Okki Verdiansyah
(INTY Lecturer, CPI PHE gold-basemetal)
06 Juli 2020
Outline
06 Juli 2020
4
Sampling Methods
antarafoto.com
06 Juli 2020
Poin penting dalam sampling
4
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
Jenis pengambilan sampel
4
06 Juli 2020
Kondisi tipe sumber sampel batuan
Permukaan
• Outcrop (singkapan) Bawah permukaan
• jelas Cutting
• Subcrop Hasil hancuran bersama lumpur
• Tidak jelas batas, bentuk dan polanya saat pemboran yang dinaikkan ke
• Batu besar di tinggian, bentuknya masih permukaan. Umumnya pada
angular pemboran softrock
• Subcrop silisifikasi 5 m, di bukit x Drill Core
• Float Hasil pemboran inti, berbentuk
• gelindingan, pada lereng, koluvium, scree, silinder, dengan jenis diameter PQ,
longsoran,. HQ, NQ tergantung kondisi
• Stream float
• pada tubuh air, sungai, tranportasi
minahexploration.com
http://billbukers.jigsy.com/
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
Berdasarkan akurasi - kedetilannya
• Grab sampling
• mengambil tanpa melihat
karakternya, tanpa memilah
• sample tahap awal, sampel di
sungai, atau lainnya
• besar sample, tergantung kondisi
awal.
• Biasa dilakukan pada bongkaran mdpi.com
singkapan atau material
• Selective sampling
• memilih karakter tertentu, misal
bagian veinlet sulfida dipisahkan
dari kuarsa.
• besar sample tergantung target
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
Berdasarkan akurasi - kedetilannya
Chip sampling
• Mencuplik, sepotong, sebagian kecil adari batuan target.
• Mengambil beberapa titik/sebagian vein kuarsa (10 cm) pada singkapan besar
(2m).
• Channel sampling
• Mengambil sepanjang jalur tertentu tanpa putus, disesuaikan dengan
perbedaan karakter yang ada
• Diambil pada trench, singkapan, underground tunnel, dll
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
Chip sampling
https://www.slideshare.net/pramodgpramod/sampling-techniques-for-mineral-deposit
06 Juni 2020
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
Channel sampling
06 Juli 2020
Channel sampling
06 Juni 2020
Channel sampling pada trench/parit
https://resourceworld.com/ Geologyhub.com
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
Core sampling protocol
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
Geologic Data Collection : Key Feature
Location Data
✓ - sample, map, mine, drill location
✓ geographic data : state, county, section, township, range, latitude, longitude, coordinates, elevation,
mining district, mine, pit, bench, level. working. claim. claim corner, identify the unique location of
geologic data points
✓ Data cannot be used if geologist does not know where they came from
Lithologic Data
✓ to describe rock, sample, or unit should include color, texture, mineralogical characteristics, lithology,
and rock type
✓ Primary structure (bedding, laminations, etc)
Structural data
✓ Clear description quatitative description of selvages, gouge zones, and fragment size, healed or re
cemented character of breccias
✓ RQD data, natural fracture, Fold
✓ Weathering and oxidation data
✓ Quantification of structural data
Geologic Data Collection : Key Feature
Alteration Data
✓ nature, mineralogy, intensity, and distribution of features.
✓ Color, texture, mineralogy, intensity, fracture or vein/veinlet relationship, control, stages, mineralization
association, and pervasiveness with respect to the overall effect on rock mass
✓ weathering and oxidation intensity
✓ Quantification data
Mineralization Data
✓ nature, intensity, mineralogy, and distribution of the desired resurce
✓ primary and secondary
✓ quatity of minerals, intensity, character of veinlets, vein, or disseminations, supergen features, weathering and
oxidation intensity, associated gangue mineralogy
✓ Sulfide content, mineral, metal ration, gangue mineralogy, metallurgical studies and testing
✓ Vein age relationship
✓ Assay work should includedesired ore elements, deleterious elements (arsenic, etc.) and iron or sulfur or both
to caculate total sulfide content
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
Outline
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
6 QA QC
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
QA QC
This programme should be concerned with, but not limited to, data
verification, drill sample recovery, sample size, sample
preparation, analytical methods, the use of
duplicates/blanks/standards, effects of multiple periods of data
acquisition and consistency of interpretation in three dimensions.
The results of the QA/QC programme form part of the database and
must be recorded
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum guide to Best Practice (CIM 2003)
06 Juni
06 Juli 2020
2020
QA QC
06 Juli 2020
Core sample : Sample Collection, Preparation and Analysis
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
Sampling Error
1) Contamination
▪ Contamination errors occur at any stage in exploration and is a much larger issue
for precious metals. From gold smearing on a saw blade, then being deposited on
another sample, to a logger logging core with a gold ring on, any redepositing of a
metal or material where it isn’t supposed to be is considered contamination. Rarer
examples are cross contamination at the lab level, maybe a crusher between
samples wasn’t cleaned properly, maybe a sample got mixed improperly
2) Procedural
• Procedural errors are errors resulting from deviations from the sampling
procedures. Perhaps a sample tag is mixed up or not recorded properly, maybe the
core cutter cut the sample improperly, or maybe the lab didn’t mix the sample
properly.
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
QAQC Procedurs
06 Juli 2020
QAQC
Key Concept :
Precision + Accuracy
06 Juli 2020
SRK consulting, 2011
06 Juli 2020
QAQC Procedurs
Lab penyedia :
•Rocklabs
•OREAS
•AMIS
•MineralStats Inc
•Geostats PTY LTD
•Nrcan (Canada natural resources)
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
CRM source
CRM
06 Juli 2020
5 Classification of Standart
06 Juli 2020
Standards – what interpretations can be made?
Laboratory QAQC
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
Re- assay the error blank sample, if any
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
Duplicate
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
5 Blank Samples
Blanks or samples without mineralization are submitted with each batch of samples sent to the
laboratory. The blank material is collected from a location known to be devoid of any
mineralization or purchased from a reputed supplier. Results from these samples indicates any
contamination introduced during the sample preparation or analysis procedures.
06 Juli 2020
5 Blank Samples
“BLANK” FAILURE
--→ Contamination,
1) Blanks may fail due to contamination of the original sample during the sample collection,
sample preparation (crushing or pulverizing), or analysis.
2) Blanks may also fail due to carryover.
✓ Carryover is contamination of a blank by a previously analyzed high grade sample. This
can occur due to inadequate cleaning of equipment between samples at both the
sample preparation stage and sample analysis stage. Laboratories will often insert silica
sand in the sample sequence after high grade samples to properly clean the equipment.
✓ Carryover often applies to ductile materials such as native gold, or high content
sulphides or very soft materials like graphite.
3) Blanks may also fail due to sample number mix-up.
4) Blanks may also fail due to analytical error as a result of poor equipment calibration,
incorrect dilution factor, incorrect calibration on a balance, and/or instrumental drift
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
Blank Samples
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
Care the target
06 Juli 2020
Auditing Laboratories and Preparation Facilities – What to Look out for!
1) QA – QC
2) Contoh QAQC di Eksplorasi
06 Juli 2020
6 Studi Kasus
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
Studi Kasus : Lihir Project – Newcrest 2014
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
From the beginning of 2011 to the end of 2013 there were 1600 CRMs analyzed for gold.
The median bias for that period was -4% (i.e. on average the assay results were 4% below the
CRM preferred value).
Figure 11.1 shows the pattern of results expressed in z-score units (one z is the same as one
standard deviation). Data have been curtailed at both ends; any z-score greater than 6 has been
attributed a value of 6 and any with a z-score below -6 has been attributed -6. This reduces the
impact of the outliers, many of which are a product of the poor precision at Lihir.
The red moving average line shows that the bias oscillated around -2 standard 36 Newcrest
Mining – Technical Report on the Lihir Property - 31 December 2013 deviations (equivalent to
about -5%) for much of the time followed by a period of reverse bias and then more moderated
bias (-3 to -4%) and improved precision.
06 Juli 2020
06 Juli 2020
ESCOBAL MINE GUATEMALA
06 Juli 2020