Anda di halaman 1dari 54

AUTOREGRESSIF, MOVING AVERAGE DAN MODEL BOX JENKINS

Koefisien Autokorelasi
Koefisien Autokovariance
Koefisien autokovariance dipakai untuk mengukur asosiasi antara suatu data time series
dengan waktu sebelumnya.
n−k
1
γ k = ∑ ( Z t −Z )(Z t +k −Z ¿ )¿
n t=1
n
γ 0=∑ ¿ ¿=144
t =1
n−1
γ 1=∑ (Z t −Z)( Z t−1−Z ¿)¿=-27
t =1
n−2
γ 2=∑ (Z t −Z)( Z t−2−Z ¿ )¿ =-29
t =1
n −3
γ 3=∑ (Zt −Z)( Z t−3−Z ¿ )¿ =26
t =1
n−3
γ 4 =∑ (Z t −Z )(Z t −4−Z ¿ )¿ =-19
t=1

Sifat-sifat autokovariance

1. |γ k|≤ γ 0 dimana |γ k|≤ 1


2. γ k =−γ k dan ρk =−ρk
Autokorelasi (ACF)
γ −27
ρ1= 1 = =−0.18
γ 0 144
γ 1 −27
ρ1= = =−0.188
γ 0 144
γ 2 −29
ρ 2= = =−0.201
γ 0 144
γ 3 26
ρ3= = =0.181
γ 0 144
γ 4 −19
ρ4 = = =−0.13194
γ 0 144
γ
ρk = k
γ0
γ 1 −27
ρ1= = =−0.18
γ 0 144
ρ1=−0.188
ρ2=−0.201
ρ3=0.181
ρ4 =−0.13194
Koefisien Korelasi Partial (PACF)
Autokorelasi partial digunakan untuk mengukur tingkat keeratan (association) antara Zt dengan
Zt-k , apabila pengaruh dari time lag 1,2,3 ……. sampai dengan k -1 dianggap terpisah.
ϕ 11 =ρ 1=-0.1875

2
ρ2−ρ1
ϕ 22 = 2 =−0.201−¿ ¿=-0.245
1−ρ1

ϕ 21 =ϕ11−ϕ 22 ϕ 11= -0.188-(-0.245)* -0.188=-0.234

ρ 3−ϕ 21 ρ 2−ϕ22 ρ 1 0.181−0.234∗(−0.201 ) −(−0.234 )∗(−0.188)


ϕ 33 = = =0.097
1−ϕ 21 ρ1−ϕ22 ρ2 1−0.234∗(−0.188)−(−0.234)∗(−0.201)

Pengujian Koefisien Autokorelasi


Pengujian secara partial
H o : ρk =0
H 1 : ρk ≠ 0
ρ
t= k
s e(r )


k

k
1+2 ∑ r 2j
j=1
se(r )=
k
T
Bandingkan dengan t α/ 2(df =T−1)
Dimana:
se(r ) : standard error autokorelasi pada saat lag k
k

rj ; Koefisien autokorelasi pad saat lag ke-j


k : time lag
T : banyak observasi dalam data time series
ρ1=−0.188
ρ2=−0.201
γ3
ρ3= =0.181
γ0
T = 10
H o : ρ2=0
H o : ρ2 ≠ 0

2
1+2 ∑ r 2j
se(r )= j=1
=√ 1+2¿ ¿ ¿
2
T
se(r )=0.328
2

ρk −0.201
t= = =−0.613
s e(r ) 0.328
k

Misalkan digunakan taraf nyata 1%


t 0.005(df =9) =3.25
Keputusan:
Kesimpulan :
Pengujian secara bersama-sama
H o : ρ1=…=ρk =0  koefisien autokorelasi sampai dengan lag-k dapat dianggap sama
dengan nol.
H 1 : ρ1 ≠ … ≠ ρk ≠ 0  sekurang-kurangnya ada 1 koefisien autokorelasi sampai dengan lag-k
tidak sama dengan nol.
Statistik Q Box- Pierce (Portmanteau Test)
k
Q(k)=T ∑ r 2i ≈ χ 2df =k
j=1
Atau
k
Q( k)=n ∑ r i ≈ χ df =k
2 2

j =1
k = panjang lag
2
Tolak Ho jika Q> χ α (df =n)
Ljung and Box (LB)
ρ2k
( )
m
LB=n(n+2) ∑
2
χ df =m
k=1 n−k
Masalah Stationer
Stasioneritas berarti bahwa tidak terdapat perubahan yang drastis pada data. Fluktuasi data
berada di sekitar suatu nilai rata-rata yang konstan, tidak tergantung pada waktu dan variansi
dari fluktuasi tersebut (Makridakis, 1995). Data time series dikatakan stasioner jika rata-rata
dan variansinya konstan, tidak ada unsur trend dalam data, dan tidak ada unsur musiman.
Suatu data time series bersifat stationer apabila proses stochastic yang menjadi dasar dari seri
tidak berubah seiring dengan waktu.
Lebih lanjut, Widarjono (2013) menyatakan bahwa suatu dikatakan stationer, jika memenuhi 3
(tiga) kriteria yaitu : rata-rata dan varian konstan sepanjang waktu dank ovarian antara dua data
runtun waktu hanya tergantung kelambanan antara 2 periode waktu tersebut. Secara statistic
dinyatakan sebagai berikut:
E ( Z t )=μ artinya rata-rata dari Yt konstan sepanjang waktu
Var ( Z t )=E ¿ artinya varian dari Yt konstan sepanjang waktu
γ k =E (Z t −μ)(Z t +k −μ) kovarian
Persamaan terakhir menunjukan bahwa kovarian γ k pada kelambanan (lag) k adalah kovarian
antara Zt dan YZt+k.. Jika nilai k = 0, maka nilai kovarian ( γ 0) akan sama dengan varian dari Zt.
Jika k= 1, maka γ 1 merupakan kovarian natara dua nilai Yt yang berurutan.
Misalkan kita bergerak dari data time series Z1 sampai Zt bergerak menuju Zt+m, , jika data time
series tersebut stationer, maka nilai rata-rata,varian dan kovarian dari data sebelumnya harus
tetap sepanjang waktu.
Penggunaan data yang tidak stationer akan menyebabkan spurious regression dan spurious
correlation. Menurut Ender (2004,171) spurious regression adalah melakukan pemodelan
terhadap sebuah variable dependen dengan menggunakan variable independen sementara
sebenarnya variable independent tersebut tidak memberikan pengaruh apapun terhadap variable
dependent tersebut. Spurious regression akan memberikan nilai R2 yang tinggi dan t statistic
yang terlihat signifikan., namun tidak memberikan arti ekonomi apapun.
Pengujian stationeritas data dilakukan untuk menentukan apakah data time series memiliki
kecenderungan mean dan variance yang konstan.
Stasioneritas dibagi menjadi dua (Wei, 2006) yaitu sebagai berikut.
Stasioner dalam mean
Stasioner dalam mean adalah fluktuasi data berada di sekitar suatu nilai rata- rata yang konstan,
tidak tergantung pada waktu dan variansi dari fluktuasi tersebut. Dari bentuk plot data seringkali
dapat diketahui bahwa data tersebut stasioner atau tidak stasioner. Apabila dilihat dari plot ACF,
maka nilai-nilai autokorelasi dari data stasioner akan turun menuju nol sesudah time lag (selisih
waktu) kedua atau ketiga. Apabila data tidak stasioner, maka perlu dilakukan transformasi untuk
menghasilkan data yang stasioner.
Stasioner dalam varian
Suatu data time series dikatakan stasioner dalam varian apabila struktur data dari waktu ke waktu
mempunyai fluktuasi data yang tetap atau konstan dan tidak berubah-ubah. Secara visual untuk
melihat hal tersebut dapat dibantu dengan menggunakan plot time series, yaitu dengan melihat
fluktuasi data dari waktu ke waktu.
Uji Stationer
1. Correlogram
Menurut Bartlett, suatu data time series, dikatakan bersifat random sehingga bersifat stationer,
maka koefisien SACF (Sample Autocorrelation Function), akan mengikuti distribusi normal
1
dengan rata-rata nol dan variance (Se2) = . Secara statistic, ditulis :
n
1
n
ρk

ρk N (0 , ), sehingga diperoleh se = 1
n
Sehingga t=
se
ρ
Jika k signifikan, menunjukkan bahwa data tidak stationer.
Uji Box dan Pierce atau Uji Q
Selain uji individual, Box dan Pierce mengembangkan suatu uji yang bias digunakan
secara serampak (simultan) pada suatu kelmbanan (lag) tertentu.
m
Q=n ∑ ρ2k
k=1
n = ukuran sampel dan m = panjangnya lag
Jika sampel besar, maka akan mengikuti distribusi Chi Square χ 2 dengan derajad bebas
(df) sebesar m. Hipotesis nol Ho untuk uji ini adalah semua nilai koefisien SACF sampai
kelambanan tertentu sama dengan nol, atau data stationer. Sebaliknya, data dianggap tidak
stationer, jika nilai Q lebih besar dari χ 2 (df =m) .
Uji Ljung-Bo atau Uji LB
Adapun formula dari Uji Ljung-Box adalah :
ρ2k
( )
m
LB=n(n+2) ∑
2
χ df =m
k=1 n−k
Jika sampel besar, maka akan mengikuti distribusi Chi Square χ 2 dengan derajad bebas
(df) sebesar m. Hipotesis nol Ho untuk uji ini adalah semua nilai koefisien SACF sampai
kelambanan tertentu sama dengan nol, atau data stationer. Sebaliknya, data dianggap tidak
stationer, jika nilai Q lebih besar dari χ 2 (df =m) .
Uji Akar Unit (Unit Root Test)
Uji akar unit sering dipergunakan untuk menguji masalah stationeritas. Uji ini pertamakali
dikembangkan oleh Dickey-Fuller, sehingga dikenal dengan Uji akar unit Dickey-Fuller.
Ide dasar uji akar unit, dapat dijelaskan sebagai berikut :
Y t =ρ Y t−1 +ε t
Dimana ε t bersifat random atau stokastik dengan rata-rata sama dengan nol, varian yang konstan
dan tidak terjadi korelasi antara ε t dengan waktu sebelumnya (autokorelasi). Jika ε t memiliki
sifat tersebut dinamakan dengan white noise.
ε t bersifat white noise, yaitu : rata-rata sama dengan nol, varian yang konstan dan tidak terjadi
korelasi antara ε t dengan waktu sebelumnya (autokorelasi)
Jika kedua ruas, dikurangkan dengan Yt-1 maka persamaan menjadi
Y t −Y t −1 =ρY t−1−Y t −1+ ε t
∆ Y t =( ρ−1 ) Y t −1+ ε t
Disubsitusikan : ϕ =ρ−1,menjadi:
∆ Y t =ϕ Y t −1 + ε t
Hipotesis :
Ho: ϕ =0, ada masalah stationer/akar unit,namun masalahnya adalah ε t tidak berdistribusi normal.
Karena itu, DF mengembangkan suatu distribusi yang dinamakan distribusi Mackinnon,
sedangkan ujinya adalah τ (baca : tau).
Lebih lanjut, menyatakan bahwa terdapat 3 model regresi untuk menguji akar unit, yaitu :
Model 1
∆ Y t =a1 Y t −1+ ε t
Model 2
∆ Y t =ao +a1 Y t−1 + ε t
Model 3
∆ Y t =ao +a1 Y t−1 +a 2 t +ε t
Dengan ε t WN ( 0 , σ 2 ) . Jika terima Ho, maka a 1 = 1, menunjukkan bahwa data terdapat akar unit
atau tidak stationer, sebaliknya jika |a 1∨¿ 1 maka data tidak memiliki akar unit atau stationer.

Model 1
∆ Y t =a1 Y t −1+ ε t
Cara 1
t=(n−1)× a1
Tolak Ho, jika | t | > tabel
Artinya data stationer
Gunakan F(a)
Cara 2
a1−1
t=
Sa1

Tolak Ho, jika | t | > tabel


Artinya data stationer
Gunakan G(a)
Contoh :

Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)


Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:20
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 3/13/2019
Included observations: 310 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RAALI(-1) -0.985428 0.056877 -17.32566 0.0000

R-squared 0.492758    Mean dependent var -0.005673


Adjusted R-squared 0.492758    S.D. dependent var 2.957982
S.E. of regression 2.106703    Akaike info criterion 4.331346
Sum squared resid 1371.403    Schwarz criterion 4.343400
Log likelihood -670.3587    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.336165
Durbin-Watson stat 1.987760

n = 310
a 1=−0.985428
(n -1)*a1 = (310 – 1)*−0.985428 = -304.497
Tabel F(a) dng n = 305 dan α =5% -8.0
|(n -1)*a1| > Tabel F(a) dng n = 305  Tolak Ho, data stationer

a 1=−0.985428; Sa =0.056877
1
a1−1
t= =−34.91
Sa
1

Tabel F(a) dng n = 305 dan α =5% -1.95


|t| > Tabel G(a) dng n = 305  Tolak Ho, data stationer

Model 2
∆ Y t =a0 +a1 Y t−1 +ε t
t=(n−1)× a1
Tolak Ho, jika | t | > tabel
Artinya data stationer
Gunakan F(b)
a −1
t= 1
Sa
1

Tolak Ho, jika | t | > tabel


Artinya data stationer
Gunakan G(b)

Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)


Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:30
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 3/13/2019
Included observations: 310 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

C 0.007093 0.119848 0.059182 0.9528


RAALI(-1) -0.985448 0.056970 -17.29774 0.0000

R-squared 0.492763    Mean dependent var -0.005673


Adjusted R-squared 0.491117    S.D. dependent var 2.957982
S.E. of regression 2.110108    Akaike info criterion 4.337786
Sum squared resid 1371.388    Schwarz criterion 4.361893
Log likelihood -670.3569    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.347423
F-statistic 299.2117    Durbin-Watson stat 1.987744
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

n = 310
a 1=−0.985448
(n -1)*a1 = (310 – 1)*−0.985442 = -299.57
Tabel F(a) dng n = 305 dan α =5% -13.9
|(n -1)*a1| > Tabel F(b) dng n = 305  Tolak Ho, data stationer

a 1=−0.985442; Sa =0.056970
1

a −1
t= 1 =−34.85
Sa1
Tabel F(a) dng n = 305 dan α =5% -2.88
|t| > Tabel G(b) dng n = 305  Tolak Ho, data stationer

Model 3
∆ Y t =ao +a1 Y t−1 +a 2 t +ε t
t=(n−1)× a1
Tolak Ho, jika | t | > tabel
Artinya data stationer
Gunakan F(c)
a −1
t= 1
Sa1

Tolak Ho, jika | t | > tabel


Artinya data stationer
Gunakan G(c)

Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)


Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:43
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 3/13/2019
Included observations: 310 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

C -0.034659 0.241818 -0.143326 0.8861


RAALI(-1) -0.985575 0.057062 -17.27189 0.0000
T 0.000267 0.001341 0.198891 0.8425

R-squared 0.492829    Mean dependent var -0.005673


Adjusted R-squared 0.489525    S.D. dependent var 2.957982
S.E. of regression 2.113406    Akaike info criterion 4.344109
Sum squared resid 1371.211    Schwarz criterion 4.380270
Log likelihood -670.3369    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.358565
F-statistic 149.1591    Durbin-Watson stat 1.987763
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

n = 310
a 1=−0.985575
(n -1)*a1 = (310 – 1)*−0.985442 = -299.57
Tabel F(a) dng n = 305 dan α =5% -13.9
|(n -1)*a1| > Tabel F(b) dng n = 305  Tolak Ho, data stationer

a 1=−0.985575; Sa =0.057062
1

a1−1
t= =−34.85
Sa 1

Tabel F(a) dng n = 305 dan α =5% -2.88


|t| > Tabel G(b) dng n = 305  Tolak Ho, data stationer

Uji akar unit Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF)


Tidak semua proses runtun waktu dapat direpresentasikan dengan baik dengan model AR(1)
seperti di atas. Jika Yt merupakan suatu autoregresif tingkat p, dengan p ≥ 1, Dickey dan Fuller
menambahkan tiga statistik-F untuk uji hipotesis gabungan (joint hypotesis) pada koefisien
koefisien model autoregresif yang terbentuk.
Uji akar-akar unit metode Dickey-Fuller untuk model autoregresif tingkat p dengan p ≥ 1 dikenal
sebagai uji dickey-Fuller Diperluas (Augmented Dickey-Fuller Tes).
Misalkan runtun waktu yt mengikuti model AR(p), p ≥ 1
2
Y t =a 0+ a1 Y t−1+ a2 Y t−2 +… … …+ a p Y t− p +ε t ; ε t WN (0 , σ )
Uji Philips-Perron (PP)
Uji PP memasukkan unsur adanya autokorelasi antara error term dengan memasukkan variable
independen berupa kelembanan (lag) differensiasi.
Model dari uji PP sama dengan uji DF:
∆ Y t =a1 Y t −1+ ε t
∆ Y t =ao +a1 Y t−1 + ε t
∆ Y t =ao +a1 Y t−1 +a 2 t +ε t

Dengan ε t WN ( 0 , σ 2 ) .

Model 1
Eviews :

a1
t=
sa
1

Null Hypothesis: RJII has a unit root


Exogenous: None
Lag Length: 2 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=20)
t-Statistic

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -16.28692


Test critical values: 1% level -2.567517
5% level -1.941173
10% level -1.616464

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RJII)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 09/04/21 Time: 21:48
Sample (adjusted): 1/08/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 906 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic

RJII(-1) -0.958597 0.058857 -16.28692


D(RJII(-1)) -0.023242 0.046440 -0.500486
D(RJII(-2)) -0.128232 0.032992 -3.886807

R-squared 0.511846    Mean dependent var


Adjusted R-squared 0.510765    S.D. dependent var
S.E. of regression 1.445755    Akaike info criterion
Sum squared resid 1887.457    Schwarz criterion
Log likelihood -1618.036    Hannan-Quinn criter.
Durbin-Watson stat 1.993975

Null Hypothesis: RJII has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Lag Length: 2 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=20)

t-Statistic

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -16.27981


Test critical values: 1% level -3.968211
5% level -3.414782
10% level -3.129555

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RJII)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 09/04/21 Time: 22:01
Sample (adjusted): 1/08/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 906 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic

RJII(-1) -0.959608 0.058945 -16.27981


D(RJII(-1)) -0.022567 0.046502 -0.485284
D(RJII(-2)) -0.127861 0.033031 -3.870968
C -0.031991 0.096566 -0.331286
@TREND("1/03/2018") 1.48E-05 0.000184 0.080550

R-squared 0.511999    Mean dependent var


Adjusted R-squared 0.509832    S.D. dependent var
S.E. of regression 1.447132    Akaike info criterion
Sum squared resid 1886.866    Schwarz criterion
Log likelihood -1617.894    Hannan-Quinn criter.
F-statistic 236.3268    Durbin-Watson stat
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Null Hypothesis: RAALI has a unit root


Exogenous: None
Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=20)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -27.04268  0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -2.567511
5% level -1.941172
10% level -1.616465

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:46
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 908 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RAALI(-1) -0.898827 0.033237 -27.04268 0.0000

R-squared 0.446376    Mean dependent var 0.008363


Adjusted R-squared 0.446376    S.D. dependent var 3.431454
S.E. of regression 2.553204    Akaike info criterion 4.713676
Sum squared resid 5912.599    Schwarz criterion 4.718975
Log likelihood -2139.009    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.715699
Durbin-Watson stat 1.976768

Model 2
Eviews :
a1
t=
sa
1

Null Hypothesis: RAALI has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=20)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -27.02771  0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.437330
5% level -2.864510
10% level -2.568405

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:48
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 908 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RAALI(-1) -0.898839 0.033256 -27.02771 0.0000


C -0.005134 0.084779 -0.060555 0.9517

R-squared 0.446379    Mean dependent var 0.008363


Adjusted R-squared 0.445767    S.D. dependent var 3.431454
S.E. of regression 2.554608    Akaike info criterion 4.715875
Sum squared resid 5912.575    Schwarz criterion 4.726472
Log likelihood -2139.007    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.719921
F-statistic 730.4972    Durbin-Watson stat 1.976754
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Model 3
Eviews :

a1
t=
sa
1

Null Hypothesis: RAALI has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Lag Length: 0 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=20)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -27.01197  0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.968188
5% level -3.414771
10% level -3.129549
*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:53
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 908 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RAALI(-1) -0.898833 0.033275 -27.01197 0.0000


C -0.009320 0.169790 -0.054894 0.9562
@TREND("1/03/2018") 9.21E-06 0.000324 0.028464 0.9773

R-squared 0.446379    Mean dependent var 0.008363


Adjusted R-squared 0.445156    S.D. dependent var 3.431454
S.E. of regression 2.556018    Akaike info criterion 4.718076
Sum squared resid 5912.570    Schwarz criterion 4.733973
Log likelihood -2139.007    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.724146
F-statistic 364.8462    Durbin-Watson stat 1.976768
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

PP
Model 1
Null Hypothesis: RAALI has a unit root
Exogenous: None
Bandwidth: 10 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel

Adj. t-Stat   Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -27.31676  0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -2.567511
5% level -1.941172
10% level -1.616465

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction)  6.511673


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel)  7.457881

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:54
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 908 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RAALI(-1) -0.898827 0.033237 -27.04268 0.0000


R-squared 0.446376    Mean dependent var 0.008363
Adjusted R-squared 0.446376    S.D. dependent var 3.431454
S.E. of regression 2.553204    Akaike info criterion 4.713676
Sum squared resid 5912.599    Schwarz criterion 4.718975
Log likelihood -2139.009    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.715699
Durbin-Watson stat 1.976768

Model 2

Null Hypothesis: RAALI has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 10 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel

Adj. t-Stat   Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -27.30266  0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.437330
5% level -2.864510
10% level -2.568405

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction)  6.511646


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel)  7.457409

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:55
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 908 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RAALI(-1) -0.898839 0.033256 -27.02771 0.0000


C -0.005134 0.084779 -0.060555 0.9517

R-squared 0.446379    Mean dependent var 0.008363


Adjusted R-squared 0.445767    S.D. dependent var 3.431454
S.E. of regression 2.554608    Akaike info criterion 4.715875
Sum squared resid 5912.575    Schwarz criterion 4.726472
Log likelihood -2139.007    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.719921
F-statistic 730.4972    Durbin-Watson stat 1.976754
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Model 3
Null Hypothesis: RAALI has a unit root
Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 10 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel
Adj. t-Stat   Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -27.28806  0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.968188
5% level -3.414771
10% level -3.129549

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction)  6.511641


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel)  7.457604

Phillips-Perron Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RAALI)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:56
Sample (adjusted): 1/04/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 908 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RAALI(-1) -0.898833 0.033275 -27.01197 0.0000


C -0.009320 0.169790 -0.054894 0.9562
@TREND("1/03/2018") 9.21E-06 0.000324 0.028464 0.9773

R-squared 0.446379    Mean dependent var 0.008363


Adjusted R-squared 0.445156    S.D. dependent var 3.431454
S.E. of regression 2.556018    Akaike info criterion 4.718076
Sum squared resid 5912.570    Schwarz criterion 4.733973
Log likelihood -2139.007    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.724146
F-statistic 364.8462    Durbin-Watson stat 1.976768
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin
Null Hypothesis: RAALI is stationary
Exogenous: Constant
Bandwidth: 11 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel

LM-Stat.

Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test statistic  0.034905


Asymptotic critical values*: 1% level  0.739000
5% level  0.463000
10% level  0.347000

*Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (1992, Table 1) 

Residual variance (no correction)  6.571920


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel)  9.176458
KPSS Test Equation
Dependent Variable: RAALI
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 21:57
Sample: 1/03/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 909

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

C -0.005600 0.085075 -0.065822 0.9475

R-squared 0.000000    Mean dependent var -0.005600


Adjusted R-squared 0.000000    S.D. dependent var 2.564987
S.E. of regression 2.564987    Akaike info criterion 4.722883
Sum squared resid 5973.875    Schwarz criterion 4.728177
Log likelihood -2145.550    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.724905
Durbin-Watson stat 1.787764

Model regresi :

RAALI c
a0
t=
sa
0

Null Hypothesis: RAALI is stationary


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Bandwidth: 11 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel

LM-Stat.

Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test statistic  0.035003


Asymptotic critical values*: 1% level  0.216000
5% level  0.146000
10% level  0.119000

*Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (1992, Table 1) 

Residual variance (no correction)  6.571918


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel)  9.176283

KPSS Test Equation


Dependent Variable: RAALI
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 22:02
Sample: 1/03/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 909

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  


C -0.003558 0.170104 -0.020915 0.9833
@TREND("1/03/2018") -4.50E-06 0.000324 -0.013866 0.9889

R-squared 0.000000    Mean dependent var -0.005600


Adjusted R-squared -0.001102    S.D. dependent var 2.564987
S.E. of regression 2.566400    Akaike info criterion 4.725083
Sum squared resid 5973.874    Schwarz criterion 4.735672
Log likelihood -2145.550    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.729126
F-statistic 0.000192    Durbin-Watson stat 1.787764
Prob(F-statistic) 0.988940

RAALI c t
Dependent Variable: RAALI
Method: Least Squares
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 22:03
Sample: 1/03/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 909

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

C -0.003553 0.170385 -0.020854 0.9834


T -4.50E-06 0.000324 -0.013866 0.9889

R-squared 0.000000    Mean dependent var -0.005600


Adjusted R-squared -0.001102    S.D. dependent var 2.564987
S.E. of regression 2.566400    Akaike info criterion 4.725083
Sum squared resid 5973.874    Schwarz criterion 4.735672
Log likelihood -2145.550    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.729126
F-statistic 0.000192    Durbin-Watson stat 1.787764
Prob(F-statistic) 0.988940

Model Autoregressif (AR)


Y t =θ0 +θ 1 Y t −1 +θ 2 Y t −2 + … … …..+θ k Y t −k +ε t
Model AR(1)
Y t =θ Y t−1 +e t
2
σe
γo = 2
1−θ
γ o =Var (Y )

Syarat stationer :
|θ∨¿ 1
θ × σ 2e
γ 1=θ γ o =
1−θ2
2
k σe
γ k =θ
1−θ 2
γk k
ρk = =θ
γo
Contoh :

Dependent Variable: RIHSG


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 08/30/21 Time: 22:20
Sample: 1/03/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 909
Convergence achieved after 21 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) 0.050540 0.017310 2.919667 0.0036


SIGMASQ 1.290925 0.024331 53.05726 0.0000

R-squared 0.002549    Mean dependent var 0.002946


Adjusted R-squared 0.001449    S.D. dependent var 1.138266
S.E. of regression 1.137441    Akaike info criterion 3.097640
Sum squared resid 1173.451    Schwarz criterion 3.108228
Log likelihood -1405.877    Hannan-Quinn criter. 3.101682
Durbin-Watson stat 1.990032

Inverted AR Roots       .05

θ=0.051
2
σ e =1.29
Diuji, apakah |θ|<1
H o :θ=1
H 1 :θ <1

θ−1
t=

Tolak Ho, jika t ←t α (df =n−k−1)
2
σ e =1.290925
σ 2e
γo =
1−θ2
2
σe 1.29
γo = 2
= 2
=1.29
1−θ 1−( 0.05 )
θ × σ 2e
γ 1=θ γ o = =0.05 ×1.29=0.0645
1−θ2
γ 1 0.0645
ρ1= = =0.05
γo 1.29
2
ρ2=θ =¿(0.05 ¿2=¿

AR(2)

Y t =θ1 Y t−1 +θ2 Y t−2 +e t

Syarat stationer :
θ1 +θ2 <1
θ2−θ1< 1
¿ θ2∨¿1

The Autocorrelation Function for the AR(2) Process: Yule-Walker equations


γ k =θ 1 γ k−1 +θ2 γ k−2
k=1
γ 1=θ 1 γ 0 +θ2 γ −1
γ 1=γ −1
γ 1=θ 1 γ 0 +θ2 γ 1
γ 1 (1−θ 2)=θ 1 γ 0
γ1 θ1
=
γ o 1−θ2
θ
ρ1= 1
1−θ 2
γ k =θ 1 γ k−1 +θ2 γ k−2
k=2
γ 2=θ 1 γ 1 +θ2 γ 0
θ2 γ 0=γ 2−θ 1 γ 1
γ2 γ1
θ2= −θ 1
γo γo
θ2= ρ2−θ1 ρ1
ρ2=θ 2+ θ1 ρ1
θ1
ρ2=θ 2+ θ1 ×
1−θ2
(1−θ2) θ1
ρ2=θ 2 +θ1 ×
(1−θ2) 1−θ2
(1−θ2 )× θ2 θ12
ρ2= +
(1−θ 2) 1−θ 2
2
( 1−θ2 ) θ 2+ θ1
ρ 2=
(1−θ2 )
Variance:

( )
2
1−θ2 σe
γo =
1+θ2 ( 1−θ 2) 2−θ21
Dependent Variable: RIHSG
Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 08/31/21 Time: 10:22
Sample: 1/03/2018 8/13/2021
Included observations: 909
Convergence achieved after 35 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) 0.054811 0.017821 3.075671 0.0022


AR(2) -0.083067 0.015929 -5.214886 0.0000
SIGMASQ 1.282003 0.025657 49.96706 0.0000

R-squared 0.009443    Mean dependent var 0.002946


Adjusted R-squared 0.007257    S.D. dependent var 1.138266
S.E. of regression 1.134129    Akaike info criterion 3.092919
Sum squared resid 1165.340    Schwarz criterion 3.108801
Log likelihood -1402.732    Hannan-Quinn criter. 3.098983
Durbin-Watson stat 1.977705

Inverted AR Roots  .03-.29i      .03+.29i

2
σ e =1.282003
θ1=¿0.054811
θ2=¿-0.083067

( )
2
1−θ2 σe
γo =
1+θ2 ( 1−θ 2) 2−θ21

γo = ( 1−(−0.083067) ) 1.282
1−0.083067 ( 1−(−0.083) ) −( 0.0548 ) 2 2

Moving Average Processes

The First-Order Moving Average Process (MA(1))

Y t =e t−θ et −1
E ( Y t )=0
γ o =Var (Y )
2 2
γ o =σ e (1+θ )
γ 1=−θ × σ 2e
γ1 −θ
ρ1= =
γ o (1+θ 2)
γ k = ρk =0
Untuk k ≥ 2

The Second-Order Moving Average Process (MA(2))


Y t =e t−θ1 et −1−θ2 et −2
2 2 2
γ o =Var ( Y t )=(1+θ1 +θ2 )σ e
2
γ 1=(−θ1 +θ1 θ2)σ e
2
γ 2=−θ 2 σ e

Diperoleh
−θ1 +θ1 θ 2
ρ1=
(1+θ 21+ θ22)
−θ2
ρ 2= 2 2
(1+θ 1+ θ2)
ρk =0 untuk k =3,4…..

Langkah 1

Uji Unit Root

Null Hypothesis: RTLKM has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Lag Length: 1 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=19)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -22.55800  0.0000


Test critical values: 1% level -3.439192
5% level -2.865332
10% level -2.568846

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation


Dependent Variable: D(RTLKM)
Method: Least Squares
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:06
Sample (adjusted): 4/05/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 721 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

RTLKM(-1) -1.190055 0.052755 -22.55800 0.0000


D(RTLKM(-1)) 0.161110 0.036882 4.368225 0.0000
C -0.015966 0.077857 -0.205069 0.8376

R-squared 0.524830    Mean dependent var -0.003459


Adjusted R-squared 0.523506    S.D. dependent var 3.028480
S.E. of regression 2.090515    Akaike info criterion 4.316850
Sum squared resid 3137.842    Schwarz criterion 4.335910
Log likelihood -1553.224    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.324208
F-statistic 396.5190    Durbin-Watson stat 1.975900
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 12:59


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.025 -0.025 0.4471 0.504


       *|. |        *|. | 2 -0.160 -0.160 19.058 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.073 0.066 22.950 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.029 -0.053 23.545 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.041 -0.020 24.747 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.024 -0.044 25.161 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.026 -0.033 25.658 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.054 0.046 27.829 0.001
       .|. |        *|. | 9 -0.059 -0.068 30.363 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.061 -0.048 33.085 0.000
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.035 -0.072 33.999 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.016 0.006 34.200 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.012 -0.003 34.299 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.050 -0.050 36.168 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.071 0.063 39.892 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.011 -0.019 39.978 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.038 -0.009 41.073 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.052 0.037 43.067 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.018 -0.025 43.305 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.007 0.018 43.340 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.012 -0.035 43.454 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.044 0.066 44.920 0.003
       .|* |        .|* | 23 0.093 0.079 51.404 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.016 0.012 51.605 0.001
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.106 -0.083 60.023 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.065 0.055 63.224 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 27 0.003 -0.006 63.231 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.062 -0.031 66.108 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.026 -0.025 66.622 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 30 0.007 -0.018 66.660 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.032 -0.042 67.437 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.035 -0.022 68.363 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.022 0.023 68.716 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 34 0.007 -0.009 68.753 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.032 0.028 69.530 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.008 -0.017 69.575 0.001

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:17
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 18 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

C -0.010080 0.069748 -0.144517 0.8851


AR(2) -0.159455 0.025908 -6.154700 0.0000
SIGMASQ 4.337584 0.138346 31.35312 0.0000

R-squared 0.025616    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.022916    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.087009    Akaike info criterion 4.313611
Sum squared resid 3144.749    Schwarz criterion 4.332588
Log likelihood -1560.684    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.320935
F-statistic 9.490303    Durbin-Watson stat 2.036126
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000085

Inverted AR Roots -.00+.40i     -.00-.40i

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob


       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.018 -0.018 0.2355
       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.010 -0.010 0.3034 0.582
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.066 0.066 3.4908 0.175
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.001 -0.018 27.261 0.128
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.045 0.065 28.792 0.119
       .|* |        .|. | 23 0.078 0.069 33.335 0.057
       .|. |        .|. | 24 0.001 0.011 33.335 0.075
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.096 -0.095 40.283 0.020
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.056 0.049 42.661 0.015
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.019 0.004 42.932 0.020
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.053 -0.041 45.045 0.016
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.032 -0.033 45.815 0.018
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.008 -0.015 45.862 0.024
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.035 -0.033 46.772 0.026
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.034 -0.021 47.650 0.028
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.022 0.033 48.031 0.034
       .|. |        .|. | 34 0.000 -0.008 48.031 0.044
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.038 0.026 49.106 0.045
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.009 -0.023 49.171 0.056

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.013 -0.013 0.1317


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.012 -0.012 0.2347
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.067 0.067 3.5121 0.061
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.063 -0.061 6.3759 0.041
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.035 -0.035 7.2844 0.063
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.027 -0.034 7.8039 0.099
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.041 -0.034 9.0182 0.108
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.044 0.043 10.413 0.108
       *|. |        *|. | 9 -0.072 -0.073 14.189 0.048
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.043 -0.045 15.574 0.049
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.050 -0.066 17.402 0.043
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.002 0.011 17.405 0.066
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.017 0.014 17.623 0.091
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.052 -0.055 19.635 0.074
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.067 0.055 22.982 0.042
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.003 -0.014 22.988 0.060
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.030 -0.020 23.679 0.071
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.053 0.035 25.772 0.057
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.030 -0.027 26.428 0.067
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.020 0.017 26.729 0.084
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.008 -0.025 26.777 0.110
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.049 0.068 28.609 0.096
       .|* |        .|. | 23 0.078 0.066 33.133 0.045
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.005 0.006 33.152 0.060
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.004 -0.005 33.164 0.078
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.058 0.054 35.709 0.059
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.032 -0.009 36.491 0.064
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.050 -0.051 38.360 0.056
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.033 -0.022 39.176 0.061
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.016 -0.016 39.371 0.075
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.038 -0.033 40.442 0.077
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.039 -0.022 41.602 0.077
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.028 0.030 42.201 0.086
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.001 0.001 42.203 0.107
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.030 0.028 42.880 0.116
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.007 -0.012 42.923 0.140

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:39
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 18 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.150893 0.025411 -5.938199 0.0000


AR(25) -0.094058 0.035152 -2.675743 0.0076
SIGMASQ 4.298122 0.135462 31.72943 0.0000

R-squared 0.034480    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.031806    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.077494    Akaike info criterion 4.304795
Sum squared resid 3116.139    Schwarz criterion 4.323772
Log likelihood -1557.488    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.312119
Durbin-Watson stat 2.026669

Inverted AR Roots  .90-.11i      .90+.11i    .84-.34i  .84+.34i


 .73+.54i      .73-.54i    .58-.71i  .58+.71i
 .38-.83i      .38+.83i    .17+.90i  .17-.90i
-.06-.92i     -.06+.92i   -.28-.87i -.28+.87i
-.48-.77i     -.48+.77i   -.66+.63i -.66-.63i
-.79+.44i     -.79-.44i   -.88+.23i -.88-.23i
     -.90

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:43
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 21 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.152552 0.025797 -5.913498 0.0000


AR(25) -0.093205 0.034911 -2.669839 0.0078
AR(9) -0.061707 0.029752 -2.074060 0.0384
SIGMASQ 4.280960 0.138944 30.81073 0.0000

R-squared 0.038335    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.034334    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.074780    Akaike info criterion 4.303610
Sum squared resid 3103.696    Schwarz criterion 4.328913
Log likelihood -1556.059    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.313375
Durbin-Watson stat 2.026644

Inverted AR Roots  .89+.12i      .89-.12i    .84+.34i  .84-.34i


 .73+.53i      .73-.53i    .57+.71i  .57-.71i
 .39-.83i      .39+.83i    .17-.89i  .17+.89i
-.06-.92i     -.06+.92i   -.27-.87i -.27+.87i
-.48-.77i     -.48+.77i   -.66+.63i -.66-.63i
-.79+.44i     -.79-.44i   -.87+.22i -.87-.22i
     -.91
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:45
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 3 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.013 -0.013 0.1323


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.016 -0.016 0.3150
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.066 0.066 3.5088
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.065 -0.063 6.5633 0.010
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.042 -0.042 7.8669 0.020
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.018 -0.025 8.0954 0.044
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.041 -0.035 9.3459 0.053
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.040 0.041 10.549 0.061
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.007 -0.010 10.588 0.102
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.046 -0.045 12.136 0.096
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.060 -0.074 14.792 0.063
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.005 0.004 14.808 0.096
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.019 0.024 15.064 0.130
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.050 -0.048 16.938 0.110
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.066 0.056 20.150 0.064
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.000 -0.013 20.150 0.092
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.024 -0.019 20.578 0.113
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.048 0.035 22.278 0.101
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.036 -0.027 23.269 0.107
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.016 0.021 23.472 0.135
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.008 -0.027 23.519 0.171
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.049 0.063 25.298 0.151
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.073 0.068 29.317 0.082
       .|. |        .|. | 24 0.000 0.005 29.317 0.107
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.005 -0.006 29.333 0.136
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.058 0.057 31.832 0.104
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.030 -0.012 32.496 0.115
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.051 -0.048 34.454 0.099
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.033 -0.026 35.294 0.105
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.015 -0.013 35.471 0.127
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.034 -0.036 36.359 0.134
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.036 -0.029 37.343 0.138
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.026 0.028 37.860 0.153
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.010 -0.005 37.933 0.183
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.033 0.025 38.786 0.190
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.007 -0.010 38.820 0.224

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:46
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 29 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.161745 0.026819 -6.031050 0.0000


AR(25) -0.092954 0.035257 -2.636448 0.0086
AR(9) -0.064269 0.029883 -2.150713 0.0318
AR(4) -0.057421 0.024847 -2.310996 0.0211
SIGMASQ 4.266453 0.138560 30.79140 0.0000

R-squared 0.041594    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.036270    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.072699    Akaike info criterion 4.303014
Sum squared resid 3093.178    Schwarz criterion 4.334642
Log likelihood -1554.842    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.315220
Durbin-Watson stat 2.021199

Inverted AR Roots  .89+.12i      .89-.12i    .84-.34i  .84+.34i


 .73-.54i      .73+.54i    .57+.71i  .57-.71i
 .39+.83i      .39-.83i    .17+.89i  .17-.89i
-.06+.91i     -.06-.91i   -.28+.87i -.28-.87i
-.49+.77i     -.49-.77i   -.66+.63i -.66-.63i
-.79-.45i     -.79+.45i   -.87-.22i -.87+.22i
     -.91

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:48


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 4 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.011 -0.011 0.0842


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.009 -0.009 0.1425
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.062 0.062 2.9828
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.007 -0.006 3.0158
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.043 -0.042 4.3728 0.037
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.030 -0.035 5.0368 0.081
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.042 -0.043 6.3260 0.097
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.039 0.043 7.4272 0.115
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.008 -0.004 7.4784 0.187
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.050 -0.047 9.3039 0.157
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.060 -0.070 11.921 0.103
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.006 0.000 11.949 0.154
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.014 0.021 12.098 0.208
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.051 -0.043 14.024 0.172
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.063 0.060 16.933 0.110
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.001 -0.012 16.934 0.152
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.023 -0.024 17.336 0.184
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.049 0.041 19.113 0.161
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.029 -0.026 19.755 0.182
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.018 0.022 19.986 0.221
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.010 -0.024 20.061 0.271
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.056 0.064 22.379 0.216
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.071 0.069 26.136 0.126
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.001 0.001 26.136 0.161
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.006 -0.007 26.165 0.200
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.059 0.052 28.810 0.150
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.029 -0.019 29.426 0.167
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.053 -0.049 31.555 0.138
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.039 -0.028 32.707 0.139
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.013 -0.017 32.840 0.167
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.032 -0.031 33.627 0.177
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.040 -0.026 34.867 0.174
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.025 0.030 35.326 0.194
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.012 -0.008 35.429 0.227
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.033 0.027 36.274 0.236
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.008 -0.008 36.327 0.274

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:55
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 31 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.159574 0.029735 -5.366620 0.0000


AR(25) -0.092986 0.035210 -2.640881 0.0084
AR(9) -0.065033 0.030254 -2.149578 0.0319
AR(4) -0.057809 0.024907 -2.320995 0.0206
AR(5) -0.031535 0.035837 -0.879943 0.3792
SIGMASQ 4.262037 0.138814 30.70333 0.0000

R-squared 0.042586    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.035928    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.073066    Akaike info criterion 4.304743
Sum squared resid 3089.977    Schwarz criterion 4.342698
Log likelihood -1554.469    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.319391
Durbin-Watson stat 2.023525

Inverted AR Roots  .89+.12i      .89-.12i    .84-.34i  .84+.34i


 .73+.54i      .73-.54i    .57+.71i  .57-.71i
 .39-.83i      .39+.83i    .17+.89i  .17-.89i
-.06-.91i     -.06+.91i   -.28+.88i -.28-.88i
-.48+.77i     -.48-.77i   -.66-.63i -.66+.63i
-.79+.45i     -.79-.45i   -.87-.22i -.87+.22i
     -.91

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:56


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 5 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.012 -0.012 0.1042


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.010 -0.010 0.1799
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.064 0.064 3.1638
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.007 -0.005 3.1962
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.013 -0.012 3.3269
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.033 -0.037 4.1048 0.043
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.047 -0.047 5.7136 0.057
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.041 0.041 6.9450 0.074
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.010 -0.006 7.0233 0.135
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.050 -0.044 8.8436 0.115
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.060 -0.069 11.530 0.073
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.005 0.001 11.546 0.117
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.017 0.021 11.762 0.162
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.054 -0.046 13.918 0.125
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.061 0.062 16.691 0.081
       .|. |        .|. | 16 -0.000 -0.010 16.691 0.117
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.021 -0.022 17.028 0.149
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.052 0.043 19.032 0.122
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.031 -0.025 19.735 0.139
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.019 0.019 20.010 0.172
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.008 -0.023 20.057 0.218
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.054 0.065 22.222 0.176
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.071 0.067 26.013 0.099
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.002 0.001 26.018 0.130
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.006 -0.008 26.047 0.164
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.058 0.052 28.606 0.124
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.028 -0.022 29.198 0.139
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.050 -0.051 31.116 0.120
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.040 -0.028 32.314 0.119
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.015 -0.018 32.493 0.144
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.031 -0.033 33.202 0.156
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.040 -0.023 34.429 0.154
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.022 0.031 34.793 0.176
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.012 -0.007 34.907 0.208
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.034 0.028 35.772 0.216
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.010 -0.008 35.847 0.251

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:58
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 38 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.161266 0.030363 -5.311273 0.0000


AR(25) -0.093496 0.035238 -2.653269 0.0081
AR(9) -0.062557 0.030122 -2.076782 0.0382
AR(4) -0.063814 0.025085 -2.543872 0.0112
AR(5) -0.032376 0.036100 -0.896854 0.3701
AR(6) -0.035750 0.031783 -1.124837 0.2610
SIGMASQ 4.256482 0.143212 29.72161 0.0000

R-squared 0.043834    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.035844    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.073157    Akaike info criterion 4.306215
Sum squared resid 3085.950    Schwarz criterion 4.350495
Log likelihood -1554.003    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.323304
Durbin-Watson stat 2.025264

Inverted AR Roots  .89+.12i      .89-.12i    .84-.34i  .84+.34i


 .73+.54i      .73-.54i    .58+.71i  .58-.71i
 .39+.83i      .39-.83i    .17-.89i  .17+.89i
-.06+.92i     -.06-.92i   -.27+.88i -.27-.88i
-.48-.77i     -.48+.77i   -.66+.63i -.66-.63i
-.79-.45i     -.79+.45i   -.87+.23i -.87-.23i
     -.90

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 13:59


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 6 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.013 -0.013 0.1217


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.007 -0.007 0.1547
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.066 0.066 3.3442
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.003 -0.001 3.3494
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.016 -0.015 3.5298
       .|. |        .|. | 6 0.002 -0.003 3.5324
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.047 -0.048 5.1834 0.023
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.033 0.034 5.9611 0.051
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.009 -0.009 6.0194 0.111
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.051 -0.046 7.9729 0.093
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.063 -0.069 10.879 0.054
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.006 0.003 10.902 0.091
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.014 0.021 11.050 0.136
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.052 -0.046 13.075 0.109
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.058 0.059 15.575 0.076
       .|. |        .|. | 16 -0.000 -0.006 15.575 0.112
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.020 -0.017 15.864 0.146
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.052 0.043 17.901 0.119
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.029 -0.026 18.528 0.138
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.021 0.023 18.846 0.171
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.006 -0.025 18.878 0.219
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.053 0.063 21.006 0.178
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.068 0.067 24.520 0.106
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.001 -0.001 24.520 0.139
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.008 -0.008 24.567 0.175
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.057 0.050 27.059 0.134
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.028 -0.021 27.644 0.151
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.049 -0.053 29.485 0.132
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.037 -0.030 30.498 0.136
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.016 -0.018 30.701 0.163
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.034 -0.035 31.601 0.170
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.039 -0.026 32.768 0.169
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.022 0.034 33.146 0.192
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.014 -0.004 33.295 0.225
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.032 0.028 34.055 0.237
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.011 -0.008 34.148 0.275
Dependent Variable: RTLKM
Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:01
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 48 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.162531 0.031186 -5.211739 0.0000


AR(25) -0.090568 0.035447 -2.555041 0.0108
AR(9) -0.069304 0.031225 -2.219500 0.0268
AR(4) -0.061595 0.025747 -2.392320 0.0170
AR(5) -0.039142 0.036589 -1.069757 0.2851
AR(6) -0.036258 0.032981 -1.099379 0.2720
AR(7) -0.041047 0.033243 -1.234764 0.2173
SIGMASQ 4.249485 0.144864 29.33430 0.0000

R-squared 0.045406    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.036086    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.072896    Akaike info criterion 4.307333
Sum squared resid 3080.877    Schwarz criterion 4.357939
Log likelihood -1553.408    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.326863
Durbin-Watson stat 2.022807

Inverted AR Roots  .88-.12i      .88+.12i    .84-.35i  .84+.35i


 .73-.54i      .73+.54i    .57+.71i  .57-.71i
 .39-.83i      .39+.83i    .17-.89i  .17+.89i
-.06+.92i     -.06-.92i   -.27-.87i -.27+.87i
-.49+.77i     -.49-.77i   -.66+.63i -.66-.63i
-.78-.45i     -.78+.45i   -.87-.22i -.87+.22i
     -.91

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:02


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 7 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.012 -0.012 0.1000


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.006 -0.006 0.1255
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.065 0.064 3.1629
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.005 -0.004 3.1832
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.009 -0.009 3.2440
       .|. |        .|. | 6 0.002 -0.002 3.2478
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.011 -0.010 3.3290
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.034 0.036 4.2027 0.040
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.010 -0.010 4.2777 0.118
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.050 -0.049 6.1359 0.105
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.064 -0.070 9.1425 0.058
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.002 0.001 9.1444 0.103
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.015 0.022 9.3062 0.157
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.055 -0.047 11.572 0.116
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.062 0.060 14.422 0.071
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.000 -0.004 14.422 0.108
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.021 -0.014 14.762 0.141
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.051 0.046 16.708 0.117
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.028 -0.024 17.286 0.139
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.021 0.021 17.616 0.173
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.009 -0.025 17.678 0.222
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.054 0.059 19.838 0.178
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.069 0.066 23.376 0.104
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.003 -0.002 23.384 0.137
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.009 -0.014 23.451 0.174
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.057 0.052 25.890 0.133
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.027 -0.022 26.458 0.151
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.048 -0.051 28.177 0.135
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.035 -0.032 29.121 0.141
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.014 -0.020 29.263 0.172
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.035 -0.037 30.205 0.178
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.043 -0.029 31.588 0.170
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.025 0.033 32.055 0.191
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.016 -0.003 32.255 0.223
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.029 0.029 32.886 0.240
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.014 -0.008 33.025 0.277

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:04
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 46 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.160831 0.031109 -5.169967 0.0000


AR(25) -0.089230 0.035537 -2.510899 0.0123
AR(9) -0.068421 0.030989 -2.207875 0.0276
AR(4) -0.059087 0.025663 -2.302388 0.0216
AR(5) -0.041804 0.036551 -1.143743 0.2531
AR(6) -0.029162 0.033018 -0.883230 0.3774
AR(7) -0.040004 0.033267 -1.202503 0.2296
AR(8) 0.041131 0.029815 1.379522 0.1682
SIGMASQ 4.242244 0.147553 28.75064 0.0000

R-squared 0.047032    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.036385    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.072575    Akaike info criterion 4.308397
Sum squared resid 3075.627    Schwarz criterion 4.365328
Log likelihood -1552.794    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.330368
Durbin-Watson stat 2.023199

Inverted AR Roots  .89+.12i      .89-.12i    .84+.34i  .84-.34i


 .73+.54i      .73-.54i    .58-.71i  .58+.71i
 .39-.82i      .39+.82i    .16-.89i  .16+.89i
-.06+.92i     -.06-.92i   -.27+.87i -.27-.87i
-.49+.77i     -.49-.77i   -.66-.64i -.66+.64i
-.78-.45i     -.78+.45i   -.87-.22i -.87+.22i
     -.91

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:06


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 8 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.012 -0.012 0.1038


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.006 -0.006 0.1265
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.067 0.067 3.4235
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.008 -0.006 3.4674
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.009 -0.008 3.5229
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.002 -0.007 3.5256
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.013 -0.013 3.6552
       .|. |        .|. | 8 -0.004 -0.003 3.6660
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.010 -0.010 3.7430 0.053
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.045 -0.043 5.2070 0.074
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.065 -0.066 8.2837 0.040
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.003 0.001 8.2884 0.082
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.019 0.024 8.5553 0.128
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.058 -0.050 11.015 0.088
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.061 0.059 13.812 0.055
       .|. |        .|. | 16 -0.002 -0.005 13.813 0.087
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.019 -0.013 14.084 0.119
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.052 0.042 16.076 0.097
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.026 -0.027 16.597 0.120
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.023 0.023 16.984 0.150
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.009 -0.022 17.042 0.197
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.055 0.058 19.331 0.153
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.069 0.069 22.860 0.087
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.003 -0.000 22.867 0.117
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.010 -0.017 22.939 0.151
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.055 0.054 25.245 0.118
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.028 -0.024 25.825 0.135
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.048 -0.050 27.542 0.121
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.036 -0.033 28.520 0.126
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.015 -0.016 28.683 0.154
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.038 -0.034 29.785 0.156
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.043 -0.029 31.178 0.149
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.030 0.036 31.877 0.162
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.017 -0.000 32.105 0.190
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.031 0.028 32.816 0.203
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.011 -0.011 32.902 0.239

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:07
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 44 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.165564 0.030962 -5.347409 0.0000


AR(25) -0.091581 0.035037 -2.613808 0.0091
AR(9) -0.080526 0.031247 -2.577097 0.0102
AR(4) -0.062244 0.025688 -2.423039 0.0156
AR(5) -0.044601 0.036283 -1.229256 0.2194
AR(6) -0.031251 0.033013 -0.946623 0.3442
AR(7) -0.044159 0.033446 -1.320300 0.1872
AR(8) 0.045685 0.030597 1.493108 0.1359
AR(11) -0.070822 0.031902 -2.219990 0.0267
SIGMASQ 4.220317 0.148710 28.37957 0.0000

R-squared 0.051958    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.040025    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.068657    Akaike info criterion 4.306102
Sum squared resid 3059.730    Schwarz criterion 4.369360
Log likelihood -1550.962    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.330515
Durbin-Watson stat 2.027795

Inverted AR Roots  .88-.13i      .88+.13i    .85-.34i  .85+.34i


 .73-.54i      .73+.54i    .58+.71i  .58-.71i
 .39+.82i      .39-.82i    .16+.90i  .16-.90i
-.05+.92i     -.05-.92i   -.28+.87i -.28-.87i
-.48-.77i     -.48+.77i   -.67+.63i -.67-.63i
-.78+.45i     -.78-.45i   -.86+.21i -.86-.21i
     -.92

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:09


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 9 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob


       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.014 -0.014 0.1445
       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.001 -0.001 0.1452
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.064 0.064 3.0984
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.001 0.001 3.0992
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.008 -0.008 3.1465
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.001 -0.005 3.1468
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.007 -0.007 3.1844
       .|. |        .|. | 8 -0.006 -0.005 3.2111
       .|. |        .|. | 9 0.002 0.002 3.2132
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.048 -0.047 4.8941 0.027
       .|. |        .|. | 11 0.007 0.007 4.9350 0.085
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.007 0.007 4.9688 0.174
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.007 0.013 5.0044 0.287
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.054 -0.055 7.1787 0.208
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.063 0.060 10.118 0.120
       .|. |        .|. | 16 -0.007 -0.007 10.158 0.180
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.022 -0.016 10.519 0.230
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.046 0.038 12.103 0.208
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.025 -0.024 12.563 0.249
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.016 0.017 12.757 0.310
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.016 -0.021 12.947 0.373
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.056 0.060 15.295 0.289
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.067 0.069 18.667 0.178
       .|. |        .|. | 24 0.002 -0.000 18.670 0.229
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.012 -0.012 18.770 0.281
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.060 0.051 21.498 0.205
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.029 -0.029 22.130 0.226
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.049 -0.048 23.945 0.198
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.032 -0.036 24.710 0.213
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.019 -0.017 24.970 0.248
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.039 -0.038 26.144 0.246
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.046 -0.031 27.719 0.227
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.034 0.033 28.586 0.236
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.014 -0.005 28.737 0.275
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.029 0.027 29.375 0.294
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.021 -0.016 29.717 0.327

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:10
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 43 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.163688 0.031263 -5.235890 0.0000


AR(25) -0.089193 0.035877 -2.486096 0.0131
AR(9) -0.081536 0.031537 -2.585454 0.0099
AR(4) -0.063884 0.025571 -2.498327 0.0127
AR(5) -0.045763 0.036383 -1.257821 0.2089
AR(6) -0.033753 0.033401 -1.010536 0.3126
AR(7) -0.041330 0.033900 -1.219154 0.2232
AR(8) 0.038217 0.030751 1.242763 0.2144
AR(11) -0.071534 0.031541 -2.267986 0.0236
AR(10) -0.045052 0.032814 -1.372927 0.1702
SIGMASQ 4.211580 0.148109 28.43569 0.0000

R-squared 0.053921    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.040670    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.067961    Akaike info criterion 4.306807
Sum squared resid 3053.396    Schwarz criterion 4.376391
Log likelihood -1550.218    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.333662
Durbin-Watson stat 2.028486

Inverted AR Roots  .88-.13i      .88+.13i    .85-.34i  .85+.34i


 .72-.53i      .72+.53i    .58+.72i  .58-.72i
 .39+.81i      .39-.81i    .16+.90i  .16-.90i
-.05+.92i     -.05-.92i   -.28+.87i -.28-.87i
-.48+.77i     -.48-.77i   -.66-.63i -.66+.63i
-.78+.45i     -.78-.45i   -.87+.22i -.87-.22i
     -.91

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:14


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 10 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.014 -0.014 0.1510


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.003 -0.003 0.1560
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.064 0.064 3.1093
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.002 0.000 3.1117
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.004 -0.004 3.1234
       .|. |        .|. | 6 0.001 -0.003 3.1238
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.007 -0.007 3.1631
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.003 0.003 3.1685
       .|. |        .|. | 9 0.001 0.001 3.1689
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.004 -0.003 3.1831
       .|. |        .|. | 11 0.007 0.006 3.2163 0.073
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.002 0.002 3.2191 0.200
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.012 0.013 3.3275 0.344
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.056 -0.056 5.6221 0.229
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.060 0.059 8.3030 0.140
       .|. |        .|. | 16 -0.005 -0.005 8.3225 0.215
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.025 -0.018 8.7804 0.269
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.046 0.039 10.368 0.240
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.029 -0.028 10.998 0.276
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.012 0.015 11.111 0.349
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.019 -0.025 11.371 0.413
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.054 0.059 13.596 0.327
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.070 0.070 17.231 0.189
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.001 0.002 17.231 0.244
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.010 -0.015 17.309 0.301
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.060 0.050 20.063 0.217
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.029 -0.027 20.712 0.239
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.048 -0.051 22.451 0.213
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.032 -0.034 23.234 0.227
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.017 -0.017 23.464 0.267
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.040 -0.039 24.685 0.261
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.044 -0.035 26.174 0.244
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.034 0.028 27.066 0.253
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.014 -0.006 27.226 0.294
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.024 0.025 27.680 0.323
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.020 -0.019 27.976 0.360

Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.163688 0.031263 -5.235889 0.0000


AR(25) -0.089193 0.035877 -2.486096 0.0131
AR(9) -0.081536 0.031537 -2.585453 0.0099
AR(4) -0.063884 0.025571 -2.498326 0.0127
AR(5) -0.045763 0.036383 -1.257821 0.2089
AR(6) -0.033753 0.033401 -1.010535 0.3126
AR(7) -0.041330 0.033900 -1.219153 0.2232
AR(8) 0.038217 0.030751 1.242763 0.2144
AR(11) -0.071534 0.031541 -2.267985 0.0236
AR(10) -0.045052 0.032814 -1.372926 0.1702
SIGMASQ 4.211580 0.148109 28.43569 0.0000

R-squared 0.053921    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.040670    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.067961    Akaike info criterion 4.306807
Sum squared resid 3053.396    Schwarz criterion 4.376391
Log likelihood -1550.218    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.333662
Durbin-Watson stat 2.028486

Inverted AR Roots  .88-.13i      .88+.13i    .85-.34i  .85+.34i


 .72-.53i      .72+.53i    .58+.72i  .58-.72i
 .39+.81i      .39-.81i    .16+.90i  .16-.90i
-.05+.92i     -.05-.92i   -.28+.87i -.28-.87i
-.48+.77i     -.48-.77i   -.66-.63i -.66+.63i
-.78+.45i     -.78-.45i   -.87+.22i -.87-.22i
     -.91

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:20
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 33 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

C -0.008980 0.077897 -0.115276 0.9083


MA(1) -0.036053 0.025927 -1.390584 0.1648
SIGMASQ 4.447606 0.140640 31.62395 0.0000

R-squared 0.000900    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared -0.001867    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.113312    Akaike info criterion 4.338523
Sum squared resid 3224.515    Schwarz criterion 4.357500
Log likelihood -1569.714    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.345846
F-statistic 0.325349    Durbin-Watson stat 1.989085
Prob(F-statistic) 0.722381

Inverted MA Roots       .04

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:23


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 1 ARMA term

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 0.005 0.005 0.0220


       *|. |        *|. | 2 -0.157 -0.157 18.011 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.066 0.070 21.227 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.028 -0.056 21.788 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.042 -0.020 23.106 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.026 -0.045 23.612 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.025 -0.029 24.079 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.051 0.045 26.010 0.001
       .|. |        *|. | 9 -0.059 -0.071 28.581 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.064 -0.048 31.621 0.000
       .|. |        *|. | 11 -0.037 -0.070 32.626 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.016 0.009 32.805 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.010 -0.005 32.884 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.047 -0.048 34.552 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.070 0.064 38.146 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.012 -0.021 38.253 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.036 -0.007 39.224 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.050 0.036 41.063 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.016 -0.025 41.251 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.006 0.018 41.278 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.010 -0.033 41.360 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.047 0.070 43.024 0.003
       .|* |        .|* | 23 0.094 0.077 49.664 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.017 0.006 49.872 0.001
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.104 -0.081 58.018 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.061 0.058 60.864 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 27 0.003 -0.009 60.870 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.062 -0.032 63.821 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.028 -0.025 64.419 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 30 0.005 -0.019 64.436 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.033 -0.042 65.268 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.035 -0.020 66.212 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.021 0.024 66.535 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 34 0.009 -0.009 66.594 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.032 0.028 67.376 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.006 -0.017 67.408 0.001

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:36
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 33 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  


C -0.010147 0.066885 -0.151713 0.8795
MA(2) -0.175444 0.021747 -8.067457 0.0000
SIGMASQ 4.326271 0.138886 31.14973 0.0000

R-squared 0.028157    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.025465    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.084286    Akaike info criterion 4.311031
Sum squared resid 3136.547    Schwarz criterion 4.330009
Log likelihood -1559.749    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.318355
F-statistic 10.45909    Durbin-Watson stat 2.033266
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000033

Inverted MA Roots       .42          -.42

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:51
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 34 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

MA(2) -0.175381 0.021022 -8.342655 0.0000


SIGMASQ 4.326423 0.137935 31.36560 0.0000

R-squared 0.028123    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.026778    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.082880    Akaike info criterion 4.308308
Sum squared resid 3136.657    Schwarz criterion 4.320959
Log likelihood -1559.762    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.313190
Durbin-Watson stat 2.033209

Inverted MA Roots       .42          -.42

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:53


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 1 ARMA term
Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.017 -0.017 0.1996


       .|. |        .|. | 2 0.005 0.005 0.2170 0.641
       .|* |        .|. | 23 0.075 0.068 31.258 0.091
       .|. |        .|. | 24 0.002 0.008 31.260 0.117
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.096 -0.096 38.263 0.033
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.057 0.046 40.680 0.025
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.020 0.002 40.978 0.031
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.053 -0.043 43.114 0.025
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.035 -0.030 44.036 0.028
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.008 -0.016 44.081 0.036
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.034 -0.031 44.975 0.039
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.036 -0.020 45.954 0.041
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.022 0.035 46.314 0.049
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.001 -0.009 46.315 0.062
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.038 0.027 47.392 0.063
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.010 -0.023 47.476 0.078

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:56
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 35 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

MA(2) -0.172588 0.021070 -8.191091 0.0000


MA(25) -0.094449 0.032334 -2.921062 0.0036
SIGMASQ 4.283794 0.137890 31.06671 0.0000

R-squared 0.037699    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.035033    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.074028    Akaike info criterion 4.301505
Sum squared resid 3105.751    Schwarz criterion 4.320483
Log likelihood -1556.296    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.308829
Durbin-Watson stat 2.022968

Inverted MA Roots       .92      .89-.22i    .89+.22i  .80+.43i


 .80-.43i      .67-.62i    .67+.62i  .49+.76i
 .49-.76i      .28+.86i    .28-.86i  .06+.90i
 .06-.90i     -.17-.89i   -.17+.89i -.39+.82i
-.39-.82i     -.58-.70i   -.58+.70i -.74-.53i
-.74+.53i     -.85-.33i   -.85+.33i -.91+.11i
-.91-.11i

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 14:57


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 2 ARMA terms
Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 -0.012 -0.012 0.0968


       .|. |        .|. | 2 0.007 0.007 0.1306
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.063 0.064 3.0733 0.080
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.035 -0.033 3.9560 0.138
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.037 -0.039 4.9695 0.174
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.027 -0.032 5.5086 0.239
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.042 -0.038 6.8314 0.233
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.041 0.045 8.0868 0.232
       *|. |        *|. | 9 -0.073 -0.071 11.981 0.101
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.046 -0.047 13.513 0.095
       .|. |        .|. | 11 -0.050 -0.062 15.388 0.081
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.003 0.010 15.394 0.118
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.014 0.017 15.538 0.159
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.053 -0.055 17.606 0.128
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.064 0.055 20.669 0.080
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.001 -0.014 20.670 0.110
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.031 -0.025 21.400 0.125
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.051 0.037 23.333 0.105
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.027 -0.027 23.864 0.123
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.019 0.015 24.137 0.151
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.009 -0.024 24.198 0.189
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.050 0.064 26.059 0.164
       .|* |        .|. | 23 0.076 0.067 30.386 0.085
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.001 0.006 30.386 0.109
       .|. |        .|. | 25 -0.003 -0.006 30.394 0.138
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.058 0.049 32.888 0.106
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.001 0.018 32.890 0.134
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.051 -0.053 34.857 0.115
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.033 -0.021 35.688 0.122
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.015 -0.019 35.855 0.146
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.037 -0.029 36.899 0.149
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.040 -0.017 38.135 0.146
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.025 0.031 38.617 0.163
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.003 0.003 38.623 0.195
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.030 0.027 39.331 0.207
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.010 -0.009 39.413 0.241

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:00
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 59 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

C -0.008941 0.053453 -0.167270 0.8672


AR(1) 0.804926 0.077607 10.37183 0.0000
MA(1) -0.873017 0.062970 -13.86391 0.0000
SIGMASQ 4.393562 0.145927 30.10798 0.0000
R-squared 0.013041    Mean dependent var -0.008924
Adjusted R-squared 0.008934    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.101889    Akaike info criterion 4.329170
Sum squared resid 3185.333    Schwarz criterion 4.354473
Log likelihood -1565.324    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.338935
F-statistic 3.175538    Durbin-Watson stat 1.940530
Prob(F-statistic) 0.023644

Inverted AR Roots       .80


Inverted MA Roots       .87

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:02
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 60 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) 0.804535 0.077621 10.36498 0.0000


MA(1) -0.872629 0.063100 -13.82921 0.0000
SIGMASQ 4.393751 0.144843 30.33458 0.0000

R-squared 0.012998    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.010264    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.100478    Akaike info criterion 4.326454
Sum squared resid 3185.469    Schwarz criterion 4.345431
Log likelihood -1565.339    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.333778
Durbin-Watson stat 1.940443

Inverted AR Roots       .80


Inverted MA Roots       .87

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:03


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 2 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 0.030 0.030 0.6364


       *|. |        *|. | 2 -0.108 -0.109 9.0710
       .|* |        .|* | 3 0.104 0.112 16.951 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 4 0.001 -0.019 16.952 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.016 0.009 17.141 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.005 -0.019 17.161 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.011 -0.009 17.253 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.061 0.062 20.012 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.048 -0.055 21.700 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.052 -0.032 23.702 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 11 -0.029 -0.052 24.310 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.020 0.028 24.616 0.006
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.015 0.014 24.791 0.010
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.043 -0.033 26.135 0.010
       .|. |        .|* | 15 0.072 0.077 30.017 0.005
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.016 -0.010 30.204 0.007
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.031 0.000 30.908 0.009
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.053 0.042 33.037 0.007
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.012 -0.021 33.147 0.011
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.011 0.022 33.240 0.016
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.007 -0.030 33.277 0.022
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.046 0.069 34.852 0.021
       .|* |        .|. | 23 0.091 0.071 41.028 0.006
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.014 -0.003 41.185 0.008
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.101 -0.091 48.843 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.058 0.049 51.418 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.002 -0.017 51.420 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.064 -0.039 54.489 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.031 -0.029 55.206 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 30 0.000 -0.020 55.206 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.037 -0.040 56.230 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.038 -0.017 57.352 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.015 0.027 57.535 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 34 0.002 -0.008 57.538 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.026 0.027 58.058 0.005
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.011 -0.021 58.155 0.006

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 0.030 0.030 0.6364


       *|. |        *|. | 2 -0.108 -0.109 9.0710
       .|* |        .|* | 3 0.104 0.112 16.951 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 4 0.001 -0.019 16.952 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.016 0.009 17.141 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.005 -0.019 17.161 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.011 -0.009 17.253 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.061 0.062 20.012 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.048 -0.055 21.700 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.052 -0.032 23.702 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 11 -0.029 -0.052 24.310 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.020 0.028 24.616 0.006
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.015 0.014 24.791 0.010
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.043 -0.033 26.135 0.010
       .|. |        .|* | 15 0.072 0.077 30.017 0.005
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.016 -0.010 30.204 0.007
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.031 0.000 30.908 0.009
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.053 0.042 33.037 0.007
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.012 -0.021 33.147 0.011
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.011 0.022 33.240 0.016

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:08
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 68 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) 0.812793 0.071082 11.43451 0.0000


AR(15) 0.035104 0.017628 1.991351 0.0468
MA(1) -0.882068 0.058594 -15.05385 0.0000
SIGMASQ 4.377524 0.144658 30.26124 0.0000

R-squared 0.016644    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.012552    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.098049    Akaike info criterion 4.325580
Sum squared resid 3173.705    Schwarz criterion 4.350883
Log likelihood -1564.023    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.335345
Durbin-Watson stat 1.937712

Inverted AR Roots       .92      .81+.28i    .81-.28i  .59-.56i


 .59+.56i      .29+.74i    .29-.74i -.04+.78i
-.04-.78i     -.36+.68i   -.36-.68i -.61-.46i
-.61+.46i     -.74-.16i   -.74+.16i
Inverted MA Roots       .88

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:09
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence not achieved after 500 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) 0.873890 0.065374 13.36750 0.0000


AR(15) 0.099480 0.048549 2.049076 0.0408
MA(1) -0.942389 0.111930 -8.419426 0.0000
MA(15) -0.057380 0.033728 -1.701269 0.0893
SIGMASQ 4.345992 0.233593 18.60496 0.0000

R-squared 0.023727    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.018303    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.091930    Akaike info criterion 4.323302
Sum squared resid 3150.844    Schwarz criterion 4.354931
Log likelihood -1562.197    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.335508
Durbin-Watson stat 1.951582

Inverted AR Roots       .99      .87+.30i    .87-.30i  .64-.60i


 .64+.60i      .32+.79i    .32-.79i -.04+.83i
-.04-.83i     -.39+.73i   -.39-.73i -.65-.50i
-.65+.50i     -.80-.18i   -.80+.18i
Inverted MA Roots       1.00      .85-.27i    .85+.27i  .62+.57i
 .62-.57i      .31-.76i    .31+.76i -.04-.80i
-.04+.80i     -.37+.70i   -.37-.70i -.63-.48i
-.63+.48i     -.77-.17i   -.77+.17i

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:10


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 3 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 0.031 0.031 0.7012


       *|. |        *|. | 2 -0.106 -0.108 8.9662
       .|* |        .|* | 3 0.104 0.112 16.802
       .|. |        .|. | 4 0.004 -0.017 16.812 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.013 0.012 16.933 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.001 -0.014 16.933 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.010 -0.008 17.004 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 8 0.065 0.066 20.075 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.041 -0.050 21.327 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.045 -0.024 22.820 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 11 -0.025 -0.048 23.293 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.023 0.030 23.670 0.005
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.022 0.020 24.043 0.007
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.039 -0.030 25.157 0.009
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.041 0.046 26.409 0.009
       .|. |        .|. | 16 -0.010 -0.034 26.483 0.015
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.049 -0.024 28.258 0.013
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.035 0.026 29.155 0.015
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.027 -0.033 29.694 0.020
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.000 0.013 29.694 0.029
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.015 -0.037 29.856 0.039
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.041 0.063 31.086 0.040
       .|* |        .|. | 23 0.085 0.070 36.549 0.013
       .|. |        .|. | 24 -0.017 -0.006 36.778 0.018
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.101 -0.093 44.415 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.061 0.046 47.234 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 27 0.000 -0.018 47.234 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.063 -0.039 50.227 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.029 -0.031 50.886 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.001 -0.019 50.887 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.037 -0.040 51.938 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.038 -0.017 53.014 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.013 0.027 53.145 0.006
       .|. |        .|. | 34 0.000 -0.010 53.145 0.008
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.024 0.025 53.567 0.010
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.013 -0.023 53.693 0.013

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:14
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Failure to improve objective (non-zero gradients) after 66 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) -0.578061 0.091258 -6.334327 0.0000


AR(15) 0.049159 0.024066 2.042699 0.0414
AR(8) 0.443192 0.089858 4.932112 0.0000
MA(1) 0.649094 0.115980 5.596594 0.0000
MA(8) -0.350906 0.062933 -5.575884 0.0000
SIGMASQ 4.343213 0.159951 27.15333 0.0000

R-squared 0.024351    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.017566    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.092715    Akaike info criterion 4.325234
Sum squared resid 3148.829    Schwarz criterion 4.363188
Log likelihood -1561.897    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.339882
Durbin-Watson stat 2.139120

Inverted AR Roots       .87      .64+.30i    .64-.30i  .59-.65i


 .59+.65i      .17+.69i    .17-.69i -.08+.90i
-.08-.90i     -.44-.57i   -.44+.57i      -.73
-.74+.60i     -.74-.60i        -.99
Inverted MA Roots       .82      .56-.61i    .56+.61i -.07-.85i
-.07+.85i     -.72-.59i   -.72+.59i      -1.00

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:15


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 5 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       *|. |        *|. | 1 -0.070 -0.070 3.5316


       *|. |        *|. | 2 -0.119 -0.125 13.928
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.063 0.046 16.825
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.020 -0.027 17.107
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.050 -0.041 18.957
       .|. |        .|. | 6 0.008 -0.008 18.999 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.035 -0.044 19.889 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 8 -0.042 -0.045 21.209 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.015 -0.034 21.364 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.048 -0.063 23.077 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 11 -0.050 -0.064 24.901 0.000
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.023 -0.003 25.301 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.022 0.009 25.665 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.044 -0.043 27.093 0.001
       .|. |        .|. | 15 0.014 -0.002 27.246 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.005 -0.017 27.261 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.001 -0.004 27.262 0.007
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.040 0.027 28.430 0.008
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.018 -0.025 28.675 0.012
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.017 0.018 28.880 0.017
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.015 -0.029 29.041 0.024
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.053 0.055 31.108 0.019
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.059 0.067 33.747 0.014
       .|. |        .|. | 24 0.008 0.031 33.796 0.019
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.106 -0.096 42.219 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.062 0.052 45.134 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 27 0.004 -0.001 45.149 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.060 -0.030 47.883 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.021 -0.031 48.230 0.002
       .|. |        .|. | 30 0.002 -0.012 48.234 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.047 -0.040 49.914 0.003
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.017 -0.021 50.145 0.004
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.026 0.015 50.670 0.005
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.002 0.004 50.673 0.008
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.040 0.029 51.901 0.008
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.010 -0.022 51.975 0.011

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:19
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 33 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) -0.352013 0.122179 -2.881124 0.0041


AR(15) 0.069495 0.029079 2.389821 0.0171
AR(8) 0.212426 0.137115 1.549257 0.1218
AR(2) -0.167629 0.026845 -6.244320 0.0000
MA(1) 0.334698 0.125767 2.661262 0.0080
MA(8) -0.144647 0.144665 -0.999874 0.3177
SIGMASQ 4.265259 0.149022 28.62173 0.0000

R-squared 0.041863    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.033856    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.075293    Akaike info criterion 4.308079
Sum squared resid 3092.313    Schwarz criterion 4.352360
Log likelihood -1554.679    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.325168
Durbin-Watson stat 1.984212

Inverted AR Roots       .85      .70+.33i    .70-.33i  .57-.65i


 .57+.65i      .20-.76i    .20+.76i -.09-.89i
-.09+.89i     -.46-.68i   -.46+.68i -.68+.56i
-.68-.56i     -.84+.12i   -.84-.12i
Inverted MA Roots       .75      .52+.55i    .52-.55i -.04+.78i
-.04-.78i     -.60-.55i   -.60+.55i      -.84

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:21


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 6 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 0.008 0.008 0.0441


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.001 -0.001 0.0443
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.010 0.010 0.1146
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.032 -0.032 0.8552
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.042 -0.042 2.1731
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.013 -0.012 2.2909
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.046 -0.046 3.8780 0.049
       .|. |        .|. | 8 -0.024 -0.024 4.3185 0.115
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.044 -0.046 5.7186 0.126
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.024 -0.026 6.1482 0.188
       *|. |        *|. | 11 -0.068 -0.073 9.5859 0.088
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.006 0.001 9.6129 0.142
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.027 0.020 10.155 0.180
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.044 -0.052 11.578 0.171
       .|. |        .|. | 15 -0.007 -0.018 11.616 0.236
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.024 0.012 12.046 0.282
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.005 -0.009 12.062 0.359
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.049 0.039 13.866 0.309
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.028 -0.039 14.444 0.343
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.024 0.020 14.882 0.386
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.005 -0.012 14.903 0.458
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.061 0.060 17.657 0.344
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.061 0.062 20.466 0.251
       .|. |        .|. | 24 0.012 0.013 20.568 0.302
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.091 -0.095 26.868 0.108
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.051 0.055 28.863 0.090
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.017 0.000 29.089 0.112
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.046 -0.040 30.695 0.103
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.036 -0.033 31.702 0.107
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.014 -0.013 31.858 0.131
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.040 -0.030 33.057 0.130
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.026 -0.024 33.573 0.146
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.027 0.031 34.114 0.163
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.001 -0.005 34.114 0.197
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.042 0.032 35.448 0.190
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.006 -0.030 35.478 0.226

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:23
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 35 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) -0.355937 0.146863 -2.423606 0.0156


AR(15) 0.069513 0.029380 2.366005 0.0182
AR(8) 0.209616 0.139950 1.497784 0.1346
AR(2) -0.173049 0.142828 -1.211590 0.2261
MA(1) 0.338980 0.150400 2.253858 0.0245
MA(8) -0.141918 0.147267 -0.963683 0.3355
MA(2) 0.005652 0.143816 0.039299 0.9687
SIGMASQ 4.265253 0.149046 28.61696 0.0000
R-squared 0.041864    Mean dependent var -0.008924
Adjusted R-squared 0.032510    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.076739    Akaike info criterion 4.310837
Sum squared resid 3092.309    Schwarz criterion 4.361443
Log likelihood -1554.678    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.330367
Durbin-Watson stat 1.984775

Inverted AR Roots       .85      .70-.33i    .70+.33i  .56+.65i


 .56-.65i      .20+.77i    .20-.77i -.09-.89i
-.09+.89i     -.46+.68i   -.46-.68i -.68+.56i
-.68-.56i     -.84-.12i   -.84+.12i
Inverted MA Roots       .75      .52+.55i    .52-.55i -.04+.78i
-.04-.78i     -.60-.55i   -.60+.55i      -.83

Dependent Variable: RTLKM


Method: ARMA Maximum Likelihood (OPG - BHHH)
Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:24
Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Convergence achieved after 35 iterations
Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) -0.356279 0.122931 -2.898213 0.0039


AR(15) 0.076644 0.030551 2.508705 0.0123
AR(8) 0.198870 0.137274 1.448704 0.1479
AR(2) -0.168545 0.027491 -6.130855 0.0000
AR(7) -0.035868 0.031365 -1.143554 0.2532
MA(1) 0.337702 0.126424 2.671187 0.0077
MA(8) -0.142175 0.143710 -0.989322 0.3228
SIGMASQ 4.259529 0.152582 27.91639 0.0000

R-squared 0.043150    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.033808    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.075345    Akaike info criterion 4.309512
Sum squared resid 3088.159    Schwarz criterion 4.360118
Log likelihood -1554.198    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.329042
Durbin-Watson stat 1.984150

Inverted AR Roots       .84      .71+.34i    .71-.34i  .56+.65i


 .56-.65i      .20-.78i    .20+.78i -.09-.89i
-.09+.89i     -.47-.69i   -.47+.69i -.68+.56i
-.68-.56i     -.84+.12i   -.84-.12i
Inverted MA Roots       .75      .52+.55i    .52-.55i -.04+.78i
-.04-.78i     -.60-.55i   -.60+.55i      -.84

Date: 09/05/21 Time: 15:26


Sample: 4/03/2018 2/17/2021
Included observations: 725
Q-statistic probabilities adjusted for 7 ARMA terms

Autocorrelation Partial Correlation AC   PAC  Q-Stat  Prob

       .|. |        .|. | 1 0.008 0.008 0.0444


       .|. |        .|. | 2 -0.003 -0.003 0.0492
       .|. |        .|. | 3 0.007 0.007 0.0847
       .|. |        .|. | 4 -0.033 -0.034 0.9029
       .|. |        .|. | 5 -0.042 -0.042 2.2088
       .|. |        .|. | 6 -0.012 -0.011 2.3090
       .|. |        .|. | 7 -0.013 -0.012 2.4290
       .|. |        .|. | 8 -0.026 -0.027 2.9323 0.087
       .|. |        .|. | 9 -0.048 -0.051 4.6522 0.098
       .|. |        .|. | 10 -0.023 -0.025 5.0270 0.170
       *|. |        *|. | 11 -0.068 -0.070 8.4232 0.077
       .|. |        .|. | 12 0.003 0.001 8.4314 0.134
       .|. |        .|. | 13 0.027 0.021 8.9894 0.174
       .|. |        .|. | 14 -0.046 -0.053 10.561 0.159
       .|. |        .|. | 15 -0.006 -0.015 10.586 0.226
       .|. |        .|. | 16 0.025 0.016 11.069 0.271
       .|. |        .|. | 17 -0.006 -0.010 11.098 0.350
       .|. |        .|. | 18 0.044 0.038 12.560 0.323
       .|. |        .|. | 19 -0.026 -0.037 13.055 0.365
       .|. |        .|. | 20 0.025 0.018 13.518 0.409
       .|. |        .|. | 21 -0.008 -0.011 13.569 0.482
       .|. |        .|. | 22 0.062 0.061 16.426 0.354
       .|. |        .|. | 23 0.062 0.060 19.273 0.255
       .|. |        .|. | 24 0.009 0.011 19.340 0.309
       *|. |        *|. | 25 -0.091 -0.097 25.530 0.111
       .|. |        .|. | 26 0.051 0.058 27.511 0.093
       .|. |        .|. | 27 -0.017 -0.000 27.728 0.116
       .|. |        .|. | 28 -0.045 -0.039 29.234 0.109
       .|. |        .|. | 29 -0.035 -0.035 30.143 0.115
       .|. |        .|. | 30 -0.012 -0.014 30.249 0.142
       .|. |        .|. | 31 -0.041 -0.032 31.533 0.139
       .|. |        .|. | 32 -0.029 -0.021 32.182 0.153
       .|. |        .|. | 33 0.030 0.030 32.857 0.166
       .|. |        .|. | 34 -0.002 -0.006 32.860 0.202
       .|. |        .|. | 35 0.039 0.033 34.027 0.200
       .|. |        .|. | 36 -0.009 -0.030 34.083 0.236

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(2) -0.163688 0.031263 -5.235889 0.0000


AR(25) -0.089193 0.035877 -2.486096 0.0131
AR(9) -0.081536 0.031537 -2.585453 0.0099
AR(4) -0.063884 0.025571 -2.498326 0.0127
AR(5) -0.045763 0.036383 -1.257821 0.2089
AR(6) -0.033753 0.033401 -1.010535 0.3126
AR(7) -0.041330 0.033900 -1.219154 0.2232
AR(8) 0.038217 0.030751 1.242763 0.2144
AR(11) -0.071534 0.031541 -2.267985 0.0236
AR(10) -0.045052 0.032814 -1.372926 0.1702
SIGMASQ 4.211580 0.148109 28.43569 0.0000
R-squared 0.053921    Mean dependent var -0.008924
Adjusted R-squared 0.040670    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.067961    Akaike info criterion 4.306807
Sum squared resid 3053.396    Schwarz criterion 4.376391
Log likelihood -1550.218    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.333662
Durbin-Watson stat 2.028486

Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

MA(2) -0.172588 0.021070 -8.191091 0.0000


MA(25) -0.094449 0.032334 -2.921062 0.0036
SIGMASQ 4.283794 0.137890 31.06671 0.0000

R-squared 0.037699    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.035033    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.074028    Akaike info criterion 4.301505
Sum squared resid 3105.751    Schwarz criterion 4.320483
Log likelihood -1556.296    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.308829
Durbin-Watson stat 2.022968

Inverted MA Roots       .92      .89-.22i    .89+.22i  .80+.43i


 .80-.43i      .67-.62i    .67+.62i  .49+.76i
 .49-.76i      .28+.86i    .28-.86i  .06+.90i
 .06-.90i     -.17-.89i   -.17+.89i -.39+.82i
-.39-.82i     -.58-.70i   -.58+.70i -.74-.53i
-.74+.53i     -.85-.33i   -.85+.33i -.91+.11i
-.91-.11i

Coefficient covariance computed using outer product of gradients

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  

AR(1) -0.356279 0.122931 -2.898213 0.0039


AR(15) 0.076644 0.030551 2.508705 0.0123
AR(8) 0.198870 0.137274 1.448704 0.1479
AR(2) -0.168545 0.027491 -6.130855 0.0000
AR(7) -0.035868 0.031365 -1.143554 0.2532
MA(1) 0.337702 0.126424 2.671187 0.0077
MA(8) -0.142175 0.143710 -0.989322 0.3228
SIGMASQ 4.259529 0.152582 27.91639 0.0000

R-squared 0.043150    Mean dependent var -0.008924


Adjusted R-squared 0.033808    S.D. dependent var 2.111342
S.E. of regression 2.075345    Akaike info criterion 4.309512
Sum squared resid 3088.159    Schwarz criterion 4.360118
Log likelihood -1554.198    Hannan-Quinn criter. 4.329042
Durbin-Watson stat 1.984150
Model Adjusted R- Akaike info Schwarz Hannan-
squared criterion criterion Quinn criter.
AR 0.040670 4.306807 4.376391 4.333662
MA 0.035033 4.301505 4.320483 4.308829
ARMA 0.033808 4.309512 4.360118 4.329042

Lag Length: 2 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=19)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -0.842972  0.3506


Test critical values: 1% level -2.568156
5% level -1.941260
10% level -1.616406

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Null Hypothesis: UNVR has a unit root


Exogenous: None
Lag Length: 2 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=19)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -0.842972  0.3506


Test critical values: 1% level -2.568156
5% level -1.941260
10% level -1.616406

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Null Hypothesis: UNVR has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant
Lag Length: 2 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=19)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.265071  0.1838


Test critical values: 1% level -3.439142
5% level -2.865310
10% level -2.568834

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Null Hypothesis: UNVR has a unit root


Exogenous: Constant, Linear Trend
Lag Length: 2 (Automatic - based on SIC, maxlag=19)

t-Statistic   Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -2.983782  0.1375


Test critical values: 1% level -3.970761
5% level -3.416027
10% level -3.130293

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Null Hypothesis: UNVR has a unit root


Exogenous: None
Bandwidth: 19 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel

Adj. t-Stat   Prob.*

Phillips-Perron test statistic -0.930419  0.3134


Test critical values: 1% level -2.568147
5% level -1.941259
10% level -1.616406

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Residual variance (no correction)  22015.49


HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel)  11741.95

Anda mungkin juga menyukai