Anda di halaman 1dari 8

Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.

1, Mei 2018

THE EFFECT OF DEFINITIONS TOWARD STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY


Tawali
English Department, FPBS IKIP Mataram
tawaliyosi@gmail.com

Abstract
This research is aimed to find out the effect of definitions toward students’ vocabulary mastery:
it was an experimental study at the second grade student of MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang-
sayang. The subject of this research was the second grade of MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang-
sayang.The research was used experimental method with quantitative approach. The population
of this research consist of 55 students, and the sample is 29 for experimental group while 26 for
control group. The technique of collecting data was used definition for experimental group and
matching word with antonym for control group. The data was collected by using post-test only
and the data was analyzed by t-test formula. Based on data analysis the mean score of
experimental group was 76,4 and control group was 69,23, beside of that standard deviation for
experimental group was 114,28 and for control group was 113,09 and the value of t-test was
2,44 and t-table was 2,000. Degree of freedom is 53 with significant level 0,05. It means that
the value of t-test was higher than t-table (t-test ˃ t-table). The alternative hypothesis (Ha) was
accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. Thus, the conclusion of this research was there
was an effect of definition toward students’ vocabulary mastery: an experimental study at the
second grade students of MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang-sayang.

Key Words: Definition, Vocabulary

Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan dampak definisi strategy terhadap penguasaan kosa
kata siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian experiment pada sekolah MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin
Sayang-sayang. Subjek pada penelitian ini adalah kelas dua MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang-
sayang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi pada penelitian
ini terdiri dari 55 siswa, dan sampelnya adalah 29 untuk experimental grup sedangkan 26 untuk
control grup. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah pre-test dan post-test. Testnya
dalam bentuk pilihan ganda. Pilihan ganda terdiri dari 25 item dengan 4 pilihan. Berdasarkan
analisis data, nilai mean dari experimental grup adalah 76,4 dan control grup adalah 69,23,
disamping itu standar deviasi untuk experimental grup adalah 114,28 dan control grup adalah
113,09 dan nilai dari t-test adalah 2,44 dan t-table adalah 2,000. Tingkat kebebasan adalah 53
dengan signifikan level 0,05. Artinya bahwa t-test lebih besar dari pada t-table (t-test ˃ t-table).
Alternatif hypothesis (Ha) telah diterima dan null hypothesis (Ho) telah ditolak. Kesimpulan
dari penelitian ini adalah ada efek dari definisi terhadap kosa kata siswa: experimental study
pada kelas dua MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang-sayang.

Kata Kunci: Definisi, Kosa Kata

expressing their idea. Vocabulary is useful


INTRODUCTION
Vocabulary is fundamental in learning for the students in order to communicate in
a language, therefore, teaching vocabulary daily life and would be strengthen believe
plays important roles in language acquisition that English language can be used to express
because the mastery vocabulary would help some ideas, thought, and feeling
the students in mastery all language skill (Finocchiaro, 1974: 38). English language
such as, listening, speaking, reading and has been used as a means of an interaction or
writing skill. More vocabulary recognized communication throughout the world to
the better student in practicing and reach specific purposes.

34
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2018

Based on the explanation above, a before and understanding new message. The
language cannot be separated from third feature of language is arbitrariness.
vocabulary that is why the mastery of There is almost no predictability in many of
vocabulary is the most important aspect in characteristics and there is almost never any
acquiring a second language or foreign connection object. The forth feature is
language. Now days English language is interchange ability in the human being can
almost used in all over the world, it is used be both a producer and receiver messages.
as the first or second language. In Indonesia, The fifth feature is specialization which
English language is used as a foreign refers to the fact that communicating
language has been introduced since organism should not have a total physical
elementary school even in play groups. In involvement in the fact communication. The
fact, even though vocabulary is taught from sixth natural language is that culture
elementary school until college, but the transmission which refers to the fast that the
student still get difficulties to mastery details of the linguistic most be learned a
vocabulary in English language. So, the new big each speaker. They are not
teacher should prepare some kinds of new biologically transmitted from generation to
method to make student easily to reach more generation. From the feature language above
vocabulary. the writer concludes that language for
In mastering vocabulary, definitions is communication which has sound and
one of the activities in teaching vocabulary meaning particularly human language
that can make student enjoyable and has productivity, arbitrariness, interchange
challenge, beside of that this activities can ability, specialization and culture
works in pairs or groups. So, the student can transmission by which the language should
avoid ambiguity and clarify the meaning of by new generation notes the innate capacity
the word by definition. like possessed by animals. Language is one
Based on the explanation above, the of the most typical characteristics of human,
writer interested in investigating the effect of which distinguishes them from another
definition toward students’ vocabulary creature. The science, which studies the
mastery, and this process of this study essence and the characteristics of the
occurred in MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang- language, belongs to linguistics. It
sayng Based on the background above, the investigates the element of language and the
writer wants to answer the question below: relationship among them to serve the
“Is the definition effective toward students’ function of the language as instrument of
vocabulary for the second grade students of interconnection among human beings
MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang-sayng. (Alwasilah, 1989: 2).
Language is a system of
Review of Related Literature
communications by sound, i.e. through the
The Nature of Language organs of speech and hearing, among human
An important feature of language as beings of certain group or community, using
stated by Boey (1975: 25) is duality the fast vocal symbol possessing arbitrary
that contains subsystem, one of sound and conventional meaning (Alwasilah, 1989:
the other of meaning and then these units of 17).
meaning grouped into an infinitive number
of sentences. The second feature is General Concept of Vocabulary
productivity. This feature refers to the fact In some literatures, we found out the
that languages provides opportunities for meaning of vocabulary, vocabulary
sending message that have never been sent according to Finocchiaro (1974: 73) states

35
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2018

that students’ vocabulary can divide into two have to decide how many new words in a
kinds, namely active vocabulary and passive lesson students should learn.
vocabulary. First active vocabulary refers to Need: The choice of words has to
the words in which the students can relate to the aims of teaching. (Wallace,
understand and pronounce the words 1982: 28) says that it is also possible for the
correctly and use them constructively in teacher to put the responsibility of choosing
speaking or writing. Second passive the vocabulary to be taught for the students.
vocabulary refers to the words in which the
Frequent Exposure and Repetition
students can recognize and understand while The teacher could not only introduce
there are readings and listening to someone new words once, but the teacher has to
speaking, but they do not use the words and hearse the words several times to make sure
speaking and writing. whether or not the students already
The purpose of teaching vocabulary is comprehend the words. (Wallace, 1982: 29)
to help the students bring and the meaning states that there has to be a certain amount of
from words sign, signal and symbols. The
repetition until there is evidence that
goal of teaching vocabulary, the students students have learned the target word.
must be taught in many things about words Meaningful Presentation: “The learner
and their meaning as well as the words must have a clear and specific understanding
themselves. of what it denotes or refers to, i.e. its
Teaching vocabulary is not only meaning”(Wallace, 1982: 29). This requires
teaching student to memorize the words but that the words be presented in a way that its
also bring them to analyze and implicate the denotation or reference is perfectly clear and
words in writing sentence. Building up unambiguous.
vocabulary into context is a challenging task Situation Presentation : The students
for teacher. By the age of 1, 5 years or so, should learn words in situation in which they
children may have around fifty words, and a are appropriate: “The choice of words can
couple of years later, may have several vary according to the situation in which we
hundreds. are speaking and according how well we
Tarigan (1982: 2) states that the know the person, to whom we are speaking
quality of someone`s language very much (from formal to informal)”.
depends on his or her vocabulary quality and From the principle above, in teaching
quantity. It means that the bigger quality and
learning process the teacher should be able
quantity of someone`s vocabulary, the better to identify who are the students, what are
is his or her language will be. their needs, and how should the teacher
In teaching vocabulary, there are teach in simple and interesting way.
several principles for teacher as Different age of students indicate that they
consideration. The principles Wallace (1982: also have different needs and interest.
73) are: Learning words is more like continual
Aims: “How many of the things listed process of trying to keep a house clean; the
does the teacher expect the learner to be able cleaning (or learning) can be done one day,
to achieve the vocabulary what kinds of but needs doing again the next. Vocabulary
word? (Wallace, 1982: 27). The aims have to needs to be met and recycled at intervals, in
be clear for the teacher before the teach different activities, with the knowledge and
vocabulary to the students. new connection developed each time the
Quantity: “The teacher may have to same words met again (Cameron, 2001: 84).
decide on number of vocabulary items to be
learnt (Wallace, 1982: 27). The teachers
36
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2018

Hatch and Brown (1995: 572) describe vocabulary are recognized when one has the
five essential steps in vocabulary learning capability of reading and writing.
based on research into learners` strategies:
Having source for encountering new words; In other word, the above statement about the
Getting a clear image, whether visual or types of vocabulary. A vocabulary has to be
auditory or both, for the forms of the new learned from the simple to the difficult word.
words; Learning the meaning of the words; Starting from listening to the word,
Making a strong memory connection understanding it and then speaking it. The
between the forms and meaning of the learner will not be burden in learning a
words; Using the words. foreign language if the teachers offer the
In some literatures, we found out the language from the simple level to the higher
meaning of vocabulary, vocabulary level.
according to Finocchiaro (1974: 73) states Concept of Definition
that students’ vocabulary can divide into two The definition is a statement that gives
kinds, namely active vocabulary and passive meaning to a word or phrase (Solomon,
vocabulary. First active vocabulary refers to 1985: 234). The definition is an explanation
the words in which the students can of the meaning of a word (Rescher, 1964:
understand and pronounce the words 30). An explanation should make clear
correctly and use them constructively in definitions and related to the word that is not
speaking of writing. Second passive the object.
vocabulary refers to the words in which the The definition has the task to determine
students can recognize and understand while the extent of an understanding of the precise,
there are readings and listening to someone clear and concise. That determines the
speaking, but they do not use the words boundaries of certain meaning, clear what is
speaking and writing. meant, not blurred and not confused with
Types of Vocabulary other concepts.
Learning a language will mean nothing Good definition must have the following
without learning is vocabulary. Regarding requirements: first, formulate a clear,
the type of vocabulary, Quadt (1966: 34) complete and concise all the basic elements
categories vocabulary into four types: (1) or content a certain sense; second, elements
Listening vocabulary: This type is developed that are necessary and sufficient to find out
early since a child begins to recognize what exactly the object (no more and no
sound. It is limited only to the sound hear less); third, thus clearly distinguishable
which is associated with this experience. (2) from all other goods.
Speaking vocabulary: This type vocabulary In each defines are divided into two
is also built early, that is time when the child part, namely : first, genera (genus) in
begins to communicate with the English known as type; second, differentia
surrounding. The application of vocabulary (difference), in English known as the
at this stage is very simple and it contains distinguishing properties. So, defining a
many of the small function words, which is word is to analyze the type and nature of
kind of vocabulary can make up a speech. distinguishing it contains. Genera we call to
(3) Vocabulary of reading and writing. (4) bring our minds because the genera of an
These types of vocabulary are developed item or object will be easily recognizable,
almost at the same time. However, reading including what group , and mention of
vocabulary usually come earlier that differentia we will come to understand that
vocabulary writing. These types of we define the word. Using the example

37
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2018

above, we can see that the father is the students divided into two groups to decide
defined um whereas the male parent is the which one as control and experimental group
defines, we can differentiate to become , they are A class as experimental group and
parents as genera and men as differentia. B class as control group. Therefore this
research which is called population research
RESEARCH METHOD
or research subject.
Research Design
In present study, the researcher Research Instrument
employed the appropriate method to obtain The term instrumentation refers to a
the data properly in order to answer the group of permanent systems which help us
statement of the problem displayed in to measure objects and maintain retroactive
chapter one. The researcher delivered an control of a process (Placko, 2000: 5).
experimental research. Singh (2006: 171) Instrument is tool or device to measure
states that an experimental design is a plan capability, intellectual, of the student and the
or strategy of investigation conceived to instrument of this study is test, the test was
solve the research problem. This study in the form of multiple choices consisting of
belonging to quasi-experimental. This study 25 questions with 4 options. If each
uses Non Randomized Two Groups Post-test questions correct answer would scored 4 and
only Design. The method of this study was incorrect answer would scored 0.
quantitative method; the data collection was Technique of Data Analysis
based on the result of students’ experimental After gathering the score from post-
group and control group. test the writer began analyzing by using
formula below :
Population and Sample
The population is all individuals of Identifying the mean score of experimental
interest to the researcher (Marczyk, and control group
Dematteo & Festinger, 2005: 18). In this ∑
case, the population of the research was the =
second grade of MA Ishlahul Ikhwan NW Where :
Mispalah Praya in academic year = the mean score of experimental or
2013/2014, there were two classes, namely control group
A class and B class, which A class consist of Σ = the sum of experimental or control group
29 students while B class consist of 26 x = any score of experimental or control
students. The total number of students was group
55 students. N = the number of sample of experimental or
After identifying a list of possible control group (Miller, 2005: 67)
participants, the next step was to select a 2. Regarding the deviation of the two
sample. A sample is a smaller group selected groups, the researcher also calculates
from a larger population (Marguento, Dean standard deviation of the two scores by using
& Kathereine, 2006:143). In this case, the the following formula :
∑ ²
researcher took the sample by using = -
probability sample technique. Dawson Where:
(2007: 50) states that, in probability samples, S² = the Variance of a set of scores
all people within the research population S = Standard Deviation of experimental
have a specifiable chance of being selected. or control group
So in this research, the researcher took all of
= the mean score of experimental or
the population as sample and then the
control group

38
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2018

x= any score of experimental or control (2005: 67) is used as it had been explained in
group chapter III (research method). Before
Σ = the sum of experimental or control group coming to the statistical computation of the
(Miller, 2005: 67) data, it was important to present the
3. From the results of the students’ mean students’ deviation scores on post-test. The
score and the standard deviation of two researcher continued to calculate the scores
groups, the researcher continued to find out of post–test of the experimental group and
the t-test control group.
The discussion in this part of study deals
=
with the analysis scores of the test.
Researcher continued to calculate the mean
Where:
scores, standard deviation scores and t-test
t : computation of correlation
of experimental group and control group.
: the mean score of experimental group
And analysis of scores could be formulated
: the mean score of control group as follows.
: the number of sample of experimental
group Finding mean score of experimental group
: the number of sample of control group and control group
: the standard deviation of experimental a. Mean score of experimental group

group =
: the standard deviation of control group = 2216
 : the root of ………………… 29
(Miller, 2005: 67) = 76,4
b. Mean score of control group
RESEARCH FINDING ∑
In this chapter, the researcher presented =
the result of the study. The score of
experimental group and control group of =
post-test were taken from the data of the
study. Therefore, the researcher presented a = 69,23
discussion in order to answer the statement Calculating the standard deviation scores of
of problem which appeared or as formulated the experimental and control groups by
in the previous chapter (chapter 1) “Is using the following formula:
definition effective toward students’ Standard deviation of experimental
vocabulary for the second grade students of group

MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin Sayang-sayng ?” = −
To answer this problem above, the
researcher analyzed the data obtained from
post-test scores of both experimental group = – 76,4
and control group. Then, the researcher
presented the statistical computation of mean = 5951,24 – 5836,96 = 114,28
score of both groups. Later on, the Standard deviation of control group
discussion was continued by analyzing the ∑
finding. The statistical computation covered = –
the calculation of both experimental group = – 69,23
and control group. In this case, finishing
= 4905,88 – 4792,79
formula of t-test such as suggested by Miller

39
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2018

= 113,09 with df of 53. It was measured from the t-


Finding the standard deviation scores of table and the critical value was 2,000 at the
the two groups, the researcher continued level of significance 0,05. Based on the data
to find out t-test found above, the researcher compared
̅ ̅ between t-test and t-table values. The result
=
showed that t-test was higher than t-table, it
means that Definition was effective toward
= students’ vocabulary.
, , ) BIBLIOGRAPHY
, , ( ) Cameron, L. 2001. Teaching Language in
, √
Young Learner. United Kingdom
=
, , ( )
Copi, Irving M, Introduction to Logic, 2nd
ed. The Macmillan Company, New
, √ York, 1976
= ,
√ Dawson, Catherine. 2007. A Practical Guide
, , to Research Method. Begbroke. Oxford
= , Ox5.1RX. United Kingdom.

Finocchiaro. Mary.1974, English as a
,
= Second Language from Theory to
,
Practice. New York: Regents Publishing
= 2,44 Company.inc
Hatch, E and Brown H, 1995. Research
find out degrees of freedom Design and Statistical for Applied
Linguistic. Newbury House Publisher.
df = + –2
Inc: London.
= 29 + 26 – 2
Heaton, J.B, 1976. Writing English
= 53
Language Test. Longman Group
t-table Limited London.
Hornby, 1981. Oxford Advance Learner’
Degree of
t-test Freedom 0,05 Dictionary of Current English. Oxford
University Press.
2,44 53 2,000
Hornby, A.S. 1989. Oxford Advance
Learners Dictionary of Current English.
CONCLUSION London, Oxford University Press.
After doing the analysis of the data, the J. Wallace. 1982. Teaching Vocabulary.
researcher found that the mean score of London: Cambridge University Press
experimental group was higher than the Lado, R, 1977. Language Testing. London:
control group. The mean score of Longman Group.
experimental group was 76,4 and the mean Lanur, Alex, Logika Selayang Pandang,
score of control group was 69,23 while the Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 1998
standard deviation of experimental group Miller Steve. 1984. Experimental Design
was 114,28 and the standard deviation of and Statistics. London and New York
control group was 113,09. Placko Dominique. 2000. Fundamentals of
But the result above did not guarantee Instrumentation and Measurement.
the significance, therefore the t-test was used USA.
to find out it. The value of t-test was 2,44

40
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, Vol. 6 No.1, Mei 2018

Quadt, 1966. The Effectiveness of Tarigan. 1982, Pengajaran Kosa Kata .


Consolidation Stage in Teaching Bandun
Vocabulary, Unpublisher
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Rescher, Nicholas, Introduction to Logic, St. I would like to thank God and Head
Martinis Press, New York, 1964 Master and staff MTs NW Haqqul Yaqin
Singh, Kumar Yogesh.2006. Fundamental of Sayang-sayang, for their helpful comments
Research Methodology of Statistics. till this project can be accomplished on time.
New Delhi: New Age International I would also like thanks to Joel for
Solomon, Robert C., Introducing Philosophy publishing my literary work. Additional
: A Text With Readings, 3rd ed., thanks go to Dr. Lalu Ari Irawan, M.Pd., SE.
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., as the leader of publisher. Finally I would
Florida, 1985 like to thank all participants for their
supporting in this project.

41

Anda mungkin juga menyukai