CLASS CONTRACT & BASIC COURSE OUTLINE

Study Program : S-3 Language and Literature Education

Course : Advanced Qualitative Research
Course Code :
Credit :3
Semester : Odd Semester, Academic Year 2022/2023
Pre-requisite :-
Lecturers : Prof. Slamet
SSetiawan,M.A.,
Dr. Widyastuti, M.Pd.

A. Course Description

Penerapan analitis prinsip-prinsip dasar penelitian kualitatif untuk merancang prosedur

penelitian di bidang pendidikan bahasa-sastra, bidang kebahasan dan/atau kesastraan
secara aplikatif operasional. Topik kajian mata kuliah ini meliputi paradigma penelitian
kualitatif, model-model penelitian kualitataif, fungsi teori, pengumpulan dan pengolahan
data, penganalisisan data, pengujian kesahihan temuan.

B. Course Learning Outcomes:

CLO 1 : Memanfaatkan ipteks untuk Menyusun sintesis hasil penelitian bidang

pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra lima tahun terakhir dari jurnal internasional
bereputasi untuk mendapatkan model metode penelitian yang mendukung dan
mengakselerasi penyelesaian proposal disertasi.
CLO 2 : Berdisiplin dalam menaati hukum dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat dan
bernegara, dan berpegang teguh pada nilai, norma, dan etika akademik, serta
bertanggungjawab atas pekerjaan di bidang keahliannya secara mandiri dan
berpegang teguh pada nilai, norma, dan etika akademik
CLO 3 : Mengembangkan pemikiran logis, kritis, sistematis, kreatif, dan inovatif
melalui penelitian ilmiah bidang pendidikan bahasa dan sastra, serta bidang
kebahasaan dan kesastraan, dan mengidentifikasi masalah bidang pendidikan
bahasa dan sastra, serta bidang kebahasaan dan kesastraan sebagai objek
penelitian dan memposisikannya ke dalam peta penelitian yang
dikembangkan melalui pendekatan interdisiplin, multidisiplin, dan
transdisiplin
CLO 4 : Menguasai konsep metodologi penelitian kualitatif bidang pendidikan bahasa
dan sastra untuk pengembangan bahasa, sastra dan pembelajarannya
CLO 5 : Terampil mengelola dan mengembangkan riset bidang pendidikan bahasa
dan sastra, serta bidang kebahasaan dan kesastraan secara kualitatif yang
 bermanfaat bagi masyarakat dan keilmuan

C. Assessment Plan

There will be 4 types of assessments:

1. Participation : 20%
2. Presentation & Quiz : 20 %
3. UTS: Take home Assignment : 30 %
4. UAS: Project Paper : 30%

The following is the description.

1. Participation : 20 %
Participation has two aspects: attendance and class participation.
Class participation
sco
re
more than 6 40
5,6 30
3,4 20
1,2 10
0 5

You must attend the class at least 75%. Those who are 4 (four) or more times
absent are not allowed to join exams and therefore are considered failed.

Participation Rubrics

Attendance Note:
sco Frequency of attendance max
re 60%
More than 60 Class participation 40%
12
Class participation includes:
11,12 50
1. frequency of questioning
9,10 40
7,8 30 2. frequency of giving opinion
Less than 7 20 3. frequency consultation
4. thinking creativity
 2. UTS: Take home Assignment : 20%

Assignment Rubrics

Interval Predicate

80 - 100 Very good

70 -79 Go
od
60 - 69 Average

40 - 59 Po
or

3. Assignment: 30%
3.1 Method Section of Paper from “Another Class” : 10%
3.2 Presentation: 20%
1) Refer to the suggested reference in the BCO (PART D)
2) Supply evidence for the application in detail of the method from recent reputable international
journal papers (Scopus or WoS)

Presentation Rubrics

Skor Rubrik
4 (80-100) Presentasi dilakukan

● secara runtut dengan bahasa yang berterima,

● menunjukkan pemahaman konsep yang baik,

● berbantuan media ppt atau bentuk lain sesuai kriteria media,

● jawaban untuk penanya benar,

● mampu memformulasikan saran untuk perbaikan

3 (66-79) Presentasi dilakukan
● secara runtut dengan bahasa yang berterima,

● kurang pemahaman pada beberapa konsep,

● berbantuan media ppt atau ybentuk lain sesuai kriteria media,

● jawaban untuk penanya secara umum benar,

 ● mampu memformulasikan saran untuk perbaikan
2 (56-65) Presentasi dilakukan
● kurang runtut

● menunjukkan kekurangpahaman terhadap beberapa konsep,

● berbantuan media ppt atau bentuk lain namun tidak sesuai kriteria media,

● jawaban untuk penanya secara umum tidak benar,

● mampu memformulasikan saran untuk perbaikan

1 (40-55) Presentasi dilakukan,
● kurang runtut

● menunjukkan kekurang pahaman terhadap banyak konsep,

● tidak berbantuan media sama sekali,

● jawaban unuk penanya tidak benar,

● tidak mampu memformulasikan saran untuk perbaikan

4. UAS: Proposal : 30%

Write a proposal that follows the outline presented in the table below.

Proposal Format & Rubrics

Content Detail Max Score Real Score

not more than 15 words, do not use the word “ANALYSIS”
Title for the title)

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background (general background, previous studies,
research gap, problem)
● General background (to the point on the topic of the
2
research)
● Previous studies (local and overseas references, the
4
more references the easier to find the research gap)
● Research gap and novelty (What has not been done
by previous researchers, what is the weakness of the 4
previous researches, what makes the present
research different)
● Purposes of the study 2
1.2 Research Questions 5
1.3 Research Objectives 5
1.4 Scope and Limitation 5
 1.5 Significance of the Study 5
1.6 Definition of Key Terms 5
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 10
2.1 Theories/references related to question #1
2.2 Theories/references related to question #2
Etc.
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHOD
3.1 Research Design (reasons for choosing a certain method
related to the proposed research) 6

3.2 Subject/Informant and Setting or objects 5

3.3 Data and Source of the Data (a form of data and where
they are taken from) 5

3.4 Data Collection Technique and Instrument (clear

explanation of the relationship between every RQ and 8
its technique & instrument used)
3.5 Research Procedure (steps/phases of data collection) 5
3.6 Data Analysis Technique (explanation and examples for
each step/phase as well as theories used for data 8
analysis)
Other aspects:
References (list of relevant books and at least 5-25
relevant journal articles both local and international, 6
using Mendeley referencing manager)
Appendix/es (instruments used for research and other
documents) 5

Punctuation/Mechanic/Grammar (Check with

5
Grammarly)
Total 100 X

Score (X/100) x 100

The grading components above are converted into the following scoring conversion
for the final score.

FINAL SCORE.

Scoring
Conversion
Alphabet Number Scoring Interval
A 4 85 ≤ A < 100
A 3, 80 ≤ A- < 85
- 75
B 3 75 ≤ B+ < 80
+ ,
5
B 3 70 ≤ B < 75
B 2, 65 ≤ B- < 70
- 75
C 2 60 ≤ C+ < 65
+ ,
5
C 2 55 ≤ C < 60
D 1 40 ≤ D < 55
E 0 0 ≤ E < 40
 D. Study Timetable
PERT
BAHAN KAJIAN
KE-
1 RPS
kontrak perkuliahan
search engines
scholarly sources
mendeley
course policies
2 1. CCDA: Classroom Critical
Discourse Analysis
2. Classroom Discourse
Analysis
3. Discourse Analysis
3 4. Literacy circle
5. Grounded theory
6. Case Study
4 7. Ethnography
SUMBER BELAJAR/MEDIA PRESENTER
RPS
Libgen.io
Scholar.google.com
Perpusnas
Unesa library
[1] Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S.
Lincoln-The SAGE Handbook of
Qualitative Research-SAGE
Publications, Inc. (2017)
[2] Qualitative Research in Applied presenters:
Linguistics_ A Practical
Introduction-Palgrave Macmillan
(2009)
[3] Qualitative Research Methods_
Collecting Evidence, Crafting
Analysis, Communicating Impact-
Wiley-Blackwell (2013)
[4] Robert K. Yin-Qualitative
Research from Start to Finish-The
Guilford Press (2015)
[5] Bala Kumaravadivelu-Critical
Classroom Discourse Analysis
(1999)
[5] Sharan B. Merriam, Elizabeth J. presenters:
Tisdell-Qualitative Research_ A
Guide to Design and
Implementation-Jossey-Bass (2015)
[2] Qualitative Research in Applied
Linguistics_ A Practical
Introduction-Palgrave Macmillan
(2009)
[6] Keith Richard
Qualitative.inquiry.in.tesol (2002)
[7] Harvey Daniels- Literature
Circles: Voice and Choice in Book
Clubs and Reading Groups (2001)
[5] Sharan B. Merriam, Elizabeth J. presenters:

8. Narrative analysis
9. Creative writing
Tisdell-Qualitative Research_ A
Guide to Design and
Implementation-Jossey-Bass (2015)
[6] James. Spradley. Participant
Observation (2016)

5. 10. Photo voice [7] Kimberly L. Oliver. A journey presenters:

into Narrative Analysis: A 1
11. Genre Based analysis Methodology for Discovering .
Meanings (1998)
12. Content analysis

6 13. Participant-oriented research [8] Fatemeh Ebrahimpour, Maryam presenters:

Esmaeili, Shokoh Varaei.
14. Phenomenology Photovoice: Method of data
collection in qualitative research.
(2018)

7 [9] Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer. presenters:

15. The Posthumanist Approach Methods of Critical Discourse
Analysis (2001)
16. Critical Pedagogical
Approach [10] Frederick J. Werst et al. A Five
Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis.
(2011)
8-12 Analysis proposal [7] Computer-Supported-Qualitative- 4 presenters:
Research 1.
Handling qualitative data_ a practical 2.
guide-SAGE Publications Ltd (2014)

[8] Modes-of-thinking-for-
qualitative-data-analysis
The Coding Manual for Qualitative
Researchers-SAGE Publ. (2012)
13-15 Consultation [8] Modes-of-thinking-for-
(background, research gap, qualitative-data-analysis
novelties, RQ, theoretical The Coding Manual for Qualitative
framework) Researchers-SAGE Publ. (2012)

[9] The SAGE handbook of

qualitative data analysis-SAGE
Publications Ltd (2014)

[10] Text Mining for Qualitative

Data Analysis in the Social
Sciences_ A Study on Democratic
Discourse in Germany-Springer
Fachmedien Wiesbaden
16 Final Project
Revised Proposal
E. Sources
1. Science Direct
2. Springer
3. PNRI: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=pnriZ-Library
4. APA 6th Referencing Style
5. Z.Libarary: https://z-lib.org/
6. https://publish-or-perish.en.softonic.com/
7. Mendeley Referencing System
8. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=xKcaqHIAAAAJ&hl=en  Slamet
Setiawan

F. Rules of Conduct

1. Attendance

You must attend the class at least 75%. Those who are 4 (four) or more times
absent are not allowed to join exams and therefore are considered failed.

2. Assignment
a. All work is to be typed, 1.15 spaced, a 12 of font Times New Romans, and on A4
paper.
All side margins are 2.5cm.
b. The work must be checked by Grammarly
Application.

c. You are to submit your assignment on the agreed date. Submission after that date
is reduced
5 points a day.
d. Use Mendeley referencing
manager.

3. Plagiarism
Assignments are expected to consist of your own written work. If you quote material
written by someone else, you must reference it to the source. Assignments contain
material that is copied from somewhere and not referenced will be given failing
grades. Turnitin level must be less than 20%.
 Surabaya, 8 September 2022
Student Representative, Lecturer,

Hady Sutris Winarlim

22… Prof. Slamet Setiawan, M.A., Ph.D.

Dr. Widyastuti, M.Pd.