GRU

60104

Panduan Pelaksanaan
Kerja Kursus
KAEDAH PENYELIDIKAN UNTUK
PENDIDIKAN

FAKULTI PEMBANGUNAN MANUSIA

UNIVERSITI PENDIDIKAN SULTAN IDRIS
 2

1.0 PENGENALAN
Kursus ini memperkenalkan konsep, teori dan proses dalam penyelidikan. Aspek yang disentuh
adalah mengenal pasti bidang dan topik penyelidikan; tujuan penyelidikan; penyataan masalah;
pembinaan soalan penyelidikan/hipotesis; teori-teori dan model; kajian literatur; kaedah memungut
dan menganalisis data; kesimpulan dan cadangan; menulis laporan; dan etika dalam penyelidikan.

2.0 HASIL PEMBELAJARAN KURSUS

1. Menilai konsep dan jenis penyelidikan, proses menjalankan penyelidikan. (C5)

2. Menjustifikasikan penggunaan teori, tinjauan literatur dan reka bentuk penyelidikan. (C5)
3. Menyesuaikan analisis data dengan reka bentuk penyelidikan. (P6)
4. Menulis secara kritikal kertas cadangan penyelidikan. (A4)

3.0 PENILAIAN PRESTASI PELAJAR

Kerja Kursus Peratusan

Perincian CLO %
Ulasan Artikel (Article Review) CLO2 10
Forum CLO3 20 60%
Cadangan Penyelidikan CLO4 30
(Research Proposal)
Pentaksiran Akhir CLO1 40 40%
Jumlah 100%
 3

4.0 BENTUK KERJA KURSUS

Sila baca SEMUA perkara yang terdapat di bawah supaya anda mendapat kefahaman yang
sebenar tentang bagaimana hendak menyelesaikan kerja kursus anda.

Tugasan Arahan Tarikh Akhir %

4.1 Ulasan Artikel Analisis tiga artikel terkini (2018 dan ke atas) yang relevan 10
dengan fokus kajian anda.

i) Tuliskan satu ulasan artikel berdasarkan hasil

analisis ketiga-tiga artikel tersebut.
ii) Cadangan isi kandungan:
a. Pengenalan (nyatakan tema utama setiap artikel).
b. Ringkasan (analisis isi kandungan setiap artikel
dari aspek tujuan kajian, metodologi kajian, dapatan
kajian, kesimpulan dan implikasi kajian).
c.Perbincangan (Nilaikan sumbangan setiap artikel
berkait fokus kajian anda. Nyatakan kritikan untuk
setiap artikel dan sokong kritikan anda dengan bukti
daripada artikel tersebut atau sumber lain).
d. Rumusan (rumuskan kesemua ketiga-tiga artikel
dan beri cadangan untuk kajian lanjutan).
e. Rujukan.
f. Lampiran.

iii) Format penulisan:

a. Font Times New Roman, saiz font 12.
b. Spacing 1.5
c. Muka surat : 12-15 muka surat
d. Rujukan mengikuti format APA

iv) Ulasan artikel ini hendaklah dimuat naik di tapak

yang disediakan pensyarah di MyGuru dalam format
PDF.
4.2 Forum Soalan forum akan disediakan di myGuru oleh pensyarah 20
masing-masing. Pelajar dikehendaki memberi komen yang
konstruktif kepada isu yang dimuatnaik dan juga komen
kepada pernyataan dua orang kawan yang lain.

4.3. Cadangan 1. Sediakan satu cadangan penyelidikan yang 30

Penyelidikan mengandungi aspek berikut:

a. MUKA DEPAN (Rujuk Lampiran 1)

b. BAB 1: PENGENALAN
i. Latar Belakang Kajian
ii. Pernyataan Masalah
iii. Tujuan Kajian
iv. Objektif, Soalan, Hipotesis Kajian
v. Kerangka Konseptual Kajian
 4

vi. Kepentingan Kajian

vii. Batasan Kajian
viii. Definisi Istilah

c. BAB 2: TINJAUAN LITERATUR

i. Latar belakang pembolehubah
ii. Teori dan model yang menyokong kajian
iii. Kajian lepas

d. BAB 3: METODOLOGI
i. Reka bentuk Kajian
ii. Populasi dan Sampel
iii. Instrumen
iv. Kajian Rintis
v. Prosedur Pengumpulan Data
vi. Kaedah Menganalisis Data
vii. Rumusan

2. Format penulisan:
a. Font Times New Roman, saiz font 12 (tajuk)
dan 12 bagi penulisan.
b. Spacing 1.5
c. Muka surat : 25 - 30 muka surat
d. Rujukan mengikuti format APA (sekurang-
kurangnya 2 buku rujukan dan 10 artikel dari
jurnal 2018 dan ke atas).

3. Cadangan penyelidikan hendaklah dimuat naik di tapak

yang disediakan pensyarah di MyGuru dalam format
PDF.
 5

LAMPIRAN 1

MARKAH
RIS
SEMESTER 1 SESI 2010/2011

KOD & NAMA KURSUS

GRU 60104 : KAEDAH PENYELIDIKAN UNTUK PENDIDIKAN

TUGASAN : ____________________________

TAJUK

DISEDIAKAN OLEH

NAMA NO. MATRIK PROGRAM NO. TELEFON

KUMPULAN KULIAH :

PENSYARAH :
LAMPIRAN 2 : RUBRIK CADANGAN PENYELIDIKAN (RESEARCH PROPOSAL)

Criteria Excellent = 3 points Satisfactory = 2 points Marginal = 1 points Unacceptable = 0

Introduction Introduction clearly stated Introduction stated with some Introduction stated with Introduction not
and discussed. discussion. minimal discussion. included.

Problem statement Problem clearly stated and
discussed.
Purpose/aims/objectives Purpose/ aims/ objectives
clearly stated.
Problem stated with some Problem stated with Problem statement not
discussion. minimal discussion. included.
Purpose/ aims/ objectives can be Purpose/ aims/ Purpose/ aims/
inferred but are not explicit. objectives unclear. objectives not
included.

Concepts Concepts clearly identified and Concepts identified, Concepts identified but poorly Concepts not
Concepts/definitions comprehensively defined. adequately defined. defined. identified.

Framework Conceptual framework Conceptual framework identified. Conceptual framework Conceptual

Conceptual/theoretical comprehensively discussed in Congruency between conceptual identified. Congruency between framework not
framework relation to purpose/ aims/ framework purpose/ aims/ conceptual framework purpose/ identified.
objectives/ variables. objectives/ variables adequately aims/ objectives/ variables
articulated. poorly articulated.
Literature Review Demonstrated basic knowledge Demonstrated basic knowledge of Unclearly mentioned some Did not mention any
of literature in the area,and of literature or previous research in previous work in the area. previous research,
prior work on the specific the area, but did not mention any literature, or theories.
research problem. Mentioned at theories.
least 1 theory.
Research Design • Research design • Research design • Research design does • Research design
supports identified marginally supports not support identified not identified.
 7

problem. identified problem. problem.

• Research design is
comprehensive.
• Research design has
logical flow.
• Research design is • Research design has
sufficient but not limited or no logical flow.
comprehensive.
• Logical flow is
inconsistent.

Data Collection Tools • Data collection tools • Data collection tools • Data collection tools • Data collection
comprehensively adequately described. described. tools not
described. • Tools selected relate to • Tools selected poorly described.
• Tools selected research design. relate to research
appropriate to design.
research design.

Data Analysis • Plan for data analysis • Plan for data analysis • Plan for data analysis • Plan for data
appropriate to appropriate to inappropriate to analysis not
methodology. methodology. methodology included.
• Plan for data analysis • Plan for data analysis • Plan for data
comprehensively described. analysis poorly
described. described.
Bibliography • All references listed follow • Most references listed • Most references listed • None provided.
APA format follow APA format do not follow APA
format.

LAMPIRAN 3 : RUBRIK TUGASAN ULASAN ARTIKEL

 8

LOW AVERAGE HIGH WEIGHTAGE

DESCRIPTION (1) (2) (3)
Summary The student does not clearly summarize Most of the article is summarized, but the The summary clearly outlines the main 2
the main points of the article (i.e., the student may not clearly cover all aspects research question, methods, results, and
main research question, methods, results, (i.e., the main research question, implications in the student’s own words.
and implications) and/or includes methods, results, and implications).
inaccurate information.
The student does not clearly move The student provides an analysis of the The student provides an insightful 2
Analysis beyond a summary of the article to article by answering most of the analysis of the article, answering all or
provide an analysis. No new ideas are questions assigned. The ideas presented nearly all of the questions assigned. The
contributed beyond what is in the article are mostly novel, going beyond what is in student articulates novel ideas that clearly
itself, or the analysis is overly confusing. the article itself. go beyond what is in the article itself. The
analysis is clear and rational.
Writing Overall, the student’s communication of Overall, the student’s communication of Overall, the student’s communication of 2
their analysis is confusing, unclear, their analysis is somewhat clear and/or their analysis is clear and evidences a
and/or suggests limited understanding of suggests some understanding of the general, overarching understanding of the
the issues involved in this question. issues involved in this question. issues involved in this question.

Paper is follows most of the formatting Paper is follows all formatting guidelines
Format guidelines outlined in the syllabus, and outlined in the syllabus, and accurately
accurately cites most of the article in cites the article in APA format at the end.
APA format at the end.

LAMPIRAN 4 : RUBRIK PEMBENTANGAN PROPOSAL

 9

Criteria Excellent = 4 points Satisfactory = 3 points Marginal = 2 points Unacceptable = 0

Presentation Design Presentation well- Presentation

organized. disorganized.
Slides Slides are clear, succinct and Slides are generally clear, Slides are inconsistent in clarity Slides are unclear and
demonstrate professional succinct and demonstrate and quality. poorly designed.
quality. adequate quality.

Oral Presentation Presenter is well‐ prepared and Presenter is somewhat prepared; Presenter is poorly prepared Presenter is
answers all questions correctly. answers most of the questions and has difficulty answering unprepared.
are correctly. most of the questions.