Nav Perbaikan Dan Perkuatan Baja 01-Structural Assessment of Jetty and Bridge

11/21/2018
METODE PERBAIKAN DAN PERKUATAN STRUKTUR

DIPLOMA TEKNIK INFRASTRUKTUR SIPIL
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER
Dosen Pengajar :
Afif Navir Refani, ST., MT.
IPITS 2015 10
LECTURE CONTENTS
11. Port and Bridge Assessment
12. Steel Structure Deterioration & Rehabilitation
13. Steel Structure Strengthening - Bracing
14. Steel Structure Strengthening - Composites
15. Concrete Structure Strengthening using steel
member
16. Evaluation 3
IPITS 2015 10
1
11/21/2018
LECTURE CONTRACT
1. Mahasiswa masuk tepat waktu dengan mempersiapkan LCD, Daftar Presensi
dan semua perlengkapan ruangan kuliah.
2. Penilaian Mata Kuliah meliputi :
1. Absensi (Kurang dari 80%, dipastikan tidak akan mendapatkan nilai yang
cukup).
2. Tugas
3. Keaktifan dalam kelas
4. Evaluasi
3. Mahasiswa wajib menanyakan / menghubungi dosen pengajar apabila kuliah
belum dimulai sampai dengan 30 menit dari jadwal yang ada.
4. Diwajibkan saling menghormati antara mahasiswa dan pengajar dengan tidak
membuat kegaduhan dalam bentuk apapun.
IPITS 2015 10
METODE PERBAIKAN DAN PERKUATAN STRUKTUR

DIPLOMA TEKNIK INFRASTRUKTUR SIPIL
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI SEPULUH NOPEMBER
CHAPTER – 11
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF PORT AND

BRIDGE
Oleh :
Afif Navir, ST., MT.
2
11/21/2018
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF JETTY
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF JETTY

BACKGROUND / STRUCTURAL TEST AT
TECHNICAL DATA VISUAL INSPECTION
SITUATION FIELD AND LABORATORY
GOOD STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT

DATA EVALUATION
SHOULD SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS /
SITUATION WITH COMPREHENSIVE
APPROACH TO PRODUCT SOME
APPLICABLE SOLUTIONS
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
DRAWING AND COST REPAIR AND OR

REPORTING AND
ESTIMATION FOR REPAIR OR STRENGHTENING
CONCLUSION
AND STRENGTHENING RECCOMENDATION
3
11/21/2018
BACKGROUND
(WHY WE NEED STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT)
ACCIDENT / DURABILITY CAPACITY ASSETS

UPGRADING
FORCE PROBLEMS MONITORING
MAJEURE (ADD MORE LOADS OR
TO EXISTING
STRUCTURE) MAINTENANCE
PURPOSE
TECHNICAL DATA TO SUPPORT JETTY

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Dimensi Dermaga  Dari Gambar As Build
Kriteria Desain Dermaga Untuk mengetahui pembebanan pada eksisting dermaga
Detailing Elemen Struktur Dermaga Dari Gambar As Build, diverifikasi dengan Pengujian
Aksesoris Penunjang Dermaga  Tipe Fender / Bollard beserta Spesifikasinya
Mutu Beton Dermaga  Data Perencanaan
Mutu Baja Tulangan Dermaga  Data Perencanaan
Mutu Tiang Pancang  Data Perencanaan untuk menghitung kekuatan Tiang
4
11/21/2018
VISUAL INSPECTION
JETTY FENDER & FOUNDATION /

STRUCTURE BOLLARD PILE CONDITION
INSPECTION INSPECTION INSPECTION
VISUAL INSPECTION
36000
4500 5300 5300 5300 5300 5400 3500

1400 TOP PLATE SURFACE ACCESSORIES
UNDER JETTY
STRUCTURE
PILE CONDITION
10 00°
5
11/21/2018
UPPER JETTY INSPECTION
UNDER JETTY STRUCTURE

INSPECTION
6
11/21/2018
PENGAMATAN VISUAL
Kerusakan Pada Pelat Bagian Bawah
PENGAMATAN VISUAL
Foto Mikrometer Pelat Bagian Bawah
7
11/21/2018
PENGAMATAN VISUAL
Foto Mikrometer Pelat Bagian Bawah
FOTO PENGUKURAN LEBAR RETAK
8
11/21/2018
Hasil Pembacaan Kedalaman Retak dan

Pengukuran Lebar Retak pada Elemen Pelat Bagian Atas, Wilayah
Kering (K)
JARAK PEMBACAAN ULTRASONIC KEDALAMAN LEBAR

ELEMEN
NO. KODE LOKASI H ( μdetik ) RETAK RETAK
STRUKTUR
( mm ) t1 t2 ( mm ) ( mm )
1 PELAT RPK - 1 CD → 9 100 107.3 179.8 81.2 0.2
2 PELAT RPK - 2 BC → 27-28 100 130.6 236.0 56.9 0.1
3 PELAT RPK - 3 MN → 27-28 100 128.1 245.0 35.9 0.19
4 PELAT RPK - 4 CD → 39-40 100 113.1 217.0 34.5 0.2
5 PELAT RPK - 5 CD → 57-58 100 82.6 145.6 65.1 0.14
6 PELAT RPK - 6 AB → 78-79 100 108.6 182.6 80.1 0.18
Rata-rata 59.0 0.168333
Hasil Pembacaan Kedalaman Retak dan Pengukuran Lebar Retak pada

Elemen Pelat Bagian Bawah dan Balok, Wilayah Splash Zone (K)
JARAK PEMBACAAN ULTRASONIC KEDALAMAN LEBAR

ELEMEN
NO. KODE LOKASI H ( μdetik ) RETAK RETAK
STRUKTUR
( Cm ) t1 t2 ( mm ) ( mm )
1 PELAT RPS - 1 BC → 6-7 100 213.0 380.2 61.0
2 PELAT RPS - 2 CD → 6-7 100 116.2 280.4 Retak Tembus
3 BALOK RBS - 1 BC → 7 100 95.5 175.6 51.0
4 PELAT RPS - 3 CD → 17-18 100 98.6 178.2 56.9 0.22
5 BALOK RBS - 2 CD → 18 100 120.4 285.2 Retak Tembus 0.20
6 PELAT RPS - 4 BC → 41-42 100 136.7 285.0 Retak Tembus 0.36
7 BALOK RBS - 3 BC → 42 100 138.7 240.2 70.8 0.20
8 BALOK RBS - 4 CD → 42 100 109.3 271.0 Retak Tembus 0.30
9 PELAT RPS - 5 BC → 78-79 100 219.0 320.0 128.2 0.20
10 PELAT RPS - 6 CD → 78-79 100 104.4 164.7 100.8
11 PELAT RPS - 7 D → 78-79 100 132.6 270.5 Retak Tembus
Rata-rata 78.1 0.246667
9
11/21/2018
Penggambaran Pola Retak Pelat Bawah Zone – I & Zone II

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
E
B
F
C
G
D
H
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
I
A
Zone – II
B
Zone – I
Penggambaran Pola Retak Pelat Bawah Zone – III & Zone IVA
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
A A
B B
C C
D D
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
A A
B B
C C
D D
48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
72 73 74 75 76 77
A
A
B
B
C
C
D
D
Zone – III Zone – IVA
10
11/21/2018
FENDER
STORM ANCHOR
JUNCTION BOX
STOPPER CRANE
CRANE REL
CRANE & CABLE TRAY
ACCESORIES
PUMP AND NOZZLE
11
11/21/2018
AS - D
AS - C
FOUNDATION
INSPECTION
CODE & REFERENCE

 Standard Design Criteria for Ports in Indonesia 1984.
 PIANC Guidelines for the Design of Fenders System.
 Technical Standards for Port and Harbour Facilities in Japan.
 Standar ketahanan Gempa untuk Jembatan (SNI 2833-2013).
 Tata Cara Perencanaan Struktur Beton (SNI 03-2847-2013).
 Tata Cara Perencanaan Struktur Baja (SNI 03-1729-2015).
 Persyaratan Perancangan Geoteknik (SNI 8460 – 2017)
 American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-11)
 AISC – 07 2010
 American Standard Testing Methode (ASTM)
 Standart-standart lain sejauh tidak bertentangan dengan ketentuan-ketentuan yang berlaku.
12
11/21/2018
STRUCTURAL TEST
AT FIELD
CORROSION
COREDRILL AND ULTRASONIC PULSE REBAR DETECTOR & ULTRASONIC STEEL
HAMMER TEST POTENTIAL AND
STEEL REBAR SAMPLE VELOCITY TEST COVER METER TEST THICKNESS TEST
CARBONATION TEST
LABORATORY TEST PERMEABILITY TEST
POROSITY TEST
CHLOR
PENETRATION TEST
CORROTION RATE
TEST
Concrete PH TEST
Rebar Tensile Test
Concrete
Compressive Test
13
11/21/2018
DATA EVALUATION
 Data Evaluation for pile condition

URAIAN A B C D E F G
Jumlah retak maxsimum/TP titik 9.00 11.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 3.00 2.00
Jumlah retak TP yang terjadi titik 64.00 269.00 232.00 258.00 74.00 6.00 5.00
Panjang retak total cm 6031.86 25352.65 21865.48 24315.93 6974.34 565.49 471.24
Jumlah TP sesuai gambar bh 113.00 57.00 57.00 113.00 57.00 113.00 113.00
Jumlah TP yang tidak dapat

bh 60.00 2.00 9.00 16.00 15.00 39.00 0.00
periksa
Jumlah TP yang dapat periksa bh 53.00 55.00 48.00 97.00 42.00 74.00 113.00
Jumlah TP yang rusak bh 25.00 52.00 47.00 74.00 24.00 39.00 4.00
Presentase kondisi yang rusak

% 47.17% 94.55% 97.92% 76.29% 57.14% 52.70% 3.54%
terhadap jumlah yang diperiksa
DATA EVALUATION
No. Uraian Satuan 1 2 3 4 5
DATA EVALUATION FOR CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
1 Lokasi Core 1 Core 2 Core 3 Core 4 Core 5
CD-10  2 Tanggal Test 18/10/13 18/10/13 18/10/13 18/10/13 18/10/13
3 lokasi LT. 3 LT. 5 TL. 7 LT. 10 LT. 12
4 Diameter, D mm 94,00 94,00 94,00 94,00 94,00
5 Tinggi, L mm 119,00 119,00 119,00 95,00 119,00
6 Berat gram 1960,00 2025,00 1985,00 1620,00 2075,00
Berat jenis 3
7 ton/m 2,37 2,45 2,40 2,46 2,51
8 Beban Tekan Maksimum, P kg 21200,00 23800,00 21850,00 23250,00 22250,00
Luas Penampang Beton, A 2
9 cm 69,40 69,40 69,40 69,40 69,40
P / A (silinder cor) 2
10 kg/cm 305,49 342,95 314,85 335,03 320,62
11 L/D 1,27 1,27 1,27 1,01 1,27
Faktor Koreksi
12 0,983 0,983 0,983 0,870 0,983
Karena L / D, K 1
Tulangan Melintang
13 φ r mm 10 / 10 8 8 8/8/8 8/8/8
h mm 13 / 44 20 37 8 / 10 / 19 8 / 19 / 45
15 Faktor Koreksi Tulangan, K 2 1,09 1,02 1,04 1,08 1,08
16 Compresive Strength
2
16.a Silinder ∅ 10 cm kg/cm 327,35 344,37 321,79 315,37 339,50
Silinder ∅ 15-30 cm 2
16.b fc '
kg/cm 314,76 331,12 309,41 303,24 326,44
(16.a /1.04) i
14
11/21/2018
DATA EVALUATION
 Data evaluation for UPV Test
Struktur bangunan Trestle dan Jetty di DUKS Gresik dihasilkan nilai

potesial tulangan maksimum adalah sebesar -416 mV.
Tabel Batasan Nilai Potensial Tulangan sesuai ASTM C 876
Nilai Potensial Kondisi Tulangan
> - 200 mV Kemungkinan korosi < 10 %
- 200 mV s/d – 350 mV Korosi tidak menentu
< -350 mV Tingkat korosi bisa mencapai 90%
15
11/21/2018
1100
1100
1000
1000
900
900
800
800
700
700
600
600
500
500
400 400
300 300
200 200
100 100
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500
2000 2100 2200 2300
Bagian Atas Bagian Bawah
Kontur Nilai Potensial Tulangan Dari Elemen Struktur Pelat Lantai Atas pada Zone I
As 7 - 10
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
• Analisa struktur dermaga dilakukan dengan dua metode
yaitu menggunakan permodelan struktur dengan SAP2000
untuk mengetahui kapasitas elemen struktur dan tiang
pancang dermaga.
• Dan model Plaxis untuk mengetahui stabilitas dermaga dan
analisa defleksi tiang pancang / pondasi akibat pengaruh
beban demaga.
16
11/21/2018
Evaluasi
Alternatif I Alternatif II Alternatif III
Pembesaran & a
Pembersihan
muka Beton Pembersihan Retak
Coating Penutupan Retak Dengan

Plameur
Pemasangan Nepple Untuk

Lubang Grouting Jarak ± 30 Cm
Grouting (Nepple 1) Tekanan

Alur alternatif perbaikan Minimum 60 Bar
kerusakan beton
Grouting (Nepple 1) Berhenti Bila
Bahan Grout Telah Keluar Pada
(Nepple 2) Berikutnya
Grouting Dilanjutkan Pada

Nepple 2 Setelah Nepple 1
Ditutup
REPAIR / Dan Seterusnya
STRENGTHENING Selesai
step 1
Repair III
beton
Analisa Repair/
Perbaikan tulangan baja
Study Repair
jack hammer
Metode Pengecoran Pemilihan Material Rencana Struktur Perancah

& Begisting
Lay Out Perancah
Pengupasan
Cek Kondisi Pemotongan Pembersihan

Akhir Tulangan Tulangan step 2
beton
Pembersihan Akhir Perbaikan Tulangan / dynabolt
Permukaan Beton Ganti inlet grout
outlet grout
papan bekisting
Proteksi Baja baja tulangan

Tulangan dicoating
REPAIR / Bonding
Lama & Baru
STRENGTHENING Pengecoran
17
11/21/2018
REPAIR / STRENGTHENING
 Perbaikan retak-retak maupun spalling yang terjadi pada elemen pelat / balok
dengan cara injeksi epoxy maupun patching dengan cement grout.
1cm
Pembersihan beton sampai dengan 1 cm

jack hammer
di belakang tulangan terkorosi

Metode pembersihan dengan cara mekanis inlet outlet
tulangan yang sudah

dibersihkan atau diganti
dynabolt papan bekisting
Proses patching dan injek cemen grout dan bekisting
18
11/21/2018
Jacketing Method
300 300
155
Overtopping
470
Plat Precast
Cast in Situ
Non Shrink Grout (75 mm)
Precast Crane Beam
The jacketing material using 75 mm thick of non

permeable, non shrinkage and silica fume layer
Overtopping
470
Plat Precast
METODA JACKETING
19
11/21/2018
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING

SEPULUH NOPEMBER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL ASSESSMENT OF

60M STEEL TRUSS BRIDGE
20
11/21/2018
Introduction
Kalimujur Bridge build to provide an alternative route between Lumajang city and Jember city
Before the bridge used for regular traffic, the loading test and structural assessment were
conducted to observe the actual condition of bridge structure.
These inspection only performed at one Approach Bridge near Lumajang City.
The loading procedure include static and dynamic loading test. The loading test
results was compared with result from structural analysis to provide
comprehensive Analysis.
KALIMUJUR BRIDGE
• Span of approach bridges : 60 m
• Span of main bridges : 128 m
• Total span : 368 m
Lumajang Side Jember Side
21
11/21/2018
KALIMUJUR BRIDGE
55116
5025 5016 5009 5011 5013 5014 5013 5011 5009 5016 5025
2/IGPT-1 2/IGPT-2 2/IGPT-3 2/IGPT-4 2/IGPT-5 2/IGPT-6 2/IGPT-6 2/IGPT-5 2/IGPT-4 2/IGPT-3 2/IGPT-2 2/IGPT-1
2/OGPT-1 TC1 2/OGPT-2 TC2 2/OGPT-3 TC3 2/OGPT-4 TC4 2/OGPT-5 TC5 2/OGPT-6 TC6 2/OGPT-6 TC5 2/OGPT-5 TC4 2/OGPT-4 TC3 2/OGPT-3 TC2 2/OGPT-2 TC1 2/OGPT-1
STP
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
0
x12
8x10
6
x20
6
400x
400x
400x
400x
12x2
12x1
10x1
8x10
40
40
40
40
400x
400x
10x1
10x1
10x1
12x1
12x1
400x
400x
10
0x25
0x20
0x15
0x15
0x12
150x
245x
275x
320x
325x
220x
325x
320x
275x
245x
150x
360x
150x
150x
200x
250x
11
DG
DG
300x
300x
DG
12
220x
7
DG
DG
DG
8
1
6
5
DG
6350
DG
3
DG
DG
DG
0x12
0x10
0x10
0x10
DG
4
10
2
DG
0x36
DG
DG
DG
DG
DG
DG
400x
DG
DG
11
DG
12
7
10x1
10x1
12x1
12x2
400x
400x
400x
400x
400x
8
6
8x10
12x2
DG
400x
400x
400x
400x
1
10
4
400x
2
12x1
9
8x
x1
x1
x1
x1
40
10
IWF
0
6
0
IW F
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
IWF
6
IWF
IWF
BC1 BC2 BC3 BC4 BC5 BC6 BC6 BC5 BC4 BC3 BC2 BC1
2/OGPB-1 2/OGPB-2 2/OGPB-3 2/OGPB-4 2/OGPB-5 2/OGPB-6 2/OGPB-7 2/OGPB-6 2/OGPB-5 2/OGPB-4 2/OGPB-3 2/OGPB-2 2/OGPB-1
2/IGPB-1 2/IGPB-2 2/IGPB-3 2/IGPB-4 2/IGPB-5 2/IGPB-6 2/IGPB-7 2/IGPB-6 2/IGPB-5 2/IGPB-4 2/IGPB-3 2/IGPB-2 2/IGPB-1
5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000
60000
Elevation
55160
5025 5016 5009 5011 5013 5014 5013 5011 5009 5016 5025
B B
IWF 400x280x10x16 IWF 400x375x16x20 IWF 400x435x16x24 IWF 400x425x20x30 IWF 400x450x24x30 IWF 400x450x30x30 IWF 400x450x24x30 IWF 400x425x20x30 IWF 400x435x16x24 IWF 400x375x16x20 IWF 400x280x10x16
TC1 TC2 TC3 TC4 TC5 TC6 TC5 TC4 TC3 TC2 TC1
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
IWF 300x150x6.5x9
IWF 300x150x6.5x9
7
7
9600
9200
7
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
0x
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
F1
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
IW
A A
Plan –Top Chord Bracing
Chord uses IWF 400. The IWF 250 and IWF 400 are applied for the stingers. The upper
bracing and floor beam utilize IWF 150 and IWF 750
3
KALIMUJUR BRIDGE
B B
IWF 400x200x8x10 IWF 400x325x10x16 IWF 400x400x16x20 IWF 400x375x16x30 IWF 400x400x20x30 IWF 400x450x20x30 IWF 400x450x20x30 IWF 400x400x20x30 IWF 400x375x16x30 IWF 400x400x16x20 IWF 400x325x10x16 IWF 400x200x8x10
1650 1000455
ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2 ST2
1650 1000
IWF 550x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
IWF 750x250x10x20
1650
1650
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG1
CG2
9200
9600
1650
1650
1000 1650
1000 1650
A 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 A
60000
Plan – Bottom Chord
Specification of Steel Material

Notation Yield Strength (MPa)
Tensile
Thickness of Rolled Steel
Strength
16mm to
< 16 mm > 40 mm (MPa)
40mm
SS 400 245 min 245 min 215 min 400 to 510
SM 490YB 365 min 365 min 336 min 490 t0 610
22
11/21/2018
Experimental Program
Test Instrument
• Six strain gauges
• Three Displacement Transducers
• Data Logger
• Dynamic Accelerator
SGBC6U
Strain Gauges
Displacement Transducers
Loading Test Procedurs (Static)
The applied load only 63% from Uniform Distribution Load (162 ton)
The actual total static load was divided into 10 two-axle dump truck
with gross weight of each vehicle were ranged from 15 tons to 17 tons.
The recording of dump truck gross weights were conducted at Mutiara

Halim Company.
Four loading stage and three unloading stage were applied during static
loading test. In each stage the measurement of deformation and strain
were recorded.
46
23
11/21/2018
Loading Test Procedurs (Static)
Stage 1 Total Load :

0 Truck 0 Ton
Loading Stage

4 Truck 64.84 Ton

8 Truck 131.05 Ton

10 Truck 162.20 Ton

Unloading Stage
8 Truck 131.05 Ton

4 Truck 64.84 Ton

0 Truck 0 Ton
47
Loading Test Procedurs (Dynamic)
The dynamic loading test
When truck crossover the
procedure were conducted
bridge the vertical
by measure the vibration on
acceleration on bridge were
the bridge that caused by
recorded with acceleration
truck motion on speed
transducer and data logger.
range from 30-40 km/h.
The actual bridge frequency

The actual bridge frequency
is higher than estimated
will be compared with
frequency means that actual
natural frequency that
stiffness of bridge is higher
estimated from structure
than calculated in structural
analysis.
analysis and vice versa.
48
24
11/21/2018
Test Result and Discussion

The recording of bridge displacement data
Load DT1 DT2 Total Station
Stage
(ton) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 64.84 13.08 13.90 26.60
3 131.05 23.10 25.98 35.60
4 162.20 23.96 27.06 37.40
5 131.05 22.89 25.78 35.49
6 64.84 13.11 13.80 26.45
7 0 0.01 0.00 0.00
DT1: Displacement Transducer 1; DT2 : Displacement
Transducer 2
49

The recording of bridge displacement data
10
Loading Stage Unloading Stage

(64.84 ton)
End of Stage 2
(131.05 ton)
End of Stage 3
(162.20 ton)
End of Stage 4
(131.05 ton)
End of Stage 5
(64.84 ton)
End of Stage6
0
Displacement (mm)
-10
-20
DT1
DT2
-30
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Time (second)
50
25
11/21/2018

The strain reading during static loading test
0.002
Yield Strength SM 490 B = 355 MPa

0.0015
(64.84 ton)
End of Stage 2
(131.05 ton)
End of Stage 3
(162.20 ton)
End of Stage 4
(131.05 ton)
End of Stage 5
(64.84 ton)
End of Stage 6
0.001
0.0005
Strain
-0.0005
DG1S
-0.001 DG2S
BC6S
-0.0015 Yield strength SM 490B = -355 MPa
-0.002
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
Time (second)
51

Vertical acceleration time history response of
approaches bridge of kalimujur bridge
0.05
0.025
Acceleration (m/sec2)
-0.025
-0.05
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (sec)
52
26
11/21/2018

Magnitude–Frequency relationship of the bridge
40
30
Magnitude
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20
Frequency (Hz)
The vertical acceleration were measured by acceleration transducer and

recorded in data logger. In order to obtain the bridge frequency the
acceleration data were processed using Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT)
method.
From the FFT method showed that the bridge frequency was 1.46 Hz
53
Structural Analysis
• Three-dimensional finite element of the bridge was
described and the procedures of static and dynamic loading
test were approached in modelling and analysis procedure.
• The truss members, stringers and floor beams were
modelled used 3-D frame elements. The bridge concrete
floor deck was represented as load that applied to stringers.
• The loading on model were represented by placing point
load with a load value of gross weight of two axle dump
truck
54
27
11/21/2018
Structural Analysis
• The actual deformation data that recorded was taken from total
station. Since this deformation data was more conservative that
Δ a c t u a l
deformation reading from displacement tranducers.

Δ p r e d i c t i o n
• The ratio displacement actual to displacement prediction were range

on 0.96 to 1.00
• This deformation comparison showed similar value between actual
and prediction displacement.
Stage
Load Δ actual Δ prediction Δ actual Δ prediction
(ton) (mm) (mm)
2 64.84 26.60 27.60 0.96
3 131.05 35.60 35.60 1.00
4 162.20 37.40 38.26 0.97
5 131.05 35.49 35.60 0.99
6 64.84 26.45 27.60 0.96
55
Structural Analysis
• The stress result from structural analysis exhibited
element DG1S, DG2S and BC6S were not reached yield
Δ a c t u a l
condition
• The comparison stress at peak applied load showed that

the actual stress that occurred in DG1S, DG2S and BC6S
were lower than predicted in structural analysis.
• It means that the stiffness of bridge was higher than
structural analysis
𝜎 𝜎 𝜎
Element 𝜎
(MPa) (MPa)
DG1S(IWF400x360x12x20) 23.40 32.70 0.72
DG2S (IWF400x300x12x16) 25.40 44.92 0.57
BC6S (IWF400x450x20x30). 29.00 51.03 0.57
56
28
11/21/2018
Conclusion
Δ a c t u a l Seven stages on static loading test were performed with peak applied
force was 63% of UDL. Visual inspections were conducted in each
1
load stage, and no damage occurred during static loading test.
The bridge showed elastic behaviour and the recorded stress at

2 elements that installed with strain gauges were conformed with
similar response.
The recorded bridge deformation and element stress from static

3 loading test were lower than bridge deformation and element stress
that estimated from structural analysis.
57
Conclusion
Δ a c t u a l
The natural frequency from structural analysis
Δ
4
p r e d i c t i o n
showed lower valued than frequency recorded during

the dynamic load test.
All these results showed that the actual bridge

5 exhibited more stiffness than predicted from
analysis.
The overall evaluation of the approach bridge of

6 Kalimujur bridges showed that this bridge is safe to
service regular traffic.
58
29
11/21/2018
SEKIAN DAN TERIMA KASIH
30

Nav Perbaikan Dan Perkuatan Baja 01-Structural Assessment of Jetty and Bridge

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Nav Perbaikan Dan Perkuatan Baja 01-Structural Assessment of Jetty and Bridge

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

11/21/2018

METODE PERBAIKAN DAN PERKUATAN STRUKTUR

METODE PERBAIKAN DAN PERKUATAN STRUKTUR

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF PORT AND

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF JETTY

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT OF JETTY

GOOD STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT

DRAWING AND COST REPAIR AND OR

ACCIDENT / DURABILITY CAPACITY ASSETS

TECHNICAL DATA TO SUPPORT JETTY

Kriteria Desain Dermaga Untuk mengetahui pembebanan pada eksisting dermaga

Aksesoris Penunjang Dermaga  Tipe Fender / Bollard beserta Spesifikasinya

Mutu Beton Dermaga  Data Perencanaan

Mutu Baja Tulangan Dermaga  Data Perencanaan

Mutu Tiang Pancang  Data Perencanaan untuk menghitung kekuatan Tiang

JETTY FENDER & FOUNDATION /

4500 5300 5300 5300 5300 5400 3500

UPPER JETTY INSPECTION

UNDER JETTY STRUCTURE

Kerusakan Pada Pelat Bagian Bawah

Foto Mikrometer Pelat Bagian Bawah

Foto Mikrometer Pelat Bagian Bawah

FOTO PENGUKURAN LEBAR RETAK

Hasil Pembacaan Kedalaman Retak dan

JARAK PEMBACAAN ULTRASONIC KEDALAMAN LEBAR

1 PELAT RPK - 1 CD → 9 100 107.3 179.8 81.2 0.2

2 PELAT RPK - 2 BC → 27-28 100 130.6 236.0 56.9 0.1

3 PELAT RPK - 3 MN → 27-28 100 128.1 245.0 35.9 0.19

4 PELAT RPK - 4 CD → 39-40 100 113.1 217.0 34.5 0.2

5 PELAT RPK - 5 CD → 57-58 100 82.6 145.6 65.1 0.14

6 PELAT RPK - 6 AB → 78-79 100 108.6 182.6 80.1 0.18

Rata-rata 59.0 0.168333

Hasil Pembacaan Kedalaman Retak dan Pengukuran Lebar Retak pada

JARAK PEMBACAAN ULTRASONIC KEDALAMAN LEBAR

1 PELAT RPS - 1 BC → 6-7 100 213.0 380.2 61.0

2 PELAT RPS - 2 CD → 6-7 100 116.2 280.4 Retak Tembus

3 BALOK RBS - 1 BC → 7 100 95.5 175.6 51.0

4 PELAT RPS - 3 CD → 17-18 100 98.6 178.2 56.9 0.22

5 BALOK RBS - 2 CD → 18 100 120.4 285.2 Retak Tembus 0.20

6 PELAT RPS - 4 BC → 41-42 100 136.7 285.0 Retak Tembus 0.36

7 BALOK RBS - 3 BC → 42 100 138.7 240.2 70.8 0.20

8 BALOK RBS - 4 CD → 42 100 109.3 271.0 Retak Tembus 0.30

9 PELAT RPS - 5 BC → 78-79 100 219.0 320.0 128.2 0.20

10 PELAT RPS - 6 CD → 78-79 100 104.4 164.7 100.8

11 PELAT RPS - 7 D → 78-79 100 132.6 270.5 Retak Tembus

Rata-rata 78.1 0.246667

Penggambaran Pola Retak Pelat Bawah Zone – I & Zone II

Zone – III Zone – IVA

CRANE & CABLE TRAY

PUMP AND NOZZLE

CODE & REFERENCE

LABORATORY TEST PERMEABILITY TEST

Rebar Tensile Test

 Data Evaluation for pile condition

Jumlah TP yang tidak dapat

Presentase kondisi yang rusak

Struktur bangunan Trestle dan Jetty di DUKS Gresik dihasilkan nilai

Tabel Batasan Nilai Potensial Tulangan sesuai ASTM C 876

Nilai Potensial Kondisi Tulangan

> - 200 mV Kemungkinan korosi < 10 %

- 200 mV s/d – 350 mV Korosi tidak menentu

< -350 mV Tingkat korosi bisa mencapai 90%

Bagian Atas Bagian Bawah

Alternatif I Alternatif II Alternatif III