RANGKUMAN
Link drive buku dan jurnal dibawah ini.
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1uRx-eQobu4feI6XksBp2Sa1l7xr3y3-p?usp=share_link
JURNAL
a) Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Practical Understandings
analyzed their responses according to the defini-tions of communicative
competence set forth by Canale and Swain . She reported that teaching
assistants did not conceptualize lan-guage according to this particular
model of CC.
Instead, the participants relied on grammar at the expense of
communicative activities.
Even teachers committed to CLT often seem to show a very superficial
adherence to CLT princi-ples. As Nunan discovered, although the teachers
in his study had goals for communicative classrooms, they offered students
few opportuni-ties for genuine communicative language use in the class
sessions that he recorded. Although the lesson plans of these teachers
might have con-formed to the sorts of communicative principles advocated
in the CLT literature, the actual pat-terns of classroom interaction
resembled tradi-tional patterns rather than what he identified as genuine
interaction. Karavas-Doukas re-ported similar findings in the responses of
14
Greek teachers of English to an attitude survey and in the observations she
made of their class-rooms. She found that the survey results leaned toward
agreement with CLT principles, but when she observed the classroom
teaching environ-ments, «classroom practices deviated considerably from
the principles of the communicative approach» . Al-though she
acknowledged that there were glimpses of communicative approaches, the
teachers in her sample favored traditional ones.
In this case, traditional meant, «Most lessons were teacher-fronted and
exhibited an explicit focus on form» .
As indicated earlier, not all of the news is bleak.
Okazaki completed a longitudinal study using surveys to find out whether
preservice teachers changed their beliefs concerning CLT after a 1-year
methodology course.
It is interesting to note that Nunan and Kamaravadivelu offered evi-dence
that highlighted this specific issue within the L2 teaching profession. For
instance, Nunan identi-fied strategies, such as using referential questions
that could be used to increase the opportunities for genuine
communication, and Kumaravadi-velu increased from 5 to 10 the number
of macrostrategies that might now come to influ-ence the ideas of a
principled communicative approach . However, neither of the authors ex-
plained how the teachers adapted the referential questions or
macrostrategies into situation-spe-cific problems or how the teachers
developed their beliefs, knowledge, and practice with regard to CLT.
In order to reveal teachers' beliefs, knowledge, and practices about CLT, we
employed triangula-tion that included qualitative and quantitative data
sources of LOTE teachers' perspectives. Mathison argued that «the use of
any single method, just like the view of any single individual, will
necessarily be subjective and therefore biased» .
Participants
Ten state school teachers ofJapanese in 10 different state high schools in a
large Australian metropoli-tan area participated in this study .
The study of teachers’ beliefs has in the last 15 years emerged as a major
area of enquiry in the field of language teaching. One strand of this work
has focused on the relationship between teachers’ beliefs and their
classroom practices; more specifically, there has been interest in the
extent to which teachers’ stated beliefs correspond with what they do in
the classroom, and there is evidence that the two do not always coincide.
The present study is an attempt to fill this gap to investigate the teachers’
perceptions about the role of grammar teaching and the effectiveness of
various methods in grammar teaching.
Richards and Schmidt define needs analysis as a process of locating the
required instruction according to the needs and requirements of the
learners so that they could acquire a language. Moreover, the needs
analysis also refers to prioritizing those needs and helps in decision making
process.
The table below notes the highest mean 3.80 which is inclined to
agreement on the Likert scale showing that most of the participants
favored grammar instruction to be necessary in EFL instruction. The
teachers believed that students need to develop conscious knowledge
grammar since grammar helps in attaining accuracy in language.
In general, only a few teachers concentrate on only one of the four skills in
their language learning classrooms.
Most English teachers expect their language learners to develop their
communicative competence in reading, speaking, listening and writing
skills as the comprehensive outcomes and performances after completing
the language modules.
BUKU
Pendahuluan
Alasan penilitian : - Menurunnya minat belajar bahasa inggris materi Tata Bahasa
KAJIAN TEORI
- Ringkasan dari artikel terkait tentang implementasi RPT dalam pembelajaran Bahasa
Inggris di SMK
METODE
- Siklus 1
- Siklus 2
DAFTAR RUJUKAN