Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Jl. Raya Siman Ponorogo,

Jawa Timur Indonesia 63471

Article: Enhancing the Indonesian Translation of Qur’an Through Morphological and

Historical Semantic Analysis

Reviewer: Sujiat Zubaidi

No Description Notes from Reviewer

1. TITTLE
 Is the title of the article  Judul Cukup menarik, ada keyword Semantic
interesting? analysis. Analisis komparatif
 Is the title 'specific'?  Cukup spesifik

 Suggestions/notes for
titles?
2. NOVELTY AND ORIGINALITY:
 How is the  Novelty tulisan cukup baik
originality/authenticity of  Data yang tersaji cukup akurat dan faktual
ideas in this article?  Tapi belum dirumuskan secara sistematis sesuai
 How is the novelty of the dengan metode yang relevan
issue in this article?

 How accurate is the data

and the facts in this article?

 What are your suggestions

for novelty and originality to
this article?
3. ABSTRACT
 Does the abstract cover the  Abstrak belum secara jelas mencakup tujuan,
aims, methods, and results metode dan hasil
of the study/research?  Perlu dipertegas konten abstrak yang mencakup
 What are your suggestions ketiga hal di atas
for abstract?

4. KEYWORDS
 Are the keywords already  Tidak ada keywords yang ditulis
reflecting the  Perlu ditentukan keywords sesuai ketentuan
content/substance of the penulisan artikel yang baku, 3 – 5 kata
article?
 What are your suggestions
for keywords?
5. INTRODUCTION  Dalam pendahuluan, perlu diperjelas urgensi
 Has the introduction kajian dan masalah utama yang ditulis.
reflected the urgency and  Dimunculkan knowledge gap, kesenjangan
subject of the study? persoalan bagaimana yang hendak diurai dan
 What are your suggestions dicari jawab dalam tulisan ini. Masalah terjemah
for introduction? al-Quran yang bagaimana?

6. METHOD
 Is the analytical method
used in this article
appropriate?
 What are your suggestions
for method?
7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 Are the results and
discussion in accordance
with the research method?
 Have the results and
discussions answered the
problem formulation?
 What are your suggestions
for results and discussions?
8. CONCLUSION
 Have the conclusions
reflected the results of the
study?
 What are your
suggestions for conclusion?
9. REFERENCE
 Are the references used
adequate and support the
research?
 What are your
suggestions for reference?
10. Suggestions, recommendations
and overall notes
Article decision recommendation:
Accept Submission.
√ Revisions Required.
Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Jl. Raya Siman Ponorogo,
Jawa Timur Indonesia 63471
 Solusi apa yang ditawarkan dalam mengurai
problem tersebut. Analisis semantik dan
urgensinya, misalnya.
 Perlu dijelaskan secara eksplisit metode yang
digunakan.
 Pendekatan dan analisis semantik apa yang
relevan.
 Contoh yang digunakan cukup
representatif menuju hasil kajian: tafakkara
(fi’il) dan al-hakim (isim).
 Belum ada sub diskusi
 Perlu ditambahkan satu sub diskusi sblm
simpulan
 Dalam simpulan tidak perlu mengulang
pembahasan (adanya kontribusi Fazlur Rahman
cs)
 Simpulan paling tidak memuat, hasil penelitian,
mengemukakan kontribusi, keterbatasan kajian,
dan saran untuk penelitian lanjutan
 Referensi masih kurang. Analisis semantic dan
morfologi. Namun bku-buku semantik belum
ada dan kurang mencukupi.
 Perlu dimasukkan dan ditambah sebagai
referensi primer
 Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Jl. Raya Siman Ponorogo,
Jawa Timur Indonesia 63471

Resubmit for Review.

Resubmit Elsewhere.

Decline Submission.

Ponorogo, 3 November 2021

Reviewer

Sujiat Zubaidi

Note:
1. Review results can also be filled out directly online through the reviewer account at
https://ejournal.unida.gontor.ac.id/index.php/tsaqafah
2. Article forms and files that have been noted through the review facility on ms. word,
please upload in OJS or send to email: tsaqafah@unida.gontor.ac.id