NSDC 2022

It’s a battle about

WHAT IS finding the most just
and effective solution
DEBATING to a problem.
 Beberapa Kekeliruan

 Debat = Tanpa aturan / Etika

 Debat = Lomba ngotot dan asal berbicara

 Debat = Tidak Ilmiah

 Debat = Tidak bermanfaat secara akademik

 DEFINISI ATAS MOSI

• Temukan kata Definisi yang baik

kuncinya • Truistic
• Temukan semangat • Debatable • Tautological
mosi • Relevant • Squirelling
• Temukan issue / • Reasonable
• Setting tempat &
konteks nya • Clear
waktu yang tidak fair
• Contextual
Langkah mendefinisikan
Definisi
terlarang
 Motion biasanya diawali dengan THW(This House
Motion Would....)THBT (This House Believe That....)

THW :
Proposal debate, maksudnya adalah peserta
debat harus memberikan argument yang
disertai dengan solusi dan langkah-langkah
yang harus dilakukan (peserta harus
mengajukan proposal) dalam solusi tersebut
Contoh :
THW stop importing rice,
THW ban alchoholic drinks
THBT
Philosophical debate, maksudnya adalah dalam
debat itu nantinya hanya akan memperdebatkan
bahwa sesuatu hal (yang disebutkan dalam
motion tersebut) benar atau salah, baik atau
tidak, signifikan atau tidak, tanpa memberikan
langkah-langkah atau solusi penyelesaian.
Contoh :
THBT homeschooling is not good
THBT senior high school is better than
vocational high school.

Argument harus selalu disertai dengan bukti-bukti dan fakta-

fakta yang relevan dan kuat serta contoh-contih yang relevan
 ARGUMENTS

LOGIS

RUNUT RELEVAN

JELAS KONSISTEN
 BUKTI & PEMBUKTIAN ARGUMEN
Teori
Instrumen
hukum
Kualitatif Berita
Pendapat ahli /
Hasil riset tokoh

BUKTI

Statistika

Hasil
Kuantitatif Survey
Temuan
Riset
REBUTTAL

sanggahan dari argument lawan

argument pokok

Rebuttal biasanya berdasarkan pada:

Fakta yang salah (error facts)

Bukti yang tidak relevan (irrelevan proof)
Hal-hal yang tidak masuk akal (illogical)
DEBATING FORMAT
BRITISH
PARLIAMENTARY
FORMAT
1. Each side consists of 4 teams;
each team consists of 2 members
2. The opening and closing team
are defending the same side, but
they are judged as two different
teams
 PRIME MINISTER

• Set a clear debate: KEEP IN MIND :

 Problem Don’t restrict the debate to certain
 Stance (Solution) and areas/countries an timeframe unless
Mechanism the motion requires so
 Goal
• Bring arguments
LEADER OF OPPOSITION
KEEP IN MIND :
• Provide counter
stance (solution) 1. Does the problem exist ?
• Bring rebuttals
2. If it does exist :
• Bring arguments
a. Is the Status Quo working ?
b. Can the Status Quo be improved ?
3. Will the solution offered by Government
Team :
a. Be effective to solve the problem ?
b. Worsen the situation ?
AUSTRAL-ASIAN
PARLIAMENTARY
FORMAT
1. Each side consists of 2 teams;
each team consists of 3 members
2. The reply speech are given either
by the 1st speaker or the 2nd
speaker.
ROLE OF SPEAKERS
•1st : Lays out the basic fundaments of the team’s
case, including elementary argumentations
•2nd : Continues the case by responding, rebuild
the case and provide continuity analysis of
argumentations
•3rd : Reviews the overall case of opponent and
provide a more thorough ballistics of response to
argument. No new matter!
•Reply : Provide an overview of the debate and
why their team deserves the debate
ROLE OF 1ST SPEAKERS
AFFIRMATIVE
Defining the motion of the debate.
Presenting the affirmative’s theme line.
Outlining the affirmative’s team split.
Delivering substantial arguments.
Providing a brief summary/recap of the
speech
NEGATIVE
Responding the definition given by the
affirmative team (accept/challenge).
Rebutting the 1st affirmative speaker.
Presenting the negative’s theme line.
Outlining the negative’s team split.
Delivering the substantial argument.
Providing a brief summary/recap of the
speech.
ROLE OF 2ND SPEAKERS
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
Rebutting the 1st negative’s major Rebutting the 2nd affirmative speaker.
arguments
Restating the negative's team case
Restating the affirmative’s team
briefly.
case briefly.
Delivering his substantial arguments.
Delivering his substantial
argument. Providing a brief summary.
Providing a brief summary.
ROLE OF 3RD SPEAKERS
AFFIRMATIVE
mapping
Rebutting the points raised by the
first two negative speakers.
Rebuilding the team’s case.
Summarizing the issues of the
debate
NEGATIVE
mapping
Rebutting the points raised by all three
affirmative speakers.
Rebuilding team’s case.
Summarizing the issue of the debate
 ROLE OF REPLY SPEECH
Providing the summary or the overview of the debate.
Identifying the issues raised by both sides.
Providing a bias adjudication of the debate.
 CHALLENGE MOTION
Opposition may challenge the definition of government if
it is included into prohibited definition (truism,
tautological, squirreling, and time/place set unfairly).
When challenging definition, opposition must:
Say that they challenge the definition
Provide the reason
Provide alternative definition
Respond to the government case (using ‘even if’ rebuttal).
 Based concept of debate in general

Topik yg diperdebatkan
Motion

mendeskripsikan motion agar lebih jelas dan

Definiti
on lebih fokus atau lebih spesifik

Team • Alasan besar setuju atau tidak setuju pada mosi & tujuan
line& besar yang ingin di capai serta dibuktikan oleh sebuah team
team • pembagian tugas / distribusi argumen dalam team
split
 Sanggahan, pertanyaan maupun klarifikasi yang
POI disampaikan ketika lawan sedang berbicara

Argumen harus disertai contoh atau bukti.

Evidence

Case Proses membangun kasus secara mandiri, efektif,

building efisien dan sesuai aturan oleh team dengan waktu
yang telah disampaikan
 Berbagai alasan yang di gunakan untuk membuktikan
Argument team line & tujuan team

Bantahan argumen tim lawan (Oposition team)

Rebbutal mengenai hal-hal yang kontradiksi dengan argumen tim
penyanggah