jurnal bereputasi
Dr. Eng. Hendri Widiyandari, M.Si
17 Juli 2020
Dr.Eng. Hendri Widiyandari,M.Si
• Tempat/Tanggal lahir: Ponorogo/ 31 Juli 1975
• NIP : 197507311999032002
• Institusi : Universitas Sebelas Maret (2018 – now)
• Pendidikan:
• Doctoral: Hiroshima University Japan (2005 – 2008)
• Master : Institut Teknologi Bandung (2000 – 2002)
• Bachelor : Universitas Diponegoro (1993 – 1998)
• Pengalaman Kerja:
• Postdoctoral fellow di Hiroshima University Japan
(2008 – 2009)
• Dosen di Universitas Diponegoro (1999 – 2017)
OUTLINE
• Introduction
• Tahapan dalam publikasi ilmiah
• Apa yang boleh dan apa yang tidak boleh
dalam penulisan paper
• Strategi publikasi yang efisien
• Mengirim jurnal.
Strategi untuk menghasilkan paper di
jurnal bereputasi
Publish or perish
MOTIVASI
Keahlian
19
8
DIM (Draft Inventaris Masalah)
Introduction Discussion
Why did you do How does the study
the study? advance the field?
The ‘write’ order
Untuk kejelasan dan konsistensi maksimum, tulis manuskrip
Anda dalam urutan ini :
Not necessarily
Insufficient
data/results/more work 16% Out of scope 29%
needed
Insufficient
Methodological concerns 7% data/results/more work 6%
needed
N = 2,517 authors of rejected articles, received feedback, open-ended question, multiple answers possible, question 6
Pertimbangan dalam memilih Jurnal
• Publising frequency
• Impact Factor, SJR, Citescore
• Indexing & Abstracting
• Target Audience
• Aims and Scope
• Time from submission to published.
• Access (open or subscriber)
• Publication fee
• Publication type
34
Mengirim jurnal
MEN-SUBMIT ARTIKEL
Dear Prof…..
Please find our manuscript titled “…,” by …, which we submit for your consideration of publication as a
original research article/communication/review in ….
We also would like to suggest four potential reviewers, as indicated on the next page of this letter. They
are internationally recognized in the field of ….
Sincerely Yours,
Suggested Reviewers:
1.
2.
3.
4.
PROSES EDITORIAL
No
Novelty ? Reject
Yes
Reviewer No
Reject
Okay?
Yes
1. Major revision
2. Minor revision
3. Publish as it is
Yes
Accepted
Contoh Form Isian Reviewer
A1: The manuscript is acceptable as it is.
A2: The manuscript is acceptable after a few corrections or some revision.
B: The manuscript may become acceptable after major revision and must be reviewed by Editor.
C: The manuscript is not acceptable, because:
C1 It does not match the aim or search areas of this journal.
C2 English language is not fluent and precise.
C3 It does not follow Instruction to authors of this journal.
C4 Others ( )
QUESTIONS:
•Is this manuscript relevant to this journal?
•Is the originality of this manuscript high?
•Is this manuscript very reliable and have validity?
•Is the conclusion of this manuscript accurate?
•Is the title of this manuscript accurate?
Nasehat dari beberapa editor jurnal ternama
Deborah Sweet, editor of Cell Stem Cell and publishing director at Cell Press memberi nasihat
agar penulis menyediakan cukup waktu sebelum memulai menulis makalah untuk memikirkan
aliran logis dari penulisan. Ketika melakukan penulisan maka fokuskan pada penyusunan story
(cerita) yang mengalir secara logis, bukan berdasarkan kronologi eksperimen yang dilakukan.
Roger Watson, editor-in-chief, Journal of Advanced Nursing memberi nasehat agar jangan
menulis sambil melakukan perbaikan (edit). Buka halaman kosong pada computer lalu tulis
bab dan sub-bab yang anda pikir terbaik. Kemudian isi kalimat dibawah bab dan sub bab
tersebut ketika nanda memiliki ide. Target dapat menulis maksimal 500 kata per hari.
Tumpahkan semua ide manakala ide tersebut muncul. Lupakan dulu mengedit (memperbaiki).
Brian Lucey, editor, International Review of Financial Analysis menyampaikan nasehat agar
penulis meminta bantuan teman untuk mengecek makalah anda.
KEY SUCCESS
• High Novelty
• Write Properly
• Response Politely
34