Corrosion Management and Strategyfot Corrosion Handling

CORROSION
MANAGEMENT AND
STRATEGY FOR CORROSION HANDLING
BY. BAMBANG WIDYANTO

bambwid@cbn.net.id, bambwid98@gmail.com
CORROSION MANAGEMENT by BW/AS SASARAN UTAMA 18/09/2011
• PENGETAHUAN KOROSI • PENGETAHUAN MATERIAL

2 • Mengetahui mekanisme korosi dan
• Mengetahui jenis-jenis material
cara penanggulangannya
• Mengetahui sifat material berkaitan
• Menghindarkan terjadinya kerusakan
dengan penggunaan
karena korosi
• Mengetahui cara pemilihan material
• Mengurangi biaya maintenance
• Mengetahui aspek-aspek yang dapat
mendegradasi atau memperbaiki sifat
 PENGETAHUAN MEMANAGE DAN
material
MEMINIMALISIR DAMPAK KOROSI
• Mengetahui tanggung jawab setiap  PENGETAHUAN RESIKO
elemen perusahaan AKIBAT KOROSI
• Mengetahui faktor-faktor yang • Mengetahui ancamannya
berpengaruh terhadap produktivitas
• Mengetahui ancamannya
• Mengetahui manfaat pelaksanaan terhadap faktor safety
manajemen korosi yang benar • Mengetahui ancamannya
• Mengetahui dampak ekonomi dari korosi terhadap lingkungan
CORROSION MANAGEMENT by BW/AS 18/09/2011
3 HAL-HAL YANG HARUS DIKETAHUI UNTUK

MEMINIMALISIR DAMPAK KOROSI
• Mengetahui apa arti korosi
• Mengetahui mekanisme korosi
• Mengetahui bentuk-bentuk korosi
• Mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi korosi
• Mengetahui metoda pengendalian korosi
• Mengetahui cara-cara menginspeksi korosi
• Melakukan kegiatan pengendalian korosi secara sistimatis
4 PERMASALAHAN BILA ADA KEGAGALAN
HISTORY MATERIAL/PERALATAN
• Design
• Pemilihan material TANGGUNG
JAWAB
• Proses manufaktur MANUFACTURER
• Proses assembling
• DELIVERY
• Proses pemakaian
• Proses penggunaan TANGGUNG
JAWAB USER
• Proses perawatan
5
6 DEFINISI KOROSI
• Korosi adalah degradasi (perusakan atau penurunan

kwalitas) material akibat interaksi dengan lingkungan
• Untuk logam reaksinya disebut reaksi elektrokimia
PARAMETER PENYEBAB
7
KEGAGALAN
CREEP
BEBAN TEMPERATUR
KOROSI
WAKTU LINGKUNGAN
(F) BEBAN (statik/dinamik)

(t) WAKTU (panjang/pendek)
(T) TEMPERATUR (tinggi/rendah)
LINGKUNGAN (asam/basa/netral) BW
THE CORROSION CYCLE OF STEEL
8
CORROSION MANAGEMENT by BW/AS
Bijih logam 18/09/2011
Peleburan
9
Pemurnian Pemaduan/
pencampuran
Penambangan Pengecoran
bahan galian Barang
setengah
Daur jadi
ulang
Eksplorasi
Pembentukan
Barang
Bumi jadi
Pembuangan Barang Pemakaian
rusak
10
BENTUK-BENTUK KOROSI
11
Korosi seragam Korosi sumuran (pitting) Korosi celah
Penggetasan hidrogen
Korosi tegangan Korosi batas butir Korosi erosi Korosi mikrobial

12
Metoda penanggulangan korosi
13
 Cleaning
 Design improvement
 Material selection
 Coating and lining
– organic coatings, metallic coatings,
ceramic coatings.
 Cathodic protection
 Anodic protection
 Inhibitors
 Surface modification
14 PRINSIP PENGENDALIAN KOROSI
• Cleaning
– Mengurangi waktu kontak logam dengan media
• Design Improvement
– Memperbaiki bentuk konstruksi untuk menghindarkan kondisi yang
memfasilitasi terjadinya reaksi korosi
• Material Selection
– Memakai material yang sesuai dan kurang sensitif terhadap
lingkungankerja
• Coating
– Mencegah kontak antara logam dan lingkungannya
15
• Cathodic Protection
• Membuat logam bertindak sebagai katoda
• Anodic Protection
• Membuat logam bertindak sebagai anoda yang daapat
menciptakan lapisan pasif
• Inhibitors
• Mengurangi keagresifan lingkungan
16
PERMASALAHAN DI INDUSTRI SEARA
UMUM MATERIAL, KEGAGALAN DAN
KOROSI
KEGAGALAN KOROSI
KESALAHAN MATERIAL
18 BENTUK-BENTUK KERUSAKAN
KARENA KOROSI
 Penipisan
 Pembentukan retakan/sumuran
 perubahan penampilan
 Penurunan daya dukung
 Penggetasan
19 NILAI KERUGIAN SECARA UMUM

ADALAH
1.5-2.5%
dari GDP !!
20 Kerugian karena Korosi di Negara Lain

Kerugian karena Korosi di Amerika
1975 1995
21
All industries
Total (billions of 1995 dollars) $82.5 $296.0
Avoidable $33.0 $104.0
Avoidable 40% 35%
Motor vehicles
Total $31.4 $94.0
Avoidable 73% 69%
Aircraft
Total $3.0 $13.0
Avoidable $0.6 $3.0
Avoidable 20% 23%
Other industries
Total $47.6 $189.0
Avoidable 19% 19%
22 SEKTOR-SEKTORYANG
TERPENGARUH OLEH KOROSI
• Sektor industri logam, mesin, maritim, elektronika

• Sektor industri pertambangan
• Sektor industri migas dan energi
• Sektor transportasi & komunikasi
• Sektor infrastruktur
• dll
THE ORIGINAL BATTELLE/NIST STUDY

23 IDENTIFIED TEN ELEMENTS OF THE COST OF
CORROSION:
• Replacement of equipment or buildings
• Loss of product
• Maintenance and repair
• Excess capacity
• Redundant equipment
• Corrosion control
• Technical support
• Design
• Insurance
• Parts and equipment inventory
24
25
GOALS
• “Corrosion management is that part of the overall
management system, which is concerned with the
development, implementation, review and
maintenance of the corrosion policy.”
CONCERNS OF
26
CORROSION HANDLING
•RELIABILITY
•PRODUKTIVITY
•SAFETY &
ENVIRONMENT
CORROSION AS A PART OF PIPELINE INTEGRITY

27
MANAGEMENT
28
INTEGRATED CORROSION
MANAGEMENT CHARTS
PENGENDALIAN OLEH TOP
MANAGEMENT
DIVISI PRODUKSI DIVISI ENGINEERING
USAHA
PENGENDALIAN
KOROSI
TERPADU DI
INDUSTRI DIVISI
DIVISI LOGISTIK MAINTENANCE DAN
INSPEKSI
 Tahu/ Permasalahan cukup serius
(BERBAHAYA, MERUGIKAN,
KONDITE DLL)
30
 Tertarik untuk mengetahui lebih
lanjut/interest
 Kesadaran/awareness
 Meningkatkan pengetahuan lebih

lanjut/knowledge
 Penerapan pengetahuan untuk

penanggulangan / action
managerial & teknis
 Peningkatan kemampuan untuk
menjadi ahli/ professional
recognition
 Melakukan aktivitas praktis

dilapangan
18/09/2011
GUIDANCE FOR CORROSION MANAGEMENT IN
31 OIL AND GAS PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION
SCOPE OF APPLICATION
• 1. Management system scope

• Corrosion management is defined as the part of the overall management system that develops,
implements, reviews and maintains the corrosion management policy and strategy. The
corrosion policy provides a structured framework for identification of risks associated
with corrosion, and the development and operation of suitable risk control
measures.
• 2. Production facilities scope
• The document is intended to apply to the following facilities:
• — offshore installations (including process plant, utilities and supporting structures);
• — pipelines and subsea gathering, manifolds and processing systems, and
• — onshore plant for reception, separation and stabilisation.

CONT’D
• 3. Deterioration processes scope

• Corrosion management covers the management of threats to technical integrity arising from
mechanisms of material deterioration and failure, including but not limited to:
• — corrosion processes – general, localised and galvanic;
• — environmental cracking – stress corrosion, hydrogen induced, sulphide stress cracking,
corrosion fatigue, etc.;
• — erosion, erosion corrosion, cavitation assisted corrosion and other flow related
degradation mechanisms, and
• — mechanical damage – vibration induced fatigue, brittle fracture.
INTEGRATED CORROSION MANAGEMENT
33 SYSTEM
ROHRBACK COSASCO SYSTEM
TOOLS: Corrosion circuit
34
SW.WANDA-A N.WANDA-B N.WANDA-A WANDA-A GITA-A RETNO
CINTA-A
9,728 ft, Ø12” (1984)
)
ak ) ak
1 le 1 le Mar’95 (J-Bow; 1 leak)
Pin = 273 psi Fluid Comp. : A; A;
GIT GIT
Pou t= 254 psi S = 47 ppm ft fr 6 ft fr
CNOOC - 114 Tin = 123 oF Cl = 3010 ppm
(2296(229
CNOOC - 114
0
t’89 ’9
=
CO3 = 1533 ppm
Tout = 117 oF Oc Feb
CINTA-B CINTA-C V = 0.72 fps TAN = 0.576
BSW = 72.21 % pH = 7.36 Pin = 238 psi Fluid Comp. :
Leak Record = 8 Sand = low S = 102 ppm
Pou t= 170 psi
Pin = 120 psi Fluid Comp. : Tin = 192 oF Cl = 1152 ppm
 Date : August, 1st 1989. Location : N/A. Leak : =
S = 55 ppm 1" leak diameter on 1 joint. Treatment : N/A. Tout = 117 oF CO3 = 3042 ppm
Pou t= 43 psi
o
Cl = 3550 ppm  Date : Oct, 17th 1989. Location : 700 m from V = 1.57 fps TAN = 1.045
Tin = 112 F Gita A. Leak : 2" leak diameter on 1 joint.
o CO3= = 2604 ppm BSW = 81.76 % pH = 7.07
Tout = 163 F
TAN = 0.883
Treatment : N/A.
Leak Record = 3 Sand = low Pin = 120 psi Fluid Comp. :
V = 1.87 fps  Date : Feb, 18th 1990. Location : 700 m from
Pou t= 43 psi S = 55 ppm
Aug’ 03 (Close to CINP; 1 leak)

BSW = 88.12 % pH = 7.2 Gita A. Leak : 1" leak diameter on 1 joint.
 Date : 14 August 1991. Location : J-Bow 2
Aug’03 (Riser; 1 leak)

Leak Record = 9 Sand = Low Treatment : N/A.
 Date : April, 19th 1990. Location : N/A. Leak : 1" hole, Action: 1 smith clamp
o
Tin = 112 F Cl = 3550 ppm
Jul’02 (J-Bow; 7 leak)

RAMA-A
May’01 (1476 ft.; 1 leak)

Apr’03 (1246 ft.; 1 leak)
leak diameter on 1 joint. Treatment : N/A.  Date: 27 Jul 94, Location: J-Bow 1 hole, CO3= = 2604 ppm
Jun’01 (820 ft.; 1 leak)

o
8 “ Pipeline Tout = 163 F
Apr’03 (2362 ft.; 2 leak)

 Date : April, 25th 1990. Location : 150 m from Action: 1 smith clamp
 Date : 22 May 01. Location : 450 m from  Date: 03 Mar 95, Location: J-Bow at GITA 1 TAN = 0.883
Mar’04 (J-Bow; 1 leak)

Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock. Treatment : 1 ea
19 April leak. Leak : 1" leak diameter on 1 joint.
Treatment : N/A. hole, Action: Plidco clamp V = 1.87 fps
8" x 1 ft Plidco Clamp, 300 psi test.
 Date : April, 30th 1990. Location : 50 m from 19 (*) Note : J-Bow at Gita has been replaced at BSW = 88.12 % pH = 7.2
 15 June 01. Location : 250 m from Cinta P. June,20th 1995
Leak : at 6 o'clock (2-3 mm). Treatment : 1
April leak. Leak : 1" leak diameter on 1 joint.
Leak Record = 9 Sand = Low
ea 8" x 1 ft Plidco Clamp CINTA-P Treatment : one smith clamp.
 Date : April, 28th 1994. Location : 2 m from 30
 Date : 24 April 03. Location : 720 m from April ‘90 leak. Leak : 1" leak diameter.
8 “ Pipeline
Apr’03 (2362 ft.; 2 leak)

Cinta P. Leak : at 6 & 9 o'clock, 2 holes.
Gas Line From CBU

Treatment : one smith clamp
Treatment : installed modified Clamp. Oct’03 (2526 ft.; 1 leak)  Date : Des, 06th 2001. Location : 1200 ft from  Date : 22 May 01. Location : 450 m from
 Date : 29 April 03. Location : 380 m from
Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one holes. CINTA-G CINTA-H Gita A. Leak : 1" leak at 6 o'clock. Treatment : DUMA-A Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock. Treatment : 1 ea
one Plidco clamp.
7,596 ft, Ø8” (1975)

Treatment : installed Smith Clamp.12 " OD
pipeline CINTA-P1 8" x 1 ft Plidco Clamp, 300 psi test.
 Date : 23 August 03. Location : close to Jul’03 (J-Bow; 1 leak)
 15 June 01. Location : 250 m from Cinta P.
7,577 ft, Ø12” (1975)

Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole. Leak : at 6 o'clock (2-3 mm). Treatment : 1
Treatment : installed modified Clamp.
 Date : 20 Sept 03. Location : 100 m from
RAMA-C RAMA-E ea 8" x 1 ft Plidco Clamp
Cinta D. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole.  Date : 24 April 03. Location : 720 m from
Treatment : 1 ea 16" x 2 ft Plidco Clamp Cinta P. Leak : at 6 & 9 o'clock, 2 holes.
 Date : 23 Oct 03. Location : 770 m from CINTA-E RAMA-G
Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole. Dec’02 (2132 ft. fr CINP1; 1 leak) Treatment : installed modified Clamp. O
Treatment : 1 ea 16" x 2 ft Plidco Clamp.  Date : 29 April 03. Location : 380 m from
12” Pipeline
 Date : 17 July 2002, Location : at Cinta P1 J Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one holes.
5,878 ft, Ø12” (1976)
7,596 ft, Ø8” (1975)

Treatment : installed Smith Clamp.12 " OD
)
bow, Leak: 7 Leakholes at 6 o’clock.
ak
5,871 ft, Ø8” (1976)

1 le
Treatment: Wrapped with Syntho Glass 8
pipeline
layers and press test 150 psi
{ RAMA-B
D;
 Date : 23 August 03. Location : close to
IN
 Location : 24 August 2003. Location : At
rC
Cinta P1 riser, 3 ft from concrete. Leak : at 6 Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole.
t. f
30,180 ft, Ø16” (1979)
o'clock. Treatment : Wrapped with Syntho 8f
CINTA-F RAMA-I RAMA-D Treatment : installed modified Clamp.
32
Glass 8 layers and press test 150 psi.
3(
 Date : 14 March 2004. Location : Cinta P J  Date : 20 Sept 03. Location : 100 m from
p’0
Se
Bow. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole close to J

bow. Treatment : 12" x 1 ft Plidco clamp
Cinta D. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole.
 Date: 18 Feb 2005. Location: 230m from Treatment : 1 ea 16" x 2 ft Plidco Clamp
June’05 (75 ft.; 1 leak)

CINP, 3 holes 6 O’clock.Treatment : 12" x 1  Date : 23 Oct 03. Location : 770 m from
ft Plidco clamp RAMA-P P = 160 psi Fluid Comp. : Cinta P. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole.
o
T = 117 F S=- Treatment : 1 ea 16" x 2 ft Plidco Clamp.
CINTA-D Pin = 115 psi Fluid Comp. :
25,809 ft, Ø16” (1976)
V = 5.35 fps Cl = -
12” Pipeline
=
Pou t= 52 psi S = 30 ppm Pin = 115 psi Fluid Comp. : BSW = - CO3 = -
 Date : 17 July 2002, Location : at Cinta P1 J
LITA-A Tin = 160 F
o
Cl = 4,035 ppm Pou t= 39 psi S = 42 ppm
Cl = 3275 ppm
Leak Record =
Date : June 2005.
TAN = -
pH = - bow, Leak: 7 Leakholes at 6 o’clock.
Tout = 156 F
o CO3= = 2653 ppm Tin = 160 F
o
=
CO3 = 292 ppm Location : 75ft from Sand = - Treatment: Wrapped with Syntho Glass 8
TAN = 0.659 Tout = 130 F
o
V = 1.51 fps
TAN = 0.88 RAMA-F RAMA-H Rama P. Leak : 1 leak
layers and press test 150 psi
26,994 ft, Ø12” (1981)

BSW = 97.06 % pH = 7.18 V = 3.568 fps
Leak Record = 3 Sand = Low BSW = 90.8 % pH = 7.25  Location : 24 August 2003. Location : At
Leak Record = 1 Sand = low
Cinta P1 riser, 3 ft from concrete. Leak : at 6
8” Pipeline
 Date : 23 Dec 2002. Location : 650 m from  Date : July, 31st 2000. Location : Jbow at o'clock. Treatment : Wrapped with Syntho
Cinta P1. Leak : at 12 o'clock. Treatment : 1 ea Cinta P1. Leak : 2 leaks at 12 o'clock and 5 Glass 8 layers and press test 150 psi.
KITTY-A 8" x 10" length Plidco Clamp installed leaks at 6 o'clock. Treatment : 1 ea 18"
Smith Clamp  Date : 14 March 2004. Location : Cinta P J
Bow. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole close to J
S
bow. Treatment : 12" x 1 ft Plidco clamp
 Date: 18 Feb 2005. Location: 230m from
E-RAMA CINP, 3 holes 6 O’clock.Treatment : 12" x 1
6,800 ft, Ø 6” (1999) ft Plidco clamp
CINTA-D
Pin = 356 psi Fluid Comp. :
Pou t= 210 psi S = 31 ppm
SELATAN-A
o
Tin = 203 F Cl = 2775 ppm LITA-A
CO3= = 3042 ppm
PABELOKAN ISLAND
o
Tout = 183 F
V = 7.50 fps TAN = 0.717
BSW = 94.86 % pH = 7.4
Leak Record = - Sand = low
SELATAN-B
SELATAN-C NORA-A Corrosion Mapping of Pipelines

at South Business Unit KITT
CNOOC
Pemetaan data korosi dan kondisi operasi pilelines di CNOOC SES, Ltd
SELATAN
 TOOLS: Corrosion mapping
Contoh : Corrosion Mapping Crude Distillation Unit
BENEFITS OF EFFECTIVE CORROSION

36 MANAGEMENT
(WHY MANAGE CORROSION?)
• — compliance with statutory and corporate safety, health and environmental
requirements;
• — reduction in safety and environmental hazard from leaks and structural failures;
• — increased plant availability, improving income;
• — reduction in unplanned maintenance, reducing costs;
• — reduction in deferment costs;
• — optimisation of mitigation, monitoring and inspection costs, and
• — improvement in the working environment with associated benefits.
37 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
The main current applicable UK legislation governing activities on topsides processing facilities for offshore
installations includes:
• • Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSW Act)
• • Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1992 (SI 1999/3242) (MHSWR)
• • Offshore Installations (Safety Case) Regulations (SI 1992/2885) (SCR)
• • Offshore Installations and Wells (Design and Construction, etc) Regulations 1996 (SI 1996/913) (DCR)
• • Offshore Installations (Prevention of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response) Regulations 1995 (SI
1995/743) (PFEER)
• • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/2306)
38
39
EQUIPMENTS AND UNITS NEEDS &
History card CORROSIONP

ROBLEMS
40 Design data
Operation
Maintenance history history
CORROSION MAPPING
RISK LEVEL Inspection strategy

Modification,
Improvement
?
SOP
Inspection,
Maintenance &
Mitigation
Maintenance strategy
CORROSION PREVENTION
PLAN GUIDANCE
GOALS!!
RELIABILITY,
CORROSION MANAGEMENT SAFETY &
MANAGEMENT CONCERN
(IMPLEMENTATION & POLICY) PRODUCTIVITY
41 BENEFITS OF EFFECTIVE CORROSION

MANAGEMENT
(WHY MANAGE CORROSION?)
• — compliance with statutory and corporate safety, health and
environmental requirements;
• — reduction in safety and environmental hazard from leaks and structural
failures;
• — increased plant availability, improving income;
• — reduction in unplanned maintenance, reducing costs;
• — reduction in deferment costs;
• — optimisation of mitigation, monitoring and inspection costs, and
• — improvement in the working environment with associated benefits.
42
43
44
Cost of corrosion in sector

categories analyzed in 1998 U.S.
study; total, $137.9 billion
Corrosion costs in infrastructure

18/09/2011
45 SUMMARY
• The infrastructure of the nation is essential to the quality of life, industrial
productivity, international competitiveness, and security
• Each component of the national infrastructure, such as highways, airports,
water supply, waste treatment, energy supply, and power generation,
represents a complex system and large investments.
• Corrosion is damage that results from the interaction of structures and
materials with their environment, corrosion can result in catastrophic
failures, with loss of life and disruption of essential services
• The principal challenges in realizing the significant savings that result from
improved corrosion control include an unfortunate lack of awareness of
corrosion costs by the public and policymakers and a widely held
misconception that nothing can be done about corrosion.
46 CONT’D
 This invisible infrastructure includes items such as water mains, gas and oil
pipelines, power plants, and telecommunications systems
 The preservation and the extension of the useful life of an existing infrastructure is
a great challenge because of the long service lives that are desired.The operating
life of critical components of the infrastructure is often extended well beyond the
original design service life.
 While the focus may recently have shifted from building a new infrastructure to
the preservation and extended use of the existing infrastructure, the necessary
changes in public attitudes, adjustments to the allocation of resources, changes to
the industrial, government, and academic institutions, and revisions to policies,
practices, and procedures.
47
CORROSION PREVENTION STRATEGIES
• Increase awareness of significant corrosion costs and potential cost savings

• Change the misconception that nothing can be done about corrosion
• Change policies, regulations, standards, and management practices to increase corrosion cost
savings through sound corrosion management
• Improve education and training of staff in the recognition of corrosion control
• Implement advanced design practices for better corrosion management
• Develop advanced life prediction and performance assessment methods
• Improve corrosion technology through research, development, and implementation
48 KALIMAT KUNCI
Korosi tidak pernah berhenti
Semakin canggih penggunaan peralatan, akan
semakin canggih pula masalahnya
Pembelajaran harus dilakukan secara
berkesinambungan
Usaha penanggulangan korosi bukan Waste,
tapi adalah INVESTASI
Kerjasama antar stake holder mutlak
diperlukan
49
MASYARAKAT ANTI KOROSI INDONESIA

Corrosion Management and Strategyfot Corrosion Handling

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Corrosion Management and Strategyfot Corrosion Handling

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

CORROSION

BY. BAMBANG WIDYANTO

• PENGETAHUAN KOROSI • PENGETAHUAN MATERIAL

3 HAL-HAL YANG HARUS DIKETAHUI UNTUK

4 PERMASALAHAN BILA ADA KEGAGALAN

• Korosi adalah degradasi (perusakan atau penurunan

(F) BEBAN (statik/dinamik)

Korosi seragam Korosi sumuran (pitting) Korosi celah

Korosi tegangan Korosi batas butir Korosi erosi Korosi mikrobial

14 PRINSIP PENGENDALIAN KOROSI

19 NILAI KERUGIAN SECARA UMUM

20 Kerugian karena Korosi di Negara Lain

• Sektor industri logam, mesin, maritim, elektronika

THE ORIGINAL BATTELLE/NIST STUDY

CORROSION AS A PART OF PIPELINE INTEGRITY

DIVISI PRODUKSI DIVISI ENGINEERING

 Meningkatkan pengetahuan lebih

 Penerapan pengetahuan untuk

 Melakukan aktivitas praktis

• 1. Management system scope

CORROSION MANAGEMENT by BW/AS

• 3. Deterioration processes scope

Aug’ 03 (Close to CINP; 1 leak)

Aug’03 (Riser; 1 leak)

Jul’02 (J-Bow; 7 leak)

May’01 (1476 ft.; 1 leak)

Jun’01 (820 ft.; 1 leak)

Apr’03 (2362 ft.; 2 leak)

Mar’04 (J-Bow; 1 leak)

Apr’03 (2362 ft.; 2 leak)

Gas Line From CBU

7,596 ft, Ø8” (1975)

7,577 ft, Ø12” (1975)

5,878 ft, Ø12” (1976)

7,596 ft, Ø8” (1975)

5,871 ft, Ø8” (1976)

Bow. Leak : at 6 o'clock, one hole close to J

June’05 (75 ft.; 1 leak)

26,994 ft, Ø12” (1981)

SELATAN-C NORA-A Corrosion Mapping of Pipelines

BENEFITS OF EFFECTIVE CORROSION

History card CORROSIONP

RISK LEVEL Inspection strategy

41 BENEFITS OF EFFECTIVE CORROSION

Cost of corrosion in sector

Corrosion costs in infrastructure

• Increase awareness of significant corrosion costs and potential cost savings

MASYARAKAT ANTI KOROSI INDONESIA

Anda mungkin juga menyukai