Anda di halaman 1dari 21

Nama: Dina Fadilah

NIM: 100020005

1. Judul Penelitian: Efektifitas Karbon Aktif Kulit Ubi Kayu Dalam Menurunkan
Kadar BOD Air Limbah Pabrik Tepung Tapioka

2. Permasalahan: menurunkan kadar BOD dengan menggunakan arang akif kulit


ubi kayu

3. Hipotesis:
Variabel Bebas: Variabel Terikat

Karbon Aktif:
20 gr
Kadar BOD
40 gr
60 gr
4. Analisis Data
a. Analisis Data Univariat
Tabel 1
Distribusi Hasil pemeriksaan kandungan BOD limbah pabrik tepung tapioka
pada setiap pengulangan selama penelitian dapat dilihat pada tabel 1.

Pengulangan Satuan Perlakuan Dosis


0 1 2 3
(Kontrol) (20 gram) (40 gram) (60
gram)
P1 mg/l 332,4 165,6 157,2
P2 mg/l 270,4 196,8 156
P3 mg/l 1032 486,6 229,2 136,8
P4 mg/l 480,1 173,2 145,1
P5 mg/l 311,1 218,1 158,7
P6 mg/l 326,8 226,8 130,8
Rata-rata mg/l 1032 367,9 201,6 147,4
Penurunan (%) 0 64,35 80,90 85,17
Maksimum mg/l 1032 486,6 229,2 158,7
Minimum mg/l 1032 270,4 165,6 130,8
Berdasarkan tabel diatas dapat dilihat bahwa kandungan BOD pada limbah cair
pabrik tepung tapioka sebelum perlakuan adsorbsi dengan karbon aktif kulit ubi
kayu didapatkan hasil 1032 mg/l, kemudian setelah perlakuan diperoleh
kandungan BOD terendah pada dosis 20 gram terjadi penurunan dengan rata-rata
368,9 mg/l, dosis 40 terjadi penurunan dengan rata-rata 201,6 mg/l dan dosis 60
gram terjadi penurunan dengan rata-rata 147,4 mg/l.
b. Analisis Data Bivariat

Untuk dapat mengetahui pengaruh tersebut signifikan atau tidak selanjutnya


dilakukan uji F. Dengan taraf signifikan 95% (a = 0,050) hipotesis diterima
bila Fhitung < Ftabel (a; k; n-k-1) begitu sebaliknya pada hipotesis ditolak.

Tabel 3. ANOVAb
Model Sum of Df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
Regression 158383.063 2 79191.532 25.357 .000a
Residual 46846.022 15 3123.068
Total 205229.085 17
a. Predictors: (Constant), Karbon Aktif
b. Dependent Variabel: BOD

Berdasarkan analisa tabel anova di atas dapat dilihat nilai Fhitung sebesar
25.357 dan Ftabel (ak; n-k-1) = Ftabel (0,05; 1; 18-1-1) = F tabel (0.05;1;16)
= 4.49. artinya Ho ditolak karena Fhitung > Ftabel yaitu 25.357 < 4.49
artinya ada pengaruh yang signifikan pada penambahan karbon aktif kulit ubi
kayu dalam menurunkan kadar BOD air limbah pabrik tepung tapioka.

Hipotesis
Ho: Tidak ada penurunan kadar BOD pada penggunaan arang aktif limbah kulit
ubi kayu
Ha: Ada penurunan kadar BOD pada penggunaan arang aktif limbah kulit ubi
kayu

Kesimpulan
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tentang "Efektifitas karbon aktif kulit ubi kayu
dalam menurunkan kadar BOD air limbah pabrik tepung tapioka tahun." yang
telah dilakukan dapat diambil kesimpulan sebagai berikut:
1. Karbon aktif dari kulit ubi kayu sangat efektif untuk menurunkan kadar
BOD limbah cair pabrik tepung tapioka.
2. Dosis efektif dalam menurunkan kadar BOD air limbah pabrik tepung
tapioka adalah 60 gram dengan penurunan rata-rata 147,4 mg/l dengan
persentase 85,17%
Frequencies

Notes
Output Created 19-JAN-2023 13:57:48
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet6
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 18
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases
with valid data.
Syntax FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=kulitubikayu
kadarbod
/STATISTICS=STDDEV
MINIMUM MAXIMUM SEMEAN
MEAN MEDIAN MODE
/HISTOGRAM NORMAL
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:06.28
Elapsed Time 00:00:05.20

[DataSet6]

Statistics
Kulit Ubi Kayu Analisa BOD
N Valid 18 18
Missing 0 0
Mean 2.000 238.983
Std. Error of Mean .1980 25.8976
Median 2.000 207.450
Mode 1.0a 130.8a
Std. Deviation .8402 109.8740
Minimum 1.0 130.8
Maximum 3.0 486.6
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown

Frequency Table
Kulit Ubi Kayu
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 20 gram 6 33.3 33.3 33.3
40 gram 6 33.3 33.3 66.7
60 gram 6 33.3 33.3 100.0
Total 18 100.0 100.0

Analisa BOD
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 130.8 1 5.6 5.6 5.6
136.8 1 5.6 5.6 11.1
145.1 1 5.6 5.6 16.7
156.0 1 5.6 5.6 22.2
157.2 1 5.6 5.6 27.8
158.7 1 5.6 5.6 33.3
165.6 1 5.6 5.6 38.9
173.2 1 5.6 5.6 44.4
196.8 1 5.6 5.6 50.0
218.1 1 5.6 5.6 55.6
226.8 1 5.6 5.6 61.1
229.2 1 5.6 5.6 66.7
270.4 1 5.6 5.6 72.2
311.1 1 5.6 5.6 77.8
326.8 1 5.6 5.6 83.3
332.4 1 5.6 5.6 88.9
480.1 1 5.6 5.6 94.4
486.6 1 5.6 5.6 100.0
Total 18 100.0 100.0
Histogram
EXAMINE VARIABLES=kadarbod BY kulitubikayu
/PLOT BOXPLOT STEMLEAF HISTOGRAM NPPLOT
/COMPARE GROUPS
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/CINTERVAL 95
/MISSING LISTWISE
/NOTOTAL.

Explore

Notes
Output Created 19-JAN-2023 14:06:15
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet6
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 18
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values for
dependent variables are treated
as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on cases
with no missing values for any
dependent variable or factor
used.
Syntax EXAMINE
VARIABLES=kadarbod BY
kulitubikayu
/PLOT BOXPLOT STEMLEAF
HISTOGRAM NPPLOT
/COMPARE GROUPS
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/CINTERVAL 95
/MISSING LISTWISE
/NOTOTAL.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:07.89
Elapsed Time 00:00:05.96

Kulit Ubi Kayu

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
Kulit Ubi Kayu N Percent N Percent N Percent
Analisa BOD 20 gram 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0%
40 gram 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0%
60 gram 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0%

Descriptives
Kulit Ubi Kayu Statistic Std. Error
Analisa BOD 20 gram Mean 367.900 37.5768
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 271.306
Mean Upper Bound 464.494
5% Trimmed Mean 366.722
Median 329.600
Variance 8472.096
Std. Deviation 92.0440
Minimum 270.4
Maximum 486.6
Range 216.2
Interquartile Range 180.8
Skewness .716 .845
Kurtosis -1.742 1.741
40 gram Mean 201.617 11.2467
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 172.706
Mean Upper Bound 230.527
5% Trimmed Mean 202.085
Median 207.450
Variance 758.930
Std. Deviation 27.5487
Minimum 165.6
Maximum 229.2
Range 63.6
Interquartile Range 56.1
Skewness -.407 .845
Kurtosis -2.130 1.741
60 gram Mean 147.433 4.7989
95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound 135.097
Mean Upper Bound 159.769
5% Trimmed Mean 147.731
Median 150.550
Variance 138.179
Std. Deviation 11.7549
Minimum 130.8
Maximum 158.7
Range 27.9
Interquartile Range 22.3
Skewness -.522 .845
Kurtosis -1.852 1.741

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Kulit Ubi Kayu Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
Analisa BOD 20 gram .317 6 .060 .825 6 .097
40 gram .225 6 .200* .881 6 .274
60 gram .267 6 .200* .878 6 .259
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Analisa BOD

Histograms
Stem-and-Leaf Plots

Analisa BOD Stem-and-Leaf Plot for


kulitubikayu= 20 gram

Frequency Stem & Leaf

1.00 2 . 7
3.00 3 . 123
2.00 4 . 88

Stem width: 100.0


Each leaf: 1 case(s)
Analisa BOD Stem-and-Leaf Plot for
kulitubikayu= 40 gram

Frequency Stem & Leaf

3.00 1 . 679
3.00 2 . 122

Stem width: 100.0


Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Analisa BOD Stem-and-Leaf Plot for


kulitubikayu= 60 gram

Frequency Stem & Leaf

2.00 13 . 06
1.00 14 . 5
3.00 15 . 678

Stem width: 10.0


Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Normal Q-Q Plots


Detrended Normal Q-Q Plots
ONEWAY kadarbod BY kulitubikayu
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=BONFERRONI ALPHA(0.05).

Oneway

Notes
Output Created 19-JAN-2023 14:09:48
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet6
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 18
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are
based on cases with no missing
data for any variable in the
analysis.
Syntax ONEWAY kadarbod BY
kulitubikayu
/STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=BONFERRONI
ALPHA(0.05).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.03

Descriptives
Analisa BOD
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Mini
20 gram 6 367.900 92.0440 37.5768 271.306 464.494
40 gram 6 201.617 27.5487 11.2467 172.706 230.527
60 gram 6 147.433 11.7549 4.7989 135.097 159.769
Total 18 238.983 109.8740 25.8976 184.344 293.622

ANOVA
Analisa BOD
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 158383.063 2 79191.532 25.357 .000
Within Groups 46846.022 15 3123.068
Total 205229.085 17
Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Analisa BOD
Bonferroni
Mean Difference 95% Confidence Inte
(I) Kulit Ubi Kayu (J) Kulit Ubi Kayu (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Uppe
20 gram 40 gram 166.2833 *
32.2649 .000 79.370
60 gram 220.4667 *
32.2649 .000 133.553
40 gram 20 gram -166.2833* 32.2649 .000 -253.197
60 gram 54.1833 32.2649 .341 -32.730
60 gram 20 gram -220.4667 *
32.2649 .000 -307.380
40 gram -54.1833 32.2649 .341 -141.097
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai