Problem statement
Highlight on the study’s gap, is it empirical?
Methodology? Or theory?
Research Questions
State your research questions
Objektif kajian
Apa tujuan utama kajian ini dilakukan
Research objective
State your research objectives
Introduction
A simple introduction and the contents
included in the methodology section
Panduan yang digunakan
Menyatakan dan menjelaskan tentang
preferred reporting items yang digunakan.
Reporting items ni macam guidelines la
yang dirujuk untuk buat systematic review.
Ada beberapa jenis, antara yang paling
kerap org gunakan ialah PRISMA.
Guidelines ni banyak disediakan untuk
bidang perubatan dan kesihatan, jadi kena
pandai kaitkan ia dengan bidang kajian
Guidelines used
Declare and explain about the preferred
reporting items used. It is a guideline that
you are referring to in making your
systematic review. There are several types,
among the most commonly used by
researchers is PRISMA. Many of these
guidelines are available for medical and
healthcare, try to fit it in your study.
Resources
Terangkan databases yang digunakan
untuk systematic review proses anda –
Scopus? Web of Science? Etc…Terangkan
kelebihan yang database ini kerana ia akan
memberikan justifikasi kukuh mengapa ia
dipilih sebagai rujukan utama
Result 1
In this section, you should identify the
pattern of findings by previous studies and
try to discuss it.
Discussion 1
Your discussion needs to be details and in-
depth. Include element of critical review. A
Query technique helps to generate critical
ideas to writers.
Perbincangan 2
Discussion 2
Perbincangan 3
Discussion 3
Rumusan Pengenalan
(Conclusion) Introduction
Apa yang telah dicapai?
Huraikan
Describe on what has been
achieved? Explain
Apa yang harus ditumpukan
oleh penyelidik bagi kajian
akan datang? Huraikan
What should researchers focus
for future studies? Explain
Apa yang harus ditumpukan
oleh penyelidik bagi kajian
akan datang? Huraikan
What should researchers focus
for future studies? Explain
Rujukan (References)
TEMPLATE ARTIKEL DR HAYROL – SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
The selection criteria can be set by referring to the REFINE RESULTS section on the left site of the database (referring to Scopus and
Science Direct, which may differ for the Web of Science). The criteria are based on researcher's needs and interests; there is no standard
for selection criteria.
You should use a thesaurus and refer to previous studies to get all the words that have a similar meaning as your keywords. YOU MUST
come to the Information Searching Strategy class or consult the librarian to learn more about the methods mentioned in Table 2. By using
this method, only suitable and related articles that fit to the keywords will be displayed in the database
TEMPLATE ARTIKEL DR HAYROL – SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Example from: Shaffril, H.A.M., Abu Samah, A., & D’Silva, J.L (2017). Climate change: Social adaptation strategies for fishermen. Marine
Policy, 81, 256-261.
TEMPLATE ARTIKEL DR HAYROL – SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Example from – Vancamfort, D., Hallgren, M., Firth, J., Rosenbaum, S., Schuch, F.B., Mugisha, J., Probst, M., Van Damme, T., Carvalho, A.F.,
& Stubbs, B. (2018). Physical activity and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Affective Disorder, 225, 438-
448.