JURNAL/HASIL
PENELITIAN/ARTI
KEL
Oleh
Dr. H AGUNG SUHARTO, APP, S.Pd,
M.Kes.
❖ Why Stress is Bad for Your Brain? Science, 1996, Vol. 273 (9): 749.
❖ Leading scientist still reject God,, Nature, 1998, Vol. 394, No. 23: 313.
Apakah abstrak
➢ ditulis secara padat?
➢ menampilkan isu-isu pokok atau masalah
penelitian dan alternatif pemecahannya?
➢ memuat metode/pendekatan yang
digunakan?
➢ memuat simpulan penelitian?
➢ bukan komentar atau pengantar dari
penulis?
Dr. H. AGUNG SUHARTO, M.Kes 2020
Apakah kata kunci:
➢ punya makna yg khas dan jelas?
➢ terdiri dari 3-5 kata?
➢ eksplisit ada dalam judul atau implisit
di dalam bahasan?
➢ mengacu kepada glosarium atau tesaurus yg relevan?
➢ dapat digunakan untuk “filing and searching”, pengelompokan,
dan dokumentasi?
Hal ini teridentifikasi dari sedikitnya rujukan yang berupa artikel jurnal
yang dirujuk pada bagian pendahuluan.
Apakah:
➢ ada hasil penelitian yang tidak baru atau tidak penting yang perlu
dibuang dari naskah?
➢ terdapat misconduct seperti manipulasi data, penjiplakan, pencantuman
dalam naskah nama orang lain yangg tidak ikut dalam kegiatan penelitian
atau perbuatan lain yang tidak dapat diterima oleh masyarakat ilmiah yang
dilakukan oleh penulis artikel?
Apakah pembahasan:
➢ berupa kupasan, bukannya mengulang-sebut apa yang sudah
ditampilkan dalam grafik, tabel atau diagram?
➢ diungkapkan dalam bahasa dialog yang logis, sistematik, dan
mengalir?
➢ bersifat analitik, argumentatif, logis, kritis?
➢ menginterpretasikan secara tepat hasil penelitian?
Judul Artikel Objectives / Informasi ilmiah / Materials dan Grand Theory Conclusion/Kesimpulan Keterkaitan
Penulis Tujuan Penelitian Alur informasi Methods Results dengan Proposal
Tahun Dasar teori / Disertasi
Jenis Konseptualisasi
Judul Artikel: Objectives: The Breast cancer Materials and Results: The mean Conclusions: By using My research
The knowledge aims of this appears to be a Methods 244 women age of the women the CHBMS constructs wants to prove
and attitudes of cross-sectional disease of both the were recruited by was 37.7 ± 13.7. for assessment, Modifying factors,
breast self- study were to means of cluster 49.2% of women primary health care Individual beliefs,
developing and
examination and determine levels sampling in this were primary school providers can more Cues to Action,
mammography in of knowledge developed worlds. study. The graduates, 67.6% easily understand the Attitude,
a group of about breast Among Turkish questionnaire were married. beliefs that influence Subjective norm,
women in a rural cancer and to women, breast consisted of Although 76.6% of women's BSE and perceived control
area in western evaluate health cancer is the sociodemographic the women in this mammography and Intention to
Turkey beliefs second leading variables, a risk study reported that practice. affect the
Penulis: concerning the factors and signs of they had heard or behavior
cause of cancer-
1. Pınar Erbay model that breast cancer form read about breast Individual
Dündar1*, promotes breast related deaths. and the adapted cancer, our study behavior
2. Dilek self- examination version of revealed that only (participation to
Özmen , 2 3. (BSE) and Champion's Health 56.1% of them had the neighborhood
Beyhan mammography in Belief Model Scale sufficient knowledge health center),
Öztürk1, 4. a group of (CHBMS). Bivariate of breast cancer, half while The aims of
Gökçe women aged 20– correlation analysis, of whom had this cross-
Haspolat1, 5. 64 in a rural area Chi square test, acquired the sectional study
Filiz Akyıldız1, of western Mann-Whitney U test information from were to
6. Sümeyra Turkey. and logistic health professionals. determine levels
Çoban1 Dr.7.H. AGUNG SUHARTO, M.Kes 2020 regression analysis Level of breast of knowledge
Gamze were performed cancer knowledge about breast
Çakıroğlu1 throughout the data was the only variable cancer and to
analysis. significantly evaluate health
Tugas kelompok
Mahasiswa dibagi menjadi 8 kelompok