An Academic Exposure on Islamic

Methodology
Identifikasi dan Analisis Wellbeing
(Kemaslahatan)
Pada Organisasi Berbasis Syariah
Perspektif Metodologi Tawhidy String
Relation (TSR)
Diskusi:
Mencari Format Implementasi Metodologi TSR
Dalam Institusi Keuangan Syariah di Indonesia

Jadi Suriadi

Agenda
1. Latar Belakang : Filosofi dan
Epistemologi TSR
2. Metodologi TSR : Kaidah, Premis,
Kerangka Formulasi dan
Implementasinya Dalam Tataran Empiris
3. Konsep Pengukuran Model Wellbeing
4. Pengukuran Social Wellbeing sebagai
Index Syariah Organisasi: Policy Level,
Performance achievement & Valued

1. Latar Belakang

Filosofi dan Epistemologi TSR

Filosofi TSR

Epistemologi

Berdasarkan keyakinan umat Islam bahwa Allah itu satu. Semua ilmu (yg komplit,
benar dan abadi) itu hanya milik Allah. Maka sesungguhnya semua ilmu itu
adalah unify (satu kesatuan), yaitu ilmu Allah. Refleksi dan cara pandang ilmu
sebagai satu kesatuan, adalah filosofi dasar atas ilmu.
Unify di interprestasikan sebagai suatu perspektif/cara pandang yang holistik dan
komprehensif.
Interprestasi atas ilmu yang demikian disebut sebagai tawhid string relation
(TSR).
Sumber akhir/dasar/preferensi terakhir atas ilmu dalam rangka menjelaskan
tentang kebenaran.
Selama ini (mainstream) kebenaran empiris itu berasal dari akal pikiran manusia.
Berdasarkan TSR, kebenaran itu berasal dari Allah, melalui wahyu (Al-quran) dan
Hadist Nabi. ()
Kebenaran atas ilmu yang berasal dari akal manusia, pada prinsipnya adalah
berkah dan atas ijin Allah.
Agar nilai kebenarannya menjadi sempurna (kaffah), maka ilmu empiris harus
selalu dilakukan knowledge induced-.

Unified
Pemahaman kaffah harus menjadi acuan bagi semua kegiatan umat
muslim.
TSR sebagai metodologi

1. Latar Belakang... (lanjutan)

Filosofi dan Epistemologi TSR

Epistemologi Kant (Emanuel Kant : rasional)

Epistemologi Ghazzali (Imam Ghazzali : wahyu)

Ada kebenaran yang bisa dibuktikan/diwujudkan oleh akal

pikiran manusia (posteriori), kebenaran empiris.
Ada kebenaran yang tidak bisa dibuktikan atau diwujudkan
oleh akal pikiran manusia (apriori)
Ada posisi yang berada diantara dua bangunan
epistemologi diatas (methafisika), diakui bisa dirasakan
akan tetapi tak bisa dibuktikan.
Setelah melalui proses pengalaman hidup yang panjang,
akhirnya disimpulkan bahwa kebenaran sejati itu adalah
wahyu Allah.
Kebenaran empiris, hanya temporal saja.

Methodologi TSR (Masudul Choudhury)

Pada prinsipnya adalah menyatukan (unify) kebenaran

empiris dengan kebenaran berbasis wahyu.
TSR sebagai metodologi

Interactions in TSR methodology

Basic Understanding Framework
1. Basic principle of
knowledge is based on
Islamic Epistemology.
2. Established model,
formula or equation on
mathematical figure.
(simplify)
3. The outcome is to be
based on measurement
tool (Social wellbeing
Index)
4. Applied measurement
on empirical case, to
measure human being
activities.
5. Specific measurement
lay on social or
economics science
6. Expanded to all social

2. TSR Methodology : the essence, framework and

premises
(Defined of wellbeing function in the system)
The essence of TSR :
In a system with many variables inside:
interdependency
Circular causation
dynamic variables
correlation among variable
interaction,;
integration;
(learning process) as evolutionary (IIE).
system as public organization
establish Social Wellbeing Measurement Model (SWMM)
Modified balance score card as a tool, variable as critical succes
factors (CSF)
In detail find out and draw down to key performance indicator
(KPI).
Human being rationality or empirical knowledge (under mainstream
perspective)
Must be embedded by knowledge induced-.
General figure of each variable is in the form (ki.Xi()
It has, participatory level, performance achievement and valued dimension
Final Social Wellbeing Measurement Model (SWMM) are:

Premise #1 : Complexity and Endogeneity

Complexity is indeed an unshakable nature of all
multidimensional relations of variables and systems defined by
them. Yet the dynamic evolutionary learning nature of
systemic interactions needs to chart the history of the future to
predict, guide and explain reconstruction and change. Such
attributes reveal inner consciousness that isembedded in
historical change (choudhury, 2013)
1. Complexity : to figure out in form
of circular causation and
established many equations as
simultaneous equations.
2. Endogeneity: all variables are in
endogenous variables, an organic
influence, no reduction, no
substitutions.
3. There is non linier defined (in
formulation of equation). No
ceteris paribus assumption, no
optimum calculation.
4. Simulation is closed in reality

1) The number of elements (variables, agents, sub-systems) is sufficiently large.

Moreover, the variables interact dynamically, and the interactions can be physical
or involve the exchange of information.
2) Such interactions are rich, i.e. any variables or sub-system in the system is affected
by and affects several other elements or sub-systems
3) The interactions are non-linear. Small changes in inputs, physical interactions or
stimuli can cause large effects or very significant changes in outputs
4) Any interactions can feed back into itself directly or after a number of intervening
stages. Such feedback can vary in quality.
5) Such systems may be open and it may be difficult or impossible to define system
boundaries
6) Complex systems operate under far from equilibrium conditions
7) Complex systems have a history. They evolve and their past is co-responsible for
their present behavior.
8) There are many equations generated as simultaneously.

Economic Theory of Complexity :

Reviewed

David Orrell (2012), Economyths

Teori ekonomi yang menjadi acuan neo-liberal (sebelum
2008)
1.
2.
3.
4.

Adam Smith, Wealth of Nation : production, consumption

Keynessian, neoliberal : supply-demand equilibrium
Fama, Effeciency market hyphotesis : pricing theory
John Stiglitz, neo-liberal, monetary system; growth theory

Setelah 2008 (krisis keuangan USA)

5. Tak ada satu teori pun yang bisa secara precisi memprediksi apa
yang akan terjadi kedepan.
6. Data salah: asumsi salah, ada yang belum masuk perhitungan
(human behavior).
7. Model Econometric : mengabaikan fakta karena kepentingan
( etika)

Alternatif Solusi
8. Kerangka model CAS (complex adaptive system) dalam
9. Regulator : policy, monitoring, Ethic (political economy)
10. Project CAS : USA, EU, dan CEOD lainnya

Premise #2 : Participatory Among Agents

In a system which contains many variables (agents) and all are endogenous variables
(no reduction and no substitution) , so then each variable has a certain level of
participation or contribution to the system.
All variables configure a complement each other ( as like pairing with many members)
Every variable has same possibility to being dependent variable (focus consideration
in measurement)
Simplest model of basic equation or formulation is figure out as below:

X1=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11

X2=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X3=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X4=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X5=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X6=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X7=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X8=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X9=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X10=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
X11=k1.X1+k2.X2+ k3.X3+ k4.X4+k5X5+ k6.X6+ k7.X7+ k8.X8+ k9.X9+k10X10+k11.X11
The model comply to econometric method under VECM (vector error correction model)
and module FEVD (forecast error variance decomposition)

Variables identification in the system

S
S
X
i

X
i

X
i
X
i

Xi

Xi
Xi

The behavior of economy is determined by computer sumulations that track

Lacking
Overlapping
perfect
the interactions betwwen economic agent as they buy, sell and trade the
complementary
goods and
services. The model economy therefor emerge from the actions of
the individula agent, just as it does in real life. The aim is not to make
abstract mathematical proofs of stability of other properties, as with the
Arrow-Debreu model, but instead to use the model as kind of experimental
laboratoey for trying out ideas.
There is plenty of empirical evidence to show that simple model make better
prediction than complicated model.
(Orriel, D ., 2012)

Participatory Among Agents: Reviewed

Prof. Sofyan Safri H (2012): Kuliah Metodologi
Teori komplemen
1. Allah menciptakan segala sesuatu berpasangan, secara
komplement : siang-malam, pria-wanita, bumi-langit dsb.
Komplemen 2 agen ini bisa dinamis menjadi komplement multi
agen
2. Semua makhluk ciptaan Allah pasti mempunyai maksud dan
peranan tertentu (participatory) terhadap sistem.
3. Teori partisipasi : sesuai kehendak pendiri negar RI (UUD ps.33)

Alfredo Pareto
4. Chaothic clasic : 20/80
5. Pure socialist; 50/50
6. State Political : check the current condition

Alternatif Solusi
7. Simplify the CAS, to implement the system into real activities
measurement.
8. Apply PAA figure : VAR/VECM, FEVD (data sekunder : time series)
9. Apply modified balance score card (data primer)

Premise #3 : Wellbeing Function

The principle of knowledge induced- is ilustrated by Prof. Choudhury as below:

(,S) {} {x()}

(,x()) simulate W(x()) recalling (,S)

Subject to circular

causation between
evolution of new
the variables
knowledge-flowcontinuity
Notation

Notation
as cardinal of knowledge (perfect and complete), own by Allah
S as acertain condition named shuratic process
X as Variable, agent, sub-system or CSF
X() as variable X which is knowledge induced- already
W () as a wellbeing function, contains variable X which is knowledge induced- already

The process of knowledge induced (), therefor are as below:

Xi + ()
Xi()
(Xi) + ()
(, Xi())
(X1, X2, X3, .... Xn,) + ()
(X1(), X2(), X3(), X4, ........X5(),())

X1() = ( X2(), X3(), X4(), . . . . . . .

.X11(),())
X2() = (X1(), X3(), X4(), . . . . . . . .
X11(),())
X3() = (X1(), X2(), X4(), . . . . . . . . .
X11(),())
X4() = (X1(), X2(), X3(), .. . . . . . . . .
X11(),())
The simplest mathematical model of PAA of the eqiuations are:
And so on, up to
X1() = k1X1() + k2X2() +k3X3() + k4X4() + k5X5() + ..........
X11() = (X
1(), X2(), X3(), X4(),. . . . . . . X11.
k11 X11() +k0()
())
X1()
= k1X1()
+ k2X2() +k3X3() + k4X4() + k5X5() + ..........
() = (X
2()
, X2(), X3()
, X4(),
k11 X1111()
()
X5()......X
,) +k0()

X3() = k1X1() + k2X2() +k3X3() + k4X4() + k5X5() + ..........

k11 X11() +k0()
X4() = k1X1() + k2X2() +k3X3() + k4X4() + k5X5() + ..........
k11 X11() +k0()
W()
()to
+ k2X2() +k3X3() + k4X4() +.... knXn() + k0()
and =
sok1X
on 1up
W()
always
Dependent Variable or focus of consideration
X11is()
= k1Xas
1() + k2X2() +k3X3() + k4X4() + k5X5()+..........
(measurement)
kW()
11 X11()
0()
as+k
figure
of Social Wellbeing Measurement Model
() = k1X1() + k2X2() +k3X3() + k4X4() + k5X5() + .......... k11

The Construction Model of Social Wellbeing to be measured as

below:
W() = k1X1() + k2X2() +k3X3() + .... + k11X11() + k0()
W() is essence of goodness from all variables in the system, it is called
as wellbeing of system or wellbeing index (WI). WI must be in position as
dependent variable (to be focus consideration in measurement)
(ki) is participation/contribution level which it is usualy decided by policy
(Xi) is achievement level, scoring by certain method & procedures.
() is essence of syariah which is embedded to each variable. The main
contents are morality, ethic and social value. Acceptance level of
stakeholders.
k0(), is part of the truth which is not coverage by the existing variable
(empty space of empirical knowledge)

The model is under kaffah perspective

The structure is similar will empirical system, with each variable has
been knowledge induced-()
Each variable has unified of 3 dimensions ( kiX i()): contribution level,
achievement level, accpetance level.
Measurement of () in morality, ethic and social value in each variable
by stakeholders as Knowledge induced- () of human rationality on
empirical and quantitative figure. By likert scale (5).

Wellbeing Function (WF): Reviewed

Prof. Masudul: Kuliah TSR
Perspectif Epistemologi
1. Sumber atas ilmu (kebenaran) itu dari Allah (bukan dari akal manusia).
2. Semua variabel empiris (Xi) (dianggap benar oleh akal manusia) harus
dilakukan knowledge induced-. Sehingga selalu berupa Xi(). Yaitu
variabel yg kaffah, dunia-akherat.
3. Fokus pengukuran (dependent variabel) selalu pada Social Wellbeing
(W())

Identifikasi ()-valued
4. ()-valued adalah esensi ajaran agama islam dalam setiap kegiatan
manusia, termasuk ilmu economi.
5. Definisi awal sebagai unsur : moralitas, etika dan nilai sosial
6. Dalam data primer, bisa dimodofokasi disesuaikan dengan sistem
yang dikehendaki.

Alternatif Solusi
7. Gunakan kerangka : CAS, PAA dan WF sebagai total prosedur dalam
TSR methodology.
8. Simulasi : Discrete simulation, Modified BSc sebagai alat ukur
9. Data : semua data kualitatif dan kuantitatif terlibat

Contoh Data dan data

treatment

IP

CS

SV

EL

ER

(IP)

(Cs)

(SV)

(EL)

(ER)

Avrg

1994-1

2.00

4.36

1.48

2.16

95.64

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.03

10.00

2.81

1994-2

2.15

4.59

1.70

2.19

93.62

1.05

1.04

1.08

1.40

7.36

2.38

1995-1

2.35

4.82

1.85

2.22

92.76

1.11

1.08

1.14

1.90

6.23

2.29

1995-2

2.57

5.05

2.15

2.26

93.63

1.18

1.11

1.25

2.54

7.37

2.69

1996-1

2.73

5.27

2.42

2.29

95.11

1.23

1.15

1.35

3.07

9.30

3.22

1996-2

2.84

5.85

2.82

2.30

95.56

1.27

1.24

1.50

3.24

9.90

3.43

1997-1

3.17

6.43

3.03

2.31

95.32

1.37

1.34

1.59

3.34

9.58

3.44

1997-2

3.95

7.07

3.58

2.33

94.92

1.62

1.44

1.79

3.73

9.06

3.53

1998-1

4.76

7.70

5.74

2.37

94.54

1.88

1.55

2.61

4.28

8.56

3.78

1998-2

5.14

10.72

5.74

2.40

94.45

2.01

2.04

2.61

4.75

8.44

3.97

1999-1

5.42

13.75

6.09

2.42

94.50

2.10

2.54

2.74

5.16

8.51

4.21

1999-2

6.01

13.31

6.26

2.45

94.37

2.29

2.46

2.80

5.52

8.34

4.28

2000-1

6.75

12.87

6.58

2.46

93.86

2.52

2.39

2.92

5.78

7.67

4.26

2000-2

7.38

13.71

7.24

2.47

92.87

2.72

2.53

3.18

5.90

6.37

4.14

2001-1

7.89

14.55

7.68

2.47

91.81

2.89

2.67

3.34

5.91

4.99

3.96

2001-2

8.28

17.59

8.15

2.47

91.24

3.01

3.16

3.52

5.92

4.25

3.97

2002-1

8.59

20.63

8.04

2.48

90.94

3.11

3.66

3.48

6.02

3.85

4.02

2002-2

8.94

21.56

8.54

2.50

90.60

3.22

3.81

3.66

6.30

3.41

4.08

2003-1

9.36

22.49

8.62

2.52

90.33

3.36

3.97

3.69

6.72

3.05

4.16

2003-2

9.91

23.01

8.62

2.55

90.21

3.53

4.05

3.69

7.15

2.90

4.27

2004-1

10.61

23.53

8.91

2.57

90.14

3.76

4.14

3.80

7.51

2.81

4.40

2004-2

11.49

25.10

9.45

2.59

89.97

4.04

4.39

4.01

7.72

2.58

4.55

2005-1

12.56

26.68

9.93

2.59

89.74

4.38

4.65

4.19

7.82

2.28

4.67

2005-2

13.75

27.99

11.05

2.63

88.76

4.76

4.87

4.61

8.45

1.00

4.74

2006-1

14.90

29.30

11.64

2.62

89.55

5.13

5.08

4.83

8.30

2.04

5.08

2006-2

15.97

32.32

12.64

2.65

89.91

5.48

5.57

5.21

8.80

2.51

5.51

2007-1

17.36

35.34

13.45

2.65

90.25

5.92

6.07

5.52

8.71

2.94

5.83

2007-2

19.37

36.99

15.10

2.48

90.89

6.57

6.34

6.14

6.10

3.79

5.79

2008-1

21.43

38.64

15.65

2.66

91.03

7.23

6.61

6.35

8.82

3.97

6.59

2008-2

22.82

40.82

17.41

2.68

91.98

7.67

6.97

7.01

9.17

5.21

7.20

2009-1

23.91

43.01

18.36

2.68

91.86

8.02

7.32

7.37

9.28

5.05

7.41

2009-2

25.27

46.25

19.93

2.65

92.80

8.46

7.85

7.96

8.76

6.28

7.86

2010-1

26.90

49.48

21.40

2.69

92.60

8.98

8.38

8.52

9.34

6.02

8.25

2010-2

28.77

54.43

24.19

2.71

92.86

9.58

9.19

9.57

9.70

6.36

8.88

2011-1

30.80

59.37

25.33

2.73

91.75

10.23

10.00

10.00

10.06

4.91

9.04

Output FEVD modul

V
Varianc
arianceDec
eDecompos
omposition
ition
Percent
PercentLNW
LNWvvarianc
ariance
edue
duetto
oLN
LNIP
IP

Perc
Percent
entLN
LNWv
Wvarianc
ariance
edue
dueto
toLN
LNW
W

100
100

80
80

80
80

80
80

60
60

60
60

60
60

40
40

40
40

40
40

20
20

20
20
00

Percent
PercentLN
LNW
Wvvariance
ariancedue
dueto
toLN
LNCS
CS

100
100

100
100

20
20

00
55

10
10

15
15

20
20

25
25

30
30

55

35
35

10
10

15
15

20
20

25
25

30
30

35
35

00

55

10
10

15
15

20
20

25
25

30
30

35
35

Percent
PercentLNW
LNWvvarianc
ariance
edue
duetto
oLN
LNSV
SV
100
100

Percent
PercentLNW
LNWvvarianc
ariance
edue
duetto
oLNEL
LNEL

80
80
60
60
40
40
20
20
00

55

10
10

15
15

20
20

25
25

30
30

35
35

100
100

80
80

80
80

60
60

60
60

40
40

40
40

20
20

20
20

00

Period

Perc
Percent
entLNW
LNWvvariance
ariancedue
dueto
toLNER
LNER

100
100

55

S.E.

10
10

15
15

20
20

LNW

25
25

30
30

00

35
35

LNIP

LNCS

55

10
10

15
15

LNSV

20
20

25
25

LNEL

30
30

35
35

LNER

0.025837

100

0.035504

81.61231

1.923042

0.155359

0.011826

15.82115

0.476308

0.044659

64.12308

3.895368

0.144592

0.127715

31.25745

0.451794

32

0.20084

8.603157

47.64967

18.40456

8.458315

12.43509

4.449202

33

0.201317

8.61207

47.73561

18.36121

8.440932

12.37631

4.473872

34

0.201742

8.622065

47.812

18.32077

8.424084

12.32447

4.496617

35

0.202122

8.634217

47.87873

18.28271

8.40763

12.27897

4.517745

CholeskyOrdering:LNWLNIPLNCSLNSVLNELLNER

Discrete Simulation

Sistem
Xi()
Xi()

Xi()

SWI W()
internal
Xi()

Xi()

Pengaruh
Lingkungan/Ekternal

Xi()

Berapa banyak variabel dalam sistem?

Bila sistem adalah organisasi bisnis, apakah variabel

itu?

Secara teori tidak terhitung, secara empiris sekitar 5 s/d 10

BUMN dalam (KPKU-BUMN) menetapkan 5 atau 6 variabel
BSC ada 4 Variabel, Modified BSC bisa bervariasi
tergantung dari tingkat keperluan organisasi.

Variabel adalah critical success factor (CSF)

Terdiri dari beberapa indikator utama yang kita sebut, key
performance indicators (KPI)
Dalam CSF ada beberapa KPI
Dalam KPI terdiri dari key performance drivers (KPD)

Bagaimana mengidentifikasi KPI

Secara umum menggunakan (SMART), specific,

measurable, attainable, realistic dan timebond
Ada penetapan bobot, target dan pengawasan berkala

How to measure ()..?

1. -valued to identify as morality, ethics and social value for
each variable. Focus identification are on designing and
executing. There are 6 indicators in questioners in each
variable.
2. It is open for innovation to define -valued in better sense.
3. -valued to measure by likert scale (5), by stakeholders of
BPRS : debitors, creditors, employees,
academicians/community leaders
4. Number of respondents is very critical
5. The result e.i. as in the table below;

3. Konsep Pengukuran Wellbeing

Langkah implementasi TSR
1. Konsep dasar yang utama adalah, bahwa epistemologinya
mengacu pada Epistemologi Islam. Bukan, akal pikiran
manusia.
2. Mengikuti 3 premis utama, yaitu; complecity and
endogeneity; participatory among agents; wellbeing
function.
3. Tentukan sistem yang akan diamati (setting up, object to be
observed).
4. Definisikan variabel apa saja yang harus ada dalam sistem
tersebut.
5. Bila menggunakan data sekunder: a) dapatkan data time
series yg cukup panjang (bila diperlukan interpolasi; b)
definisikan index-; c) running VAR/VECM, lslu FEVD index-
sebagai dependent variable; d) hasil yang didapatkan
adalah PAA atau nilai partisipasi.
6. Bila data primerr; a) Social Wellbeing refer to Simulation
Method; b) to select Discrete Simulation as neccessary;

Pendalaman Materi

1. Complexity refer to CAS

2. PAA refer to FEVD module
3. Social Wellbeing refer to Simulation
Method then to select Discrete
Simulation as neccessary
4. Figure out Modified Balance Scorecard as
discrete simulator

4. Pengukuran TSR sebagai Index Syariah

Organisasi:
Policy Level, Performance achievement &
Valued
Social Wellbeing sebagai
Index Syariah pada
organisasi/institusi bisnis perspektif TSR:
bisakah...?
Diskusi

5. Wellbeing On General Perspective

Penomena Baru Pengukuran Kinerja Syariah

Diskusi

Rangkuman : Metodologi TSR

Diskusi rangkuman metodologi TSR
1. 3 premis utama TSR: complexity & endogeneity; participatory
among agents (PAA); wellbeing function (WF).
2. Dalam ilmu sosial, telah diidentifikasi bahwa semua variabel berada
dalam posisi dinamis (selalu berubah/bergerak) karena itu tak ada
sistim yang berada dalam posisi steady state equlibrium,
akibatnya tak ada model formulasi apapun untuk menjadi
modelnya. Konsekuensinya semua model (ekonomi) harus dalam
bentuk complex adaptice system (CAS). CAS adalah model
pengukuran dengan prinsip simulasi, tak ada prediksi hasil
pengukuran yang bernilai tetap.
3. CAS dalam ilmu sosial (bukan mesin) tak bisa menggunakan sistem
komputerisasi secara kontinue, tetapi dengan sekuen waktu
tertentu sesuai dengan keperluan discrete simulat6ion.
4. Model matematis yg terukur, harus dalam bentuk participatory
among agents (PAA) dimana yg terukur bukan besarnya nilai
nominal, akan tetapi nilai perubahan (delta, changing, shock).
Tingkat keakurasian pengukuran tergantung pada data dan
kelengkapan (complementness).
5. PAA bisa dilakukan pada data sekunder (secara ekonometri) dan
lebih bagus dalam data primer (implementasi dalam bidang
manajemen, berbasis kinerja).
6. Dalam sitem, tiap variable (Xi) harus dilakukan knowledge

Diskusi rangkuman metodologi TSR (lanjutan)

8. Implementasi dengan running, data sekunder, ( time series, cukup
panjang) menggunkan software eviews dengan metode VAR/VECM
(lihat, Ascarya;2009) dan pilih menu FEVD akan didapatkan
besarnya nilai tingkat partisipasi (ki) variable.
9. Sedangkan nilai variabel Xi() adalah nilai eksisting yang ada,
sehingga ()-valued pada tiap variabel tidak bisa dihitung atau
didefinisikan lebih jauh lagi.
10. Data primer lebih memberi ruang gerak yang leluasa untuk
mendefinisikan ()-valued dalam sistem, dan figure W()
11. Model discrete simulation harus diterjemahkan lanjut dalam suatu
alat pengukuran, agar didapatkan figure yang dikehendaki.
12. Pada kasus diatas digunakan modified balance scorecard (MBSc),
suatu cara pengukuran dengan metode BSc yang telah dimodifikasi
sesuai dengan tingkat kepentingan, pengukuran sistem.
13. Model MBSc, sebagaimana dimaksud (refer Excel file).
14. Berikut FAQ:
Apa yang diukur? : fokus akhir adalah figure Social Wellbeing
Index (SWI)
Dalam bentuk apa? : form MBSc sebagai discrete simulator
Apa saja isi form?: refer excell file, kategori sub-system:
performance measurement, min. req. (government compliance
& sharial compliance)
Apa isi perf.measurement?: Variable; KPI; KPD

Implementasi : Metodologi TSR

Implementasi metodologi TSR
1. Menjadi kerangka kerja dan dasar operasional organisasi bisnis
(terutama yang berbasis syariah) dengan mengadopsi sistem CAS.
Lingkungan penuh dengan ketidak-pastian
Sub-system/department harus selalu waspada setiap saat
(monitor target-achievement).
Kerjasama tim dalam koridor PAA
Sedikit kesalahan bisa berakibat fatal (non-linier)
2. Menjadi acuan dalam menyusun kebijakan bagi organisasi sektor
publik
Fokus pada Social Wellbeing atau kemaslahatan
Identifikasi besaran variabel meliputi k(i)Xi()
Pengukuran melibatkan masyarakat (partisipasi aktif)
3. Regulator/Pemerintah/Lembaga rating
Menyusun standar pengukuran
Alat monitoring
Alat kontrol

TERIMA KASIH