Oleh:
Achmad Ibnu Gozali (22522307)
Asisten Pembimbing:
Farhan Aji Pradana(M-107)
METODOLOGI Pada penelitian ini, desain untuk manufaktur pemesinan (Design For
Manufacture Machining) mengacu kepada metode Boothroyd
1. Perangkat lunak (Software) digunakan untuk implementasi
metodologi yang dapat mengidentifikasi logika dari metodologi
secara mudah dan cepat. Perangkat lunak digunakan sebagai
alat untuk menguraikan metodologi dan juga sebagai alat
komunikasi dari pengembang (pembuat desain) kepada
pengguna.
2. Penelitian ini menggunakan bahasa pemrograman Visual Basic
(VB) dan VRML97 untuk mengembangkan metodologi user-
friendly (mudah digunakan). VB bahasa program yang mampu
sebagai alat yang memfasilitasi pengembangan metode dan
HASIL DAN aktifitas lain.
PEMBAHASAAN 3. Pemilihan perangkat lunak dilakukan untuk mendukung
implementasi dari tujuan dan untuk memuaskan keinginan
untuk menggunakan perangkat lunak komersial yang ter-sedia.
Sebagai titik awal, VB digunakan sebagai bahasa program
untuk membuat interface (antar muka) antara Microsoft Access
databases dan Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. Microsoft Access
menawarkan banyak kelengkapan imporkonversi dari bentuk
data format lain seperti dBase, SQL, FoxPro, dan Paradox.
Kemampuan SQL (Structured
Oleh:
Mumtaz Fahd Rifmawan M.s 225222307
Asisten Pembimbing:
Farhan Aji Pradana (M-107)
TAHUN 2014
OBJEK desain produk yang sesuai dengan permintaan atau kebutuhan nasabah,
bentuk desain yang sesuai visi, misi dan tujuan lembaga keuangan mikro
syariah, keempat; pengujian produk yang layak digunakan oleh nasabah,
kelima; melaksanakan komersialisasi dengan pengelolaan risiko operasional
dan manajemen resiko
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Kotler, Philip. 2000. Marketing Managemen. New Jersey Prentice Hall. Moekijat. 1990. Kamus
Manajemen. Bandung: Mandar Maju Muhammad, 2002. Lembaga-Lembaga Keuangan Umat
Kontemporer. UII Press: Yogyakarta. Muhammad. 2002. Manajemen Pembiyaan Bank Syariah.
Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN Norman A. Hart dan John Staplenton. 2005. Kamus Marketing. Jakarta:
PT Bumi Aksara. Rendra, Bhirawa. 2011. Dampak Pembiayaan Sektor Pertanian oleh Lembaga
Pembiayaan Syariah Terhadap Tingkat Kesejahteraan Para Petani (Studi Kasus Kecamata torjun,
kabupaten Sampang), http:// www.google. com. Diakses tanggal 1 Juni 2014 Ridwan, M. 2005.
Manajemen Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil (BMT). Yogyakarta: UII Press. Sondang P. Siagian. 2007.
Manajemen Strategik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung:
Alfabeta
REVIEW JURNAL
INHAL PEMBEKALAN UMUM TUTORIAL
DASAR PERANCANGAN TEKNIK INDUSTRI
Oleh:
Mumtaz Fahd Rifmawan M.s (22522307)
Asisten Pembimbing:
Farhan Aji Pradana (M-107)
TAHUN 2012
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
DOC (Department of Commerce), 2008. How does Commerce Define Sustainable Manufacturing? http://www.trade.gov/competitiveness/
sustainablemanufacturing/how doc defines SM.asp. Dreyer, L.C., Hauschild, M., Schierbeck, J., 2006. A framework for social li fe cycle impact
assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11 (2), 88–97. EEA (European Environmental Agency) CSI, 2005. EEA Core Set of Indicators, EEA Technical
Report No. 1/2005. EPfI (Environmental Performance Indicators), 2010. 2010 Environmental Performance Indicators, Yale Center for
Environmental Law & Policy/Center for International Earth Science Information Network In Collaboration with World Economic Fo rum/Joint
Research Centre of the European Commission, http://epi.yale.edu/file columns/0000/0008/epi-2010.pdf. ESI (Environmental Sustainability
Indicators), 2005. 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship, Yale Center for
Environmental Law and Policy/Center for International Earth Science Information Network, http://www.yale.edu/esi/ESI2005.pdf. EPrI, 1999.
Towards Environmental Pressure Indicators for the EU, Environment and Energy Paper Theme 8, Luxembourg, European Commission,
http://biogov.cpdr.ucl.ac.be/communication/papers/tepi99rp EN105.pdf. Feng, S., Joung, C., 2009. An overview of proposed measurement
infrastructure for sustainable manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Sustainable Engineering, December 2–4,
Chennai, India. Feng, S., Joung, C., 2010. Development overview of sustainable manufacturing metrics. In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP
International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, May 19–21, Hefei, China. Gaurav, A., Rachuri, S., Fiorentini, X., Mani, M., Fenves, S.,
Lyons, K., Sriram, R., 2008. Extending the Notion of Quality from Physical Metrology to Information and Sustainability, NISTIR 7517. The
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland. GRI (Global Reporting Initiative), 2006. Sustainabili ty Reporting
Guidelines, Version 3.0, 200-2006 GRI, http://www.globalreporting.org. Heink, U., Kowarik, I., 2010. What are indicators? On the definition
of indicators in ecology and environmental planning. Ecol. Indic. 10, 584–593. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 1999.
Environmental Management-Environmental Performance Evaluation-Guidelines, ISO 14031:1999(E), Geneva, Switzerland. Japan Science and
Technology Agency, 1995. A Systematic Analysis of Science and Technology in Japan, National Institute of Science and Technolo gy Policy
(NISTEP) Report No. 37. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM-1), 2008a. Evaluation of Measurement Data — Guide to the
Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995 with Minor Corrections). International Bureau of Weights an d
Measures (BIPM), Paris, France. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM-2), 2008. Evaluation of Measurement Data — Supplement
1 to the Guide to the Expression Of Uncertainty In Measurement — Propagation of Distributions using aMonte CarloMethod (JCGM
101:2008). International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), Paris, France. Kibira, D., Jain, S., Mclean, C., 2009. A system dynamics
modeling framework for sustainablemanufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual System Dynamics Society Conference, Albuquerque,
NM. Labuschagne, C., Brent, A., van Erck, R., 2005. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. J. Clean. Prod. 13 (4), 373–385.
McCool, S., Stankey, G., 2004. Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy. Environ.
Manage. 33 (3), 294–305. Mihelcic, J., Crittenden, J., Small, M., Shonnard, D., Hokanson, D., Zhang, Q., Hui, C., Sorby, S., James, V., Sutherland,
J., Schnoor, J., 2003. Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 5234–5314.
MIT Sloan Management Review and Boston Consulting Group, 2011. Sustainability: The ‘Embracers’ Seize Advantage, MIT Sloan
Management Review Research Report, Winter 2011. Moss, M., Grunkemeyer, T., 2007. Using resident formulated multi-dimensional
indicators to assess urban communities, progress toward meeting sustainability goals. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on
Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland, UK. OECD, 2010. Eco-innovation in industry:
enabling green growth. OECD Publishing, Paris, France. OECD CEI, 2003. OECD Environmental Indicators: Development, Measuremen t and
Use, OECD Environmental Performance and Information Division, http://www.oecd.org/env.
REVIEW JURNAL
INHAL PEMBEKALAN UMUM TUTORIAL
DASAR PERANCANGAN TEKNIK INDUSTRI
Oleh:
Mumtaz Fahd Rifmawan M.s (22522307)
Asisten Pembimbing:
Farhan Aji Pradana (M-107)
PENULIS Dorin Maier , Mihaela Maftei , Andreea Maier and Gabriela Elena Bițan
The main objective of this study is to identify whether there is a
relationship between the requirements related to the need for innovation,
TUJUAN
in particular product innovation, and the ever-present requirements
related to the sustainable development of the organization.
KESIMPULAN context of what they are doing and accessible anytime, anywhere, and in
the format and on the device of their choosing. Attracting, winning, and
retaining customers in this environment requires a concerted effort from
across the business: The organizational structure, company culture, and
business technology must all be aligned in service of the customers, in the
spirit of delivering them exactly what they want. For this reason, digital and
customer experience strategies are inexorably linked. Most every change
that organizations make to aid in their digital transformation is also in
pursuit of a better customer experience, whether directly or indirectly (Ohr,
2016).
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G. and Mol, M.J., 2008. Management Innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), pp.825-
845. Birkinshaw, J. and Mol, M., 2006. How management innovation happens. MIT Sloan Management Review, [online]
47(4), Jun., pp.81–88. Available at: [Accessed 2 September 2019]. Brad, S., 2008. Quantifying the Market Potential of An
Innovative Product Idea in the Context of University Spin-offs. Acta Technica Napocensis, 1(51), pp.7-12. Brad, S., 2010.
Ingineria si Managementul Inovării. Cluj Napoca: Universitatea Tehnica Cluj Napoca. Burz, R.-D., 2012. Development and
social security system sustainability. In: Crisis Aftermath: Economic policy changes in the EU and its Member States. [online]
Szeged: University of Szeged. Available at: [Accessed 18 April 2019]. Calik, E. and Bardudeen, F., 2016. A Measurement
Scale to Evaluate Sustainable Innovation Performance in Manufacturing Organizations. Procedia CIRP, [e-journal] 40,
pp.449- 454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.091. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P. and Laville, F., 1991. Co-word analysis
as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer
chemsitry. Scientometrics, [online] 22(1), pp.155-205. Available at: [Accessed 18 April 2019]. Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C.,
Courtial, J.P. and Laville, F., 1993. Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with
coword analysis. Scientometrics, 27(2), pp.119-143. Camisón, C. and López, A.V., 2010. An examination of the relationship
between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of
Operations and Production Management, 30(8), pp.853-878. Constantinides, C., 2011. OneDesk. [online] Product Innovation
Management: Challenges. [online] Available at: [Accessed 15 September 2019]. Damanpour, F., Walker, R.M. and
Avellaneda, C.N., 2009. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational Performance: A longitudinal study of
service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), pp.650–675. Dereli, D.D., 2015. Innovation Management in
Global Competition and Competitive Advantage. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, pp.1365-1370. França, C.L.,
Broman, G., Robert, K.H., Basile, G. and Trygg, L., 2017. An Approach to Business Model Innovation and Design for Strategic
Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 140, pp. 155-166. Gault, F., 2018. Defining and measuring
innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy, 47(3), pp.617-622. Inc., W., 2019. What is product innovation?
definition and meaning - BusinessDictionary.com. [online] Available at:
REVIEW JURNAL
INHAL PEMBEKALAN UMUM TUTORIAL
DASAR PERANCANGAN TEKNIK INDUSTRI
Oleh:
Mumtaz Fahd Rifmawan (22522307)
Asisten Pembimbing:
Farhan aji pradana (M-107)