FORM H2.

xx (VERSI 01)

KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN – UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT – PROGRAM PASCASARJANA

PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER TEKNIK SIPIL 1/3
GEDUNG FAKULTAS TEKNIK KAMPUS UNLAM BANJARMASIN 70123 TELP. 0511-3304503 FAKS. 0511-3304503 EMAIL psmts@teknikunlam.ac.id; psmts@ft.unlam.ac.id
GARIS-GARIS BESAR PROGRAM PENGAJARAN
JUDUL MATA KULIAH: Teknologi Informasi KODE MATA KULIAH: H18202 JUMLAH SKS: 3

DOSEN:
1. Aqli Mursadin, S.T., M.T., Ph.D.*
2. Dr. Rony Riduan, S.T., M.T.
* koordinator
DESKRIPSI SINGKAT:
Topik-topik mata kuliah ini adalah sebagai berikut:
 Konsep-konsep dasar informasi dan pengenalan sistem-sistem yang terlibat;
 Aplikasi pengolah spreadsheet;
 Aplikasi pengolah dokumen;
 Aplikasi pengolah presentasi;
 Aplikasi pengolah database.

LEARNING OUTCOMES:
 Memahami dasar-dasar informasi, teknologi informasi, dan sistem-sistem yang terlibat;
 Mampu memanfaatkan aplikasi-aplikasi pengolah spreadsheet, pengolah dokumen, pengolah presentasi, dan pengolah database untuk keperluan belajar, penelitian dan pelaporan.

NO. KOMPETENSI POKOK BAHASAN SUB POKOK BAHASAN WAKTU REFERENSI

1. Memahami informasi dalam industri Informasi di dalam konstruksi Konsep-konsep informasi di dalam konstruksi.
3 × 50 menit 1
konstruksi
2. Informasi di dalam konstruksi Standard dan klasifikasi informasi di industri konstruksi.
3 × 50 menit 2
(lanjutan)
3. Memahami implementasi teknologi Implementasi teknologi informasi di  Kolaborasi, interoperability,
informasi di industri konstruksi industri konstruksi  Web-based project management, 3 × 50 menit 3
 Konsep-konsep knowledge management.
4. (Tugas Teori 1) 3 × 50 menit

5. Menguasai dasar-dasar pengolahan Aplikasi spreadsheet Dasar-dasar pengolahan spreadsheet:

spreadsheet  Pengenalan workspace,
 Pembuatan worksheet,
3 × 50 menit 5
 Penggunaan formula dan function,
 Pengolahan informasi,
 Visualisasi data.
6. (Tugas Aplikasi 1) 3 × 50 menit
7. Menguasai dasar-dasar pengolahan Aplikasi word processing Dasar-dasar pembuatan dokumen 3 × 50 menit 4
dokumen
 FORM H2.xx (VERSI 01)

KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN – UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT – PROGRAM PASCASARJANA

PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER TEKNIK SIPIL 2/3
GEDUNG FAKULTAS TEKNIK KAMPUS UNLAM BANJARMASIN 70123 TELP. 0511-3304503 FAKS. 0511-3304503 EMAIL psmts@teknikunlam.ac.id; psmts@ft.unlam.ac.id
GARIS-GARIS BESAR PROGRAM PENGAJARAN
JUDUL MATA KULIAH: Teknologi Informasi KODE MATA KULIAH: H18202 JUMLAH SKS: 3

NO. TUJUAN INSTRUKSIONAL KHUSUS POKOK BAHASAN SUB POKOK BAHASAN WAKTU REFERENSI
8. Menguasai teknik-teknik peningkatan Aplikasi word processing (lanjutan) 4
produktivitas dan pemeliharaan 3 × 50 menit
konsistensi dokumen
9. (Tugas Aplikasi 2) 3 × 50 menit

10. Menguasai teknik-teknik presentasi Aplikasi presentasi Teknik-teknik pembuatan presentasi 3 × 50 menit 6

11. Memahami dasar-dasar sistem Dasar-dasar sistem informasi Prinsip-prinsip dasar sistem informasi
3 × 50 menit
informasi
12. Memahami dasar-dasar database Dasar-dasar database Prinsip-prinsip dasar database 3 × 50 menit

13. Memahami penggunaan tabel pada Aplikasi database Penggunaan tabel

3 × 50 menit 7
aplikasi database
14. Memahami penggunaan query pada Aplikasi database (lanjutan) Penggunaan query
3 × 50 menit 7
aplikasi database
15. (Tugas Teori 2) 3 × 50 menit

REFERENSI:
1. (untuk tatap muka pertama)
 Al-Jibouri, S. H., and M. J. Mawdesley. 2002. “A knowledge based system for linking information to support decision making in construction.” Electr. J. IT. in Constr., 7, 83-100. http://www.itcon.org.
 Brilakis, I., and L. Soibelman. 2005. “Content-based search engines for construction image databases.” Automation in Constr., 14(4), 537-50.
 Choi, Y-K. 2004. Principles of Applied Civil Engineering Design. Reston, VA: ASCE Press.
 Eakin, J. 2002. “Towards intelligent image retrieval.” Pattern Recognition, 35(1), 3-14.
 Emmitt, S., and D. T. Yeomans. 2001. Specifying Buildings: A Design Management Perspective. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
 Ferrucci, D., and A. Lally. 2004. “Building an example application with the Unstructured Information Management Architecture.” IBM Systems J., 43(3), 455-75.
 Froese, T. 2007. “Information management in nD”. In G. Aouad, A. Lee, and S. Wu (eds.). Constructing the Future: nD Modelling. London: Taylor & Francis, 245-59.
 Hand, D., H. Mannila, and P. Smyth. 2001. Principles of Data Mining. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
 Johansson, P., and M. Popova. 2002. “Case-based design using weakly structured information.” Electr. J. IT. in Constr., 7, 27-44. http://www.itcon.org.
 Lee, S., L-M. Chang, and M. Skibniewski. 2006. “Automated recognition of surface defects using digital color image processing.” Automation in Constr., 15(4), 540-9.
 Lemaire, G., G. Escadeillas, and E. Ringot. 2005. “Evaluating concrete surfaces using an image analysis process.” Constr. and Building Materials, 19(8), 604-11.
 Leu, S-S., and S-L. Chang. 2005. “Digital image processing based approach for tunnel excavation faces.” Automation in Constr., 14(6), 750-65.
 Mao, W., Y. Zhu, and I. Ahmad. 2006. “Applying metadata models to unstructured content of construction documents: a view-based approach.” Automation in Constr., 16(2), 242-52.
 Simoff, S. J., and M. L. Maher. 1998. “Ontology-based multimedia data mining for design information retrieval”. In K. C. Wang, T. Adams, M. L. Maher, and A. Songer (eds.). Proc. Int’l Computing Congress:
Computing in Civil Eng., 18-21 October. Boston, Massachusetts, US. ASCE, 212-23.
 Sinha, S. K., and P. W. Fieguth. 2006. “Automated detection of cracks in buried concrete pipe images.” Automation in Constr., 15(1), 58-72.
 Smeulders, A. W. M., M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. Jain. 2000. “Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. & Machine Intelligence, 22(12), 1349-80.
 Sommerville, J., and N. Craig. 2006. Implementing IT in Construction. London: Taylor & Francis.
 Winch, G. M. 2002. Managing Construction Projects. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
 Zhu, Y., W. Mao, and I. Ahmad. 2007. “Capturing implicit structures in unstructured content of construction documents.” ASCE J. Comp. in Civil Eng., 21(3), 220-7.
 FORM H2.xx (VERSI 01)

KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN – UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT – PROGRAM PASCASARJANA

PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER TEKNIK SIPIL 3/3
GEDUNG FAKULTAS TEKNIK KAMPUS UNLAM BANJARMASIN 70123 TELP. 0511-3304503 FAKS. 0511-3304503 EMAIL psmts@teknikunlam.ac.id; psmts@ft.unlam.ac.id
GARIS-GARIS BESAR PROGRAM PENGAJARAN
JUDUL MATA KULIAH: Teknologi Informasi KODE MATA KULIAH: H18202 JUMLAH SKS: 3

REFERENSI (lanjutan):

2. (untuk tatap muka kedua)

 Betts, M., and T. Wood-Harper. 1994. “Reengineering construction: a new management research agenda.” Constr. Manag. & Econ., 12, 551-6.
 BSI. 2005. Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval – Guide. Part 1: Definitions, Symbols and Abbreviations. BS 8723-1. London: BSI.
 Chandrasekaran, B., R. Josephson, and V. R. Benjamins. 1999. “What are ontologies, and why do we need them?” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 20-6.
 CPIC. 1997. UniClass. London: RIBA Publishing.
 CSI-CSC. 2004. MasterFormat 2004 Edition – Numbers & Titles. http://www.csinet.org.
 Davis, R., HH. Shrobe, and P. Szolovits. 1993. “What is a knowledge representation?” AI Magazine, 14(1), 17-33.
 Gulledge, C. E., L. J. Beougher, M. J. King, R. P. Dean, D. J. Hall, N. M. Giglio, G. W. Bevier, and P. Steinberg. 2007. MasterFormat 2004 Edition – 2007 Implementation Assessment. Construction Specifications
Institute.
 Kang, L. S., and B. C. Paulson. 2000. “Information classification for civil engineering projects by UniClass.” ASCE J. Constr. Eng. & Manag., 126(2), 158-67.
 Murphy, G. L. 2004. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 Solomon, K. O., D. L. Medin, and E. Lynch. 1999. “Concepts do more than categorize.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(3), 99-105.
 Staub-French, S., M. Fischer, J. Kunz, and B. Paulson. 2003. “An ontology for relating features with activities to calculate costs.” ASCE J. Comp. in Civil Eng., 17(4), 243-54.
 Uschold, M., M. King, S. Moralee, and Y. Zorgios. 1998. “The enterprise ontology.” The Knowledge Engineering Review, 13(1), 31-89.
3. Yeoman, K. 2003. Strategic Advantages of nformation Technology in Construction. M.S. Thesis, Dept Civil Eng., Massachusette Institute Technology.
4. Cox, J., dan J. Lambert. 2010. Microsoft Word 2010 Step by Step. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
5. Frye, C. D. 2010. Microsoft Excel 2010 Step by Step. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
6. Cox, J., dan J. Lambert. 2010. Microsoft Powerpoint 2010 Step by Step. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
7. Cox, J., dan J. Lambert. 2010. Microsoft Access 2010 Step by Step. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.