Departemen Kimia FMIPA

Pusat Studi Biofarmaka Tropika LPPM

Unit Laboratorium Riset Unggulan LPPM

Strategi membuat artikel Ilmiah

yang dapat terpublikasi di
jurnal bereputasi baik

Mohamad Rafi

Webinar Publikasi Ilmiah: Strategi Penulisan Artikel Tembus Jurnal Bereputasi

Forum Mahasiswa Pascasarjana IPB & DKasRa IPB, 27 Mei 2023
Biosketch
Dosen dan peneliti di Departemen Kimia FMIPA dan
Pusat Studi Biofarmaka Tropika (TropBRC) LPPM IPB.
Saat ini diberi amanah sebagai Kaprodi S2/S3 Kimia, PIC
Lab Metabolomik, AR-Lab, dan Ketua Editor Jurnal Jamu
Indonesia TropBRC IPB. Selain itu juga sebagai Pengurus
Pusat Himpunan Kimia Indonesia 2023 dan Managing
Director I4
Penelitian yang dilakukan banyak di bidang
metabolomik dan kemometrik untuk pengembangan
metode kendali mutu, identifikasi senyawa penciri dan http://mra.staff.ipb.ac.id/

standardisasi tumbuhan untuk bahan baku obat

herbal/pangan. Email: mra@apps.ipb.ac.id
WoS : No Publication 78; H-index 10
Scopus : No Publication 99; H-index 13
GS : No Publication ± 110; H-index 19
Education
• S.Si - IPB University, Indonesia
• M.Si – IPB University, Indonesia
• Dr – Gifu University, Jepang
Materi

01 Ide untuk penelitian

02 Saya siap menulis artikel ilmiah

03 Motivasi menulis
Ide untuk penelitian
 Penelitian/Riset
Memperoleh ide untuk penelitian
• Keingintahuan

• Anda akan menemukan ide penelitian ketika anda

menemukan gap dalam pengetahuan yang ada saat ini atau
pertanyaan yang belum terjawab yang menarik bagi anda
 Penelitian/Riset
Justifikasi dan relevansi
Justifikasi penelitian: terkait dengan rasional penelitian, alasan
mengapa melakukan penelitian tersebut, termasuk di dalamnya
penjelasan untuk desain dan metode yang akan dipakai dalam
penelitian

Relevansi penelitian: penelitian harus bermanfaat secara ilmiah

dan sosial agar memenuhi syarat sebagai relevan

Mengapa penting kedua hal di atas?

• Meyakinkan pemberi dana hibah penelitian
• Dapat menulis artikel ilmiah yang baik sebagai keluaran
• Untuk memperoleh rekognisi saintifik dari komunitas ilmiah
• Untuk memperoleh penerimaan dari publik

Putri, SP. 2021. Scientific writing in Department of Chemistry IPB, 23 Oct 2021
 Penelitian/Riset

Applied research
To answer basic
To answer a solution
question and
(practical or principle)
advancement our
to a particular
understanding in
problem in society or
particular field of
industry --- problem-
research ---
based driven
curiosity driven

Basic research
 Memulai untuk menulis artikel ilmiah

• Ketahui kekuatan dan kelemahan anda

• Berpikir global: memahami posisi penelitian anda dalam
level global
• Dapatkan informasi tren penelitian dalam bidang anda,
topik yang hot, permasalahan terkini, isu yang harus
ditangani
• Pertimbangkan dengan baik dua poin penting dalam
merencanakan penelitian anda: justifikasi dan relevansi
• Memiliki visi yang kuat dan tata laksana waktu yang baik
dalam penelitian anda

Putri, SP. 2021. Scientific writing: tips and tricks in publishing in reputable journals. Department of Chemistry IPB University.
 Contoh
memperoleh
ide Penelitian

Penelitian Mandiri 2020

 Contoh
memperoleh
ide Penelitian

PDUPT 2015-2016
 Contoh
memperoleh
ide Penelitian

PDUPT 2018-2019
 Contoh
memperoleh
ide Penelitian

Project RKI IPB-ITB-UGM-Unair 2019

Saya siap menulis
artikel ilmiah
 Mengapa melakukan publikasi?

http://blogs.nature.com/ofschemesandmemes/2017/12/21/training-to-write-submit-and-publish-a-scientific-paper
 Jurnal Q1
• Q1 journals, also known as “top quartile” journals, are the highest-
ranking journals in a particular category or field. They represent the
top 25% of journals based on their citation impact factor. The
citation impact factor is a measure of how often articles in a
particular journal are cited by other researchers.
• Q1 journals are considered to be the most prestigious and influential
journals in their respective fields. They often have a rigorous peer-
review process and publish high-quality research that contributes
significantly to the advancement of their field.
• Q1 journals are highly regarded in the academic community and are
often considered a key metric of success for researchers. Publishing
in Q1 journals can significantly boost a researcher’s academic
reputation and help them secure funding or tenure.
• Additionally, Q1 journals often have a wider readership and greater
visibility than lower-ranked journals. This can increase the impact
and influence of a researcher’s work and contribute to the
advancement of their field.
 Jurnal Q1

• The quartile ranking of a journal is determined by the citation impact factor of the
journal in comparison to other journals in the same category or field. This ranking
is determined by several factors, including the number of citations a journal
receives, the quality of the citations, and the age of the citations.

• The process of calculating the quartile ranking involves dividing all the journals in
a particular category or field into four groups based on their citation impact factor.
The top 25% of journals are classified as Q1 journals, the next 25% as Q2, the
next 25% as Q3, and the bottom 25% as Q4.

• The quartile ranking is usually determined using databases such as Journal

Citation Reports (JCR) or Scopus. These databases provide a comprehensive list
of journals in various fields, along with their quartile ranking and other important
metrics such as the journal’s impact factor and total citations.
 Sebelum memulai menulis
"Write with precision, clarity
and economy. Every sentence
should convey the exact truth
as simply as possible."

Instructions to Authors
Ecology 1964
 Before you write your manuscript
Why does it matter?

Have I done something Is there anything

01 new and interesting?
02 challenging in my work?

Is my work related directly Have I provided solutions to

03 to a current hot topic? 04 some difficult problems?

If all answers are "yes," then you can start preparations for your
manuscript. If any of the responses are "no," you can probably submit
your paper to a local journal or one with lower impact
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/six-things-to-do-before-writing-your-manuscript
 Before you write your manuscript
When responding to these questions, keep in mind that reviewers are
using questionnaires in which they must respond to a questions:
• Does the paper contain sufficient new material?
• Is the topic within the scope of the journal?
• Is it presented concisely and well organized?
• Are the methods and experiments presented in the way that they can be replicated
again?
• Are the results presented adequately?
• Is the discussion relevant, concise and well documented?
• Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?
• Is the language acceptable?
• Are figures and tables adequate and well designed?, are there information duplicated?
are they too many?
• Are all references cited in the text included in the references list?
https://www.elsevier.com/connect/six-things-to-do-before-writing-your-manuscript
 3 important factors
Great papers come from great & focused research questions

Variable/
Outcome of samples
condition measurement
Paper yang OK
Guide your readers more effectively
What is the focus of your paper?
Why is it important?
Your research questions
Is it unknown, limitation, controversy?

What is your plan to achieve it?

Your aims How is it directly related to the
problem?

How does it answer the question?

Your conclusions
How does it advance the field?
 Link your ideas
• Phenolic compounds are known to contribute in the antioxidant
Your research activity of coffee. However, the roasting process may decrease
questions antioxidant activity of coffee, which is conferred by the
degradation of phenolic compounds

• In our study, a metabolomics approach was used to

Your aims investigate the influence of phenolic compounds on
antioxidant activity of coffee extracts.

• Our conclusion revealed that the higher roasting degree

Your conclusions showed a decrease in phenolic compounds and
antioxidant activity of coffee extracts
 Link your ideas
• Phenolic compounds are known to contribute in the antioxidant
Your research activity of coffee. However, the roasting process may decrease
questions antioxidant activity of coffee, which is conferred by the
degradation of phenolic compounds

• In our study, a metabolomic approach was used to

Your aims investigate the influence
Answer of phenolic compounds on
the question
antioxidant activity of coffee extracts.

• Our conclusion revealed that the higher roasting degree

Your conclusions showed a decrease in phenolic compounds and
antioxidant activity of coffee extracts
 Yang diinginkan editor jurnal

High quality
research
Increase
impact
Original and
novel research Well-designed study
Real-world applications Logically organized
Interesting to
journal’s readership
Manuscript
Manuscript
Manuscript
 Tell a story

Introduction Methods Results Discussion

question answer
Experiment Result found to
done to answer answer question
question

The story also includes why question and answer are important and
how they fit with previous work
 Writing style
• Tujuan anda dalam menulis artikel ilmiah adalah bagaimana membuat pembaca
merasa nyaman dalam memahami informasi yang diberikan
• Buatlah sederhana, jelas, dan tanpa ambiguitas (organisasi yang efektif adalah
kuncinya)
• Asumsikan bahwa pembaca bukan expert di subyek yang dituliskan dalam artikel
ilmiah
• Kata: harus dipilih dan diatur agar artinya jelas (teliti, sederhana, dan penting)
• Kalimat: harus menyampaikan satu ide (sederhana dan langsung)
• Paragraf: harus dituliskan sebagai satu topik dengan pesan yang akan
disampaikan jelas (gunakan kalimat yang menjelaskan, mendukung, dan transisi
pada topik yang disampaikan)
• Alur: buat koneksi/transisi logis antara akhir tiap kalimat, paragraf, bagian
dengan yang berikutnya
• Pendekatan umum: pertama overview, lalu masuk ke detail
Manuscript
Manuscript
 Common mistakes
• Judul/Abstrak: tidak fokus atau terlalu detail, tidak mampu menarik ketertarikan membaca,
terlalu berlebihan dalam penjelasan atau terlalu umum sekali

• Pendahuluan: terlalu banyak informasi yang dituliskan (ringkasan yang acak dalam suatu
subyek) atau gagal untuk menunjukkan kesenjangan (gap) atau pertanyaan

• Metode: tidak memadai dalam hal detail prosedur sehingga dapat di replikasi oleh yang
berikutnya

• Hasil: desain gambar yang membingungkan, tidak menceritakan secara mudah agar bisa
mengikuti cerita tentang hasil, pengulangan* dengan bagian lain dari artikel ilmiah
* mendiskusikan hasil (sampaikan di bagian pembahasan saja)
* menuliskan detail metode (sampaikan di bagian metode saja)
• Pembahasan: pengulangan yang banyak dengan yang tertulis di hasil, terlalu banyak informasi,
transisi yang lemah, lalai terhadap riset sebelumnya, tidak terlalu mendalam
• Tidak mengikuti panduan jurnal yang dituju
…….contains the …….avoids the
following: following:
• Clarity • Repetition
• Conciseness • Redundancy
• Correctness • Ambiguity
(accuracy) • Exaggeration
Good writing
The key is to be as These are common
brief and specific as annoyances for
possible reviewers and
without omitting editors
essential detail
Motivasi menulis
artikel ilmiah
 Good writing hygiene

The more you write the easier it gets

• Protect your writing time
• Take steps to make yourself
accountable
• Binge writing is rarely
successful…write regularly
 Pengalaman pribadi
• Ide dapat berasal darimana saja, terutama banyak diperoleh saat mendengar atau
berdiskusi apapun dengan siapapun.
• Dalam mendesain riset oleh tim maupun mahasiswa bimbingan (S1/S2/S3) berorientasi
yang bisa untuk publikasi (artikel ilmiah, paten, atau apapun jenis publikasinya).
• Untuk proposal mahasiswa bimbingan, fokus di latar belakang dan metode agar dapat
langsung digunakan nantinya saat menulis artikel ilmiah.
• Selalu mengevaluasi data pada setiap langkah penelitian agar kuantitas maupun
kualitas terjaga sehingga memang layak terpublikasi.
• Perlu menyediakan waktu khusus walau hanya 60 menit untuk menulis maupun cek
tulisan artikel ilmiah mahasiswa bimbingan pasca, ada seorang Prof di UGM dengan
quote one day one paragraph ☺.
• Tidak terus terusan melakukan “excuse”, belum sempat, tidak tahu mulai darimana,
apakah layak datanya, kalau terkait data tinggal cek di jurnal yang mau dituju apakah
ada yang datanya juga tidak jauh berbeda dengan yang kita punya.
 Sumber Utama

• McGowan. 2012. How to Write for and Get Published in Scientific Journals.
www.fapesp.br/eventos/2012/03/howtowrite/daniel.pdf
• Robbens J. 2016. Effectively Communicating Your Research. Springer Nature.
Workshop
• Robbens J. 2018. Effectively Communicating Your Research. Nature Research
Academies. Workshop
• SS Achmadi. 2021. Teknik Menyusun Proposal Penelitian.
• dan sumber lainnya
TERIMA KASIH
THANK YOU

Departemen Kimia FMIPA

Pusat Studi Biofarmaka Tropika LPPM
Unit Laboratorium Riset Unggulan LPPM