Agriculture PDF
Agriculture PDF
Heny Herawati
Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Jawa Tengah, Bukit Tegalepek, Kotak Pos 101, Ungaran 50501
Telp. (024) 6924965, 6924967, Faks. (024) 6924966, E-mail: bptp-jateng@litbang.deptan.go.id
ABSTRAK
Pati adalah karbohidrat yang merupakan polimer glukosa, terdiri atas amilosa dan amilopektin. Pemanfaatan pati
asli masih sangat terbatas karena sifat fisik dan kimianya kurang memungkinkan untuk dimanfaatkan secara luas.
Pati tahan cerna (resistant starch/RS) merupakan fraksi pati yang tahan terhadap hidrolisis oleh enzim pencernaan
amilase serta perlakuan pulunase secara in vitro. RS merupakan produk pati termodifikasi dan terbagi menjadi
empat tipe, yaitu RS1, RS2, RS3, dan RS4. Proses produksi RS bergantung pada tipe pati yang akan dihasilkan, yang
meliputi modifikasi fisik, kimia, dan biokimia. Masing-masing proses produksi tersebut akan memengaruhi
karakteristik RS yang dihasilkan. RS memiliki nilai fungsional untuk fortifikasi serat, mengurangi kalori, dan
mengoksidasi lemak. Berdasarkan proses produksi, karakteristik, nilai fungsional, maupun alternatif
pemanfaatannya, RS memiliki potensi cukup besar untuk dikembangkan sebagai produk pangan fungsional bagi
kesehatan.
Kata kunci: Pati, pati tahan cerna, pati modifikasi, proses produksi, pangan fungsional
ABSTRACT
The potential of resistant starch product development as functional food
Starch is a carbohydrate which consists of amylose and amylopectin. Utilization of native starch is still limited due
to unappropriate physical and chemical characteristics for its broaden use. Resistant starch (RS) is a starch fraction
that is unhydrolyzed with amylase and pullunase digestive enzymes in vitro. RS is a modified starch and classified
into four types, i.e. RS1, RS2, RS3, and RS4. RS production processes are highly depending on the types of RS
produced, such as physically, chemically, and biochemically. These production processes influence the product
characteristics. RS has a function of dietary fiber enrichment, calory reduction, and fat oxidation. Based on
production processes, characteristics, functional values, and utilization alternatives, RS has high potential to be
developed as functional food for human health.
Keywords: Starch, resistant starch, modified starches, production process, functional food
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Asp, N.G. 1992. Resistant starch. Proceeding of Bjorck I.M. and Nyoman M.E. 1987. In vitro Hustiany, R. 2006. Modifikasi Asilasi dan Suk-
the Second Plenary of EURESTA: European effects of phytic acid and polyphenols on sinilasi Pati Tapioka sebagai Bahan Enkap-
FLAIR Concerted Action No. 11 on Physio- starch digestion and fiber degradation. J. sulasi Komponen Flavor. Disertasi, Institut
logical Implications of the Consumption of Food Sci. 52: 1588–1994. Pertanian Bogor.
Resistant Starch in Man. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.
Boyer and J.C. Shanon. 1983. Plant breeding. Jacobs, H. and J.A. Delcour. 1998. Hydrothermal
46 (Suppl 2): S1.
Plant Breed. Rev. 1139. modifications of granular starch with reten-
Asp, N.G. and I. Bjorck. 1992. Resistant starch. tion of the granular structure: Review. J.
Chaplin, M. 2002. Starch. http://www.sbu.ac.uk. Agric. Food Chem. 46(8): 2895−2905.
Trends Food Sci. Technol. 3(5): 111–114.
[25 March 2003].
Atichokudomchai, N., S. Shonbsngob, P. Chi- Jay, M.G. 2004. Resistant starch: Safe intakes
Eliasson, A.C. 1996. Carbohydrates in Foods. and legal status. J. AOAC Int. 87(3): 733−
nachoti, and S. Varavinit. 2001. A study of
University of Lund, Swedia. 739.
some physicochemical properties of high-
crystalline tapioca starch. Starch/Starke 53: Englyst, H.N., H.S. Wiggins, and J.H. Cummings. Khatijah, I. 2000. Effect of reaction pH and
577−581. 1982. Determination of the non-starch concentration of phosphorus oxychloride
polysaccharides in plant foods by gas-liquid on cross-linking of tapioca starch (abstract).
Atichokudomchai, N., S. Varavinit, and P. China-
chromatography of constituent sugars as J. Trop. Agric. Food Sci. 28: 95−100.
choti. 2002. Gelatinization transitions of
alditol acetates. Analyst. 107: 307–318.
acid-modified tapioca starches by differential Laurentin, A. and C.A. Edwards. 2004. Differen-
scanning calorimetry (DSC). Starch/Starke Englyst, H.N., S.M. Kingman, and J.H. Cummings. tial fermentation of glucose-based carbo-
54: 296−302. 1992. Classification and measurement of hydrates in vitro by human faecal bacteria. A
nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur. study of pyrodextrinised starches from dif-
Atichokudomchai, N. and S. Varavinit. 2003.
J. Clin. Nutr. 46: S33–S50. ferent sources. Eur. J. Nutr. 43(3): 183–189.
Characterization and utilization of acid-
modified cross-linked tapioca starch in Faraj, A., T. Vasanthan, and R. Hoover. 2004. Liljeberg, H., A. Akerberg, and I. Bjorck. 1996.
pharmaceutical tablets. Carbohydrate Poly- The effect of extrusion cooking on resistant Resistant starch formation in bread as influ-
mers 53: 262−270. starch formation in waxy and regular barley enced by choice of ingredients or baking
flours. Food Res. Int. 37(5): 517–525. conditions. Food Chem. 56(4): 389–394.
Aust, L., G. Dongowski, U. Frenz, A. Taufel, and
R. Noack. 2001. Estimation of available Garcia-Alonso, A., A. Jimenez-Escrig, N. Martin- Liu, Z., L. Peng, and J.F. Kennedy. 2005. The
energy of dietary fibres by indirect calori- Carron, L. Bravo, and F. Saura-Calixto. 1999. technology of molecular manipulation and
metry in rats. Eur. J. Nutr. 40(1): 23−29. Assessment of some parameters involved in modification. Asisted by Microwaves as
the gelatinization and retrogradation of Applied to Starch Granules. Carbohydrate
Baghurst, K., P.A. Baghurst and S.j. Record. 2001.
starch. Food Chem. 66: 181–187. Polymers, 61: 374−378.
Dietary fiber, nonstarch polysacharide and
resistant starch intakes in Australia. In: G.A. Hamilton, R.M. and E.F. Paschall. 1967. Pro- Marconi E., S. Ruggeri, M. Cappelloni, D.
Spliller, (Ed). CRC handbook of dietary fiber duction and uses of starch phosphates. p. Leonardi, and E. Carnovale. 2000. Related
in human health. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC 351–365. In R.L. Whistler, E.F. Paschall physicochemical, nutritional, and micro-
Press. p. 583−591. (Ed.), Starch: Chemistry & Technology. Vol. structural characteristics of chickpeas (Cicer
II. Academic Press, New York and London. arietinum L.) and common beans (Phaseolus
Behall, K.M. and J.C. Howe. 1996. Resistant
vulgaris L.) following microwave cooking.
starch as energy. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 15(3): Haynes, L., N. Gimmler, J.P. Locke, M.R.
J. Agric. Food Chem. 48(12): 5986–5994.
248−254. Kweon, L. Slade, and H. Levine. 2000.
Process for making enzyme-resistant starch Marsono, Y. dan D.L. Topping. 1999. Effects
Belitz, H.D. and W. Grosch. 1999. Food
for reduced-calorie flour replacer. US Patent of particle size of rice on resistant starch
Chemistry. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
6,013,299. 11 January 2000. Nabisco Tech- and SCFA of the digesta in caecostomised
Berry, C.S. 1986. Resistant starch. Formation nology Co., Wilmington, Del. pigs. Indonesia Food Nut Prog. 6(2): 44−
and measurement of starch that survives 50.
Higgins, J.A., D.R. Higbee, W.T. Donahoo, I.L.
exhaustive digestion with amylolytic en-
Brown, M.L. Bell, and D.H. Bessesen. 2004. Mcnaught, K.J., E. Maloney, and A.T. Knight.
zymes during the determination of dietary
Resistant starch consumption promotes lipid 1998. High amylose starch and resistant
fiber. J. Cereal Sci. 4: 301–314.
oxidation. Nutr. Metabolism 1: 8. starch fractions. United States Patent
5714600.