if + condition, result/consequence
result/consequence + if + condition
If you had remembered to invite me, I would have attended your party.
3
(Jika kamu ingat mengundang saya, saya akan hadir di pestamu.)
Negatif if + condition
Rumus: ifnot dapat digantikan dengan unless.
if di tengah kalimat:
result/consequence + if/when + condition
If di tengah kalimat:
result/consequence + if + condition
Negatif if + condition
Rumus: ifnot dapat digantikan dengan unless.
If di tengah kalimat:
result/consequence + if + condition
Negatif if + condition
Rumus: ifnot dapat digantikan dengan unless.
(+) Fakta:
but I dont have much hope it will rain (tapi saya tidak punya cukup keyakinan bahwa
besok akan hujan)
If Nisa studied hard, she would pass.
(Jika Nisa belajar keras, dia akan lulus.)
Fakta:
but Nisa doesnt study hard (tapi Nisa tidak belajar keras.)
Fakta:
but I dont have much money (tapi saya tidak punya banyak uang)
Fakta:
but Im not a millionaire (tapi saya bukan seorang milioner)
(-) If Nisa didnt study hard, she would fail. atau Unless Nisa studied hard, she would fail.
(Jika Nisa tidak belajar keras, dia akan gagal.)
(?) If you had much money, would you buy a sport car?
If di tengah kalimat:
result/consequence + if + condition
If you had remembered to invite me, I would have attended your party.
(Jika kamu ingat mengundang saya, saya akan hadir di pestamu.)
(+) Fakta:
Fakta:
If the waitress had been careful, she wouldnt have broken many plates.
(Jika pelayan tersebut hati-hati, dia tidak akan memecahkan banyak piring.)
(-) Fakta:
but the waitress wasnt careful
(tapi pelayan tersebut tidak hati-hati)
If he had asked you for forgiveness, would you have forgiven him?
(Jika dia meminta maaf kepadamu, akankah kamu memaafkannya?)
(?) Fakta:
but he didnt ask you for forgiveness
(tapi dia tidak meminta maaf)
If
you (S) had (V) saved
your gold in a safety
deposit box, it
wouldnt have gone.
(Jika kamu telah
menyimpan emasmu
di safety deposit box,
emasmu tidak akan Had (V) you (S) saved your gold in a safety deposit box, it wouldnt have
hilang.) gone.
Conditional Sentences
Rules You Need to Know
GRAMMARLY
Its important to use the correct structure for each of these different conditional sentences
because they express varying meanings.
Use a comma after the if-clause when the if-clause precedes the main clause.
Conditional sentences are statements discussing known factors or hypothetical situations and their
consequences. Complete conditional sentences contain a conditional clause (often referred to as the if-
clause) and the consequence. Consider the following sentences:
What Are the Different Types of Conditional Sentences? There are four different types of conditional
sentences in English. Each expresses a different degree of probability that a situation will occur or
would have occurred under certain circumstances.
Lets look at each of these different types of conditional sentences in more detail.
Secondly, notice that the words if and when can be used interchangeably in these zero conditional
sentences. This is because the outcome will always be the same, so it doesnt matter if or when it
happens.
Note that we use the simple present tense in the if-clause and simple future tense in the main clause
that is, the clause that expresses the likely outcome. This is how we indicate that under a certain
condition (as expressed in the if-clause), a specific result will likely happen in the future. Examine
some of the common mistakes people make using the first conditional structure:
Explanation: Use the zero conditional (i.e., simple present + simple present) only when a certain
result is guaranteed. If the result is likely, use the first conditional (i.e., simple present + simple
future).
If I owned a zoo, I might let people interact with the animals more.
Notice the correct way to structure second conditional sentences is to use the simple past tense in the
if-clause and an auxiliary modal verb (e.g., could, should, would, might) in the main clause (the one
that expresses the unrealistic or unlikely outcome). The following sentences illustrate a couple of the
common mistakes people make when using the second conditional:
Explanation: When applying the second conditional, use the simple past tense in the if-clause.
If I owned a zoo, I will let people interact with the animals more.
If I owned a zoo, I might let people interact with the animals more.
Explanation: Use a modal auxiliary verb in the main clause when using the second conditional mood
to express the unlikelihood that the result will actually happen.
If you had told me you needed a ride, I would have left earlier.
These sentences express a condition that was likely enough, but did not actually happen in the past.
The speaker in the first sentence was capable of leaving early, but did not. Along these same lines, the
speaker in the second sentence was capable of cleaning the house, but did not. These are all conditions
that were likely, but regrettably did not happen.
Note that when using the third conditional, we use the past perfect (i.e., had + past participle) in the if-
clause. The modal auxiliary (would, could, shoud, etc.) + have + past participle in the main clause
expresses the theoretical situation that could have happened.
If you would have told me you needed a ride, I would have left earlier.
If you had told me you needed a ride, I would have left earlier.
Explanation: With third conditional sentences, do not use a modal auxiliary verb in the if-clause.
Explanation: The third conditional mood expresses a situation that could have only happened in the
past if a certain condition had been met. Thats why we use the modal auxiliary verb + have + the past
participle.
The action in the if-clause is the aspirin easing the headache, which will take place only after the
speaker takes them later that night.
The verb phrase were to is sometimes used in conditional sentences when the likely or unlikely result
is particularly awful or unthinkable. In this case, were to is used to place emphasis on this potential
outcome. Consider these sentences:
If she were to be late again, she would have to have a conference with the manager.
If the rent were to have been a penny more, they would not have been able to pay it.
Note that the emphatic were to can be used to describe hypothetical scenarios in the present, future,
and past.
Use a comma after the if-clause when the if-clause precedes the main clause.
ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION
Analytical Exposition Text merupakan jenis teks yang banyak kita jumpai dalam bacaan sehari-hari
walaupun tidak semua orang tahu bahwa yang kita bacaa itu sebenarnya adalah jenis teks ini.
Analayitical exposition text merupakan jenis teks yang berisikan pendapat-pendapat mengenai sesuatu
baik benda, tempat, atau kejadian. Nah, pada kesempata kali iniMedia Belajar Bahasa Inggris akan
membahas mengenai analytical exposition text. Untuk sobat ketahui bahwa analytical exposition text
merupakan jenis teks argumentative text, seperti Hortatory Exposition Text. Untuk lebih jelasnya mari
kita lihat penjelasan mengenai analytical exposition text berikut ini. Semoga bermanfaat. Check this
out!!!
Tujuan komunikatif dari analytical exposition text adalah untuk meyakinkan pembaca bahwa topik yang
dihadirkan adalah topik yang penting untuk dibahas atau mendapat perhatian dengan cara pemberian
argumen-argumen atau pendapat-pendapat yang mendukung ide pokok atau topik tersebut.
Struktur kebahasaan analytical exposition text terdiri dari tiga bagian yaitu:
1. Thesis
Di bagian Thesis, penulis memperkenalkan topik atau ide pokok yang akan dibahas. Thesis selalu
berada di paragraf pertama dalam analytical exposition text.
2. Argument
Di bagian ini penulis menghadirkan argumen-argumen atau pendapat-pendapat yang mendukung
ide pokok penulis teks tersebut. Biasanya dalam sebuah analytical exposition text terdapat lebih
dari dua argumen. Semakin banyak argumen yang ditampilkan, semakin membuat pembaca
percaya bahwa topik yang dibahas oleh penulis adalah topik yang sangat penting atau
membutuhkan perhatian.
3. Reiteration
Bagian ini merupakan bagian penutup dari sebuah analytical exposition text yang selalu terletak
di akhir paragraf. Reiteration berisi penulisan kembali atau penempatan kembali ide pokok yang
terdapat di paragraf pertama. Reiteration juga biasa disebut dengan conclusion atau kesimpulan.
Dalam sebuah analytical exposition text, terdapat beberapa ciri-ciri kebahasaan seperti di bawah ini,
yaitu:
menggunakan simple present
mengunakan reltional process
menggunakan internal conjunction
menggunakan casual conjuction
Untuk melengkapi dan memperkuat pemahaman anda mengenai analytical exposition text, sengaja
penulis sertakan contoh beserta terjemahan seperti berikut ini.
Cars Should Be Banned
(Thesis)
Cars should be banned in the city. As we all know, cars create pollution, and cause a lot of road deaths
and other accidents.
(Argument 1)
Firstly, cars, as we all know, give contribution to the most of the pollution in the world. Cars emit deadly
gas that causes illness such as bronchitis, lung cancer, and triggers off asthma. Some of these illnesses
are so bad that people can die from them.
(Argument 2)
Secondly, the city is very busy. Pedestrians wander everywhere and cars commonly hit pedestrains in
the city, which causes them to die. Cars today are our roads biggest killers.
(Argument 3)
Thirdly, cars are very noisy. If you live in the city, you may find it hard to sleep at night, or to concentrate
on your homework, and especially when you talk to someone.
(Reiteration)
In conclusion, cars should be benned from the city for the reason listed.