Lembar Penilaian Debat

No. Nama Ketepatan Sumber Kesesuaian Penggunaan Penampilan Konsistensi Kejelian Kesesuaian Jumlah
Analisis Data Data Data saat Memberi Kesimpulan
Latar dengan Terkini Berbicara Tanggapan dengan
Belakang Argumen (Rebatt) Proses
Debat
1 Alamsyah
2 Asti Novitasari
3 Devi Putriana
4 Elisa Putri
agung
5 Fitriyanti
Arifin
6 Haeruddin
7 Hamria Pratiwi
8 Muh. Khaliq
9 Nur
Muqarramah
10 Veggi
Plentisari

Pedoman Penilaian:
Skor : 1 = Kurang
2 = Cukup
3 = Baik

= =

 Rubrik Penilaian

No Aspek yang dinilai Skor Kriteria

1 Ketepatan Analisis 3 Analisis tepat, terorganisasi dan sesuai dengan keadaan nyata
Latar Belakang 2 Analisis tepat, sesuai dengan kenyataan namun kurang terorganisasi
1 Analisis kurang tepat, kurang teroganisir namun sudah sesuai dengan kenyataan
2 Sumber Data 3 Hasil penelitian dan artikel dari web sains atau universitas terpercaya
2 Bacaan dari web terpercaya
1 Tulisan di blogspot atau wordpress dan sejenisnya
3 Kesesuian Data 3 Data terpercaya dan sesuai dengan argumentasi
dengan Argumentasi 2 Data terpercaya namun kurang sesuai dengan argumentasi
1 Data tidak terpercaya dan tidak sesuai dengan argumentasi
4 Penggunaan Data 3 Data dari 3 tahun terakhir (2013- 2016)
Terkini 2 Data dari 7 tahun terakhir (2009- 2012)
1 Data dari 11 tahun terakhir (2005- 2008)
5 Penampilan Saat 3 Percaya diri dan mampu mengendalikan situasi debat
Berbicara 2 Kurang percaya diri dan mampu mengendalikan situasi debat
1 Kurang percaya diri dan kurang mampu mengendalikan situasi debat

6 Konsintensi 3 Sangat yakin dan tidak terpengaruh dengan argumen lawan

2 Kurang yakin dan tidak terpengaruh dengan argumen lawan
1 Kurang yakin dan terpengaruh dengan argument lawan
7 Kejelian Memberi 3 Mampu menangkap kekurangan argumen lawan dengan tepat dan memberi sanggahan yang
Tanggapan (Rebatt) logis terhadapnya
2 Kurang mampu menangkap kekurangan argumen lawan dengan tepat dan memberi sanggahan
yang logis terhadapnya
1 Kurang mampu menangkap kekurangan argumen lawan dengan tepat dan tidak dapat memberi
sanggahan yang logis terhadapnya
8 Kesesuian 3 Kesimpulan sesuai dengan proses debat dan mendukung argumentasinya
Kesimpulan dengan 2 Kesimpulan tidak sesuai dengan proses debat dan hanya mendukung argumentasinya
Proses Debat 1 Kesimpulan tidak sesuai dengan proses debat dan tidak mendukung argumentasinya
 Debate Assessment Sheet

No. Name Background Source Data Data Appearance Consistency Careful Conformity amount
Analysis Data Suitability Usage while Response Conclusion
Accuracy with Update Speaking (Rebatt) with
Arguments Debate
Process
1 Alamsyah
2 Asti
Novitasari
3 Devi Putriana
4 Elisa the great
princess
5 Fitriyanti
Arifin
6 Haeruddin
7 Hamria
Pratiwi
8 Muh. Khaliq
9 Nur
Muqarramah
10 Veggi
Plentisari
Assessment Guidelines:
Score: 1 = Less
2 = Enough
3 = Good
Assessment rubric

No Rated aspect Score Criteria

1 Accuracy 3 Analysis precise, organized and in accordance with the real situation
of Analysis 2 Precise analysis, is realistic, but less organized
Background
1 The analysis is less precise, less organized but is in conformity with reality
2 Data sources 3 The results of the research and science articles from the web or university reliable
2 Readings from the web reliable
1 Writing on blogspot or wordpress and the like
3 Data conformity with 3 Data reliably and in accordance with the argument
Arguments 2 Data reliable but less in accordance with the argument
1 The data is not reliable and does not correspond with the argument
4 Latest Data Usage 3 Data from the last 3 years (2013- 2016)
2 Data from the last 7 years (2009- 2012)
1 Data from the last 11 years (2005- 2008)
5 Appearance While 3 Confident and able to control the situation debate
Talking 2 Lack of confidence and being able to control the situation debate
1 Less confident and less able to control the situation debate
6 Consequences 3 Very confident and is not affected by the arguments opponents
2 Less assured and is not affected by the arguments opponents
1 Less confident and unaffected by the argument opponents
7 Foresight Responds (Rebatt) 3 Able to capture the opponent's shortcomings argument with precise and logical to make
objections against
2 Less able to capture the opponent's shortcomings argument with precise and logical to
make objections against
1 Less able to capture the opponent's deficiencies with appropriate arguments and can not
answer that is logical for him
8 Conclusions conformitywith 3 Conclusions in accordance with the process of debate and support his argument
Process Debate 2 Conclusions are not in accordance with the process of debate and only supports the
argument
1 Conclusions are not in accordance with the process of debate and do not support his
argument