Publikasi di Jurnal

Internasional
Ari Probandari

Tea-Time Webinar, ICE-EBM Network, 05.06.2021

Pengalaman Publikasi di Jurnal Internasional
Bereputasi

Section
Editor
Reviewer

Penulis
Proses Publikasi di Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi

Submission Editor Rejected

Peer Review

Provisionally Editor
Accepted Rejected

Request revisions

Editor Authors' responses

and revisions

Peer Review Editor Rejected

Accepted Author may send an

appeal letter
 Hal-hal yang dikaji oleh Editor saat menerima
suatu manuskrip
• Apakah topik manuskrip sesuai dengan cakupan tema jurnal?
• Apakah ”story”-nya masih menarik dan mengandung kebaruan?
• Apakah ada plagiasi?
• Apakah penulis taat format?
• Apakah penulis menggunakan standar penulisan manuscript yang sesuai
dengan disain penelitian?
• Apakah metode dijelaskan dengan jelas?
• Apakah ada banyak typo?
• Bagaimana dengan tingkat similarity-nya?
 Hal-hal yang harus dicek oleh reviewer
terhadap suatu manuskrip
• Apakah ada novelty?
• Apakah metodologi yang dipakai tepat untuk menjawab tujuan
penelitian?
• Apakah analisis data sesuai?
• Apakah penulisan unsur manuskrip jelas?
• Apakah bahasa yang digunakan sesuai dengan standar publikasi
ilmiah?
 Kesalahan-kesalahan yang sering dilakukan oleh
penulis dari “low and middle income countries”
• Tidak taat standard penulisan manuskrip
• Introduction tidak menunjukkan “gap of knowledge”
• Metode penelitian tidak detil dan jelas
• Penulisan tidak sesuai untuk academic writing
• Tidak membahas implikasi hasil riset
• Penulis memakai referensi yang tidak up-to-date/bukan referensi internasional
• Bahasa Inggris tidak standar
• Ceroboh menulis, banyak typo
• Judul yang membosankan
 Tips Publikasi di Jurnal Internasional

Perencanaan Publikasi

Penulisan Manuskrip

Submission Manuskrip dan Merespon Reviewer

Perencanaan Publikasi
Do I have a story to tell?
• What story?
• A research project can produce more than one story to write.
• Planning the story can be done since we write the research proposal.
• Prevent yourself from salami/divided publication.
Which journal(s) you will target?
• Recognize it early, when you search for references for your manuscript
• Consider the relevance with the journal aim and scope
• If you target journals under SCOPUS index, check:
https://www.scimagojr.com/
• If you target journals under Web of Science index, check:
http://mjl.clarivate.com/
• Consider impact factor:
https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Crv_JCR_First-Impact-Factor-List_
2018_A4_v3.pdf
• Search for information about the average time needed since submitted to
publication
• Be careful with predatory journals
How to check predatory journals or
publishers?
• Beall’s List (up to January 2017)
• https://web.archive.org/web/20170111172306/https://scholarlyoa.com/publ
ishers/
• https://web.archive.org/web/20170111172309/https://scholarlyoa.com/indiv
idual-journals/
• https://beallslist.weebly.com/
• https://predatoryjournals.com/journals/
• https://predatoryjournals.com/publishers/
Check list: THINK.CHECK.SUBMIT
http://thinkchecksubmit.org/check/.

• Do you or your colleagues know the journal?

• Can you easily identify and contact the publisher?
• Is the journal clear about the type of peer review it uses?
• Are articles indexed in services that you use?
• Is it clear what fees will be charged?
• Do you recognize the editorial board?

Laine C, Winker MA. Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. Biochem Med (Zagreb).

2017;27(2):285-291. doi:10.11613/BM.2017.031
Laine C, Winker MA. Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. Biochem Med (Zagreb).
2017;27(2):285-291. doi:10.11613/BM.2017.031
How to ensure the relevance of your
manuscript with the journal’s aim and
scope…
• Learn the aim and scope of the journal from its website
• Relevance checking machine – available in some publishers
• https://journalfinder.elsevier.com/
• https://journalsuggester.springer.com/
• Write an email to the editorial office
When you decided the target journal...
• Download the guideline for authors
• Study it carefully
• Adhere the guideline
Penulisan Manuskrip
Prepare your manuscript carefully…
• Format
• Structure, depend on the type of publications:
• Letters
• Rapid communication
• Review (Narrative/Systematic)
• Original article
• Methods paper
• Grammar and writing (consult for a professional English editing
service)
• Read – Edit – Read – Edit – Read - Edit
Generic Format of an Original Research
Paper
IMRAD

Introduction – Methods – Results – and -

Discussion
Introduction
• The importance of your research
• What have been known about the theme of research?
• What is the gap of knowledge?
• What does your study add the current knowledge?
• State the objective of your study
Methods
• What was the research setting?
• What was the study design?
• Who were the subjects of your study?
• What data did you collect?
• What procedure did you follow?
• Ethics
• Use the existing checklist for ‘report writing guideline’ (for health
research, check: http://www.equator-network.org
Results
• Systematic
• Use proper table – graphs - narrative
• http://www.edita
ge.com/insights/t
ips-on-effective-u
se-of-tables-and-f
igures-in-researc
h-papers
Good Table
• Clear title
• Self contained, can be
understood without any
explanatory text

www.editage.com/insights/tips-on-effective-use-of-tables-and-figures-in-research-
papers
Good Figure
• Informative title
• Clear labels
• Acknowledge the
source
• 2 dimensional

www.editage.com/insights/tips-on-
effective-use-of-tables-and-figures-in-
research-papers
Discussion and Conclusions
• What are the study major findings
• Comparation with other previous studies
• What is the significance/implication of the results
• Study limitations
• Further recommendations
Judul Penelitian
• Spesifik: mencerminkan penelitian yang (akan/sudah) dilakukan
• Title styles:
• Subject matters
• Result summary

Writing a scientific research article.

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/biology/ug/research/paper.html
Judul: ‘subject matters’
Judul: ‘subject matters’
Judul: ‘result summary’
Judul: ‘result summary’
Submission Manuskrip dan Merespon
Reviewer
What documents should be prepared
prior to submission?
• Letter to editor --- SELL YOUR STORY
• Main manuscript --- PREPARE AS PER GUIDELINE
• Title page –- AUTHORS NAME AND AFFILIATION, ABSTRACT,
CONTACTS, NUMBER OF WORDS etc.
How to response reviewers?
• Polite
• Points by points
• Show the revisions
Etika Publikasi
Authorship
‘Authorship credit should be based on 1) substantial contributions to
conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and
interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content; and 3) final approval of the version to
be published. Authors should meet conditions 1, 2, and 3.
When a large, multicenter group has conducted the work, the group
should identify the individuals who accept direct responsibility for the
manuscript .
Acquisition of funding, collection of data, or general supervision of
the research group alone does not constitute authorship.’

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical
journals. http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html (diakses pada 3 Nov 2010).
Urutan Authorship
• Urutan dalam authorship harus merupakan kesepakatan para authors
• Penulis pertama (principal author): kontribusi terbesar dalam penelitian, termasuk
dalam penulisan naskah publikasi
• Penulis terakhir: berkontribusi secara signifikan dalam memberi saran-saran
selama proses penelitian dan menyusun naskah publikasi (senior author) (Bennet &
Taylor, 2003).

Bandhari,M., Einhorn, T.A., Swiontkowski, M.F. & Heckman, J.D. (2003). Who did what?: (Mis)Perceptions about author’s contributions to scientific articles
based on order of authorship. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgical Surgery, 85, 1605-1609.
Bennet,D.M. & Taylor, D.M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15, 263-270.
 Penyimpangan Authorship
• Guest authorship
• ‘gift, honorary or unjustified authorship’
• Orang yang tidak berkontribusi terhadap penelitian maupun penulisan dan tidak memeriksa
naskah
• Ghostwriter
• Seseorang yang berperan signifikan dalam produksi suatu naskah ilmiah namun tidak
dicantumkan sebagai author
• Pressured authorship/the White Bull Effect
• Seseorang yang menggunakan kewenangan yang dimilikinya untuk memaksa staf yang lebih
yunior untuk memasukkan namanya sebagai author, meskipun tidak memenuhi kualifikasi

Claxton, L.D. (2005b). Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research,589, 31-45.
Bennet,D.M. & Taylor, D.M. (2003). Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine, 15, 263-270.
Kwok, L.S. (2005). The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 554-556.
Plagiarisme
Pencegahan Plagiasi
• Kuotasi + sitasi referensi yang
benar
• Melakukan teknik parafrase +
sitasi referensi yang benar
• Melakukan teknik sintesis +
sitasi referensi yang benar
• Check dengan software
‘similarity’, misalnya Turnitin