LAPORAN PRAKTIKUM

ILMU PENYAKIT TANAMAN

DISEASES AND YIELD LOSS ASSESMENT

Iwe Cahyati

A3502201002

PLANT PROTECTION DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE
BOGOR AGRICULTURAL INSTITUTE
2020
 I. PENDAHULUAN
I.1 Latar Belakang
Kacang tanah adalah salah satu tanaman pangan yang dapat mempengaruhi system perekonomian
di Indonesia. Dalam budidaya kacang tanah sering mendapat serangan hama dan penyakit, sehingga
kehilangan hasil sangat besar.
Penyakit bercak daun merupakan salah satu penyakit utama pada kacang tanah, tersebar di seluruh
Negara-negara produksi kacang tanah, termasuk Indonesia. Di Indonesia penyakit telah tersebar luas ke
seluruh P. Jawa, Sumatera, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, bali, dan Lombok. Kehilangan hasil pada varietas-
varietas local dapat mencapai 50% (Semangun, 1991), sedangkan pada varietas unggul berkisar antara
12-22%.
Gejala tanaman yang terinfeksi cendawan bercak daun ditunjukkan oleh bercak kecil pada daun-
daun di bagian bawah, bercak kemudian melebar, dan bercak satu dengan lainnya menyatu sehingga
membentuk bercak besar, akhirnya daun mongering dan rontok. Penyakit umumnya terjadi pada fase
generative, dan serangan parah pada saat fase pengisian polong, sehingga petani sering beranggapan
bercak daun bukan suatu penyakit yang perlu dikendalikan, tetapi hanya suatu tanda bahwa tanaman
kacang tanah sudah waktunya dipanen. Umumnya varietas kacang tanah local rentan terhdap penyakit
bercak daun.
Penilaian ketahanan terhaddap penyakit bercak dan karat dilakukan dengan skor gejala penyakit
secara visual. Pengamatan gejala dengan skoring keparahan penyakit merupakan cara penilaian yang
terbaik karena heritabilitas ketahanan terhadap penyakit tinggi dan relative mudah dilakukan
(Pasupuleti et al. 2013).

Tujuan
Praktikum ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui cara mengukur insidensi dan severitas penyakit pada varietas
kacang tanah.
 II. MATERIAL AND METHODS
II.1 Alat dan Bahan
Alat yang diperlukan dalam praktikum ini diantaranya meteran, alat tulis menulis, alat dokumentasi.
Sedangkan bahan yang digunakan adalah tanaman kacang tanah.

II.2 Metode Praktikum

II.2.1 Pengambilan Sampel
Varietas kacang tanah, kantong plastik. Penyakit diukur dengan metode langsung, yaitu mengukur
penyakit pada tanaman. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan zona diagonal dengan mengambil 5 plot
pada lahan kacang tanah.

Gambar 1. Petak diagonal

II.2.2 Panduan untuk penilian penyakit bercak daun Cercospora

Gambar 2. Skoring Penilaian Bercak Daun Cercospora

II.2.3 Mengukur Insidensi Penyakit, Severitas Penyakit dan AUDPC

Insidensi penyakit (desease insidence atau frequency) atau sering disebut juga sebagai “Kejadian
Penyakit” merupakan proporsi individual inang atau organ yang terserang penyakit, tanpa
mempedulikan seberapa berat penyakitnya. Dalam persentase. Contoh tanaman yang terinfeksi (n) dan
tanaman yang diamati (N). Rumus sebagai berikut :
dimana:
n = jumlah tanaman yang bergejala penyakit
N = Total tanaman yang diamati
Severitas penyakit (Desease Severity) atau disebut keparahan penyakit yang merupakan proporsi
permukaan inang yang terinfeksi terhadap total permukaan inang yang diamati. Pengamatan keparahan
penyakit dapat ditentukan dengan dua cara in situ dan pengamatan organ secara destruktif. Insitu
merupakan pengamatan penyakit yang dapat diperkirakan secara visual langsung dari unit contoh
(misalkan daun). Skor pada setiap kategori serangan (v), dan skor untuk serangan terberat (V). Rumus
yang digunakan :

dimana:
n = jumlah tanaman yang bergejala penyakit
N = Total tanaman yang diamati
v = skor dari kategori penyakit tanaman
V = skor tertinggi yang digunakan dalam kategorisasi.
AUDPC ditentukan berdasarkan hasil pengamatan keparahan penyakit, dengan rumus:

II.2.4 Taksasi Kehilangan Hasil

Kehilangan hasil dihitung berdasarkan (1) data pengamatan individu tanaman dan (2) pengamatan
tingkat serangan yang berbeda. Hasil panen tanaman bergejala dan tanaman tidak bergejala diamati dan
diukur meliputi: jumlah umbi yang dihasilkan, bobot masing-masing umbi per tanaman, bobot total
umbi pertanaman dan kualitas umbi serta persentase kehilangan hasilnya pada akhir pengamatan.
Persentase kehilangan hasil menurut FAO (2001) dapat diperoleh dengan menggunakan rumus:

Hasil optimum = hasil yang diperoleh dalam keadaan tidak ada serangan patogen, hasil aktual = hasil
yang diperoleh pada saat ada serangan patogen dan sudah dilakukan langkah pengendalian.
II.2.5 Analisis Data
Data yang diperoleh dari hasil pengamatan tanaman di lapangan diuji dengan metode Rancangan
Acak Kelompok dan dilakukan uji lanjut dengan Uji Tukey. Analisis regresi korelasi digunakan untuk
mengevaluasi hubungan antara kehilangan hasil pada berbagai keparahan penyakit.
 III. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Tabel 1. Pengamatan Insidensi dan Severitas Penyakit Tanaman
Disease scoring
Plant Ke- observation
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5
% score % score % score % score % score
1 10 2 10 2 10 2 5 1 25 3
2 8 2 25 3 10 2 26 4 26 4
3 11 3 25 3 13 3 25 3 20 3
4 25 3 6 2 20 3 6 2 10 2
5 10 2 2 1 24 3 8 2 7 2
6 6 2 20 3 15 3 7 2 26 4
7 26 4 10 2 10 2 6 2 36 4
8 25 3 23 3 26 4 13 3 25 3
9 26 4 11 3 28 4 22 3 11 3
10 11 3 13 3 35 4 24 3 41 5
∑n x v 28 25 30 25 33
NxV 60 60 60 6 60
0
Disease 100 100 100 100 100
Incidence (%)
Disease 46,67 41,67 50 41,67 55
Severity(%)
Disease 52.5
severity
Average (%)
Sumber : Data Primer
Pada pengamatan ini didapatkan hasil dalam 10 kelompok kecil dalam satu kelas yang berbeda-beda
dari segi persentasenya. Hal tersebut dikarenakan besar penyebaran penyakit bercak daun di
permukaan daunnya berbeda-beda dan perhitungan yang dilakukan manual, menurut penglihatan dan
perkiraan kita. Praktikum ini menjelaskan pengukuran penyakit serta perhitungan intensitas penyakit
bercak pada tanaman kacang tanah. Seperti hasil table diatas yaitu table pengamatan severotas
penyakit Cercospora sp. Pada kacang tanah yang diamati adalah kerusakan penyakit pada tiap daun.
Bercak daun kacang tanah disebabkan oleh cercospora sp. Gejala yang tampak berupa bercak
berbentuk bulat pada kedua permukaan daun. Pada permukaan bagian atas bercak ini tampak berwarn
a coklat, sedangkan pada permukaan bawah tampak berwarna hitam. Insidensi penyakit mencapai 100%
tetapi severitas penyakit mencapai 52,5% dalam lahan yang mecapai kurang lebih 1 hektar.
Bercak tersebut umumnya berbentuk bulat dengan diameter 1-5 mm dan mempunyai bintik berwarna
kuning disekelilingnya. Hasil tersebut menunjukan keparahan penyakit yang hampir setengah dari
tingkat keparahan tertinggi sebesar 100%. Dengan demikian, kecermatan perkiraan menjadi pengaruh
terhadap hasil severitas keparahan penyakit. Penyakit bercak daun tersebar luas di tiap tempat kacang
tanah ditanam. Dari kegiatan pemuliaan untuk mendapatkan kacang tanah tahan penyakit bercak daun
yang telah dilakukan selama beberapa tahun, diketahui bahwa sifat tahan berasosiasi dengan daya hasil
rendah dan umur dalam (Norden et al., 1982).
Penyakit umumnya terjadi pada fase generative, dan serangan parah pada saat fase pengisian
polong, berdasarkan pengamatan petani sering beranggapan bercak daun bukan suatu penyakit yang
perlu dikendalikan, tetapi hanya suatu tanda bahwa tanaman kacang tanah sudah waktunya dipanen.
Umur tanaman saat diamati saat observasi lapang yaitu hampir 4 bulan. Varietas kacang tanah yang
ditanami oleh petani tidak menentu karena mereka menggunakan biji hasil panen bulan sebelumnya.
Tabel 2. Insidensi Penyakit Tanaman (%)
Kultivar Rata-Rata Insidensi Penyakit Tanaman (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CVA 16a 28.5a 32.5a 36a 39a 49a 79b 72.5a 83a 91b
CVB 17a 26.5a 33.5a 39.5a 43.5a 46a 55a 57a 62.5a 68.5a
CVC 15.5a 22a 29.5a 40a 42.5a 48a 56.5a 60a 61.5a 63.5a
Sumber : Data Sekunder
Berdasarkan pengamatan Insidensi Penyakit Tanaman, Cultivar A menunjukkan berbeda nyata
dengan cultivar B dan Cultivar C pada pengamatan 7 dan 10 yaitu sebesar 79% dan 91%.
Tabel 3. Severitas Penyakit Tanaman (%)
Kultivar Rata-Rata Severitas Penyakit Tanaman (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
CVA 2.25a 5.25a 7.69a 13.25b 15.38a 19.88b 29.38b 33.25b 41.63b 50.06b
CVB 2.19a 4.44a 6.94a 10.56ab 13.25a 14.63a 17.38a 21.63a 26.06a 28.00a
CVC 2.25a 3.94a 6.44a 9.94a 12.56a 15.06a 17.81a 22.38a 24.44a 29.75a
Sumber : Data Sekunder
Menurut skor keparahan penyakit, dalam satu kelas praktikum severitas yang terbesar diamati oleh
kelompok 9 dan 10, dimana severitas penyakit sebesar 50.6% pada cultivar A, 28% pada kultivar B dan
29,75% pada cultivar C. Rata-rata severitas penyakit yang didapatkan dari 10 pengamatan praktikum
dapat dilihat pada tabel 3, hasil tersebut menunjukan keparahan penyakit yang hampir setengah dari
tingkat keparahan tertinggi sebesar 50,06%. Dengan demikian, kecermatan perkiraan menjadi pengaruh
terhadap hasil severitas keparahan penyakit.
 Pada pengamatan di atas, diagram menunjukkan tingkat keparahan penyakit dan kejadian penyakit
sedangkan bagian grafik menunjukkan AUDPC. Keparahan penyakit selama 10 kali pengamatan
menunjukkan semakin tinggi sehingga berdampak pada nilai AUDPC yang tinggi. Keparahan Penyakit (%)
mengindikasikan bahwa nilai AUDPC berkorelasi positif dengan keparahan penyakit. Keparahan penyakit
tertinggi pada akhir pengamatan menunjukkan sebesar 50% dan kejadian penyakit menunjukkan
sebesar 90%. Insidensi penyakit akan berkaitan dengan tingkat kehilangan hasil panen kacang tanah. Jika
insidensi penyakit dan keparahan penyakit tinggi maka hasil panen semakin menurun.
Tabel 4. Persentase Kehilangan Hasil Akibat Infeksi Penyakit Bercak Daun Kacang Tanah pada 3 Jenis
Kultivar yang Berbeda
Kultivar Hasil Optimum Konversi Hasil AUDPC KP Kehilangan Hasil
(ton/ha) Aktual (ton/ha) (%)
CVA 2120 1386.825 191.84 52.867
CVB 1926 1463.450 129.97 31.607
CVC 1880 1359.775 128.56 38.258
Berdasarkan perhitungan hasil panen dari 3 kultivar kacang tanah yang sehat dan bergejala bercak
daun yang diamati secara individu menunjukkan bahwa hasil optimum tertinggi terdapat pada cultivar A
yaitu sebanyak 2120 ton/ha. Sedangkan hasil konversi hasil actual tertinggi pada cultivar B yaitu
sebanyak 1463.450 ton/ha. Dilihat dari sisi kehilangan hasil, cultivar A menjadi kultivar yang mengalami
kehilangan hasil tertinggi dibandingkan dengan Cultivar B dan Cultivar C yaitu sebesar 52,867 %.
 IV. CONCLUSION
Berdasarkan praktikum tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa:
1. Pengamatan di lahan, Insidensi penyakit mencapai 100% tetapi severitas penyakit mencapai 52,5%
dalam lahan yang mecapai kurang lebih 1 hektar.
2. Severitas yang terbesar diamati oleh kelompok 9 dan 10, dimana severitas penyakit sebesar 50.6%
pada cultivar A, 28% pada kultivar B dan 29,75% pada cultivar C. Sedangkan, Berdasarkan
pengamatan Insidensi Penyakit Tanaman, Cultivar A menunjukkan berbeda nyata dengan cultivar B
dan Cultivar C pada pengamatan 7 dan 10 yaitu sebesar 79% dan 91%.
3. Keparahan penyakit selama 10 kali pengamatan menunjukkan semakin tinggi sehingga berdampak
pada nilai AUDPC yang tinggi.
4. Dilihat dari sisi kehilangan hasil, cultivar A menjadi kultivar yang mengalami kehilangan hasil
tertinggi dibandingkan dengan Cultivar B dan Cultivar C yaitu sebesar 52,867 %.

REFERENCES
Semangun, H., 1991. Penyakit-Penyakit Tanaman Pangan di Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press,
Yogyakarta. Hal 42- 48
Pathan, R.K., P.R. Gali, P. Pathan, T.Gowtham & S. Pasupuleti. (2013). “In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of
Citrus aurantifolia (Christm. & Panz.). Swingle Andids Phytochemical Screening.” Asian Pacific
Journal of Tropical Disease, 5328‒5331.
FAO News Highlight. (2001). Street Foods Arounds the World. Retrieved from
http://www.fao.org/news/2001/010804-e.htm.
 LAMPIRAN

Gambar Observasi Lahan

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10

Gambar Gejala Tanaman Grup 1

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10

Gambar Gejala Tanaman Grup 2

 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10

Gambar Gejala Tanaman Grup 3

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10

Gambar Gejala Tanaman Grup 4

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10

Gambar Gejala Tanaman Grup 5

 a b

Gambar a. Gejala Pada Permukaan Atas, b.Gejala Pada Permukaan Bawah

OLAHAN DATA MENGGUNAKAN MINITAB

Tabel Severitas Penyakit tanaman (%)
No. Cultivars Block Disease Severity (%) from observation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 CVA 1 2.50 6.00 9.00 16.00 18.50 22.75 33.00 36.75 47.75 51.50
2 3.00 5.50 8.75 13.00 17.25 20.25 29.00 30.75 40.00 44.75
3 1.75 4.75 6.25 12.50 13.00 19.50 31.25 35.25 43.00 54.00
4 1.75 4.75 6.75 11.50 12.75 17.00 24.25 30.25 35.75 50.00
2 CVB 1 2.75 5.25 8.00 12.25 16.50 17.75 20.75 24.00 29.00 28.75
2 1.00 2.50 5.25 7.75 8.75 11.25 13.25 17.25 19.75 21.00
3 2.50 4.75 7.50 11.25 14.25 15.75 19.00 25.25 31.00 32.50
4 2.50 5.25 7.00 11.00 13.50 13.75 16.50 20.00 24.50 29.75
3 CVC 1 2.50 4.25 7.25 11.00 14.75 16.00 12.75 17.50 18.50 25.25
2 1.00 2.25 4.75 7.00 8.50 11.25 20.50 25.25 27.25 33.00
3 2.75 5.00 7.50 11.00 13.50 17.75 17.50 24.00 25.00 30.50
4 2.75 4.25 6.25 10.75 13.50 15.25 20.50 22.75 27.00 30.25

Tabel Insidensi Penyakit Tanaman

No. Cultivars Block Disease Incidence (%) from observation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 CVA 1 18.00 32.00 40.00 46.00 50.00 60.00 88.00 86.00 96.00 98.00
2 20.00 30.00 32.00 32.00 42.00 44.00 76.00 64.00 74.00 74.00
3 14.00 30.00 30.00 34.00 30.00 48.00 84.00 78.00 82.00 100.00
4 12.00 22.00 28.00 32.00 34.00 44.00 68.00 62.00 80.00 92.00
2 CVB 1 20.00 30.00 34.00 40.00 52.00 52.00 62.00 62.00 68.00 68.00
2 8.00 16.00 32.00 40.00 40.00 52.00 62.00 64.00 68.00 68.00
3 20.00 30.00 38.00 46.00 46.00 46.00 54.00 58.00 66.00 70.00
4 20.00 30.00 30.00 32.00 36.00 34.00 42.00 44.00 48.00 68.00
3 CVC 1 20.00 28.00 40.00 44.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00
2 8.00 18.00 32.00 38.00 38.00 50.00 56.00 64.00 64.00 64.00
3 14.00 20.00 22.00 38.00 38.00 46.00 52.00 56.00 62.00 62.00
 4 20.00 22.00 24.00 40.00 42.00 44.00 66.00 68.00 68.00 76.00

Tabel AUDPS Severitas Penyakit Tanaman

No. Cultivars Block Disease severity-based AUDPC value per observation AUDPC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 CVA 1 nd 4.25 7.50 12.50 17.25 20.63 27.88 34.88 42.25 49.63 216.75
2 nd 4.25 7.13 10.88 15.13 18.75 24.63 29.88 35.38 42.38 188.38
3 nd 3.25 5.50 9.38 12.75 16.25 25.38 33.25 39.13 48.50 193.38
4 nd 3.25 5.75 9.13 12.13 14.88 20.63 27.25 33.00 42.88 168.88
2 CVB 1 nd 4.00 6.63 10.13 14.38 17.13 19.25 22.38 26.50 28.88 149.25
2 nd 1.75 3.88 6.50 8.25 10.00 12.25 15.25 18.50 20.38 96.75
3 nd 3.63 6.13 9.38 12.75 15.00 17.38 22.13 28.13 31.75 146.25
4 nd 3.88 6.13 9.00 12.25 13.63 15.13 18.25 22.25 27.13 127.63
3 CVC 1 nd 3.38 5.75 9.13 12.88 15.38 14.38 15.13 18.00 21.88 115.88
2 nd 1.63 3.50 5.88 7.75 9.88 15.88 22.88 26.25 30.13 123.75
3 nd 3.88 6.25 9.25 12.25 15.63 17.63 20.75 24.50 27.75 137.88
4 nd 3.50 5.25 8.50 12.13 14.38 17.88 21.63 24.88 28.63 136.75

Tabel AUDPS Insidensi Penyakit Tanaman

No. Cultivars Block Disease incidense-based AUDPC value per observation AUDPC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 CVA 1 nd 25.00 36.00 43.00 48.00 55.00 74.00 87.00 91.00 97.00 556.00
2 nd 25.00 31.00 32.00 37.00 43.00 60.00 70.00 69.00 74.00 441.00
3 nd 22.00 30.00 32.00 32.00 39.00 66.00 81.00 80.00 91.00 473.00
4 nd 17.00 25.00 30.00 33.00 39.00 56.00 65.00 71.00 86.00 422.00
2 CVB 1 nd 25.00 32.00 37.00 46.00 52.00 57.00 62.00 65.00 68.00 444.00
2 nd 12.00 24.00 36.00 40.00 46.00 57.00 63.00 66.00 68.00 412.00
3 nd 25.00 34.00 42.00 46.00 46.00 50.00 56.00 62.00 68.00 429.00
4 nd 25.00 30.00 31.00 34.00 35.00 38.00 43.00 46.00 58.00 340.00
3 CVC 1 nd 24.00 34.00 42.00 48.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 408.00
2 nd 13.00 25.00 35.00 38.00 44.00 53.00 60.00 64.00 64.00 396.00
3 nd 17.00 21.00 30.00 38.00 42.00 49.00 54.00 59.00 62.00 372.00
4 nd 21.00 23.00 32.00 41.00 43.00 55.00 67.00 68.00 72.00 422.00

Severitas Penyakit pada Tanaman Kacang Tanah

Pengamatan 1
General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block
Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

 Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 0.01042 0.005208 0.01 0.992
Block 3 1.39063 0.463542 0.74 0.568
Error 6 3.78125 0.630208
Total 11 5.18229
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

0.793857 27.04% 0.00% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 2.229 0.229 9.73 0.000
Cultivar
1 0.021 0.324 0.06 0.951 1.33
2 -0.042 0.324 -0.13 0.902 1.33
Block
1 0.354 0.397 0.89 0.407 1.50
2 -0.562 0.397 -1.42 0.206 1.50
3 0.104 0.397 0.26 0.802 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 2.229 + 0.021 Cultivar_1 - 0.042 Cultivar_2 + 0.021 Cultivar_3
+ 0.354 Block_1 - 0.562 Block_2 + 0.104 Block_3 + 0.104 Block_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Severity Std
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Resid
2 3.000 1.688 1.313 2.34 R
R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 2.2500 A
 3 4 2.2500 A
2 4 2.1875 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

1 3 2.58333 A
3 3 2.33333 A
4 3 2.33333 A
2 3 1.66667 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 2

General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 3.510 1.7552 2.06 0.209
Block 3 5.354 1.7847 2.09 0.203
Error 6 5.115 0.8524
Total 11 13.979
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

0.923272 63.41% 32.92% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 4.542 0.267 17.04 0.000
Cultivar
1 0.708 0.377 1.88 0.109 1.33
2 -0.104 0.377 -0.28 0.792 1.33
 Block
1 0.625 0.462 1.35 0.225 1.50
2 -1.125 0.462 -2.44 0.051 1.50
3 0.292 0.462 0.63 0.551 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 4.542 + 0.708 Cultivar_1 - 0.104 Cultivar_2 - 0.604 Cultivar_3
+ 0.625 Block_1 - 1.125 Block_2 + 0.292 Block_3 + 0.208 Block_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Severity Std
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Resid
2 5.500 4.125 1.375 2.11 R
R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 5.2500 A
2 4 4.4375 A
3 4 3.9375 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

1 3 5.16667 A
3 3 4.83333 A
4 3 4.75000 A
2 3 3.41667 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Pengamatan 3

General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

 Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 3.167 1.583 1.03 0.412
Block 3 5.557 1.852 1.21 0.385
Error 6 9.208 1.535
Total 11 17.932
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

1.23884 48.65% 5.86% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 7.021 0.358 19.63 0.000
Cultivar
1 0.667 0.506 1.32 0.236 1.33
2 -0.083 0.506 -0.16 0.875 1.33
Block
1 1.062 0.619 1.72 0.137 1.50
2 -0.771 0.619 -1.24 0.260 1.50
3 0.062 0.619 0.10 0.923 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 7.021 + 0.667 Cultivar_1 - 0.083 Cultivar_2 - 0.583 Cultivar_3
+ 1.062 Block_1 - 0.771 Block_2 + 0.062 Block_3 - 0.354 Block_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Severity Std
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Resid
2 8.750 6.917 1.833 2.09 R
R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 7.6875 A
 2 4 6.9375 A
3 4 6.4375 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

1 3 8.08333 A
3 3 7.08333 A
4 3 6.66667 A
2 3 6.25000 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 4

General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 24.78 12.391 6.34 0.033
Block 3 22.50 7.500 3.84 0.076
Error 6 11.72 1.953
Total 11 59.00
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

1.39754 80.14% 63.59% 20.55%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 11.250 0.403 27.89 0.000
Cultivar
1 2.000 0.571 3.51 0.013 1.33
2 -0.688 0.571 -1.20 0.274 1.33
 Block
1 1.833 0.699 2.62 0.039 1.50
2 -2.000 0.699 -2.86 0.029 1.50
3 0.333 0.699 0.48 0.650 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 11.250 + 2.000 Cultivar_1 - 0.688 Cultivar_2 - 1.313 Cultivar_3
+ 1.833 Block_1 - 2.000 Block_2 + 0.333 Block_3 - 0.167 Block_4
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 13.2500 A
2 4 10.5625 A B
3 4 9.9375 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

1 3 13.0833 A
3 3 11.5833 A
4 3 11.0833 A
2 3 9.2500 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Pengamatan 5

General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 17.20 8.599 1.27 0.347
 Block 3 40.10 13.366 1.97 0.219
Error 6 40.64 6.773
Total 11 97.93
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

2.60242 58.51% 23.93% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 13.729 0.751 18.28 0.000
Cultivar
1 1.65 1.06 1.55 0.172 1.33
2 -0.48 1.06 -0.45 0.668 1.33
Block
1 2.85 1.30 2.19 0.071 1.50
2 -2.23 1.30 -1.71 0.138 1.50
3 -0.15 1.30 -0.11 0.914 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 13.729 + 1.65 Cultivar_1 - 0.48 Cultivar_2 - 1.17 Cultivar_3
+ 2.85 Block_1 - 2.23 Block_2 - 0.15 Block_3 - 0.48 Block_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Severity Std
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Resid
2 17.25 13.15 4.10 2.23 R
R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 15.3750 A
2 4 13.2500 A
3 4 12.5625 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

 1 3 16.5833 A
3 3 13.5833 A
4 3 13.2500 A
2 3 11.5000 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 6

General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 67.89 33.943 8.86 0.016
Block 3 39.68 13.227 3.45 0.092
Error 6 22.99 3.832
Total 11 130.56
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

1.95745 82.39% 67.72% 29.56%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 16.521 0.565 29.24 0.000
Cultivar
1 3.354 0.799 4.20 0.006 1.33
2 -1.896 0.799 -2.37 0.055 1.33
Block
1 2.312 0.979 2.36 0.056 1.50
2 -2.271 0.979 -2.32 0.059 1.50
3 1.146 0.979 1.17 0.286 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 16.521 + 3.354 Cultivar_1 - 1.896 Cultivar_2 - 1.458 Cultivar_3
 + 2.312 Block_1 - 2.271 Block_2 + 1.146 Block_3 - 1.188 Block_4
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 19.8750 A
3 4 15.0625 B
2 4 14.6250 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

1 3 18.8333 A
3 3 17.6667 A
4 3 15.3333 A
2 3 14.2500 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 7
General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block
Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 370.510 185.255 10.52 0.011
Block 3 9.391 3.130 0.18 0.908
Error 6 105.656 17.609
Total 11 485.557
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

4.19635 78.24% 60.11% 12.96%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

 Constant 21.52 1.21 17.77 0.000
Cultivar
1 7.85 1.71 4.58 0.004 1.33
2 -4.15 1.71 -2.42 0.052 1.33
Block
1 0.65 2.10 0.31 0.769 1.50
2 -0.60 2.10 -0.29 0.783 1.50
3 1.06 2.10 0.51 0.631 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 21.52 + 7.85 Cultivar_1 - 4.15 Cultivar_2 - 3.71 Cultivar_3
+ 0.65 Block_1 - 0.60 Block_2 + 1.06 Block_3 - 1.10 Block_4
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 29.3750 A
3 4 17.8125 B
2 4 17.3750 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

3 3 22.5833 A
1 3 22.1667 A
2 3 20.9167 A
4 3 20.4167 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
 Pengamatan 8

General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 338.63 169.313 13.08 0.006
Block 3 29.21 9.736 0.75 0.560
Error 6 77.67 12.944
Total 11 445.50
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

3.59784 82.57% 68.04% 30.27%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 25.75 1.04 24.79 0.000
Cultivar
1 7.50 1.47 5.11 0.002 1.33
2 -4.13 1.47 -2.81 0.031 1.33
Block
1 0.33 1.80 0.19 0.859 1.50
2 -1.33 1.80 -0.74 0.487 1.50
3 2.42 1.80 1.34 0.228 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 25.75 + 7.50 Cultivar_1 - 4.13 Cultivar_2 - 3.38 Cultivar_3
+ 0.33 Block_1 - 1.33 Block_2 + 2.42 Block_3 - 1.42 Block_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Severity
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Std Resid
9 17.50 22.71 -5.21 -2.05 R
 R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 33.250 A
3 4 22.375 B
2 4 21.625 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

3 3 28.1667 A
1 3 26.0833 A
2 3 24.4167 A
4 3 24.3333 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 9
General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block
Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 720.32 360.16 13.00 0.007
Block 3 35.69 11.90 0.43 0.739
Error 6 166.22 27.70
Total 11 922.23
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

5.26338 81.98% 66.96% 27.91%
 Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 30.71 1.52 20.21 0.000
Cultivar
1 10.92 2.15 5.08 0.002 1.33
2 -4.65 2.15 -2.16 0.074 1.33
Block
1 1.04 2.63 0.40 0.706 1.50
2 -1.71 2.63 -0.65 0.540 1.50
3 2.29 2.63 0.87 0.417 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 30.71 + 10.92 Cultivar_1 - 4.65 Cultivar_2 - 6.27 Cultivar_3
+ 1.04 Block_1 - 1.71 Block_2 + 2.29 Block_3 - 1.63 Block_4

Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 41.6250 A
2 4 26.0625 B
3 4 24.4375 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

3 3 33.0000 A
1 3 31.7500 A
4 3 29.0833 A
2 3 29.0000 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
 Pengamatan 10
General Linear Model: Disease Severity (10%) versus Cultivar, Block
Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Block Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 1203.22 601.61 39.49 0.000
Block 3 58.89 19.63 1.29 0.361
Error 6 91.41 15.23
Total 11 1353.52
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

3.90312 93.25% 87.62% 72.99%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 35.94 1.13 31.90 0.000
Cultivar
1 14.13 1.59 8.86 0.000 1.33
2 -7.94 1.59 -4.98 0.002 1.33
Block
1 -0.77 1.95 -0.39 0.707 1.50
2 -3.02 1.95 -1.55 0.173 1.50
3 3.06 1.95 1.57 0.168 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 35.94 + 14.13 Cultivar_1 - 7.94 Cultivar_2 - 6.19 Cultivar_3
- 0.77 Block_1 - 3.02 Block_2 + 3.06 Block_3 + 0.73 Block_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Severity Std
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Resid
10 33.00 26.73 6.27 2.27 R
 R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Severity (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 50.0625 A
3 4 29.7500 B
2 4 28.0000 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Block
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Block N Mean Grouping

3 3 39.0000 A
4 3 36.6667 A
1 3 35.1667 A
2 3 32.9167 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Insidensi Penyakit pada Tanaman kacang Tanah

Pengamatan 1

General Linear Model: Disease Incidence (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 4.667 2.333 0.09 0.918
blok 3 86.333 28.778 1.07 0.428
Error 6 160.667 26.778
Total 11 251.667
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

 5.17472 36.16% 0.00% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 16.17 1.49 10.82 0.000
Cultivar
1 -0.17 2.11 -0.08 0.940 1.33
2 0.83 2.11 0.39 0.707 1.33
blok
1 3.17 2.59 1.22 0.267 1.50
2 -4.17 2.59 -1.61 0.158 1.50
3 -0.17 2.59 -0.06 0.951 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 16.17 - 0.17 Cultivar_1 + 0.83 Cultivar_2 - 0.67 Cultivar_3
+ 3.17 blok_1 - 4.17 blok_2 - 0.17 blok_3 + 1.17 blok_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Severity Std
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Resid
2 20.00 11.83 8.17 2.23 R
R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Incidence (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

2 4 17.0 A
1 4 16.0 A
3 4 15.5 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 19.3333 A
4 3 17.3333 A
3 3 16.0000 A
2 3 12.0000 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
 Pengamatan 2

General Linear Model: Disease Incidence (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 88.67 44.33 1.86 0.236
blok 3 118.67 39.56 1.66 0.274
Error 6 143.33 23.89
Total 11 350.67
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

4.88763 59.13% 25.06% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 25.67 1.41 18.19 0.000
Cultivar
1 2.83 2.00 1.42 0.205 1.33
2 0.83 2.00 0.42 0.691 1.33
blok
1 4.33 2.44 1.77 0.127 1.50
2 -4.33 2.44 -1.77 0.127 1.50
3 1.00 2.44 0.41 0.697 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Severity (10%) = 25.67 + 2.83 Cultivar_1 + 0.83 Cultivar_2 - 3.67 Cultivar_3
+ 4.33 blok_1 - 4.33 blok_2 + 1.00 blok_3 - 1.00 blok_4
 Comparisons for Disease Incidence (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 28.5 A
2 4 26.5 A
3 4 22.0 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 30.0000 A
3 3 26.6667 A
4 3 24.6667 A
2 3 21.3333 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 3

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 34.67 17.33 0.76 0.506
blok 3 185.00 61.67 2.72 0.137
Error 6 136.00 22.67
Total 11 355.67
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

4.76095 61.76% 29.90% 0.00%
 Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 31.83 1.37 23.16 0.000
Cultivar
1 0.67 1.94 0.34 0.743 1.33
2 1.67 1.94 0.86 0.424 1.33
blok
1 6.17 2.38 2.59 0.041 1.50
2 0.17 2.38 0.07 0.946 1.50
3 -1.83 2.38 -0.77 0.470 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 31.83 + 0.67 Cultivar_1 + 1.67 Cultivar_2 - 2.33 Cultivar_3
+ 6.17 blok_1 + 0.17 blok_2 - 1.83 blok_3 - 4.50 blok_4
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

2 4 33.5 A
1 4 32.5 A
3 4 29.5 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 38.0000 A
2 3 32.0000 A
3 3 30.0000 A
4 3 27.3333 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
 Pengamatan 4

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 38.00 19.00 0.86 0.470
blok 3 126.33 42.11 1.90 0.230
Error 6 132.67 22.11
Total 11 297.00
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

4.70225 55.33% 18.11% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 38.50 1.36 28.36 0.000
Cultivar
1 -2.50 1.92 -1.30 0.241 1.33
2 1.00 1.92 0.52 0.621 1.33
blok
1 4.83 2.35 2.06 0.086 1.50
2 -1.83 2.35 -0.78 0.465 1.50
3 0.83 2.35 0.35 0.735 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 38.50 - 2.50 Cultivar_1 + 1.00 Cultivar_2 + 1.50 Cultivar_3
+ 4.83 blok_1 - 1.83 blok_2 + 0.83 blok_3 - 3.83 blok_4
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

3 4 40.0 A
 2 4 39.5 A
1 4 36.0 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 43.3333 A
3 3 39.3333 A
2 3 36.6667 A
4 3 34.6667 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 5

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 44.67 22.33 1.04 0.409
blok 3 385.33 128.44 5.99 0.031
Error 6 128.67 21.44
Total 11 558.67
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

4.63081 76.97% 57.78% 7.88%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 41.67 1.34 31.17 0.000
Cultivar
1 -2.67 1.89 -1.41 0.208 1.33
2 1.83 1.89 0.97 0.370 1.33
 blok
1 9.67 2.32 4.17 0.006 1.50
2 -1.67 2.32 -0.72 0.499 1.50
3 -3.67 2.32 -1.58 0.164 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 41.67 - 2.67 Cultivar_1 + 1.83 Cultivar_2 + 0.83 Cultivar_3
+ 9.67 blok_1 - 1.67 blok_2 - 3.67 blok_3 - 4.33 blok_4
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

2 4 43.5 A
3 4 42.5 A
1 4 39.0 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 51.3333 A
2 3 40.0000 A B
3 3 38.0000 B
4 3 37.3333 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
 Pengamatan 6

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 18.67 9.333 0.44 0.665
blok 3 300.00 100.000 4.69 0.051
Error 6 128.00 21.333
Total 11 446.67
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

4.61880 71.34% 47.46% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 47.67 1.33 35.75 0.000
Cultivar
1 1.33 1.89 0.71 0.506 1.33
2 -1.67 1.89 -0.88 0.411 1.33
blok
1 7.00 2.31 3.03 0.023 1.50
2 1.00 2.31 0.43 0.680 1.50
3 -1.00 2.31 -0.43 0.680 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 47.67 + 1.33 Cultivar_1 - 1.67 Cultivar_2 + 0.33 Cultivar_3
+ 7.00 blok_1 + 1.00 blok_2 - 1.00 blok_3 - 7.00 blok_4
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 49 A
 3 4 48 A
2 4 46 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 54.6667 A
2 3 48.6667 A B
3 3 46.6667 A B
4 3 40.6667 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 7

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 1446.0 723.00 8.40 0.018
blok 3 118.3 39.44 0.46 0.722
Error 6 516.7 86.11
Total 11 2081.0
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

9.27961 75.17% 54.48% 0.69%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 63.50 2.68 23.70 0.000
Cultivar
1 15.50 3.79 4.09 0.006 1.33
2 -8.50 3.79 -2.24 0.066 1.33
 blok
1 3.83 4.64 0.83 0.440 1.50
2 1.17 4.64 0.25 0.810 1.50
3 -0.17 4.64 -0.04 0.973 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 63.50 + 15.50 Cultivar_1 - 8.50 Cultivar_2 - 7.00 Cultivar_3
+ 3.83 blok_1 + 1.17 blok_2 - 0.17 blok_3 - 4.83 blok_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations

Disease
Insidensi Std
Obs (10%) Fit Resid Resid
12 66.00 51.67 14.33 2.18 R
R Large residual
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 79.0 A
3 4 56.5 B
2 4 55.0 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 67.3333 A
2 3 64.6667 A
3 3 63.3333 A
4 3 58.6667 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
 Pengamatan 8

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 540.7 270.33 2.39 0.172
blok 3 121.0 40.33 0.36 0.786
Error 6 678.0 113.00
Total 11 1339.7
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

10.6301 49.39% 7.22% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 63.17 3.07 20.58 0.000
Cultivar
1 9.33 4.34 2.15 0.075 1.33
2 -6.17 4.34 -1.42 0.205 1.33
blok
1 3.50 5.32 0.66 0.535 1.50
2 0.83 5.32 0.16 0.881 1.50
3 0.83 5.32 0.16 0.881 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 63.17 + 9.33 Cultivar_1 - 6.17 Cultivar_2 - 3.17 Cultivar_3
+ 3.50 blok_1 + 0.83 blok_2 + 0.83 blok_3 - 5.17 blok_4
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 72.5 A
 3 4 60.0 A
2 4 57.0 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 66.6667 A
2 3 64.0000 A
3 3 64.0000 A
4 3 58.0000 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 9

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 1178.00 589.00 5.78 0.040
blok 3 70.67 23.56 0.23 0.872
Error 6 611.33 101.89
Total 11 1860.00
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

10.0940 67.13% 39.74% 0.00%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 69.00 2.91 23.68 0.000
Cultivar
1 14.00 4.12 3.40 0.015 1.33
2 -6.50 4.12 -1.58 0.166 1.33
 blok
1 3.00 5.05 0.59 0.574 1.50
2 -0.33 5.05 -0.07 0.949 1.50
3 1.00 5.05 0.20 0.849 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 69.00 + 14.00 Cultivar_1 - 6.50 Cultivar_2 - 7.50 Cultivar_3
+ 3.00 blok_1 - 0.33 blok_2 + 1.00 blok_3 - 3.67 blok_4
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 83.0 A
2 4 62.5 A
3 4 61.5 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

1 3 72.0000 A
3 3 70.0000 A
2 3 68.6667 A
4 3 65.3333 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Pengamatan 10

General Linear Model: Disease Insidensi (10%) versus Cultivar, blok

Method

Factor coding (-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor Type Levels Values

Cultivar Fixed 3 1, 2, 3
blok Fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4
Analysis of Variance

Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value

Cultivar 2 1716.7 858.33 9.79 0.013
blok 3 188.0 62.67 0.71 0.578
 Error 6 526.0 87.67
Total 11 2430.7
Model Summary

S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)

9.36305 78.36% 60.33% 13.44%
Coefficients

Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF

Constant 74.33 2.70 27.50 0.000
Cultivar
1 16.67 3.82 4.36 0.005 1.33
2 -5.83 3.82 -1.53 0.178 1.33
blok
1 -1.67 4.68 -0.36 0.734 1.50
2 -5.67 4.68 -1.21 0.272 1.50
3 3.00 4.68 0.64 0.545 1.50
Regression Equation

Disease Insidensi (10%) = 74.33 + 16.67 Cultivar_1 - 5.83 Cultivar_2 - 10.83 Cultivar_3
- 1.67 blok_1 - 5.67 blok_2 + 3.00 blok_3 + 4.33 blok_4
Comparisons for Disease Insidensi (10%)
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: Cultivar
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

Cultivar N Mean Grouping

1 4 91.0 A
2 4 68.5 B
3 4 63.5 B
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Tukey Pairwise Comparisons: blok
Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence

blok N Mean Grouping

4 3 78.6667 A
3 3 77.3333 A
1 3 72.6667 A
2 3 68.6667 A
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.