PuriFikaSi
A. Pendahuluan
Beberapa teknik isolasi enzim secara umum
dikelompokan menjadi:
Metode klasik berupa distilasi dan ekstraksi dengan
pelarut organik (berdasarkan sifat umum makromolekul:
pH, kekuatan ion dan kelarutan) Kurang digunakan lagi
karena kaitannya dengan kestabilan enzim
Perbedaan sifat protein globular: Mr, muatan protein
Interaksi spesifik dan reversibel antara enzim dengan
substrat, koenzim, ligan
Penemuan separasi enzim
Penemuan Tahun
Pengendapan dengan alkohol 1833 (Payen & Persoz)
Adsorpsi spesifik amylase dengan 1910 (Starkenstein)
substrat insolubel
Penggunaan adsorbant untuk 1922 (Willstarter)
pemurnian enzim
Penggunaan ultrasentrifugasi 1923 (Svedberg & Nichols)
pertama kali
Kristalisasi Urease 1926 (Summer)
80 enzim terisolasi 1930
Pengenalan resin penukar ion 1935 (Adams & Holmes)
Kromatografi adsorpsi 1938-1941 (Zechmeister &
Brockman)
Metode Pengendapan terfraksi 1946 (Cohn)
dengan pelarut organik
Kromatografi dengan hidroksi 1951-1956 (Tiselius & Swingle)
apatit
Pengenalan penukar ion selulosa 1956 (Sober & Peterson)
Pengenalan sepadex dan gel 1959 (Porath & Flodin)
filtrasi
Elektroforesis Protein 1966 (Vesterberg)
Introduksi aktivasi dengan CNBr 1967 (Axen & Porath)
SDS Page elektroforesis 1967 (Shapiro)
Induksi konsep kromatografi 1968 (Cuatrecasas)
afinitas
Kromatografi hidrofob 1971 (Yon, Er El & Shaltiel)
Lebih dari 2000 enzim terisolasi 1980
PEMISAHAN MATERIAL
Tahap Ekstraksi
Ekstrak total
Tahap Fraksionasi
Ekstrak kasar
Tahap Purifikasi
Enzim murni
Microbial source
Often more stable than analogous enzyme obtained from
plant or animal tissue
Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) certified microbes are
non pathogenic, nontoxic, and generally they do not produce
antibiotics
Ultrasentrifugasi
Sentrifugasi zonal Gel Elektroforesis Mobilitas elektroforesis
Mr Muatan
Elektro
Densitas Enzim Titik isoelektrik dekantasi
Pengaturan pH larutan
+ _
_ C
A + A
+ _
N _ T
O + H
+ _
D _ O
E + D
+ _
_ E
+
+ _
4 5 6 7 8 9 pH
Attached to
cation exchangers
_
Range of pH stability
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and N-terminal amino acid
sequence of D-carnitine dehydrogenase
12/4/2017
REVERSE NANO ULTRA MICRO
FEATURE
OSMOSIS FILTRATION FILTRATION FILTRATION
Symmetrical
Membrane Asymmetrical Asymmetrical Asymmetrical
Asymmetrical
Wall Thickness 150mm 150mm 150-250mm 10-150mm
Film thickness 1mm 1mm 1mm various
HMWC,
HMWC, mono-
LMWC,Sodiu Macromolecules,
,di-, and aligo-
m, Chloride, proteins, Particulates, clay,
Rejects saccharides,
glucose, polysaccharid bacteria
polyvalent
amino acids, es, viruses
anions
proteins
Tubular, hollow-
Tubular, spiral- Tubular, spiral- Tubular, hollow-
Membrane fibre, spiral-
wound, plate wound, plate fibre, plate &
module wound, plate
& frame & frame frame
& frame
CA, TFC,
Ceramic,
Material CA, TFC CA, TFC CA, TFC, Ceramic
PVDF,
Sintered
Pressure 15-150 bar 5-35 bar 1-10 bar <2 bar
Flux 10-50 (l/m2/hr) 10-100 l/m2/hr 10-200 l/m2/hr 50-1000 l/m2/hr
Some membrane types
Ultrafiltration Microfiltration
RO membrane
MIKROFILTRASI
Menggunakan membran: tipis dan
Tanpa pembentukan cake
microporous
Lubang pori2nya kecil dan sangat
monodisperse
Mempunyai kemampuan menyaring partikel
yang tidak diinginkan
Membran mengikuti hukum Darcys untuk
permeabilitas dan ketahanan yang tinggi thd
aliran. Konvensional ketahanannya rendah.
Perlu dilakukan pembersihan secara berkala
Aliran yang melalui membran lebih rendah
daripada aliran melalui conventional filter
cake. Filter area per liter volume lebih besar
daripada convensional.
Type : Plate and frame, spiral wound and
hollow fiber
Plate and Frame
Spiral Wound
Tubular ceramic
Hollow Fibre
Bacterial Cell Lactose
Casein, whey Minerals
Important terms
Feed or Product
Initial material into system on
feed side of membrane
Retentate or Concentrate
The fraction of the feed which
is rejected by the membrane.
Permeate
The fraction of the feed which
passes through the membrane
Spiral Wound
Plate and Frame
Tubular
Capilary
Hollow fibre
Pipe
Ceramic
Zeolite
Stainless Steel
Downstream protein purification
by ultrafiltration concentration and
diafiltration
MF Applications: late 1990s
Cold sterilization of pharmaceuticals
Cell harvesting
Sterile process filters for gas-phase
Clarification of fruit juices, wine and beer
Ultrapure water in semiconductor industry
Metal recovery (colloidal (hydro)oxides)
Waste water treatment
Separation of oil-water emulsions
Dehydration of lattices
Pretreatment for RO
Eykamp, 1995; Mulder, 1998
UF Applications: 1980s
Chemical Industry
Electro coat painting recovery
Latex processing
Textile size recovery
Recovery of lubricant oils
Medical Applications
Kidney dialysis
Waste treatment
Recovery of valuable products from
effluents
Cheese whey
Cheryan, 1986
UF Applications: late 1990s
electro paint recovery, oil-water emulsions
Beverages (juices)
Dairy (milk, whey, cheese making)
Food (gelatin, starch, sugar and proteins)
Textile (sizing, dyes)
Pharmaceutical (enzymes, antibiotics,
pyrogens)
Pulp and paper industry
Leather industry
Water purification
Eykamp, 1995; Mulder, 1998
Factors affecting membrane
structure:
choice of polymer, choice of solvent and
nonsolvent, composition of casting solution,
composition of coagulation bath, temperature
of the casting solution and coagulation bath,
evaporation time, location of the liquid-liquid
demixing gap and crystallization behaviour of
the polymer
Module Type
Characteristic Flat plate Spiral Shell Hollow Fibre
Wound and
Tube
Packaging Moderate Moderate Low High (9000-30000
density (m2/m3) (200-400) (300-900) (150-300)
Reasons Limitations
- Reuse of enzyme(reducing cost) -Cost of carriers and immobilization
- Easy product separation -Changes in properties(selectivity)
- Continuous processing -Mass transfer limitations
- Stabilization by immobilization -Activity loss during immobilization
Conventional Immobilization Methods
Adsorption
Covalent
binding
Cross-linking
Immobilization
Entrapment
Encapsulation
Immobilization Adsorption /
Covalent crosslinking Affinity attachment
type Absorption
Identical orientation by
Generally simple Reproducibility and site specific
stability of protein layer immobilization
No manipulation of the Direct immobilization
Advantage protein sample The possibility of by high affinity
controlling the density Easy protein
and environment of the purification and array
immobilized species fabrication
Reproducibility and
stability of protein layer
Some protein denature
The possibility of
and inactive
controlling the density
Unstable binding Non- Non-specific random
and environment of the
specific random and orientation: activity
immobilized species
multi-oriented protein decreased
immobilization: activity Some protein denature
Disadvantage decreased and inactive
Irreproducibility of Additional chemical Difficult application in
results reaction for modification multi-subunit proteins
in vitro The possibility of
elusion of some protein