Anda di halaman 1dari 9

p-ISSN: 2599-1914 Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2023

e-ISSN: 2599-1132

IMPLEMENTATION OF THINK-PAIR-SHARE STRATEGY THROUGH DISCOVERY


LEARNING IN READING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT SMPN 1 TIRTAMULYA

Amalia Dwi Putri1), Yogi Setia Samsi2)

1)
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
2)
Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
e-mail: 1910631060147@student.unsika.ac.id

Abstrak
Membaca adalah salah satu aspek terpenting dalam perkembangan bahasa Inggris di sekolah.
Strategi atau metode pembelajaran memiliki peran penting untuk meningkatkan kemampuan
siswa dalam membaca teks deskriptif. Pembelajaran Think-Pair-Share dan Discovery
digunakan untuk memfasilitasi siswa dalam membaca teks deskriptif. Penelitian ini bertujuan
untuk mengimplementasikan pembelajaran Think-Pair-Share dan Discovery dalam membaca
teks deskriptif. Desain penelitian menggunakan studi kasus. Pesertanya adalah seorang guru
dan satu siswa di kelas bahasa Inggris kelas delapan. Sedangkan instrumen yang digunakan
untuk mengumpulkan data adalah lembar observasi dan pedoman wawancara. Dengan
demikian, peneliti menganalisis dengan menggunakan reduksi data, display data, dan
penarikan kesimpulan dan verifikasi. Temuan menunjukkan wawasan hasil positif dari
menggunakan strategi TPS dan metode pembelajaran penemuan ketika mengajar dan belajar
teks deskriptif. Kesimpulan berdasarkan observasi dan wawancara yang diberikan, peneliti
menyimpulkan bahwa strategi Think-Pair-Share dan metode penemuan adalah strategi dan
metode yang digunakan oleh guru bahasa Inggris untuk mengajar membaca teks deskriptif di
kelas delapan. Pendekatan kolaboratif ini tidak hanya meningkatkan kepercayaan diri siswa
tetapi juga mendorong mereka untuk lebih bersemangat dan mau memecahkan masalah
bersama. Strategi Think-Pair-Share melalui metode pembelajaran discovery terbukti
meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kemampuan pemahaman bacaan siswa.

Kata Kunci: Think-Pair-Share, Discovery Learning, Membaca, Teks Deskriptif

Abstract

Reading is one of the most crucial aspects of English language development in school.
Strategy or learning method has an important role to improve the students’ ability in reading
descriptive text. Think-Pair-Share and Discovery learning were used to facilitate students'
reading through descriptive text. The research intended to implement Think-Pair-Share and
Discovery learning in reading descriptive text. The research design used a case study. The
participants are one teacher and one student at English class of eighth grade. Meanwhile, the
instruments used to collect data are observation checklist and interview guide. Thus, the
researcher is analyzed by using data reduction, data display, and drawing conclusion and
verification. The findings show insight into the positive outcomes of employing the TPS
strategy and the discovery learning method when teaching and learning descriptive text. The

PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran)│x


PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran)
Vol x No x Tahun xxxx Hal x–xxx
conclusion based on the observations and interview provided, the researcher has concluded
that the Think-Pair-Share strategy and the discovery method are strategies and methods
utilized by English teacher to teach reading descriptive texts in the eighth grade classroom.
This collaborative approach not only boosts students' self-confidence but also encourages
them to be more enthusiastic and willing to solve problems together. Think-Pair-Share
strategy through the discovery learning method has been shown to better students' learning
outcomes and reading comprehension abilities.

Keywords: Think-Pair-Share, Discovery Learning, Reading, Descriptive Text

INTRODUCTION they just read at the end of the reading


exercise, indicating that they have not
Students must acquire four abilities established goals for themselves. As a
in order to be able in communication and result, at the end of the session, students
study english language: listening, were unable to accomplish the reading
speaking, reading, and writing. However, goal of comprehending the text and
reading is one of the most important parts answering the questions. If this condition
of their English language development. persists, pupils may appear more passive
Reading already recognize as an essential during the learning process, especially if
ability in foreign language acquisition. the teacher only wants them to read but not
Additionally, reading ability is indicated in comprehend.
the Junior High School Curriculum According to Okkinga et al. (2018)
(Kurikulum 2013). The aims of English reading strategy is a mental tool that a
teaching and learning are to assist students reader used to analyze, correct, or
in achieving functional literacy, which is understand the material. Reading strategies
the capacity to communicate in simple are a deliberate and goal-oriented endeavor
spoken and written English in everyday to generate meaning from text. When
situations. analyzing and evaluating what they read,
Every English lesson at school, students must employ a variety of
students learn about reading. According to strategies, including making conclusions
Karbalaei (2010), reading is a process in based on evidence. In reading assignments,
which one must not only understand its reading strategy was discovered that both
direct meaning but also comprehend its local methods such as commenting on the
implicit notions. People read for a variety meaning of the work, pronunciation, or
of reasons (Anderson, 2014). They read grammatical interpretation, as well as
for enjoyment, knowledge, or to learn global strategies such as generating
something new. In all these circumstances, inferences and applying previous
the goal of reading is to get meaning or to information, were employed.
create the writer's meaning (Arabmofrad, The TPS strategy is designed to
Badi, Pitehnoee, 2020). provide students time and structure to
Nonetheless, many students think about a specific problem, followed
currently complain about having by being paired with a peer to discuss
difficulties comprehending English responses to said issue, and then
descriptive literature due to their synthesizing and expressing their
disorganized thinking and lack of perspectives with a group or the class
comprehension of the complete text's (Shih & Reynolds, 2015). Dwigustini and
content. Many students have no idea what

2
Amalia Dwi Putri, dkk. Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy trough Discovery…

Widiya (2020) stated that TPS strategy is a discovery learning method in reading
component of cooperative learning descriptive texts. TPS strategy is used in
discussions. It is a basic technique that is learning to activate students through
highly beneficial to the teaching and discussions and sharing knowledge and
learning processes. experiences with their friends. Think-Pair-
The Think Pair Share (TPS) learning Share also gives students more time to
strategy may assist students improve their think, respond, and help each other. In
skills. TPS learning model produces more addition to the Think-Pair-Share strategy
pleasant learning outcomes than traditional in reading descriptive text research, the
learning model (Fatma et al., 2019). TPS teacher also uses the discovery learning
learning strategy allows students to work method so that students can improve their
independently or in groups and maximizes accuracy and skills.
their engagement during the learning
process in order to increase their Then, during the teaching-learning
collaboration skills and cognitive learning process, teachers require particular
results. TPS learning strategy also allows learning models suitable with the 2013
students adequate time to create questions, curriculum. In this study, the researcher
answer them, and express their answers to used Think-Pair-Share and Discovery
other students. As a result, knowledge will learning to implement students' reading
circulate more quickly among students abilities through descriptive text. One of
(Fatma et al., 2019). the genres taught to eighth-grade students
Apart from TPS strategy, according in the final semester of junior high school
to Nurdin et al. (2019) a teaching method is descriptive text in junior high school in
that involves students in a mental process West Java, Indonesia.
to discover knowledge called discovery
learning. It is a way to present a lesson that
involves students in a mental process to METHOD
discover knowledge, rather than simply
presenting all the information to them The type of research used is a case
(Nurdin et al., 2019). The method is study. A method of academic research that
centered on the students and the teacher's involves the intensive study of a particular
role are to adjust the learning atmosphere situation or phenomenon, often in a real-
to support the discovery process for the life context is a case study (Yin, 2017).
students. The research was conduscted at SMPN 1
The curriculum 2013's learning Tirtamulya, one state secondary school in
strategy is discovery learning. Discovery West Java, Indonesia. To gain the detail
learning, according to Holesinska (2006), information and data, the researcher used
is the most practical and motivating sort of two research instruments: observation and
active learning method, in which students interview. There are some instruments
must figure out rules and reveal the text which are used to collect the data. They
concept on their own. Discovery learning are:
is defined as a learning environment in 1. Observation checklist
which the learner must identify the The first collection of data
primary substance of what is to be learned instrument used in this study was
independently, forcing the student to a classroom observation setting,
become an active participant in their which the researcher observed
learning. twice. Observation, according to
In this research, to overcome these Ary et al. (2010), is a key
difficulties, learning to read in this study approach for acquiring qualitative
implement the TPS strategy through the data. First and foremost, the

3
PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran)
Vol x No x Tahun xxxx Hal x–xxx
researcher selected a classroom to researcher uses data reduction to
watch. The type of observation reduce unnecessary information
used by the researcher in this and organize the data so that the
study was non-participant final results can be validated.
observation. Non-participant 2. Data Display
observation, as defined by Hesse- After reducing the data, researcher
Biber (2016), is a means of creates a data display that contains
conducting an observation a compressed and well-organized
without engaging in the activity data set that allows conclusions to
being watched. be drawn. As a result, the
researcher can observe what is
2. Interview happening and decide whether to
The researcher interview one draw an appropriate conclusion or
teacher and one student. Interview continue the analysis based on the
was used to collect the second participants' interview responses as
instrument. A qualitative useful for research.
interview, according to Creswell 3. Conclusion drawing/verification
(2012), occurs when researcher The final and most important phase
ask one or more participants of data analysis is inference and
broad, open-ended questions and verification. Inference begins after
document their replies. To obtain the information has been collected
thorough information, the by developing a tentative inference.
researcher conducted semi- In other words, the inference is
structured (open ended) continually analyzed and validated
interviews. A semi-structured to obtain the appropriate
interview is one in which the conclusion.
questions are pre-planned before
the interview, but the interviewer
uses open-ended questions to
allow the interviewee to clarify
and explain specific questions RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
(Blandford, 2013). The researcher
prefer semi-structured interviews A. Result
because researcher can prepare In the first section, the researcher
questions in advance. describes the results of observations made in
The researcher analysis the data the classroom, as well as the interactions
usinghree parts of analysis according to between the teacher and students. The
Miles and Huberman (1994), data analysis researcher then describes the results of an
entails three concurrent activities: data interview conducted with one English
reduction, data presentation, and teacher and one student.
conclusion drawing/verification.
1. Data Reduction 1. Observation
The researcher will select the a. First Meeting
important information from the 1. Preparation Step
data, and as data collection At the preparation activities in the
progresses, further stages of data first meeting, the teacher said
reduction will occur, writing greetings and it started at 08.50 am.
summaries, coding, selecting The teacher explains the purpose of
themes, clustering, partitioning, learning after students take
and drafting summaries. The attendance and decides on a topic

4
Amalia Dwi Putri, dkk. Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy trough Discovery…

based on the syllabus. Afterwards, The teacher convinces or asks


the teacher develops teaching the students to read carefully to
materials with the learning media make sure the students answer
used. The teacher also will assess the questions correctly and the
student learning outcomes. teacher gives the opportunity
2. Implementation Step for concepts, topics, and
a) Stimulation unfamiliar words from the
The teacher gives a number of descriptive text they have read.
questions that lead to f) Generalization and Sharing
preparation for learning The teacher asks students to
descriptive text and encourages draw conclusions but after they
students to read first the have answered the questions
reading sheet that has been that have been given and
given. The teacher also invites students to come
instructs students if there is forward to read the conclusions
anything they don't understand, from the descriptive text.
they can ask.
b) Problem Statement and b. Second Meeting
Thinking 1. Preparation Step
The teacher does not give as At the second meeting, the teacher
much text as possible to explains what will be learned and
identify, the teacher only gives determines the topic where
one descriptive text that is students are asked to make
relevant to the learning descriptive text independently. The
material. bell rang at the 10.10 am. After
c) Data Collection and that, the teacher develops teaching
Thinking materials by explaining briefly and
The teacher gives the the teacher will assess students at
opportunity to students to read the end of the lesson.
a sheet of descriptive text, 2. Implementation Step
students are not given the 1. Stimulation
opportunity to observe around The teacher starts teaching and
because they have been given encourages students to make
the text. In this section, their own descriptive text to
students have not been given read and the teacher asks
the opportunity to do a trial questions or clues that lead to
reading with their friends but solving problems such as the
only read by themselves. meaning of words. the teacher
d) Data Processing and Pairing also encourages students to
Students interpret the results of read worksheets or textbooks
reading the descriptive text to make it easier for students to
through the answers to compose texts and answer
questions that have been given student questions if anyone
by the teacher and students are asks.
able to exchange ideas with 2. Problem Statement and
their friends where previously Thinking
they were given the opportunity The teacher gives students the
to think independently. opportunity to identify relevant
e) Verification and Pairing descriptive texts as much as
possible to practice, facilitate,

5
PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran)
Vol x No x Tahun xxxx Hal x–xxx
and make students confident in result of interview below.
reading descriptive texts. Some answers from open questions:
3. Data Collection and
Thinking T1: “This strategy is one that can be said to
The teacher gives students the be natural for students to do, so even though
opportunity to read and I didn't tell them to "pair up," they have
observe descriptive texts in already worked with their peers or their best
books to collect data friends, and they have immediately worked in
independently first. pairs. So, I think this strategy is indeed more
4. Data Processing and Pairing natural, easier to do, and can also make the
The teacher gives the self-confidence of students who lack self-
opportunity for students to confidence become more enthusiastic, more
interpret descriptive text they willing to do things than do things on their
have made and students are own, so it's more supportive in helping
also allowed to work with students find, solve problems. problem in the
friends if necessary. descriptive text.”
5. Verification and Pairing
Students are allowed to work S1: “After sharing the answers, I find it easy
together and the teacher asks to do assignments or answer questions
students to do a careful because the Think-Pair-Share strategy
investigation to prove the through the discovery learning method
results of data processing and makes me active as a student and allows me
teacher provides an to apply the answers or ideas that I think
opportunity for students to find about and share my thoughts with my
a concept or understanding friends.”
through descriptive text.
6. Generalization and Sharing Based on the provided text, that the
The teacher asks students to Think-Pair-Share strategy is a natural and
conclude the descriptive text effective approach for students. It allows
they have read and students them to work with their peers or best
share ideas with their friends or friends, which makes the strategy more
pairs. If according to the natural and easier to implement. This
teacher the student is good at collaborative approach not only boosts
concluding the student will be students' self-confidence but also
given an appreciation in the encourages them to be more enthusiastic
form of scores and instruct the and willing to solve problems together.
student to read it in front of The Think-Pair-Share strategy is
his/her classmates. supportive in helping students find and
Based on the observations and solve problems in descriptive texts [T1]. It
explanations provided above, the supported by the statement from S1, who
researcher has concluded that the Think- shares their positive experience with the
Pair-Share strategy and the discovery Think-Pair-Share strategy. S1 mentions
method are strategies and methods utilized that this strategy makes them active as a
by English teacher to teach reading student, allows them to apply their ideas,
descriptive texts. and share their thoughts with friends [S1].
2. Interview According to Wijaya et al. (2021),
The implementation of using Think-Pair- Teaching students to read descriptive text,
Share through discovery learning in using the Think-Pair-Share (TPS)
descriptive text were analyzed from the technique helps improve their

6
Amalia Dwi Putri, dkk. Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy trough Discovery…

understanding of the material and responses of other students. This process


confidence. Student of the pair may be also teaches students how to clarify their
given a predetermined amount of time for ideas to a peer before presenting them to a
sharing his/her response (Badriyah, 2015). wider audience (the entirely class).
Thus, when the teacher divides the class The Think-Pair-Share strategy
into pairs or groups, the students will feel through the discovery learning method,
more at ease asking their friends in groups have been shown to better students'
without feeling embarrassed. learning outcomes and reading
comprehension abilities (Jannah &
Fu'adah, 2022). Based on data obtained
from the observations and interviews
T1: “I give an appreciation in the form of conducted above, the findings provide
a grade, then from there the student will insight into the positive outcomes of
feel confident and sure I have finished and employing the TPS strategy and the
I am right or I know "oh this is the right discovery learning method when teaching
answer" only after that I will ask the and learning descriptive text.
student to share the student's answer with
his/her partner or even classmates like
that, that's if one student has finished.”
CONCLUSION
S1: “With the Think-Pair-Share strategy
with the discovery learning method can The conclusion based on the
give students the opportunity to feel more observations and explanations provided,
comfortable sharing their thoughts.” the researcher has concluded that the
Think-Pair-Share strategy and the
The text T1 describes a teacher's approach discovery method are strategies and
to giving feedback to students. The teacher methods utilized by English teacher to
first gives a grade to the student, which teach reading descriptive texts in the eight
gives the student confidence in their grade classroom. The Think-Pair-Share
answer. Then, the teacher asks the student strategy is a natural and effective approach
to share their answer with a partner or for students that allows them to work with
classmates. This approach can be their peers or best friends, which makes
enhanced by using the Think-Pair-Share the strategy more natural and easier to
strategy, which allows students to feel implement. This collaborative approach
more comfortable sharing their thoughts. not only boosts students' self-confidence
The The Think-Pair-Share strategy is a but also encourages them to be more
method of collaborative learning in which enthusiastic and willing to solve problems
students work together to solve a problem together. The Think-Pair-Share strategy
or answer a question regarding an assigned through the discovery learning method has
reading. This technique challenges been shown to better students' learning
students to think independently about a outcomes and reading comprehension
topic or response to a question before abilities. The text also describes a teacher's
sharing their thoughts with peers. Think- approach to giving feedback to students,
Pair-Share helps pupils gain confidence, which involves giving a grade to the
encourages greater engagement, and student first, which gives the student
generally leads to deeper discussions. confidence in their answer, and then
Using the Think-Pair-Share technique asking the student to share their answer
provides students time for independent with a partner or classmates.
thought, thinking, and utilizing new
knowledge before being impacted by the
REFERENCES

7
PeTeKa (Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran)
Vol x No x Tahun xxxx Hal x–xxx
motivation based on the
Anderson, N. J. (2014). Developing implementation of discovery
Engaged Second Language learning modified with think pair
Readers. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. share learning model. International
M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Research Journal for Quality in
Teaching English as a second or Education, 6(1), 14-19.
foreign language (4th ed., pp. 170– Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2016). The Practice of
188). Boston, MA: Cengage Qualitative Research: Engaging
Learning. Students in the Research Process.
Arabmofrad, A., Badi, M., & Rajaee SAGE Publications.
Pitehnoee, M. (2020). The Holesinska, A. (2006). Teaching English
Relationship among Elementary as a Foreign Language to Students
English as a Foreign Language with Learning Difficulties.
Learners’ Hemispheric Dominance, Masaryk: Mararyk University
Metacognitive Reading Strategies Press.
Preferences, and Reading Jannah, N. S., & Fu’adah, N. S. (2022).
Comprehension. Reading &Amp; Improving Students’ Arabic Text
Writing Quarterly, 37(5), 413–424. Reading Skills Through Think Pair
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Share Type of Cooperative
Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction Learning Model. Review of Islamic
to research in education 8th Studies, 1(1), 28–34.
edition. Wadsworth: Cengage https://doi.org/10.35316/ris.v1i1.39
Learning. 5
Badriyah, S. M. (2015). Using Think Pair Karbalaei, A. (2010). A Comparison of the
Share Method to Improve the Metacognitive Reading Strategies
Reading Skill on Narrative Text Of Used by EFL and ESL Readers.
The Students Of MTSN Kunir The Reading Matrix: An
Blitar. Realita: Jurnal Penelitian International Online Journal, 10(2),
Dan Kebudayaan Islam, 13(1), 97– 165–180.
111. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994).
https://doi.org/10.30762/realita.v13 Qualitative Data Analysis: An
i1.55 Expanded Sourcebook. Journal of
Blandford, A. (2013). Semi-structured Environmental Psychology, 14(4),
qualitative studies. In Interaction 336–337.
Design Foundation. Nurdin, K., Muh, H. S., & Muhammad, M.
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint H. (2019). The Implementation of
/1436174/ Inquiry-Discovery Learning. Ideas:
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Journal on English Language and
research: Planning, conducting, and Learning, Linguistics and
evaluating quantitative and Literature, 7(1).
qualitative research (4th ed.). https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v7i1.
Boston, MA: Pearson. 734
Dwigustini, R., & Widiya, J. (2020). Think Okkinga, M., Van Steensel, R., Van
Pair Share Technique to Promote Gelderen, A., Van Schooten, E.,
Students’ Reading Comprehension. Sleegers, P., & Arends, L. R.
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) (2018). Effectiveness of Reading-
STKIP Kusuma Negara Jakarta. Strategy Interventions in Whole
Fatma, Z., Hasanuddin, S., Andalia, N., & Classrooms: a Meta-Analysis.
Zulfajri, M. (2019). Progress in Educational Psychology Review,
students’ critical thinking skills and 30(4), 1215–1239.

8
Amalia Dwi Putri, dkk. Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy trough Discovery…

Shih, Y., & Reynolds, B. L. (2015).


Teaching Adolescents EFL by
Integrating Think-Pair-Share and
Reading Strategy Instruction: A
Quasi-Experimental Study. RELC
Journal, 46(3), 221–235.
Wijaya, K., Raminingsih, N., & I Gede
Budasi. (2021). An Analysis of
Think-Pair-Share Strategy on
Google Classroom in Reading at
SMKN 1 Kuta Selatan. Jurnal
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Indonesia, 9(2), 90–100.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research
and Applications: Design and
Methods. SAGE Publications.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai