PROGRAM DOKTOR ILMU EKONOMI

FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS

UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG
RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER
METODOLOGI PENELITIAN DAN ETIKA PENULSAN ILMIAH (EBE929202)

Dosen: Prof. Mahfud Sholihin, Ph.D & Tim

Email: mahfud@ugm.ac.id
Jam Kuliah: Kamis, 10.00 -13.20

Visi dan Misi FEB Unila

Vision
Becomes the top ten Economics and Business Faculty in Indonesia Year 2025
Mission
First Mission: Organizing qualified and relevant university’s tridarma
Second Mission: Doing good organization organization FEB Unila (good faculty governance)
Third Mission: Ensuring accessibility and equity of higher education
Fourth Mission: Establish cooperation with various parties at home and abroad

Visi dan Misi Program Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi

Vision

Menjadi Program Doktor Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis dengan Kualitas Standar Nasional dan
Internasional Pada Tahun 2025

Mission

1. Menjadikan Program studi dengan tata kelola yang berstandar nasional dan internasional
2. Menghasilkan Lulusan program doktor ilmu ekonomi, manajemen dan akuntansi yang
berdaya saing nasional dan internasional
3. Membangun budaya penelitian ilmu ekonomi, manajemen dan akuntansi yang memiliki
standar nasional dan internasional
4. Membangun budaya pengabdian ilmu ekonomi, manajemen dan akuntansi yang memiliki
standar nasional dan internasional
5. Memperluas jejaring penelitian serta kerjasama nasional dan internasional

Deskripsi Matakuliah
Matakuliah ini membahas konsep-konsep metodologi penelitian ilmiah khususnya di bidang ilmu
ekonomi, manajemen, dan akuntansi, berbagai metoda penelitian, proses penelitian dan penulisan
ilmiah, pemahaman tentang data dan proses pengumpulannya, analisis data, dan tata cara penulisan
proposal maupun laporan hasil penelitian (publikasi ilmiah).

1
Materi pembahasan mencakup metode kuantitatif maupun kualitatif.
Setelah menyelesaikan matakuliah ini para mahasiswa diharapkan mampu:
• memahami konsep metodologi penelitian ilmiah
• memahami berbagai proses penelitian
• memilih metode penelitian yang sesuai dengan pertanyaan penelitian
• memahami berbagai etika penelitian dan penulisan ilmiah
• menulis usulan (proposal) penelitian
• membuat instrument penelitian
• mengolah data dan menginterpretasi hasil analisis
• menyajikan hasil-hasil penelitian.

Metoda Kuliah
• Sistem belajar menggunakan sistem student-centered learning. Dengan demikian mahasiswa
dituntut untuk aktif berpartisipasi dalam diskusi kelas.
• Mahasiswa harus aktif belajar mandiri, dengan membaca buku dan artikel hasil penelitian yang
ditentukan sebelum kuliah dimulai.
• Dosen bertugas: (1) sebagai moderator: mengatur jalannya diskusi, menggarisbawahi materi yang
disajikan, dan merangkum hasil diskusi; (2) menambahkan materi dan praktik penelitian; (3)
menilai kinerja mahasiswa.
• Secara kelompok, mahasiswa akan membahas artikel hasil penelitian
• Secara individu, setiap mahasiswa wajib menulis proposal disertasi dan dikumpulkan saat ujian
akhir semester

Referensi
Utama:
1. Cooper, Donald R., & Schindler, P.S. (2011) Business Research Methods. (10th ed.),
Singapore: McGraw Hill Co. (CS)
2. Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches. Sage Publicaton. (C)
3. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publication. (Y)
4. Hartono, J. (2016). "Pedoman Survei Kuesioner: Mengembangkan Kuesioner, Mengatasi
Bias, dan Meningkatkan Respon", Penerbit Andi, Edisi 2. (J)

Tambahan:
1. Sekaran, U and Bougie, R. (2010). Business Research Methods: A Skill Building Approach.
Fifth Edition.
2. Sholihin, M dan Ratmono, D. 2020. Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 untuk
Hubungan Nonlinier dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis, Penerbit Andi.
3. Sholihin, M dan Anggraini, P.G. 2020. Analisis Data Penelitian Menggunakan Software
STATA. Penerbit Andi.
4. Hartono, J. (2017). Filosofi dan Metodologi Penelitian. Andi Publisher, Yogyakarta
5. Hartono, J. (2018). Strategi Penelitian Bisnis. Andi Publisher, Yogyakarta.
6. Hartono, J. (2020). Bias di Metode Penelitian dan Cara Mitigasinya. Andy Publisher,
Yogyakarta.
7. Hennink, M. et al (2011). Qualitative Research Methods, SAGE Publication.
8. Artikel-artikel hasil penelitian relevan

2
Penilaian
Komponen
UTS: 25%
UAS: 25%
Tugas akhir (Proposal) 25%
Tugas, Partisipasi dan diskusi: 25%

Konversi:
A 90 atau lebih A- 87 to 89 A/B 84 to 86
B+ 80 to 83 B 75 to 79 B- 70 to 74
C+ 65 to 69 C 60 to 64 D 51 to 59
E below 50

Nilai akhir dikelompokkan menurut skala berikut:

Nilai Range Cumulative Weighted

(Grade) Grade
E 0 - 29 0
D 30 - 34 1
D+ 35 - 39 1,25
C/D 40 - 44 1,5
C- 45 - 49 1,75
C 50 - 54 2
C+ 55 - 59 2,25
B/C 60 - 64 2,5
B- 65 - 69 2,75
B 70 - 74 3
B+ 75 - 79 3,25
A/B 80 - 84 3,5
A- 85 - 89 3,75
A ≥90 4.0

Penjelasan untuk masing-masing nilai adalah sebagai berikut:

Grade Explanation
A Like A-, with consistent evidence of substantial originality and understanding in
identifying, producing and communicating conflicting arguments, perspectives
or problem solving approaches; critically evaluate the problem, its solutions and
the implications of the problem.
A- Like B+, with much evidence of originality in defining and analyzing issues or
problems and in creating solutions; using levels, styles and suitable
communication means to the discipline of science and audience.
A/B to B+ Demonstrate a substantial understanding of basic concepts in various contexts;
develop or adapt convincing arguments and provide a comprehensive
justification; communicating information and ideas adequately in terms of
disciplinary conventions.
B Demonstrate adequate understanding and application of basic concepts from the
field of study; building arguments or decisions and providing acceptable
justification; communicating information and ideas adequately in terms of
disciplinary conventions.

3
 Grade Explanation
B- to C Demonstrate a superficial or partial or erroneous (faulty) understanding of basic
concepts of the field of study and the limited ability to apply the concepts;
giving an unsupported or improper argument; communicate information or
ideas with unclear and inconsistent compliance with disciplinary conventions.
C- to D+ Demostrate a real shortcoming in understanding and applying underlying
concepts; communicate the ideas and informations in incomplete ways or
confusing and give just little attention the conventions of the science field.
D Fail to demonstrate the major part or the whole part of learning goals.
E There is no work that can be graded.

Materi Kuliah

Sesi Topik Bahasan Referensi

1 • Pembahasan Rencana
Kuliah
• Pengantar dan Konsep-
Konsep dalam Metodologi
Penelitian ilmiah
2 • Etika dalam Penelitian
• Proses Penelitian,
Pertanyaan Penelitian,
• Desain Penelitan
3 • Telaah Literatur
4 • Penelitian Eksperimen
5 • Penelitian dengan Data
Sekunder
CS1&3
CS 2; C4
CS4&5;
CS6, C8, 9, 10
• Anggraini, P.G and Sholihin, M. (2021). What do
we know about managerial ability? A systematic
literature review. Management Review Quarterly.
Online ahead print.
• Indarti, N., Lukito-Budi, A.S., Islam, A.M.
(2020). A systematic review of halal supply chain
research: to where shall we go? Journal of
Islamic Marketing.
• Velte, P. (2019). What do we know about meta-
analyses in accounting, auditing, andcorporate
governance? Meditari Accountancy Research
Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 17-43
CS9; S6; C8, 9, 10
• Madein, A and Sholihin, M. (2015). The impact
of social and environmental information on
managers’ decisions. Asian Review of
Accounting, 23, 2, 156 – 169
• Rokhayati, H., Sholihin, M., Supriyadi, and
Nahartyo, N. (2022). The effect of regulatory
focus and performance measurement on corporate
social responsibility investment decisions, Social
Responsibility Journal, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 1004-
1018,
• Davis, S & Albright, T. (2004). An investigation
of the effect of Balanced Scorecard
implementation on financial performance.
Management Accounting Research, 15, 135-153
• Kuswantoro, H., Sholihin, M. dan Djajadikerta,
H. G. 2022. Exploring the implementation of
4

6 • Penelitian Survei
7 • Pengukuran, Skala
Pengukuran, dan
Pengembangan Kuesioner
UJIAN TENGAH SEMESTER
sustainable development goals: a comparison
between private and state‐owned enterprises in
Indonesia. Environment, Development and
Sustainability. Online ahead of print.
• Rakhman, F and Wijayana, S. 2019. Determinants
of Financial Reporting Quality in the Public
Sector: Evidence from Indonesia. The
International Journal of Accounting. Vol. 54, No.
3
• Wijayana, S and Achjari, D. 2020. Market
reaction to the announcement of an information
technology investment: Evidence from Indonesia.
Information & Management, 57.
CS 10; S7; C8, 9, 10; J3-10
• Lau, C.M and Sholihin, M. (2005). Financial and
nonfinancial performance measures: How do they
affect job satisfaction? The British Accounting
Review, 37, 389–413.
• Sholihin, M. and Pike, R. H. (2009). Fairness in
performance evaluation and its behavioural
consequences, Accounting and Business
Research, 39, 4, 397–413.
• Sholihin, M and Pike, R.H. (2010).
Organisational commitment in the police service:
Exploring the effects of performance measures,
procedural justice and interpersonal trust,
Financial Accountability and Management, 24, 1,
392-421.
• Sholihin, M., Pike, R.H., Mangena, M., and Li, J
(2011). Goal setting participation and goal
commitment: Examining the mediating roles of
procedural fairness and interpersonal trust, The
British Accounting Review, 43, 2, 135–146.
CS11,12,13;S4; J11-16
• Development of an Instrument to Measure the
Perceptions of Adopting New Information
Technology Innovation. Information Systems
Research (2:3), 1991, pp. 192-222.
• Davis, F. D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived
Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information
Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, Pp.
319-340.