Sesi 2 - Teguh Dartanto, PH.D - 'Publikasi International Bidang Sosial'
Sesi 2 - Teguh Dartanto, PH.D - 'Publikasi International Bidang Sosial'
Teguh Dartanto1,2,3
teguh.dartanto@ui.ac.id
1Wakil Dekan Bidang Pendidikan, Penelitian dan Kemahasiswaan, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia
2Riset Klaster Kemiskinan, Perlindungan Sosial dan Ekonomi Pembangunan, FEB UI
12/18/20
Outline Presentasi
• Pengalaman Publikasi
• Bagaimana Memulai Menulis
• Langkah-Langkah Menulis Ilmiah
• Apa yang reviewer inginkan
12/18/20 2
Orang Boleh Pandai Setinggi Langit, tapi Selama Tidak
Menulis, Ia akan Hilang di dalam Masyarakat dan Sejarah.
Menulis adalah Bekerja untuk Keabadian
(Pramoedya Ananta Toer)
3
12/18/20 4
Pengalaman Publikasi Ilmiah
12/18/20 5
6
Termasuk
112 artikel
di UI yang
menerima
insentif dari
Kemenristek
/BRIN
2020
10
Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies (BIES) (Q1): Quantitative Paper
• Novelty of Article:
• Contribute to the literature of poverty and middle-class studies.
• Using 21 years of household panel data
• Written: 2012
• Presented: 2013
• Working paper: 2016
• Rejected many times
• First Submission BIES: July 2017
• First Comment: November 2017
• Revision process: 2 reviewers+1 editor, 4 round of review process, change 95% (writing a
new paper)
• Acceptance: May 2019
• Published Online: September 2019 (Published August 2020)
• Proofread: many times
• Rejected in the First Submission--Editor: In view of the criticisms of the referees, I must decline
the manuscript in its present form for publication in the Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies.
9
Pengalaman Menerbitkan Artikel di Jurnal Ilmiah
Awal-awal Publikasi Ilmiah:
• Selalu berusaha menulis sesuatu yang kelihatan besar, mewah, complicated,
susah (megalomania view).
• Beberapa kali ditolak oleh jurnal yang reputable (sering dapat balasan
tulisan anda tidak bermutu).
• Putus asa, sehingga asal terbit di Jurnal baik kelas menengah dan bawah,
atau bahkan jurnal yang berbayar (predatory).
Belajar Dari Pengalaman:
• Jangan Bangga, jika tulisan anda tidak pernah ditolak oleh Jurnal
• Belajar dari pengalaman dan komentar dari reviewer.
• Menulis sesuatu yang sederhana, strong and systematic introduction,
original research.
10
Desk Rejection
• Thank you for your recent submission to Public Choice of "Does Money Matter for
Electability? Lessons Learned from the 2014 Legislative Election in Indonesia." I
have now had an opportunity to read through your paper. While your paper
addresses an interesting topic, I do not believe it is a candidate for publication in
Public Choice.
• Rather than hold your manuscript hostage to a long review process, I have
decided that I should return it to you immediately in case you want to send it to
another journal.
Those results are consistent with the bulk of the literature on proportional
representation. What's new about your findings is that these effects occur in
Indonesia. Your submission is therefore not a good fit for our journal and may
better suited for one specializing in Indonesian politics or perhaps a comparative
politics journal.
12/18/20 11
Bagaimana Kita Memulai?
Semuanya dimulai dari Langkah kecil
12/18/20 12
Hierarchy of
Scientific
Evidence
12/18/20 13
High Chance to be Accepted Reputable Journal in Social Science Area
Berdasarkan Pengalaman
Fresh Idea
dan
Bermanfaat
High
Chance
Contribution
to Literature
Hot
in Indonesia Issue
14
Tips and Tricks of Writing Publishable Article
CLEAR SIMPLE
don’t be complicated:
Explain the idea using the simple graph or
systematically, strong the theoretical model to
introduction convince people
QUANTITATIVE:Presisi,
akurasi dan generalisasi
dibutuhkan untuk
menyampaikan bahwa hidup
tidak sekedar rasa tetapi juga
ada data dan aksi nyata
Source: Based on Reichardt and Cook (1979)
12/18/20 16
Quantitative Qualitative
12/18/20 17
Flow of Qualitative Research: A case of Dartanto et al. 2020
12/18/20 18
Langkah-Langkah Penulisan Ilmiah
12/18/20 19
Content of Academic Paper
• Research • Research
Objectives questions
• Motivation adequately
• Contributions answered
• Gaps
Introduction Methods
Literature
Results
Review
• State of • Discussion
Knowledge • Robustness
• Gaps • So What?
Source: Mansor, 2020
Purposes of the Introduction
Bem (2003) provides the following
guidelines:
Kotze (2007)
1. Statement of topic of
study
Topic 2. Academic/Practical
Importance
3. Summary of Literature
Issues 4. Gaps, Controversies,
Inconsistencies
5. Research Objectives
Attention and Context
6. Outline
Purposes
Elements Source: Mansor, 2020
Literature Review:
Placing the Literature in Context
12/18/20 23
What is Literature Review?
WHAT IT IS NOT WHAT IT IS
An overview of existing research
• A list of everything written on a topic closely related to a given topic and
• Description of a series of papers answers to related research questions
• A catalog or annotated
bibliography on the subject under
study
Organization
Evaluation
Lacks organization guided by research
questions
Identification of trends
Lacks Synthesis
What are the trends and themes in Where are the areas on which
the literature? Consensus, there is ample research? What are
controversy, on-going debate? the areas that need further
Where does my research weigh in? research?
Notable Points
31
Pengalaman Menjadi Reviewer
• World Development Perspectives • Singapore Economic Review
• Journal of Poverty • Annals of Operation Research
• International Journal of Public
Health • The Journal of Economic Structure
• Bulletin of Indonesian Economic • Review of Development
Studies Economics
• Energy Economics
• Applied Economics
• Health Policy and Planning
• European Journal of Political • Economics Bulletin
Economy • Economics and Finance in
• World Development Indonesia
• Food Policy • Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan
• the Asia-Pacific Development Indonesia.
Journal
12/18/20 32
Pengalaman Review Paper-paper orang Indonesia
(Asia)
• Introduction: not straightforward, too humble (tidak menunjukkan
keunggulan (novelty) riset (atau memang tidak tahu?)), penjelasan
yang tidak efisien.
• Literature review: sangat kurang dan tidak sistematis disampaikan
(kadang menunjukkan ringkasan dibandingkan diskusi).
• Framework yang lemah (not systematic thinking).
• Terlalu mengagungkan metodologi: ekonometrika, metode yang
rumit tapi kadang tidak tahu kenapa harus memakai metode tersebut.
• Analisa terlalu dangkal, kebanyakan menampilkan hasil model tanpa
memberikan alasan ekonomi (logik) dibalik hasil tersebut.
33
Apa yang Reviewer Inginkan?
(Ingat Reviewer punya Pekerjaan Utama, Review adalah kerjaan Volunter)
34
Apa yang Reviewer Inginkan? Lanjut...
• Clear Methodology: why this methodology is used, what is
the advantage and disadvantage compared to other methods;
not need to show technical methodology (if this is not
originally developed).
• Analysis of Results: don’t explain all
econometric/quantitative results (for example; F-stat, R-
square, coefficient), showing what is the rational behind of
findings .
• Conclusion : showing only the interesting and important
findings related to research question (don’t summarize).
35
What Should Be
Done:
- Change the mindset
NO - Be Passion
- Hardworking
for Publication - Trying, Trying,
at a Reputable Journal Trying
- Praying
- Yareba Dekiru
Terima Kasih
ご静聴ありがとうございます
36