IFRS EDITION
Prepared by
Coby Harmon
University of California, Santa
6-1 Barbara
Westmont College
PREVIEW OF CHAPTER 6
Financial Accounting
IFRS 3rd Edition
Weygandt ● Kimmel ● Kieso
6-2
CHAPTER
6 Inventories
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
6-3
Classifying and Determining Inventory
Learning Objective 1
Discuss how to classify and
Classifying Inventory determine inventory.
Merchandising Manufacturing
Company Company
6-5 LO 1
AKUNTANSI INVENTORY
1. Identifikasi khusus
1 2
A
I PENCATATAN PENILAIAN 2. Fifo A atau B
N 3. Lifo A atau B
V 4. Rata-rata:
A. Physik -Sederhana A
E M (Periodik) Harga Pokok
-Tertimbang A
N E -Bergerak B
T T
1. LCOM (LCNRV)
O O 2. Taksiran
R D B. Perpetual - Analisis Laba Kotor
Selain
Y A - Harga Pokok Eceran:
(Permanen) Harga Pokok
-lcom, Rata-rata, FIFO,
dan LIFO(MTKPRp)
Menentukan Jumlah Persediaan
Perhitungan Phisik terhadap Persediaan dilakukan karena 2 hal
Perpetual System
1. Untuk memeriksa keakuratan Catatan Persediaan
2. Untuk Menentukan Jumlah Persediaan yang hilang akibat bahan baku yang
terbuang, pengutilan (shoplifting), atau pencurian oleh karyawan.
Periodic System
3. Untuk menentukan Persediaan yang ada di perusahaan (inventory on hand).
4. Untuk menentukan cost of goods sold untuk periode tersebut.
6-7 LO 1
Determining Inventory Quantities
PERHITUNGAN PHISIK PERSEDIAAN (TAKING A PHYSICAL INVENTORY)
6-8 LO 1
WAWASAN ETIKA (ETHICS INSIGHT)
Memalsukan Persediaan untuk meningkatkan Pendapatan
(Falsifying Inventory to Boost Income)
6-9 LO 1
Determining Inventory Quantities
6-10 LO 1
DETERMINING OWNERSHIP OF GOODS
Illustration 6-2
Terms of sale
6-11 LO 1
Determining Ownership of Goods
Question
Goods in transit should be included in the inventory of the
buyer when the:
a. public carrier accepts the goods from the seller.
b. goods reach the buyer.
c. terms of sale are FOB destination.
d. terms of sale are FOB shipping point.
6-12 LO 1
Determining Ownership of Goods
Barang Konsinyasi (CONSIGNED GOODS)
6-13 LO 1
Pabrik Roti Toko Roti
6-14
ANATOMY OF A FRAUD
Ted Nickerson, CEO pabrikan jam Dally Industries, ditakuti oleh semua
karyawannya. Ted juga punya selera yang mahal. Untuk menunjang
kebiasaannya ini, Ted mengambil pinjaman besar yang dijaminkan dengan
saham biasa di Dally Industries. Jika harga saham Dally turun, dia diharuskan
memberi bank lebih banyak saham biasa. Untuk mencapai angka target laba
bersih dan dengan demikian mempertahankan harga saham, Ted memaksa
karyawan di perusahaan untuk mengubah angka persediaan. Jumlah
persediaan dimanipulasi dengan mengubah jumlah pada tag kontrol persediaan
setelah penghitungan persediaan fisik akhir tahun. Misalnya, jika tag
mengatakan ada 20 unit item tertentu, tag diubah menjadi 220. Demikian
pula, biaya unit yang digunakan untuk menentukan nilai persediaan akhir
ditingkatkan dari, misalnya, $ 125 per unit menjadi $ 1.250 . Kedua
perubahan kecurangan ini berdampak pada peningkatan jumlah persediaan
akhir yang dilaporkan. Ini mengurangi harga pokok penjualan dan
meningkatkan laba bersih.
Total take: $245,000
The Missing Control
Independent internal verification. The inventory records should have been
spot-checked periodically, verifying that the number of units agreed with the
amount on hand and that the unit costs agreed with vendor price sheets.
6-15 LO 1
> DO IT!
Perusahaan Deng Yaping menyelesaikan penghitungan inventorynya. Ini
mencapai nilai inventori total ¥ 200.000. Anda telah diberi informasi yang
tercantum di bawah ini. Diskusikan bagaimana informasi ini mempengaruhi
biaya persediaan yang dilaporkan.
1.Deng Yaping termasuk dalam persediaan barang yang disimpan sebagai
konsinyasi untuk Falls Co., seharga ¥ 15.000.
2.Perusahaan tidak memasukkan barang yang dibeli seharga ¥ 10.000 yang
sedang dalam perjalanan (syarat: FOB shipping point).
3.Perusahaan tidak memasukkan dalam hitungan persediaan yang telah
terjual dengan harga ¥ 12.000 yang sedang dalam perjalanan
(syarat: FOB shipping point).
Solution
1. Goods of ¥15,000 held on consignment should be deducted from the inventory
count.
2. The goods of ¥10,000 purchased FOB shipping point should be added to the
inventory count.
3. Item 3 was treated correctly. Inventory should be ¥195,000
(¥200,000 - ¥15,000 + ¥10,000).
6-16 LO 1
Classifying and Determining Inventory
Learning Objective 2
Persediaan dihitung sebesar Harga Perolehan Explain the accounting for
inventories and apply the
(Inventory is accounted for at cost). inventory cost flow methods.
Illustration 6-3
Data for inventory costing example
6-18 LO 2
Pada Tanggal 1 Juni 2020 Persediaan Sabun Mandi 5 unit @ Rp1.000=Rp 5.000
2 Juni Beli 20 unit @Rp1.100=Rp22.000
25 Juni Beli 30 unit @Rp1.200=Rp36.000 +
Barang Tersedia untuk dijual 55 BTUD Rp63.000
Margin keuntungan 10%
Persediaan Akhir 4 unit
a. Identifikasi khusus
1. 1 unit @ Rp1.210 hg pokoknya( Rp1.210 :1,10) x 1,00= Rp1.100 x 1 =Rp1.100
2. 3 unit @ Rp1.320 (Rp1.320 :110) x100 = Rp1.200 x3 = Rp3.600+
3. Jadi Nilai Persediaan Akhir Rp 4.700
Persediaan Akhir
Persediaan Akhir =4 x Rp1.200 =Rp4.800
LIFO =Persediaan Akhir =4 x Rp1000 =Rp4.000
Rata Sederhana 4 x 100+(1.000+1.100+1200):3 =Rp4.400
6-19 Rata2 Tertimbang 4 x(63.000:55) =Rp4.582
Beli 2000 berapa harga jual jika marginnya 20%
2000 x (1+0,2) = 2.400
(2.400 :1.2)x1
BTUD Rp2.500.000
Perd akhir Rp 50.000-
HPP……………Rp2.450.000
6-20
Specific Identification
Illustration 6-4
Specific identification method
6-21 LO 2
Specific Identification
Metode penetapan biaya arus fisik aktual di mana
barang-barang yang masih ada dalam persediaan
dihitung biayanya secara khusus untuk sampai pada
biaya total persediaan akhir.
Practice is relatively rare.
6-22 LO 2
Cost Flow Assumptions
6-23 LO 2
Cost Flow Assumptions
Data for Lin Electronics’ Astro condensers. Illustration 6-5
6-25 LO 2
FIRST-IN, FIRST-OUT (FIFO)
Illustration 6-6
Allocation of costs—FIFO method
6-26 LO 2
FIRST-IN, FIRST-OUT (FIFO)
• HELPFUL HINT
Another way of thinking about
the calculation of FIFO ending
inventory is the LISH
assumption—last in still here.
Illustration 6-6
Allocation of costs—FIFO method
6-27 LO 2
Cost Flow Assumptions
AVERAGE-COST
Allocates cost of goods available for sale on the basis
of weighted-average unit cost incurred.
Illustration 6-8
Formula for weighted-average unit cost
6-28 LO 2
AVERAGE-COST
Illustration 6-9
Allocation of costs—average-cost method
6-29 LO 2
AVERAGE-COST
Illustration 6-11
Illustration 6-9
Allocation of costs—average-cost method
6-30 LO 2
> DO IT!
Catatan Akuntansi dari Shumway Ag Implement menunjukkan data Sbb.:
Perseiaan Awal (Beginning inventory) 4,000 units @ £ 3
Pembalian (Purchases) 6,000 units @ £ 4
Penjualan (Sales) 7,000 units @ £12
Tentukan Beban Pokok Penjualan selama periode tersebut sistem
Persediaan Periodik Menggunakan metode (a) FIFO (b) biaya rata-rata
( average-cost method).
Solution
Cost of goods available for sale = (4,000 × £3) + (6,000 × £4) = £36,000
Ending inventory = 10,000 − 7,000 = 3,000 units
(a) FIFO: £36,000 − (3,000 × £4) = £24,000
(b) Average cost per unit: [(4,000 × £3) + (6,000 × £4)] ÷ 10,000 = £3.60
Average-cost: £36,000 − (3,000 × £3.60) = £25,200
6-31 LO 2
Financial Statement and Tax Effects of
Cost Flow Methods
Learning Objective 3
Explain the financial effects
Either of the two cost flow assumptions of the inventory cost flow
assumptions.
is acceptable for use. For example,
adidas (DEU) and Lenovo (CHN) use the average-cost
method, whereas
Syngenta Group (CHE) and Nokia (FIN) use FIFO.
Illustration 6-10
6-33 Comparative effects of cost flow methods LO 3
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION EFFECTS
6-34 LO 3
TAX EFFECTS
6-35 LO 3
Using Cost Flow Methods Consistently
6-36 LO 3
Cost Flow Assumptions
Question
In periods of rising prices, average-cost will produce:
a. higher net income than FIFO.
b. the same net income as FIFO.
c. lower net income than FIFO.
d. net income equal to the specific identification method.
6-37 LO 3
Cost Flow Assumptions
Question
Factors that affect the selection of an inventory costing
method do not include:
a. tax effects.
b. statement of financial position effects.
c. income statement effects.
d. perpetual vs. periodic inventory system.
6-38 LO 3
GLOBAL INSIGHT
Is LIFO Fair?
ExxonMobil Corporation (USA), like many U.S. companies, uses a cost flow
assumption called last-in, first-out (LIFO) to value its inventory for financial
reporting and tax purposes. In one recent year, this resulted in a cost of goods
sold figure that was $5.6 billion higher than under FIFO. By increasing cost of
goods sold, ExxonMobil reduces net income, which reduces taxes. Critics say
that LIFO provides an unfair “tax dodge.” As the U.S. Congress looks for more
sources of tax revenue, some lawmakers favor the elimination of LIFO.
Supporters of LIFO argue that the method is conceptually sound because it
matches current costs with current revenues. In addition, they point out that
this matching provides protection against inflation. International accounting
standards do not allow the use of LIFO. As a result, the net income of foreign
oil companies, such as BP (GBR) and Royal Dutch Shell (GBR and NLD),
are not directly comparable to U.S. companies, which makes analysis difficult.
Source: David Reilly, “Big Oil’s Accounting Methods Fuel Criticism,” Wall Street Journal
(August 8, 2006), p. C1.
6-39 LO 3
Lower-of-Cost-or-Net Realizable Value
Learning Objective 4
Explain the lower-of-cost-or-
When the value of inventory is lower net realizable value
basis of accounting for
than its cost inventories.
6-40 LO 4
Lower-of-Cost-or-Net Realizable Value
Illustration 6-11
Computation of lower-of-cost-or-net realizable value
6-41 LO 4
Inventory Errors
Learning Objective 5
Indicate the effects of
Common Causes: inventory errors on the
financial statements.
6-42 LO 5
PENGARUH TERHADAP LAPORAN LABA RUGI
6-43 LO 3
PENGARUH TERHADAP LAPORAN POSISI KEUANGAN
(STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION EFFECTS)
6-44 LO 3
Income Statement Effects
Illustration 6-13
Effects of inventory errors on current year’s income statement
6-45 LO 5
Income Statement Effects
6-46 LO 5
Income Statement Effects Illustration 6-14
Effects of inventory errors on
two years’ income statements
2016 2017
Incorrect Correct Incorrect Correct
Sales € 80,000 € 80,000 € 90,000 € 90,000
Beginning inventory 20,000 20,000 12,000 15,000
Cost of goods purchased 40,000 40,000 68,000 68,000
Cost of goods available 60,000 60,000 80,000 83,000
Ending inventory 12,000 15,000 23,000 23,000
Cost of good sold 48,000 45,000 57,000 60,000
Gross profit 32,000 35,000 33,000 30,000
Operating expenses 10,000 10,000 20,000 20,000
Net income € 22,000 € 25,000 € 13,000 € 10,000
6-47 LO 5
Income Statement Effects
Question
Atlantis Company’s ending inventory is understated
NT$122,000. The effects of this error on the current year’s
cost of goods sold and net income, respectively, are:
a. understated, overstated.
b. overstated, understated.
c. overstated, overstated.
d. understated, understated.
6-48 LO 5
Statement of Financial Position Effects
Illustration 6-15
Effects of ending inventory errors on statement of financial position
6-49 LO 5
> DO IT!
6-51 LO 5
Statement Presentation and Analysis
Learning Objective 6
Discuss the presentation
Presentation and analysis of inventory.
6-54 LO 6
Analysis
Illustration 6-17
Inventory turnover formula Days in Inventory: Inventory turnover of 3.7
and computation for Esprit
Holdings (in millions) times divided into 365 is approximately 99 days.
This is the approximate time that it takes a
company to sell the inventory.
6-55 LO 6
ACCOUNTING ACROSS THE ORGANIZATION
Improving Inventory Control with RFID
Many large retailers have improved their inventory control with the
introduction of radio frequency identification (RFID). Much like bar
codes, which tell a retailer the number of boxes of a specific
product it has, RFID goes an additional step, helping to distinguish
one box of a specific product from another. RFID uses technology
similar to that used by keyless remotes that unlock car doors.
Companies currently use RFID to track shipments from supplier to
distribution center to store. Other potential uses include monitoring
product expiration dates and acting quickly on product recalls.
Many companies also anticipate faster returns and warranty
processing using RFID. This technology will further assist
managers in their efforts to ensure that their store has just the right
type of inventory, in just the right amount, in just the right place.
6-56 LO 6
> DO IT!
Early in 2017, Seoul Company switched to a just-in-time inventory
system. Its sales, cost of goods sold, and inventory amounts for 2016
and 2017 are shown below.
2016 2017
Sales revenue ₩2,000,000 ₩1,800,000
Cost of goods sold 1,000,000 910,000
Beginning inventory 290,000 210,000
Ending inventory 210,000 50,000
Determine the inventory turnover and days in inventory for 2016 and
2017. 2016 2017
6-57 LO 6
APPENDIX 6A Perpetual Inventory System
Learning Objective 7
Apply the inventory cost
Illustration 6A-1 flow methods to perpetual
Inventoriable units and costs inventory records.
Illustration 6A-2
Perpetual system—FIFO Cost of Goods
Ending Inventory
Sold
6-59 LO 7
Average-Cost
Illustration 6A-3
Perpetual system— Cost of Goods Ending Inventory
average-cost method
Sold
6-60 LO 7
APPENDIX 6B Estimating Inventories
Learning Objective 8
Describe the two methods
Gross Profit Method of estimating inventories.
Illustration 6B-1
Gross profit method formulas
6-61 LO 8
Gross Profit Method
Illustration: Kishwaukee Company’s records for January show net sales
of $200,000, beginning inventory $40,000, and cost of goods purchased
$120,000. The company expects to earn a 30% gross profit rate.
Compute the estimated cost of the ending inventory at January 31 under
the gross profit method. Illustration 6B-2
Example of gross profit method
6-62
Retail Inventory Method
Illustration 6B-3
Retail inventory method formulas
6-63 LO 8
Retail Inventory Method
6-64 LO 8
APPENDIX 6C LIFO Inventory Method
Learning Objective 9
Apply the LIFO inventory
Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) costing method.
6-65 LO 9
Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)
Illustration 6C-1
Allocation of costs—LIFO method
6-66 LO 9
Last-In-First-Out (LIFO)
Illustration 6C-1
Allocation of costs—LIFO method
Illustration 6C-2
Proof of COGS
6-67 LO 9
A Look at U.S. GAAP Learning Objective 10
Compare the accounting for
inventories under IFRS and
U.S. GAAP.
Key Points
The requirements for accounting for and reporting inventories are more
principles-based under IFRS. That is, GAAP provides more detailed
guidelines in inventory accounting.
IFRS requires companies to use the same cost flow assumption for all goods
of a similar nature. GAAP has no specific requirement in this area.
Similarities
The definitions for inventory are essentially similar under GAAP and IFRS.
Both define inventory as assets held-for-sale in the ordinary course of
business, in the process of production for sale (work in process), or to be
consumed in the production of goods or services (e.g., raw materials).
Who owns the goods—goods in transit or consigned goods—as well as the
costs to include in inventory, are accounted for the same under GAAP and
IFRS.
6-68 LO 10
A Look at U.S. GAAP
Key Points
Differences
Both GAAP and IFRS permit specific identification where appropriate. IFRS
actually requires that the specific identification method be used where the
inventory items are not interchangeable (i.e., can be specifically identified).
If the inventory items are not specifically identifiable, a cost flow
assumption is used. GAAP does not specify situations in which specific
identification must be used.
A major difference between IFRS and GAAP relates to the LIFO cost flow
assumption. GAAP permits the use of LIFO for inventory valuation. IFRS
prohibits its use. FIFO and average-cost are the only two acceptable cost
flow assumptions permitted under IFRS.
6-69 LO 10
A Look at U.S. GAAP
Key Points
Differences
When testing to see if the value of inventory has fallen below its cost, IFRS
defines market as net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated
selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs to
complete and sell. In other words, net realizable value is the best estimate
of the net amounts that inventories are expected to realize. GAAP, on the
other hand, defines market as essentially replacement cost. The GAAP
method of inventory valuation is often referred to as the lower-of-cost-or-
market (LCM).
6-70 LO 10
A Look at U.S. GAAP
Key Points
Differences
Under GAAP, if inventory is written down under the lower-of-cost-or-market
valuation, the new basis is now considered its cost. As a result, the
inventory may not be written back up to its original cost in a subsequent
period. Under IFRS, the write-down may be reversed in a subsequent
period up to the amount of the previous write-down. Both the write-down
and any subsequent reversal should be reported on the income statement.
IFRS generally requires pre-harvest inventories of agricultural products
(e.g., growing crops and farm animals) to be reported at fair value less cost
of disposal. GAAP generally requires these items to be recorded at cost.
6-71 LO 10
A Look at U.S. GAAP
Looking to the Future
One convergence issue that will be difficult to resolve relates to the use of the
LIFO cost flow assumption. As indicated, IFRS specifically prohibits its use.
Conversely, the LIFO cost flow assumption is widely used in the United States
because of its favorable tax advantages. In addition, many argue that LIFO
from a financial reporting point of view provides a better matching of current
costs against revenue and, therefore, enables companies to compute a more
realistic income.
6-72 LO 10
A Look at U.S. GAAP
A Look at IFRS
GAAP Self-Test Questions
Which of the following should not be included in the inventory of a
company using GAAP?
a) Goods held on consignment from another company.
b) Goods shipped on consignment to another company.
c) Goods in transit from another company shipped FOB
shipping point.
d) None of the above.
6-73 LO 10
A Look at U.S. GAAP
A Look at IFRS
GAAP Self-Test Questions
Which method of inventory costing is prohibited under IFRS?
a) Specific identification.
b) FIFO.
c) LIFO.
d) Average-cost.
6-74 LO 10
A Look at U.S. GAAP
A Look at IFRS
GAAP Self-Test Questions
Specific identification:
a) must be used under IFRS if the inventory items are not
interchangeable.
b) cannot be used under IFRS.
c) cannot be used under GAAP.
d) must be used under IFRS if it would result in the most
conservative net income.
6-75 LO 10
Copyright
“Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in
Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the
express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
Request for further information should be addressed to the
Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may
make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution
or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors,
omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from
the use of the information contained herein.”
6-76