Stela Metode Storie Index Soil Rating

METODE SISR
STORIE INDEX SOIL RATINGS
PENILAIAN INDEKS STORIE

TANAH
INDEKS STORIE
Sumber: STELA April 2013

SISR: STORIE INDEX SOIL
RATINGS
Indeks Storie merupakan metode
penilaian (rating) tanah berdasarkan
karakteristik tanah yang menentukan
potensi pemanfaatan tanah dan
kapasitas produktivitas tanah.
Metode ini tidak memperhitungkan
faktor fisikj lainnya atau faktor
ekonomi yg mungkin mempengaruhi
kesesuaian tanaman di suatu lokasi.
Analisisnya mudah dilakukan,

SISR: STORIE INDEX Soil Ratings
Ada empat atau lima parameter yg lazim
dievaluasi:
A: Kedalaman Tanah dan Tekstur;
B: Permeabilitas Tanah;
C: Sifat Kimia Tanah;
D: Drainage, Limpasan permukaan;
E: Iklim (only if it is not homogeneous, if so than
it should not be included in the formula);
Indeks dihitung dengan perkalian parameter ini,

yaitu:
Sindex = A x B x C x D x E
Kerugian /kelemahan metode ini adalah kalau kita
mempunyai nilai nol untuk suatu kategori, maka
SISTEM PENILAIAN INDEKS STORIE
Sistem ini me-Ranking karakteristik tanah
menurut kesesuaiannya untuk pertanian, dari
tanah-tanah Grade 1 (nilai 80 - 100), yg tidak
mempunyai pembatas untuk produksi pertanian
hingga Tanah-tanah Grade 6 ( nilainya kurang dari
10), yang tidak cocok untuk pertanian.
Under this system, soils deemed less than prime

can function as prime soils when limitations such
as poor drainage, slopes, or soil nutrient
deficiencies are partially or entirely removed.
The six grades, ranges in index rating, and

definition of the grades, as defined by the NRCS,
Sumber:
Indesk Storie merupakan metode semi-

kuantitatif penilaian tanah yg dapat
digunakan untuk pertanian irigasi
berdasarkan data produktivitas tanaman
yang dikumpulkan dari survei tanah (Storie
1932; Reganold and Singer 1979).
Indeks Storie menduga produktivitas tanah

berdasarkan empat karakteristik berikut:
1. Factor A: Derajat perkembangan profil tanah;
2. Factor B: Tekstur lapisan permukaan;
3. Factor C: Slope;
4. Factor X: Kondisi lain tanah dan lahan, termasuk
drainage, alkalinity,
Sumber: fertility, acidity, erosion,
http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf#page=7
Skor berkisar 0 - 100% ditentukan untuk setiap
faktor, dan skor-skor ini kemudian dikalikan satu-
sama lain untuk mendapatkan Nilai Indeks (Storie
1978).
One shortcoming of hand-generated Storie ratings
is that the scoring options for a particular factor or
subfactor have broad and somewhat arbitrary
ranges, which creates a great potential for
subjectivity among scientists (OGeen and
Southard 2005).
Our goal was to develop a model in NASIS to
rapidly generate Storie ratings without inherent
scoring discrepancies associated with hand-
generated ratings.
Sumber: http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf#page=7
REVISI SISR: STORIE INDEX Soil
Ratings
Storie Index Rating System
Grade Nilai Indeks Definisi
1 80 100 Tanah-tanah sangat sesuai untuk
Excellent penggunaan intensif tanaman irigasi yang
sesuai dnegan kondisi iklimnya.
2 Good 60 - 79 Tanah-tanah sesuai untuk pertanian,
although they may not be so desirable as
Grade 1 because of moderately coarse,
coarse, or gravelly surface soil texture;
somewhat less permeable subsoil; lower
plant available water holding capacity, fair
fertility; less well drained conditions, or
slight to moderate flood hazards, all
acting separately or in combination.
3 Fair 40 - 59 Tanah-tanah cukup sesuai untuk
penggunaan pertanian secara umum, and
are limited in their use because of
moderate slopes; moderate soils depths;
less permeable subsoil; fine, moderately
fine orSumber:
gravelly surface soil textures; poor
REVISI SISR: STORIE INDEX Soil
Ratings
Storie Index Rating System
Grade Index Definisi
Rating
4 20 - 39 Tanah-tanah kurang sesuai. They are severely
Poor limited in their agricultural potential because of
shallow soil depths; less permeable subsoil;
steeper slope; or more clayey or gravelly surface
soil texture than Grade 3 soils, as well as poor
drainage; greater flood hazards; hummocky
micro-relief; salinity; or poor fertility levels, all
acting alone or in combination.
5 10 - 19 Tanah-tanah secara aktual tidak sesuai untuk
Very pertanian, jarang diolah untuk pertanian,
Poor biasanya untuk range, pasture, atau hutan.
6 Kurang Soils are not suited for agriculture at all
Non- dari 10 due to very severe to extreme physical
agricul limitations, or because of urbanization.
-ture
Source: USDA Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Contra
Costa County, 1977. Sumber:
Semenjak 1980, negara bagian California telah
melakukan pemetaan lahan-lahan pertaniannya.
Program pemetaan lahan pertanian ini dilakukan

secara terus-menerus dengan tingkat pemetaan
yang semakin detail.
Kkriteria pemetaan lahan juga dimodifikasi terus

menjadi semakin detail.
Kriteria pemetaan lahan menggunakan sistem

Indeks Storie dan sistem SCS (konservasi tanah),
tetapi juga mempertimbangkan kondisi fisik seperti
suplai air untuk produksi tanaman, soil
temperature range, depth of the ground water
table, flooding potential, rock fragment content
Sumber:
Important Farmland Maps for California are
compiled using the modified LIM criteria (as
described above) and current land use information.
The minimum mapping unit is 10 acres unless
otherwise specified.
Unit-unit lahan yng kurang dari 10 acre

dimasukkan ke dalam klasifikasi unit-lahan di
sekitarnya. Peta lahan pertanian mengidentifikasi
tujuh kategori yg berhubungan dg pertanian:
Prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance
(statewide farmland), unique farmland, Lahan
pertanian lainnya yg penting secara lokal.
Each is summarized below, based on A Guide to

Sumber:
Arahan untuk pemetaan lahan pertanian yang
disusun oleh Departemen Konservasi USDA (1998).
Prime Prime farmland is land with the best combination of
Farmland physical and chemical features able to sustain the
: long-term production of agricultural crops. This land
has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture
supply needed to produce sustained high yields. The
land must have been used for the production of
irrigated crops at some time during the two update
cycles (a cycle is equivalent to 2 years) prior to the
mapping date of 1998 (or since 1994).
Statewid Farmland of Statewide Importance is land similar to
e prime farmland, but with minor shortcomings, such as
Farmland greater slopes or with less ability to hold and store
: moisture. The land must have been used for the
production or irrigated crops at sometime during the
two update cycles prior to the mapping date (or since
1994).
Unique Unique farmland is land of lesser quality soils used for
Farmland the production of the States leading agricultural
Sumber:
Local Farmland of local importance is land of

Farmlan importance to the local agricultural economy, as
d: determined by each countys Board of
Supervisors and a local advisory committee.
Contra Costa County local farmland includes
lands which do not qualify as Prime, Statewide,
or Unique designation, but are currently irrigated
crops or pasture or non-irrigated crops; lands
that would meet the Prime or Statewide
designation and have been improved for
irrigation, but are now idle; and lands that
currently support confined livestock, poultry
operations and aquaculture.
Grazing Grazing land is land on which the existing
Land: vegetation, whether grown naturally or through
management, is suited
Sumber: to the grazing of
Urban Urban and built-up land is occupied with
Land: structures with a building density of at least one
unit to onehalf acre. Uses may include but are
not limited to, residential, industrial, commercial,
construction, institutional, public administration
purposes, railroad yards, cemeteries, airports,
golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment
plants, water control structures, and other
development purposes. Highways, railroads, and
other transportation facilities are mapped as part
of this unit, if they are part of a surrounding
urban area.
Other Other land is land that is not included in any
Land: other mapping categories. The following uses are
generally included: rural development, brush
timber, government land, strip mines, borrow
pits, and a varietySumber:
of other rural land uses.
R. Earl Storie is Professor Emeritus, Soils and
Plant Nutrition and former Soil Technologist in
the Experiment Station, Berkeley.
INDEKS STORIE
Metode penilaian tanah ini, dikenal sebagai
Indeks Storie, berdasarkan atas
karakteristik tanah yg mengendalikan
pemanfaatan lahan dan kapasitas produktif
lahan.
It is independent of other physical or

economic factors that
Sumber: might determine
Metode Storie yang telah direvisi menetapkan
Faktor-C yang baru untuk mengevaluasi slope;
Faktor-C yang lama sekaranh dimasukkan ke dalam
Faktor-X.
Nilai-nilai persentase diberikan pada karakteristik
tanah, termasuk Profil Tanah (faktor A);
Tekstur tanah permukaan (faktor B);
Slope (faktor C);
Dan kondisi-kondisi yg eksklusif profil tanah,
tekstur permukaan, dan slope misalnya
drainage, kandungan alkali, kandungan hara,
erosion, dan micro relief (factor X).
Kondisi yang dianggap paling ideal (paling sesuai)
untuk setiap faktor diberi nilai 100%.
Nilai-nilai persentase dari empat faktor itu

Sumber:
Karakteristik profil tanah (faktor A) pada

hakekatnya merupakan ciri-ciri lapisan bawah
permukaan.
Tanah di lokasi survei (mis. Di California)
dikelompokkan menjadi beberapa kelompok
profil (mis. ada 9 kelompok profil tanah).
For example, soils that are deep and readily

pervious to roots and water (listed in
profile group I in the soil-rating chart) are
rated at 100 percent.
Profil tanah dengan subsoil liat-padat
(Kelompok Profil IV) diberi nilai lebih rendah.
Primary or residualSumber:
soils (listed in profile
Tanah-tanah dinilai berdasarkan tekstur
tanah lapisan permukaan (Faktor B).
Medium- textured soils, such as the loams and
the silt loams, are rated highest;
the extremes in texture, such as sands and
clays, lower.
Penilaian kemiringan lahan dimasukkan dalam

Faktor C.
Nearly level or gently sloping land is rated at

100 per cent.
As the slope increases, the rating for this factor
decreases.
As shown in the soil-rating chart, single letters
are used to indicate simple
Sumber:
slopes , and double
Kondisi eksklusif profil, tekstur tanah, dan

slope dimasukkan dalam Faktor X pada
peta penilaian tanah.
These conditions consist of drainage,

alkali or salt content, general nutrient
level, acidity, erosion, and microrelief
(surface regularity).
If two or more conditions exist that are

listed under factor X, the ratings for
each are treated independently; that is,
they are multiplied in order to secure
Sumber:
SOIL - RATING CHART
(Storie Soil Index rating =
factor A x factor B x
factor C x factor X)
Sumber:
Faktor A: Kelompok Profil Tanah

Faktor A adalah nilai karakteristik profil tanah
berdasarkan derajat perkembangan tanah.
Tanah-tanah dikelompokkan ke dalam Kelompok
Profil berdasarkan tipe landform dan
perkembangan horison genetiknya.
Soil development is defined as the presence of

Bt horizons or cemented layers.
Bt horizons are subsurface layers that have an
increase in clay relative to the overlaying
horizons.
The increase ishttp://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
Sumber: a result of the translocation of
Faktor A: Kelompok Profil Tanah

Untuk tanah-tanah alluvial, skor-nya semakin
menurun dengan semakin meningkatnya derajat
perkembangan tanah, seperti yang ditunjukkan
oelh adanya horison Bt dan/atau adanya lapisan
penghambat pertumbuhan akar.
Misalnya, tanah-tanah aluvial yang solumnya
dalam dan homogen diberi nilai 100%, sedangkan
tanah-tanah yang mempunyai horison Bt pada
landsekap-tua diberi nilai lebih rendah.
Soils with abrupt textural changes (claypan),

duripan, or petrocalcic horizons (hardpans) are
rated lower still.
For soils derived from bedrock, scoring is based on
Sumber: http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
Faktor B: Tekstur Tanah Lapisan

Permukaan
Faktor B berdasarkan tekstur tanah lapisan
atas.
Tanah-tanah berlempung mempunyai nilai
paling tinggi, dan tanah-tanah liat tan
tanah berpasir dinilai lebih rendah.
Rock fragment content is used to modify

the scores, which range from 100 to 10%.
The ratingSumber:
for http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
Factor B can vary as much as
Faktor C: Slope
Faktor C berdasarkan pada kecuraman
lereng. Lahan yang hampir datar hingga
sedikit miring (0 - 8% slope) diberi nilai
tinggi, berkisar 100 - 85%.
Moderate to strongly sloping conditions (9
to 30% slopes) have scores ranging from 95
to 70%; slopes greater than 30% receive
lower scores, ranging from 50 to 5% (Storie
1978).
Users choose a score in a somewhat
Faktor X: Drainage, Alkalinity,
Fertility,
Kemasaman, Erosi, dan Microrelief
Faktor X fokus pada sifat-sifat dinamis,
kondisi tanah dan landskap yg memerlukan
pengelolaan secara khusus.
Characteristics considered are drainage

class, alkalinity, nutrient status, degree of
acidity, wind and water erosion, and
microrelief. Scoring for each characteristic
in Factor X is subjective.
Rivised SISR: STORIE INDEX Soil
Ratings
PERKEMBANGAN MODEL
In our NASIS-based Storie Index, interpretation

criteria were modeled based on soil properties
traditionally incorporated into the hand-generated
Storie Index (1978).
The most closely related NASIS data elements that
pertained to the Storie 1978 criteria were used.
Our model uses discrete and fuzzy logic functions
to obtain more precise scores for the factors
associated with the index.
Banyak kriteria baru dimasukkan ke dalam Model,
dan faktor lainnya dimodifikasi untuk
menyesuaikan indeks dengan basis-data yang
tersedia.
Ratings
A system of interpretation generation using
fuzzy logic was included within the
database structure during NASIS
development in order to develop more
realistic soil interpretations.
Our model uses fuzzy rule sets to more

accurately score Factors C and X. Discrete
numerical scores in combination with fuzzy
logic functions were used for Factors A and
B.
Gelisols, Histosols, Spodosols, Oxisols, Dan

Ratings Profil Tanah
Faktor A: Kelompok
Banyaknya kelompok profil tanah untuk Faktor A
diubah dari sembilan kelompok dalam Storie 1978
menjadi empat kelompok.
Kelompok profil dalam Storie 1978
mengklasifikasikan tanah berdasarkan derajat
perkembanagannya dan sifat bahan induknya.
Dalam Model revisi ini ada penggabungan
kelompokn profil tanah yang kisaran skor-nya
hampir sama.
Interpretive criteria implied in Storie Profile Group
Factor A relied on the current taxonomic
placement (USDA NRCS 1999) of the soil in NASIS.
Thus, in some instances, out-of-date classifications
needed to be considered (table 1).
Ratings
Tahap pertama dalam pemodelan
adalah memilahkan tanah-tanah
yang berkembang dari batuan
induk (Groups VI - IX) dari tanah-
tanah yg berkembang dari bahan
aluvial (Group I - V).
Landform type, a data field stored

in NASIS, was used for this initial
classification.
Groups I to III of StorieRatings
1978 were combined because they
have a similar scoring range and reflect subtle differences in
soil development. These soils, which are found on alluvial
deposits, are scored based on the depth to root-restricting
layers such as shallow phases, consolidated material, gravel
lenses, and stratified layers with texture contrasts.
The scoring differences are identical in Groups I and II of
Storie 1978 and are only slightly lower in Group III. For
these reasons they were combined in our model. The soils of
Groups I to III were identified through their classification.
Pada umumnya semua tanah-tanah Entisols, Inceptisols,

Vertisols, Aridisols, Alfisols, Mollisols, dan Ultisols yang tidak
menunjukkan peningkatan kandungan liat secara drastis
dengan kedalaman atautidak mempunyai lapisan keras,
dimasukkan dalam Model.
A more is better fuzzy rating was applied to these profiles
in reference to depth to a restrictive layer. The curve reflects
an optimal effective rooting depth where soil thicknesses
that exceed 100 centimeters received a maximum score of
Index Storie yang diaplikasikan dalam Model NASIS
Mulai Groups I-III Groups IV Groups V
Soil Orders: Soil with Soil with
Fans, Entisols,
terraces, abrupt clay cemented
and flood
Vertisols, increase: layers:
Factor A plains Aridisols, Pale Petrocalcic
Soil profile group Alfisols, Mollisols, Duripan
(see figure 2 and Ultisols,
Landfor Inceptisols
table 1) Scores determined by effective soil depth using fuzzy
m rule
Groups VII-IX Soil orders not rated:
Soil depth: Histosols, Gelisols,
Uplands Fuzzy rule - Spodosols,
X
more is better Oxisols, and Andisols
Crisp limits for Fuzzy rule - less is

Factor B
surface better
Surface texture for surface coarse
textural class
fragments
scores (see figure 3)
(see table 2)
X
Index Storie yang diaplikasikan dalam Model NASIS
X
Fuzzy rule - less is
Factor C better
Slope Slope 0-100%
(see figure 4)
X
Factor X
Dynamic
Hydrology and
Physical X Chemistry
and fertility
properties properties
Growing Flooding - Erosion Drainag EC - SAR - pH -

season fuzzy rule - e- fuzzy rule fuzzy fuzzy
wetness - less is crisp crisp less is rule rule
less better limits limits less is optimu
is better (see figure (see (see
better better m
(see figure 7 table 4) table 3) (see figure (see (see
6) and table 5b) figure figure
5) 5b) 5a)
Ratings
Konsep awal tentang Profil Kelompok IV dalam
Storie 1978 tetap digunakan dalam Model ini.
Soils in this group are found on older plains and terraces and
have dense, clay-rich subsoils that restrict the movement of
water and roots. Soils in this group were identified in NASIS
based on Soil Taxonomy (USDA NRCS 1999).
All soils with the formative element pale at the great
group level were included. In addition, Albaqualfs and
Albaquults were included. The upper limit of the scoring
range for Profile Group IV in Storie 1978 was initially
assigned, then modified by effective soil depth.
Misalnya, tanah Palexeralf (tanah dengan lapisan cadas liat)

dengan kedalaman cadas liat kurang dari 1 foot semestinya
akan mendapat nilai 85. Skor ini kemudian direvisi
berdasarkan kedalaman yang tepat hingga horison
(lapisan) penghambat akar.
Hal ini menghasilkan skor Faktor A yang lebih rendah untuk
Ratings
Konsep original Kelompoik Profil V tetap
dipertahankan dalam Model ini. Tanah-tanah
dalam kelompok ini ditemukan pada kipas dan
terras tua , dan mempunyai subsoil yang padat dan
keras, sehingga membatasi pergerakan air dan
pertumbuhan akar.
Semua tanah dengan anasir formatif Duri, Petro,

Fragi, Petra, dan Plinth yang muncul pada tingkat
great-group juga dimasukkan dalam model. Semua
tanah Durids yg diklasifikasikan pada tingkat
suborder dan tanah-tanah Duric atau Petrogypsic
pada tingkat subgroup juga dimasukkan dalam
Model.
The upper limit of the scoring range for Profile
Group V in Storie 1978 was initially assigned.
A fuzzy logicSumber:
rulehttp://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
more is better, in reference to
Ratings
Formative elements of restrictive horizons
are not used at the great group level in Soil
Taxonomy (1999) where the upper boundary
of the layer is greater than 1 meter below
the surface. In such cases, the depth to
these layers is populated in NASIS as a
component restriction in the database.
A flag was placed in the model so that

when the component restriction attribute is
populated the soil is placed in its
appropriate profile group and scored
accordingly.
Ratings
Group VI dalam sistem Storie 1978
dihilangkan karena kesamaannya dengan
Group IV.
Group VII hingga IX dalam Storie 1978

digabungkan karena mereka mempunyai
kesamaan kisaran skor berdasarkan
kedalaman perakaran. Kelompok ini
mencerminkan tanah-tanah dengan bahan
induk residuum dan colluvium.
The fuzzy logic rule more is better, in

reference to http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
Sumber: depth to lithic or paralithic
Ratings
Faktor B: Tekstur lapisan permukaan
Nilai-nilai Crisp ditetapkan untuk kelas
tekstur tanah lapisan permukaan sesuai
dengan Storie 1978 (Table 2).
The following textures were not listed in

Storie 1978: very fine sandy loam, sandy
clay, loamy coarse sand, loamy fine sand,
loamy very fine sand, and silt.
These missing textural classes were

assigned ratings in our model (Table 2). At
Ratings
Faktor B: Tekstur lapisan permukaan
Semua skor kelas tekstur tanah dimodifikasi
berdasarkan kandungannya fragmen batuan
dengan menerapkan aturan logika- fuzzy less is
better.
The slope of line segments differed based on three
coarse fragment volume classes: less than 15%, 15
to 35%, and greater than or equal to 35%.
The fuzzy score for rock fragment content was
then used to weight the surface soil textural class
score for Factor B.
For example, a silt loam with 5% rock fragments
received a score of 100%, while a very gravelly silt
loam with 40% rock fragments received a score of
Ratings
Faktor C: Slope
The scoring threshold values for slope classes
established in Storie 1978 were used to append the
fuzzy logic rule less is better to produce a
unique score for any representative value of slope
stored in
NASIS.
Fungsi ini mengurangi subyektivitas yg

berhubungan dengan pemilihan suatu skor dari
kisaran skor-skor di dalam setiap faktor.
Misalnya dalam Storie 1978 :

Ratings
Faktor X: Sifat-sifat yang Dinamik
Data elements stored in NASIS that pertain to Factor X
(renamed Dynamic Properties in our model) were
combined into two groups: chemical and fertility properties
(Xcf); and hydrologic and physical conditions (Xhp).
Soil chemical and fertility limitations were established for
pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and sodium adsorption ratio
(SAR).
Hydrologic and physical conditions were assessed using
drainage class, flooding frequency, flooding duration during
the growing season, saturated conditions during the growing
season, and erosion class. The Factor X score was calculated
as the product of the lowest score in each subfactor group
(Xcf and Xhp).
Dalam Model ini, hanya digunakan dua sifat dinamis yang
paling membatasi untuk perhitungan Faktor X.
Xcf x Xhp = Faktor X

Ratings
Kondisi kimiawi pada Faktor X yang telah direvisi
agak berbeda dengan faktor X dalam Storie 1978.
In order to obtain more quantitative indices for

chemical conditions in soil, thresholds in toxicity
or osmotic effects were established for electrical
conductivity (EC) and pH to reflect conditions
that adversely affect plant growth, as well as for
sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) to reflect
conditions that affect soil dispersion and water
movement.
Tanah-tanah mendapatkan nilai 100% hingga

tercapai tingkat sub-optimal.
Ratings
Fuzzy rule sets were implemented in NASIS to
model the magnitude of the impairment.
For example, an optimal curve was used to score
pH through a trapezoidal pH optimal curve
reflecting extremes in alkalinity and acidity.
Scores of 100% were given to pH values ranging
from 5.5 to 8.5.
A less is better curve was used to score SAR and
EC.
Scores begin to decrease with SAR values that
exceed 7.
Soil Taxonomy (1999) uses SAR greater than or
equal to 13 to indicate Na-affected soils, but other
research has shown that soil water movement can
be affected by Na dispersion at SAR as low as 5
Ratings
Crisp scores were assigned to certain soil physical
properties because many are interpretations
reported as classes rather than measured
continuous variables. Scores for drainage class
and erosion class were derived using crisp values
(Tables 3 and 4).
Scores for a particular erosion class were higher

for uplands because slope is a component of the
erosion class. Also, because slope was already
considered in Factor C, these scores were adjusted
to avoid penalizing the site twice for the same
condition.
Uplands versus
Sumber:lowlands were identified in NASIS
http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
Ratings
Tanah jenuh air, frekuensi banjir, dan durasi banjir
berpengaruh buruk terhadap pertumbuhan tanaman kalau
terjadi selama musim pertumbuhan tanaman.
Lamanya musim pertumbuhan ditentukan berdasarkan regim
suhu tanah. Tanah-tanah dnegan resim suhu cryic, pergelic,
atau isofrigid mempunyai musim pertumbuhan lebih pendek,
July dan August.
Soils with frigid or mesic temperature regimes were given a
growing a season from May to September, while thermic
temperature regimes were given a growing season from
March to October.
Isomesic and hyperthermic regimes were given growing
seasons that extended 11 months of the year, from February
through December.
Isothermic and isohyperthermic temperature regimes had
year-round growing seasons.
The minimum depth to saturated conditions encountered

during the growing season was derived from the fuzzy logic
RIVISED SISR: STORIE INDEX SOIL
RATINGS
Interpretasi survei tanah ttg kelas frekuensi banjir
dan kelas durasi banjir digunakan untuk
mendeskripsikan dampak kejadian banjir yg terjadi
selama musim pertumbuhan tanaman.
Flooding frequency is an estimate of the number

of flood events that occur in a month. Flooding
duration is the length of time flood waters reside
on a particular site. Scores were established for
flooding duration and frequency classes that are
reported in NASIS.
The scores for a particular flooding duration class

and flooding frequency class were then multiplied
to get a flooding frequency and duration factor for
Ratings
Keuntungan Pendekatan Pemodelan
Indeks Storie
Indeks Storie yang direvisi mencerminkan
penyempurnaan dari sistem klasifikasi 1978.
Indeks yang dihitung dengan Model NASIS ini

snagat cepat, tidak bias, dan akurat untuk menilai
potensi produktivitas lahan di daerah survei. It is
capable of generating hundreds of Storie ratings in
seconds for SSURGO II datasets.
The NASIS model is a data-driven tool that reduces

the subjectivity of the hand-generated Storie
Index and improves the reliability of these ratings,
Ratings
Keuntungan Pendekatan Pemodelan
Indeks Storie
Model ini berbeda dengan Storie 1978 karena
beberapa sifat tanah dan landskap disimpan dalam
basis-data NASIS. Perubahan juga dilakukan untuk
meningkatkan objektivitas skoring.
For Factor A, profile groups were condensed from

nine in Storie 1978 to four because the range in
scores was similar in some groups (Profile Groups I
to III and VII to IX).
We also eliminated Profile Group VI in Storie 1978

Rivised SISR: STORIE INDEX SOIL
RATINGSModeling Indeks
Keuntungan Pendekatan
Storie
Modifikasi dilakukan pada Faktor X, yang disebut
Faktor Dinamik. Dalam Model Storie 1978
digunakan kondisi-alkali, tetapi dalamk Model ini
digunakan nilai-nilai EC dan SAR untuk
mencerminkan kondisi-kondisi saline, sodik, dan
saline- sodik.
An assessment of nutrient status was not
attempted in our model because fertility can be a
very dynamic property in agricultural settings,
depending on fertilization practices and other
variables.
Flooding frequency and duration of saturation
during the growing season were added to Factor X
Ratings
Kurva rating linear untuk interaksi
banjir, dihitung fengan menggunakan
skor frekuensi banjir dan skor
lamanya (durasi) banjir, sbb:
Flooding interaction =
(frequency class/100) x
(duration class/100).
Table 5. SubfactorRatings
scores for Factor X, flooding
frequency* and duration during the growing
season.
Note: Flooding frequency and duration classes are
defined in the National Soil Survey Handbook
(USDA NRCS 2007).
Kelas Frekuensi Banjir Skor Kelas Durasi Banjir
Skor
None 100 None 100

very rare 100 extremely brief 100
Rare 90 very brief 100
Occasional 85 brief 95
Frequent 70 long 85
very frequent 60 very long 75
Ratings
Figure 6.
Optimal: more is better fuzzy rating
curve for Factor X, depth to
saturation during the growing season.
Ratings
Table 4.
Skor Subfaktor untuk Faktor X, Kelas Erosi.
(Erosion ratings were different for uplands
versus lowlands because slope is a
dominant variable impacting erosion class
ratings in uplands.)
Kelas Erosi Skore Lowland Skore
Upland
0 100 100
1 80 95
2 60 85
3 40 75
4 20 65
Ratingsuntuk Faktor X,
Tabel 3. Skor Subfaktor
Kelas Drainage
Kelas Drainage Skor
Excessively drained and

Somewhat excessively drained 85
Well drained 100
Moderately well drained 90
Somewhat poorly drained 70
Poorly drained and very poorly drained
50
Ratings
Table 1. Faktor A, penyebutan kelompok profil tanah melalui data
taxonomi yg disimpan dalam NASIS (Note: Landform type, a field
stored in NASIS, was first used to separate alluvial soils (Groups I to
V) from upland soils (Groups VI to IX). Soil Taxonomy (USDA NRCS
1999) was used to place the soil in one of four new groups.
Histosols (peat soils), Gelisols (soils with permafrost), Oxisols
(highly weathered tropical soils), Andisols (volcanic soils), and
Stori Revise Taxonomic
Spodosols (cool units queried
humid Concept
forest soils) were not notes and
rated.
e d query rules
1978 profile
profil group
e
grou
p
I 1 Suborders: Soils of recent
Fluvents, Aquents, Psamments, alluvial deposits.
Orthents, Xererts, Torrerts, Usterts, Query rules:
Uderts Must not have
restrictive
Great groups: horizons and
Haplaquolls, Aquisalids, Calciaquerts, cannot
Dystraquerts, Epiaquerts be on hillslopes or
Endoaquerts, Natraquerts, Salaquerts mountains.
Table 1. Faktor A,Ratings
penyebutan kelompok profil
tanah melalui data taxonomi yg disimpan dalam
NASIS
Stori Revise Taxonomic units queried Concept notes and
e d query rules
1978 profile
profil group
e
grou
p
II 1 Suborders: Arents, Cambids Young soils on
alluvial
Great groups: deposits.
Haploxerolls, Haplustolls, Hapludolls, Query rules:
Vermustolls, Calciustolls, Cannot be on
Haprendolls, Calciudolls, Vermudolls, hillslopes or
Calciaquolls, Calcigypsids, mountains.
Haplogypsids, Haplocalcids, Outdated taxa
Sulfaquepts, Vermaquepts, included if
Endoaquepts, Epiaquepts, updates were not
Humaquepts, Sulfudepts, Eutrudepts, performed in
Dystrudepts, Calciustepts, NASIS. Presence
Dystrustepts, Haplustepts, of abrupt textural
Calcixerepts, Haploxerepts change included
Ratings
Table 1. Faktor A, penyebutan kelompok profil tanah melalui
data taxonomi yg disimpan dalam NASIS
Stori Revis Taxonomic units queried Concept notes
e ed and
1978 profil query rules
profil e
e group
group
III 1 Great groups: Moderately well-
Argigypsids, Natrigypsids, Natrargids, developed soils
Gypsiargids, Calciargids, Haplargids, formed in older
Vermaqualfs, Epiaqualfs, Endoaqualfs, alluvial deposits.
Glossaqualfs, Kandiaqualfs, Natraqualfs, Query rules:
Hapudalfs, Kandiudalfs, Kanhapludalfs, Cannot be on
Natrudalfs, Haplustalfs, Rhodustalfs, hillslopes or
Natrustalfs,Natrixeralfs, Rhodoxeralfs, mountains.
Haploxeralfs, Argialbolls, Natralbolls, Natraquolls, Presence of
Argiaquolls, Natrudolls, Argiudolls, Natrustolls, abrupt textural
Argiustolls, Natrixerolls, Argixerolls, Kandiaquults, change included
Kanhaplaquults, Umbraquults, Endoaquults, for stratified soils
Epiaquults, Kandihumults, Kanhaplohumults, and gravelly
Haplohumults, Kandiudults, Kanhapludults, subsoils.
Hapludults, Rhodudults, Kandiustults,
Kanhapustults, Rhodustults, Haplustults,
Ratings
Table 1. Faktor A, penyebutan kelompok profil tanah melalui data
taxonomi yg disimpan dalam NASIS
Stori Revis Taxonomic units queried Concept notes

e ed and
1978 profil query rules
profi e
le group
grou
p
IV 2 Great groups: Strongly
developed
All pale great groups of soils formed
Aridisols, Mollisols and in old alluvial
Alfisols, and deposits.
Albaqualfs and Albaquults Query rules:
that also have abrupt clay Cannot be on
increase with depth hillslopes or
mountains.
Tabel 1. Faktor A,Ratings
Stori Revis Taxonomic unitsNASIS
queried Concept notes and
e ed query rules
1978 profil
profi e
le group
grou
p
V 3 Suborder: Soils with hardpans
Durids formed in old
alluvial deposits.
Great groups:
Petro, Dur, Fragi, Petra, Plinth Query rules:
Cannot be on
Subgroups: hillslopes or
Duric Haplosalids, Petrogypsic mountains. Fuzzy
Haplosalids rule depth to
restrictive horizon
Other: used to generate
Calciudolls that have a score.
Stori Revis NASIS
Taxonomic units queried Concept notes and
e ed query rules
1978 profil
profi e
le group
grou
p
VI 2 Not included Group VI was dropped
because
of its similarity to
Group IV.
VII- 4 All colluvial and residual Groups VII to IX were

IX soils formed on mountains combined
and hillslopes based on soil depth in
Storie
1978 to bedrock or
consolidated
NASIS
Storie Revise Taxonomic units queried Concept notes
1978 d and
profile profile query rules
group group
I 1
Ratings
Figure 2. Fuzzy logic rating functions more is
better to define the effective soil depth in Factor
A, soil profile group.
A: A rating curve for Profile Groups IIII.

B: A rating curve for Profile Group IV describing
the depth to an abrupt texture change.
C: A rating curve for Profile Group V depth to a
cemented pan.
D: A rating curve for Profile Groups VIIIX
describing the depth to bedrock
Ratings
Tabel 2. Skore penilaian Crisp untuk Faktor B,
Kelas tekstur horison permukaan
Kelas Tekstur Lap. Permukaan
Nilai
very fine sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, silt, silt loam
100
loamy very fine sand, sandy loam, sandy clay loam,
calcareous silty clay loam, clay loam 95
coarse sandy loam, loamy fine sand, noncalcareous silty clay loam,
clay loam 90
loamy sand, very fine sand 80

fine sand, loamy coarse sand, sandy clay 65
Pasir, Liat Berdebu 60
Liat = Clay 50
Ratings
Figure 3.
Less is better fuzzy rating curve for
Factor B, surface rock fragment
content.
Straight line segments represent

three classes of rock fragment volume
percent populated in NASIS: 0-15, 15-
35 and > 35.
Ratings
Figure 4.
Less is better fuzzy rating curve for
Factor C, slope.
Most soil scientists express slope

gradient as a percent, the difference
in elevation between two points as a
percentage of the distance between
those points.
Slope 100% setara dengan sudut

Ratings
Figure 5A.
Optimal fuzzy rating curve for
Factor X, pH, in the surface layer.
Nilai pH optimal antara pH 5.5 dan

8.5.
Kondisi ekstrim terjadi pada nilai
pH rendah.
Ratings
Figure 5b.
Optimal: less is better fuzzy rating

curve for Factor X, surface soil
sodium adsorption ratio.
Skore menjadi lebih rendah kalau nilai

SAR lebih dari 7.
Ratings
Figure 5C.
Optimal: less is better fuzzy rating
curve for Factor X, surface soil
electrical conductivity (EC).
Skor menjadi lebih rendah kalau nilai

EC melebihi 1.0
FAKTOR A. Penilaian Karakter Fisik
Profil
I. Tanah-tanah pda kipas-aluvial muda,
dataran banjir, atau deposir sekunder
lainnya yg belum berkembang
Profiles .100 %
X - shallow phases (on consolidated material). 2 feet deep 50 -
60 %
X - shallow phases (on consolidated material). 3 feet deep 70 %
G - extremely gravelly subsoils 80 - 95 %
S - stratified clay subsoils . 80 - 95 %
II. Tanah-tanah pada Kipas-aluvial muda ,
dataran banjir.
or other secondary deposits having slightly developed
profiles 95 - 100 %
X - shallow phases (on consolidated material). 2 feet deep
.. 50 - 60
X - shallow phases (on consolidated material). 3 feet deep
.. 70 Sumber:
III. Tanah-tanah pd kipas aluvial tua, dataran
aluvial atau terras tua, perkembangan profilnya
moderat (subsoil agak rapat) .. 80 - 95 %
X - shallow phases (on consolidated material). 2 feet deep .. 40
- 60
X - shallow phases (on consolidated material). 3 feet deep .. 60
- 70
G
IV.- extremely gravelly pd
Tanah-tanah subsoils .. 60atau
dataran - 90 terras tua,
profilnya sudah berkembang (subsoil liat padat)
.. 40 - 80 %
V. Tanah-tanah pada Dataran atau Terras tua yg

mempunyai subsoil cadas-keras:
1. pada kedalaman kurang 1 foot 5 - 20
2. at 1 to 2 feet .. 20 - 30
3. at 2 to 3 feet .. 30 - 40
4. at 3 to 4 feet .. 40 - 50
5. At 4 to 6 feet .. 50 - 80
VI. Tanah-tanah pada terras tua dan lahan
kering dengan subsoil liat padat , bahan
induknya material padu atau agak padu
. 40 - 80
VII. Tanah-tanah di lahan kering yang

lapisan bawahnya keras pada kedalaman:
1. at less than 1 foot .. 10 - 30
2. at 1 to 2 feet .. 30 - 50
3. at 2 to 3 feet .. 50 - 70
4. at 3 to 4 feet .. 70 - 80
5. At 4 to 6 feet .. 80 - 100
6. at more than 6 feet 100
Sumber:
VIII. Tanah-tanah di lahan kering yang
lapisan bawahnya batuan sedimen
1. at less than 1 foot .. 10 - 30
2. at 1 to 2 feet .. 30 - 50
3. at 2 to 3 feet .. 50 - 70
4. at 3 to 4 feet .. 70 - 80
5. at 4 to 6 feet .. 80 - 100
6. at more than 6 feet .. 100
IX. Tanah-tanah di lahan kering yg lapisan

bawahnya material lunak
1. at less than 1 foot .. 20-40
2. at 1 to 2 feet .. 40 - 60
3. at 2 to 3 feet .. 60 - 80
4. at 3 to 4 feet .. 80 - 90
5. at 4 to 6 feet .. 90 - 100
6. at more than 6 feet .. 100
FAKTOR B --- Penilaian atas dasar tekstur lapisan
permukaan
Tekstur Medium :
1. fine sandy loam .. 100
2. loam .. 100
3. silt loam .. 100
4. Sandy loam 95
5. silty clay loam, calcareous .. 95
6. Silty clay loam. noncalcareous .. 90
7. clay loam. calcareous .. 95
8. clay loam. noncalcareous .. 85 - 90
Tekstur Berat atau Halus:

9. silty clay. highly calcareous .. 70 - 90
10.silty clay. noncalcareous .. 60 - 70
11.clay. Highly calcareous .. 70 - 80
12.clay. noncalcareous .. 50 - 70
Sumber:
Tekstur Ringan atau
Kasar:
coarse sandy loam 90

Loamy sand 80 Berkerikil :
very fine sand 80
Fine sand 65 Lempung-berpasir-halus 70-80
Berkerikil
sand 60
Coarse sand 30- Lempung Berkerikil 60-80
60
gravelly silt loam 60-80
gravelly sandy loam 50-70
gravelly clay loam 60-80
gravelly clay 40-70
Pasir Berkerikil 20-30
Sumber:
Penilaian Kondisi Berbatu:
Lempung-berpasir-halur 70-80
Berbatu
Lempung Berbatu 60-80
stony silt loam 60-80
stony sandy loam 50-70
stony clay loam 60-80

stony clay 40-70
Pasir berbatu 10-40
Sumber:
Penilaian Fdaktor C atas dasar Slope
A - Nearly level (0 to 2%) 100
AA - Gently undulating (0 to 2%) 95-100
B-Gently sloping (3 to 8%) 95-100
BB-Undulating (3 to 8%) 85-100
C-Moderately sloping (9-15%) 80-95
CC-Rolling (9 to 15%) 80-95
D-Strongly sloping (16 to 30%) 70-80
DD-Hilly (16 to 30%) 70-80
E - Curam (Slope 30 - 45%) 30-50
F Sangat Curam (45% dan lebih) 5-30
Sumber:
Penilaian Faktor X, selain
faktor A, B dan C
Drainage:
well-drained 100 Ketersediaan Hara
fairly well drained 1/ 80-90 (Tingkat Kesuburan
moderately Tanah):
40-80
waterlogged 2/ high 100
badly waterlogged 3/ 10-40 fair 95-100
subject to overflow variable
poor 80-95
Alkali: 4/
very poor 60-80
alkali-free 100
Acidity:
slightly affected 60-95
according to 80-95
moderately affected 30-60 degree 5/
moderately to
15-30
strongly affected
strongly affected 5-15
Sumber:
Penilaian Erosi Tanah:
Tidak ada erosi atau sedikit sekali 100
detrimental deposition 75-95
moderate sheet erosion 80-95
occasional shallow gullies 70-90
moderate sheet erosion with: shallow
60-80
gullies
deep gullies 10-70
moderate sheet erosion with: deep gullies 10-60
severe sheet erosion 50-80
severe sheet erosion with: shallow gullies 40-50
Jurang-erosi dalam 10-40
Erosi sangat parah 10-40
Erosi angin moderat 80-95
Erosi angin parah 30-80
Sumber:
Microrelief:
Rata-halus: Smooth 100
Channels 60-95
hogwallows 60-95
low hummocks 80-95
high hummocks 20-60
dunes 10-40
Sumber:
PENENTUAN GRADE TANAH
Ada enam GRADE Tanah yang dideskripsikan menurut kisaran
nilai indeks sbb:
1.Grade 1 (excellent): Soils that rate between 80 and 100

percent and which are suitable for a wide range of crops,
including alfalfa, orchard, truck, and field crops.
2. Grade 2 (good): Soils that rate between 60 and 79 percent and
which are suitable for most crops Yields are generally good to
excellent.
3. Grade 3 (fair): Soils that rate between 40 to 59 percent and
which are generally of fair quality, with less wide range of
suitability than grades 1 and 2 Soils in this grade may give good
results with certain specialized crops.
4. Grade 4 (poor): Soils that rate between 20 to 39 percent and
which have a narrow range in their agricultural possibilities For
example, a few soils in this grade may be good for rice, but not
good for many other uses.
5. Grade 5 (very poor): Soils that rate between 10 and 19 percent
are of very limited use except for pasture, because of adverse
Current terminology:
1/ moderately well drained

2/ somewhat poorly drained
3/ poorly to very poorly
drained
4/ salinity/sodicity
5/ pH less than 50
Sumber:
Tanah-tanah dinilai berdasarkan
Indeks Storie
This index expresses numerically the
relative degree of suitability, or value, of a
soil for general intensive agriculture. The
rating is based on soil characteristics only
and is obtained by evaluating such factors
as depth, texture of the surface soil,
intensity of subsoil, drainage, salts and
alkali, and relief.
Other factors, such as availability of water for
irrigation, climate, and distance from markets that
might determine the desirability
Sumber:
of growing certain
Empat faktor yang biasanya digunakan dalam

penilaian Indeks Storie.
Keempat Faktor ini adalah (A) karakteristik profil

tanah terutama permeabilitas dan kedalaman
tanah; (B) tekstur tanah permukaan; (C) slope; dan
(X) faktor atau pembatas lainnya, seperti
ketersediaan hara, banjir, drainage, salts dan
alkali, erosion, dan micro-relief.
Each of these four general factors is evaluated on

the basis of a 100 percent rating.
A rating of 100 percent expresses the most

favorable, or ideal condition; and lower percentage
Sumber:
Penilaian Indeks Storie untuk suatu tanah
diperoleh dengan mengalikan keempat faktor
tersebut, A, B, C, dan X; sehingga setiap faktor ikut
menentukan nilai akhir.
For example, a soil may have an excellent profile

justifying a rating of 100 percent for factor A;
excellent texture of the surface soil justifying 100
percent for factor B; a smooth nearly level surface
justifying 100 percent for factor C, but a high
accumulation of salts of alkali that would give a
rating of 10 percent for factor X.
Multiplying these four ratings gives an index rating
of 10 for this soil.
The high accumulation of salts or alkali would
Sumber:
Indeks Storie (i) untuk menilai suatu tanah
merupakan ekspresi numerik yg menyatakan
derajat sampai dimana kondisi tanah aktual sesuai
untuk pertumbuhan tanaman pada kondisi
lingkungan (iklim) yang baik.
Dalam menghitung Indeks Storie ini ada tiga faktor

yang dipertimbangkan, yaitu: Faktor A, profil
tanah; Faktor B, tekstur lapisan tanah permukaan;
dan Faktor C, pemodifikasi kondisi tanah, seperti
drainage, alkali, kemasaman, dll.
Each of these three factors is evaluated on a

percentage basis, the most favorable or ideal
conditions being rated as 100 percent.
Sumber:
The index method is a decided departure

from the usual score card methods of
judging and evaluating soils, in which the
various soil characteristics are given values
on the basis of 100 op 1000, and after
rating each characteristic on this basis, the
merits are added to ascertain the final
rating of the soil.
With many factors to be considered, no

single factor can be given very heavy
weight, and complete failure in one or more
features may stillSumber:
leave the soil rating
The multiplication of factors, A, B, and C permits
any one of these to completely dominate the index
rating.
For illustration, a soil may be a deep recent alluvial
deposit of fine sandy loam, probably as ideal in
profile and texture as one could find, and rating
100 percent for factors A and B. But if it was
heavily charged with alkali, its C rating might be 10
or lower.
Multiplying factors A, B, and C would give a final

index value of 10, while under the score card
method, where 'alkali would hardly be given a
value of more than 20 points, the rating would be
80 or more! Heavy accumulations of alkali would
absolutely dominate the soil, rendering it valueless
Sumber:
For use in California, the soil profiles, factor A, have been
divided into six groups, five being made up of secondary soils
and one of primary soils. In some eastern states, for instance,
Pennsylvania, this distribution might be reversed.
The primary soils could there well be divided into four or five
major groups, while the secondary soils could be combined
into one or two, with subgroups where necessary.
The soil series within each group are given ratings whose
value depends upon the character of the series profile,
particularly the characteristics of the subsoils or B horizons.
Profiles with deep subsoils pervious to water and roots, yet
sufficiently retentive to carry crops through moderate
drought periods and which are free from any stratification or
other conditions that would retard plant growth are rated as
100 percent.
Profiles with dense claypan subsoils or with hardpan horizons
are rated at 5 to 60 percent, depending on the density of the
claypan, or the depth to the hardpan.
Sumber:20 to 70, depending on the

Primary soils are rated at from
The B factor evaluates the character of the surface
soils, which are divided into four textural groups
light, medium, medium-heavy, and heavy textured,
with two additional groups to cover the textural
grades that include gravel and stone.
The B factor rates not only the soil texture, but
also those other characteristics that are more or
less dependent on texture, such as consistence,
porosity, permeability and tilth. These factors
determine the response of the soil to tillage
operations, the rate of water absorption, the
characteristics of the seedbeds and other features
that are vital in agricultural work.
Fine sandy loams, loams, and silt loams are

considered ideal and are rated as 100, while heavy
clays rate from 50 to 70. Stony sands may rate as
Sumber:
Factor C was found to be most difficult. It is intended to cover
those modifying conditions that are fundamentally related to
the soil, or are inherent in the soil itself.
Among these are conditions of excessive alkalinity or acidity

of the soil, marked infertility, conditions of poor drainage,
shallow, steep, or eroded phases untypical of the soil type,
and the like.
Most of these conditions are usually reflected in the soil
profile and are considered in the values assigned under
factor A. But the degree of intensity of those conditions, or
their irregular occurrence may not be expressed in the A or B
factors, hence the introduction of this C factor to cover such
conditions whenever they exist in sufficient degree as to
modify the soil-plant relationships.
Factors A and B essentially evaluate the Soil Type, factor A

covering the series characteristics and particularly those of
the subsoils or B horizons, while factor B covers the surface
Sumber:
soils or the A horizons.
Metode Indeks Storie bertumpu pada informasi

yang dikumpulkan dalam survei tanah, dan sangat
mudah dilakukan kalau survei tanah telah
diselesaikan. Kalau tidak ada survei tanah maka
harus dilakukan pengambilan contoh tanah lapisan
atas (topsoil) dan tanah lapisan bawah (subsoil).
Obviously, it is not possible to properly evaluate,

assess or appraise the soil without knowing the
facts regarding the soil characteristics, either
through the use of the soil maps, or by actual soil
exploration. Guesses as to soil conditions, based on
a look at growing crops or native cover, are usually
very unreliable and often misleading.
Sumber:
The Storie Index method is being used in California
by the assessors in several counties and by
appraisers for the Federal Land Bank and other
financial institutions.
In the Imperial Valley, where the climate, water

supply, transportation, markets, and conditions
other than those inherent in the soil are all quite
uniform, the index rating becomes essentially a
land evaluation.
In Riverside County, where the availability and

quality of irrigation water determines whether or
not the land can be used at all and where such
influences as micro-climate (with variations of only
a few degrees in minimum winter temperatures)
Sumber:
STORIE INDEX
The soils in the area, primarily used for

cropland, in the Sacramento Valley, and
rangeland, in the Coast Range foothills, are
rated in Table 10a according to the Storie
index (Storie, 1933; 1976).
The soils in the higher Coast Range,
primarily used for timberland, are in Table
10b according to the Storie index (Storie,
1948).
These indexes express numerically the
relative degree of suitability of a soil for
general intensive agricultural uses or
Sumber: http://lawr.ucdavis.edu/classes/ssc118/Colusa_County/storie.html
STORIE INDEX
Index for cropland and rangeland
The rating is based on soil characteristics and is obtained by
evaluating soil surface and subsurface chemical and physical
properties, as well as landscape surface features. The
original "Soil-Rating Chart" (Storie 1976).
Some of the terminology used in this chart is not used today.

However, when the ratings were developed, they were
compared to todays terminology to create the most logical
estimate for the rating.
Not considered in the rating are availability of water for

irrigation, local climate, size and accessibility of mapped
areas, distance to markets and other factors that might
determine the desirability of growing certain plants in a given
locality. Therefore, the index should not be used as the only
indicator of land value.
Where the local

Sumber: economic and geographic factors are known
http://lawr.ucdavis.edu/classes/ssc118/Colusa_County/storie.html
STORIE INDEX
INDEKS UNTUK LAHAN PERTANIAN &
GEMBALAAN
Empat faktor yg digunakan untuk
menentukan nilai Indeks:
1. Permeabilitas tanah, available water capacity,

and depth of the soil
2. Tekstur tanah lapisan permukaan
3. Slope dominan dari tubuh tanah
4. Kondisi lainnya Other conditions more readily
subject to management or modification by the
land user.
In this area these conditions include drainage and

flooding,
Sumber: salinity and alkalinity, fertility, acidity,
STORIE INDEX
INDEKS UNTUK LAHAN PERTANIAN
A rating of 100 percent expresses the most favorable, or
ideal, condition for general crop production. Lower
percentage ratings are assigned for less favorable
conditions or characteristics. Factor ratings, in
percentages, are selected from tables prepared from
data and yields. Certain properties are assigned a range
of values to allow for variations in the properties to
plant growth and crop yields. Certain properties are
assigned a range of values to allow for variations in the
properties that affect the suitability of the soil for
general agricultural purposes.
The index rating for a soil component of a map unit is

obtained by multiplying the percentage rating values
given to its four factors, A, B, C, and X.
If moreSumber:
thanhttp://lawr.ucdavis.edu/classes/ssc118/Colusa_County/storie.html
one condition is recognized for the X factor
STORIE INDEX
Indeks Untuk Lahan Tanaman dan Lahan
Gembalaan
If a map unit consists primarily of one named soil
series (a consociation), the index rating for the
named soil component equals the index rating for
the map unit. If a map unit consists of more than
one named component (a complex), ratings are
assigned to each named component (soil series or
miscellaneous area, such as "Rock outcrop").
Inclusions of other soils or minor components not
named in the map unit name, are not used in the
calculations.
Map units are assigned grades according to their
suitability for general intensive agriculture as
shownSumber:
by their Storie index ratings. The six grades
STORIE INDEX
INDEKS UNTUK LAHAN PERTANIAN
1.Grade 1 are well suited to intensively cultivated crops that are
climatically adapted to the region.
2. Grade 2 soils are good agricultural soils, although they are not so
desirable as soils in grade 1 because of a less permeable subsoil,
deep cemented layers (e.g., duripans), a gravelly or moderately
fine textured surface layer, moderate or strong slopes, restricted
drainage, low available water capacity, lower soil fertility, or a
slight or moderate hazard of flooding.
3. Grade 3 soils are only fairly well suited to agriculture because of
moderate soil depth; moderate to steep slopes, restricted
permeability in the subsoil; a clayey, sandy, or gravelly surface
layer; somewhat restricted drainage; acidity; low fertility; or a
hazard of flooding.
4. Grade 4 soils are poorly suited to agriculture. They are more
limited in their agricultural potential than the soils in grade 3
because of restrictions, such as a shallower depth; steeper
slopes; poorer drainage; a less permeable subsoil; a gravelly,
sandy, or clayey surface layer; channeled or hummocky
microrelief;
Sumber:acidity.
STORIE INDEX
INDEKS UNTUK LAHAN HUTAN
The rating is based on soil characteristics and is obtained by
evaluating soil surface and subsurface chemical and physical
properties, as well as climatic features. The original "Timber
Soil Rating Chart" (Storie 1948).
Some of the terminology used in this chart is not used today.
However, when the ratings were developed, they were
compared to todays terminology to create the most logical
estimate for the rating.
Not considered in the rating are size and accessibility of
mapped areas, distance to markets and other factors that
might determine the desirability of timber production in a
given locality. Therefore, the index should not be used as the
only indicator of timber production. Where the local economic
and geographic factors are known to the user, however, the
Storie index may provide additional objective information for
timber production.
Lima faktor yg digunakan untuk menentukan nilai indeks :
1. Kedalaman Tanah dan Tekstur tanah
STORIE INDEX
INDEKS UNTUK LAHAN HUTAN
The index rating for a soil component of a map unit is
obtained by multiplying the percentage rating values given to
its four factors, A, B, C, D, and E.
If a map unit consists primarily of one named soil series (a
consociation), the index rating for the named soil component
equals the index rating for the map unit. If a map unit
consists of more than one named component (a complex),
ratings are assigned to each named component, except rock
out crop. Miscellaneous areas are considered to be unsuited
for timber production, and are not rated or considered zero.
Inclusions of other soils or minor components not named in
the map unit name, are not used in the calculations.
Timber site ratings in percent were assigned adjective ratings
according to their suitability for general intensive timber
production as shown by figure 1 "Relationship Between
Timber Site Rating and Height - Age Index" in the appendices
showing the "Timber Soil Rating".
STORIE INDEX
KELAS
KAPABILITAS TANAH
UNIT KAPABILITAS TANAH
Unit
Ka-
Sifat Tanah atau Faktor Pembatas
pabilit
as
Ada bahaya aktual atau potensiao erosi tanah oleh air
1
atau angin.
Bahaya Drainage atau genangan (swp or poorly
2
drained, flooded or ponded)
Subsoil mempunyai permeabilitas lambat atau sangat
3
lambat.
4 Tekstur kasar atau berkerikil.
5 Tekstur halus atau snagat halus.
Salinity or alkali, sufficient to constitute a continuing
6
limitation or hazard.
Stones, cobbles, or rocks sufficient to interfere with
7
tillage.
Hardpan or hard unweathered bedrock within the
8
root zone.
Low inherent fertility, associated with strong acidity,
9
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Studi lapangan dimulai tahun 1947 untuk
menganalisis hubungan antara tanah, iklim dan
kualitas lokasi hutan tanaman (timber).
Empat faktor tanah disimpulkan mempengaruhi atau

membatasi pertumbuhan jenis conifers di California. Keempat
faktor ini adalah A Kedalaman tanah dan tekstur tanah; B
Permeabilitas tanah; C Karakteristik kimia tanah; D -
Drainage dan runoff. Selain itu juga ada faktor iklim.
High sites for growing conifers in California need a deep soil
of sufficiently fine textured to hold about 12% of more of
moisture; a permeable profile; have no toxic chemical
characteristics; be of acid reaction; well drained; and have a
total annual rainfall of more than 40 inches.
Hasil penilaian pendahuluan berdasarkan penetapan nilai
persentase untuk lima faktor : A Kedalaman tanah dan
tekstur; B permeabilitas tanah; C sifat kimia tanah; D -
Drainage dan runoff; E - Iklim.
Sumber: http://lawr.ucdavis.edu/classes/ssc118/Colusa_County/appendixc_b.html
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Timber Soil Rating Chart
Indeks untuk menilai kesesuaian tanah untuk Hutan Tanaman
Kayu di California
Faktor A: Depth-Texture (tidak ada efek penilaian untuk
tekstur dengan kapasitas air tersedia 12% atau lebih.)
Kelas
Kedalaman-Tekstur Nilai (%) Kedalama
n
Kedalaman lebih 72 100 5
60-72 90-100 5
48-60 80-90 5
36-48 70-80 4
24-36 50-70 3
12-24 30-50 2
0-12 0-30 1
Sumber:
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Faktor B: Permeabilitas Tanah
Kelompok
Permeabilitas Nilai (%)
Profil Tanah
Moderately
rapid & rapidly I; II; VII-I, II;
100
permeable VIII-I, II; IX-I, II
profiles
Moderately
III; III+; VII-III,
slow & slowly
80-90 III+; VIII-III,
permeable
III+; IX-III, III
profiles
Very slowly
IV; V; VII-IV;
permeable 30-70
VIII-IV; IX-IV
profile
Sumber:
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Faktor C: Kimia Tanah (Alkalinity, Salinity,
dll.)
Kelas
Efek
Nilai (%) Toksisit
Kimiawi
as
Tidak ada 100
Ringan 80-90 S
Moderat 20-80 M
Parah /
Berat / 0-20 A
Kuat
Sumber:
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Faktor D: Drainage-Runoff
Drainage
Drainage Nilai (%)
symbol
Well & moderately
100 w
well
Excessively 80-95 r
Somewhat poorly 40-80 i
Buruk dan Sangat
10-40 p
Buruk (Sgt Jelek)
Sumber:
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Faktor E: Iklim
CR--Coastal
CF--Coastal Fog WS--Westside ES--Eastside
Range (Douglas
(Redwood) Sierra (Pine) Sierra Pine (P.J.)
fir)
Rainfall Rating Rainfall Rating Rainfall Rating Rainfall Rating

(in.) percen (in.) percen (in.) perce (in.) percent
t t nt
45 120 45 100 45 100 40 90

40 110 40 95 40 95 35 80
35 100 35 90 35 90 30 70
30 90 30 60-70 30 50-60 25 60
25 80 25 30 25 20 20 50
20 30 15 40
Sumber:
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Pentingnya Klasifikasi Tanah dan Penilaian
Tanah bagi Lokasi Hutan Timber
Klasifikasi tanah bersama dengan nilai tanah untuk

kualitas lokasi hutan tanaman (timber) akan
memperkuat survei sumberdaya hutan di California
melalui dua cara:
First it will facilitate and improve the quality of the

timber site classification. Previously this
classification has been base entirely on the height-
age relationship of dominant trees without
reference to the soil. Ratings were satisfactorily
made where dominants were present, as in the
case of virgin timber or older second growth.
On the other hand difficulties
Sumber:
were encountered in
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Pentingnya Klasifikasi Tanah dan Penilaian
Tanah bagi Lokasi Hutan Timber
Di beberapa lokasi, dimana tidak ada pertumbuhan

tegakan kayu timber, maka tidak dapat ditentukan
apakah lokasi itu sesuai untuk hutan tanaman kayu
timber.
Kesulitan ini dicoba diatasi dengan jalan menilai
lokasi tersebut berdasarkan kualitas tanahnya.
Second, the maps produced by the survey, since

they show the location of good, fair, poor, and
unsuitable sites for growing various kinds of timber
trees, will have greater usefulness to those
interested in managing forest lands for timber
crops.
Sumber:
TIMBER SOIL RATINGS
Hubungan antara Rating Tapak Hutan dengan
Indeks tinggi-umur
Sumber : http://lawr.ucdavis.edu/classes/ssc118/Colusa_County/appendixc_b.html
STORIE INDEX OF SOILS
Sumber: STELA April 2013

Stela Metode Storie Index Soil Rating

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Deskripsi Asli:

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Stela Metode Storie Index Soil Rating

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

METODE SISR

STORIE INDEX SOIL RATINGS

PENILAIAN INDEKS STORIE

Sumber: STELA April 2013

Analisisnya mudah dilakukan,

Indeks dihitung dengan perkalian parameter ini,

Under this system, soils deemed less than prime

The six grades, ranges in index rating, and

Indesk Storie merupakan metode semi-

Indeks Storie menduga produktivitas tanah

Program pemetaan lahan pertanian ini dilakukan

Kkriteria pemetaan lahan juga dimodifikasi terus

Kriteria pemetaan lahan menggunakan sistem

Unit-unit lahan yng kurang dari 10 acre

Each is summarized below, based on A Guide to

Local Farmland of local importance is land of

It is independent of other physical or

Nilai-nilai persentase dari empat faktor itu

Karakteristik profil tanah (faktor A) pada

For example, soils that are deep and readily

Penilaian kemiringan lahan dimasukkan dalam

Nearly level or gently sloping land is rated at

Kondisi eksklusif profil, tekstur tanah, dan

These conditions consist of drainage,

If two or more conditions exist that are

SOIL - RATING CHART

(Storie Soil Index rating =

Faktor A: Kelompok Profil Tanah

Soil development is defined as the presence of

Faktor A: Kelompok Profil Tanah

Soils with abrupt textural changes (claypan),

Faktor B: Tekstur Tanah Lapisan

Rock fragment content is used to modify

Characteristics considered are drainage

In our NASIS-based Storie Index, interpretation

Our model uses fuzzy rule sets to more

Gelisols, Histosols, Spodosols, Oxisols, Dan

Landform type, a data field stored

Pada umumnya semua tanah-tanah Entisols, Inceptisols,

Crisp limits for Fuzzy rule - less is

Growing Flooding - Erosion Drainag EC - SAR - pH -

Misalnya, tanah Palexeralf (tanah dengan lapisan cadas liat)

Semua tanah dengan anasir formatif Duri, Petro,

A flag was placed in the model so that

Group VII hingga IX dalam Storie 1978

The fuzzy logic rule more is better, in

The following textures were not listed in

These missing textural classes were

Fungsi ini mengurangi subyektivitas yg

Misalnya dalam Storie 1978 :

Xcf x Xhp = Faktor X

In order to obtain more quantitative indices for

Tanah-tanah mendapatkan nilai 100% hingga

Scores for a particular erosion class were higher

The minimum depth to saturated conditions encountered

Flooding frequency is an estimate of the number

The scores for a particular flooding duration class

Indeks yang dihitung dengan Model NASIS ini

The NASIS model is a data-driven tool that reduces

For Factor A, profile groups were condensed from

We also eliminated Profile Group VI in Storie 1978

None 100 None 100

Excessively drained and