 50.61 E121 16 7.34
1.1.7. Forestry Status

Referring to the Decree Letter by Ministry of Forestry by Number 869 in 2014, the
conditions of land use that are in the PT IUP. SSP, is in four types of forest areas, namely
the other land use (APL) with an area of 455,411 ha, protected forest (HL) with an area
of 1939, 804 ha, Limited production forest (HPT) which is 157,776 ha, and Production
Forest (HP) is limited to an area of 35.8663 ha. Then, the mine development plan will be
carried out in the APL area with the prospect area of ± 375 ha. In the future, PT. The SSP
will apply forest use permits for several other land functions within the IUP that have
economic potential in nickel mining (Figure 1-2).

Figure 1-2 Forestry Map status in 2014
1.2. Geological Setting

1.2.1. Regional Geology
Sulawesi and its surroundings are an island which located at three meetings of colliding
plates, namely Eurasia Plate with relatively slow at the movement, the Pacific Plate that
moves to the west, and the Australia-Indian Plate which moves to the north. As a result
of meeting the three plates, causing the geological conditions in Sulawesi to be
sophisticated while having many potentials for mineral and energy resources.
Refer to the publication of Kadarusman et. al (2006), the stratigraphic conditions and
tectonic development of Sulawesi can be divided into four types, namely, 1) West and
North Sulawesi Volcano-Plutonic Arc; 2) Central Sulawesi Metamorphic Belt; 3) East
Sulawesi Ophiolite Belt and; 4) Banggai-Sula and Tukang Besi Continental Fragments
The four types formed separately, West and North Sulawesi Volcano-Plutonic Arc along
from the southern arm to the northern arm of Sulawesi. Then, the East Sulawesi Ophiolite
Belt is the result of the spread of the Pacific Ocean in the Cretaceous - Eocene, which

found in the eastern part of Sulawesi. Whereas, Banggai-Sula and Tukang Besi Continental
Fragments are a fraction of the northern edge of Australia. After that, on the Central
Sulawesi Metamorphic Belt is composed of ophiolite melange and metamorphic rocks
(Figure 1-3)
North Morowali is an area located on the Central Sulawesi Metamorphic Belt and East
Sulawesi Ophiolite Belt which is close to East coastal line Sulawesi. North Morowali is one
of the nickel producer districts in Sulawesi. The morphologies in the concession such as
rounded - angular hills, terrace, and undulating to flat areas, these things made the North
Morowali region has a lateralization process that is good enough to produce nickel. The
Ultramafic rock dominates most of the central Sulawesi metamorphic belt, where the
rock consists of Dunite and Harzburgite. In several locations, found rocks with the marine
environments such as limestone with the type of wackestone and grainstone, marine deep
environment rocks also found in several locations such as chert which indicates that the
North Morowali region has strongly uplift.
Mainly structure that passes through northern Morowali, namely Wekuli, which is a strike-
slip fault with dextral movement. While in the concession area there was a thrust fault
with a relative northwest-southeast direction.

Figure 1-3 Tectonic Setting of Sulawesi (Kadarusman et al., 2006)
1.2.2. Concession Geology

According to Geological Map of Poso Quadrangle 1:250,000 in scale who published by the
Geological Agency in 1997 (Simandjuntak et al., 1997), the concession is found in one
formation, one-unit rocks, and alluvium deposits. There is a structure with lineament
relative north-south that separates between Ultramafic Complex and Matano Formation.
As a result of the lineament with this pattern, it indicated that in the concession has been
lifting zone that separates two relatively upright rock units (Figure 1-4). The explanations
of each formation from younger to older are:
• Alluvium and Coastal Deposits (Qal)

The deposits found in Qal generally contains land and coastal materials, including
sand, clay, mud, pebble, and gravel. The thickness of the accumulated deposits is
related to the morphological conditions and is influenced by the tide wave
according to sea level change.

• Ultramafic Complex (MTosu)
It is part of the East Sulawesi Ophiolite Belt with rocks composed of harzburgite,
lherzolite, wehrlite, dunite, pyroxenite and serpentinite which are Jura-Oligocene
with a formation process associated with volcanic processes with alkaline
properties.
• Matano Formation (Kml)
Composed by Crystalline limestone, argillite, calcilutite, shale and intercalations
of chert and slate, which aged in Cretaceous with precipitation that takes place
in the deep-sea environment.
Figure 1-4 Geological Map of PT. SSP Concession, according to data by Geological Agency at Geological of
Poso Quadrangle, 1: 250.000 in scale, (1997)
1.3. Exploration Activity

The exploration activities that took place in 2009 - 2015 consisting of detailed geological
mapping to obtain the prospect of the area, followed by simple drilling using a hand auger

and trenching. In 2011, increased exploration continued drilling with 200 m spacing, which
spread from the northwest to the south of the IUP area. At several drill holes, it shows an
increase in nickel grade, so it is done to close the drill spacing from 100 m, 50 m, till 25
m. Increased drill spacing continues up to 25 m which is concentrated in the northwest
to the south of the IUP which indicates nickel ore prospect with economic nickel content
to be mine (Figure 1.5) and (Table 1.2).
Figure 1-5 Drill hole Map in IUP PT. SSP included 25 m spacing, 100 m spacing, and 200 m spacing
Table 1-2 Historical exploration activities in IUP PT. SSP
2009 Got licensed from Morowali Government about IUP exploration

2010 PT. SSP has done detailed geological mapping, hand auger drilling, core
drilling by 200 m in spacing
2011 Got licensed by Regent of North Morowali about IUP Production
permission
2014 - 2015 Continue of exploration geology to get detailed sub-surface geology

Middle 2014 There was change forestry status by Decision Letter by Ministry of
Foresty No. 869, 2014
Late 2015 Additional of drill hole till 25 m in spacing to get reserve estimation.
1.3.1. Geodetic Survey

In obtaining accurate coordinate data, measurement coordinate is needed with geodetic
tools to obtain high accuracy up to millimeters. Geodetic surveys in exploration activities
are generally used to record coordinates each drill hole; then also after drilling,
measurements are taken to determine where the actual drill hole is (whether or not a
change occurs). Measurements were made using the Total Station (TS) by coordinate
system WGS 1984 Universal Transerve Mercator (UTM) Zone 51 South. The topographic
data used for modeling comes from the results of aerial mapping photographs. The results
of measuring aerial photographs are processed using Agisoft software to get the combined
photos, then proceed with processing the data into a DTM. Then, DTM data will be used
as topographic data and contour maps in the IUP.
1.3.2. Mapping
Detailed geological mapping is carried out to obtain the distribution of laterite nickel
deposits based on their properties and characteristics. The focus of the mapping was
carried out in several regions that had the potential for high-grade nickel based on remote
sensing and morphology, and the sensitivity of the properties obtained from satellite
imagery processing. Detailed geological mapping is carried out on a scale of 1: 1000 by
carrying out an inventory of rock types, vegetation, weathering levels, and geological
structures with traversed along 5,017 m.
The rocks found in IUP’s are generally ultramafic rocks that encounter chemical
weathered and high oxidized processes. However, in some location, such as in the top or
high elevation, weather and oxidation processes do not take place properly. The rocks
found in conducting detailed mapping include:
• Harzburgite, green to blackish green, full crystal textured. In some places,
especially on the fault line, it shows the traced which has been partially folded,
good – lousy sortation, consisting of olivine, pyroxene, and mafic minerals;
• Dunite is dark grey to blackish, aphanitic textured, in some places, this rock is
high serpentinized which is characterized by dominant olivine (± 95%), pyroxene,

plagioclase, serpentine, talc and magnetite. In general, these rocks show
symptoms of deformation characterized by twin deviations and curvature in
pyroxene. Pyroxene, pale grey to blackish, full crystal to hypomorphic textures,
minerals are consisting of pyroxene (<85%), serpentine and ore minerals.
Based on the results of surface geological mapping, generally the exploration IUP area is
composed of ultramafic rocks with moderate serpentinization, but in some places in the
central to the southwest shows a high level of serpentinization. Macroscopically the types
of ultramafic rocks which are serpentinized are low to medium grey to yellowish green,
with the main mineral content of olivine, pyroxene, serpentine and a low silica and
garnierite. The presence of silica and serpentine minerals are mainly in the zone of rock
veins and scour zones. Ultramafic rocks with high serpentinization levels are greyish
green, with the main mineral content in the form of serpentine (antigorite and chrysotile
species), pyroxene, olivine, and low silica, generally in this rock found in the form of a
corrected structure. In the East, there are fragments of chalcedony silica which are likely
to be released from rocks fracture. The northern part (outside the area) of the exploration
IUP area is found contact lithology between ultramafic and limestone rocks mixed with
quartzite with abundant silica chalcedony content.
1.3.3. Deposit and Mineralization

The process of alteration and mineralization is related to the enrichment of the content
of ultramafic rocks which have a high grade of nickel content. The lateralization
enrichment process takes place due to serpentinization and highly oxidized, which
changes the composition of the host rock. Based on geochemical and mineralogical
composition, the concession area divided into four zones, namely topsoil (TP), limonite
(LIM), saprolite (SAP), and bedrock (BRK). Whereas, if the transition zone classified based
on the dominance of the content. Then in some rocks that are found to have different
weathering properties, such as rocky saprolite or saprolitic rock will be classified into the
saprolite zone.
The level of weather and erosion will form a topography with varying slopes. Generally,
steep slopes will have higher rock resistance compared to gentle to flat slopes, the
relationship of steep slopes will tend to have thickness saprolite zones compared to gentle
slopes. If the lateralization process is complete, the magnesium silica content will
change, then the content of silica and calcium will disappear along with the level of
lateralization. The element concentration will occur in SiO2, MgO, and NiO. High-grade

nickel can occur if the garnierite minerals are in the saprolite zone, Cr2O3 in chromite,
Al2O3, and Fe2O3 are concentrated in the laterite surface.
Determination of lateralization zones in a region can use simple drilling tools, such as
Hand augers and test PITs to be able to obtain vertical zone changes and horizontal
spreads. However, the hand auger usually only reach rocks that have soft material such
as limonite, whereas if penetrate the saprolite or bedrock layers, it is quite difficult.
The lateralization process in this area is supported by geological structures that are
influenced by the tectonic and geomorphological processes so that the ultramafic rocks
are strongly fractured, which then decomposes and forms the laterite zone. The
characteristic of lateralization in the concession that indicates such as low erosion rates,
low run-off flow, and high surface water absorption, thus forming thick laterite deposits
(Figure 1.6). Overall the area of the Laterization Zone which has the potential to contain
nickel ore is 2055.63 ha which based on the overlay of the map of the forest area is known
that the area of the later zone in the forest area.
Based on the results of laboratory tests on samples obtained from the all drill hole,
laterite zone can be seen as follows:
• Brown soil
The soil that is found is generally the result of weathering from ultramafic rock,
where the composition of minerals changes and enrichment of Fe. In some
locations, bedrock boulder was found which indicated that the area tends to have
a shallow nickel laterite zone.
• Limonite zone
This zone is found interval 1 m to 11 m in depth, this zone more thickness on the
ridge and thinned at the slope of the slope with a moderate slope. This zone is
characterized by reddish earth color. The nature of the soil is relatively sticky in
wet conditions which are dominated by iron oxide minerals.
• Saprolite zone
This zone is found interval 2-28 m in depth; the color of yellowish-brownish
characterizes this. Several locations area found weathered gravel. Besides that,
there is also a mineral garnierite in the form of a vein.

• Bedrock zone
This zone is found an interval of 3 - 36 m in depths, this zone is characterized by
the presence of harzburgite, dunite, and serpentinized peridotite rocks. Bedrock
is the nickel-carrying and host rock.
Figure 1-6 Nickel laterite profile (Ellias, 2002)

1.3.4. Drilling
Drilling activities carried out at PT. SSP consists of simple drilling by hand auger, and
diamond rig drill by JACRO 175 engine. In drilling progress, begins with the create drill
pad, sump, and trench to dispose of the results of waste circulation water of drilling. The
specifications of the drill tools used are as follows:
• Power Engineer by Yanmar TF 105 MR-di;
• Power required that is 10,5 HP/ 2400 rpm
• Type machine by Air cooled, four strokes;
• Tank capacity fuel that is 11 liters;
• Tank capacity oil that is 2,8 liters;
• A Unit weight that is ± 375 kg and;
• Accessories weight that ± 1850 kg.
In completing a drill hole, the drilling scheme applied in exploration drilling is:
• HQ pipe (64 mm diameter);
• 1 m pipe per running;
• Using diamond bit;
• Water circulation, sometimes using powder to cementing the hole, if the hole
collapse, fracture or aquifer system and;
• Sanshin SC 120 with max pressure 50 kgf/cm 2, capacity max 48 L/ min
1.3.5. Moisture Content and Density

The measurement of density and moisture content takes place in limonite and saprolite
samples at each run per meter. The data held is in three blocks, namely GGU and GGS
Blocks. The value of dry density (DBD) is the result of the calculation of Wet Bulk Density
with Moisture Content; then in topsoil, it is assumed that the density value used is the
same as limonite density, while bedrock is not done for density measurements (Table 1-
3)
Table 1-3 Summaries of density and moisture content in the concession.
Block GGS Block GGU Block
LIM SAP BRK LIM SAP BRK
Minimum 17.99 4.62 1.12 7.99 3.45 0.17
Low Quartile 31.25 29.20 4.11 32.45 24.68 4.36
Median 34.37 36.91 11.24 35.09 33.15 9.45
Upper Quartile 44.45 41.22 23.14 44.55 44.15 16.25
Maximum 57.12 63.17 54.15 66.48 78.56 69.35
Mean 36.55 38.35 14.96 35.47 34.88 16.23
Std Deviation 8.12 9.87 13.16 9.15 13.25 10.14
Variance 66.97 124.23 148.23 65.88 179.89 112.23

1.3.6. Logging and Sampling
All drilling activities will be recorded in the logged data, which is the result of a
description performed by the Wellsite Geologist, include each interval from breakdown
lithology, color composition, mineral content, weathering rate, etc. All data will be
combined into Ms. Excel format. A pocket camera will capture each core box with a
minimum of 8-megapixel resolution; that reason its purpose, if there is miss decryption,
it can see more detail by doing a zoom on specific layers. Then the information obtained
from the collar data measured by the surveyor will be compiled into primary data to
become a geological database.
The total data described in drill holes is 2318, where break lithology is carried out per 1
meter so that if significant lithological differences occur, it grouped into one rock type
based on its dominance. Meanwhile, in the logged description, detailed information can
be obtained from the recorded data. Described rock samples will be sent to the Intertek
Utama Service Laboratory in Kendari to determine the geochemical composition. Each
sample that has been decrypted will be inserted into an undisturbed plastic sample which
aims to obtain data on the wet condition. When the conditions are raining, drilling will
be stopped, where the risk of a more significant drill hole collapse, plus the presence of
runoff from higher slopes, can cause landslides. Then, every 300 samples that have been
marked by sample number and barcode are delivered to the Inspectorate laboratory in
Morowali for preparation and XRF analysis.
Table 1-4 Summary of Historical Drilling in a concession

Description Hole Depth (m) Sample Assay
Spacing 200 m 9 108 1652 1611
Spacing 100 m 104 1248 1756 1723
Spacing 25 m 2205 26460 29788 29754
Total 2318 27816 33196 33088
1.3.7. Sample Preparation and Assays

All data sent to the Intertek Utama Service Laboratory using the XRF pressed powder
pellet method. All samples were assayed for Ni (%), Co (ppm), Cu (ppm), Mg (%), Mn (%),
Fe (%), Cr (%), Al (%), Na (%), Si (%), Zn (ppm), Ca (%), Ti (%), (P%) and (S%). All data that
has been analyzed will be re-checked to ensure that the data produced has a high level
of accuracy. The process is included in the Quality control includes the standard of
sample, repeat sample, and exclude blank sample stages.

• Standard Sample
Standard samples are a procedure for calculating grades based on the analytical
accuracy method. PT. SSP is a company that does not carry out laboratory work
independently and requires a third party.
• Repeat Sample
Repeat samples are the second method for analyzing based on the same pulp
sample packet. Each repetition of the analyzed sample is estimated to require 12
pulp samples, referring to the "-01" coded in the laboratory result sheet.

2. RESOURCES ESTIMATE
2.1. JORC Code Resource
The Australasian Code for Reporting o Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves, prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of
Australia 1999 and revised in December 2004 and again in December 2012 (the “JORC
Code, 2012”) is a resource/reserve classification system widely used and is internationally
recognized.
The definitions of Resources and Reserves under the JORC Code, 2012 are defined as
follows:
A ‘Resource’ is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest
in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade (or quality), and quantity that there
are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity,
grade (or quality), continuity and other geological characteristics of a Resource are
known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge,
including sampling. Resources are sub-divided, in order of increasing geological
confidence, into Inferred, Indicated and Measured categories.
An ‘Inferred Resource’ is that part of a Resource for which quantity and grade (or
quality) are estimated based on limited geological evidence and sampling.
Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade (or
quality) continuity. It is based on exploration, sampling and testing information
gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops,
trenches, PIT’s, workings, and drill holes.
An Inferred Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an
Indicated Resource and must not be converted to an Ore Reserve. It is reasonably
expected that the majority of Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated
Resources with continued exploration.
An ‘Indicated Resource’ is that part of a Resource for which quantity, grade (or
quality), densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient
confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to
support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.
Geological evidence is derived from the adequately detailed and reliable
exploration, sampling and testing gathered through appropriate techniques from
locations such as outcrops, trenches, PIT’s, workings and drill holes, and is
sufficient to assume geological and grade (or quality) continuity between points of
observation where data and samples are gathered.

An Indicated Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a
Measured Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Reserve. A ‘Measured
Resource’ is that part of a Resource for which quantity, grade (or quality),
densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence
sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine
planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.
Geological evidence is derived from the detailed and reliable exploration, sampling
and testing gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as
outcrops, trenches, PIT’s, workings, and drill holes, and is sufficient to confirm
geological and grade (or quality) continuity between points of observation where
data and samples are gathered
2.2. Database Model

2.2.1. Database Connectivity
All database owned by PT. SSP was recorded from 2009 until now, which has a complex
data structure. The addition of geological information, survey, drilling, and laboratory
data is structured systematically using MS Access format. Data that has been arranged
systematically is stored in Cloud Computing which makes it easier in the sorting and
compiling process of information that will be used in the future. Currently, the data
contained in Ms. Access consists of:
• Geological surface data consist of detailed geological mapping in the form of
distribution of lithology and lateralization zone;
• Drilling data, which consists of drill depth data, coordinates, ID number drill,
geology logging;
• Assay data, which is data derived from laboratory results compiled into geological
modeling data;
• Survey data, which is composed of data during pre and post drilling to determine
an accurate drilling location, and;
• Data density and moisture content, that data will become a part of the geological
data model as one of the parameters to build and calculate tonnage of ore nickel.
2.2.2. Database Validation

The process of data validation aims to ensure the quality of each data owned.
Determination of high- or low-quality data is based on specific methods. On data, retrieval
carried out at PT SSP, in some samples, it is found that there are anomalies (low data)

caused by sampling errors or miss preparation processes that do not follow the procedure.
The quality of each data consists of data:
• Data collar, which is composed of information on drill hole coordinates that is
naming of drill holes, depth, and elevation obtained from measurements in the
field using geodetic equipment;
• Geological data, which is information that consists of several full coring
description results carried out during drilling and lithological changes related to
weathering and chemical processes that affect the value of grade nickel;
• Geochemical data, that is data derived from laboratory analysis consisting of the
values of each element found in rocks, moisture, and density values, and
determination of wet and dry tonnage conditions using several formula equations.
All those data explanations above are carried out by the quality process to minimize errors
and data errors that come from misrepresentations or inappropriate procedural analyzes.
The data that has been carried out by the validation process will be continued with
processing the geology model and estimation of mineral resources.
2.2.3. Statistical Review

Descriptive statistics found in GGU and GGS blocks have a normal distribution, as for
statistical data from the geochemical results of Ni and Fe can be seen in table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Descriptive Statistic from geochemical results of Ni (%) and (Fe%) in the concession
Parameter Ni (%) Fe (%)
Mean 1.023394337 26.66214
Standard Error 0.002214661 0.075626
Median 1.304666667 27.74
Mode 1.45 10.95
Standard Deviation 0.396696475 13.54629
Sample Variance 0.157368093 183.502
Kurtosis -0.070699111 -1.41264
Skewness -0.620108004 -0.04933
Range 3.462318841 53.63
Minimum 0.133333333 1.14
Maximum 3.595652174 54.77
Sum 37937.1223 855454.9
Count 32085 32085
Based on the geochemical distribution of Ni and Fe elements, it shows a different trend.

On Fe, it shows that there are two peaks (assymetrical form), that are in the range 10-12
% and 42 %, the two peaks are formed because of two zones namely saprolite, where Fe
content tends to be smaller, whereas in the limonite zone Fe will tend to increase. (Figure

2-1). Then, in the Ni distribution, there is a bi-modal pattern where the peak distribution
occurs at 0.55 - 0.6 % nickel grade, the lower the nickel level indicates the rock will
approach the host rock (Figure 2-2)
3000
2500
2000
Frequency
1500
1000
500
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60
Figure 2-1 Distribution geochemical of Fe (%) all blocks in the concession.
2500
2000
Frequency
1500
1000
500
0
0.8
2.9
0.2
0.5
1.1
1.4
1.7
2.3
2.6
3.2
3.5
0.05
1.55
0.35
0.65
0.95
1.25
1.85
2.15
2.45
2.75
3.05
3.35
Figure 2-2 Distribution geochemical of Ni (%) all blocks in the concession.
2.2.4. High-Grade Cuts

Determination of block models in resource estimation uses the inverse distance weighted
method. If there is a data error, the multi-element outlier will be deleted in the data
assays. Determination of high-grade cuts is based on a theoretical concept that is relevant
to the geological conditions in the concession area. The parameters used in determining
estimates can be seen in table 2.2.

Table 2-2 Estimation parameter in concession area.
Prospect Method Discrete (point) Search
Distance
(meter)
GGS Block Inverse Distance Weighted 3x3x1 30 x 30 x 10
GGU Block Inverse Distance Weighted 3x3x1 30 x 30 x 10
2.3. Modeling and Resources Estimation

The geological model carried out at PT. SSP uses several different mining software. The
modeling process which has up to 25 m till 200 m spacing data.
2.3.1. Drill Hole Management

Determination of drilling in drill hole plan in the concession area is based on nickel grade
priority. Usually, the drilling plan will begin at edges indicated as a boundary of the
distribution of nickel laterite. If it turns out that nickel grade limitation, there is no
prospect, drilling will be focused on high-grade nickel based on assays using a distance
radius around it. If a drilling recovery occurs below <95% or there is a fracture in the
borehole that causes the sample cannot rise to the surface or is on a steep slope, make
the potential for landslides will occur. Then, the procedural applicable is that the drilling
will be moved with a vertical or horizontal (grid system) movement from a maximum drill
hole of a radius of 5 m.
2.3.2. Wireframe and Block Models

Wireframe modeling is done by making contact between the saprolite, limonite and
bedrock zones, where it can occur if drill data that has a grid arranged on a spacing.
Topographic data is one of the crucial things to be able to identify the overburden,
Determination of boundary boundaries of each level of estimated confidence, based on
the adequacy of drill data. Where the drill data with a 25 m spacing can be used to
calculate the measured resources, while in a few blocks that have a 100 m spacing, only
indicated and inferred resources could be calculated. In blocks that have 200-400 m
spacing, inferred resources are used. Determination of extrapolation from boundary
resources uses buffer zones that use the standards set by JORC, 2012 through the
wireframe tools in mining software (Figure 2-3 till 2-7) The determination of each
resource classification includes:
• 25 m spacing, using 25 m triangle without extrapolation;
• 50 – 100 m spacing, using 100 m triangle without extrapolation and;
• 200 – 400 m spacing, using 400 m triangle without limit extrapolation.

Then, in determining the block model that is made, it is focused on drill data that has a
spacing of 25-50 m, while in the drill data that has more spacing than that is not done
using a detailed enough parent cell size 10 x 10 x 1 m, which aims to get a probability
from high resource estimates.
Figure 2-3 Each boundary zones to estimate resources in GGU and GGS Blocks at IUP PT. SSP.

Figure 2-4 Geological Section in GGU and GGS Blocks A-B and C-D.
Figure 2-5 Geological Section in GGU and GGS Blocks Swarna A-B and C-D.

Figure 2-6 Geological Section A – A’ in west side view
Figure 2-7 Geological section B – B’ in west side view

2.3.3. Specific Gravity
Specific Gravity is a method for converting tonnage volumes of a mineral deposit. Based
on the geological database that is owned and the distribution population of existing data,
calculations will be carried out in situ bulk density in the limonite, saprolite, and bedrock
zones based on the data to be done.
The value of bulk density used refers to international standards on rocks and is compiled
with each existing zone. After compiling, the determination will be based on the mean
and variance of data. The values of each type are 1.71 tonnes / m3 for saprolite, 1.77
tonnes / m3 for limonite, 2.21 tonnes / m 3 for OB, and 3.15 tonnes / m3 for bedrock. To
ensure there is no bias in data, the value of grades of Ni more than (+ 1%) will be equalized
with the saprolite zone.
2.3.4. Cut-Off Grade Factor

Referring to the geochemical data obtained from the laboratory, the determination of
the possible COG in limonite and saprolite zone is a cut-off grade of 1.3%. This is because
at low levels can be used for the blending process of high Ni content. Another reason is,
generally, the raw material produced by PT. The SSP will be used for export purposes and
not used directly in the processing metallurgy.
2.3.5. Classification
Class determination in estimating mineral resources is based on drill hole spacing, changes
in lateralization, lateral distribution minerals, availability of data assays obtained from
the geochemical analysis. Based on the current criteria, the classification level of
resource estimates in the concession area can be seen in Table 2-3.
Table 2-3 Classification to calculate resources mineral

Classification Explanation Drill hole spacing (m)
Inferred Reasonable/low-density data form 200 – 400
limonite and saprolite zone
Indicated Good density data form limonite and 50 – 100
saprolite zone
Measured High-density data form limonite and 25
saprolite zone

2.3.6. Mineral Resource Statement
Resource statement issued in this report on April 22nd 2019, where there are no mining
activities taking place in the concession area. We are very confident that the method
used in the process of calculating resources has approached actual resources based on
surface geological data and subsurface geology. All resources issued are the result of a
review by a competent person and the team and do not involve third parties. All resources
use the base of the dry tones (DMT) unit. The calculation in the resource can be seen in
table 2.4 – table. 2.6.
Table 2-4 Inferred resources estimation in GGU and GGS Blocks

Resources Inferred (Per - May 2019)
Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
0.6 -1.3
887,487 0.91 0.02 16.87 35.64 5.64 1.56 5.01 0.69 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
8,431,126 1.46 0.03 18.66 35.11 5.31 1.57 5.03 0.68 0.04
GGU
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,546,793 1.68 0.03 19.64 35.86 10.41 1.57 5.01 0.68 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
6,878,024 1.79 0.03 20.50 37.51 14.77 1.58 5.01 0.69 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
443,743 2.11 0.02 25.78 44.23 19.63 1.56 5.22 0.70 0.03
22,187,174 1.61 0.03 20.13 38.15 11.59 1.57 5.06 0.69 0.04
0.6 -1.3
808,936 0.89 0.03 19.55 33.71 12.09 1.59 4.98 0.68 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
7,684,895 1.40 0.03 17.41 36.89 16.78 1.59 4.95 0.69 0.03
GGS
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,055,852 1.62 0.02 17.87 37.64 17.53 1.60 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
6,269,256 1.78 0.03 24.33 39.48 18.83 1.59 4.96 0.70 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0
404,468 2.27 0.03 32.11 24.12 20.33 1.57 4.75 0.70 0.03
20,223,407 1.57 0.03 22.57 33.33 39.55 1.59 4.92 0.69 0.03
Grand Total
42,410,581 1.59 0.03 21.39 35.62 15.90 1.58 4.99 0.69 0.03

Table 2-5 Indicated resources estimation in GGU and GGS Blocks
Resources Indicated (Per - May 2019)

Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
0.6 -1.3
330,927 0.90 0.03 19.96 35.03 6.20 1.59 5.01 0.67 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
3,860,819 1.45 0.04 17.78 33.69 5.84 1.59 5.03 0.69 0.04
GGU
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 2,978,346 1.69 0.04 17.88 34.84 11.45 1.60 5.01 0.68 0.03
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
3,529,891 1.89 0.03 24.84 37.25 16.24 1.59 5.01 0.68 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0
330,927 2.09 0.03 32.78 37.98 21.59 1.57 5.22 0.70 0.03
11,030,911 1.67 0.03 22.08 36.13 12.52 1.58 4.92 0.68 0.03
0.6 -1.3
594,485 0.88 0.03 17.22 33.14 7.06 1.56 4.98 0.68 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
6,935,659 1.42 0.04 19.05 36.26 7.69 1.57 4.95 0.68 0.04
GGS
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,350,365 1.65 0.04 20.05 37.00 10.49 1.57 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
6,341,174 1.86 0.03 26.32 38.81 12.41 1.58 4.96 0.70 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
594,485 2.05 0.04 31.12 38.88 16.04 1.56 4.75 0.71 0.03
19,816,168 1.63 0.04 22.86 37.22 39.55 1.57 4.92 0.69 0.04
Grand Total
30,847,079 1.64 0.04 22.48 36.68 14.14 1.58 4.98 0.69 0.03
Table 2-6 Measured resources estimation in GGU and GGS Blocks
Resources Measured (Per - May 2019)

Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
0.6 -1.3
669,877 1.00 0.05 19.96 34.58 6.92 1.58 5.01 0.67 0.02
LIM 1.3-1.5
6,028,893 1.48 0.04 17.78 33.25 6.52 1.59 5.03 0.69 0.04
GGU
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 5,359,016 1.69 0.04 17.88 34.39 12.77 1.60 5.01 0.68 0.03
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
10,048,154 1.72 0.04 24.84 36.76 18.12 1.60 5.01 0.68 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0
893,169 2.31 0.03 32.78 37.49 24.09 1.62 5.22 0.70 0.03
22,999,109 1.65 0.04 22.01 35.66 13.96 1.60 4.92 0.68 0.03
0.6 -1.3
615,304 0.97 0.04 17.22 32.71 7.88 1.59 4.98 0.68 0.03
LIM 1.3-1.5
5,537,732 1.46 0.05 19.05 35.79 8.58 1.60 4.95 0.68 0.04
GGS
1.5-1.7
BLOCK 4,922,429 1.65 0.03 20.05 36.52 11.71 1.60 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
9,229,554 1.71 0.04 26.32 38.30 13.84 1.59 4.96 0.70 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
820,405 2.15 0.04 31.12 38.37 17.89 1.58 4.75 0.71 0.03
21,125,424 1.87 0.04 22.70 36.74 39.55 1.59 4.92 0.69 0.04
Grand Total
44,124,533 1.90 0.04 22.36 36.20 15.38 1.60 4.98 0.69 0.03

The parameters used in determining resource estimates include:
• CoG used in the saprolite zone and limonite zone is 1.3 %;
• The topography used comes from aerial photographs using the DJI Phantom 4 Pro;
• All exploration activities include detailed geological mapping, drilling, survey, and
an assay has been completed on the GGU and GGS Blocks
• The collar data is carried out using the total station recorded by the survey team
from PT. SSP;
• All drilling performed on the IUP is done vertically
• Recovery from the sample analyzed is ≥95%, whereas if recovery is lower than the
specified value, it will be repeated drilling at a radius of 2 m from the location of
the previous drill point;
• Drilling is carried out by 1-meter run, single barrel slim, using HQ size pipe with
JACRO 175 engine;
• In determining the lateral zone in the concession area, it is based on the surface
geological mapping with a scale of 1: 10,000 using a grid system and paying
attention to the type of vegetation that grows on the surface of the land;
• The classification of resource estimates is divided into three, namely 25 m by 25
m, for Measured Estimation; 100 m by 100 m for Indicated Estimation; and 200 m
by 200 m for Inferred Estimation. The density level of the drill point is based on
the enrichment of nickel laterite;

3. RESERVE ESTIMATION
The ore reserve estimation is a further result from the calculation of mineral resources
estimation. The variables including case studies, mine sequence & design, mining
economic analysis, and reserve boundaries interpretation are based on recruitments,
standard, and procedures of JORC 2012.
The mine planning sequence and design study that count as a probable and proven are
located inside the PIT boundary of indicated and measured resources zone that has been
calculated with economic analysis interpretation. The inferred resources zone are
forbidden to convert as a reserve because it doesn’t meet the recruitments of JORC 2012
standard and procedure.
The Mine planning sequence and design at PT SSP is focused on the centre of blocks. The
justification of it because the distribution of each drill space is close (around 25 meters
to 100 meters) and have a small portion of protection forest (Figure 3-1). GGU and GGS
Blocks has a big zone of the territory that not related to protection forest with an area
of approximately around 345.7 Ha. This zone is optimized for mine openings, waste
dumps, stockpiles, and infrastructure. For further explanation, it will be explained in the
next section in the report on estimating this mineral reserve.
The mine design and scheduling in GGU and GGS Blocks block will be explaining more
further and detail in this chapter to securing the supply of nickel import demands from
overseas. The mine design and scheduling with the long-term study in PIT are initiated
from the analysis of facilities and infrastructure, government regulatory zone boundary,
port distance, and the economic analysis that related with investment also the operation
cost.

Figure 3-1. The reserve prospect in GGU and GGS Blocks
3.1. Mining Method

The Mining method section in this chapter will explain the fundamental information about
how the data are requested, calculate, processing, and any methodology assessments for
support the estimation of ore reserve according to the recruitment standard and
procedure according to JORC 2012. The scoops that will be explained detail in this section
are methodology, selective mining unit (SMU), mining method, geotechnical assessment
and quality control in nickel mine industry.

3.1.1. Methodology
The following elements of the methodology are data request, detail mane planning,
equipment selection, cost estimation analysis, ore transportation, drawing, and
reporting. The archive of data is requested and collected from the related department in
PT Sumber Swarna Pratama, contractor, and also sub-contractor in the field. The final
report is including with PIT optimization, long term planning, and economic analysis of
nickel laterite mine.
3.1.2. Selective Mining Unit (SMU)

Selective mining unit (SMU) is the size of the modeling block that applied in mine plan
process to achieve the selective mining result with a representation of available data of
resources. The size of selective mining unit is the same or bigger size than the resource
blocks. The blocks size of resources in this study case used a 10 x 10 x 1m block size. This
size is representative with the geometry of the single bench height (10 meters) and mining
width front operation (Figure 3-2)
Figure 3-2 Selective Mining Unit (SMU) Plan Distribution in PIT
3.1.3. Mining Method and Geometry

Lateritic nickel is defined as a nickel ore deposit formed from the later process in
ultramafic rocks (peridotite, dunite, and serpentinite) which contain high levels of Ni,
which are generally formed in tropical and sub-tropical regions. These formed applicable
with the Open cast mining method for maintenance to keep the openings of mining front
keep stable and continuous mining activity. The mining movement of open cast mining

method can operate from top to bottom or the opposite way. Mining operation activity in
open cast mining system is supported by digger, loader, hauler, dozer, and other
supporting production equipment (Figure 3-3).
Figure 3-3 General Geometry for Mine Design in PIT Gandaganda
Mostly the benches in PIT Gandaganda have geometry parameters as follow:

• Single Slope : 55 -70 Degree
• Overall Slope : 45 – 65 Degree
• Bench Height : 10 Meters
• Berm Width : 4 Meters
This bench geometry can portray from Figure 3-2 about general geometry for mine design
in PIT Gandaganda.
The archive geotechnical data are collected by the exploration and drilling contractor
when they run and exploration activity, then through the data analysis and data
processing show the result of monitoring the mine area that related with limonite layer
mining benches pushback (Figure 3-4).

Figure 3-4 Analysis of Geotechnical at Mining Front of PIT Gandaganda
3.1.4. Quality Control

Ore Quality Control (OQC) is a part of the Mine Ore Quality Assurance (MOQA) section
usually under the Mining Department. The function of Laterite Nickel Grade control (GC)
is to monitor the mining or stripping activity for produce the highest ore tonnage with the
minimum waste material and can fulfill optimally the need of the factory (Ni, FE, and S
/ M content) that according to factory specification. The monitoring by the grade control
are supporting with dozer and backhoe operators in the field. Quality control in mining
activity are described by two methods, that are:
• Post land clearing, to evaluate if there any dilution between topsoil, overburden,
and the ore material before the ore getting process
• Pre-Land Clearing, to evaluate and classify between the ore grade distribution and
waste lineation. Field data sampling, geological, drill, and block model data also
support the quality control activity to assist the short-term target of mine plan
sequence production.
3.2. Mining Equipment and Infrastructure

The Mining Equipment and Infrastructure section in this chapter will explain the
fundamental information about how the mining operation variables achieve the long-term
production target of mine planning sequence design in PIT Gandaganda. The scoops that

will be explained detail in this section are the operation schedule, mining equipment,
and mining infrastructure.
3.2.1. Operation Schedule

The plan timeframe of operation schedule in PIT Gandaganda, PT SSP with as following:
• The effective operating plan for day/year minimum is 85% or 311 days/year.
• The effective operation plan for an hour/day minimum is 87.5% or 21 Hours/day.
• The mechanical availability factors (MA) plan is 85%. (This factor included for
digging, loading, hauling, auxiliary and support mine operation equipment).
• The utilization factor (UA) plan is 80%.
• The operational efficiency plan is 75%.
All those variables are the result of the conservative scenario to achieve mining target
production to fulfilling the minimum recruitments of JORC 2012 ore reserve estimation.
3.2.2. Mining Equipment

PT Sumber Swarna Pratama, especially for the mining equipment production in PIT
Gandaganda already fulfill the needs consist of digger (bucket excavator), hauler
(articulated dump truck), loader, auxiliary equipment, LV 4WD, water truck, grader,
compactor, wheel loader, etc. Furthermore, the information of mining equipment that
related directly to achieve mining target production are described by three big parties
(Figure 3-5).
• Haulage Equipment
The productivity of the hauler (dump truck) is related to the specification of
capacity and the effective cycle factor from loading, hauling, dumping, and back
to the loading point in one cycles of timeframe. Hauler with 24 Ton of average
load from in PIT to dump point will accommodate it.
• Loading Equipment
Excavator is the loading equipment that will execute the digging and loading the
ore, waste, or blending material in mining front, dump point, and waste dump.
Excavator with bucket capacity 1.2 m 3 will accommodate it.
• Auxiliary Equipment
Bulldozer, compactor, wheel loader, water truck, fuel truck, and etc will be ready
for supporting the mining production operation.

3.2.3. Mining Infrastructure
Mining infrastructure will be providing the supporting needs of acquisition and
development strategy including the supporting facilities for the employee and the
manpower on site.
Figure 3-5. Map of Mining Infrastructure Supporting Around PIT Gandaganda
PT Sumber Swarna Pratama has been plotted the mining infrastructure supporting around
PIT Gandaganda with the size approximate 17.26 Ha. It is included workshop, refined fuel
oil, site office, canteen, mess, and toilet to accommodating all the employee. There are
also have an existing road for hauling to port with distance around 11,5 Km from GGU and
GGS Blocks

3.3. METALLURGY
The strategy of business development from PT SUMBER SWARNA PRATAMA for the future
is to collaborate with PT ARTABUMI SENTRA INDUSTRI (ASI) ni nickel NPI Processing. It
will process nickel ore with grade around 1.7 % - 1.8 % and produce around 300.000 Nickel
Pig Iron (NPI). The NPI content element that will be produced from this plan is below :
Table 3-1. The NPI element output (plan)
Composition Fe Ni C Cr P Si S
Grade (%) 81.5 10 3.3 2.5 0.6 1.8 0.4
The main raw material is nickel laterite ore sinters, redactor material (coke), and
dolomite as a material addition. Unlike iron ore which can be fed in form lump to Blast
Furnace, lateritic nickel ore needs to be made sintered first to obtaining the strength and
porosity required in reduction and smelting in the Blast Furnace. In full, the laterite nickel
ore smelting becomes NPI with technology Blast Furnace is carried out through two stages,
namely:
• Preparation of materials and making sintered
• Smelting in Blast Furnace To get a better picture, it will begin with a discussion
about NPI Smelting in Blast Furnace.
3.3.1. Location
PT Artabumi Sentra Industri's NPI plant development plan area is located in the Laroenai
area, located in the southern part of Morowali, Sulawesi Tengah Province. Initially the
Laroenai Hamlet is located in Bungku Selatan District. Coastal Bungku District. The
boundary of development plan area are listed in figure and table below.

Figure 3-6. Smelter situation map of PT. Artabumi Sentra Industri
Table 3-2. Boundary coordinate of smelters location (PT. Artabumi Sentra Industri)
No. Longitude Lattitude

1 122° 16' 05.1319" E 3° 02' 42.3984" S
2 122° 16' 05.1271" E 3° 02' 49.4654" S
3 122° 15' 59.2312" E 3° 02' 49.4614" S
4 122° 16' 05.9343" E 3° 02' 53.5694" S
5 122° 16' 13.6119" E 3° 02' 53.6072" S
6 122° 16' 13.9990" E 3° 02' 55.9848" S
7 122° 16' 11.9560" E 3° 02' 59.2075" S
8 122° 16' 04.6358" E 3° 02' 57.4114" S
9 122° 16' 04.6387" E 3° 02' 53.1777" S
10 122° 15' 58.5833" E 3° 02' 49.4609" S
11 122° 15' 56.7044" E 3° 02' 49.4596" S
12 122° 15' 56.6997" E 3° 02' 56.3964" S
13 122° 15' 44.5839" E 3° 02' 56.3880" S
14 122° 15' 44.5935" E 3° 02' 42.3844" S

3.3.2. NPI Smelting in Blast Furnace
The raw materials are arranged in layers. Hot air exhaled through a tuyer located at the
bottom of the furnace so that it allows coke (coke) to burn effectively and for encouraging
the formation of carbon monoxide (CO) that reacts with the content of nickel and iron
and then produce molten nickel-iron and carbon dioxide (CO2) gas. With the use of hot
air, you can save coke by 30% more.
The air is heated in the shape of the initial heater (stove) cylindrical tower, up to around
1000oC. The required heat comes from the combustion reaction of carbon monoxide gas
coming out of the furnace. The hot air enters the furnace through the tuyer which is
located right above the hearth collection center. Limestone is used as a flux that binds
dirt which is found in ore and forms liquid slag. This liquid slag lighter than liquid NPI and
floating above it, and periodically issued in the Blast Furnace (di-skim). Liquid NPI that
has been free of impurities flowed into the mold every 5-6 hours. For each ton of NPI, 4
- 5 tons of slag (Slag) and ± 6 tons are produced hot gas.
The Blast Furnace has a vertical cylindrical structure which on the outside is made of
thick steel coating, and the inside is coated with fire-resistant material. The general
description of the Blast Furnace is presented in Figure 3-7. The Dimension of the Blast
Furnace, especially for the manufacture of iron, has changed to a large size. With this
size change, there is also a change in capacity. Figure 3-8 and 3-9 shows the various sizes
of the Blast Furnace, ranging from small ones (diameter 0.9 m and height 15.3 m with a
capacity of 25 tons per day) to very large (14 m diameter and 36 m high with a capacity
of 10,000 tons of metal/day).

Figure 3-7. Part of Blast Furnace
Figure 3-8. Profile Blast Furnace of PT SSP

Figure 3-9. 3D Model of Blast Furnace Construction
3.3.3. Material Preparation and Sintering Manufacturing

Materials for sintering manufacture consist of:
• Nickel ore
• Cooking Coal
• Fine sintered screening results
• Limestone
All of these materials are inserted into the proportional bin and then mixed in a mixer
and with a feeder train inserted into the sintered machine. The sintering process is a
heating process until surface melting occurs which causes the ore to become strong and
porous. The sintering process is usually done in a sintered machine in the form of a running
grill (traveling grate). There are also carousel shaped sintering machines, such as those
developed by Minitec in Brazil. In China, vertical sinter machines are developed. The
principle of sintered traveling grate and carousel type sintering machines is almost the
same. After the mixture of ore and fuel is ignited (ignited) and passed on the grate that

runs while being sucked in with a suction pump (exhausted), then the combustion
movement occurs from top to bottom when the grate moves from the feeder to the place
where the sinter is cooked.
3.3.4. Sintering Plant

In the initial design of this project, it was planned to build a circular sintering machine 4
× 48m 2 and 8 blast furnaces, where the sintering machine could produce 1,816,650 t /
sintered. In consideration of market changes in operations and factors that govern the
production, this scheme adopts 4 sintered production lines (Figure 3-10). Based on the
imbalance factor of 5% produced between sintered and blast furnaces, the capacity of
the sintering area is:
1,816,650 ÷ 0.95 = 1,920,000t / a

Sintering machine Area number 2
1,920,000 / (330 × 24 × 4 × 0.5) ≈ 48m
Because the intensity of sintering with laterite as raw material is relatively poor, and for
the purpose of reducing investment and production links, sintered cooling adopts on-
strand cooling. Of the 4 sintered machines, every 1 sintered machine will serve 2 Blast
Furnace, the need for the raw material for the sintered machine (Figure 3-11).
Figure 3-10. Sintering Manufacturing Process

Figure 3-11. Profile Sintering Machine Plan of PT SSP
3.4. Capital and Operating Cost

The Capital and Operating Cost section in this chapter will explain about how the
fundamental economic variables for long term mine planning to support the estimation
of ore reserve according to the recruitment standard and procedure according to JORC
2012. The scoops that will be explained detail in this section are financial and economic
assumptions, capital cost, and operating cost
3.4.1. Financial and Economic Assumption

The information of fixed variables that related directly to financial and economic
assumption are listed:
• Capital and operational expenditure (CAPEX & OPEX) are assumed to growth
around 3.5 % Based on 2019 Inflation per annum.
• 100 Percent equity of capital structure.
• 10 Percent per annum of ore royalty and export fee.
• 5 Percent man power rise per annum
• Depreciation and amortization fac

Table 3-3. The financial base model for further explanation of economic viability from the Reserve
Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 TOTAL
Units
Production
Schedule
PIT Production DMT 800,000 1,250,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 3,125,000 1,920,000 1,920,000 30,890,000
Grade (Ni%) % 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.65
Sales Revenue USD 28,000,000 43,750,000 109,375,000 109,375,000 109,375,000 109,375,000 109,375,000 109,375,000 109,375,000 109,375,000 67,200,000 67,200,000 1,081,150,000
COP
Mining and
USD/t 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
Services
Overheads USD/t 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Overheads USD/t 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Statutory USD/t 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Total Costs USD/t 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31
Total Costs USD 24,800,000 38,750,000 96,875,000 96,875,000 96,875,000 96,875,000 96,875,000 96,875,000 96,875,000 96,875,000 59,520,000 59,520,000 957,590,000
EBITDA USD 3,200,000 5,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 7,680,000 7,680,000 123,560,000

3.4.2. Capital Cost
The concession of PT Sumber Swarna Pratama areas is included the construction of haul
road, camp facilities, mining equipment, and jetty with haven’t considered of any asset’s
depreciation. Future development investment is the focus on shortcut road to jetty,
stockyard, and smelter facilities.
3.4.3. Operating Cost and Sales Price Expected

The information of fixed variables that related directly to operating cost are listed below:
• Exploration Cost : 0.05 $/Ton
• Exploitation Cost : 17.2 $/Ton
(Mining contractor operation
& Consultant mining included)
• Shipping : 8$/Ton
(Heavy equipment rental, fuel, loading
Sample analysis, manpower, Comdev cost included)
• Site facilities and human resource : 2$/Ton
TOTAL : 27.25 $/Ton
The expected sales FOB vessel advised by PT Sumber Swarna Pratama are below:
• Ni 1.65% : 35 $/Ton
• Ni 1.75% : 37.5 $/Ton
• Ni 1.85% : 40 $/Ton
3.5. PIT Optimization and Design

The PIT Optimization and Design section in this chapter will explain about how the input
block model will evaluate with economic variables for long term mine planning and
producing an ultimate PIT to support the estimation of ore reserve according to the
recruitment standard and procedure according to JORC 2012. The scoops that will be
explained detail in this section are financial and economic are PIT optimization concept,
parameter, and result.
3.5.1. PIT Optimization Concept

PIT optimization is the method to select the best boundary PIT limit (ultimate PIT limit)
and to determine the optimum reserve with the maximum net present value (NPV). The
economic variables that related to PIT optimization are mining cost, cut-off grade (COG),

selling cost, time cost, etc. For the technical parameters are mining recovery, area
boundary, block model with fill in attribute, mining dilution, and overall slope angle.
3.5.2. Parameters
The constraint function used for forbidding to produce the PIT shell on a restricted area
like as outside the boundary concession ore forest protected zone. The parameters for
PIT shell of PT Sumber Swarna Pratama as follow:
• Mining Cost : 27.25 $/Ton
• Ore Price (Ni 1.8%) : 37.5 $/Ton\
• Annual Discounting : 10%
• Mining Dilution : 5%
• Mining Recovery : 96%
Notice: The set of parameters is used in the PIT optimization calculation and analysis
process of Mine Site.
3.5.3. Result
The PIT shell result from PIT optimization, Distribution of ore as PIT optimization for each
mine zone (purple) can be seen in figure 3-12.
Figure 3-12. PIT Optimization result with PIT shell in PT Sumber Swarna Pratama Mining Zone Consension.

3.5.4. Mine Design and Scheduling Strategy
The Mine Design and Scheduling Strategy section in this chapter will explain about how
mine design sequence and long-term mine planning scheduling strategy for reach the
target production with the optimum of management mining operation equipment to
support the estimation of ore reserve according to the recruitment standard and
procedure according to JORC 2012. The scoops that will be explained detail in this section
are financial and economic are the basis of PIT and Access Road Design, mine scheduling
methodology, scheduling set-up, and mining long term sequence design.
3.5.5. Parameters
The constraint function used for forbid to produce the PIT shell on restricted area like as
outside the boundary concession ore forest protected zone. The parameters for PIT shell
of PT Sumber Swarna Pratama as follow:
• Mining Cost : 27.5 $/Ton
• Ore Price (Ni 1.8%) : 37.5 $/Ton
• Annual Discounting : 10%
• Mining Dilution : 5%
• Mining Recovery : 95%
Notice: The set of parameters is used in the PIT optimization calculation and analysis
process of Mine Site.
3.5.6. Basis of PIT Access, Road Design, Waste Dump.

The fundamental criteria for designing open PITs and access in Blocks, PT Sumber Swarna
Pratama, are listed below:
• Dump truck with 10 Wheels (Width 3.5 m) with an average of 25 Ton vessel
capacity
• The road is described by two different classifications. Those are “Main Haulage
Road” (MHR) and “Ramp”. Main haulage Road (MHR) is the existing road that will
use for main road facilities, logistic, and haul road too jetty. Main Haulage Road
geometry has 20 m width, including drainage and edge protection. Even thought,
the access that will provide a truck for hauling material from the PIT to, waste
dump and the stockpile is called “ramp” with the geometry have 15-meter width
and 10 percent the optimum incline gradient.
• Bench height is 10 meters.
• Berm width is 4 meters.

• Overall slope around 45-65 degree and single slope 65 degrees.
• Provide berm in every bench.
PIT optimization that produces fixed PIT shell to be the optimum final PIT boundary will
be the main reference for design the PIT Gandaganda until the life of mine (LOM). The
size of PIT Gandaganda mine design around 166.6 Ha and provide by three main ramps
access. First is a north ramp that will be direct access to north waste dump. West ramp
is the second access for directly to stockpile or dump point. The third is the south ramp
that directly connected supporting facilities and infrastructure (Figure 3-13).
Figure 3-13. The Final PIT boundary Life of Mine (LOM) PIT Gandaganda Mine Design.

The design of PIT Gandaganda must be provided with waste dump design strategy to fulfill
the waste that produces from PIT Gandaganda (Figure 3-14). There is two waste dump
that will be provide located near from north and south of the PIT Gandaganda with each
waste volume capacity are 17.8 Million CCM and 12.6 Million CCM (Swelling Factor = 32%).
The fundamental criteria for waste dump design and access in blocks are listed below:
• Bench height is 15 meters.
• Berm width is 3 meters.
• Overall slope around 23-34 degree and single slope 25 degrees.
• Provide berm in every bench.
Figure 3-14. Waste dump and PIT in blocks.
3.5.7. Mine Scheduling Set-up

During the mine schedule planning, the wet tonnes of each material type were used in
the process with some scheduling parameter and constraints will be described as follow:

• Global Variables: Mining Recovery 95%, Dilution 5%.
• Mining Block Size is 25 x25 x 10 m.
• Dependencies: Overall slope angle 53 Degree.
• The production target for each destination.
• Mining would be top to down in each respective area
• Boulder assumption 5 Percent.
The production target for each ore destination is a very important aspect in the mine
scheduling setup. The following description is about the ore specification and volume as
set for the ore sales target (Export + domestic).

• Export Sale target from PT Sumber Swarna Pratama :
• Ore Specification:
Description Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12
Ni% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65% 1.65%
• Sales Volume Target:
Tonnage
(wmt) 640,000 1,000,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 1,536,000 1,536,000
• Domestic Sale target from PT Sumber Swarna Pratama :

• Ore Specification:
Ni% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 1.80%
• Sales Volume Target:
Tonnage
160,000 250,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 625,000 384,000 384,000
(wmt)

• Production Target for Yearly in PIT Gandaganda
Table 3-4. Years production of wet ore (wmt)

Minimum Nickel
Year Wet Ore (wmt pa)
Content (%)
1.00 800,000.00 1.65
2.00 1,250,000.00 1.65
3.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
0.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
5.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
6.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
7.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
8.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
9.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
10.00 3,125,000.00 1.65
11.00 1,920,000.00 1.65
12.00 1,920,000.00 1.65
The following figure shows the setup scenario example of material movement
conducted mine scheduling process to run the mine sites scheduling
(Figure 3-15, 3-16, and 3-17)
Figure 3-15. Material Movement Scenario in the Scheduling Setup

Figure 3-16 Mine Production Schedule Lay-Out Map of Gandaganda Minesite in blocks, PT Sumber
Swarna Pratama

Figure 3-17. Pre Mining VS Post Mining of PIT Gandaganda MInesite in blocks according to 12 Years Mine Scheduling Life of Mine (LOM)

3.6. Ore Reserve Estimate
The ore reserve estimate is derived from the measured and indicated mineral resources
estimate as reported in the previous chapter and has been appropriately modified for :
• Dilution, contamination, and ore losses
• An economic evaluation by means of resource optimization, and the scheduling
PITs in and order to meet processing requirements and blending constraints.
The minable inventory of the concession is characterized as follow:
• The reserve estimate is date stamped the 22nd April 2019
• The tonnages are on a Dry Metric Ton Basis (DMT)
• The tons are only those categorized as Measured or Indicated from the Resources
estimate
• The Reserve are those 2:1 or less, based on the waste characterization and
topographic surface.
Table 3-5. Ore Reserve Estimate of Mine Site (probable)
Probable Reserve (Per - May 2019)

Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
1.3-1.5 2,580,037
1.36 0.04 16.96 30.11 6.94 1.57 4.97 0.68 0.04
LIM
1.5-1.7 1,355,551
GGU 1.54 0.04 17.05 32.80 13.60 1.57 4.96 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0 2,015,101
1.81 0.03 23.69 33.92 19.29 1.58 4.98 0.69 0.03
SAP 2.0-3.0 188,000
2.12 0.04 31.27 36.26 25.64 1.58 4.95 0.71 0.03
Sub Grand Total (GGU BLOCK) 6,138,688
1.57 0.04 22.15 33.80 16.82 1.58 4.97 0.69 0.03
0.6 -1.3 2,051,008
1.34 0.05 18.17 32.26 9.13 1.59 4.95 0.68 0.03
LIM
1.5-1.7 1,691,702
GGS 1.63 0.04 19.13 35.31 12.06 1.59 4.95 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0 1,027,672
1.97 0.04 25.11 36.02 10.73 1.61 4.97 0.69 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0 55,339
2.21 0.04 29.68 37.78 19.00 1.59 4.96 0.70 0.04
4,825,721 1.59 0.04 22.74 35.70 39.55 1.59 4.96 0.69 0.04
Grand Total
10,964,409 1.58 0.04 22.46 34.77 17.57 1.59 4.96 0.69 0.03

Table 3 6. Ore Reserve Estimate of Mine Site (proven)
Proven Reserve (Per - May 2019)

Block Material
Ni (%) Content (%)
1.3-1.5
5,706,934 1.42 0.05 16.10 33.67 7.74 1.56 4.98 0.69 0.04
LIM
1.5-1.7
GGU 3,068,800 1.65 0.03 16.98 32.37 15.17 1.57 4.95 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
4,300,054 1.86 0.04 22.29 33.08 21.52 1.57 4.98 0.69 0.02
SAP 2.0-3.0
3,006,880 2.21 0.04 26.36 35.79 28.60 1.58 4.97 0.70 0.03
16,082,667 1.73 0.04 20.38 33.92 18.44 1.57 4.97 0.69 0.03
1.3-1.5
7,258,023 1.38 0.03 15.10 31.80 10.19 1.59 4.97 0.69 0.03
LIM
1.5-1.7
GGS 6,309,281 1.62 0.03 21.00 30.81 13.90 1.59 4.97 0.69 0.03
BLOCK
LIM - SAP 1.7-2.0
5,796,566 1.81 0.02 27.77 35.55 16.04 1.59 4.94 0.70 0.04
SAP 2.0-3.0
3,211,328 2.15 0.03 20.45 33.30 14.75 1.58 4.96 0.69 0.03
22,575,198 1.66 0.03 20.47 33.15 39.55 1.59 4.96 0.69 0.03
Grand Total
38,657,865 1.68 0.03 20.42 33.53 18.70 1.58 4.97 0.69 0.03
Notes :
• Mineral resources processed by mining engineer to be economically mineable ore
reserves. Estimation of Ore Reserves goes through the “modifying factors” by
considering mining, metallurgical, economic, marketing, legal, environmental,
infrastructures, social, and governance aspects.
• The measured and indicated mineral resources in this report are inclusive of those
mineral resources modified to produce the ore reserve estimate. So that, the ore
reserves estimate above are part of measured and indicated mineral resources as
stated in the Mineral Resources Estimation chapter.
• The measured and indicated mineral resources in this report are inclusive of those
mineral resources modified to produce the ore reserve estimate. So that, the
ore reserves estimate above are part of measured and indicated mineral
resources as stated in the Mineral Resources Estimation chapter.

3.7. Trend Nickel Demand and Supply
Rapid technological developments at 4.0 Industrial Revolution caused the need for mining
materials to constantly increase. One of the commodities that are the main focus is Nickel,
where materials can be used for several industries such as stainless, mixed batteries, steel
processing, gadgets, and several other mixtures. Based on the analysis conducted by Wood
Mackanzie, the annual growth trend is indeed increasingly significant.
Figure 3-18. Prediction of Nickel Consumption till 2020 (Source: Wood Mackanzie)
The global demand for nickel has increased dramatically in 2017, where the increase is due
to the use of stainless materials. The country with the largest nickel consumption is located
in China, where from 7% stainless growth in 2017, China accounts for 5.8% of global growth.
Several other countries, such as in Europe and North America, and Japan, are also among
the largest nickel users in the world. Based on Mineral Reference Price (HMA) at the
beginning of 2019 until now, the nickel price trend continues to increase and this has led to
a significant increase in the Indonesian mining condition in the nickel commodity. Referring
to the trend that will occur until 2030 from Wood Mackanzie data, nickel will be one of the
commodities that has a fairly good demand. So nickel mining activities have the potential
to survive well with price fluctuations in other mining commodities.

Figure 3-19. Nickel demand based on country (Source: Wood Mackanzie)
The last couple and over the next few years, the demand for electric cars will be rapidly
increased. Global trends for the electric car already give a good response to the Chinese
market which the sales of it around 600.000 units sold in 2017 which is double compared in
2016. In 2018, China reaches more than a million for the electric vehicle (EV) sales which
are around 1.053 million. These numbers are higher compared to USA (361.000 EV SALES)
and Norway (73.000 EV SALES). According to the study from VPSOLAR in 2017 state that the
projection of EV Vehicle in the future will be rapidly increased and can reach around more
than 60 Million Electric Car in 2000. This projection gives a good impact for the nickel mine
and processing industry. One of the major commodity for the EV manufacturing and
processing industry is nickel itself. Nickel will be provided for the batteries manufacturing
that related with the VE.
Figure 3-19. Electric Car Growth Projection (Source: VP Sollar)

4. Reference
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Morowali Utara Dalam Angka. Laporan Tahunan BPS Kab.
Morowali Utara
Elias, M., (2002). Nickel Laterite Deposits – Geological Overview, Resources, and
Exploration.
Kadarusman, A., S. Miyashita, S. Maruyama, C.D. Parkinson & A. Ishikawa (2000). Petrology,
geochemistry and paleogeographic reconstruction of the East Sulawesi ophiolite,
Indonesia. Tectonophysics 392, p. 55-83
Parkinson, C.D. (1991). The petrology, structure and geologic history of the metamorphic
rocks of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia.Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 337 pp
Simanjdjuntak, T.O., Surono, and Supandjono, J.B. (1997). Peta Geologi Lembar Poso Skala
1:250.000. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geolog

5. Section 1 Estimation & Reporting of Ore Reserve
Criteria JORC Code Explanation Gandaganda Minesite
Sampling Techniques • Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, • Sampling is done by vertical drilling, where end of hole will be
or specific specialized industry standard measurement tools carried out provided that it has found a bedrock with a thickness of
appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down 3 m (generally), which uses a JACRO 175 engine.
hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These • The principal geologist is responsible for conducting training for the
examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of wellsite geologists on duty including techniques in sampling and
sampling. description of rocks.
• Regional drilling is generally carried out with spacing > 200 m, while
detailed drilling is carried out with spacing of 25-50 m.
• Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample re • Sampling has done meter by meter
presentivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
• Aspects of the determination of mineralization that are Material • Wellsite geologist is the key feature to get information about
to the Public Report. mineralization in concession
• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this woul • Drilling density start from the regional of 200x200 meters spacing
dbe relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used continued until 25x25 meters.
to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulve rised to produce
a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation
maybe required, such as where there is coarse gold that has
inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralization types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, • All sampling Drill type is using HQ pipe yang that taken by per meter
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core each run
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- • All resource samples are by HQ equivalent sized diamond drilling.
sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, • Core drilling Conducted by drilling contractor from China
by what method, etc).
Drill sample recovery • Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample • Minimum recovery drill is 95% of total depth, where if there is a core
recoveries and results assessed. lose in the saprolite layer up to 2 m, red drill will be carried out.
• Measures taken to maximize sample recovery and ensure • Each drilling run will be captured in the core box and labeled per
representative nature of the samples. meter / lithology changes.
• Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and • Nickle ore logging fully completed in drilling logs, drilling progress
geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate and conducted on core photos for documentation and to facilitate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical checking and data validation and supported by geological mapping,
studies. geological models, the results of Chemical Analysis Core, Collar,

• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or QAQC very supportive for the calculation of resource estimation and
costean, channel, etc) photography. mining
• The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections • Description drill logs the data contained drill progress percentage
logged. for each interval based on the clear zone and supported by the
progress of cores that detail.

Sub- sampling techniques • If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all • Drillcore was marked during the core logging process, identifying
and sample preparation core taken. mineralization and boundary
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and • Drillcore was sampled by core cutter
whether sampled wet or dry. • Half core was applied for duplicate (back up) sample in the site.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of • Analysis sample were conducted at Intertek Laboratory which
the sample preparation technique. located in Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages • Sample being analysys by 12 pulp samples, referring to the "-01"
to maximize representivity of samples. coded in the laboratory result sheet.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of
the in-situ material collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are ap
Quality of assay data and • The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and • Analysis carried out on the following elements, as follows: Ni (%),
laboratory tests laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is Co (ppm), Cu (ppm), Mg (%), Mn (%), Fe (%), Cr (%), Al (%), Na (%),
considered partial or total. Si (%), Zn (ppm), Ca (%), Ti (%), (P%) and (S%).
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, • Analysis does not use physical methods, only focuses on XRF.
etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including
instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards,
blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have
been established.
Verification of sampling • The verification of significant intersections by either • Validation of data is carried out by the principal geologist of work
and assaying independent or alternative company personnel. carried out by the wellsite geologist.
• The use of twinned holes. • All exploration and drilling data will be stored in one main data (big
• Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data data) using Ms. Access format.
verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols • Data adjustment was conducted by field geologist, and senior
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data. geologist

Location of • Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar • The survey conducted for grid point Pre and Post Drill with tools TS
data points and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other and GPS Geodetic Survey. Then prospector also conduct depository
locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. the coordinates of the GPS Navigation.
• Specification of the grid system used. • Specifications with UTM grid system WGS 80 - 51S
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control. • Topography control conducted by looking at the results of count one
cover corner (angle closure error), one cover elevation (elevation
closures) and one cover a distance (distance closures) in closed or
open polygon calculation perfect bound
Data spacing and • Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. • Exploration program started with 200 m space drilling and sufficient
distribution • Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to enough to determined inferred resource classification.
establish the degree of geological and grade continuity • To raise the resource classification, PT Sumber Swarna Pratama has
appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation done the infill drilling up to 25 meters spacing to reach measured
procedure(s) and classifications applied. resource classification.
• Whether sample compositing has been applied. • Sample was not applying composite
Orientation of data in • Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling • Vertical drilling is appropriate for laterite definition. Definition of
relation to geological of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, potential structures from close spaced drilling has not been
structure considering the deposit type. attempted. Detailed mapping to define lateral variability of volumes
• If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the is not available.
orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported
if material.

Mineral tenement and • Type, reference name/number, location and ownership • Mining concession area of PT Sumber Swarna Pratama covering 2601
land tenure status including agreements or material issues with third parties such Ha, is located on Morowali Utara, North Maluku, Indonesia.
as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title • CnC status of Gandaganda minesite area Tenement has been
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and released by government
environmental settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along
with any known impediments to obtaining a license to operate
in the area.
Exploration done by other • Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. • Nickel laterite deposits are formed by near surface weathering of
parties nickel bearing ultramafic rocks. Leaching during weathering causes
depletion of some constituents (most notably magnesia and silica)
and consequent enrichment of other constituents (most notably
iron) near surface. Nickel is concentrated in the near surface
weathered rocks during this process.
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralization. • Vertical drilling is appropriate for laterite definition. Definition of
potential structures from close spaced drilling has not been
attempted. Detailed mapping to define lateral variability of volumes
is not available.
Drilll hole Information • A summary of all information material to the understanding of • All the associated data was available for each hole incorporated into
the exploration results including a tabulation of the following the Mineral Resource.
information for all Material drill holes: • Z completed diamond coring using NQ single tube to get mineralized
• easting and northing of the drill hole collar horizons.
• elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level • All drill hole information as required is tabled as an appendix to the
in meters) of the drill hole collar Mineral Resource Report.
• dip and azimuth of the hole
• down hole length and interception depth
• Hole length
• If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that
the information is not Material and this exclusion does not
detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent
Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging • All assay intervals are based on geological intervals or a 1 m length
techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg if the geological interval is greater than 1 m.
cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material • The validation and verification again by geologists.
and should be stated.
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-
grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some
typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail.
• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent
values should be clearly stated.
Relationship between • These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of • Dilution and waste were not assessed to determine the Nickel
mineralisation widths and Exploration Results. Resources.
intercept lengths • If the geometry of the mineralization with respect to the drill • The geometry applied was that of a semi continuous layer
hole angle is known, its nature should be reported widespread over the plateau areas where geological factors such as
• If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, parent rock type enabled laterite formation.
there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole
length, true width not known’).
Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of • done a cross-sectional geological and subsurface of the existing drill
intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being data.
reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view
of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.
Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not • All areas have been reported in summary form and the nature of the
practicable, representative reporting of both low and high reporting is balanced.
grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading
reporting of Exploration Results. If the exclusion of this
information is justified on the basis that the information is not
Material and this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person should
clearly explain why this is the case.
Other substantive • Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be • Data exploration that made is Geological map, bulk density,
exploration data reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; characteristics of rock, soil water because this area is a mining area.
geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk Potential impurities such as silica is also presented on the general
samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test conditions in the area of exploration drilling. Geophysical and
results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock geochemical surveys were not done yet.
characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.

Further work • The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral • The next step is to define Reserves in terms of the project
extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). economics.
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, • The mineral resources within the existing leases can be increased
including the main geological interpretations and future drilling by further exploration.
areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. • Additional regional exploration should be expedited to capture the
best available nickel potential.
7. Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources

Database integrity • Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, • Data Verification using visual, database cross checks and statistics
for example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial were used to find errors in the database.
collection and its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes. • Only Drill holes with reliable data were reported in the Resources.
• Data validation procedures used. • Improvement in Data storage and data entry procedures and
recovery of some past data has been done to make the data
vitrificated.
• The Data that used in resource estimation process is the same data
from database division which has been done to standardized it
sources whether from lab or exploration team.
• Data created as a series of Microsoft Office Excel softwares files.
Separate file is created for each: collar, survey, assay and geology
(lithology table).
• Validated the data with building the collar, assay, and lithology data
into drill hole data. If there's any error, the data will check from
raw data.
• Zero result, negative result or NA result data changed become half
of detection limit and unidentified assay become absent data.
Site visits • Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person • Site visit has been done by competent person and proposing some
and the outcome of those visits. of improvement
• If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this is the • Site visit and its improvement statement were reported by
case. competent person
Geological interpretation • Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of) the geological • The confidence was built by synchronizing each meter drill hole data
interpretation of the mineral deposit. include logging data, which has been verified with core photo, and
• Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made. checked with assay data by senior field geologist
• The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral • Nickel laterite variation of assay data was good enough.
Resource estimation.

• The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource • Regular spaced sampling demonstrated good continuity of the ore
estimation. thickness and have some grade variability but not much and disperse
• The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology. in big coverage area
• The fact about interspace data zone is exist but it forced become
no interspace data for simplify geological model that will be used in
estimation process.
• The geology of the Deposit is well understood from drill holes data
and mapping, continuity of grade along down drill holes and detailed
geological logging of drill hole.
• Geology is key to estimate, by its lithology control that verified with
assay data.
• Lateritic Boundary was used to limiting coverage of estimation area.
• erratic depth of weathering gives significant impact.
• presence of the boulder, structure and erratic boundary affecting
continuity grade and geology
Dimensions • The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as • The dimension is determined based on zone which is taken from
length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below exploration data logging and assay result domaining, which being
surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource. wireframing after each bore zone were conducted.
• Its continuity was limited by the laterite boundary
• The large extent and location of the resource is consistent with the
basement geology and topography profile covering to a maximum
depth of generally 25 m and a maximum of 70 m.

Estimation and modelling • The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) • Extrapolation distance was using variography range and being
techniques applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme extrapolated maximum 000 metre.
grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and • Simplistic analysis on estimation of 10 x 10 x 1m blocks has provided
maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a a reasonable basis for estimating the resource on a global basis.
computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a • Estimates result always compared with previous estimates.
description of computer software and parameters used. • The contain of boulder which make lower grade.
• The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or • Request of grade range by economic and technical consideration.
mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource • Correlation between assay were analyzed in EDA and it has
estimate takes appropriate account of such data. • The correlation between CO, FE, MgO and SIO2 for domaining.
assumptions made regarding recovery of byproducts. • Controlling boundary of resource estimation as geological
• Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables domaining, boundary laterite and drill hole penetration limit
of economic significance (eg sulphur for acid mine drainage • Top cutting is really important to avoid overbiased near of extreme
characterization). grade and it has been done by statistical analysis and economic
• In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in projection.
relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed.
• Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units.

• Any assumptions about correlation between variables. • Validate Block Bodel by overlaying it with drillhole data whether it's
• Description of how the geological interpretation was used to result has closed enough or not.
control the resource estimates. • Comparing the statistic resume as mean, min,max etc.
• Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or • Validation using visual and database cross checks were used to find
capping. and correct errors in the resource estimation.
• The process of validation, the checking process used, the
comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of
reconciliation data if available.
Moisture • Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with • Tonnages are estimated just focus on dry basis
natural moisture, and the method of determination of the • In GGS block have a greater value of mean than the GGU Block.
moisture content.
Cut-off parameters • The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality parameters • The resource model is constrained by assumptions about economic
applied. cut-off grades.
• The ore zone interpretations are based upon a low-grade cut-off
grade of effectively 1.3%.

Mining factors or • Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum • Cut-off Grade uses 1.3%, then laterite boundary is based on the
assumptions mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) results of detailed geological mapping.
mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of
determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the
assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters
when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous.
Where this is the case, this should be reported with an
explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made.
Metallurgical factors or • • The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding • Based on the detailed chemical analyses, data that applied on Cut-
assumptions metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the off Grade is possible to assess the metallurgical amenability of the
process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual Nickel.
economic extraction to consider potential metallurgical
methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment
processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral
Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case,
this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the
metallurgical assumptions made.
Bulk density • Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the • Bulk density was measured in many exploration areas with PIT
assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or sampling method. •
dry, the frequency of the measurements, the nature, size and
representativeness of the samples.

• The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by • In concession area, the in situ wet bulk density are 1.71 tonnes / m3
methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, for saprolite, 1.77 tonnes / m3 for limonite, 2.21 tonnes / m3 for
etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration OB, and 3.15 tonnes / m3 for bedrock.
zones within the deposit.
• Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the
evaluation process of the different materials.
Classification • The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into • Classification varied slightly between the deposits. All classification
varying confidence categories. of resource estimates was based on a combination of drill hole
• Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant spacing, the ranges of mineralization continuity, availability of all
factors (ie. relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, assay suits for geochemical classification.
reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and • Measured Mineral Resource Drill spacing of 25x25 meter (depending
metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data). on deposit).
• Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent • Indicated Mineral Resource Drill spacing of 50x50 meter until
Person’s view of the deposit. 100x100 meter (depending on deposit and variography results).
• Inferred Mineral Resource Drill spacing of 200x200 meter until
000x000 meter, including material extended beyond the last line of
drilling where deposits have not been closed out.
Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource • The results of the drilling program and the estimated Resources
estimates. have been done
• The laboratory work was cross checked (Intertek)
Discussion of relative • Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and • The confidence level of the data is based on the adequacy of
accuracy/ confidence confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an geological data (drill hole, assays, and collar), where the
approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent identification of mineral resources will have an impact in economic
Person. For example, the application of statistical or calculations;
geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the • All data will be sorted first based on data quality and procedural
resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach sampling carried out in the field.
is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors • All of the nickel is considered to ultimately be economic.
that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the
estimate.
• The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local
estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which
should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation.
Documentation should include assumptions made and the
procedures used.
• These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the
estimate should be compared with production data, where
available.


Mineral Resources estimate • Mineral resources model are estimatated by SAP CONSULTING (PT
for Conversion to Ore Sampulu Adijaya Prakarsa)
Reserves • Description of the Mineral estimate used as a basis for the
• Ore reserve estimate has been determined as part of and classified
conversion to an Ore Reserve
based on measured and indicated resources into proved and
probable ore reserve
• Clear Statement as to whether the Mineral Resources are • The measured and indicated bauxite resources are inclusive of
reported additional to, or inclusive of, the Ore Reserves those mineral resources modified to produce the ore reserve
Site Visits • Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent
Person and the outcome of those visit. • Site visit done by Competent Person Team
• If no site visits have been undertaken indicated why this is the
case.
Study Status • The type and level of study undertaken to enable Mineral
Resources to be converted to Ore Reserves
• The Code requires that a study to at least Pre-Feasibility Study
Level has been undertaken to convert Mineral Resources to Ore
• Feasibility Study
Reserve. Such studies will have been carried out and will have
determined a mine plan that is technically achievable and
economically viable, and that material Modifying Factors have
been considered.
Cut-off Parameters • The basis of the cut-off grade (s) or quality parameters applied • Ni > 1.3% as generally for mine optimization
Mining factors or assumptions • The method and assumptions used as reported in the Pre-
Feasibility or Feasibility Study to convert the Mineral Resource
• Pit optimization was used to determine economic PIT limits
to an Ore Reserve (I.e. either by application of appropriate
factors by optimization or by preliminary or detailed design).
• The choice, nature and appropriateness of the selected mining
• Based on ore distribution assessment
method(s) and other mining parameters including associated
design issues such as pre-stri, access, etc.
• The major assumptions made regarding geotechnical
• PIT Slope 65 Degree
parameters (eg PIT slopes, stope sizes, etc), grade control and
Overall Slope 52 Degree
pre-production drilling.
• The major assumptions made and Mineral Resource model used • Assumed from existing archive data from exploration activity
for PIT and stope optimization (if appropriate).
• The mining dilution factors used. • Mining Dilution used is 5 Percent
• The mining recovery factor used • Mining Recovery used is 95 Percent
• Any minimum mining widths used. • Minimum mining width is 30 meter

• The manner in which Inferred Mineral Resources are utilized in
mining studies and the sensitivity of the outcome to their
inclusion
• The Infrastructure requirements of the selected mining
• Require stockpile, waste dump, townhouse, etc.
methods.

Metallurgical factors or • The metallurgical process proposed and the appropriateness of • PT ASI use Blast Furnace Technology for NPI Plant with ore spec :
assumptions that process to the style of mineralization. Ni = 1.8 % , Fe = 18 %, MgO 12.22 %, SiO2 = 38 %, Al2O3 0.50 %, CaO
• Whether the metallurgical process is well-tested technology or = 0.07 %
novel in nature. • Well-tested technology
• The nature, amount and representativeness of metallurgical test
work undertaken, the nature of the metallurgical domaining
applied and the corresponding metallurgical recovery factors • Done
applied.
• Any assumptions or allowances made for deleterious elements. • n/a

• The existence of any bulk sample or pilot scale test work and
the degree to which such samples are considered • Done
representative of the orebody as a whole.
• For minerals that are defined by a specification, has the ore
reserve estimation been based on the appropriate mineralogy • Yes, base odd NPI Plant ore spec requirements
to meet the specifications?
Enviromental • The status of studies of potential environmental impacts of the
mining and
• processing operation. Details of waste rock characterization and
• Done
the consideration of potential sites, status of design options
considered and, where applicable, the status of approvals for
process residue storage and waste dumps should be reported.
Infrastracture • The existence of appropriate infrastructure: availability of land
for plant development, power, water, transportation
(particularly for bulk commodities), labour, accommodation; or
the ease with which the infrastructure can be provided, or
accessed.
• • Assumed from study of projection mine production
Cost The derivation of, or assumptions made, regarding projected
capital costs in the
• study.
• The methodology used to estimate operating costs.
• Allowances made for the content of deleterious elements

• The source of exchange rates used in the study.
• Derivation of transportation charges.
• The basis for forecasting or source of treatment and refining
charges, penalties for
• failure to meet specification, etc.
• The allowances made for royalties payable, both Government
• The allowances for Royalty have been considered
and private
Criteria JORC Code Explanation
Classification • The basis for the classification of the Ore Reserves into varying • The classification used is based on the range level of the drill data
confidence categories. spacing that refers to JORC, 2012
• Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent
• n/a
Person’s view of the deposit.
• The proportion of Probable Ore Reserves that have been derived • Measured data on resources will be converted to proven reserve, in
from Measured Mineral Resources (if any). some conditions with inappropriate drill space data, it will be
classified according to existing categories
Audit or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of Ore Reserve estimates. • n/a
Discussion of relative • Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and
accuracy / confidence confidence level in the Ore Reserve estimate using an approach
or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For
example, the application of statistical or geostatistical • The proven of the results of resource and reserve estimation can
procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the reserve be done by carrying out mining activities.
within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not
deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors
which could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the
estimate.
• The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local
estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which
• Annual mining plan (short term and long term) will be reviewed by
should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation.
operation and production each month.
Documentation should include assumptions made and the
procedures used.
• Accuracy and confidence discussions should extend to specific
discussions of any applied Modifying Factors that may have a • Commodity price, mining cost, and government's regulation give the
material impact on Ore Reserve viability, or for which there are biggest impact for reserves estimation
remaining areas of uncertainty at the current study stage.
• It is recognized that this may not be possible or appropriate in
all circumstances. These statements of relative accuracy and • Mining reconciliation have been conducted to compare mine plan vs
confidence of the estimate should be compared with production actual production
data, where available.

Competent Person’s Consent Form
Pursuant to the requirements of ASX Listing Rules 5.6, 5.22
and 5.20 and
Clause 9 of the JORC Code 2012 Edition
Report name
JORC REPORT RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATION FOR THE PT. SUMBER SWARNA
PRATAMA, NORTH MOROWALI, INDONESIA
(Insertname or heading of Report to be publicly released)(‘Report’)
PT. Sampulu Adijaya Prakarsa
(Insert name of Company Releasing the Report)
Lateritic Nickel
(Insert name of Company Releasing the Report)
April, 22nd 2019

(Date of Report)

Statement
I,
David Frans Siregar, S.T., MausIMM
(Insertfull name(s))
confirm that I am the Competent Person for the Report and:
• I have read and understood the requirements of the 2012 Edition of the Australasian
Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC
Code, 2012 Edition).
• I am a Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code 2012 Edition, having five
years’ experience that is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of
deposit described in the Report, and to the activity for which I am accepting
responsibility.
• I am a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
• I have reviewed the Report to which this Consent Statement applies.
I am a senior consultant working for

PT. Sampulu Adijaya Prakarsa
and have been engaged by

PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama
to prepare the documentation for

Competent Person Report of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves PT. Sumber Swarna
Pratama, North Morowali, Central Sulawesi Nickel Laterite
on which the Report is based, for the period ended

April 22 nd, 2019
I have disclosed to the reporting company the full nature of the relationship between
myself and the company, including any issue that could be perceived by investors as
a conflict of interest.
I verify that the Report is based on and fairly and accurately reflects in the form and
context in which it appears, the information in my supporting documentation relating
to Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves

Consent
I consent to the release of the Report and this Consent Statement by the directors of:
PT SAMPULU ADIJAYA PRAKARSA

(Insert reporting company name)
April, 22nd- 2019

Signature of Competent Person: Date:
Member of AusIMM 302058
Professional Membership: Membership Number:

(Insert organization name)
Wasis Sriyadi S.T, M.T

Director PT SAMPULU ADIJAYA PRAKARSA. Jakarta-Indonesia
Signature of Witness Print Witness Name and Residance:
(eg town/suburb)

Kantor Pusat PT. SSP di Jakarta
Lokasi Tambang Nikel di Morowali Utara, Sulawesi Tengah

Company Profile PT SSP 2020

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Company Profile PT SSP 2020

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA

NOMOR INDUK BERUSAHA (NIB)

Nama Usaha : PT SUMBER SWARNA PRATAMA

Ditetapkan tanggal : 01 September 2019

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama adalah merupakan salah satu

Perusahaan Terbatas (PT) dan merupakan salah satu perusahaan yang

bergerak dalam Bidang Pertambangan yang memiliki konsesi

pertambangan Logam (Nikel dmp.), dimana Izin Usaha Pertambangan

(IUP) Operasi Produksi, sesuai Surat Keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor :

540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 Tanggal 25 November 2013 tentang

Persetujuan Peningkatan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Eksplorasi Menjadi

Izin Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber Swarna

Kecamatan Petasia dan Soyo Jaya Kabupaten Morowali Utara Provinsi

Sulawesi Tengah. Selanjutnya perubahan kesatu atas keputusan Bupati

Morowali Nomor : 540.3/ SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan

Penyesuaian Kuasa Pertambangan Eksploitasi menjadi Izin Usaha

Pertambangan Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama,

sesuai Keputusan Gubernur Sulawesi Tengah Nomor : 540/456/IUP-

PR/DPMPTSP/2019 Tanggal 19 September 2019 tentang Perubahan

Komposisi Perubahan saham dan susunan direksi PT. Sumber Swarna

Selaku pemegang Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) Operasi Produksi,

PT Sumber Swarna Pratama tentunya selalu berpedoman terhadap

peraturan dan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, salah satunya adalah

yang merupakan pedoman khusus untuk pelaksanaan kegiatan kerja

(working activity) dan anggaran biaya (budget) Operasi Produksi secara

teknis dalam jangka waktu satu tahun kedepan.

Adapun rangkaian kegiatan penambangan yang dimaksud

meliputi : Pembersihan lahan (Clearing), Pengupasan Tanah

Penutup (Over Burden), Penambangan, Pengangkutan dan

Pemuatan serta Pengapalan/penjualan.

Akhirnya, kami mengucapkan terima kasih kepada semua

pihak yang telah membantu baik secara langsung maupun tidak

langsung dalam penyusunan dan perbaikan dokumen Rencana

Kerja dan Anggaran Biaya (RKAB) Tahun 2020 ini.

Kolonodale, Desember 2019

KATA PENGANTAR ....................................................................................... i

BAB I PENDAHULUAN .......................................................................

1.1 Latar Belakang ................................................................................ 1

BAB II PERSETUJUAN DAN REALISASI RKAB TAHUN 2019 SERTA

2.1 Kegiatan Eksplorasi………….………………………………………… 13

BAB III RENCANA STRATEGIS LIMA TAHUN

3.1 Kegiatan Eksplorasi......................................................................... 83

3.3 Pemasaran ...................................................................................... 84

1.1 Koordinat IUP Operasi Produksi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama…… 5

2.14 Rencana & Realisasi Elevasi Kedalaman Tambang ....................... 34

2.31 Rencana & Realisasi Reklamasi Tahun 2019 dan Rencana

2.45 Rekomendasi Penerbitan / Perubahan Angka Pengenal Importir

Gambar 1.1 Struktur Organisasi PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama .............................. 4

Lampiran 1 Peta Topografi

1. PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama akan melakukan pemasangan tanda batas

1.1 LATAR BELAKANG

PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama merupakan perusahaan pemegang Izin

Usaha Pertambangan Operasi Produksi (IUP OP) pertambangan nikel

yang terletak di Desa Ganda-Ganda dan Tamainusi Kecamatan

Petasia dan Soyo Jaya, Kabupaten Morowali Utara, Provinsi Sulawesi

Tengah, berdasarkan Keputusan Bupati Morowali, Nomor :

540.3/SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan Penyesuaian

Kuasa Pertambangan Eksploitasi menjadi Izin Usaha Pertambangan

Operasi Produksi Kepada PT. Sumber Swarna Pratama tanggal 11

Juli 2011, dengan jangka waktu selama 20 tahun. Selanjutnya

perubahan kesatu atas keputusan Bupati Morowali Nomor : 540.3/

SK.001/DESDM/VII/2011 tentang Persetujuan Penyesuaian Kuasa