TINJAUAN LI
Nama Mahasiswa:
Pertanyaan penelitian yang ingin diselidiki:
Kata kunci:
pertanian. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara dan Kebijaka
1
Metadata Artikel
Penulis Tahun Problem Penelitian
M. Zainul Abidin 2021 Uraikan gappenelitian yang
dijelaskan penulis dalam
artikelnya. Gap dapat berupa
gap teoritik atau gap empirik
(berbasis data). Penulis
tertarik untuk mengetahui
dampak pandemi Covid-19
terhadap produktivitas
tenaga kerja sektor pertanian
dan program PEN yang dapat
mendukung produktivitas
tenaga kerja sektor
pertanian. Metode penelitian
ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif
menggunakan data sekunder.
Latar Belakang Studi
Pertanyaan
Hipotesis Penelitian
Penelitian
Apa thesis/problem Apa hipotesis penelitian
statement atau yang diuji dalam penelitian
pertanyaan penelitian ini?
yang sedang anda gali
dari literatur yang
sudah anda cari dan
baca? Apakah covid
19 berdampak pada
produktivitas tenaga
kerja sektor
pertanian ?
 TINJAUAN LITERATUR TERSTRUKTUR

gan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(2), 117-138.

Metodologi
Karakteristik Variabel yang Diteliti Teknik Analisis
Cakupan Penelitian Desain Penelitian
Sampel dan Pengukurannya Data
Apakah ada konteks Uraikan desain Uraikan Uraikan variabel-variabel Uraikan bagaimana
tertentu/cakupan yang penelitian dan prosedur karakteristik yang diteliti dan bagaimana cara penulis
berlaku/membatasi studi yang diterapkan dalam sampel penelitian cara mengukur, dan melakukan analisis
ini? penelitian ini (utamanya mengevaluasi alat ukur yang data
informasi digunakan
demografis)
 Pembahasan
Temuan
Inkonsistensi Limitasi
Penelitian
Uraikan secara Apakah ada Apa saja yang
singkat temuan inkonsistensi atau perlu diuji lebih
penelitiannya argumentasi yang lanjut karena
bertentangan dari bukti yang kurang,
berbagai literatur tidak meyakinkan,
yang sudah anda kontradiktif, atau
baca? Seperti apa terbatas dari
inkonsistensi/argum literatur yang
entasi yang anda baca?
bertentangan tsb?
Nama Mahasiswa: Rizqy Amelia Zein
Intervensi seperti apa yang dapat menekan perilaku pelanggaran norma/moral di media sosial?
Kata kunci: intervensi, norma, ujaran kebencian, trolling, cyberbullying, moral courage

1 Álvarez-Benjumea, A., & Winter, F. (2018). Normative change and culture of hate: An experimen

Metadata Artikel Latar Belakang Studi

Pertanyaan
Penulis Tahun Problem Penelitian Hipotesis Penelitian
Penelitian
Álvarez-Benjumea, A., & 2018 The authors were interested Do heavily censoring It was assumed that
Winter, F. in finding out whether certain unwanted comments individuals would be less
norms (descriptive - what on social media likely to drop hateful
others usually do, or injuctive reduce the occurrence comments and therefore,
- what happens to the norms of hostile more likely to conform to
violators) could differently comments/hate the group norms when the
affect the occurrence of norm speech? abhorrent comments are
transgression. moderately censored.
 TINJAUAN LITERATUR TERSTRUKTUR
a sosial?

re of hate: An experiment in online environments. European Sociological Review, 34(3), 223-237.

Metodologi
Variabel yang Diteliti
Cakupan Penelitian Desain Penelitian Karakteristik Sampel
dan Pengukurannya
The research was The authors compared hate 180 participants were The authors measured their
conducted in Germany so speech scores of three different included in this study, dependent variable (hate
that it definitely has a experimental conditions; and more than a half speech score) by asking
specific geographical and extremely censored (allowing (55%) were women, three independent coders to
cultural coverage so that positive comments only), censored mostly (42%) aged assess whether participants'
the research design as (deleting all derogatory comments, between 25-34 y.o., and response to the picture
laid out according to this yet allowing both positive and mostly (29%) were could be considered a hate
specific coverage. neutral comments), and counter- students. speech. Coders was asked to
speaking (reprimanding hateful rate from 1 (very friendly) to
comments by giving explicit 9 (very hostile) for each
punitive measures). After participants' comment.
randomly assigning participants Krippendorf’s α was then
into three different groups, performed to measure
participants were asked to give interrater reliability.
comments on 9 controversial
pictures that were previously
selected in a preliminary study.
7.

gi Pembahasan
Teknik Analisis
Temuan Penelitian Inkonsistensi Limitasi
Data
The authors testes The authors found that No inconsistency or There was not enough evidence to
their hypotheses by descriptive norms contradictory findings could conclude that reactance is a cause of a
performing linear- (censoring) are be found. The findings more prevalent hate speech (in
mixed model, where substantially more supported multiple previous extremely censored condition) as it
topics and pictures as influential in decreasing the research that heavily requires two requirements; participants
random factors and occurrence of hate speech censoring unwanted contents must believe that their freedom is
no fixed factor. than injunctive norms on social media might entice threatened and perceive that this
(actively confronting the psychological reactance and freedom is salient to them. Both were
violators). therefore it’s a less effective missing in the research design.
strategy to reduce hostility on
social media.