Pertanyaan Fokus
Yes No Unknown
Bagian A : Apakah hasilnya valid?
A. Apakah studi tersebut menjelaskan masalahnya secara fokus √
(studi populasi, intervensi, kelompok kontrol/intervensi, hasil)
B. Apakah pembagian pasien kedalam kelompok intervensi dan √
kontrol dilakukan secara acak (bagaimana dilakukan, apakah
alokasi pasien dilakukan secara tersembunyi dari penelitian
dan penelitian)
C. Apakah semua pasien yang terlibat dalam penelitian dicatat √
dengan benar di kesimpulan (apakah dihentikan lebih awal,
apakah pasien dianalisis dalam kelompok untuk yang mereka
acak)
D. Apakah pasien, petugas kesehatan, dan responden pada √
penelitian ini “blind” terhadap intervensi yang dilaksanakan
E. Apakah waktu pelaksanaan untuk setiap grup sama? √
F. Selain intervensi yang dilaksanakan, apakah setiap grup √
diperlakukan sama/adil?
Bagian B : Apa hasilnya?
A. Seberapa besar efek dari intervensi tersebut (outcome, √
hasilnya dijelaskan spesifik, hasil yang ditemukan, hasil
dari setiap outcome yang diatur)
B. Seberapa tepat dan akurat efek intervensi? √
Bagian C : Apakah hasil membantu secara lokal?
A. Bisakah hasilnya diterapkan pada populasi lokal, atau √
konteks saat ini di lingkungan sekarang (apakah
karakteristik pasien sama dengan tempat bekerja/populasi
anda, jika berbeda apakah perbedaannya)
B. Apakah hasil penelitian ini penting secara klinis untuk √
dipertimbangkan (apakah informasi yang anda inginkan
sudah terdapat dalam penelitian, jika tidak apakah akan
berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan)
C. Apakah manfaatnya sepadan dengan bahaya dan biaya √
yang dibutuhkan (meskipun tidak tercantum dalam
penelitian, bagaimana menurut anda?)
CRITICAL APPRAISAL JURNAL 2
Pengaruh Audiovisual Menonton Film Kartun terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan Saat
Prosedur Injeksi pada Anak Prasekolah
Pertanyaan Fokus
Yes No Unknown
Bagian A : Apakah hasilnya valid?
A. Apakah studi tersebut menjelaskan masalahnya secara fokus √
(studi populasi, intervensi, kelompok kontrol/intervensi, hasil)
B. Apakah pembagian pasien kedalam kelompok intervensi dan √
kontrol dilakukan secara acak (bagaimana dilakukan, apakah
alokasi pasien dilakukan secara tersembunyi dari penelitian
dan penelitian)
C. Apakah semua pasien yang terlibat dalam penelitian dicatat √
dengan benar di kesimpulan (apakah dihentikan lebih awal,
apakah pasien dianalisis dalam kelompok untuk yang mereka
acak)
D. Apakah pasien, petugas kesehatan, dan responden pada √
penelitian ini “blind” terhadap intervensi yang dilaksanakan
E. Apakah waktu pelaksanaan untuk setiap grup sama? √
F. Selain intervensi yang dilaksanakan, apakah setiap grup √
diperlakukan sama/adil?
Bagian B : Apa hasilnya?
A. Seberapa besar efek dari intervensi tersebut (outcome, √
hasilnya dijelaskan spesifik, hasil yang ditemukan, hasil
dari setiap outcome yang diatur)
B. Seberapa tepat dan akurat efek intervensi? √
Bagian C : Apakah hasil membantu secara lokal?
A. Bisakah hasilnya diterapkan pada populasi lokal, atau √
konteks saat ini di lingkungan sekarang (apakah
karakteristik pasien sama dengan tempat bekerja/populasi
anda, jika berbeda apakah perbedaannya)
B. Apakah hasil penelitian ini penting secara klinis untuk √
dipertimbangkan (apakah informasi yang anda inginkan
sudah terdapat dalam penelitian, jika tidak apakah akan
berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan)
C. Apakah manfaatnya sepadan dengan bahaya dan biaya √
yang dibutuhkan (meskipun tidak tercantum dalam
penelitian, bagaimana menurut anda?)
CRITICAL APPRAISAL JURNAL 3
Psychological Preparation Reduces Preoperative Anxiety in Children.
Randomized and Double-Blind Trial
Pertanyaan Fokus
Yes No Unknown
Bagian A : Apakah hasilnya valid?
A. Apakah studi tersebut menjelaskan masalahnya secara fokus √
(studi populasi, intervensi, kelompok kontrol/intervensi, hasil)
B. Apakah pembagian pasien kedalam kelompok intervensi dan √
kontrol dilakukan secara acak (bagaimana dilakukan, apakah
alokasi pasien dilakukan secara tersembunyi dari penelitian
dan penelitian)
C. Apakah semua pasien yang terlibat dalam penelitian dicatat √
dengan benar di kesimpulan (apakah dihentikan lebih awal,
apakah pasien dianalisis dalam kelompok untuk yang mereka
acak)
D. Apakah pasien, petugas kesehatan, dan responden pada √
penelitian ini “blind” terhadap intervensi yang dilaksanakan
E. Apakah waktu pelaksanaan untuk setiap grup sama? √
F. Selain intervensi yang dilaksanakan, apakah setiap grup √
diperlakukan sama/adil?
Bagian B : Apa hasilnya?
A. Seberapa besar efek dari intervensi tersebut (outcome, √
hasilnya dijelaskan spesifik, hasil yang ditemukan, hasil
dari setiap outcome yang diatur)
B. Seberapa tepat dan akurat efek intervensi? √
Bagian C : Apakah hasil membantu secara lokal?
A. Bisakah hasilnya diterapkan pada populasi lokal, atau √
konteks saat ini di lingkungan sekarang (apakah
karakteristik pasien sama dengan tempat bekerja/populasi
anda, jika berbeda apakah perbedaannya)
B. Apakah hasil penelitian ini penting secara klinis untuk √
dipertimbangkan (apakah informasi yang anda inginkan
sudah terdapat dalam penelitian, jika tidak apakah akan
berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan)
C. Apakah manfaatnya sepadan dengan bahaya dan biaya √
yang dibutuhkan (meskipun tidak tercantum dalam
penelitian, bagaimana menurut anda?)
CRITICAL APPRAISAL JURNAL 4
Video Distraction and Parental Presence for the Management of Preoperative Anxiety
and Postoperative Behavioral Disturbance in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Pertanyaan Fokus
Yes No Unknown
Bagian A : Apakah hasilnya valid?
A. Apakah studi tersebut menjelaskan masalahnya secara fokus √
(studi populasi, intervensi, kelompok kontrol/intervensi, hasil)
B. Apakah pembagian pasien kedalam kelompok intervensi dan √
kontrol dilakukan secara acak (bagaimana dilakukan, apakah
alokasi pasien dilakukan secara tersembunyi dari penelitian
dan penelitian)
C. Apakah semua pasien yang terlibat dalam penelitian dicatat √
dengan benar di kesimpulan (apakah dihentikan lebih awal,
apakah pasien dianalisis dalam kelompok untuk yang mereka
acak)
D. Apakah pasien, petugas kesehatan, dan responden pada √
penelitian ini “blind” terhadap intervensi yang dilaksanakan
E. Apakah waktu pelaksanaan untuk setiap grup sama? √
F. Selain intervensi yang dilaksanakan, apakah setiap grup √
diperlakukan sama/adil?
Bagian B : Apa hasilnya?
A. Seberapa besar efek dari intervensi tersebut (outcome, √
hasilnya dijelaskan spesifik, hasil yang ditemukan, hasil
dari setiap outcome yang diatur)
B. Seberapa tepat dan akurat efek intervensi? √
Bagian C : Apakah hasil membantu secara lokal?
A. Bisakah hasilnya diterapkan pada populasi lokal, atau √
konteks saat ini di lingkungan sekarang (apakah
karakteristik pasien sama dengan tempat bekerja/populasi
anda, jika berbeda apakah perbedaannya)
B. Apakah hasil penelitian ini penting secara klinis untuk √
dipertimbangkan (apakah informasi yang anda inginkan
sudah terdapat dalam penelitian, jika tidak apakah akan
berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan)
C. Apakah manfaatnya sepadan dengan bahaya dan biaya √
yang dibutuhkan (meskipun tidak tercantum dalam
penelitian, bagaimana menurut anda?)
CRITICAL APPRAISAL JURNAL 5
Video Kartun dan Video Animasi dapat Menurunkan Tingkat Kecemasan Pre
Operasi pada Anak Usia Pra Sekolah
Pertanyaan Fokus
Yes No Unknown
Bagian A : Apakah hasilnya valid?
A. Apakah studi tersebut menjelaskan masalahnya secara fokus √
(studi populasi, intervensi, kelompok kontrol/intervensi, hasil)
B. Apakah pembagian pasien kedalam kelompok intervensi dan √
kontrol dilakukan secara acak (bagaimana dilakukan, apakah
alokasi pasien dilakukan secara tersembunyi dari penelitian
dan penelitian)
C. Apakah semua pasien yang terlibat dalam penelitian dicatat √
dengan benar di kesimpulan (apakah dihentikan lebih awal,
apakah pasien dianalisis dalam kelompok untuk yang mereka
acak)
D. Apakah pasien, petugas kesehatan, dan responden pada √
penelitian ini “blind” terhadap intervensi yang dilaksanakan
E. Apakah waktu pelaksanaan untuk setiap grup sama? √
F. Selain intervensi yang dilaksanakan, apakah setiap grup √
diperlakukan sama/adil?
Bagian B : Apa hasilnya?
A. Seberapa besar efek dari intervensi tersebut (outcome, √
hasilnya dijelaskan spesifik, hasil yang ditemukan, hasil
dari setiap outcome yang diatur)
B. Seberapa tepat dan akurat efek intervensi? √
Bagian C : Apakah hasil membantu secara lokal?
A. Bisakah hasilnya diterapkan pada populasi lokal, atau √
konteks saat ini di lingkungan sekarang (apakah
karakteristik pasien sama dengan tempat bekerja/populasi
anda, jika berbeda apakah perbedaannya)
B. Apakah hasil penelitian ini penting secara klinis untuk √
dipertimbangkan (apakah informasi yang anda inginkan
sudah terdapat dalam penelitian, jika tidak apakah akan
berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan)
C. Apakah manfaatnya sepadan dengan bahaya dan biaya √
yang dibutuhkan (meskipun tidak tercantum dalam
penelitian, bagaimana menurut anda?)
Lampiran 2
Petunjuk pengisian : Isilah data di bawah ini dengan lengkap dan berilah
1. Nomor Responden :
2. Nama Responden :
4. Umur : Tahun
5. Tanggal Pemeriksaan :
7. Diagnosa Penyakit :
II. Lembar Observasi Tingkat Kecemasan
A. Kegiatan
kebiasaan lainnya).
tuanya.
tangan atau dengan seluruh tubuh, tidak mau bermain dan tidak mau
B. Pernyataan
menganggukkan kepala
kesehatan
2. Anak berdiam diri dengan duduk tenang dan diam, menatap orang
berpisah dengan orang tuanya, memegang erat orang tua dan tidak
Video 2 : Doraemon - Pesawat UFO Alien & Beso Anjing Pengganti Manusia
Sumber : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKEp-7xXK44
Video 3 : BoBoiBoy – Season 1 Episode 2 Part 1
Sumber : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_H8fQZQUDM&t=18s
Sumber : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FblP0vn3qxI
Lampiran 5
LEMBAR BIMBINGAN
PENYUSUNAN KARYA ILMIAH PROGRAM STUDI PROFESI NERS
JURUSAN KEPERAWATAN – POLTEKKES KEMENKES
SEMARANG
TTD
No Hari/Tanggal Materi Bimbingan Saran Bimbingan
Pembimbing
4. Selasa, 18 Perbaikan (revisi) Durasi pelaksanaan penerapan
Februari pasca Proposal EBP menonton video kartun
2020 KIN dan animasi lebih diperjelas
TTD
No Hari/Tanggal Materi Bimbingan Saran Bimbingan
Pembimbing
4. Selasa, 18 Perbaikan (revisi) Laporan KIN tidak dilakukan
Februari pasca Proposal implementasi karena adanya
2020 KIN pandemic Covid 19
2. PENGUJI II
Suharto, S.Pd., MN
NIP. 196605101986031001
[Downloaded free from http://www.njcponline.com on Sunday, January 26, 2020, IP: 118.96.98.61]
Original Article
Department of
Anesthesiology and Background: Preoperative anxiety is a critical issue in children, and
ABSTRA
Reanimation, Faculty associated with postoperative behavioral changes. Aims: The purpose of the
of Medicine, Cukurova current study is to evaluate how audiovisual and auditory presentations about the
University, Adana, Turkey perioperative period impact preoperative anxiety and postoperative behavioral
disturbances of children undergoing elective ambulatory surgery. Materials and
Methods: A total of 99 patients between the ages of 5–12, scheduled to undergo
outpatient surgery, participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned
to one of three groups; audiovisual group (Group V, n = 33), auditory group
(Group A, n = 33), and control group (Group C, n = 33). During the evaluation,
the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (M-YPAS) and the
posthospitalization behavioral questionnaire (PHBQ) were used. Results: There
were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the
groups. M-YPAS scores were significantly lower in Group V than in Groups C
and A (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). PHBQ scores in Group C were
statistically higher than in Groups A and V, but, no statistical difference was
found between Groups A and V. Conclusion: Compared to auditory
presentations, audiovisual presentations, in terms of being memorable and
interesting, may be more effective in reducing children’s anxiety. In addition, we
can suggest that both methods can be equally effective for postoperative
Date of Acceptance: behavioral changes.
22-Nov-2017
DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_227_17 How to cite this article: Hatipoglu Z, Gulec E, Lafli D, Ozcengiz D.
Effects of auditory and audiovisual presentations on anxiety and
behavioral changes in children undergoing elective surgery. Niger
PMID: *******
J Clin Pract 2017;XX:XX-XX.
788© 2018 Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice | Published by Wolters Kluwer ‑ Medknow
[Downloaded free from http://www.njcponline.com on Sunday, January 26, 2020, IP: 118.96.98.61]
There are three methods which are known to be analgesia management, preoperative fasting, and regular
effective in learning; i.e., visual (pictures, images, use of the drug to be administered after surgery). Parents
demonstrations), auditory (reading, words, listening), and accompanied their children during this time. Patient’s
kinesthetic (touch, taste). Visual images are important
age, gender, history of previous surgery, type of surgery,
to visual learning, in which body language is also
and parent’s age, gender, and educational level were
used. It is also important to be informed by listening
recorded.
to auditory learning.[7] Most people learn best using
a combination of both, although visual learning is Measurements
usually the prominent component.[8] To the best of our The children in all groups were admitted with one
knowledge, an auditory-related (listening) study outside of the parents into the preoperative holding room.
of music therapy is not available for preoperative anxiety The preoperative anxiety levels of children were
management while there are limited audiovisual studies measured with the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety
involving children in the literature.[9-11] Scale (M-YPAS) at induction of anesthesia after being
The current study was designed to compare the effects taken into the operating room. This assessment was made
of audiovisual and auditory presentations on preoperative by an anesthesiologist who was blinded to the groups.
anxiety and postoperative behavioral disturbances of In brief, the M-YPAS is used to measure children’s
children undergoing elective ambulatory surgery. The anxiety in the preoperative holding area and during
primary end point was the preoperative anxiety levels induction of anesthesia. The M-YPAS contains 22 items
of patients. The secondary end point was the behavioral in five categories (activity, emotional expressivity,
changes of children in the postoperative period. state of arousal, vocalization, and use of parents). The
scoring in each category is done with a different number
MATERIALS AND METHODS of items (either four or six). A total adjusted score
Patients is calculated with a formula after evaluating partial
weight ([activity/4+ emotional expressivity/4+ state of
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional
arousal/4+ use of parents/4+ vocalization/6] ×100/5). The
Ethics Committee of the Cukurova University, Faculty
cutoff point of 30 on the M-YPAS leads to balance in
of Medicine (no: 45/2015). We enrolled patients between
March 2015 and February 2016. Written informed which the sensitivity and specificity are high, and the
consent was obtained from all the parents. Ninety-nine predictive value is 79%.[12]
patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Postoperative maladaptive behaviors of children were
physical Status I-II, aged 5–12 years old and scheduled assessed using the posthospitalization behavioral
for outpatient surgery (e.g., orchiopexy, hypospadias questionnaire (PHBQ). Parents were contacted by
surgery, inguinal hernia, tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy, telephone 7 days after hospital discharge, and this
and strabismus surgery) were accepted in the present assessment was performed by the same anesthesiologist.
study. Children with chronic illness, undergoing In brief, the PHBQ contains a total of 27 items in the
emergency surgery, cognitive disorders, and parents who following six subscales: general anxiety and regression,
refuse to participate were excluded from this study. separation anxiety, eating disturbance, aggression toward
Study design authority, apathy/withdrawal, and anxiety about sleep.
The study participants were allocated to the groups using The PHBQ is scored by parents using five response
a computer-generated randomization list at preoperative options: much less than before (1), less than before (2),
visit: audiovisual group (Group V, n = 33), auditory same as before (3), more than before (4), and much more
group (Group A, n = 33), and the standard of care than before.[13] Psychometric properties of the PHBQ
group (Group C, n = 33). have been shown in a study of Vernon et al.[14] We
considered the negative behavioral change as a response
After all patients were examined by an anesthesiologist of 4 or 5 for an item of the PHBQ.[15]
at hospital admission 1 week before surgery, the
following applications were presented: the patients in Anesthesia management
Group V were shown an audiovisual presentation to After 6 h of fasting, the children were taken into a
inform about preoperative preparation and postoperative preoperative holding area and none of the children
period [Appendix 1]. The sound recording of this video used any premedication. The children were taken
was listened to by the patients in Group A without the accompanied by their parents into the operating room
visual element of the audiovisual presentation. The from the preoperative holding area. Standard monitoring
patients in Group C were verbally informed on usual the was applied to patients (electrocardiogram, pulse
anesthesia practice of our hospital (e.g., anesthesia and oximeter, and noninvasive blood pressure). Anesthesia
induction was provided with 6%–8% sevoflurane and
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice ¦ Volume 21 ¦ Issue 6 ¦ June 2018789
[Downloaded free from http://www.njcponline.com on Sunday, January 26, 2020, IP: 118.96.98.61]
a gas mixture of (40%–60%) oxygen/nitrous oxide. the statistical hypotheses were fulfilled or not. For
After placing intravenous (IV) cannula on the hand, normally distributed data, regarding the homogeneity of
rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered and all patients variances, Bonferroni, Scheffe, Tamhane tests were used
were intubated. Fluid resuscitation was accomplished for multiple comparisons of groups. For abnormally
with Ringer’s lactate solution (3–5 ml/kg/h). After distributed data, a Bonferroni adjusted Mann–Whitney
anesthesia induction, the parents were taken out of U-test was used for multiple comparisons of groups.
the operating room with a nurse. Maintenance of To evaluate the correlations between measurements, the
anesthesia was provided with 1%–2% sevoflurane and Pearson correlation coefficient was used. Multivariate
a gas mixture of (40%–60%) oxygen/nitrous oxide. logistic regression analysis was used to determine the
For intraoperative analgesia, fentanyl 1 g/kg was predictors of postoperative maladaptive behaviors.
given. Tramadol (2 mg/kg, IV) was administered for According to the “cutoff points,” patients were divided
postoperative analgesia in all patients. After the end into two subgroups; a calm group that included
of the surgery, anesthesia was terminated, and the patients who scored <30th percentile of the M-YPAS
neuromuscular blockade was antagonized with atropine and an anxious group that included patients who
(0.015 mg/kg, IV) and neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg, IV). scored >30th percentile of the M-YPAS.[12] The statistical
The awakened patients were transferred to the recovery level of significance for all tests was considered to be
room accompanied by their parents. After recovery, the 0.05.
children were transported to their clinical wards.
Statistical analysis RESULTS
Sample size analysis was performed using G*Power Flow diagram for the study is shown in Figure 1. The
version 3.1.9.2 (G*Power Software, Kiel, Germany). demographic characteristics of patients and parents were
We calculated the sample size with a power of 0.80 and similar between the three groups [Table 1]. No
an of 0.05 as 24 patients for each group to detect 10 significant differences were found in terms of surgical
points difference in M-YPAS scores between the groups. data between the three groups [Table 2].
A control mean M-YPAS score of 50 with an SD of 12
was reported in a previous study.[16] All analyses were Table 2: Surgical data
performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software package Group V Group A Group C P
(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0; IBM Surgery
Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Categorical variables ENT (other) 19 15 7 0.55
were expressed as numbers and percentages, whereas Ear tube insertion 3 5 2
continuous variables were summarized as a mean and Strabismus 4 6 11
standard deviation and as median and range where Dental surgery 2 2 3
appropriate. The normality of distribution for continuous Circumcision 2 3 1
variables was confirmed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Other 3 2 9
test. For comparison of continuous variables between Time of surgery (min)a 50.0±14.3 46.1±14.2 51.9±21.8 0.38
a
One-way ANOVA test was used. Values are presented as number
two groups, the Student’s t-test was used. For or mean±SD. ENT=Ear-nose-throat; ENT
comparison of three groups, the One-way ANOVA or (other)=Adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy and
Kruskal–Wallis test was used depending on whether tonsillectomy; SD=Standard deviation
Table 3: The means of the Modified Yale Table 4: Predictors for postoperative
Preoperative Anxiety Scale and Posthospitalization maladaptive behavioral changes
Behavioral Questionnaire Predictors OR 95% CI P
Group V Group A Group C P M-YPASa 1.03 1.01-1.06 0.002
M-YPAS 27.4±7.1 39.3±19.2 73.1±18.0 <0.001a,b,c Parent gender (female/male)b 4.05 1.39-1.06 0.01
PHBQ 81.4±2.6 82.1±1.8 87.6±3.4 <0.001a,b Agec 0.40 0.13-1.16 0.09
a
P<0.001 for Group C versus Group V; bP<0.001 for a
Anxious children (>30%) compared to less anxious (<30%); bMale
Group C versus Group A; cP<0.001 for Group A versus Group compared to female; c<7 years of age compared to >7 years of age.
V. PHBQ=Posthospitalization Behavioral Questionnaire; OR=Odds ratio; CI=Confidence interval; M-YPAS=Modified Yale
M-YPAS=Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale Preoperative Anxiety Scale
The M-YPAS scores were significantly lower in Group V of all patients, preschool children (<7 years old) had
than Groups C and A (P < 0.001) [Table 3]. When more anxiety (43.0 ± 23.3 vs. 52.3 ± 26.6, P = 0.071).
comparing the three groups, there were no statistically Similarly, the M-YPAS scores of 37 children who
relationships among age, previous surgery, type of underwent a previous surgery were compared with 62
surgery, the education level, and gender of parents on the nonoperated children, nonoperated children had lower
M-YPAS scores. However, on the basis of the evaluation M-YPAS scores (42.2 ± 23.9 vs. 54.0 ± 25.1, P = 0.022).
Table 5: New postoperative maladaptive behavioral Intervention for Preparation of Parents and Children
changes for Outpatient Surgery (WebTIPS) is a web-based
Behavioral changes Calm Anxious preoperative preparation program with features, including
group group information provision, modeling, and coping skills. The
(n=44) (n=55) study showed that WebTIPS reduces the anxiety of
Difficulty about going to bed at night 3 20* children in the preoperative settings.[21] Although both
When left alone for a few minutes, upset 1 11* studies are comprehensive programs and effective on
Need help to do things 1 8*
preoperative anxiety, the cost of these programs is quite
Avoid or afraid of new things 0 6*
expensive. In another study, Batuman et al. concluded
Temper tantrums 2 13*
Negative reaction to doctors or hospitals 2 28*
that informational videos about preoperative preparation
Follow you everywhere around the house 1 8* help to decrease children’s preoperative anxiety.[22]
Sleeping problems 0 19* Unlike our study, they evaluated the effects on the
*P<0.05 between the groups. Anxious children (M-YPAS >30%) preoperative anxiety of only audiovisual presentation.
compared to calm children (M-YPAS <30%). n=Number of The result of these studies shows that an audiovisual
patients; M-YPAS=Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale presentation about preoperative information produces
improved outcomes on children’s anxiety, and it is
The patients in Group C had statistically higher PHBQ considered a low-cost method.
scores than those in Groups A and V (P < 0.001) [Table
3]. For all patients, no correlation was found between A systematic review reported that music therapy might
PHBQ and children’s age, whereas there was a be an ineffective method for coping with anxiety,
correlation between PHBQ and parent gender (P = 0.01). and an audiovisual presentation is more effective
In addition, anxious child (<30th percentile) had 1.03 than music therapy in reducing preoperative anxiety
times greater risk of adopting negative behaviors than a in children.[9] Similar to the findings in our study,
calm child (>30th percentile) [Table 4]. Especially, in preoperative information video has a stronger impact
anxious children, there was a significant correlation on children’s anxiety than an auditory presentation.
between M-YPAS and general anxiety, separation Although both methods include the same information,
anxiety, apathy, and sleep disturbances (P < 0.05), and an audiovisual presentation may be more memorable
the number of new postoperative maladaptive and interesting to children. Since children have broad
behavioral changes is summarized Table 5. imaginations, the mental visualization in an auditory
presentation will be unique for each child. This may
DISCUSSION cause them to misperceive the given information from
The results of the present study showed that audiovisual auditory methods in unfavorable ways and become
presentation related to preanesthetic information in afraid of the upcoming surgery.
children is an effective approach in reducing preoperative In this study, there is no relationship between the
anxiety. Furthermore, children who were informed with children’s age and M-YPAS. This is consistent with
audiovisual and audio presentation had less behavioral the study by Vagnoli et al.[23] Although there was no
changes 1 week after discharge. statistical difference, children under the age of 7 years
In the literature, there are some trials that used were more anxious. Surgery creates a greater emotional
audiovisual presentations for providing information stress in younger children due to poorer comprehension
to patients.[17-19] Gaskey showed that the addition of increased dependency on the mother, less communication
audiovisual presentation to the routine preoperative with the social environment, and decreased the ability to
anesthesia visit did not produce a significant reduction manage anxiety.[24] The study also shows that children
in preoperative anxiety levels in adult patients. without any previous operations had less anxiety. This
However, patients were less nervous and had higher should be noted as preoperative information programs
levels of knowledge about anesthesia procedures. [18] In may adversely affect the emotional status in previously
contrast, the study findings demonstrated exposure to an hospitalized children.[6]
audiovisual presentation significantly reduced anxiety at Risk factors for negative postoperative behavior changes
anesthesia induction. In this regard, Kain et al. stated
have been reported to include the following; preoperative
that behavioral preparation program (ADVANCE:
anxiety, younger age, previous anesthesia experiences,
Anxiety-reduction, Distraction, Video modeling,
premedication, and increased parental anxiety. [1,4] In this
Adding parents, No excessive reassurance, coaching,
study, the children who received a standard information
and exposure/shaping) is efficient in the reduction of
had more PHBQ scores. Similarly, Hilly et al. indicated
children’s anxiety.[20] Similarly, Web-Based Tailored
that workshops for preoperative preparation decrease
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: The content of the audiovisual presentation
The total duration of the video recording was 344 s and it consisted of two sections: Part 1 and 2. Doctors, nurses,
an 11-year-old female, and her mother took part in the video and special permission was received from them to be
recorded. The audiovisual presentation was recorded in the anesthesia clinic and operating room of our hospital.
Part 1: This section is 300 s long and includes the verbal explanation by the anesthesiologist of preoperative
information, anesthesia management, and the postoperative period. Three people were involved in this section: the
anesthesiologist, the child, and her mother. The teddy bear was used as model. The child and her mother visit the
anesthesiologist for preoperative information in the anesthesia clinic. The anesthesiologist meets with them and then
informs them about the surgery and the anesthesia methods. First, the child asks “What is surgery?” and then she
mentions “I am afraid of the pain.” The doctor explains that “You will not be in any pain” and continues by saying,
“The duties of the anesthesiologist are to apply anesthesia to patients, to reduce their pain and ensure their well -being
during operation.” After the child relaxes, the anesthesiologist describes how anesthesia is administered by two
methods. The first method is to insert a small plastic tube into a vessel on the hand and some anesthetic drugs are
administered via the small tube. The anesthesiologist uses a teddy bear for the second method. The doctor explains
“This is a face mask and it smells nice.” She puts a small face mask on the face of the teddy bear and says, “It is
connected to the anesthesia machine by a plastic tube. Anesthetic gases are given through the plastic tube.” The
doctor pretends to tell the teddy bear to take deep breaths and says, “This will help you fall asleep quickly and after
that the surgery will be performed. At the end of surgery, you will be awakened by the administering of some drugs.
Furthermore, I will administer drugs for pain relief.” After explaining anesthesia, the doctor says to the child’s mother
“Your child will be safe and you should not feel restlessness related to the surgery or anesthesia.” The anesthesiologist
explains that preoperative fasting is six hours and postoperative drugs are given regularly. They leave and plan to meet
again the next day for the operation.
Part 2: This section is 44 s long and contains preoperative preparation, anesthesia induction, and a recovery period. The
child and mother come into the operating room with the personnel. The nurse meets them in the preoperative holding
area. The anesthesiologist comes into the preoperative holding area and takes the child and mother into the operating
room. The doctor inserts a device in the child’s finger and explains that “The device measures the amount of oxygen in
the blood.” The doctor performs anesthesia with the face mask and says, “Take deep breaths and have a good sleep.”
After completing the operation, the doctor wakes the child and takes her into the recovery room. The anesthesiologist
talks with the child and mother and leaves from the recovery room.
Abstrak
Anak usia prasekolah menganggap sakit adalah sesuatu hal yang menakutkan. Anak
mempunyai keterbatasan dalam mekanisme koping mengatasi krisis tersebut. Intervensi
audiovisual menonton film kartun merupakan teknik distraksi untuk menurunkan
kecemasan pada anak. Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis pengaruh audiovisual
menonton film kartun terhadap tingkat kecemasan saat prosedur injeksi pada anak
prasekolah. Penelitian ini Pre-experimental dengan jenis pretest and posttest one group
design. Pengambilan data dengan mengunakan teknik purposive sampling pada 28
responden. Variabel independen audiovisual menonton film kartun, sedangkan variabel
dependen tingkat kecemasan. Instrumen yang digunakan SOP dan skala kecemasan HAR-
S. Uji statistik menggunakan uji Paired Sample T-Test, dengan signifikasi p< 0,05. Hasil
analisis statistik didapatkan nilai sig (p = 0.001, t = 11,71) yang berarti ada pengaruh
audiovisual menonton film kartun terhadap tingkat kecemasan saat prosedur injeksi pada
anak prasekolah. Diharapkan intervensi audiovisual menonton film kartun dapat
diterapkan sebagai salah satu intervensi keperawatan untuk menurunkan kecemasan saat
prosedur injeksi pada anak prasekolah.
Kata kunci : Anak Prasekolah, Audiovisual, Kecemasan, Prosedur Injeksi
Abstract
Among preschoolers, illness is a scary thing. Children have limitations in coping
mechanisms to overcome the crisis. Audiovisual intervention in watching cartoons is a
distraction technique to reduce anxiety in children. The purpose of the study was to
analyze the effect of audiovisual cartoon movie on anxiety levels during injection
procedures in preschool children. The design of this study was using Pre-experimental
pretest and posttest one group design. The research collecting the data using purposive
sampling technique on 28 respondents. Independent variable audiovisual watching
cartoons, while dependent variable is anxiety level. The instrument used is SOP and
HAR-S anxiety scale. Statistical tests using the Paired Sample T-Test, with significance p
<0.05. From the results of the statistical analysis, the sig value was obtained (p = 0.001,
t=11.71) which means an audiovisual intervention by on watching cartoons movie was
effective to reduce anxiety levels during the injection procedure in preschool children.
We suggest that audiovisual intervention by watching cartoons movie can be applied as
one of the nursing interventions to reduce anxiety during injection procedures in
preschool children.
Keywords: Anxiety, Audiovisual, Injection Procedure, Preschool Children
15
16 Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan (Journal of Health Sciences), Vol. 12, No. 2, Agustus 2019, Hal. 15-29
hospitalisasi bisa menyebabkan stress. (James, 2010 dalam Saputro H dan Intan
Tetapi kenyataaannya tidak semua anak Fazrin, 2017). Di Indonesia sendiri jumlah
mengalami masa-masa menyenangkan, anak yang dirawat pada tahun 2014
anak juga mengalami sakit yang sebanyak 15,26% (Susenas, 2014). Anak
mengharuskan mereka dirawat di rumah usia prasekolah, anak usia sekolah
sakit (Utami, 2014). Sakit dan merupakan usia rentan terhadap penyakit,
hospitalisasi terjadi pada anak bisa sehingga banyak anak usia tersebut harus
mengakibatkan stress dan kecemasan dirawat di rumah sakit, serta menyebabkan
disemua tingkat usia. Penyebab kecemasan populasi anak yang dirawat di rumah sakit
dipengaruhi oleh banyak faktor, dari mengalami peningkatan sangat dramatis
petugas rumah sakit (dokter, perawat, serta (Wong, 2009).
tenaga kesehatan lainnya), lingkungan Miller (2002) kecemasan anak saat
baru, reaksi keluarga yang mendampingi menjalani hospitalisasi berkisar 10%
anak selama perawatan (Nursalam, dkk, mengalami kecemasan ringan, itu
2013). Seringkali mereka harus menjalani berlanjut, sekitar 2% mengalami kece-
intervensi medis atau tindakan invasive masan berat. Penelitian dilakukan untuk
yang dapat menimbulkan ketakutan pada melihat respon hospitalisasi terjadi anak
anak seperti prosedur injeksi, pengambilan usia 3-12 tahun didapatkan bahwa 77%
atau tes sampel darah, operasi, medikasi anak mengatakan nyeri serta takut saat
dan intervensi keperawatan lainnya. dilakukan pengambilan darah, 63% anak
WHO (2012) bahwa 3-10 % anak mengalami kekakuan otot, 63% anak
dirawat di Amerika Serikat baik anak usia menangis sampai berteriak (Burnsnader,
toddler, prasekolah ataupun anak usia 2014 dalam Carla, 2017). Diperkirakan 35
sekolah, di Jerman sekitar 3 - 7% anak per 100 anak menjalani hospitalisasi 45%
toddler dan 5 - 10% anak prasekolah yang diantaranya mengalami kecemasan saat
menjalani hospitalisasi (Purwandari, 2013 menjalani perawatan di Rumah Sakit
dalam Carla, 2017). UNICEF jumlah anak (Depkes, 2010 dalam Widiatmoko, 2018).
usia prasekolah di 3 negara terbesar dunia Berdasarkan data dari Badan Pusat
mencapai 148 juta, 958 anak dengan Statistik (BPS) Jawa Timur dapat
insiden anak yang dirawat di rumah sakit dijelaskan bahwa anak usia prasekolah dari
57 juta anak setiap tahunnya dimana 75% tahun ke tahun semakin meningkat, data
mengalami trauma berupa ketakutan dan tahun 2013 menunjukkan jumlah anak usia
kecemasan saat menjalani perawatan prasekolah yang ada di Jawa Timur
Lilis Fatmawati, Yuanita Syaiful, Diyah Ratnawati 17
Pengaruh Audiovisual Menonton Film Kartun Terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan Saat Prosedur Injeksi Pada Anak
Prasekolah
pengobatan. Kondisi cemas yang terjadi Audiovisual yang digemari oleh anak-
pada anak akan menghambat dan anak usia prasekolah adalah kartun atau
menyulitkan proses pengobatan yang gambar bergerak, merupakan media yang
berdampak terhadap penyembuhan pada sangat menarik bagi anak-anak terutama
anak sehingga memperpanjang masa rawat anak usia prasekolah yang memiliki daya
dan dapat beresiko terkena komplikasi dari imajinasi tinggi. Anak juga dapat
infeksi nosokomial serta menimbulkan mengeksplorasi perasaan, emosi, dan daya
trauma pada anak. Untuk mengatasi ingat melalui audio visual, audio visual
memburuknya tingkat kecemasan pada juga dapat membantu perawat dalam
anak, seorang perawat dalam memberikan melaksanakan prosedur infus dan injeksi,
intervensi kepada anak harus memudahkan perawat dalam mendistraksi
memperhatikan kebutuhan anak sesuai agar anak kooperatif dalam pelaksanaan
dengan pertumbuhan anaknya. prosedur terapi (Tamsuri, 2007). Cara yang
Beberapa tindakan yang pernah dilakukan yaitu dengan memfokuskan
dilakukan untuk menurunkan tingkat perhatian pada suatu hal yang disukai oleh
kecemasan pada anak antara lain: bermain anak, misalnya menonton film kartun
boneka, bermain clay, bermain puzzle, (Maharezi, 2014 dalam Hapsari 2016).
aktivitas mewarnai, terapi musik, juga Berdasarkan latar belakang di atas, maka
tehnik komunikasi terapeutik, serta tehnik peneliti tertarik melakukan penelitian
pengalihan perhatian (distraksi). tentang pengaruh audiovisual menonton
Kombinasi antara distraksi pendengaran film kartun terhadap tingkat kecemasan
(audio) dan distraksi penglihatan (visual) saat prosedur injeksi pada anak prasekolah.
disebut distraksi audiovisual, yang
digunakan untuk mengalihkan perhatian METODE
pasien terhadap sesuatu yang membuatnya Penelitian ini menggunakan desain pra-
tidak nyaman, cemas atau takut dengan experimental dengan rancang bangun one-
cara menampilkan tayangan favorit berupa grup pra-post test design. Penelitian
gambar-gambar bergerak dan bersuara dilaksanakan pada 5-28 Januari 2019.
ataupun animasi dengan harapan pasien Populasinya adalah seluruh anak usia
asik terhadap tontonannya sehingga prasekolah yang masuk di Ruang Anak
mengabaikan rasa tidak nyaman dan Rumah Sakit Semen Gresik. Pengambilan
menunjukkan respon penerimaan yang sampel menggunakan teknik purposive
baik. sampling, sebanyak 28 responden.
Lilis Fatmawati, Yuanita Syaiful, Diyah Ratnawati 19
Pengaruh Audiovisual Menonton Film Kartun Terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan Saat Prosedur Injeksi Pada Anak
Prasekolah
Tabel 1. Tingkat Kecemasan Sebelum dan Sesudah Intervensi Audiovisual Menonton Film
Kartun Saat Prosedur Injeksi Pada Anak Prasekolah di Ruang Anak Rumah Sakit
Semen Gresik pada tanggal 5-28 Januari 2019
Tabel 2. Pengaruh Audiovisual Terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan Saat Prosedur Injeksi Pada
Anak Prasekolah di Ruang Anak Rumah Sakit Semen Gresik pada tanggal 5-28
Januari 2019
mengalami kecemasan. Hal ini sesuai dengan marah, dan berontak. Demikian
dengan penelitian yang menyatakan bahwa pula disebutkan oleh Stuart (2009) anak
pengalaman hospitalisasi tidak yang dirawat di rumah sakit dengan
berpengaruh terhadap tingkat kecemasan kecemasan yang tinggi memiliki
anak (Stubbe, 2008 dalam Apriliawati, kecenderungan menjadi hiperaktif dan
2011). tidak kooperatif terhadap petugas
Berdasarkan teori dan hasil penelitian kesehatan serta menimbulkan gangguan
yang didapat, terdapat keselarasan dimana psikologik berupa perubahan perilaku
terdapat beberapa faktor yang dapat seperti gelisah, menangis, dan
mempengaruhi tingkat kecemasan pada memberontak.
anak. Pada anak usia prasekolah penyebab 2. Tingkat Kecemasan Sesudah Intervensi
kecemasan berkaitan dengan umur, Audiovisual Menonton Film Kartun
pengalaman dirawat sebelumnya, yang Saat Prosedur Injeksi Pada Anak
dapat menuyebabkan tinggi atau rendahnya Prasekolah
tingkat kecemasannya. Tingkat kecemasan Berdasarkan tabel 1 menunjukkan bahwa
saat prosedur injeksi sebelum intervensi hasil penelitian sesudah dilakukan
audovisual sebagian besar mengalami audiovisual menonton film kartun saat
kecemasan berat 17 responden (60.7%), prosedur injeksi pada anak prasekolah,
dan didapatkan rata-rata skor tertinggi hampir seluruhnya tidak mengalami
pada gejala menangis, merengek, berteriak kecemasan yaitu sebanyak 23 (82.1%).
dan memberontak. Hal ini selaras dengan Penelitian ini sesuai dengan
teori Supartini (2014) dimana anak usia Wahyuningrum (2015) dalam pengaruh
prasekolah menganggap sakit adalah cerita melalui audiovisual terhadap tingkat
sesuatu hal yang menakutkan, kehilangan kecemasan anak usia prasekolah yang
lingkungan yang aman dan penuh kasih mengalami hospitalisasi setelah dilakukan
sayang, serta tidak menyenangkan. Anak intervensi sebagian besar mengalami
menganggap tindakan dan prosedur rumah kecemasan dengan kategori ringan
sakit menyebabkan rasa sakit dan luka di (59.1%). Penelitian Patma (2017) dalam
tubuhnya. penelitiannya tingkat kecemasan setelah
Ketakutan anak muncul karena anak diberikan terapi audiovisual pada pasien
menganggap tindakan dan prosedurnya yang dilakukan pemasangan infus,
mengancam intregitas tubuhnya. Oleh sebagian besar mengalami kecemasan
karena itu, menimbulkan reaksi agresif ringan yaitu 6 responden (66.7%).
66 Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan (Journal of Health Sciences), Vol. 12, No. 2, Agustus 2019, Hal. 15-29
kecemasan terutama saat prosedur injeksi, walaupun anak masih tetap harus di
diantaranya dengan distraksi audiovisual dampingi dan tetap dekat dengan
(Tamsuri, 2007). orangtuanya. Hasil uji analisis statistik
Koller dan Goldman (2012) dalam didapatkan adanya perbedaan tingkat
studinya menyatakan bahwa pemberian kecemasan pada pre test dan post test pada
cerita melalui audiovisual guna menurun- anak yang diberikan audiovisual menonton
kan kecemasan termasuk teknik distraksi film kartun saat prosedur injeksi. Ini
kecemasan dengan teknik audiovisual. berarti bahwa ada pengaruh audiovisual
Perhatian anak yang terfokus kepada cerita menonton film kartun dalam menurunkan
audiovisual yang disimaknya mendis- tingkat kecemasan saat prosedur injeksi
traksikan atau mengalihkan persepsi pada anak prasekolah, baik secara
kecemasan anak dalam korteks serebral. subyekstif maupun obyektif. Hal tersebut
Dengan intervensi audiovisual menonton sesuai dengan teori bahwa salah satu cara
film kartun akan memberikan rangsangan yang dapat dilakukan untuk pengendalian
distraksi berupa visual, auditory dan kecemasan adalah tehnik distraksi
tactile. Perasaan aman dan nyaman yang audiovisual untuk mengalihkan perhatian
dirasakan anak akan merangsang tubuh anak (Tamsuri, 2007, dalam Agustina
untuk mengeluarkan hormon endorphine. 2015). Perhatian anak menjadi teralihkan
Melalui pemberian audiosivisual pada film kartun yang disukai anak, yang
menonton film kartun yang diberikan oleh menyebabkan anak tidak lagi memikirkan
perawat diharapkan dapat membantu anak prosedur injeksi, anak menjadi rileks dan
dalam mengatasi permasalahan dengan nyaman sehingga menurun kecemasannya.
meminta mereka ikut terlibat tentang
kegiatan atau tindakan injeksi yang KESIMPULAN
diberikan oleh petugas sehingga dapat Sebelum diberi intervensi sebagian
membantu membangun pikiran dan responden memiliki kecemasan berat,
kemungkinan dapat menyelesaikan sedangkan sesudah diberi intervensi
masalah yang berhubungan dengan hampir seluruh responden tidak mengalami
penyakit, perpisahan selama dirawat, kecemasan. Sehingga Ada pengaruh
kecacatan dan keterasingan. Hal ini terlihat pemberian audiovisual menonton film
pada saat penelitian anak menjadi fokus kartun terhadap penurunan tingkat
dengan tayangan audiovisual menonton kecemasan saat prosedur injeksi pada anak
film kartun dibandingkan prosedur injeksi, prasekolah.
Lilis Fatmawati, Yuanita Syaiful, Diyah Ratnawati 69
Pengaruh Audiovisual Menonton Film Kartun Terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan Saat Prosedur Injeksi Pada Anak
Prasekolah
Vol. 3 No. 1. Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017). Tsai, C. (2007), ‘The effect of animal
http://jurnal.akfarsam.ac.id/index.php/jl assisted therapy on children’s stress
m_akfarsam/article/view/98 during hospitalization’. Doctoral
Sutrisno, Widodo, G.G, Susanto, H., Disttertasi of Phylosopy. University of
(2017). Kecemasan Anak Usia Sekolah Marylan, School of Nursing.
Sebelum dan Sesudah Mendapatkan Utami, Yuli. (2014). DampakHospitalisasi
Informasi Saat Pemberian Obat Injeksi Terhadap Perkembangan Anak. Jurnal
di RSUD Ambarawa. Journal Ilmu Ilmiah Widya Volume 2, Nomor 2. Hal.
Kesehatan 2 (2) 2017, 99-106. http:// 9-20.
ejournal.stikesaisyah.ac.id/index.php/jik
a/ Wahyuningrum I, (2015). Pengaruh Cerita
Melalui Audiovisual TerhadapTingkat
Stuart, Gail W. (2016). Keperawatan kecemasan Anak Usia Prasekolah Yang
Kesehatan Jiwa. Singapore: Elsevier. Mengalami Hospitalisasi Di RSU PKU
Stubbe, D. A. (2008). A focus on reducing Muhmmadiyah Bantul. Skripi S1
anxiety in children hospitalized for Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan
cancer and diverse pediatric medical STIKES ‘Aisyiyah Yogyakarta. Email:
disease through a self-enganging art fhya091193@gmail.com
therapy. Dissertation. The Faculty of Wong, D. L. et.al. (2009). Buku Ajar
the School of Professional Psychology. Keperawatan Pediatrik, vol 1. Jakarta:
Chestnut Hill Colleege. EGC
Tamsuri. (2007). Konsep dan Yongblut, J.M. (2010). “Alternate Child
Penatalaksanaan Nyeri. Jakarta: EGC Care, History of Hospitalization, And
Townsend, Mary C. (2009), Buku Saku Preschool Child Behavior”. Nurs Res,
Diagnosa Keperawatan pada 48 (1), 29-34.
Keperawatan Keperawatan Psikiatri
Edisi 6. Jakarta: EGC.
ARTICLE IN
+Mo
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
a
Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Ciências da Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
b
Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Departamento de Anestesiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
c
Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
d
Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’’ (UNESP), Departamento de Anestesiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
e
Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’’ (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Departamento
de Anestesiologia, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
Abstract
KEYWORDS
Objective: To verify the effect of psychological preparation on the relief of preoperative anxiety
Child;
in children and to correlate parents’ and children’s levels of anxiety.
Anxiety;
Method: After the approval of the institutional Research Ethics Committee and written consent
Psychologic
of the children’s parents or guardians, 118 children of both genders were prospectively selected,
al
aged between 2 and 8 years, physical condition classification ASA I, who were treated in the
preparation pre-anesthetic evaluation ambulatory of the University Hospital and who underwent ambula-
; tory surgeries at the same hospital. Two controlled groups of 59 children were randomized:
Anesthesia; control group basic preparation and psychological preparation group. On the day of surgery,
Surgery all selected children were evaluated regarding their level of anxiety using the modified Yale
Preoperative Anxiety Scale and their parents were evaluated regarding their level of anxiety
through the Visual Analog Scale. The evaluator was blinded to which study group the child
and family member belonged to.
Results: Nine children and their family members were excluded per group when the results
were analyzed. Children from the prepared group showed significant reductions in their level
of anxiety in relation to the control group (p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the
level of anxiety of children and their parents’ levels (p = 0.78).
6
Please cite this article as: Meletti DP, Meletti JF, Camargo RP, Silva LM, Módolo NS. Psychological preparation reduces preoperative
anxiety in children. Randomized and double-blind trial. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.05.009
66
Study conducted at the Master’s Degree Program of Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail: dpmeletti@gmail.com (D.P. Meletti).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2018.05.009
0021-7557/© 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
2 Meletti DP et al.
Conclusion: The psychological preparation was effective in reducing the level of anxiety of
children. However, there was no relation between the level of anxiety of children and their
parents’ level.
© 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is
an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
4 Meletti DP et al.
Randomized: 110
Allocated to the Basic Preparation Group (BPG): 55 Allocated to the psychological preparation group (PPG): 55
50 children were analyzed for the basic preparation group 50 children were analyzed for the psychological preparation group
Figure 1 Flowchart according to the CONSORT randomization guidelines and participants’ study.
Mann---Whitney test.
40
Values expressed as medians and percentiles (25---75%).
20
1 3 5
7 9 11
single session had their preoperative degree of anxiety sig- Visual Analogue Scale – Anxiety before the surgery
nificantly reduced when compared with the group that did
not receive this care (p = 0.04 for the children and = 0.01 for Figure 2 Correlation between the parents’ anxiety (VAS)
parents at the time of surgery). scale at the time of surgery and the modified Yale Preoper-
The preparation was focused on alleviating separation ative Anxiety Scale (m-YPAS) applied in children. Spearman’s
anxiety in young children. According to the care protocol correlation: p = 0.78.
used at the University Hospital where this study was per-
formed, the parents did not accompany their children during seizures and the fear of separation from parents still
anesthetic induction, and the separation took place at the remain in some children between the ages of 4---8 years.15
toy library attached to the surgical ward. The authors con- In his review article, Moro16 discusses the question of
sider the age limit of 8 years as a predisposing factor to age related to preoperative anxiety and concludes that
this anxiety,15 due to the peculiar fact that children there is still no consensus on the subject. The literature
between 6 months and 4 years of age manifest a greater contains some assertions that younger children, up to 6
intensity of years of age,
ARTICLE IN
+Mo
6 Meletti DP et al.
BACKGROUND: The anxiolytic efficacy of video watching, in the absence of parents, during the mask induction of anest
METHODS: In this prospective trial, 117 children aged 2 to 7 years scheduled for elective minor surgery were randomly a
RESULTS: The mYPAS scores were comparable (P = 0.558), and the number of children exhibit- ing baseline anxiety (an
CONCLUSIONS: Video distraction, parental presence, or their combination showed similar effects on preoperative anxie
P
reschool children undergoing surgery are
room (OR) and the smooth induction of anesthesia without
particularly vulnerable to separation anxiety before
heightened anxiety may be of paramount importance in
anesthesia because they are dependent on their
terms of minimizing perioperative distress and improving
parents and are
behavioral outcome.
old enough to recognize parental absence. 1–3 Furthermore,
Portable multimedia devices, such as smart phones,
the placement of a mask on the face and the inhalation of
tablet computers, and handheld DVD players, are readily
volatile anesthetics in the absence of parents further dis-
available at low cost. Age-appropriate video clips and
tresses young children, sometimes to the extent of refusal
video games are commonly used as effective distraction
of mask induction.1,2,4,5 A more anxious state preoperatively
tools for medical and surgical procedures in children.8,9 In
results in poor cooperation at anesthetic induction and
anesthetic practice, active distraction by a handheld video
may be associated with emergence delirium and negative
game with parental presence was found to be more
behavioral change after surgery.6,7 Therefore, the transfer of effective than pre- medication or parental presence only
children from a preoperative holding area to the operating for reducing anxiety
and improving cooperation during mask induction in chil-
From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeungnam dren aged 4 to 12 years.10 In younger children, whose cog-
University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
nitive and motor development were not advanced enough
Accepted for publication April 15, 2015.
to play interactive video games, passive viewing of an
Funding: This work was funded by Yeungnam University Grant-in-Aid of
2012. animated cartoon also proved a more effective distraction
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. than traditional storytelling, game-playing, nonprocedural
Reprints will not be available from the talking, or humor during mask induction.11 However, pre-
authors. vious studies did not completely control for parental pres-
Address correspondence to Sung Mee Jung, MD, Department of Anesthe- ence or used parents to keep children relaxed during video
siology and Pain Medicine, Yeungnam University School of Medicine, 170, distraction.9–11
Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-703, Republic of Korea. Address e-
mail to applejsm@gmail.com. Thus, we performed this study to determine whether
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society video distraction per se is capable of alleviating
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000839 preoperative
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
778 www.anesthesia-analgesia.org September 2015 • Volume 121 • Number 3
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
anxiety and improving cooperation independent of paren- to 3.0% in 50% oxygen and by IV remifentanil infusion at
tal presence and whether a combination of video distrac- a rate of 0.05 to 0.1 μg/kg/min during surgery. At the end
tion and parental presence is more effective than either of surgery, sevoflurane administration was discontinued,
intervention in preschool children during mask induction and after awakening with adequate spontaneous ventila-
of anesthesia. The primary end point of this study was a tion, children were tracheally extubated and transferred to
change in anxiety level from baseline to induction. In addi- the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Heart rate, Spo2, and
tion, we investigated the effect of each proactive interven- respiratory rate were monitored in the PACU. Parents
tion on postoperative behavioral outcomes, that is, on the were allowed to rejoin their children in the PACU. If a
incidences of emergence delirium and new-onset maladap- child com- plained of pain or exhibited signs or symptoms
tive behavioral changes. of pain, IV fentanyl 1 μg/kg was administered in the
PACU. All clinical management decisions were made by
METHODS the anesthesiologist responsible for the care of the patients.
This prospective, randomized study was approved by the Children’s anxiety levels throughout anesthesia induc-
IRB of Yeungnam University Hospital in South Korea and tion were assessed using the modified Yale Preoperative
was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on the December 30, Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) at 3 time points, that is, while wait-
2013 (NCT02027844). One hundred seventeen children ing in the preoperative holding area (T0; baseline), on
aged between 2 and 7 years, ASA physical status I or II enter- ing the OR (T1), and during mask induction (T2).
scheduled for elective minor surgery under general mYPAS scores are obtained by summing the scores of 22
anesthesia were enrolled. Children with a chronic illness, items in 5 behavioral categories: activity, state of apparent
developmental delay, a neuropsychiatric disease, cancer, arousal, vocalization, emotional expression, and the use of
experience of a recent stressful life event, previous parents.12 In group V, the interaction with the parent was
anesthetic experience, sedative medication, or emergency assessed by slightly modifying the original components of
surgery were excluded. Written informed consent was the “use of parents” because of parental absence.
obtained from parents, and verbal assent was obtained An mYPAS score of >30 indicates the presence of signifi-
from children older than 6 years before the day of surgery. cant anxiety.12 The induction compliance checklist (ICC)
No participant received sedative premedication before was used to assess cooperation during induction.13 Both
anesthesia. After arriving in the preoperative holding area, mYPAS and ICC scores were assessed by a trained
participants were allocated to 1 of the 3 study groups: observer in real time during the perioperative period.
group V (distraction by watching an animated cartoon Before patients were enrolled in this study, the observer
video), group P (parental presence), or group VP (video was trained in how to perform mYPAS and ICC scoring by
distraction plus parental presence), throughout induction reviewing videotapes of children at induction of anesthesia
of anesthesia, using a computer-generated random until 80% agreement with the scores allocated by a
assignment scheme. In group V, children were allowed to psychologist was achieved consistently, as suggested by
select 1 animated cartoon video in a smartphone offered by Sadhasivam et al.14
the researcher or parents and started to watch it with or Parental anxiety was assessed using the Korean version
without parents while wait- ing in the preoperative of Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI),
holding area. Children in group V were separated from which evaluates trait (baseline) and state (situational)
their parents in the preoperative hold- ing area and anxiety.15 In the preoperative holding area, both trait and
transported to the OR. Anesthesia was induced while state anxiety scores were measured to investigate the effect
children continued to view the chosen video. In group P, 1 of parental anxiety on child anxiety. State anxiety scores
parent accompanied the child to the OR and stayed dur- after induction were obtained to assess the effect of the 3
ing the induction of anesthesia, and in group VP, children interventions on situational anxiety changes in parents.
watched a cartoon video with their parents throughout the After surgery, postoperative pain was assessed using
whole anesthesia induction process. the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain (CHEOP)
After arrival in the OR, children were given the choice scale.16 Emergence delirium was evaluated using the
to sit up or lie down on the operating table. All Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale
participants were introduced to the facemask, which was at 10-minute intervals for 30 minutes after arrival in the
detached from the anesthetic circuit, before induction. The PACU.17 When the highest PAED score recorded at any
anesthesiolo- gist explained the anesthesia induction time exceeded 10, emergence delirium was deemed to be
process to children and gently asked them to breathe present. An investigator, unaware of group assignments,
deeply. A pulse oximeter and electrocardiogram were used con- tacted parents and requested that they complete the
for continuous monitor- ing during induction. Anesthesia Post- Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire (PHBQ) at 1
was induced by mask inhalation with incrementing and 14 days postoperatively by phone. The PHBQ contains
sevoflurane up to 8% with N2O (4 L/min) and oxygen (2 27 items in 6 categories: general anxiety, separation
L/min). The anesthesiologist carefully positioned the anxiety, anxiety about sleep, eating disturbance,
facemask/anesthesia circuit so as not to interfere with
aggression toward author- ity, and apathy/withdrawal.18
video watching or the parent. When a participant closed
Negative behavioral change development after anesthesia
his/her eyes and failed to respond to his/her name, the
and surgery was recorded. Both CHEOP and PAED
video was discontinued and the parent was escorted out of
scores and PHBQ interviews were performed by an
the OR by a nurse. Noninvasive arte- rial blood pressure
independent observer unaware of group
was measured as soon as possible. After endotracheal assignments.
intubation, anesthesia was maintained by sevoflurane Power analysis was conducted using G*Power ver.
inhalation at an end-tidal concentration of 1.5% 3.1.5. An effect size of 0.31 was estimated from the
variance of
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
September 2015 • Volume 121 • Number 3 www.anesthesia-analgesia.org 779
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Video Distraction and Parental Presence in Children
Eligibilit
y (n =
125)
Randomization (n = 117)
Group V Group P
(n = 39) (n = 39)
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants.
Group VP Group V = video distraction; group
Withdrawal of consent (n = 3) Withdrawal of consent (n = 2) (n = 39) P = parental presence; group VP = com-
bination of video distraction and parental
Incomplete data (n = 2) Noncompliance to protocol
presence.
(n = 2)
Withdrawal of consent (n = 1)
Loss of follow-up (n = 2)
Loss of follow-up (n = 1)
Completion of the study (n = 34) Completion of the study (n = 33) Completion of the study (n = 37)
Data analysis
(n = 104)
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
780 www.anesthesia-analgesia.org ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Anesthesiologist physical status.
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Video Distraction and Parental Presence in Children
d
One-way ANOVA.
Increase
No increase Table 3. Group Differences for Proportions with
50 Increased Anxiety from Baseline to Operating
Room Entry and Induction of Anesthesia
T0T1 T0T2
40 T0T1 T0T2
95% CI of 95% CI of
mYPAS proportion proportion
* change differences P differences P
30 Group P to 2 to 49 0.009* −9 to 44 0.112
group V
Number of
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
782 www.anesthesia-analgesia.org ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Table 4. Postoperative Emergence Delirium and Negative Behavioral Changes in Children
Group V Group P Group VP
(n = 34) (n = 33) (n = 37) P
Awakening time (min) 9.0 ± 3.9 12.2 ± 7.0 10.7 ± 5.0 0.056
CHEOP score 7.0 (6.0–8.3) 8.0 (6.5–9.5) 9.0 (7.0–10.0)* 0.041
Peak PAED score 7.9 ± 6.3 8.0 ± 5.5 9.3 ± 6.0 0.517
Emergence delirium, n (%) 13 (38.2) 13 (39.4) 20 (43.5) 0.324
Negative PHBC, n (%)
≥1
1d 17 (50.0) 19 (57.6) 15 (40.5) 0.354
2 wk 7 (21.2) 5 (15.2) 3 (5.2) 0.299
≥4
1d 1 (2.9) 1 (3.0) 4 (11.4) 0.224
2 wk 2 (6.1) 1 (3.0) 0 0.551
Values are median (interquartile ranges) or mean ± SD for continuous variables and number of patients (%) for categorical variables.
V = video distraction; P = parental presence; VP = combination of video distraction and parental presence; CHEOP = Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain
Scale; PAED = Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale; PHBC = post-hospital behavior change.
*Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.017 versus group V.
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Video Distraction and Parental Presence in Children
was lacking in group V. Although we matched children’s 4. Przybylo HJ, Tarbell SE, Stevenson GW. Mask fear in children
responses in group V with the components of the use of presenting for anesthesia: aversion, phobia, or both? Paediatr
par- ents, this may have affected the psychometric integrity Anaesth 2005;15:366–70
of the mYPAS. Finally, the inability to relate the anxiolytic 5. Fortier MA, Del Rosario AM, Martin SR, Kain ZN.
Perioperative anxiety in children. Paediatr Anaesth
effects of video distraction and parental presence on the 2010;20:318–22
short- and long-term postoperative behavioral outcomes in 6. Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, McClain B, Gaal
children may be related to sample size. We calculated D, Mayes LC, Feng R, Zhang H. Preoperative anxiety and
sample size based on a change in anxiety levels from emergence delirium and postoperative maladaptive behaviors.
Anesth Analg 2004;99:1648–54
baseline to induction of anesthesia, the primary end point
7. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Karas DE,
of this study, and thus, the number of children recruited McClain BC. Preoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, and
may have been insufficient to detect the effects of the 3 behavioral recovery in young children undergoing surgery.
different interventions on postop- erative behavioral Pediatrics 2006;118:651–8
changes. 8. Low DK, Pittaway AP. The ‘iPhone’ induction—a novel use
for the Apple iPhone. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:573–4
In conclusion, we found that video distraction, parental 9. Burk CJ, Benjamin LT, Connelly EA. Distraction anesthe-
presence, or combination of both interventions had a simi- sia for pediatric dermatology procedures. Pediatr Dermatol
lar effect on preoperative anxiety during inhaled induction 2007;24:419–20
of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes such 10. Patel A, Schieble T, Davidson M, Tran MC, Schoenberg C,
Delphin E, Bennett H. Distraction with a hand-held video
as emergence delirium and new-onset negative behavioral game reduces pediatric preoperative anxiety. Paediatr
changes in preschool children. A further large-scale study Anaesth 2006;16:1019–27
is required to determine the ability of video distraction to 11. Mifflin KA, Hackmann T, Chorney JM. Streamed video clips
to reduce anxiety in children during inhaled induction of
improve postoperative behavioral outcomes. E anesthe- sia. Anesth Analg 2012;115:1162–7
12. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Cicchetti DV, Bagnall AL, Finley JD,
DISCLOSURES Hofstadter MB. The Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale: how
Name: Hyuckgoo Kim, MD. does it compare with a “gold standard”? Anesth Analg
Contribution: This author helped design and conduct the 1997;85:783–8
study, acquire the data, review and analyze the data, and draft 13. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Wang SM, Caramico LA, Hofstadter
MB. Parental presence during induction of anesthesia versus
and revise the manuscript. sedative premedication: which intervention is more effective?
Attestation: Hyuckgoo Kim has seen the original study data, Anesthesiology 1998;89:1147–56
reviewed the analysis of the data, and approved the final 14. Sadhasivam S, Cohen LL, Hosu L, Gorman KL, Wang Y,
manuscript. Nick TG, Jou JF, Samol N, Szabova A, Hagerman N, Hein
Name: Sung Mee Jung, MD. E, Boat A, Varughese A, Kurth CD, Willging JP, Gunter JB.
Contribution: This author helped design and conduct the Real-time assessment of perioperative behaviors in children
and parents: development and validation of the periopera-
study, acquire data, analyze and interpret the data, draft and
tive adult child behavioral interaction scale. Anesth Analg
revise the manuscript, and is the corresponding author. 2010;110:1109–15
Attestation: Sung Mee Jung has seen the original study data, 15. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene PR, Vagg PR, Jacobs
reviewed the analysis of the data, approved the final manu- GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form
script, and is the archival author. Y) (“Self-Evaluation Questionnaire”). Palo Alto, CA:
Name: Hwarim Yu, MD. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1983
16. McGrath PJ, Johnson G, Goodman JT, Schillinger J, Dunn
Contribution: This author helped design and conduct the J, Chapman J. CHEOPS: A Behavioral Scale for Rating
study, acquire the data, and prepare the manuscript. Postoperative Pain in Children. New York, NY: Raven Press,
Attestation: Hwarim Yu has seen the original study data and 1985
approved the final manuscript. 17. Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evalu-
Name: Sang-Jin Park, MD, PhD. ation of the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium scale.
Contribution: This author helped design the study, analyze Anesthesiology 2004;100:1138–45
and interpret the data, and revise the data. 18. Vernon DT, Schulman JL, Foley JM. Changes in children’s
behavior after hospitalization. Some dimensions of response
Attestation: Sang-Jin Park has seen the original study data, and their correlates. Am J Dis Child 1966;111:581–93
analyzed and interpreted the data, and approved the final 19. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between
manuscript. independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat
This manuscript was handled by: James A. DiNardo, MD. Med 1998;17:873–90
20. Lee J, Lee J, Lim H, Son JS, Lee JR, Kim DC, Ko S. Cartoon dis-
traction alleviates anxiety in children during induction of
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS anes- thesia. Anesth Analg 2012;115:1168–73
The authors thank Ji Eun Jang, Department of Statistics, 21. Wright KD, Stewart SH, Finley GA. When are parents helpful?
Yeungnam University, for assistance with statistical analysis. A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of parental presence
for pediatric anesthesia. Can J Anaesth 2010;57:751–8
REFERENCES 22. Kain ZN, Wang SM, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, Hofstadter MB.
1. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, O’Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV. Preoperative Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative
anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr behavioral outcomes. Anesth Analg 1999;88:1042–7
Adolesc Med 1996;150:1238–45 23. Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Maranets I, Nelson W,
2. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, Silver D, Spieker M, Mayes LC. Predicting which child-parent pair will benefit
Nygren MM, Anderson G, Rimar S. Parental presence during from paren- tal presence during induction of anesthesia: a
induction of anesthesia. A randomized controlled trial. decision-making approach. Anesth Analg 2006;102:81–4
Anesthesiology 1996;84:1060–7 24. Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA, Mayes LC, Weinberg
3. Vetter TR. The epidemiology and selective identification of ME, Wang SM, MacLaren JE, Blount RL. Family-centered
children at risk for preoperative anxiety reactions. Anesth preparation for surgery improves perioperative outcomes
Analg 1993;77:96–9 in children: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology
2007;106:65–74
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
784 www.anesthesia-analgesia.org ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA
Copyright © 2015 International Anesthesia Research Society. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari
Volume 3, Nomor 1, Desember 2019
e-ISSN: 2581-1975
p-ISSN: 2597-7482
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/jks.v3i1.837
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini ialah menganalisis pengaruh video kartun dan video animasi
terhadap penurunan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi pada anak usia pra sekolah. Metode
penelitian ini menggunakan quasi eksperimental dengan pendekatan pre and post-
test without control. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penurunan tingkat
kecemasan pre operasi pada anak usia pra sekolah setelah diberikan intervensi video
kartun sebesar 4,20, setelah diberikan intervensi video animasi sebesar 4,70 dan setelah
diberikan intervensi kombinasi antara video kartun+video animasi sebesar 7,20.
Berdasarkan hal tersebut, tingkat kecemasan pre operasi menggunakan intervensi
kombinasi video kartun+video animasi menunjukkan penurunan paling besar. Hasil
penelitian juga didapatkan p value > 0,000. Simpulan, adanya pengaruh video kartun
dan video animasi terhadap penurunan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi pada anak usia pra
sekolah.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of cartoon videos and animated
videos on reducing preoperative anxiety levels in pre-school age children. This
research method uses quasi-experimental with a pre and post-test approach with out
control. The results showed that the reduction in preoperative anxiety levels in pre-
school children after being given a cartoon video intervention by 4.20, after being given
an animated video intervention by 4.70 and after being given a combination
intervention between cartoon videos + animated videos by 7.20. Based on this, the level
of preoperative anxiety using a cartoon video + animated video combination
intervention showed the greatest decrease. The results of the study also obtained p
value> 0,000. Conclusions, the influence of cartoon videos and animated videos on the
reduction of preoperative anxiety levels in pre-school age children.
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
PENDAHULUAN
Anak usia pra sekolah merupakan anak yang berusia 3 sampai 5 tahun yang
memiliki kemampuan berinteraksi dengan sosial dan lingkungannya sebagai tahap
menuju perkembangan selanjutnya (Astarani, 2017). Anak usia pra sekolah memiliki
resiko besar untuk mengalami masalah kesehatan jika dikaitkan dengan respon imun
dan kekuatan pertahanan dirinya yang belum optimal (Papalia, et al, 2010). Alini (2017)
juga menyatakan bahwa pada masa usia pra sekolah aktifitas anak yang meningkat
menyebabkan anak kelelahan dan menjadikan anak rentan terhadap penyakit akibat
daya tahan tubuh yang lemah sehingga anak diharuskan menjalani hospitalisasi,
termasuk operasi.
Menurut Utami (2014) anak merupakan populasi yang sangat rentan terutama saat
menghadapi situasi yang membuat stress. Hal ini dikarenakan kondisi koping yang
digunakan oleh orang dewasa belum berkembang sempurna pada anak-anak. Anak usia
prasekolah menerima keadaaan masuk rumah sakit dengan rasa ketakutan. Jika anak
sangat ketakutan dapat menampilkan perilaku agresif, dari menggigit, menendang-
nendang bahkan berlari ke luar ruangan.
Tindakan operasi merupakan hal yang sangat beresiko. Lebih dari 230 juta operasi
mayor dilakukan setiap tahun di dunia yang menyebabkan keadaan pasien saat operasi
akan lemah, meningkatkan komplikasi setelah operasi dilakukan bahkan dapat
menyebabkan kematian (Priece, Moreno, 2012). Tindakan operasi memerlukan sebuah
tindakan keperawatan pre operasi yang merupakan tahapan awal dari keperawatan
operatif yang dimulai sejak pasien diterima masuk di ruang terima pasien dan berakhir
ketika pasien dipindahkan ke meja operasi untuk dilakukan tindakan pembedahan
(Wijayanti, 2011). Salah satu persiapan pre operasi ialah persiapan mental/psikis.
Persiapan mental merupakan hal yang tidak kalah pentingnya dalam proses
persiapan operasi karena mental pasien yang tidak siap atau labil dapat berpengaruh
terhadap kondisi fisiknya dan kelancaran proses operasi. Perawat perlu mengkaji
mekanisme koping pasien dalam menghadapi stres, dimana tindakan operasi merupakan
salah satu keadaan pemicu kecemasan dan stress pada pasien terutama pada pasien anak
(Sjamsuhidajat, De Jong, 2010). Terdapat sekitar 50%-70% dari anak-anak yang
menjalani operasi mengalami kecemasan dan kesusahan yang parah sebelum operasi
(Alini, 2017).
Kecemasan merupakan suatu kondisi yang tidak menyenangkan yang dapat
mempengaruhi perilaku pasien yang melakukan perawatan (Gracia, 2012). Kecemasan
dental pada pasien anak usia 6-8 tahun biasanya timbul karena belum adanya
pengalaman ke dokter gigi. Kecemasan dental pada anak tersebut menyebabkan anak
sering menunda bahkan menolak untuk dilakukan perawatan di dokter gigi yang juga
mengakibatkan betambah parahnya kondisi kesehatan gigi dan mulut pada anak
(Rehatta dkk, 2014). Kecemasan pada tindakan dental disebabkan oleh banyak hal, di
antaranya penggunaan alat dental yang dimasukan secara berurutan dan bergantian ke
mulut dan suara yang ditimbulkan dari alat-alat tersebut (Gracia, 2012). Setiap orang
menunjukkan tanda-tanda kecemasan berbeda-beda, di antaranya ditandai dengan
meningkatnya denyut nadi (Pontoh dkk, 2015). Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Collip’s,
menyatakan bahwa terjadi peningkatan denyut nadi pada saat anak diberikan tindakan
medis (Stuart, Laira, 2005).
Kecemasan yang dialami anak usia pra sekolah jika tidak segera ditangani akan
mengakibatkan tubuh menghasilkan hormon yang menyebabkan kerusakan pada
seluruh tubuh termasuk menurunkan kemampuan sistem imun (Putra, 2011). Anak yang
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
mengalami cemas juga cenderung menolak perawatan dan pengobatan yang sedang
dijalani (tidak kooperatif). Anak yang tidak kooperatif akibat kecemasan akan
menyebabkan terjadinya delay terhadap tindakan operasi yang akan dilakukan.
Hasil studi pendahuluan di ruang rawat inap RS Islam A. Yani Surabaya melalui
wawancara dengan perawat ruang anak didapatkan data bahwa 4 dari 5 perawat ruangan
mengalami kesulitan dalam menghadapi pasien anak yang akan menjalani operasi. Anak
cenderung melakukan penolakan saat perawat akan mengukur tanda-tanda vital,
menginjeksi obat atau mengganti cairan infus. Hal lain juga dikemukakan oleh perawat
bedah RS Islam A. Yani Surabaya yaitu untuk melakukan tindakan operasi pada pasien
anak cenderung membutuhkan waktu yang sedikit lebih lama daripada pasien dewasa.
Mereka perlu menunggu hingga anak berhenti menangis dan mau untuk didekati
perawat. Kecemasan ini memberikan dampak negatif jangka panjang pada anak-anak
terhadap tindakan medis di kemudian hari. Kecemasan pre operasi pada anak usia pra
sekolah ini perlu diatasi dengan melakukan persiapan psikologis berbasis caring dan
diharapkan dapat menurunkan kecemasan pre operasi pada anak usia pra sekolah seperti
teori model keperawatan yang digambarkan oleh Kristen Swanson dalam teori caring.
Perawat memerlukan teknik komunikasi terapeutik yang efektif dalam setiap
tindakan yang akan diberikan kepada klien, selain itu diperlukan pula teknik non
farmakologis agar anak dapat bersikap kooperatif misalnya dengan teknik distraksi
(pengalihan) (Prasetyo, 2010). Salah satu teknik distraksi yang bisa dilakukan pada anak
adalah menonton kartun animasi (Wong, 2009). Ketika anak lebih fokus pada kegiatan
mononton film kartun, hal tersebut mengakibatkan impuls nyeri yang disebabkan
adanya cedera tidak mengalir melalui tulang belakang, pesan nyeri tidak tersampaikan
ke otak sehingga anak tidak merasakan nyeri (Brannon, 2013)
Terdapat beberapa macam persiapan psikologis guna mengurangi kecemasan pre
operasi pada anak pra sekolah, salah satunya ialah teknik non-farmakologi, seperti
kehadiran orang tua, musik, akupunktur, terapi bermain, bermain dengan mainan yang
sudah dikenal, dan menonton kartun (Potter, Perry, 2012). Amerika Academy of
Pediatrics merekomendasikan beberapa cara untuk mengurangi kecemasan dan
membantu anak-anak mengatasi stres rawat inap dan operasi, yaitu dengan pemberian
informasi, pendidikan kesehatan, dan membina hubungan saling percaya dengan anak-
anak dan orang tua mereka dengan menggunakan beberapa alat, seperti gambar,
diagram, boneka, orientasi tour area operasi atau ruang perawatan (Brown, 2012).
METODE PENELITIAN
Penelitian ini menggunakan desain quasi eksperimental dengan pendekatan pre
and post-test without control. Populasi yang digunakanadalam penelitian ini adalah
anak usia pra sekolah yang akan menjalani operasi di RS Islam A. Yani Surabaya.
Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling. Sampel dalam
penelitian ini ialah anak yang akan menjalani operasi di RS Islam A. Yani Surabaya
yakni sebanyak 30 anak yang dibagi menjadi 3 kelompok. Proses pengambilan data
dilakukan selama empat bulan. Instrumen yang digunakan ialah kuesioner HARS untuk
mengukur kecemasan anak usia pra sekolah.
Kriteria inklusi pada penelitian ini diantaranya anak usia 3-5 tahun, anak
menjalani rawat inap di rumah sakit minimal 1 hari sebelum jadwal operasi, anak yang
akan menjalani operasi sedang dan orang tua bersedia anak menjadi responden. Untuk
kriteria ekslusi pada penelitian ini adalah anak yang dilakukan operasi cito, anak yang
memiliki kelainan konginetal dan penyakit lainnya seperti sindrom down, tuna netra,
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
dan sebagainya, serta kondisi anak sangat lemah sehingga tidak memungkinkan untuk
menonton video.
Penentuan kelompok kartun, animasi dan video+animasi dilakukan dengan cara
acak. Anak dengan jadwal operasi awal akan masuk dalam kelompok video kartun, anak
kedua akan masuk dalam kelompok video animasi, anak ketiga akan masuk dalam
kelompok video kartun+animasi, dan anak keempat akan masuk ke dalam kelompok
video kartun, begitu seterusnya. Sebelum dilakukan proses pengambilan data, orang tua
calon responden diberikan informasi tentang penelitian yang akan dilakukan,
keuntungan dan dampak yang mungkin dapat ditimbulkan selama proses penelitian, bila
orang tua calon responden menyetujuinya maka dilanjutkan dengan pengisian lembar
persetujuan menjadi responden. Kemudian dilakukan pengukuran kecemasan anak
sebelum intervensi menggunakan skala HARS 40 menit sebelum anak dibawa ke ruang
operasi.
Pada kelompok video kartun, anak diberi kesempatan memilih salah satu kartun
(bobo boy, tayo the little bus dan marsha and the bear) kemudian dilakukan pemutaran
video kartun selama 15 menit. Pada kelompok video animasi, dilakukan pemutaran
video animasi selama 15 menit. Pada kelompok kombinasi video kartun+video animasi,
anak diberi kesempatan memilih salah satu kartun (bobo boy, tayo the little bus dan
marsha and the bear) kemudian dilakukan pemutaran video kartun 15 menit dan video
animasi 15 menit. Setelah pemutaran video dilakukan pengukuran kecemasan anak
setelah dilakukan intervensi menggunakan skala HARS 5 menit sebelum anak masuk ke
ruang operasi.
HASIL PENELITIAN
Tabel. 1
Distribusi Frekuensi Responden (n=30)
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
Tabel 1 menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar anak berjenis kelamin laki-laki. Pada
data riwayat operasi, seluruh responden belum memiliki riwayat operasi sebelumnya
yang artinya semua responden baru pertama kali menjalani operasi.
Tabel. 2
Distribusi Frekuensi Tingkat Kecemasan Sebelum Intervensi
Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin (n=30)
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
Tabel di atas juga menunjukkan bahwa pada kelompok anak dengan intervensi
kombinasi video kartun+video animasi terjadi penurunan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi
sebesar 7,20. Hasil uji statistik didapatkan nilai p value = 0,000 dengan derajat
kepercayaan 95% (5,947-8,453), sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada perbedaan
antara tingkat kecemasan pre operasi anak sebelum dan setelah diberikan intervensi
kombinasi video kartun+video animasi.
Berdasarkan penjelasan di atas, dapat diketahui bahwa penurunan tingkat
kecemasan pre operasi anak setelah diberikan video kartun lebih kecil daripada
penurunan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi anak setelah diberikan video animasi. Maka,
pemberian video animasi lebih efektif daripada video kartun dalam menurunkan tingkat
kecemasan pre operasi pada anak usia pra sekolah.
Untuk penurunan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi anak setelah diberikan video
kartun juga lebih kecil daripada penurunan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi anak setelah
diberikan kombinasi video kartun+video animasi. Maka, kombinasi video kartun+video
animasi lebih efektif daripada video kartun dalam menurunkan tingkat kecemasan pre
operasi pada anak usia pra sekolah. Untuk penurunan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi
anak setelah diberikan video animasi lebih kecil daripada penurunan tingkat kecemasan
pre operasi anak setelah diberikan kombinasi video kartun+video animasi. Maka,
kombinasi video kartun+video animasi lebih efektif daripada video animasi dalam
menurunkan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi pada anak usia pra sekolah.
Berdasarkan, ketiga intervensi di atas dapat disimpulkan bahwa intervensi
kombinasi video kartun+video animasi memiliki penurunan yang paling besar daripada
dua intervensi yang lain, sehingga intervensi kombinasi video kartun+video animasi
lebih direkomendasikan untuk digunakan dalam menurunkan tingkat kecemasan pre
operasi anak usia pra sekolah.
PEMBAHASAN
Jenis Kelamin
Hasil analisis didapatkan bahwa anak laki-laki yang termasuk dalam kecemasan
sedang ialah sebanyak 17 anak dan tidak ada yang termasuk dalam kecemasan berat,
sedangkan pada anak perempuan yang termasuk dalam kecemasan sedang ialah
sebanyak 9 anak dan yang termasuk dalam kecemasan berat sebanyak 4 anak. Potter,
Perry (2012) menyebutkan bahwa salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi kecemasan
ialah jenis kelamin. Kecemasan lebih sering terjadi pada anak perempuan dibandingkan
anak laki-laki.
Hal ini karena laki-laki lebih aktif dan eksploratif sedangkan perempuan lebih
sensitif dan banyak menggunakan perasaan. Pada perempuan juga lebih mudah
dipengaruhi oleh tekanan-tekanan lingkungan daripada laki-laki, kurang sabar dan
mudah menggunakan air mata. Mudatsir (2010) menyatakan bahwa anak harus
mendapatkan penanganan medis dan tindakan operasi di rumah sakit yang mampu
menimbulkan kecemasan akan suasana rumah sakit.
Riwayat Operasi
Hubungan riwayat operasi dengan tingkat kecemasan pre operasi anak usia pra
sekolah dalam penelitian ini tidak dapat dianalisis karena semua responden belum
pernah menjalani operasi sehingga kali ini merupakan pengalaman pertamanya. Maka,
perlu adanya penelitian yang menggunakan responden yang variatif. Menurut Supartini
(2013) anak yang baru mengalami perawatan di rumah sakit akan berisiko
menimbulkan
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
perasaan cemas yang ditimbulkan baik oleh anak maupun orang tua. Berbagai kejadian
dapat menimbulkan dampak atraumatik terutama pada anak yang baru pertama kali
mengalami perawatan di rumah sakit, salah satunya karena adanya pengalaman interaksi
yang tidak baik dengan petugas kesehatan.
Hockberry, Wilson (2010) juga menyebutkan bahwa anak yang mempunyai
pengalaman sebelumnya akan mulai membentuk respon koping dibandingkan dengan
anak yang belum mempunyai pengalaman. Hal ini disebabkan karena anak yang pernah
dirawat sebelumnya di rumah sakit yang sama akan merasa lebih terbiasa dibandingkan
dengan yang baru pertama kali dirawat serta anak akan merespon sakitnya dengan lebih
positif. Hal ini juga didukung oleh Pelander, Leino-Kilpi (2010) menyebutkan bahwa
semakin sering anak berhubungan dengan rumah sakit maka semakin kecil bentuk
kecemasan atau sebaliknya.
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
SIMPULAN
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan rata-
rata tingkat kecemasan pre operasi anak sebelum dan setelah diberikan video kartun (p
value = 0,000, selisih = 4,20), setelah diberikan video animasi (p value = 0,000, selisih
= 4,70), dan setelah diberikan kombinasi video kartun+video animasi (p value = 0,000,
selisih = 7,20).
33
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
SARAN
Perawat diharapkan dapat menerapkan pemberian kombinasi video kartun+video
animasi untuk anak usia pra sekolah yang akan menjalani operasi. Intervensi ini
merupakan salah satu tindakan atraumatic care berbasis caring. Bagi peneliti
selanjutnya diharapkan dapat mempertimbangkan jumlah sampel yang lebih besar,
karakteristik responden yang lebih variatif dari sisi pengalaman operasi sebelumnya,
jenis operasi yang sama dan penggunaan instrumen lain untuk mengukur tingkat
kecemasan pada anak.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Alini, A. (2017). Pengaruh Terapi Bermain Plastisin (Playdough) terhadap Kecemasan
Anak Usia Pra Sekolah (3-6 Tahun) yang Mengalami Hospitalisasi di Ruang
Perawatan Anak RSUD Bangkinang. Jurnal Ilmu Kedokteran, 1(2), 4-7
Astarani, K. (2017). Hospitalisasi & Tempat Bermain pada Anak. Adjie Media
Nusantara, Nganjuk
Brannon, L., Feist, J., & Updegraff, J. A. (2013). Health Psychology: An Introduction to
Behavior and Health, Eight Edition. USA: Wadsworth
Brown, J. (2012). Effects of Group Medical Play on Reducing Stress, Fear, and Anxiety
in Children. Master’s thesis The University of Alabama
Ekawati, D., Rosyidah, I., Sumarsono. (2017). Pengaruh Distraksi Menonton Animasi
Kartun terhadap Tingkat Stress Hospitalisasi pada Anak Saat Dilakukan Injeksi
Bolus. Skripsi. Stikes Insan Cendekia Medika Jombang
Fatmawati, L., Syaiful, Y., & Ratnawati, D. (2019). Pengaruh Audiovisual Menonton
Film Kartun terhadap Tingkat Kecemasan saat Prosedur Injeksi pada Anak
Prasekolah. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan (Journal of Health Sciences), 12(2), 15-29
Gracia, Mia. (2015). Hypnosis In Destistry. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Hockenberry, J. M. & Wilson D. (2010). Wong’s essentials of pediatric nursing. Mosby
Elsevier, Philadelphia
Koller & Goldman. (2012). Pediatric Psychosocial Oncology: Textbook for
Multidisciplinary Care, USA: Springer
Lee, J., Jihye L.S., Hyungsun L. S., & Jun-Rae L. (2012). Cartoon Distraction
Alleviates Anxiety in Children during Induction of Anesthesia. International
Anesthesia Research Society, 115(5), 1168-1173
Mudatsir. (2010). Spiritual Emotional Freedom Technique dan Nyeri Pasien Pasca
Operasi Fraktur Femur. Jurnal Terpadu Ilmu Kesehatan, 45-49
Noorlaila, I. (2010). Panduan Lengkap Mengajar PAUD. Yogyakarta: Pinus Book
Publisher
Papalia, D. E., Sally, W. O., & Ruth, D. F. (2010). Human Development (Psikologi
Perkembangan) Bag. I-IV. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
Pelander & Leino. K. (2010). Empirical Studies: Children’s Best and Worst
Experiences during Hospitalization. Finland Scand Journal Caring Sci, 12(4),
347-356
Pontoh, B. I., Damajanti, H.C.P, & Ni Wayan, M., 2015. Hubungan Tingkat Kecemasan
dengan Perubahan Denyut Nadi Pada Pasien Ekstraksi Gigi di Puskesmas
Tuminting Manado, Jurnal e-GiGi, 3(1): 13-17
Prasetyo, S. N. (2010). Konsep dan Proses Keperawatan Nyeri. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu
Potter & Perry. (2012). Fundamental of Nursing. Jakarta: Salemba Medika
Priece & Moreno. (2012). At a Glance Ilmu Bedah. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: EGC
34
2019. Jurnal Keperawatan Silampari 3 (1) 332-
34