we write a research
methodology?
W I DYA
R A H M AWAT I
Observasional
Cohort
Case control
Desain
Randomized
Control Trial
Intervensi
Community
Based Field
Trial
Observational Study:
Cross Sectional Study (Survey)
3
With outcomes
Subjects
selected for the
study
Without
outcomes
Time
Onset of study
Exposed
Cases
Unexposed
Exposed
Controls
Unexposed
Onset of study
Time
With outcomes
Without
outcomes
Cohort selected
for study
Unexposed or
controls
Onset of study
With outcomes
Without
outcomes
Time
Observational Study:
Cohort Study Retrospective*
Exposed or
subjects
With outcomes
Without
outcomes
Records selected
for study
With outcomes
Unexposed or
controls
Without
outcomes
Onset of study
Time
Jenis Penelitian
Tujuan
Penelitian
Proses
Pengkajian
(waktu)
Penggunaan
statistika
Deskriptif
Sesaat (cross
sectional)
Deskriptif
Quantitative
Eksploratif
Prospektif
Komparatif
Qualitative
Retrospektif
Asosiatif/
korelasional
Gabungan
antara quanti
& qualitative
Analitik
Jenis Penelitian
(menurut tujuan penelitian)
8
Uji instrumen
Nutrition anthropology
DESKRIPTIF
Polling/survey opini
Penelusuran sejarah
Studi kasus
ANALITIK
Eksperimental
Observasional
4/27/15
Jenis Penelitian
(menurut proses pengkajian)
9
CROSS SECTIONAL/SESAAT
Mengetahui gambaran/karakteristik/keadaan suatu
peristiwa/subyek saat penelitian dilaksanakan
PROSPEKTIF
Mengkaji proses perkembangan suatu peristiwa sejak
sebelum terjadi sampai selesai
RETROSPEKTIF
Mengkaji perkembangan suatu peristiwa setelah
peristiwa tersebut terjadi, kemudian ditelusuri kembali
ke belakang
4/27/15
Jenis Penelitian
(menurut penggunaan statistika)
10
DESKRIPTIF
Mengetahui gambaran karakteristik subyek pada suatu
daerah/pada suatu waktu tertentu
KOMPARATIF
Membandingkan karakteristik atau distribusi (mean,
proporsi, rasio) antara 2 populasi (kelompok
subyek)/lebih
ASOSIATIF/KORELASIONAL
Mengukur/membuktikan adanya hubungan antara 2
variabel atau lebih
4/27/15
Jenis Penelitian
(menurut jenis data & cara penyajian)
11
QUANTITATIVE
QUALITATIVE
Gabungan antara Qualitative & Quantitative
4/27/15
Observational Study
Descriptive Study
Analytic Study
Descriptive Study/
Case Study
Cohort Study
(Prospective/Retrospective)
Cross-sectional Study
Intervention Study
Randomized Controlled
Trial (RCT)
Community-Based
Field Trial
Cross-Sectional Study
4/27/15
1. OBSERVATION STUDY:
Researcher has no control over condition (only observe):
a. Descriptive: one study group, no control measure and
describe frequency
b. 2 groups for comparison but groups cannot be assigned
Generate & test hypothesis about possible causes and
determinants of health/nutritional status
Suggest methods of prevention and treatment
2. INTERVENTION STUDY :
Investigator control the intervention: condition can be specified,
study subjects randomly assigned to intervention & control
groups
Evaluate methods of prevention and treatment
Most convincing evidence of causes
4/27/15
14
1. DESCRIPTIVE STUDY:
Describes frequency and distribution of health and nutrition
condition in population Who? Where? When?
2. ANALYTICAL STUDY:
Study determinants, analyze/elucidate causes, test of hypothesis,
analyze relationship between health/nutritional status and variables
3. INTERVENTION STUDY:
Deliberate attempt to change a disease or health/nutritional status
determinant
Evaluative, experiment, clinical and community trials
4/27/15
1. Descriptive/Case Study
15
ADVANTAGES
Easy to write
Maybe useful to investigators
designing a study to evaluate
causes or explanation of the
observation
DISADVANTAGES
Biases related to selection and
characteristics observed
Should be viewed as
hypothesis generating and not
as conclusive, especially if
only 1 sample
4/27/15
2. Cohort Study
16
17
With outcomes
Without
outcomes
Cohort selected
for study
Unexposed or
controls
Onset of study
With outcomes
Without
outcomes
Time
18
With outcomes
Without
outcomes
Records selected
for study
With outcomes
Unexposed or
controls
Without
outcomes
Onset of study
Time
ADVANTAGES
Provide strong evidence
for possible causes and
effects
Biases can be controlled
DISADVANTAGES
Extended time make
studies costly
Possible involvement of
external factors
Problem associated with
subjects follow-up,
subjects attrition and
subjects migration
Difficulty to find the best
control matching age
and sex
4/27/15
ADVANTAGE
Required shorter time
DISADVANTAGES
Bias: rely on memory,
accuracy of records
The loses of cases will be
excluded, e.g. died before
study
4/27/15
4/27/15
Exposed
Cases
Unexposed
Exposed
Controls
Unexposed
Onset of study
Time
ADVANTAGES
The quickest and least
expensive studies to
undertake
Ideal for investigators
who need to obtain some
preliminary data prior to
writing a proposal for
more complete,
expensive and timeconsuming study
DISADVANTAGES
Have the largest number
of possible biases and
errors
Depend completely on
high-quality existing
records
Difficulties in selection of
control groups
4/27/15
ADVANTAGES
Best for determining the
status quo of a condition
Quick to complete and
relatively inexpensive
DISADVANTAGES
Provide only a snap-shot in
time of the condition of
process may be
underestimate/overestimate
Causal factors may only been
yesterday/long time
They already died
4/27/15
With outcomes
Subjects
selected for the
study
Without
outcomes
Time
Onset of study
5. Experimental Study
26
ADVANTAGES
Provide strong evidence for
possible causes and effects
Biases can be controlled
DISADVANTAGES
Expensive
Long time period is required
4/27/15
Characteristics of Experiments
27
Manipulation of variables
Active and attribute variables
Random assignment
Control groups
Blinding
Control for inter-subject differences
Homogeneity of subjects
Blocking
Matching
Subjects as their own control
Analysis of variance
4/27/15
28
Randomization
Control groups
Blinding
Repetition
Control for inter-subject differences
4/27/15
5. Experimental Study
29
Experimental
subjects
With outcomes
Without
outcomes
Subjects meeting
entry criteria
With outcomes
Controls
Without
outcomes
Onset of study
Intervention
Time
30
With outcomes
Experimental
subjects
With outcomes
Crossover
Subjects
meeting
entry
criteria
Without
outcomes
Without
outcomes
With outcomes
Controls
With outcomes
Controls
Without
outcomes
Without
outcomes
Onset of
study
Intervention
Intervention
Time
Washout period
4/27/15
DESAIN EKSPERIMEN
POPULASI
SAMP
EL
PARA PIHAK:
1. SUBYEK
2. PENELITI
3. PELAKSANA
4. OBSERVER
CONTROL
GROUP
RAND
OMISA
SI
?
TREAME
NT
GROUP
1. NO-BLIND
2. SINGLE BLIND
3. DOUBLE - BLIND
END
CONDITI
ON
?
END
CONDITI
ON
RANCANGAN PENELITIAN
EKSPERIMENTAL
I. PRE-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
1. The one - shot - case study
XO
2. The one - group pretest - posttest D.
O1 X O2
3. The static group comparison
X O1
- O2
Siswanto, 2007
Populasi
(Subyek)
R
O1 O2
R
- O2
Siswanto, 2007
O1 O2
X O2
O2
Siswanto, 2007
X O 4 O5 O6
O1 O2 O3
Kel Kontrol
X O 4 O5
O1 O2 O3
O 4 O5
Siswanto, 2007
O1 X O 2
O1 O2
Siswanto, 2007
ADVANTAGES
Reduce bio-diversity effects of
each groups
DISADVANTAGES
In the second phase: return
effects of first phase
Need longer period suitable
only for shorter period of
study, or only if U have
difficulty to find sample
4/27/15
4/27/15
Kriteria sampel
40
1.
2.
4/27/15
Kriteria Inklusi
Kriteria eksklusi
Kriteria eksklusi
Kriteria Sampel
TUGAS
Desain penelitian
Populasi
Sampel
Kriteria Inklusi
Kriteria Eksklusi
Kriteria Subjek